Lung mesenchymal expression of Sox9plays a critical role in tracheal development
© Turcatel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 November 2013
Accepted: 22 November 2013
Published: 25 November 2013
Embryonic lung development is instructed by crosstalk between mesenchyme and epithelia, which results in activation of transcriptional factors, such as Sox9, in a temporospatial manner. Sox9 is expressed in both distal lung epithelium and proximal lung mesenchyme. Here, we investigated the effect of lung mesenchyme-specific inducible deletion of Sox9 during murine lung development.
Transgenic mice lacking Sox9 expression were unable to breathe and died at birth, with noticeable tracheal defects. Cartilage rings were missing, and the tracheal lumen was collapsed in the mutant trachea. In situ hybridization showed an altered expression pattern of Tbx4, Tbx5 and Fgf10 genes and marked reduction of Collagen2 expression in the tracheal mesenchyme. The tracheal phenotype was increasingly severe, with longer duration of deletion. Lymphatic vasculature was underdeveloped in the mutant trachea: Prox1, Lyve1, and Vegfr3 were decreased after Sox9 knockout. We also found that compared with normal tracheal epithelium, the mutant tracheal epithelium had an altered morphology with fewer P63-positive cells and more CC10-positive cells, fewer goblet cells, and downregulation of surfactant proteins A and C.
The appropriate temporospatial expression of Sox9 in lung mesenchyme is necessary for appropriate tracheal cartilage formation, lymphatic vasculature system development, and epithelial differentiation. We uncovered a novel mechanism of lung epithelium differentiation: tracheal cartilage rings instruct the tracheal epithelium to differentiate properly during embryonic development. Thus, besides having a mechanical function, tracheal cartilage also appears to be a local signaling structure in the embryonic lung.
KeywordsSox9 Trachea Lung Cartilage CC10 P63
The development of the respiratory system represents an evolutionary hallmark that allowed vertebrates to survive on land utilizing air as a source of oxygen. Abnormal development of the respiratory system in humans is associated with multiple disorders such as tracheal/bronchial atresia, tracheo-esophageal fistula, bronchogenic cysts, pulmonary/lobar atresia, and pulmonary hypoplasia .
In the embryonic trachea, the endoderm differentiates into a ciliated pseudo-stratified epithelium, which includes basal P63+ cells, Clara cells, neuroendocrine cells, and ciliated cells. The ventral mesenchyme gradually matures to create C-shaped cartilage rings, while the dorsal mesenchyme forms contractile cells comprising the trachealis smooth muscle, which defines the posterior boundary between the trachea and esophagus. Tracheal wall malformation can be due to congenital or acquired abnormalities. The congenital forms are related to immature tracheal cartilage, whereas the more common acquired forms occur as a consequence of compression damage or degeneration of the tracheal cartilage, such as in vascular sling anomalies . Tracheomalacia is a condition described as causing excessive expiratory collapse of the trachea, resulting from weakness of the supporting structures of tracheal and bronchial walls, leading to symptoms of airway obstruction [2, 3].
β-catenin, Bmp4, and Shh are previously well-characterized regulators of cartilage formation, which may activate the Sox9 gene in mesenchymal cells to induce their differentiation into chondrocytes. Members of the fibroblast growth factor superfamily, including Fgf4, Fgf8, and Fgf10, are also key regulators of cartilage formation [4, 5]. Fgf18 regulates proliferation and spatial localization of the chondrocytes in the developing upper respiratory tract . Tbx4 and Tbx5 double knockout in lung resulted in defects of cartilage formation in mouse trachea and in altered lung branching, with Tbx4 and Tbx5 acting upstream of Sox9 in tracheal cartilage development .
Here, we used an inducible Tbx4 gene-driven system to knock out the Sox9 gene specifically in lung mesenchyme , in order to elucidate more fully its function within the mesenchyme during lung development. Mesenchymal Sox9 knockout had no affect on distal lung branching, on formation of smooth muscle around the bronchi, or on the trachealis smooth muscle, whereas tracheal cartilage formation was completely inhibited. In situ hybridization revealed that in the Sox9 null trachea, the characteristic Tbx4, Tbx5, and Fgf10 expression pattern was lost or severely disrupted.
