Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of I-TASSER modeling on benchmark II in comparison with TOUCHSTONE-II [12]

From: Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations

    Cα-RMSD (Å) of TOUCHSTONE-II models Cα-RMSD (Å) (TM-score) of I-TASSER models
Protein name Length (residues) Secondary structure Best in top five clusters First cluster Best in top five clusters
1gpt_ 47 αβ 4.0 5.2 (0.54) 3.8 (0.56)
1tfi_ 47 β 6.2 4.6 (0.56) 4.0 (0.57)
1bq9A 53 β 4.8 7.3 (0.41) 5.0 (0.46)
1pgx_ 59 αβ 6.0 3.1 (0.55) 3.1 (0.55)
1ah9_ 63 β 5.1 4.3 (0.56) 2.8 (0.67)
1aoy_ 65 α 4.7 4.5 (0.70) 2.7 (0.70)
1sro_ 71 β 4.3 3.4 (0.66) 3.0 (0.68)
1kjs_ 74 α 8.2 8.5 (0.38) 5.7 (0.50)
1vcc_ 76 αβ 7.3 5.7 (0.44) 5.7 (0.44)
1npsA 88 αβ 3.4 2.1 (0.79) 2.1 (0.79)
1hbkA 89 α 8.5 3.5 (0.69) 3.5 (0.69)
1cy5A 92 α 1.8 1.5 (0.89) 1.5 (0.89)
1bm8_ 99 αβ 9.0 6.3 (0.42) 6.3 (0.42)
2pcy_ 99 β 4.3 4.6 (0.66) 4.6 (0.66)
256bA 106 α 3.2 3.4 (0.77) 3.4 (0.77)
1cewI 108 αβ 6.3 3.6 (0.73) 3.6 (0.73)
1thx_ 108 αβ 2.3 2.1 (0.83) 2.1 (0.83)
1sfp_ 111 β 6.0 5.1 (0.75) 5.1 (0.75)
1gnuA 117 αβ 9.3 8.2 (0.58) 6.5 (0.60)
2a0b_ 118 α 12.8 2.5 (0.81) 2.5 (0.81)
Average 85   5.9 4.5 (0.64) 3.9 (0.65)