Skip to main content
Fig. 5. | BMC Biology

Fig. 5.

From: Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology

Fig. 5.

Orchard plots showing the distribution of the indicator of small-study effect (model slope β1[small − study]) for each meta-analysis and meta-analytic aggregation of β1[small − study] (pooled β1[small − study]). (A) Pooled β1[small − study] across different meta-analyses and different types of effect size, indicating the pattern of small-study effects. (B) Pooled β1[small − study] for each type of effect size. Solid circles = β1[small − study] estimates obtained from each meta-analysis; the size of each solid circle is proportional to its inverse standard error (i.e. precision). Open circles = pooled β1[small − study]. Thick error bars = 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thin error bars = prediction intervals (PIs). See more details in the legend of Fig. 2. All panels were made using orchard_plot() function in orchaRd R package (version 2.0) [62]

Back to article page