Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistics of visual pigment templates fit to spectral sensitivity curves

From: Functional diversity in the color vision of cichlid fishes

  Gender Fish ID Visual pigment templatea A2%b 1st R2c 2nd R2d Subsete
    SWS1 SWS2b SWS2a RH2b RH2a LWS     
M. zebra Female ZF7 381 (0.62) 427 (0.63)   491 (0.76) 535 (0.90)   37.6 RH2a (0.98) LWS (0.47) 1
   ZF6 381 (0.46) 427 (0.82)   491 (0.70) 535 (0.90)   37.6 RH2a (0.98) LWS (0.21) 1
   ZF8 383 (0.88) 428 (0.55)   494 (0.73) 540 (0.87)   53.8 RH2a (0.94) LWS (0.59) 1
   ZF1 383 (0.09)   461 (0.96) 493 (0.72) 540 (0.85)   48.4 RH2a (0.95) LWS (0.58) 2
   ZF4 379 (0.91)   459 (0.30) 487 (0.69) 530 (0.94)   21.5 RH2a (0.93) LWS (0.01) 2
   ZF2 375 (0.53)   461 (0.98) 493 (0.38) 540 (0.96)   48.4 RH2a (0.95) LWS (0.56) 2
  Male ZM2 375 (0.85)   457 (0.76) 484 (0.85) 526 (0.91)   8 RH2a (0.89) LWS (0.49) 2
   ZM6 378 (0.75)   458 (0.57) 487 (0.81) 530 (0.95)   18.8 RH2a (0.97) LWS (-0.18) 2
   ZM4 383 (0.15)   463 (0.64) 494 (0.54) 540(0.91)   53.7 RH2a (0.99) LWS (0.62) 2
   ZM1 385 (0.55)   463 (0.99) 495 (0.93) 544 (0.55)   59.1 RH2a (0.91) LWS (0.64) 2
   ZM3 378 (0.69)   458 (0.18) 487 (0.91) 530 (0.79)   18.8 RH2a (0.91) LWS (-0.69) 2
M. auratus Female AF13 374 (0.84) 424 (0.70)   485 (0.82) 525 (0.72) 561 (0.87) 0 LWS (0.85)   3
   AF15 374 (0.25) 424 (0.75)   485 (0.43) 525 (0.14) 561 (0.82) 0 LWS (0.85)   3
   AF14 380 (0.76)   463 (0.33) 494 (0.81) 543 (0.71)   53.7 RH2a (0.91) LWS (0.24) 4
   AF11   429 (0.47)   497 (0.63) 547 (0.91)   64.5 RH2a (0.94) LWS (0.84) 5
  Male AM14 374 (0.71) 424 (0.96)   485 (0.41) 525 (0.70) 561 (0.85) 0 LWS (0.96)   3
   AM13 374 (0.67) 424 (0.60)   485 (0.73) 525 (0.74) 561 (0.85) 0 LWS (0.85)   3
   AM12 374 (0.54)   457 (0.85) 485 (0.41) 525 (0.27) 561 (0.98) 0 LWS (0.98)   6
   AM11   424 (0.32) 457 (0.09) 485 (0.85) 526 (0.43) 562 (0.57) 3 LWS (0.89)   7
   AM16   424 (0.56)   485 (0.41) 525 (0.47) 561 (0.70) 0 LWS (0.84)   8
   AM17   424 (0.97)   485 (0.70) 525 (0.29) 561 (0.88) 0 LWS (0.96)   8
   AM18    457 (0.52) 485 (0.33) 525 (0.46) 561 (0.87) 0 LWS (0.87)   9
P. taeniolatus Female TF6   428 (0.49) 457 (0.89) 491 (0.75) 533 (0.55) 576 (0.95) 18.1 LWS (0.86)   7
   TF2   428 (0.66) 457 (0.98) 487 (0.84) 528 (0.55) 571 (0.43) 10.6 LWS (0.63)   7
   TF1   428 (0.49) 457 (0.97) 48 (0.49)   571 (0.91) 15.1 LWS (0.98) RH2a (0.82) 10
   TF4   428 (0.48) 457 (0.54)   529 (0.88) 571 (0.72) 10.6 LWS (0.91)   11
   TF7 379 (0.81)   457 (0.47) 487 (0.63) 529 (0.54) 563 (0.73) 6 LWS (0.93)   6
  Male TM1   428 (0.68) 457 (0.64) 491 (0.59) 533 (0.52) 576 (0.88) 18.6 LWS (0.96)   7
   TM3   428 (0.71) 457 (0.08) 494 (0.89) 529 (0.59) 571 (0.98) 15 LWS (0.95)   7
   TM8   428 (0.59) 457 (0.94) 491 (0.90) 534 (0.49) 576 (0.80) 22.6 LWS (0.95)   7
   TM4   428 (0.64) 457 (0.91) 486 (0.84)   563 (0.98) 3 LWS (0.98) RH2a (0.96) 9
   TM6   428 (0.42) 457 (0.45) 487 (0.74)   571 (0.94) 10.7 LWS (0.97) RH2a (0.87) 9
   TM5 379 (0.78)   457 (0.84) 486 (0.50) 529 (0.57) 563 (0.91) 3 LWS (0.97)   6
   TM2 380 (0.95)   457 (0.99) 491 (0.67) 533 (0.87) 576 (0.99) 18.1 LWS (0.99)   6
  1. aλmax (nm) of Visual pigment template that were fitted to the sensitivity curve (R2 values of the template fits in parentheses). Owing to cone interactions, the sensitivity peaks measured were typically narrower than the fitted pigment templates, resulting in relatively low R2 values.
  2. bEstimated A2 percent in the retina (A2 percent = A2 proportion × 100).
  3. cThe visual pigment template that resulted in the highest R2 value when fitted to the long-wavelength limb of the spectral sensitivity curve (R2 value of the template fit in parentheses).
  4. dThe visual pigment template which resulted in the second highest R2 value when fitted to the long-wavelength limb of the spectral sensitivity curve (R2 value of the template fit in parentheses).
  5. eThe cone pigment subset to which each individual was assigned.