|
Constraints
|
Full model
|
Root
|
Sphenodontia
|
Sphenodontinae
|
Eilenodontinae
|
|---|
|
No constraints
| |
M
|
Rng HPD
|
M
|
Rng HPD
|
M
|
Rng HPD
|
M
|
Rng HPD
|
|
FBD+Start+LExct
|
325.0
|
87.8
|
285.5
|
76.5
|
189.7
|
17.9
|
164.2
|
18.5
|
|
FBD+Start+NoR
|
290.4
|
18
|
262.4
|
37.9
|
188.7
|
14.7
|
163.3
|
32.8
|
|
SFBD(s)2l+Start+NoR*
|
289.5
|
18.4
|
260.2
|
38.1
|
188.6
|
14.2
|
163.7
|
33.1
|
|
FBD+Start+LExct+NoR
|
290.7
|
18.8
|
262.5
|
38.3
|
188.7
|
14.8
|
163.2
|
32.8
|
|
SFBD(s)2l+Start+LExct+NoR
|
290.4
|
18.3
|
261.9
|
38.3
|
188.7
|
14.6
|
163.7
|
33.4
|
|
Clock rate + topology
|
FBD+NoR
|
287.8
|
17.4
|
261.8
|
32.9
|
188.1
|
12.5
|
164.6
|
33.7
|
|
FBD+LExct+NoR
|
287.9
|
17.4
|
262.0
|
32.7
|
188.2
|
12.6
|
164.7
|
34.1
|
- Results obtained under the FBD and SFBD tree models with a NoSA diversity taxon sampling strategy and the (best fit) autocorrelated relaxed clock model. More informative priors are implemented to reduce deep root attraction. Median values are reported given the very broad and skewed 95% HPD distributions. Values in bold highlight divergence times in stronger agreement with the fossil record (e.g., within the Permian for the root age), which also have narrower 95% HPD ranges. Abbreviations: M median value for node age, Rng HPD range between lower and upper bound values for the 95% HPD, S sampling strategy. *Model combination with the most conservative root age estimate (greatest agreement with the fossil record) without topology or rate constraints
