Brachyury cooperates with Wnt/β-catenin signalling to elicit primitive-streak-like behaviour in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells
© Turner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 16 May 2014
Accepted: 25 July 2014
Published: 13 August 2014
The formation of the primitive streak is the first visible sign of gastrulation, the process by which the three germ layers are formed from a single epithelium during early development. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) provide a good system for understanding the molecular and cellular events associated with these processes. Previous work, both in embryos and in culture, has shown how converging signals from both nodal/TGFβR and Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathways specify cells to adopt a primitive-streak-like fate and direct them to undertake an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, many of these approaches have relied on genetic analyses without taking into account the temporal progression of events within single cells. In addition, it is still unclear to what extent events in the embryo are able to be reproduced in culture.
Here, we combine flow cytometry and a quantitative live single-cell imaging approach to demonstrate how the controlled differentiation of mouse ESCs towards a primitive streak fate in culture results in cells displaying many of the characteristics observed during early mouse development including transient brachyury expression, EMT and increased motility. We also find that the EMT initiates the process, and this is both fuelled and terminated by the action of brachyury, whose expression is dependent on the EMT and β-catenin activity.
As a consequence of our analysis, we propose that a major output of brachyury expression is in controlling the velocity of the cells that are transiting out of the primitive streak.
KeywordsWnt β-catenin mouse embryonic stem cell mesendoderm primitive streak live-cell imaging brachyury epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition EMT activin nodal
The development of an organism is the result of the proliferation, concomitant phenotypic diversification and spatial organization of cells in the context of spatiotemporally controlled patterns of gene expression -. The use of genetics to interrogate these processes has revealed that they are underpinned by the temporal iteration of coordinated interactions between signal transduction and transcription factor networks. Establishing the relationship between these molecular events and the emergence of cellular diversity is an essential step towards understanding the relationship between programs of gene activity and the process of morphogenesis that shapes cells into tissues and organs.
Gastrulation is one of the earliest events where it is possible to observe a convergence of fate specification and morphogenetic processes in embryos . It occurs in all metazoans and encompasses a choreography of cell movements that transforms a group of seemingly identical epithelial cells, with species-specific geometry, into the outline of an organism exhibiting an overt anterior-posterior organization and three germ layers (ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm) -. In chordates, gastrulation is led by a dynamic population of cells that gives rise to the mesoderm and the endoderm, defines and patterns the neuroectoderm and delineates the plane of bilateral symmetry ,. In mammalian embryos this population, called the primitive streak, is associated with the expression of the T-box transcription factor brachyury (Bra) ,-. In the mouse, Bra is first expressed shortly after implantation in a group of cells at the boundary between the prospective embryonic and extraembryonic tissues. At stage E6.5, preceding the onset of gastrulation movements, Bra expression becomes restricted to the proximal posterior region of the embryo , at the position where under the influence of nodal and Wnt signalling, the primitive streak is initiated as a dynamic structure that will progress towards the distal end of the epiblast, ploughing an anteroposterior axis . At the cellular level, gastrulation involves a sequence of highly organized epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) movements that propagate through the tissue in a manner that resembles a travelling wave -. The first cells undergoing EMT ingress and move towards the anterior contralateral side of the embryo. This movement accompanies the distal/anterior spread of the streak and thus, by the end of gastrulation, two-thirds of the epiblast has been wrapped by the cells that have undergone gastrulation. This choreography of cell movements is characterized by the expression of a number of transcription factors at the leading edge of the EMT, in particular brachyury , Eomes  and Mixl1 .
Just anterior to the primitive streak there is a structure, the organizer, which does not undergo an EMT, shows homology with the Spemann organizer and will become the node when the streak reaches the distal-most anterior region of the epiblast at about E7.5 . The organizer and the node express Bra and after E7.5 the node regresses towards the posterior pole of the embryo, leaving the notochord in its wake. The node and the notochord continue to express Bra. After this time, Bra expression becomes restricted to a region in the tail that will undergo caudal extension to generate the caudal spinal cord and somatic mesoderm, ,,-. Genetic analysis has shown that in embryos, Bra is required for both movement of the cells through the primitive streak during axial extension and their specification into the mesoderm and notochord posterior to somite 7 -.
The localization of Bra expression to the proximal posterior region of the epiblast is a useful reference for the onset of gastrulation. Genetic analysis has identified a requirement for bone morphogenetic factor (BMP), Wnt/β-catenin and nodal for this event . These studies have also shown that BMP sets up the expression of nodal and Wnt3a, which, from the visceral endoderm, are likely to be the direct activators of Bra expression. How individual cells integrate nodal and Wnt signalling with the expression of Bra to promote the directional EMT and how these events are coordinated across the cell population that is defined as the primitive streak is not known. While there are some reports of the gastrulation movements in mouse embryos with a cellular resolution ,, these are descriptive and the visualization systems do not lend themselves to experimental perturbations.
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs), clonal populations of cells from the pre-implantation blastocysts ,, can be differentiated in culture into Bra-expressing cells that exhibit gene expression profiles characteristic of the primitive streak ,-. In addition to gene expression analysis, ESCs also offer the opportunity to quantify proteins at the level of single cells through live imaging. For these reasons, ESCs could provide a useful model for understanding the link between signals and morphogenesis in the context of the onset of gastrulation. However, to do this it is important to show that, in addition to patterns of gene expression, the differentiating ESCs share other features with the cells in the primitive streak, in particular EMT and its relationship to Bra expression.
Here we have used a combination of live-cell imaging, immunocytochemistry and chemical genetics to analyse the onset and consequences of Bra expression in mouse ESCs (mESCs) at the level of single cells. We observe that mESCs grown on gelatin and in the presence of activin (Act) and chiron (Chi, an agonist of Wnt/β-catenin signalling), undergo an EMT associated with the expression of Bra and that the EMT itself contributes to Bra expression. We are able to separate the inputs of β-catenin and Act into the onset of Bra expression and show that while β-catenin is required for the up-regulation of Bra, Act is required for the velocity, and thereby the distance cells travel. We discuss our findings in the context of the emergence of the primitive streak during gastrulation and suggest that differentiation of ESCs into Bra-expressing cells in culture provides a valuable system for studying the mechanisms that specify the emergence of the primitive streak.
The onset of brachyury expression in culture
Individual treatment of the Bra::GFP mESCs with either Act (100 ng/ml) or Chi (3 μM) resulted in a transient rise in the proportion of cells expressing GFP (Figure 1A). For Act alone, we observe a peak of approximately 10% at 72 h, whereas treatment with Chi anticipates this peak with 25% of the total population expressing Bra::GFP at 48 h. The combination of Act and Chi (Act/Chi) results in an increase in the proportion of cells expressing Bra::GFP (approximately 33% GFP positive at 48 to 72 h), which is sustained relative to Chi alone. These observations extend previous ones , and suggest that both Act and Wnt/β-catenin signalling can influence the progression of pluripotent cells towards a state characterized by the expression of Bra.
