Exposure to ethanol leads to midfacial hypoplasia in a zebrafish model of FASD via indirect interactions with the Shh pathway

Background Gene-environment interactions are likely to underlie most human birth defects. The most common known environmental contributor to birth defects is prenatal alcohol exposure. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) describe the full range of defects that result from prenatal alcohol exposure. Gene-ethanol interactions underlie susceptibility to FASD, but we lack a mechanistic understanding of these interactions. Here, we leverage the genetic tractability of zebrafish to address this problem. Results We first show that vangl2, a member of the Wnt/planar cell polarity (Wnt/PCP) pathway that mediates convergent extension movements, strongly interacts with ethanol during late blastula and early gastrula stages. Embryos mutant or heterozygous for vangl2 are sensitized to ethanol-induced midfacial hypoplasia. We performed single-embryo RNA-seq during early embryonic stages to assess individual variation in the transcriptional response to ethanol and determine the mechanism of the vangl2-ethanol interaction. To identify the pathway(s) that are disrupted by ethanol, we used these global changes in gene expression to identify small molecules that mimic the effects of ethanol via the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS L1000) dataset. Surprisingly, this dataset predicted that the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) pathway inhibitor, cyclopamine, would mimic the effects of ethanol, despite ethanol not altering the expression levels of direct targets of Shh signaling. Indeed, we found that ethanol and cyclopamine strongly, but indirectly, interact to disrupt midfacial development. Ethanol also interacts with another Wnt/PCP pathway member, gpc4, and a chemical inhibitor of the Wnt/PCP pathway, blebbistatin, phenocopies the effect of ethanol. By characterizing membrane protrusions, we demonstrate that ethanol synergistically interacts with the loss of vangl2 to disrupt cell polarity required for convergent extension movements. Conclusions Our results show that the midfacial defects in ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants are likely due to an indirect interaction between ethanol and the Shh pathway. Vangl2 functions as part of a signaling pathway that regulates coordinated cell movements during midfacial development. Ethanol exposure alters the position of a critical source of Shh signaling that separates the developing eye field into bilateral eyes, allowing the expansion of the midface. Collectively, our results shed light on the mechanism by which the most common teratogen can disrupt development. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01062-9.


Conclusions:
Our results show that the midfacial defects in ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants are likely due to an indirect interaction between ethanol and the Shh pathway. Vangl2 functions as part of a signaling pathway that regulates coordinated cell movements during midfacial development. Ethanol exposure alters the position of a critical source of Shh signaling that separates the developing eye field into bilateral eyes, allowing the expansion of the midface. Collectively, our results shed light on the mechanism by which the most common teratogen can disrupt development.
Keywords: Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway, Convergent extension, Vangl2, Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), Ethanol, Cyclopia, Polarity, Gastrulation Background Birth defects manifest as structural or functional malformations at birth and are the leading cause of infant mortality in the USA [1]. Although the multifactorial etiologies of birth defects are not well understood, many are thought to derive from a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. The adverse effects of teratogens, or environmental agents that cause irreversible developmental defects, were first recognized in the 1950s and 1960s [2]. It was then that investigators began to observe developmental anomalies in infants exposed to methylmercury and thalidomide in utero [3,4]. Since then, other environmental teratogens have come to light, including but not limited to, pollutants, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals.
Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) is the most common preventable cause of birth defects, yet the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) in the USA is as high as 2-5% [5]. Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is the most severe outcome following PAE and is characterized by midfacial hypoplasia, as well as growth and neural deficits [6]. While PAE is required for the development of FASD, the teratogenic effects of ethanol are modulated by genetics [7,8]. For instance, monozygotic twins were 100% concordant for FAS, whereas dizygotic twins were only 63% concordant [8,9]. Furthermore, animal models of FAS show strain-specific differences after controlling for environmental variables such as dose and timing [10,11]. Despite this, the genetic factors that protect or predispose an individual to FASD are poorly understood. Moreover, we still lack a basic understanding of the mechanism of ethanol teratogenesis. Zebrafish are well suited to address this problem due to their genetic tractability and ease of embryological manipulation [12].
In a screen to identify genetic modifiers of ethanol teratogenicity, vang-like 2 (vangl2), a member of the non-canonical Wnt/planar cell polarity (Wnt/PCP) pathway, emerged as an ethanol sensitive locus [13]. In zebrafish, mutations in the vangl2 locus disrupt convergent extension movements during gastrulation, resulting in a shortened, broadened body axis [14]. These mutants can present with cyclopia, a fusion of the bilateral eyes, but the phenotypic expressivity of this trait varies with factors such as temperature and genetic background [15]. In the screen, all untreated vangl2 mutants displayed proper separation of the eyes and craniofacial skeletal elements were intact [13]. Upon exposure to 1% ethanol, a dose that does not normally cause facial defects, vangl2 mutants were fully penetrant for cyclopia and displayed profound defects to the midfacial skeleton [13]. Ethanoltreated vangl2 heterozygotes were largely indistinguishable from their wild-type siblings, with the exception of a single synophthalmic ethanol-treated heterozygote, providing evidence for latent haploinsufficiency. Together, these data suggest a synergistic interaction between a mutation in vangl2 and ethanol.
We know vangl2 plays a critical role in mediating convergent extension movements as evidenced by their body axis defect; however, because the early effects of ethanol exposure remain poorly defined, the precise mechanism of the vangl2-ethanol interaction remain elusive. To better understand how ethanol interacts with loss of vangl2 to alter phenotypic outcomes, we took an unbiased approach to assess the transcriptional response to ethanol. We performed single embryo RNA sequencing (RNAseq) on control (untreated) and ethanol-treated wildtype embryos in a time-course spanning gastrulation and early segmentation stages in zebrafish.
Bioinformatic and functional analyses indicated that midfacial defects in ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants were likely due to an indirect interaction between ethanol and the Shh pathway. While there was no alteration in the level of expression of direct Shh targets, a critical source of Shh signaling that separates the developing eye field into bilateral eyes becomes mispositioned in ethanol-exposed embryos. We demonstrate that ethanol and loss of vangl2, synergistically interact to disrupt polarized cellular protrusions required for proper convergent extension movements.

