Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Biology

Fig. 1

From: Phylogenomic approaches untangle early divergences and complex diversifications of the olive plant family

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic hypotheses of Oleaceae from previous studies. a–f The six alternate topologies of the five tribes. g–j The four alternate topologies of the four subtribes of Oleeae. a Dupin et al. [36] using the 80 concatenated plastid coding genes based on the maximum likelihood (ML) method. b Dupin et al. [36] using the 37 concatenated mitochondrial genes based on the ML method. c Dupin et al. [36] using the RY-coded nrDNA based on the ML method. d Ha et al. [40] using six cpDNA sequence datasets (matK, rbcL, ndhF, atpB, rps16, and trnL-F) based on the Bayesian inference (BI) method and Dupin et al. [36] using the nuclear genes of phyB-1 and phyE-1. e Dupin et al. [36] using the nontransformed nrDNA cluster based on the ML method. f Wallander and Albert [26] using two plastid genes, rps16 and trnL-F, based on maximum parsimony (MP) methods. g Dupin et al. [36] using the 80 concatenated plastid coding genes, 37 concatenated mitochondrial genes, and RY-coded nrDNA based on the ML method. h Dupin et al. [36] using the nuclear genes of phyB-1 and phyE-1. i Van de Paer et al. [41] using the nuclear mtpt4 based on the ML method. j Dupin et al. [36] using the nontransformed nrDNA cluster based on the ML method. Myx, Myxopyreae; Fon, Fontanesieae; For, Forsythieae; Jas, Jasmineae; Ole, Oleeae; Lig, Ligustrinae; Sch, Schreberinae; Fra, Fraxininae; Olei, Oleinae

Back to article page