To understand the individual contributions of Act and Wnt/β-catenin signalling to the expression of Bra::GFP, specific inhibitors targeting each pathway were added to the cell culture medium (Figure 1A). Inhibition of β-catenin signalling during Act treatment resulted in complete ablation of Bra::GFP induction compared with the DMSO control (P < 0.05). A similar effect was observed upon inhibition of Act signalling by SB43 (an inhibitor of Act/nodal signalling) in the presence of Act or Chi.
Taken together, these results are in agreement with previous observations  that the onset of Bra::GFP by Act ligands not only requires active β-catenin signalling, but that an active Act pathway is absolutely required for β-catenin-mediated Bra induction.
An epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition associated with mesendodermal differentiation in embryonic stem cells
Pluripotent cells are characterized by high levels of E-cadherin - even though they lack an epithelial structure and when grown on gelatin, exhibit low levels of fibronectin basally (Additional file 2: Figure S2A,B). Analysis of fixed samples of cultures exposed to Act/Chi, shows that the onset of differentiation into mesendoderm is associated with a decrease in the levels of E-cadherin concomitant with the onset of Bra expression (Additional file 2: Figure S2A). The expression of Bra tends to be localized to the edges of the disorganizing colonies and coincides with a rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton and a boundary of expression of fibronectin (see Figure 2C and Additional file 2: Figure S2C). As cells become motile, there is an increase in the amount of fibronectin basally, as well as a progressive increase in the levels of F-actin apically (Figure 2B,C,D and Additional file 2: Figure S2C). A proportion of F-actin is found in the lamellipodia and filopodia at the edges of the colony in what appears to be moving cells (Figure 2D and Additional file 2: Figure S2B).
Brachyury expression correlates with Nanog expression during embryonic stem cell differentiation
A hallmark of ESC differentiation is the down-regulation in the expression of elements of the pluripotency network. To understand the relationship between this process and the onset of mesendodermal differentiation at the level of single cells, we used quantitative image analysis (QIA) to monitor the expression of Bra in wild-type (WT) E14-Tg2A mESCs relative to that of Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 following Act, Chi or Act/Chi treatment (Figure 3 and Additional file 3: Figure S3).
Act treatment leads to the expression of Bra in a small proportion of the cells undergoing an EMT whereas either Chi- or Act/Chi-induced differentiation resulted in a larger proportion of cells expressing Bra and, eventually, adopting a mesenchymal morphology. Furthermore, in Act/Chi conditions, these cells also express Sox17 and FoxA2 and other primitive streak markers such as Gsc (data not shown). A small proportion of cells form tight balls around which the mesenchymal cells progressed (Figure 3A,B). The cells in the tight balls expressed Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2, suggesting that within the colony centres, the cells remain pluripotent. Confocal images from these samples were then subject to QIA where the average pixel intensity in cell nuclei (identified and segmented by Hoechst stain uptake levels) was measured for each fluorescent channel (Figure 3C-F).
Analysis of the time evolution of the distributions for the different proteins shows a wave of Bra expression in all conditions (Figure 3C), though it is more pronounced and involves more cells for Act/Chi. Chi alone also promotes the expression of Bra, but the levels and proportion of cells increase when it is supplemented with Act (Figure 3C). In both cases, the increase in Bra levels is far from homogeneous within the population of cells, a fact that is compatible with imperfect coordination of its rapid and transient expression. We also noticed that while the levels of Oct4 and Sox2 decrease during the first 2 days of differentiation (Figure 3E,F), in all cases Nanog expression undergoes a transient rise during days 2 and 3 (Figure 3D). Analysis of pairwise protein levels in individual cells indicates an increase in the correlation between Nanog and Bra levels in Act and Act/Chi conditions, which by day 2 go beyond the correlation levels in LB (Figure 3G). A more transient and earlier increase in correlation levels can be observed between Oct4 and Bra in Act/Chi. In addition, strong correlations were also observed between Nanog and Oct4 (Additional file 3: Figure S3), whereas Nanog and Sox2 became more correlated as time progressed (Additional file 3: Figure S3). These observations extend those of  and suggest that the events in culture parallel the events in embryos where there is a transient rise in Nanog expression in the cells of the primitive streak at the start of gastrulation -.
These results, together with those of the cell behaviours associated with the differentiation process, suggest that exposure of mESCs to Act/Chi triggers a developmental process that is very similar to that of the cells that undergo gastrulation in terms of gene expression  as well as cell behaviour.
The onset of brachyury expression is tightly linked to an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cell motility in adherent culture
Additional file 5: Movie M1.: Live imaging of Bra::GFP cells cultured in Act/Chi. Bra::GFP mESCs were plated in N2B27 supplemented with Act/Chi. As time progresses, cells begin to display EMT-like movements, become openly motile and begin to express Bra::GFP. Time in h. (AVI 13 MB)
Additional file 6: Movie M2.: Live imaging of the β-catenin transcriptional reporter line (TLC2) following treatment with Act/Chi. The TCF/LEF::mCherry (TLC2) mESC reporter line was plated in N2B27 supplemented with Act/Chi. Cells initially expressed low and heterogeneous levels of the reporter, which increased over time in the cells that would eventually undergo an EMT event and disperse from the colony. Following colony exit, cells began to down-regulate the reporter. Time in hours. (AVI 5 MB)
After 24 to 48 h of Act/Chi treatment, a large proportion of cells undergo EMT-like movements and become openly motile (Figure 4A; Additional file 5: Movie M1). In these conditions, up-regulation of the Bra::GFP reporter was heterogeneous and occurred in cells that were in the process of or undergoing an EMT event within a temporally restricted window (Figure 4A). The time to the acquisition of a GFP-positive state was fixed, always spanning the second to early third day of differentiation. This correlation between Bra expression, EMT and movement is repeated when cells are treated with Chi or Act individually (Additional file 4: Figure S4A). In Act conditions, however, fewer cells up-regulated the Bra::GFP reporter (see Figure 1A) and the EMT-like events occurred between 48 and 72 h after initiation of treatment (Additional file 4: Figure S4A). Up-regulation of the reporter was on average more rapid in Act/Chi conditions than with either Chi or Act alone.
To quantify the characteristics of cell movement and GFP expression, individual cells were manually tracked for long periods of time at a high temporal resolution (approximately 6 frames/h, Figure 4B) and their Bra::GFP levels, instant velocities (the velocity of a cell from frame to frame) and motility (or diffusivity) were measured (Figure 4B'–G and Additional file 4: Figure S4B,C). Population-wise, cells in Act/Chi achieved higher instant velocities much earlier and sustained them for a longer period of time than in either Act or Chi alone (Figure 4B',D). Binning the velocities based on the time at which the cell analysis began (0 to 20 h, 20 to 40 h and 40 to 60 h), revealed that cells did not have high velocities from the very beginning but these built up as time progressed (Figure 4B',E).