Results
Early embryogenesis is the sensitive time window for vangl2 mutants To determine the critical time window of ethanol sensitivity for vangl2 mutants and heterozygotes, we first initiated ethanol treatment at various stages comprising late blastula to early gastrula for 24 h. The inner lens-tolens width was used as a measure of synophthalmia, and we calculated the occurrence of cyclopia to characterize ethanol-induced teratogenesis. In control conditions, the spacing of the eyes in vangl2 mutants resembled that of wild-type zebrafish. However, we note that the facial phenotypes in vangl2 mutants are variable and midline defects can occur even under control conditions [15]. Ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants exhibited midline defects ranging in severity from synophthalmia to cyclopia across all time points examined, but these mutants were fully penetrant for cyclopia (100% fused; n=5/5) when ethanol was applied at shield stage (6 h post-fertilization, hpf) at the onset of gastrulation ( Fig. 1a-b). Interestingly, heterozygotes only displayed cyclopia when ethanol was applied at a high stage (3.3 hpf) (22% fused; n=4/18), a time when treating wild-type embryos with higher concentrations of ethanol causes similar defects (Fig. 1b) [16,17]. Thus, heterozygotes and homozygotes are divergent in their time window of greatest ethanol sensitivity. This may be due to a compensatory genetic mechanism in vangl2 heterozygotes, as zygotic gene expression initiates after high stage (4 hpf) in zebrafish.
The effect of ethanol on the early zebrafish transcriptome is subtle relative to the developmental age To determine if ethanol caused transcriptional changes that could underlie the interaction with vangl2, we designed two RNA-seq experiments that largely overlapped in design ( Fig. 2a-b). One possibility for the variability in the phenotypic outcome of ethanol exposure is variable transcriptional response across individuals. Therefore, we performed RNA-seq on single wild-type AB strain embryos to determine if ethanol exposure variably destabilized the transcriptome. Embryos were exposed to 1% ethanol in embryo media (171 mM), which equilibrates to approximately 50 mM tissue concentration [18]. For our RNA-seq experiments, ethanol exposure initiated at 6 hpf, when mutants were the most sensitive. Each sample consisted of an individual zebrafish embryo with five biological replicates per timepoint and treatment. For the first experiment, embryos were collected at midgastrulation (8 hpf) and the end of gastrulation (10 hpf) Fig. 1. Ethanol interacts with vangl2 during early embryogenesis. a Quantification of the distance between the lenses in embryos treated with 1% ethanol for 24 h, initiating at four different stages [3.3, 4, 4.5, and 6 h post fertilization (hpf)]. Statistical significance of differences between groups is indicated with compact letter display. Groups with different letters are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05; Tukey's honest test). Sample size and p values provided in Additional file 9: Table S2. b Percentage of embryos with complete cyclopia following each treatment. Heterozygous embryos were most sensitive to ethanol when exposed from 3.3 to 27.3 hpf. Mutants were most sensitive from 6 to 30 hpf (Fig. 2a). A second experiment was performed to increase power and to include a time when the eye fields have completely separated, 14 hpf (Fig. 2b). The 6 hpf control samples were omitted in the second experiment since they lacked ethanol-treated samples for comparison. The data from both experiments were combined for subsequent analyses, controlling for batch effects.
To assess the effect of age, batch (experiments 1 and 2), and ethanol, on the early zebrafish transcriptome, we Wild-type AB embryos were exposed to 1% ethanol at shield stage (6 hpf). Embryos were subsequently collected at 8 and 10 hpf for experiment 1  performed principal component analysis (PCA). Individuals of similar age clustered tightly along PC1, which accounted for 39% of the transcriptional variation observed across the datasets (Fig. 2c). This strong effect of age on the zebrafish transcriptome is in agreement with previous studies [19]. Clustering of samples by age, regardless of ethanol treatment suggested that control and ethanol-treated samples were accurately staged, indicating that ethanol did not delay developmentally regulated transcriptome patterns. There was greater discrimination of 14 hpf samples relative to earlier timepoints (6, 8, and 10 hpf), which is consistent with the greater distinction of this timepoint in terms of developmental time and morphology (Fig. 2c). PC2 largely captured batch effects between experiments 1 and 2 (Fig. 2d). The majority of variation between samples did not appear to be due to treatment, with control and ethanoltreated samples randomly interspersed along PC1 and PC2 (Fig. 2e). Separation by treatment was observed along PC8 and PC9, which accounts for 3% of the variation in the data (Fig. 2f). Hierarchical clustering of samples based on correlation further corroborated this finding. The 6 and 14 hpf samples showed the greatest dissimilarity, whereas the 8 and 10 hpf samples showed the greatest similarity, irrespective of treatment (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). In summary, the transcriptional effect of exposure to this dose of ethanol on the early zebrafish transcriptome was subtle, while age provided the strongest transcriptional fingerprint.
Ethanol has effects on transcription that are largely distinct between different developmental timepoints Although developmental age was a stronger source of transcriptional variation, we still detected substantial variation in gene expression following ethanol exposure. There were 1414 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with a false-discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.1 ( Fig. 3a; Benjamini-Hochberg procedure). There were more upregulated than downregulated DEGs among ethanoltreated individuals across timepoints (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A-D), and these DEGs were distinct between developmental timepoints (Fig. 3b). In summary, while some genes are generally affected by ethanol across several critical periods, ethanol largely elicits unique responses at distinct developmental stages spanning early embryogenesis.
Ethanol does not affect the Wnt/PCP pathway at the transcriptional level While vangl2 mutants do not typically exhibit cyclopia, cyclopia is observed in double mutants between vangl2 and other Wnt/PCP pathway members [15,20]. One potential mechanism for the interaction between ethanol and vangl2 would be the transcriptional misregulation of other Wnt/PCP pathway members. However, transcription of Wnt/PCP pathway members was largely unaffected by ethanol exposure. No Wnt/PCP pathway members were among the 14 shared DEGs across all timepoints (Fig. 3c). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further confirmed that ethanol had little effect on the Wnt/PCP pathway at the level of transcription (Fig. 3d). Only two Wnt/PCP pathway members were moderately affected: ethanol exposure moderately decreased expression of the cofactor, glypican 4 (gpc4), (log 2 fold= −0.237; p value = 0.036) across all timepoints [15,21] and increased expression of rac3a (log 2 fold = 0.737; p value = 8.89E−06), a member of the Rho family of small GTPases [22]. We plotted the normalized read counts across each time point from the RNA-seq experiment to further investigate the dynamics of the potential alteration in gpc4 levels. The expression of gpc4 was modestly reduced in ethanol-treated embryos across the RNA-seq dataset (Fig. 3e). Ethanol exposure consistently downregulated gpc4 at 8 and 10 hpf, but the magnitude of the downregulation was relatively modest. To statistically compare ethanol-treated and control embryos, expression of gpc4 at 10 hpf was investigated using realtime quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). This result demonstrated that gpc4 was not significantly affected by ethanol exposure (p = 0.4631) (Fig. 3f). Thus, direct transcriptional alteration to the Wnt/PCP pathway is unlikely to explain the ethanol-induced phenotypes in vangl2 mutants and heterozygotes.