Mutant Sox9 mouse tracheal epithelium was also altered: cells had a higher number of cytoplasmic vacuoles, with fewer basal cells (P63+ cells) and more Clara cells (CC10+ cells). Mutant tracheal epithelium also had fewer goblet cells compared with wild-type trachea. Surfactant proteins A and C were also downregulated. Finally, tracheal lymphatic vessels were significantly underdeveloped after the knockout of mesenchymal Sox9. In conclusion, mesenchymal Sox9-expressing cells cover a critical developmental role in the formation of tracheal cartilage rings, and in the appropriate differentiation of lung tracheal epithelium and lymphatic system.
Sox9expression during lung development
Mesenchymal Sox9knockout mice showed an absence of tracheal cartilage rings
The tracheal phenotype depends on the timing of doxycycline exposure
Expression pattern of Tbx4, Tbx5, and Fgf10 is altered in Sox9mutant trachea
Trachealis contractile muscle pattern formation and bronchial smooth muscle cells are not affected by Sox9knockout
The Tbx4, Tbx5, and Fgf10 expression patterns were lost in Sox9 mutants. This observation led us to investigate whether the Sox9 gene is also necessary for patterning the SM-22-α + cells, which are located at the junction between the trachea and esophagus (dorsal trachea), and form the trachealis muscle. Because Sox9-expressing cells are located at the ventral region of the trachea, Sm-22-α and Sox9 expression seems to be mutually exclusive, suggesting that expression of Sox9 is limiting the expression of Sm-22-α to the dorsal area of the trachea, and vice versa.
However, we found that Sox9 expression is not involved in patterning the expression of Sm-22-α-expressing cells in the trachea (Figure 5F-K). In fact, the contractile lunar-shaped ring of Sm-22-α + cells was still present and localized in the dorsal area of the mutant trachea. The absolute area covered by Sm22-α + cells did not change significantly in the mutant trachea versus the wild-type trachea (Figure 5J). We also analyzed whether the Sox9 gene was involved in the proliferation of bronchial smooth muscle cells; however, we did not observe any obvious change in smooth muscle cells lining the bronchi of mutant mouse lung (Figure 5L,M).
Tracheal epithelium is altered after Sox9knockout
Tracheal lymphatic system was altered in Sox9Δ/Δtrachea
Normal lung branching is achieved by tightly regulated crosstalk between mesenchymal and epithelial compartments. Specific growth factors are released from one compartment to activate expression of genes in the other compartment, and vice versa[14, 15]. Sox9 is a multifunctional transcriptional factor expressed in both embryonic lung mesenchyme and epithelium. Perl et al. reported that deletion of Sox9 gene in embryonic lung epithelium did not affect lung development; mice lacking Sox9 in the lung epithelium were viable and fertile, and did not show any differences from their control littermate, even when exposed to hyperoxia-induced injury . However, more recently, Chang et al. showed that Sox9 is necessary for proper lung branching . Sox9 is also a key regulator of embryonic kidney epithelial branching . These contrasting reports on Sox9 regulation of lung epithelial lung branching may be due to the use of different mouse genetic backgrounds by Perl and Chang. Here, we focused on the role of the mesenchymal Sox9-expressing cells, which are localized around the trachea and main bronchi. By using an inducible doxycycline-regulated system, driven by part of the Tbx4 gene promoter , we were able to delete Sox9 expression specifically in the mesenchymal compartment of the murine lung. Our collaborator Shi  developed the Tbx4-rtTA transgenic mouse line and in the present study, we showed that this mouse line specifically deleted Sox9 in lung mesenchyme (Figure 1D-I) and likewise activated a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene in lung mesenchyme (Figure 1J).
Mice lacking Sox9 did not develop tracheal cartilage rings, were unable to breathe because of tracheal collapse, and died shortly after birth. Transgenic mice appeared normal at birth, but then rapidly showed clear evidence of cyanosis (Figure 2A), and not a single transgenic pup lived more than a few hours after birth (Figure 2B), despite the birth weights of the mutants being similar to those of wild-type mice (Figure 2C). These data suggest that lack of mesenchymal Sox9 in embryonic lung is not compatible with life.
Arora et al. obtained a similar but milder tracheal cartilage phenotype in transgenic mice missing both the Tbx4 and Tbx5 genes; some cartilage trachea rings still developed, but they were smaller and had an abnormal shape . A Tbx4 and Tbx5 combined deletion also resulted in altered lung branching. Data from the same laboratory also suggested that Tbx4 and Tbx5 are upstream regulatory genes of Sox9 in the embryonic lung mesenchyme .