Although the ability of Act or Chi to alter the instant velocities of individual cells was clear in our analysis, we resorted to statistical methods of random motion particle tracking to provide an objective measurement of the differences in cell motility between the different stimulation conditions (Figure 4D–G). In particular, we computed the mean-squared displacement (MSD) curves for each cell (Figure 4F), which, despite being less intuitive than cell velocities, provide a robust analytical framework for rapidly moving cells. When considering all cells tracked over the entire course of the experiment, the evolution of the MSD in Act/Chi is much higher than for individual Act or Chi stimulation (Figure 4E); i.e., cells treated with Act/Chi travel, on average, much larger distances in the same amount of time than cells in either Act or Chi. In addition, in the three cases (Act, Chi or Act/Chi), the initial MSD increases approximately linearly with time, a sign of diffusive movement, and after the first 3 h these plateau (Figure 4F). This levelling out of the MSD is due to a combination of both cell confinement as well as to the fact that we have only tracked cells that remain within the field of view (and thus we underestimate the MSD over long periods of time). Therefore, for each condition, we estimated an effective diffusivity (Additional file 4: Figure S4). The evolution of the coefficient of diffusion over time indicates that cells in Act/Chi acquire a much larger degree of motility than cells in Act or Chi and that they do so both much earlier and for a longer period of time (Figure 4G).
In addition, we studied the relationship between Bra expression and the dynamic behaviour of individual cells treated with Act/Chi. We found a correlation between Bra expression and cell movement and also that those cells with higher velocities had higher levels of the Bra::GFP (Figure 4C). Consistently, individual cells with levels of Bra::GFP above the average covered much larger ground (Figure 4C, lower panel).
We further analysed the trajectories of the cells to understand whether there was a particular bias to cell motion in terms of directionality and persistence (a continued direction of movement on a cell by cell basis; Figure 4H and Additional file 4: Figure S4D). In all conditions tested (including both an N2B27 and serum LIF control), the distribution of turning angles was far from isotropic (Additional file 4: Figure S4D; all conditions had P < 0.00001 for the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test against the uniform distribution), a clear indication that regardless of the medium condition, when cells move, they do so with persistence and that the main difference between different conditions is the velocity and the ground covered by individual cells (Additional file 4: Figure S4D).
The importance of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the onset of Bra expression , (and here) led us to monitor Wnt/β-catenin signalling during differentiation using an H2B-TCF/LEF-mCherry reporter over time (TLC2) (Figure 4H,I and Additional file 4: Figure S4E) ,. Cells initially expressed low, heterogeneous levels of fluorescence. Over time, however, reporter expression increased within the centre of colonies until cells began to disperse from the edges as they initiated EMT (Figure 4H, Additional file 4: Figure S4E and Additional file 6: Movie M2). The activity of the Wnt-reporter in the transitioning cells was down-regulated following their exit from the colony, correlating with Bra::GFP down regulation in highly motile cells (Figure 4I and Additional file 4: Figure S4E).
Our observations and analysis provide information on the temporal order of events with respect to Bra induction, β-catenin signalling and the EMT: (a) cells increase the β-catenin transcriptional activity, (b) cells express Bra and initiate the EMT event and (c) cells reduce transcriptional activity of β-catenin and Bra as cells migrate away from the colony and become motile.
Nodal/activin and Wnt/β-catenin signalling provide a link between the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and Bra expression
In the presence of Chi, E14-Tg2A cells exhibit a loss of E-cadherin from the membrane and nuclear relocalization of β-catenin coincident with the EMT and the onset of Bra expression (Figure 5B,B' and Additional file 2: Figure S2A). Instead, cells in both Chi and CsA did not lose E-cadherin expression and for the most part, β-catenin remained associated with the membrane (Figure 5B,B"). Cells in these conditions display low expression of Bra and of Bra::GFP (Figure 5A,B,B") and show that a release of β-catenin from the adherens junctions is a prerequisite for its effect on Bra expression. On the other hand, cells treated with Act and CsA showed limited up-regulation of Bra (the same as we observe with Bra::GFP), with incomplete degradation of E-cadherin (Additional file 7: Figure S5A). However, CsA had a much lesser effect in the presence of Act/Chi resulting in similar, though delayed, E-cadherin and membrane β-catenin degradation compared to the DMSO control, and expression of Bra (Figure 5A and Additional file 7: Figure S5B). The combined effect of Act/Chi on Bra expression although unintuitive can be interpreted as following: Act loosens the adherens junctions, which releases a small amount of β-catenin from the membrane, and Chi amplifies this effect. However, when CsA is added in the presence of Chi, very little β-catenin can be released from the membrane since higher concentrations of Act are required for this process. In Act and CsA without the addition of Chi, there is no feedback (i.e. from Wnt secretion mediated by β-catenin), since β-catenin remains in the membrane. Finally, CsA in the presence of Act/Chi simply delays the EMT since the concentrations of Act/Chi are eventually sufficient to bypass the inhibitory effect of CsA.
Live imaging of cells under these conditions revealed that although cells treated with either Act or Chi in the presence of CsA begin to form membrane protrusions such as lamellipodial and filopodial projections, suggestive of EMT initiation ( and as confirmed with immunofluorescence), they remained within tight colonies and did not become motile (Figure 5B,C). This is supported by the quantitative analysis of the cell movements over time (velocities; Figure 5D,E and Additional file 7: Figure S5C), which revealed that cells treated with CsA are unable to show the rapid cell motion observed in the DMSO controls, even in the presence of Act/Chi, and were more likely to move under 36 μm/h (the basal velocity of cells) for prolonged periods of time and were retarded in their ability to engage in large cell-steps under all conditions (Figure 5D,E).
These results, in combination with the chemical genetics approach above, revealed that partial or complete loss of β-catenin and disruption of its transcriptional activity impair the ability of ESCs to both up-regulate and undergo specification towards a primitive-streak-like fate.
Nanog is required for the effect of brachyury on the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
Our previous analysis on the correlations between Nanog and Bra expression (Figure 3D,G) and a previous investigation of human ESCs detailing Nanog regulation of Bra  led us to follow the ability of Nanog−/− mESCs to express Bra and undergo EMT by both live-cell imaging and QIA (Additional file 8: Figure S6). QIA analysis shows that following differentiation in Act/Chi, Nanog−/− mESCs express much lower levels of Bra and Sox2 (Additional file 8: Figure S6B). Live imaging of these cells by widefield microscopy revealed that they undergo an EMT (Additional file 8: Figure S6C), although subtle differences can be observed in the dynamics of cell movements and in the morphology associated with their differentiation (Additional file 8: Figure S6C,D,E): analysis of the instant velocities revealed that Nanog−/− mESCs were less likely to engage in rapid velocities compared with the WT cells although not to the same extent as the β-catenin−/− line (Additional file 8: Figure S6D,E). These observations suggest that Nanog facilitates the up-regulation of Bra, though its presence is not a requirement for the initiation of the EMT program.