Modules of co-regulated genes related to ethanol exposure
To determine if ethanol disrupted networks of genes could explain the vangl2-ethanol interaction, we next performed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) [23]. This unsupervised network analysis identifies groups of genes, termed "modules," based on correlated expression patterns across the samples. Modules are summarized by the first principal component for the expression estimates of the included genes, termed the "module eigengene," which can be correlated with sample traits to identify biological significance. The cluster dendrogram generated in this analysis illustrates the presence of highly distinct and clustered modules (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A). The merging of similar modules produced eleven total modules (Additional file 3: Fig. S3B). Consistent with our PCA analysis, the module eigengenes were primarily correlated with time. We used these modules to further validate our ethanol exposure regimen.
Previous work has shown that ethanol delays development in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations equal to or greater than 1.5% ethanol [24]. For the experiments herein, ethanol-treated samples were morphologically stage-matched to control samples to exclude differences due to developmental age or delay. To confirm that the ethanol samples were indeed agematched to the control samples at the level of transcription, we compared expression patterns of developmentally regulated genes between the ethanol and control samples from each timepoint. For developmentally regulated genes, we used the gene with the highest module membership, the "hub gene," from each of the WGCNA modules that was associated with time (p < 0.05) (Additional file 4: Fig. S4). Consistent with the results from the PCA, the slope of the expression levels for each gene were similar in control and ethanol-treated samples across age, most clearly demonstrated in the magenta4, thistle1, and blueviolet modules (Additional file 4: Fig.  S4B-C, and G). Interestingly, we find a time-specific difference in the expression of hub genes in the honey-dew1, greenyellow, and saddlebrown modules at 10 hpf (Additional file 4: Fig. S4F, H, and K). Together, these data indicate samples were accurately age-matched and the observed changes were biologically relevant.
Two modules (mediumpurple4 and darkolivegreen4) correlated with ethanol treatment (Additional file 3: . Effects on transcription are largely distinct between developmental time points. a Volcano plot showing differential expression due to ethanol treatment across all samples. Significant genes (FDR < 0.1) are indicated in red. Genes that were significant at all time points are indicated in blue. b Venn-diagram showing overlap of significant genes between the three individual timepoints. Total number of genes is indicated for each time point and overlapping time points. Percentage of significant genes out of the total number of genes is included in parentheses. c Genes that were significant at all timepoints. d KEGG pathway schematic illustrating differential expression due to ethanol treatment in the Wnt/PCP pathway. Color coding indicates log 2 fold differences due to ethanol treatment across all samples. Only pathway members with significant changes were color coded. e Normalized read counts indicating expression of gpc4 across different subsets of the dataset. f RT-qPCR of gpc4 in 10 hpf control and ethanol-treated wild-type embryos. n=7, for each group (p = 0.4631) were selected for independent validation on biological replicate samples derived from the same wild-type zebrafish line using RT-qPCR. These results indicate that our RNA-seq faithfully represents transcript levels. The green module is only weakly downregulated and is enriched for genes encoding zinc finger (ZnF) proteins, which included znf1015 (Additional file 3: Fig. S3G). This module is almost entirely composed of genes on chromosome 4 that have been shown to be co-regulated during these stages of development [25,26]. The purple module revealed GO enrichment of transmembrane transporters, which included slc16a9a (Additional file 3: Fig. S3H). As an upregulated module enriched in transporters, these genes are likely to represent the physiological response to ethanol. Thus, while we did identify two modules associated with ethanol (Additional file 5: Table S1), the module membership did not provide clues to the interaction between ethanol and vangl2.

