Skip to main content
Fig. 1. | BMC Biology

Fig. 1.

From: Honeybee communication during collective defence is shaped by predation

Fig. 1.

Stinging response as a function of the pheromone concentration. a Stinging frequency of a bee as a function of the number of pulled stingers on the dummy. a’ Schematic of the behavioural assay (top view). The bee is facing a rotating dummy inside the arena, on which pulled stingers (red arrowheads) have been placed. b Stinging frequency of a bee as a function of the IAA concentration inside the arena. b’ Schematic of the behavioural assay (top view). The bee is facing a rotating dummy inside the arena, while the alarm pheromone is carried in by three air flows (red arrows). In both graphs, the shaded area corresponds to the 95% confidence interval, estimated from a binomial distribution with our sample size (126 and 72 bees for each point in a and b, respectively). Insets show photoionization detector (PID) measurements of the SAP and IAA concentrations, which are linearly correlated with both the number of stingers and the dilution factor

Back to article page