Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Biology

Fig. 3

From: Distinct nucleotide patterns among three subgenomes of bread wheat and their potential origins during domestication after allopolyploidization

Fig. 3

Base-composition pattern of different functional annotation sets. a The proportions of SNPs within 7 annotation sets. Comparison of [AT] values between intergenic SNPs and missense SNPs (left), and between non-genic SNPs and genic SNPs (right) in A (b), B (c), and D (d) subgenomes. For each plot, gray violins show [AT] values of intergenic SNPs (left) and non-genic SNPs (right), whereas the other colors indicate missense SNPs (left) and genic SNPs (right). The percentages within each plot show the contributions on [AT]-increase from wild progenitors to bread wheat. e Comparison of [AT] values between non-sweeps and sweeps on each chromosome. Both blue violins in each plot show [AT] values calculated with non-sweep SNPs (left) and sweep SNPs (right) of bread wheat landraces. Both gray violins in each plot show [AT] values calculated with non-sweep SNPs (left) and sweep SNPs (right) of wild emmer (A and B subgenomes) and Ae. tauschii (D subgenome)

Back to article page