Cyclopamine is predicted to mimic the effects of ethanol
One challenge in RNA-seq analyses is inferring the mechanism underlying a diseased or environmentally perturbed state from a large set of differentially expressed genes. Individual functional analyses of significant gene-ethanol interactions are time-consuming and thus inefficient. To circumvent this problem, we adopted a bioinformatics approach, utilizing the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS L1000) toolkit [27]. This transcriptomic dataset includes gene expression data from nine human cancer cell lines exposed to thousands of small molecule drugs [27]. We queried the top 100 and 150 upregulated and downregulated genes induced by ethanol exposure against the LINCS L1000 dataset using the clue.io platform (https:// clue.io). The query generated a list of small molecules predicted to have a positive or negative correlation to the input signature (i.e., small molecules predicted to either mimic or antagonize the transcriptional effects of ethanol). We were particularly interested in those chemicals with a positive correlation to ethanol as they would give insight into the mechanism of ethanol teratogenicity and highlight potential co-factors that exacerbate ethanol teratogenicity.
Interestingly, cyclopamine, a hallmark Shh pathway inhibitor that inhibits the core Shh pathway protein Smoothened (Smo), was predicted to positively correlate with the ethanol signature. The Shh pathway is critical for midfacial development and mice deficient in Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) exhibit severe brain and face malformations, including holoprosencephaly and a single-medial eye (cyclopia) [28]. In zebrafish, reduction of shh or null mutations in smo similarly results in severe loss of craniofacial midline structures of the anterior neurocranium [29]. Animal models have demonstrated ethanol is an environmental risk factor for holoprosencephaly, resulting in a characteristic set of midfacial defects, a hypomorphic forebrain, and in severe cases, cyclopia [16,17,[30][31][32][33]. Thus, attenuation of the Shh pathway could mechanistically explain the vangl2-ethanol interaction.

Ethanol indirectly attenuates Shh signaling
To investigate the interaction of cyclopamine and ethanol, we first exposed wild-type zebrafish embryos to cyclopamine (50 μM) at shield stage (6 hpf) for 24 h, mimicking the ethanol exposure window for the vangl2 mutants. Embryos were fixed at 4 dpf and the cartilage and bone were stained with Alcian blue and Alizarin red, respectively. We observed a range of midfacial defects with the most severe phenotype being a complete loss of the anterior neurocranium and reduced spacing between the eyes (Fig. 4a). Since cyclopamine was predicted to mimic the effects of ethanol, we next combined this low dose of cyclopamine with ethanol. Strikingly, all embryos presented with synophthalmia or cyclopia and significant reductions and defects of the cartilages of the neuro-and viscerocranium. To quantify this combinatorial effect, we measured the inner lens-to-lens width and observed a significant reduction in co-exposed embryos relative to those exposed to either ethanol or cyclopamine alone (p < 0.0001), suggesting a strong synergistic interaction (Fig. 4b).
In chick, ethanol exposure during somitogenesis has been proposed to suppress Shh signaling and induce apoptosis in cranial neural crest cells that make up the craniofacial skeleton [34]. However, work in zebrafish shows only a modest increase in cell death within the eye field at a much higher dose of 2% ethanol [35]. To ensure that cells in the eye field are not simply undergoing apoptosis, we performed a TUNEL cell death assay in ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants at 11 hpf, prior to optic vesicle evagination. As expected, we failed to detect an increase in apoptotic cells within the eye field in ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants or their siblings (Additional file 6: Fig. S5). Thus, Shh-mediated pro-survival signals do not appear to be significantly disrupted by ethanol.
To test for a direct effect of ethanol on Shh signaling, we quantified the relative expression of patched 2 (ptch2), a canonical read-out of Shh pathway activity, at bud stage (10 hpf). Ethanol exposure had no effect on the expression levels of ptch2 (p = 0.9966), consistent with RNA-seq results (Fig. 4c). While cyclopamine significantly reduced Shh signaling (p = 0.0006), ethanol did not further reduce ptch2 levels significantly (p = 0.1115). KEGG analysis from the RNA-seq confirmed that ethanol does not affect the Shh pathway as a whole, nor does it reduce the levels of direct targets of Shh signaling (i.e., gli, ptch) (Fig. 4d). Thus, at this dose, ethanol does not appear to directly attenuate Shh signaling.

