Skip to main content

Table 2 Proposed classification scheme of the Cephalopoda

From: Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference

Class Cephalopoda Cuvier, 1797

  Order Plectronocerida Flower, 1964

  Order Yanhecerida Chen et al., 1979

  Order Ellesmerocerida (*) Flower in Flower & Kummel, 1950

Subclass Orthoceratoidea Teichert, 1967

  Order Riocerida (*) King & Evans, 2019

  Order Dissidocerida (*) Zhuravleva, 1964

   Family Bajkaloceratidae Balashov, 1962

   Family Intejoceratidae Balashov, 1960

   Family Geisonoceratidae Zhuravleva, 1959

  Order Lituitida Starobogatov, 1983

  Order Orthocerida Kuhn, 1940

  Order Pseudorthocerida Flower & Caster, 1935

  Order Actinocerida Teichert, 1933

   Family Greenlandoceratidae Shimizu & Obata, 1935

   Family Ruedemannoceratidae Flower, 1940

   Family Gouldoceratidae Stait, 1984

Subclass Endoceratoidea Teichert, 1933

  Order Endocerida Teichert, 1933

  Order Bisonocerida Evans & King, 2012

   Family Padunoceratidae Balashov, 1960

Subclass Multiceratoidea Mutvei, 2013

   Family Bassleroceratidae (*) Ulrich, Foerste, Miller & Unklesbay, 1944

   Family Cyclostomiceratidae Foerste, 1925

   Family Apocrinoceratidae Flower in Flower & Teichert, 1957

   Family Clinoceratidae Flower, 1946

   Family Uranoceratidae Hyatt in Zittel, 1900

   Family Apsidoceratidae Hyatt, 1884

  Order Cyrtocerinida Flower, 1964

  Order Tarphycerida Flower in Flower & Kummel, 1950

  Order Oncocerida (*) Flower in Flower & Kummel, 1950

  Order Discosorida Flower in Flower & Kummel, 1950

  Order Ascocerida Kuhn, 1949

[Subclass Nautiloidea Agassiz, 1847]

[Subclass Ammonoidea Zittel, 1884]

[Subclass Coleoidea Bather, 1888]

  1. Under this scheme, several orders have no corresponding subclass, and several families are without order. These relationships will have to be solidified in the future and potentially assigned to other groups or new names will need to be established. Note that only families that differ in their systematic assignment from previous publications are listed here. The detailed content of the orders may differ from previously published studies, please consult the text and Additional file 1: Fig. S6-S17 for details. Groups marked with (*) are likely paraphyletic but are here retained for convenience. Subclasses in square brackets were not included in the analyses but are here listed for completeness. Class and subclass level are highlighted in bold