Lung mesenchyme Sox9 knockout mice did not show an obvious phenotype on lung branching; the number of terminal branches of the left lobe of E15.5 lungs was not different between the wild-type and mutant embryos (Figure 3A-C). Moreover, differentiation of distal lung epithelium and mesenchyme was not affected by lack of Sox9 mesenchymal expression at E18.5 (Figure 3D-G). Thus, Sox9 deletion appears to affect only tracheal development.
In our mesenchyme-specific Sox9 knockout model, Tbx4 and Tbx5 expression was enhanced in the trachea. This indicates the existence of a complex feedback from Tbx4/5 to Sox9 and vice versa. Thus, Tbx4/5 gene expression may have been upregulated, and may thus have partially compensated for the lost Sox9 expression in our mutant.
Moreover, Sox9 knockout mice also had an altered Tbx4/5 pattern of expression. In normal lung trachea, the Tbx4 and Tbx5 genes are expressed by the mesenchyme in the intervals between the developing cartilage rings. Thus, the Tbx4/5 genes and the Sox9 gene are normally mutually exclusive in the tracheal mesenchyme at E15.5. When the Sox9 gene was knocked out, the Tbx4/5 genes were uniformly expressed by all the mesenchyme surrounding the trachea. A similar result was obtained with Fgf10 pattern expression. At E15.5, Fgf10 is normally expressed by the developing cartilage rings in the trachea. Inactivation of Sox9 resulted in the disruption of the normal Fgf10 spatial expression pattern; Fgf10 was now expressed by all the mesenchyme surrounding the trachea. Quantification of the mRNA of Fgf10 did show a small trend towards a decrease in mRNA level, but this did not reach statistical significance.
Taken together, these data clearly indicate that the Sox9 gene has a key role in patterning the expression of Tbx4/5 and Fgf10 in the embryonic trachea. Genes linking Sox9 expression to Tbx4/5 and Fgf10 gene expression pattern will be the subject of future studies.
The Tbx4-rtTA inducible system allowed us to closely regulate the timing of Sox9 deletion. We took advantage of this to investigate how the length of time of doxycycline induction relates to the severity of the phenotype. We found that shorter induction resulted in a milder phenotype. If the doxycycline was removed from the food at E11.5, the two most distal cartilage rings formed fully (Figure 4G), but in these mice, the Tbx4 gene was expressed by all the lung mesenchyme , which implies that all lung mesenchymal cells in these mice have a non-functional Sox9 gene at that stage. There are several possible explanations for these results. It could be that mesenchymal Sox9-positive cells are continuously migrating from the laryngeal region into the tracheal mesenchyme to contribute to cartilage ring formation, or that the shorter doxycycline exposure results in incomplete Sox9 deletion. Another possible explanation is that Tbx4-rtTA is expressed in distal mesenchyme and then proceeds towards the larynx over time. Future studies involving the use of a Sox9-ER-cre mouse line in combination with our Tbx4-rtTA model should be able to determine which explanation is likely to be the correct one. However, considering that Sox9 is also expressed by neural crest cells [17, 18], which are ‘migratory’ cells, the hypothesis of Sox9 continuously migrating into the lung mesenchyme seems to be the most plausible, and it will be the first hypothesis to be tested in our future studies. By E14.5 to E15.5, tracheal Tbx4 and Sox9 are mutually exclusively expressed, thus as predicted, knockout of the Sox9 gene atat this later stage (E14-5 to E15-5) did not affect tracheal cartilage development (Figure 4). The ability to regulate the severity of the tracheal phenotype will allow us to tailor timed knockouts to model specific tracheal and lung disease models for future studies.
As pointed out above, mesenchymal-epithelial crosstalk is required for correct development of the embryonic lung. Therefore, anatomical or molecular alterations of one embryonic compartment such as mesenchyme may affect the correct development of the epithelia, and vice versa. We noticed that the tracheal epithelium was altered after mesenchymal Sox9 knockout. Cell count analysis revealed that mutant trachea had a lower number of basal P63+ cells, and a higher number of Clara (CC10+) cells. The number of ciliated cells did not change. An immediate conclusion would be that the absence of cartilage rings around the embryonic trachea caused the tracheal epithelium to behave more similarly to the more distal intralobar bronchiolar epithelium. As the number of basal cells was not altered in the E15.5 Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea, we suggest that basal cell differentiation is not directly dependent on Sox9 expression but is more likely to depend on cartilage condensation, which normally starts to occur at E15.5. Thus, we speculate that a specific growth factor signal (or signals) may be released by the cartilage rings to promote correct tracheal epithelium differentiation.
Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea had reduced production of Agr2, a protein that identifies goblet cells in the lung. Moreover, transcripts of both surfactant proteins A and C were reduced in the mutant trachea, further supporting the role of Sox9 expressing cells in the differentiation of tracheal epithelium.
Despite the altered differentiation, proliferation of tracheal epithelium was not affected by lack of mesenchymal Sox9 expression. No change in pH3 or epithelial cell number per transversal section was found (Figure 8A-E). Thus, lack of tracheal rings altered proper differentiation of tracheal epithelium but not its proliferation.
The expression pattern of Fgf10 in Sox9 Δ/Δ embryonic trachea was markedly altered. Even though it was not statistically significant, Fgf10 mRNA level was slightly decreased in the mutant trachea. Volckaert et al.  showed that Fgf10 overexpression resulted in an increased number of basal cells and decreased number of Clara cells . Because of the concordance of these and our results, we hypothesize that incorrect expression of Fgf10 may be mostly responsible for the altered differentiation of tracheal epithelium in the Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea. We cannot conclude without any doubt that the epithelial phenotype is directly related to the absence of signals originating from the cartilage rings. An alternative plausible model is that the lack of mechanical support (and thus collapse) of the trachea instructs the epithelium to differentiate onto a different path. Finally, the lack of proper vasculature development (discussion below) in the mutant trachea may also contribute to the altered differentiation of the tracheal epithelium.
Gli2–/–,Gli3+/– mutants displayed esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula and a severe lung phenotype . Gli2 and Gli3 gene expression in the Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea did not change in our Sox9 knockout model (Figure 9E). Shh and Gli1 are also key regulators of cartilage development , but their expression was not altered in our Sox9 Δ/Δ embryonic trachea (Figure 9E). Expression of Collagen2, a key regulator of cartilage differentiation, was reduced after Sox9 deletion, supporting the model in which Sox9 acts upstream of Collagen2 to control tracheal cartilage development.
Despite the somewhat misleading visual appearance, the numbers of mesenchymal cells and the area covered by them were not different between the Sox9 fl/fl and Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea (Figure 9A-C,C′). Thus, the apparent difference in size observed between the wild-type and mutant tracheas is caused by the lack of the cartilage rings in the Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea. Pecam is broadly expressed by vascular structures [22, 23]. and its expression in the distal lung mesenchyme was assayed to investigate any alterations of distal mesenchyme lung differentiation. As we observed for the distal epithelium, the distal lung mesenchyme appeared normal in the mutant trachea. We concluded that lack of Sox9 in the lung mesenchyme did not affect the differentiation or development of the vasculature in the distal lung mesenchyme.
The lymphatic vascular system serves to transport tissue fluid, extravasated plasma proteins, and cells back to the circulation [24, 25]. Prox1 and Lyve1 are key regulators and markers of lymphatic vessel development. The lymphatic system was significantly underdeveloped in the mutant Sox9 tracheas; immunostaining of Prox1, Lyve1, and Pecam, and mRNA level of Prox1, Lyve1, and Vegfr3 were reduced in the Sox9 Δ/Δ tracheas. Thus, lack of tracheal cartilage affects appropriate tracheal lymphatic vessel development. It is also possible that an early Sox9-expressing mesenchymal cell population exists, and that this differentiates into lymphatic vessel cells. As Pecam is expressed by both blood and lymphatic vascular vessels, we speculate that mesenchymal Sox9 expression has a broad role in the generalized vascularization of the trachea. The mechanism linking the lack of cartilage rings to the altered tracheal vascularization is under further investigation. We focused on epidermal growth factor, as it is known to be involved in lymphatic vessel modeling in the skin , and found it to be downregulated in the Sox9 Δ/Δ trachea (data not shown).
The appropriate temporospatial expression of Sox9 in lung mesenchyme is necessary for correct tracheal cartilage formation, lymphatic vasculature system development, and epithelial differentiation. Our study showed that a lack of tracheal cartilage rings resulted in increase in Clara cells and decrease in basal and goblet cells in the tracheal epithelium. We also uncovered a novel mechanism of lung epithelium differentiation; tracheal cartilage rings instruct the tracheal epithelium to differentiate properly during embryonic development. Thus, besides having a mechanical function, tracheal cartilage also appears to be a local signaling structure in the embryonic lung.