Ethanol disrupts convergent extension
The ethanol-induced vangl2 mutant phenotype closely mirrors those in compound mutants between vangl2 and other Wnt/PCP pathway members [15,20]. These double mutants display a further reduction in convergent extension, as evidenced by a shorter and broader body axis [15]. Based on these data, we hypothesized that ethanol disrupts convergent extension, which would mislocalize the Shh signal and result in eye defects.
We performed in situ hybridization on control and ethanol-treated vangl2 embryos to examine convergent extension and to test the hypothesis that the Shh expression domain is mislocalized in ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants. We analyzed the expression of shha in the axial mesoderm and paired box 2a (pax2a) in the midbrainhindbrain boundary at bud stage (10 hpf) (Fig. 5a) [36]. Ethanol was initiated at a high stage (3.3 hpf). We chose this timepoint because it is when heterozygotes are most sensitive to ethanol-induced synophthalmia. Because vangl2 mutants have convergent extension defects and display synophthalmia, we reasoned that effects may be more apparent in heterozygotes. We observed a gene and ethanol-dose-dependent reduction in the length of the shha expression domain (extension) and an increase in the width of the pax2a expression domain (convergence).
To quantify the effect of ethanol on convergent extension, we plotted the normalized expression values of shha/pax2a (Fig. 5b). Post hoc analyses (Tukey's) revealed significant differences between control embryos across vangl2 genotypes, indicating that vangl2 gene dosage affects convergent extension. Similarly, we found significant differences between ethanoltreated mutants and their heterozygous (p = 0.0037) and wild-type siblings (p = 0.0052). This observation confirms that loss of vangl2 results in reduced convergent extension movements, as evidenced by their short body axis. This phenotype was exacerbated with ethanol treatment, resulting in reduced convergent extension for vangl2 heterozygotes and homozygotes, compared to their untreated counterparts. While there was a trend, we did not observe a difference in convergent extension between ethanol-treated vangl2 heterozygotes and their wild-type siblings in their shha/pax2a ratio (p = 0.9554). However, synophthalmia occurred in ethanol-treated heterozygotes but not  Table S2. c RT-qPCR of ptch2 in 10 hpf control and ethanol-and/or cyclopaminetreated wild-type embryos. n = 4, for all groups (p < 0.05; Tukey's honest test). P values provided in Additional file 9: Table S2. d KEGG pathway schematic illustrating differential expression due to ethanol treatment in the sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway. Color coding indicates log 2 fold differences due to ethanol treatment across all samples wild-type embryos, demonstrating that the nonsignificant reduction in convergent extension in the heterozygotes can have a phenotypic consequence. Separation of the eye field into two eye primordia is accomplished via Shh signaling to the anterior neural plate. We measured the distance between shha and dlx3, a marker of the anterior neural plate (Fig. 5a and c), to determine if ethanol alters the source and target of Shh. Here again, we find a combinatorial effect of ethanol and vangl2 gene dosage, with ethanol-exposed mutants having the greatest distance between the shha and dlx3 expression domains (Fig. 5c). Ethanol exposure has a significant effect on this distance in wild-type embryos (p = 0.003). The distance is slightly, albeit non-significantly, elevated in ethanol-treated mutants, compared to unexposed mutants (p = 0.7133). Given that vangl2 mutants are predisposed to cyclopia, this slight increase may again, have phenotypic relevance. These results are consistent with a model in which the interaction between ethanol and vangl2 is due to an indirect effect of ethanol on the Shh pathway via combined disruption of convergent extension cell movements.
Ethanol alters six3 and rx3 expression in the eye field Transcription factors involved in the specification of the eye field have also been implicated in the mechanism of eye field separation. The expression of three of these transcription factors, six3, rx3, and rx1 is altered by ethanol exposure [35]. We examined the effect of ethanol on six3a and rx3 in ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants at the initiation of optic vesicle evagination. In situ hybridization of six3a in 11 hpf embryos shows a heartshaped expression pattern in the prospective forebrain. The caudal indentation marks the splitting of the eye field into bilateral domains (Fig. 5d). This expression pattern becomes more diffuse with loss of vangl2. In untreated homozygous mutants, we observed a shortening along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis and a broadening along the mediolateral axis at 11 hpf, consistent with the convergent extension defect. This expression pattern was further exacerbated in ethanol-treated mutants with complete loss of the caudal indentation. We observed a similar effect of genotype and ethanol on rx3 expression at mid-evagination (12 hpf) (Additional file 7: Fig. S6). At this stage, rx3 is localized to the prospective forebrain and retina [37]. Ethanol-treated vangl2 homozygous mutants exhibit a compressed expression domain, clearly  Table S2. c Quantification of the distance between shha and dlx3, as shown by the dotted line in panel A (p < 0.05; Tukey's honest test). Sample size and p values provided in Additional file 9: Table S2. d Expression pattern of six3a via whole mount in situ hybridization, in control and ethanol-treated vangl2 embryos at 11 hpf displaying a reduction in convergent extension. Our expression analyses suggest the eye field is specified but mislocalized and fails to separate into bilateral domains, likely due to defects in mesodermal migration. However, we cannot rule out a specific transcriptional effect of ethanol on a small cell population that receives Shh signaling, and scRNA-seq would prove useful to identify such interactions.

