Table 2 Summary of I-TASSER modeling on benchmark II in comparison with TOUCHSTONE-II [12]
From: Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations
|  |  |  | Cα-RMSD (Å) of TOUCHSTONE-II models | Cα-RMSD (Å) (TM-score) of I-TASSER models | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein name | Length (residues) | Secondary structure | Best in top five clusters | First cluster | Best in top five clusters |
1gpt_ | 47 | αβ | 4.0 | 5.2 (0.54) | 3.8 (0.56) |
1tfi_ | 47 | β | 6.2 | 4.6 (0.56) | 4.0 (0.57) |
1bq9A | 53 | β | 4.8 | 7.3 (0.41) | 5.0 (0.46) |
1pgx_ | 59 | αβ | 6.0 | 3.1 (0.55) | 3.1 (0.55) |
1ah9_ | 63 | β | 5.1 | 4.3 (0.56) | 2.8 (0.67) |
1aoy_ | 65 | α | 4.7 | 4.5 (0.70) | 2.7 (0.70) |
1sro_ | 71 | β | 4.3 | 3.4 (0.66) | 3.0 (0.68) |
1kjs_ | 74 | α | 8.2 | 8.5 (0.38) | 5.7 (0.50) |
1vcc_ | 76 | αβ | 7.3 | 5.7 (0.44) | 5.7 (0.44) |
1npsA | 88 | αβ | 3.4 | 2.1 (0.79) | 2.1 (0.79) |
1hbkA | 89 | α | 8.5 | 3.5 (0.69) | 3.5 (0.69) |
1cy5A | 92 | α | 1.8 | 1.5 (0.89) | 1.5 (0.89) |
1bm8_ | 99 | αβ | 9.0 | 6.3 (0.42) | 6.3 (0.42) |
2pcy_ | 99 | β | 4.3 | 4.6 (0.66) | 4.6 (0.66) |
256bA | 106 | α | 3.2 | 3.4 (0.77) | 3.4 (0.77) |
1cewI | 108 | αβ | 6.3 | 3.6 (0.73) | 3.6 (0.73) |
1thx_ | 108 | αβ | 2.3 | 2.1 (0.83) | 2.1 (0.83) |
1sfp_ | 111 | β | 6.0 | 5.1 (0.75) | 5.1 (0.75) |
1gnuA | 117 | αβ | 9.3 | 8.2 (0.58) | 6.5 (0.60) |
2a0b_ | 118 | α | 12.8 | 2.5 (0.81) | 2.5 (0.81) |
Average | 85 | Â | 5.9 | 4.5 (0.64) | 3.9 (0.65) |