Skip to main content
Fig. 3. | BMC Biology

Fig. 3.

From: Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology

Fig. 3.

The decision tree used to obtain the estimate of the ‘unbiased’ effect (i.e. conditional β0). First, use a two-step procedure to estimate β0, β1 and β2 from the full model (Equations 2 or 3). Then, depending on whether the signs of slopes (β1 and β2) are opposite from what will be expected from publication bias (caused by a high amount of unaccounted heterogeneity), there are two types of estimates of β0. The first type includes all β0 regardless of their signs (β1 and β2); the second type of estimated β0 has four scenarios. Scenario 1 = only select β0 with expected signs of β1 and β2 from the full model; Scenario 2 = employ reduced model 1 (Equation 4) to re-estimate β0 where β1 has an unexpected sign, while β2 has an expected sign; Scenario 3 = employ reduced model 3 (Equation 5) to re-estimate β0 if β1 has an expected sign, while β2 has an unexpected sign; Scenario 4 = use β0 from the null model (Equation 1) when both β1 and β2 have unexpected signs (i.e. without the small-study effects or decline effects). The symbols (β0, β1, and β2) are as in Fig. 2

Back to article page