Brachyury expression is required for rapid cell movement following an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
In all conditions, Bra−/− cells were able to display the characteristics of an EMT, although the proportion of cells undergoing these changes appeared lower than the WT cells and the process was defective. In the presence of Act and Chi, although mutant lines were able to display movements associated with an EMT, immunofluorescent staining revealed that in most cells, the degradation of E-cadherin and the subsequent nuclear localization of β-catenin were impaired (Figure 7B). Nonetheless, by 48 h there was a clear decrease of E-cadherin in the membrane and some β-catenin above background in the nuclei (Figure 7B). Manual tracking of the mutant cells over the time course revealed their average instant velocity in Act and Act/Chi to be slower than the control Bra::GFP cells (Figure 7C,D and Additional file 9: Figure S7; Bra::GFP cells from Figure 4) and therefore the distance travelled per time step was less than for the control cells (Figure 7D). Interestingly, the effect of Chi on the Bra mutant cells was not as pronounced as that seen in Act or Act/Chi conditions: the probability of generating high velocities with Bra mutants was similar to the control cells with Chi treatment (Figure 7D).
These observations indicate that Bra is not necessary for the EMT, but functions to promote high-velocity motion within Bra-expressing cells, possibly facilitating their exit from the primitive streak. Together with the inhibitor studies and live-cell imaging of reporter cell lines, these data suggest that Bra, under the control of β-catenin, modulates the instant velocities of the cells as they enter the primitive streak fate and may control the expression of a factor or factors that allow progression of the EMT and therefore specification of the primitive streak. It also shows that, for the most part, the effect of Chi on cell movement is not significant and is independent of Bra expression.
It is thought that ESCs provide a unique model system for interrogating developmental processes in culture ,. However, this possibility rests on the assumption that processes in tissue culture mimic events in the embryo and this has not yet been adequately tested. Here we have applied a combination of live-cell microscopy, QIA and FACS to investigate the onset and consequences of Bra expression in differentiating mESCs and analyse to what extent they reflect related events in embryos. In contrast to earlier studies, which have been performed at the level of bulk populations of differentiating cells and mostly focused on gene expression, we have analysed the dynamics and correlation between gene expression and cell behaviour at the level of single cells. Our idea is to compare the events in culture with the specification and morphogenetic activity of a related population of cells in the embryo: the primitive streak.
In the mouse embryo, the expression of Bra is tightly linked to the process of gastrulation and body extension, in particular, to a population of cells in the epiblast that experience a wave of EMTs associated with directional movement -. This population sows the precursors for the definitive endoderm and the mesoderm and plays a central role in laying down the axial structure of mammalian embryos ,,,. Throughout gastrulation, Bra is expressed transiently within a moving population of cells, and a similar pulse of expression has been inferred from FACS analysis of cultured ESCs under the influence of Act and β-catenin signalling ,,. We have confirmed this observation and extended it by showing that the onset of Bra expression is autonomous in cells and that, like in the embryo, it is associated with an EMT ,,. Furthermore, we observe in culture that after the EMT, as cells become migratory, they lay down an extracellular matrix (ECM) over which they move. This situation mimics the embryo where cells move over a bed of fibronectin, which has been shown to be important for fate specification ,,. In the embryo, it is difficult to resolve the source of the fibronectin, as it could be the epiblast or the ingressing cells. Our results would suggest that it is the ingressing cells that have expressed Bra that make an important contribution to laying down the ECM.
In mESCs the expression of Bra is confined to a narrow temporal window, between days 3 and 4. If one assumes that mESCs are in a state similar to that of the pre-implantation blastocyst (stage E4.0), the timing of Bra expression in differentiating mESCs, 2 days later, is similar to that of embryos between E6.5 and E7.0, the time at which gastrulation commences ,. There are other features of the process in culture that parallel events in the embryo. In particular, the association of Bra expression with β-catenin signalling ,,, an EMT and the coexpression of both Nanog and Oct4 with Bra during these processes ,. There are reports that in human ESCs, Nanog is required for Bra expression  and here we have shown that the same is true in mESCs where the absence of Nanog dramatically reduces the expression of Bra and affects the behaviour of the cells.
Altogether, our observations support and extend the notion that in vitro differentiation of ESCs into a Bra-expressing population, exhibits several parallels with the definition and behaviour of the primitive streak during mammalian gastrulation beyond gene expression profiles ,. This opens up the possibility of using ESCs to probe the molecular mechanisms linking cell fate and cell behaviour and, by comparing the evolution of the processes in cells and embryos, gain some insights into the emergence of collective behaviour from the activities of single cells.
Our results suggest an interplay between Act and Wnt/β-catenin signalling, the EMT and the activity of Bra in the specification and behaviour of cells in the primitive streak. Act initiates the EMT and the expression of Bra. The EMT triggers Wnt/β-catenin signalling, which enhances the effect of Act on Bra, which, in turn, promotes cell movement and cell fate ,. This module has the structure of a feed-forward loop. In agreement, Bra has been shown to control the expression of several components of the cytoskeleton and canonical/non-canonical Wnt signalling ,-, which are likely to promote movement and enhance the EMT. Downstream targets of Bra comprise members of the Wnt family, which are likely to fuel movement. It is possible that the sluggish movement that we observe in the absence of Bra, is due to the activation of β-catenin by Chi, which might set in motion some of these mechanisms in a Bra-independent manner. In the absence of other elements, also controlled by Bra, the movement is greatly hampered.
A tissue culture model for primitive streak formation?
Differences between the events in the embryo and those in differentiating mESCs can be informative. An example is provided by the long-range movement that we observe in differentiating mESCs, which is not obvious in the embryo. During gastrulation, after their EMT, cells expressing Bra do not display long-range movement as individuals but rather jostle as a group towards the proximal posterior pole and then ingress through the primitive streak . However, when they are explanted and placed onto ECM-covered culture dishes, the same cells can be observed to move individually, without a preferred direction but with some persistence/diffusivity  in a manner that is very reminiscent to what we have described here for differentiating mESCs. These observations suggest that the main difference between Bra-expressing mESCs and those in the embryo, is the confinement of the latter, which restricts their movement and forces them to behave as a coherent collective, rather than becoming dispersed individual cells, as they do in the culture. It is interesting that the average velocity of the differentiating ESCs cells in Act/Chi (maximum average instant velocity of approximately 60 μm/h; Figure 4B') is within the same order of magnitude as that of the cells from primitive streak explants (average of 50 μm/h on ECM-coated surfaces)  and of migrating mesodermal cells within the embryo (46 μm/h) . It is important to note that in our experiments, we were only able to see a small proportion of cells, which were able to travel at approximately 400 μm/h, albeit for short durations of time (Figure 4B').