Mutation in gpc4 enhances cyclopia in a dose-dependent manner
Our data support a model in which ethanol interacts with vangl2 via a combinatorial disruption of convergent extension. If ethanol disrupts convergent extension, which leads to interactions with vangl2, then further genetic disruption to convergent extension should exacerbate the ethanol-vangl2 phenotype. Embryos deficient in gpc4 similarly have a defect in convergent extension as evidenced by their shortened, broadened body axis [15]. Previous work in zebrafish has shown a functional interaction between vangl2 and gpc4, where vangl2;gpc4 double mutants were invariably cyclopic [15]. We conducted additional functional analyses to further examine the relationship between these two genes in the context of ethanol exposure. Consistent with Marlow et al., double mutants were fully penetrant for cyclopia with or without ethanol. While 1% ethanol exposure altered the facial morphology of gpc4 mutants, it did not cause cyclopia (Additional file 8: Fig. S7A). However, ethanol concentrations greater than 1%, which did not cause cyclopia in wild-type siblings, resulted in cyclopia in gpc4 mutants (Additional file 8: Fig. S7B) [15]. Additionally, embryos carrying 3 mutant alleles (either vangl2 m209/m209 ;gpc4 fr6/+ or vangl2 m209/+ ;gpc4 fr6/fr6 ) were greatly sensitized to cyclopia when exposed to 1% ethanol (Additional file 8: Fig. S7C). Collectively, these data indicate that ethanol disrupts convergent extension, and in sensitized genotypes, mispositions a source of Shh that is essential for the separation of the eye field into bilateral primordia.

Blebbistatin phenocopies the ethanol-induced defect in vangl2 mutants
If ethanol is having an effect on convergent extension, a known inhibitor of convergent extension should similarly interact with vangl2. We extended our analyses to test the effect of blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor that disrupts cell movements and reduces axis elongation, in vangl2 mutants [38]. Blebbistatin treatment during gastrulation (6-10 hpf) induced synophthalmia in vangl2 heterozygotes and homozygotes (Fig. 6a). We then quantified this interaction by measuring the inner lens-tolens width and found a significant reduction in blebbistatin-treated vangl2 homozygotes (Fig. 6b).  Furthermore, 26.92% and 100% of blebbistatin-treated heterozygotes and homozygotes, respectively, were cyclopic (Fig. 6c). These data suggest ethanol further inhibits convergent extension in the sensitized background, vangl2, which not only disrupts their ability to elongate their body axis, but also inhibits the splitting of the eye field.
Ethanol affects vangl2 filopodia organization on migrating cells Based on our data, cell dynamics underlying convergent extension are likely involved in the vangl2-ethanol interaction. During gastrulation, mesodermal cells adopt a bipolar shape and orient their actin-based cytoskeletal projections on their leading and trailing edge, with respect to the notochord, allowing for proper convergent extension [39]. In vangl2 mutant embryos, these gastrula cells fail to elongate and align with the primary axis [40]. Furthermore, vangl2 mutant ectodermal cells possess a greater number of filopodial protrusions than their wildtype siblings and display projections in an unpolarized manner [41].
To determine whether ethanol may be exacerbating this phenotype, we analyzed filopodia protrusion length and orientation around the circumference of migrating live mesodermal cells. We injected memGFP mRNA into a single blastomere of vangl2 embryos at the 8-32 cell stage, to obtain mosaic expression. We then treated a subset of the injected embryos with 1% ethanol from 6 to 10 hpf. Homozygous mutants were identified based  Table S2 on their reduced body axis elongation at 10 hpf. Cells were imaged at 40-60°from the primary axis. Spike-like filopodia were highly unpolarized in ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants compared to their wild-type and heterozygous siblings (Fig. 7a). We quantified the polarity and number of filopodia for each cell, with respect to the head (90 o ), the primary axis/notochord (180 o ), and the tail (270°) (Fig. 7b). Rose diagrams suggest ethanoltreated vangl2 mutants have more un-polarized projections on the anterior/posterior edge (red) as opposed to the leading (green) or trailing (blue) edge. We next reduced the number of bins in the rose diagrams to 90°a nd noticed a clear over-representation of filopodia in vangl2 mutants on their anterior/posterior edge (Fig. 7c). Tukey's post hoc analyses confirmed ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants had significantly more filopodia on their anterior/posterior edge compared to other axes and their wild-type or heterozygous siblings (Fig. 7d). These data confirm that ethanol exposure is associated with an increase in the number of filopodial projections oriented in the wrong direction, or perpendicular to the path of dorsal migration, in ethanol-treated vangl2 mutants.

Molecular staging for the early zebrafish embryo
Despite their importance, the nature and mechanisms of gene-environment interactions are largely unknown. Here, we performed single embryo bioinformatic analyses to shed light upon the mechanism behind geneenvironment interactions. A growing number of researchers are using the zebrafish for toxicological and gene-environment studies. One potential confounding variable in these types of studies is developmental delay. Our WGCNA analyses are rich in gene modules that similarly vary over developmental time, providing a way to molecularly stage embryos. Thus, our results will provide important resources to ensure the rigor and reproducibility of these analyses.