We strictly followed the National Institute of Health guidelines for animal care and safety. The animal experimental∆ protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), where the vivarium is under weekly surveillance by an external chief veterinarian to check animal health. Our animal facility is approved by the AAALAC (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care) and USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture).
Sox9 fl/fl mice were bought from Jackson Laboratories (Sacramento, CA). Tbx4-rtTA mice were kindly provided by W Shi (CHLA) . The plasmid bearing the lung-specific enhancer of Tbx4 was kindly provided by D B Menke (University of Georgia) . Tet-On-Cre mice were bought from Jackson Laboratories. Mt/mG mice (stock number 007576) were bought from Jackson Laboratories. Tbx4-rtTA/Tet-on-cre mice were generated and crossed with female Sox9 fl/fl . Timed pregnant mice were fed with doxycycline chow (rodent diet with 0.0625% doxycycline; Harlan Teklad TD01306) from E7.5 stage, unless specified.
Alcian blue staining
Alcian blue staining was performed in accordance with standard protocols. Lungs and trachea were dissected out at different stages of life, and fixed in 95% ethanol for 1 to 2 days, stained in Alcian blue solution for 1 day, washed with 95% ethanol for 1 to 2 days, and finally clarified in 1% potassium hydroxide solution for 2 to 5 hours . For Alcian blue staining on tissue sections, 5 μm thick paraffin wax-embedded sections were rehydrated, stained with 1% Alcian blue in 3% acetic acid for 30 minutes, washed in distilled water, and counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red.
Whole-mount in situhybridization
E15.5 lungs were isolated from embryos and fixed for 2 hours in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The samples were washed twice in PBS for 5 minutes, transferred to 70% ethanol overnight, and stored in 100% ethanol until needed. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as previously described, with riboprobes transcribed from murine plasmid DNA templates .
Immunohistochemistry and histology
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed on 5 μm thick paraffin wax-embedded sections, as described previously. Primary antibodies used were anti-Sm22-α, P63, Sox9, CC10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Tubb4 (BioGenex), (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank antibody 8.1.1), anti-Agr2 (Abgent), anti-phospho-H3, β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), α-SMA (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-PECAM (LifeSpan Bioscences Inc.), anti-Prox1, and Lyve1 (both Angiobio). The Alexa Fluor 488, 555, and 647 secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen.
For histological evaluation, embryos were removed from the uterine horns, and dissected free from the decidua, then the lungs were removed and fixed in 4% formalin at room temperature. After dehydration in ethanol, embryos were embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 5 μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Alcian blue.
cDNA reverse transcription and real-time reverse transcription PCR
Total RNA was extracted from mouse tracheas using Trizol reagent, then 500 to 1,000 ng of RNA was reverse-transcribed using the IscriptcDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). RNA was extracted from a pool of three tracheas to get sufficient good-quality RNA for expression analysis. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in a Lightcycler II (Roche Applied Science) using gene-specific primers (Operon, Huntsville, AL, USA) and fluorescence probes (Roche Applied Science).
Embryos were dissected in cold PBS, tracheas were separated from the esophagus and lysed with RIPA buffer (1 × Tris-buffered saline, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.004% sodium azide; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), supplied with phosphatase and protease inhibitors (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) solution, sodium orthovanadate solution, and protease inhibitor cocktail solution; Sigma-Aldrich). Three tracheas from each experimental group (wild-type and control) were combined together to achieve a sufficient amount of protein lysate. β-actin protein amount was used as loading control and measured in each western blot experiment.
Cell count and cellular area analysis
A Leica confocal microscope (Leica) was used to capture fluorescent images. For epithelial and mesenchymal cells counts, (Figure 8C, Figure 9C), 4 μm thick tracheal transversal sections were used; nuclei were highlighted with DAPI or hematoxylin, and counted with ImageJ software.
For mesenchymal area analysis, the mesenchyme area on transversal sections of tracheas was highlighted, and pixels were counted using Photoshop software.
The student’s t-test was used to perform statistical analysis. Every experiment was repeated at least three times unless indicated.
We thank Dr. Mark Frey and Sue Buckley for critical editing of the manuscript.