We observe a correlation between the level of Bra and the velocity of the cell. Bra mutant cells are very much delayed in migrating. Only a few do migrate and when they do, they exhibit lower velocities relative to WT. Similar observations have been made for cells from Bra mutant primitive streaks  and indicate that an important function of Bra is to control the movement of the cells. On the other hand the combination of Act and chi promotes very high velocities, which, in the confinement of the embryo, can result in strong directional forces. It is important to note that other transcription factors may be required in addition to Bra for the sustained movement of cells out of the primitive streak. In support of this, mice deficient of msgn1, a direct target of Bra , have an enlarged tail bud and cells have defects in their ability to migrate away from the primitive streak .
These observations emphasize the importance of confinement in the behaviour of the cells in the primitive streak. At the onset of gastrulation, the epiblast is a highly packed dividing cell population. At this stage, movement towards and through the streak is likely to be due to large-scale, spatially constrained tectonic movements of the epiblast as a whole, with mechanical differences between the prospective anterior and posterior parts being responsible for the directional movement of the bulk population that has undergone EMT. Indeed imaging gastrulation in mouse embryos suggests that once cells have undergone EMT, Bra-expressing cells are pushed towards the streak in a process that appears to be passive and not require convergence and extension, as appears to be the case for frogs and fish . This notion of morphogenetic events underpinned by long-range mechanical coordination of cells within tissues has been demonstrated during the convergence and extension movements of the neuroectoderm in the development of the nervous system in zebrafish . Such long-range effects might provide an explanation for the lack of a clear phenotype of Bra mutant cells during gastrulation. While this is likely to be the result of partial redundancy with eomesodermin -, it might be also be a reflection that at these early stages, the defects of Bra mutant cells are compensated by, mechanical large tissue coordination due to confinement. Bra mutant cells still undergo an EMT and therefore could be subject to these movements. As we have shown here, Bra mutant cells can initiate an EMT and therefore could be the subject of strong large-scale forces, which are likely to exist throughout the epiblast. After node formation, however, the strength of these forces might subside and regressing cells, particularly during axis extension, may come to rely more on the propulsion and navigational abilities driven by Bra. This is supported by the behaviour of mosaics of cells with different levels of Bra in WT embryos ,, and by our observation of a correlation between levels of Bra expression and cell velocity. Also, in agreement with this, WT cells are outcompeted by cells expressing higher levels of Bra in the early gastrula . Therefore, cells with higher motility might be more prone to escape the tectonic movements of the tissue and can `overtake' WT cells.
Our results highlight the experimental possibilities provided by differentiating ESC as a first approximation to understanding the mechanisms underlying events that, like gastrulation, are difficult to access in the embryo. Having established the similarities between the two systems, it will be important to exploit them to see how one could reproduce the primitive streak in culture through, for example, confining the movement of differentiating ESCs and attempting to create directionality by imposing spatially constrained forces.
Routine cell culture and primitive streak differentiation
E14-Tg2A, Bra::GFP , Bra−/−, TLC2  and Nanog−/− mESCs were cultured on gelatin in serum and LIF (ESLIF). β-catenin−/− and β-cateninΔC mESCs  were cultured in 2iLIF  on fibronectin. For differentiation assays, cells were plated in ESLIF (6 × 103 cells/cm2) and 24 h later the medium was replaced with N2B27  (NDiff 227, StemCells Inc., Cambridge, UK) supplemented with LB. Cells were differentiated 24 h later in N2B27 with combinations of Act (100 ng/ml), Chi (3 μm) or dual stimulation (Act/Chi). Differentiation of β-catenin−/− and β-cateninΔC lines omitted the LB stage. Small molecule inhibitors used were: 1 μm XAV939 , 1 μm IWP3 , CsA  (5 μm), 10 μm SB43  and 0.2 μm dorsomorphin (DM) . If cells were not being passaged, they were fed daily by replacing half the medium in the tissue culture flask with fresh growth medium. The cells used here are all 129 strain derived from C57BL/6 mice and we did not see any qualitative differences for when they exhibited the different morphogenetic behaviours or the way they moved or differentiated. We therefore expect a lower degree of variation between these and control lines than between other WT cells not derived from C57BL/6 mice.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis
GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) and RFP (Red Fluorescent Protein) was assessed using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK). Analysis of data from single, live cells (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-negative) was conducted using Flowjo software (Tree Star, Inc, Oregon, USA). The GFP-positive populations from FACS data were analysed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's adjustment comparing the time-matched DMSO control and treatment. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
Quantitative image analysis and confocal microscopy
Immunofluorescence and image analysis were carried out as described previously  in eight-well (Ibidi, Thistle Scientific LTD, Glasgow, UK), plastic tissue-culture dishes, within 200 μl medium/well. Primary antibodies are as follows: goat-anti-Bra (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Heidelberg, Germany, sc-17743), rabbit-anti-β-catenin (total β-catenin, Sigma-Aldrich Company LTD., Dorset, UK, C2206), rat-anti-E-cadherin (Takara Bio Europe/SAS, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France, M108), rabbit-anti-fibronectin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 2413), rat-anti-Nanog (eBiosciences Ltd, Hatfield, UK, 14–5761), mouse-anti-Oct3/4 (Santa Cruz, N3038) and rabbit-anti-Sox2 (Millipore, Dundee, UK, AB5603). Alexa-conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and Hoechst3342 (Invitrogen) were used to stain F-actin and nuclei, respectively. Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen. Samples were imaged using an LSM700 on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M with a 40× EC Plan-NeoFluar 1.3 NA DIC oil-immersion objective. Hoechst3342, Alexa-488, −568 and −633/647 were sequentially excited with 405, 488, 555 and 639 nm diode lasers respectively. Data capture was carried out using Zen2010 v6 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Ltd, Cambridge UK) and image analysis performed using Fiji .
Widefield live-cell microscopy and analysis
For live imaging, cells were imaged by widefield microscopy in a humidified CO2 incubator (37°C, 5% CO2) every 10 minutes for up to 96 h using a 20× LD Plan-Neofluar 0.4 NA Ph2 objective with correction collar set to image through tissue-culture plastic dishes. Illumination was provided by an LED white-light system (Laser2000, Kettering, UK). The filter cubes GFP-1828A-ZHE (Semrock, NY, USA) and Filter Set 45 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Ltd. Cambridge, UK) were used for GFP and RFP respectively. Emitted light was recorded using an AxioCam MRm and recorded with Axiovision (2010) release 4.8.2. Analyses were performed using Fiji  and associated plugins: MTrackJ  or Circadian Gene Expression (CGE) ,. When MTrackJ was used, the bright-field channel from the live-cell imaging was used to identify cell nuclei manually, the centre of which was used as a seed point for the position of the cells. Single cells were then tracked until they divided, became obscured by other cells or left the field of view. Additional file 10: Table S1 summarizes the tracking data collected. To measure the level of reporter expression, a small circular region of interest of radius 10 μm was automatically generated around the centre of each cell and the average pixel intensity from the fluorescence channel was recorded. Movies not included in the supplementary data are available upon request.