The effect of ethanol on the transcriptome is subtle
Our hierarchical clustering analysis demonstrates that the effect of ethanol on the transcriptome is minor. Within any given time point, ethanol-exposed and unexposed embryos intermingled. PCA results support this, demonstrating that only 3% of the variance in the transcriptomic data is attributable to ethanol exposure. In sum, we found 1414 differentially regulated genes across all time points with the majority of these genes being upregulated. Most differentially expressed genes were specific to a single time point. At any given time point, there were between 92 and 328 differentially expressed genes. Thus, exposure to a dose of ethanol that does not disrupt facial development results in subtle and dynamic alterations to the transcriptome.
Our findings identified dramatically fewer differentially expressed genes than those observed in transcriptomic analyses of ethanol-exposed chicken and mouse embryos. In chicken 3422 differentially regulated genes were observed after 6 h of ethanol treatment and the preponderance (1924 genes) were downregulated [42]. In a mouse microarray, 2906 differentially expressed genes were identified 3 h after ethanol injection [43]. Species-specific developmental trajectories or the tissue analyzed, cranial neural fold (chicken), headfold (mouse), versus whole embryo (our study) may account for some of these differences. However, it is important to note that the chicken and mouse strains analyzed are highly sensitive to the dose of ethanol used while our zebrafish AB strain is not (without the addition of a sensitizing mutation). Thus, the chicken and mouse data likely represent transcriptomic changes representative of pathogenesis. Our zebrafish data reflect a direct effect of ethanol, which may or may not be pathogenic depending upon the genetic and environmental milieu.
WGCNA analysis identified two modules (medium-purple4 and darkolivegreen4) of genes that are coordinately altered by ethanol exposure. The vast majority of genes that negatively correlate with ethanol exposure (membership in darkolivegreen4) encode zinc finger proteins (ZnF) located on chromosome 4. Ethanol has similarly been shown to downregulate Zinc finger protein, subfamily 1A, 4 in mouse fetuses exposed to ethanol during early development [44]. However, the functional significance of these changes in ZnF proteins remains unknown and they often have diverse binding affinities and functions. The long arm of zebrafish chromosome 4 (Chr4q) is typically heterochromatic (condensed) and lacking in protein-coding genes [45]. However, it is not late replicating until the end of gastrulation or bud stage (10 hpf) [26]. Previous work in zebrafish has found ZnF proteins on chromosome 4 to undergo robust expression from the initiation of zygotic transcription until midgastrula stage [25]. Since many chromosome 4 genes are downregulated across ethanol-treated individuals during gastrulation, ethanol may interfere with replication timing, blocking the early-to-late replication switch, or chromatin remodeling. Based on these findings, the differentially expressed genes may follow the disrupted expression of ZnF proteins due to chromatin remodeling.

Ethanol interacts with vangl2 through the indirect effects on the Shh pathway
Because Vangl2 is a core member of the Wnt/PCP pathway, a simple explanation for ethanol-sensitivity in vangl2 mutants would be that ethanol transcriptionally dysregulates the Wnt/PCP pathway. However, our RNAseq results indicated that this is not the case. The expression of gpc4 was the only member of the Wnt/PCP pathway that was downregulated in our RNA-seq dataset. Cyclopia is observed in vangl2;gpc4 double mutants [15], and we show that heterozygosity for gpc4 further sensitized vangl2 mutants to ethanol. However, the downregulation of gpc4 was quite modest and unlikely to have any substantial impact on the phenotype of ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutant.
We used an unbiased approach, the LINCS L1000 dataset to identify pathways that might be disrupted by ethanol and generate cyclopia in vangl2 mutants. One of the top matches to the effects of ethanol was cyclopamine, a Hh pathway inhibitor. Shh signaling is critically important for the development of the midface across species [28,[46][47][48]. In zebrafish, shha and smo mutants have cyclopia because Shh signaling to the diencephalon is critical for the separation of the eye fields [49,50]. Furthermore, cyclopia observed in Wnt/PCP pathway mutants is due to the mispositioning of this source of Shh [16,20]. Thus, disruption of the Shh pathway could mechanistically explain the ethanol sensitivity of vangl2 mutants.
The Shh pathway has been implicated in ethanol teratogenesis. However, there has been much controversy regarding whether this interaction is direct or not [8]. As predicted by LINCS, we find a synergistic interaction between ethanol and the Hh pathway inhibitor cyclopamine. However, both our RNA-seq and qPCR data demonstrate that, at this timing and dose, ethanol does not alter the expression of direct readouts of Shh activity. Such an alteration would be expected if ethanol interacted directly with core components of the pathway. As supported by our in situ analysis, we conclude that ethanol indirectly affects the Shh pathway by mislocalizing the source of the ligand. While there is no global disruption to Shh signaling, it remains possible that there are cell-type-specific effects to the pathway. Such effects could be difficult to identify in our whole embryo approach. Single-cell RNA-seq would be useful in identifying cell type-specific effects of ethanol on transcription.

Ethanol disrupts convergent extension by disrupting polarized cellular protrusions
The phenotypes observed in ethanol-exposed vangl2 mutants suggest that ethanol further disrupts convergent extension. Future analyses directly comparing the effects of ethanol and other disruptors of convergent extensions, such as blebbistatin, on filopodial dynamics will aid our understanding of the mechanism of ethanol. Our findings are consistent with previous observations that high doses of ethanol can generate phenotypes consistent with a disruption of convergent extension in zebrafish and Xenopus [16,17,51,52]. More recently, zebrafish microarray analyses demonstrated that disrupted gastrulation movements due to ethanol exposure were caused by a reduction in pchd18a expression [53]. The expression of pchd18a is not altered in our dataset. However, Sarmah and colleagues used the ethanolsensitive TL strain and exposed embryos to ethanol from 2 to 8 hpf. This later difference is particularly intriguing given our finding that the time window of greatest sensitivity to ethanol was different for vangl2 heterozygotes and mutants, with heterozygotes being most sensitive at 3.3 hpf (the earliest time we tested). This raises the interesting possibility that the earlier time window of teratogenesis is due to a different mechanism.

