Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of hypoxia and hyperoxia selection on the coefficient of coincidence in adjacent intervals of the major chromosomes of D. melanogaster

From: Experimental evolution of recombination and crossover interference in Drosophila caused by directional selection for stress-related traits

Intervals Control Hypoxia χ2 ML P (control vs. hypoxia) Hyperoxia χ2 ML P (control vs. hyperoxia)
y-cv-v 0.712 ± 0.099 1.108 ± 0.078 8.88 1.1 × 10–2 0.883 ± 0.076 1.72 0.55
cv-v-f 0.737 ± 0.074 1.118 ± 0.056 16.07 2.8 × 10–4 1.200 ± 0.058 22.83 9.7 × 10–6
net-dp-b 0.332 ± 0.058 1.295 ± 0.062 96.20 7.9 × 10–22 1.014 ± 0.068 49.46 1.4 × 10–11
dp-b-pk 0.540 ± 0.097 1.195 ± 0.095 20.45 3.2 × 10–5 1.146 ± 0.107 16.42 2.3 × 10–4
b-pk-cn 0.301 ± 0.295 0.262 ± 0.258 0.01 1 0.643 ± 0.442 0.41 1
kn-c-sp 0.272 ± 0.129 0.179 ± 0.124 0.01 1 0.422 ± 0.148 0.84 0.97
c-px-sp 0.283 ± 0.078 0.253 ± 0.081 0.08 1 0.316 ± 0.083 0.08 1
ru-h-th 0.495 ± 0.103 0.995 ± 0.129 8.97 1.0 × 10–2 0.396 ± 0.097 0.44 1
h-th-cu 0.137 ± 0.095 0.598 ± 0.162 5.50 0.06 0.342 ± 0.148 1.42 0.60
  1. P values (two-tailed test) are based on unweighted likelihood tests for the difference between control and selection estimates, corrected for false discovery rate
  2. For more details, see Additional file 1: Table S3
  3. ML, Maximum likelihood