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
Cells were harvested at the relevant time points. RNA was extracted in TRIzol (Life Technologies, UK) and purified using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed with 1 μg of total RNA extract using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies). RNA was digested afterwards with RNaseH. PCR reactions were run in triplicate using 12.5 μl QuantiFAST SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen), 3 μl cDNA, 0.5 μl primer mix (50 μm) and 9 μl dH2O. Pipetting was performed automatically by QIAgility (Qiagen). Initial sample concentrations were estimated using an in-house adapted MAK2 method . Technical repeats were averaged and normalized to GAPDH levels. Standard errors were propagated accordingly. Primer pairs are as follows: brachyury forward CTGGGAGCTCAGTTCTTTCG, reverse GTCCACGAGGCTATGAGGAG; GAPDH forward AACTTTGGCATTGTGGAAGG, reverse GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTCT. Cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds and combined annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 seconds. Melt curves were generated between 60 and 95°C, holding for 5 seconds for each temperature step.
activin A + chiron
arbitrary fluorescence units
bone morphogenetic factor
embryonic stem cell
medium containing serum and LIF
fluorescence-activated cell sorting
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
green fluorescent protein
leukaemia inhibitory factor and bone morphogenetic factor
leukaemia inhibitory factor
mouse embryonic stem cell
quantitative image analysis
red fluorescent protein
quantitative real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction
nodal/Act receptor inhibitor SB431542
We thank F Bonkhofer for assistance with qRT-PCR, Drs A K Hadjantonakis, P Hayward, PF Machado, S Muñoz-Descalzo and C Schröter and the AMA lab for comments and discussions, Daniel Martinez Gatell for assistance in the manual tracking of cells, Carl Zeiss for technical support, G Keller for providing the Bra::GFP line, K Hadjantonakis for the TCF/LEF-mCherry cell line and V Wilson for the Bra mutant cell line. This research is funded by an ERC advanced grant to AMA. This article was previously made available on the BioRxiv preprint server .
- Wolpert L, Tickle C: Principles of Development. 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- Martinez Arias A, Stewart A: Molecular Principles of Animal Development. 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert SF: Developmental Biology. 2013, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, Sinauer Associates IncGoogle Scholar
- Ramkumar N, Anderson KV: SnapShot: mouse primitive streak. Cell. 2011, 146: 488-10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solnica-Krezel L, Sepich DS: Gastrulation: making and shaping germ layers. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012, 28: 687-717. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154043.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tam PPL, Gad JM: Gastrulation in the mouse embryo. Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryo. Edited by: Stern CD. 2004, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 731-1Google Scholar
- Nowotschin S, Hadjantonakis A-K: Cellular dynamics in the early mouse embryo: from axis formation to gastrulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010, 20: 420-427. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.05.008.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fehling HJ, Lacaud G, Kubo A, Kennedy M, Robertson S, Keller G, Kouskoff V: Tracking mesoderm induction and its specification to the hemangioblast during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development. 2003, 130: 4217-4227. 10.1242/dev.00589.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rivera-Pérez JA, Magnuson T: Primitive streak formation in mice is preceded by localized activation of brachyury and Wnt3. Dev Biol. 2005, 288: 363-371. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beddington RS, Rashbass P, Wilson V: Brachyury – a gene affecting mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Dev Suppl. 1992, 166: 157-165.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson DG, Bhatt S, Herrmann BG: Expression pattern of the mouse T gene and its role in mesoderm formation. Nature. 1990, 343: 657-659. 10.1038/343657a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold SJ, Robertson EJ: Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 10: 91-103. 10.1038/nrm2618.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim J, Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: insights from development. Development. 2012, 139: 3471-3486. 10.1242/dev.071209.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thiery JP, Sleeman JP: Complex networks orchestrate epithelial–mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 131-142. 10.1038/nrm1835.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams M, Burdsal C, Periasamy A, Lewandoski M, Sutherland A: Mouse primitive streak forms in situ by initiation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition without migration of a cell population. Dev Dyn. 2011, 241: 270-283. 10.1002/dvdy.23711.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Russ AP, Wattler S, Colledge WH, Aparicio S, Carlton MBL, Pearce JJ, Barton SC, Surani MA, Ryan K, Nehls MC: Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation. Nature. 2000, 404: 95-98. 10.1038/35003601.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robb L, Hartley L, Begley CG, Brodnicki TC, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Elefanty AG: Cloning, expression analysis, and chromosomal localization of murine and human homologues of a Xenopus mix gene. Dev Dyn. 2000, 219: 497-504. 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1070>3.0.CO;2-O.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beddington RS: Induction of a second neural axis by the mouse node. Development. 1994, 120: 613-620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JC: Role of T-box genes during gastrulation. Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryo. Edited by: Stern CD. 2004, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 731-1Google Scholar
- Wilson V, Rashbass P, Beddington RS: Chimeric analysis of T (brachyury) gene function. Development. 1993, 117: 1321-1331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cambray N, Wilson V: Two distinct sources for a population of maturing axial progenitors. Development. 2007, 134: 2829-2840. 10.1242/dev.02877.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gluecksohn-Schoenheimer S: The development of two tailless mutants in the house mouse. Genetics. 1938, 23: 573-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson V, Manson L, Skarnes W: The T gene is necessary for normal mesodermal morphogenetic cell movements during gastrulation. Development. 1995, 121: 877-886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin BL, Kimelman D: Regulation of canonical Wnt signaling by brachyury is essential for posterior mesoderm formation. Dev Cell. 2008, 15: 121-133. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.04.013.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tam PPL, Loebel DAF: Gene function in mouse embryogenesis: get set for gastrulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2007, 8: 368-381. 10.1038/nrg2084.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ichikawa T, Nakazato K, Keller PJ, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Stelzer EHK, Mochizuki A, Nonaka S: Live imaging of whole mouse embryos during gastrulation: migration analyses of epiblast and mesodermal cells. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e64506-10.1371/journal.pone.0064506.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans MJ, Kaufman MH: Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981, 292: 154-156. 10.1038/292154a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin GR: Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1981, 78: 7634-7638. 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hansson M, Olesen DR, Peterslund JML, Engberg N, Kahn M, Winzi M, Klein T, Maddox-Hyttel P, Serup P: A late requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling during activin-induced formation of foregut endoderm from mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 2009, 330: 286-304. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.026.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ying Q-L, Smith AG: Defined conditions for neural commitment and differentiation. Meth Enzymol. 2003, 365: 327-341. 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)65023-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ying Q-L, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A: BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell. 2003, 115: 281-292. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00847-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ying Q-L, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A: The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008, 453: 519-523. 10.1038/nature06968.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ying Q-L, Stavridis M, Griffiths D, Li M, Smith A: Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol. 2003, 21: 183-186. 10.1038/nbt780.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gadue P, Huber TL, Paddison PJ, Keller GM: Wnt and TGF-beta signaling are required for the induction of an in vitro model of primitive streak formation using embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006, 103: 16806-16811. 10.1073/pnas.0603916103.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kubo A, Shinozaki K, Shannon JM, Kouskoff V, Kennedy M, Woo S, Fehling HJ, Keller G: Development of definitive endoderm from embryonic stem cells in culture. Development. 2004, 131: 1651-1662. 10.1242/dev.01044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keller G: Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 1129-1155. 10.1101/gad.1303605.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobrovolskaia-Zavadskaia N: Sur la mortification spontanée de la queue chez la souris nouveau-née et sur l’existence d’un caractère (facteur) heriditaire “non-viable”. Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie. 1927, 97: 114-116.Google Scholar
- Rashbass P, Cooke LA, Herrmann BG, Beddington RS: A cell autonomous function of brachyury in T/T embryonic stem cell chimaeras. Nature. 1991, 353: 348-351. 10.1038/353348a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakaya Y, Sukowati EW, Wu Y, Sheng G: RhoA and microtubule dynamics control cell-basement membrane interaction in EMT during gastrulation. Nature. 2008, 10: 765-775.Google Scholar
- Malaguti M, Nistor PA, Blin G, Pegg A, Zhou X, Lowell S, Miller F: Bone morphogenic protein signalling suppresses differentiation of pluripotent cells by maintaining expression of E-cadherin. Elife. 2013, 2: e01197-10.7554/eLife.01197.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soncin F, Mohamet L, Eckardt D, Ritson S, Eastham AM, Bobola N, Russell A, Davies S, Kemler R, Merry CLR: Abrogation of E‐cadherin‐mediated cell–cell contact in mouse embryonic stem cells results in reversible LIF‐independent self‐renewal. Stem Cells. 2009, 27: 2069-2080. 10.1002/stem.134.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chou Y-F, Chen H-H, Eijpe M, Yabuuchi A, Chenoweth JG, Tesar P, Lu J, McKay RDG, Geijsen N: The growth factor environment defines distinct pluripotent ground states in novel blastocyst-derived stem cells. Cell. 2008, 135: 449-461. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.035.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Migeotte I, Grego-Bessa J, Anderson KV: Rac1 mediates morphogenetic responses to intercellular signals in the gastrulating mouse embryo. Development. 2011, 138: 3011-3020. 10.1242/dev.059766.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakaya Y, Sheng G: Epithelial to mesenchymal transition during gastrulation: an embryological view. Development Growth Diff. 2008, 50: 755-766. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01070.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomson M, Liu SJ, Zou L-N, Smith Z, Meissner A, Ramanathan S: Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers. Cell. 2011, 145: 875-889. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trott J, Arias AM: Single cell lineage analysis of mouse embryonic stem cells at the exit from pluripotency. Biology Open. 2013, 2: 1049-1056. 10.1242/bio.20135934.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hart AH, Hartley L, Ibrahim M, Robb L: Identification, cloning and expression analysis of the pluripotency promoting Nanog genes in mouse and human. Dev Dyn. 2004, 230: 187-198. 10.1002/dvdy.20034.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, Robertson M, Vrana J, Jones K, Grotewold L, Smith A: Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature. 2007, 450: 1230-1234. 10.1038/nature06403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Osorno R, Tsakiridis A, Wong F, Cambray N, Economou C, Wilkie R, Blin G, Scotting PJ, Chambers I, Wilson V: The developmental dismantling of pluripotency is reversed by ectopic Oct4 expression. Development. 2012, 139: 2288-2298. 10.1242/dev.078071.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold SJ, Stappert J, Bauer A, Kispert A, Herrmann BG, Kemler R: Brachyury is a target gene of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Mech Dev. 2000, 91: 249-258. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00309-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi TP, Takada S, Yoshikawa Y, Wu N, McMahon AP: T (brachyury) is a direct target of Wnt3a during paraxial mesoderm specification. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 3185-3190. 10.1101/gad.13.24.3185.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faunes F, Hayward P, Descalzo SM, Chatterjee SS, Balayo T, Trott J, Christoforou A, Ferrer-Vaquer A, Hadjantonakis A-K, Dasgupta R, Arias AM: A membrane-associated β-catenin/Oct4 complex correlates with ground-state pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development. 2013, 140: 1171-1183. 10.1242/dev.085654.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferrer-Vaquer A, Piliszek A, Tian G, Aho RJ, Dufort D, Hadjantonakis A-K: A sensitive and bright single-cell resolution live imaging reporter of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the mouse. BMC Dev Biol. 2010, 10: 121-10.1186/1471-213X-10-121.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clipstone NA, Crabtree GR: Identification of calcineurin as a key signalling enzyme in T-lymphocyte activation. Nature. 1992, 357: 695-697. 10.1038/357695a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Zhu L, Yang A, Lin J, Tang F, Jin S, Wei Z, Li J, Jin Y: Calcineurin-NFAT signaling critically regulates early lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells and embryos. Stem Cell. 2011, 8: 46-58.Google Scholar
- Mancini M, Toker A: NFAT proteins: emerging roles in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 810-820. 10.1038/nrc2735.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yilmaz M, Christofori G: EMT, the cytoskeleton, and cancer cell invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009, 28: 15-33. 10.1007/s10555-008-9169-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu P, Pan G, Yu J, Thomson JA: FGF2 sustains NANOG and switches the outcome of BMP4-induced human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2011, 8: 326-334. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.01.001.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Z, Huangfu D: Human pluripotent stem cells: an emerging model in developmental biology. Development. 2013, 140: 705-717. 10.1242/dev.086165.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murry CE, Keller G: Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell. 2008, 132: 661-680. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson V, Beddington R: Expression of T protein in the primitive streak is necessary and sufficient for posterior mesoderm movement and somite differentiation. Dev Biol. 1997, 192: 45-58. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8701.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villegas SN, Rothová M, Barrios-Llerena ME, Pulina M, Hadjantonakis A-K, Le Bihan T, Astrof S, Brickman JM: PI3K/Akt1 signalling specifies foregut precursors by generating regionalized extra-cellular matrix. Elife. 2013, 2: e00806-10.7554/eLife.00806.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng P, Andersen P, Hassel D, Kaynak BL, Limphong P, Juergensen L, Kwon C, Srivastava D: Fibronectin mediates mesendodermal cell fate decisions. Development. 2013, 140: 2587-2596. 10.1242/dev.089052.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snow M: Gastrulation in the mouse: growth and regionalization of the epiblast. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977, 42: 293-303.Google Scholar