This work was funded by The Pasadena Guild of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Endowment, by The Garland Foundation, The Webb Foundation and by a California Institute of Regenerative Medicine Training Grant to DW.
- Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Trapnell BC: Genetic disorders influencing lung formation and function at birth. Hum Mol Genet. 2004, 13: 207-215. 10.1093/hmg/ddh252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goo HW: Free-breathing cine CT for the diagnosis of tracheomalacia in young children. Pediatr Radiol. 2013, 42: 922-928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kandaswamy C, et al: Severe tracheomalacia in the ICU: identification of diagnostic criteria and risk factor analysis from a case control study. Respir Care. 2013, 58: 340-347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldring MB, Tsuchimochi K, Ijiri K: The control of chondrogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2006, 97: 33-44. 10.1002/jcb.20652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sala FG, et al: FGF10 controls the patterning of the tracheal cartilage rings via Shh. Development. 2011, 138: 273-282. 10.1242/dev.051680.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elluru RG, Thompson F, Reece A: Fibroblast growth factor 18 gives growth and directional cues to airway cartilage. Laryngoscope. 2009, 119: 1153-1165. 10.1002/lary.20157.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arora R, Metzger RJ, Papaioannou VE: Multiple roles and interactions of Tbx4 and Tbx5 in development of the respiratory system. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8: e1002866-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002866.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menke DB, Guenther C, Kingsley DM: Dual hindlimb control elements in the Tbx4 gene and region-specific control of bone size in vertebrate limbs. Development. 2008, 135: 2543-2553. 10.1242/dev.017384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang W, et al: Spatial-temporal targeting of lung-specific mesenchyme by a Tbx4 enhancer. BMC Biol. 2013, 11: 111-10.1186/1741-7007-11-111.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perl AK, et al: Normal lung development and function after Sox9 inactivation in the respiratory epithelium. Genesis. 2005, 41: 23-32. 10.1002/gene.20093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang DR, et al: Lung epithelial branching program antagonizes alveolar differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110: 18042-18051. 10.1073/pnas.1311760110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mishima K, et al: Prox1 induces lymphatic endothelial differentiation via integrin alpha9 and other signaling cascades. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18: 1421-1429. 10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0780.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaltezioti V, et al: Prox1 regulates the notch1-mediated inhibition of neurogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000565-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rackley CR, Stripp BR: Building and maintaining the epithelium of the lung. J Clin Invest. 2012, 122: 2724-2730. 10.1172/JCI60519.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warburton D, et al: Lung organogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2010, 90: 73-158.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reginensi A, et al: SOX9 controls epithelial branching by activating RET effector genes during kidney development. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20: 1143-1153. 10.1093/hmg/ddq558.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori-Akiyama Y, et al: Sox9 is required for determination of the chondrogenic cell lineage in the cranial neural crest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 9360-9365. 10.1073/pnas.1631288100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahar DE, Longaker MT, Quarto N: Sox9 neural crest determinant gene controls patterning and closure of the posterior frontal cranial suture. Dev Biol. 2005, 280: 344-361. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volckaert T, et al: Localized Fgf10 expression is not required for lung branching morphogenesis but prevents differentiation of epithelial progenitors. Development. 2013, 140: 3731-3742. 10.1242/dev.096560.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motoyama J, et al: Essential function of Gli2 and Gli3 in the formation of lung, trachea and oesophagus. Nat Genet. 1998, 20: 54-57. 10.1038/1711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park J, et al: Regulation of Sox9 by Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) is essential for patterning and formation of tracheal cartilage. Dev Dyn. 2010, 239: 514-526. 10.1002/dvdy.22192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson DE: The unfolding tale of PECAM-1. FEBS Lett. 2003, 540: 7-14. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00224-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liersch R, et al: Induction of lymphatic endothelial cell differentiation in embryoid bodies. Blood. 2006, 107: 1214-1216.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karkkainen MJ, Alitalo K: Lymphatic endothelial regulation, lymphoedema, and lymph node metastasis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002, 13: 9-18. 10.1006/scdb.2001.0286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karkkainen MJ, Makinen T, Alitalo K: Lymphatic endothelium: a new frontier of metastasis research. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: E2-E5. 10.1038/ncb0102-e2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marino D, et al: Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor promotes lymphangiogenesis in the skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2013, 71: 184-194. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.04.024.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.