Skip to main content
Fig. 5. | BMC Biology

Fig. 5.

From: Honeybee communication during collective defence is shaped by predation

Fig. 5.

Comparison of European and African(ized) honeybees. a Comparison of the aggressive score as a function of the alarm pheromone concentration for Africanized (AHB, black triangles) and European (EHB, blue circles) honeybees. Experimental data modified from [4] (see the “Comparison between Africanized and European bees” section). Stars indicate significant differences in responsiveness according to the original paper (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01). b Comparison of the learned probabilities of stinging between European and African populations, from modelling. Shaded areas indicate the range of predators that European (blue, sth(15,25)) and African (grey, sth(15,70)) colonies faced during the learning process. Average ± one standard deviation from 50 independently trained populations, at the end of a learning process with 105 trials. For clarity, percepts for which the probability of stinging remains at the initialisation values (ps=0.5) are not shown. Visual percept vESC: ps=0.09±0.01 for EHB and ps=0.05±0.01 for AHB. Parameters: \(N=200, \gamma =0.003, k=1, t_{{att}}=0, \Delta t_{v}=10, r_{f}^{E}=0.6, r_{f}^{A}=0.3\). c Performance of each colony when faced with predators of sizes sth=20,55, from modelling. European colonies go extinct when they encounter a predator that is more resistant than the ones they faced during the learning process, whereas African colonies are able to survive

Back to article page