Table 2 Comparison between the number of transitions expected for each diagonal (95% CI) from the randomised sequences when replications (zero diagonal) were kept constant (in order to focus on transitions between calls; null model) and the observed sequences
Diagonal | 95%CI no. transitions (null) | Observed no. transitions | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
−6 (6 levels up) | 70–94 | 75 | As expected |
−5 (5 levels up) | 159–194 | 128 | Under |
−4 (4 levels up) | 424–477 | 441 | As expected |
−3 (3 levels up) | 424.9–490 | 386 | Under |
−2 (2 levels up) | 791.9–873.0 | 789 | Under |
−1 (1 level up) | 4612.9–4730.1 | 4849 | Over |
0 (repetition) | 13,049–13,049 | 13,049 | Kept constant |
1 (1 level down) | 4609.9–4730 | 4834 | Over |
2 (2 levels down) | 784.9–870 | 739 | Under |
3 (3 levels down) | 422–484 | 403 | Under |
4 (4 levels down) | 420.9–473 | 446 | As expected |
5 (5 levels down) | 154–193 | 156 | As expected |
6 (6 levels down) | 69–92 | 81 | As expected |