- Tada M, Smith JC: Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway. Development. 2000, 127: 2227-2238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman JA, Wu C-I, Merrill BJ: Tcf7l1 prepares epiblast cells in the gastrulating mouse embryo for lineage specification. Development. 2013, 140: 1665-1675. 10.1242/dev.087387.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Izumi N, Era T, Akimaru H, Yasunaga M, Nishikawa S-I: Dissecting the molecular hierarchy for mesendoderm differentiation through a combination of embryonic stem cell culture and RNA interference. Stem Cells. 2007, 25: 1664-1674. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0681.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentsch GE, Owens NDL, Martin SR, Piccinelli P, Faial T, Trotter MWB, Gilchrist MJ, Smith JC: In vivo T-box transcription factor profiling reveals joint regulation of embryonic neuromesodermal bipotency. Cell Rep. 2013, 4: 1185-1196. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans AL, Faial T, Gilchrist MJ, Down T, Vallier L, Pedersen RA, Wardle FC, Smith JC: Genomic targets of brachyury (T) in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e33346-10.1371/journal.pone.0033346.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shimoda M, Sugiura T, Imajyo I, Ishii K, Chigita S, Seki K, Kobayashi Y, Shirasuna K: The T-box transcription factor brachyury regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in association with cancer stem-like cells in adenoid cystic carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2012, 12: 377-10.1186/1471-2407-12-377.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardy KM, Garriock RJ, Yatskievych TA, D'Agostino SL, Antin PB, Krieg PA: Non-canonical Wnt signaling through Wnt5a/b and a novel Wnt11 gene, Wnt11b, regulates cell migration during avian gastrulation. Dev Biol. 2008, 320: 391-401. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.546.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heisenberg CP, Tada M, Rauch G, Saude L: Silberblick/Wnt 11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 2000, 405: 76-81. 10.1038/35011068.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hashimoto K, Fujimoto H, Nakatsuji N: An ECM substratum allows mouse mesodermal cells isolated from the primitive streak to exhibit motility similar to that inside the embryo and reveals a deficiency in the T/T mutant cells. Development. 1987, 100: 587-598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakatsuji N, Snow MH, Wylie CC: Cinemicrographic study of the cell movement in the primitive-streak-stage mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986, 96: 99-109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wittler L, Shin E-H, Grote P, Kispert A, Beckers A, Gossler A, Werber M, Herrmann BG: Expression of Msgn1 in the presomitic mesoderm is controlled by synergism of WNT signalling and Tbx6. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8: 784-789. 10.1038/sj.embor.7401030.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nowotschin S, Ferrer-Vaquer A, Concepcion D, Papaioannou VE, Hadjantonakis A-K: Interaction of Wnt3a, Msgn1 and Tbx6 in neural versus paraxial mesoderm lineage commitment and paraxial mesoderm differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2012, 367: 1-14. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.012.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blanchard GB, Kabla AJ, Schultz NL, Butler LC, Sanson B, Gorfinkiel N, Mahadevan L, Adams RJ: Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nat Chem Biol. 2009, 6: 458-464.Google Scholar
- Slagle CE, Aoki T, Burdine RD: Nodal-dependent mesendoderm specification requires the combinatorial activities of FoxH1 and eomesodermin. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1002072-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002072.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teo AKK, Arnold SJ, Trotter MWB, Brown S, Ang LT, Chng Z, Robertson EJ, Dunn NR, Vallier L: Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin. Genes Dev. 2011, 25: 238-250. 10.1101/gad.607311.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold SJ, Hofmann UK, Bikoff EK, Robertson EJ: Pivotal roles for eomesodermin during axis formation, epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition and endoderm specification in the mouse. Development. 2008, 135: 501-511. 10.1242/dev.014357.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wray J, Kalkan T, Gomez-Lopez S, Eckardt D, Cook A, Kemler R, Smith A: Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation. Nat Cell Biol. 2011, 13: 838-845. 10.1038/ncb2267.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang S-MA, Mishina YM, Liu S, Cheung A, Stegmeier F, Michaud GA, Charlat O, Wiellette E, Zhang Y, Wiessner S, Hild M, Shi X, Wilson CJ, Mickanin C, Myer V, Fazal A, Tomlinson R, Serluca F, Shao W, Cheng H, Shultz M, Rau C, Schirle M, Schlegl J, Ghidelli S, Fawell S, Lu C, Curtis D, Kirschner MW, Lengauer C, et al: Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes Wnt signalling. Nature. 2009, 461: 614-620. 10.1038/nature08356.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen B, Dodge ME, Tang W, Lu J, Ma Z, Fan C-W, Wei S, Hao W, Kilgore J, Williams NS, Roth MG, Amatruda JF, Chen C, Lum L: Small molecule–mediated disruption of Wnt-dependent signaling in tissue regeneration and cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2009, 5: 100-107. 10.1038/nchembio.137.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inman GJ, Nicolás FJ, Callahan JF, Harling JD, Gaster LM, Reith AD, Laping NJ, Hill CS: SB-431542 is a potent and specific inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β superfamily type I activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors ALK4, ALK5, and ALK7. Mol Pharmacol. 2002, 62: 65-74. 10.1124/mol.62.1.65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu PB, Hong CC, Sachidanandan C, Babitt JL, Deng DY, Hoyng SA, Lin HY, Bloch KD, Peterson RT: Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism. Nat Chem Biol. 2007, 4: 33-41. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.54.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Descalzo SM, Rué P, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Arias AM: Correlations between the levels of Oct4 and Nanog as a signature for naïve pluripotency in mouse ES cells. Stem Cells. 2012, 30: 2683-2691. 10.1002/stem.1230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B: Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Meth. 2012, 9: 676-682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I: Methods for cell and particle tracking. Meth Enzymol. 2012, 504: 183-200. 10.1016/B978-0-12-391857-4.00009-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sage D, Unser M, Salmon P, Dibner C: A software solution for recording circadian oscillator features in time-lapse live cell microscopy. Cell Division. 2010, 5: 17-10.1186/1747-1028-5-17.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dibner C, Sage D, Unser M, Bauer C, D'Eysmond T, Naef F, Schibler U: Circadian gene expression is resilient to large fluctuations in overall transcription rates. EMBO J. 2009, 28: 123-134. 10.1038/emboj.2008.262.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boggy GJ, Woolf PJ: A mechanistic model of PCR for accurate quantification of quantitative PCR data. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12355-10.1371/journal.pone.0012355.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Previous version of this article on the BioRxiv preprint server. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/003871]
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.