Conclusions
We propose that ethanol leads to midfacial defects and cyclopia, not by dysregulating Wnt/PCP at the level of transcription, but indirectly through inhibition of convergent extension and mislocalization of important developmental regulators like shha. At the start of convergent extension, lateral gastrula cells migrate and converge to the dorsal region of the developing embryo, where they intercalate between neighboring cells to drive extension of the body axis [21,54,55]. As these cells begin their dorsal migration, they elongate along their mediolateral axis and polarize their actin-based cytoskeletal processes medially and laterally to drive intercalation [55,56]. Convergent extension movements during gastrulation also alter the shape of the eye field, whereby diencephalic precursor cells articulate both medially and caudally [57]. We know from previous work that vangl2 mutant lateral gastrula cells fail to elongate their mediolateral axis and have a slight anterior bias in their dorsal trajectory [40,58]. In addition to their shape changes, vangl2 mutant ectodermal cells have more filopodia than wildtype cells and defective polarization (i.e., less filopodia localized on the trailing edge), resulting in a compromised dorsal trajectory [41]. Using live confocal imaging coupled with memGFP expression, we examined the effect of ethanol on filopodia number and polarity in vangl2 embryos. Interestingly, we did not find more filopodia in vangl2 lateral mesodermal cells relative to wildtype cells. Despite this, we find that ethanoltreated vangl2 mutant embryos have more filopodia on their anterior/posterior edge relative to their mediolateral edge. In support of our hypothesis, we demonstrate that ethanol disrupts protrusion polarity, convergent extension, and shha localization, with greater disruption observed in vangl2 mutants.

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) care and use
Zebrafish were cared for using standard IACUCapproved protocols at the University of Texas at Austin. The wild-type AB strain was used for RNA-seq analysis because it is commonly used in zebrafish research and has been extensively inbred to minimize genetic heterogeneity. The vangl2 m209 allele, originally described as tri m209 (ZIRC Cat# ZL435, RRID:ZIRC_ZL435) [40], was obtained from the Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC) as reported [13]. The gpc4 fr6 line was provided by Dr. Lila Solnica-Krezel. Adult fish were maintained on a 14-h/10-h light-dark cycle at 28.5°C. Embryos were collected and staged according to morphology and somite number [59].

Chemical treatments
Embryos were treated with 1% ethanol diluted in embryo media, a dose that does not disrupt normal facial development. This dose mimics an acute (binge-like) alcohol exposure roughly equivalent to a blood alcohol concentration of 0.19% in humans. AB embryos were treated with a 50-μM cyclopamine (Toronto Research Chemicals C988400), diluted in embryo media. The concentration of ethanol (vehicle) in the embryo media was controlled for between treatment groups and equals a final concentration of 0.5% in the EM. Blebbistatin (Sigma-Aldrich B0560) was dissolved in DMSO and diluted to a concentration of 37.5 μM in 3 mL of embryo media. Following chemical exposure, embryos were washed 3x in embryo media and then grown to 4 dpf before fixation. Samples sizes for all figures with treatment groups are provided in Additional file 9: Table S2.
mRNA injection memGFP cloned in the pCS2 vector was linearized by NotI restriction endonuclease. Synthetic mRNA was generated using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE TM SP6 Transcription Kit (Invitrogen, AM1340). Embryos were microinjected at 100pg between the 8 and 16 cell stages [41].

Sample collection and RNA extraction
Single embryos were manually dechorionated and collected in a 1.75-mL microcentrifuge tube with 500 mL of TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, 15596-026). Embryos were homogenized with a motorized pestle (VWR, 47747-370) and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction. The total RNA was processed according to the TRIzol RNA isolation protocol. Samples were re-suspended with 50 μL of nuclease-free water and subsequently purified using the RNA Clean & Concentrator kit (Zymo, R1018). The concentration of each sample was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The quality of total RNA was analyzed with the Agilent BioAnalyzer to ensure that the RNA Integrity Number (RIN) was ≥ 8. Samples were submitted to the Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility (GSAF) at the University of Texas at Austin. The GSAF performed standard RNA-seq library preparations with poly-A mRNA capture.

Tukey's honest test
Statistical significance of differences between groups is indicated with compact letter display. Groups with different letters are significantly different from one another (p < 0.05; Tukey's honest test). Groups that share any letter are not significantly different. For instance, a group labeled "a" is significantly different from one labeled "b." A group labeled "ab" is not significantly different from one labeled "a" or one labeled "b." See Additional file 9: Table S2 for all p values.

RNA-seq data processing
Sequencing on the NextSeq 500 platform produced an average of 40.8 million ± 1.4 million (SE) raw paired-end reads per sample. Adapter trimming was performed using Cutadapt with a minimum length of 25 bp [60]. Following adapter trimming, we retained an average of 40.0 ± 1.3 million (SE) reads per sample. Genome Reference Consortium Zebrafish Build 10 (GRCz10) for D. rerio was downloaded from Ensembl [61]. Trimmed reads were mapped to the reference using STAR [62]. The mean mapping efficiency was 78.2% ± 0.8% (SE). Following mapping, PCR duplicates were removed using Picard (https:// broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The duplication rate was estimated at 85% ± 0.8% (SE). Sorting and conversion between SAM and BAM files were performed using samtools [63]. Reads mapping to annotated genes were counted with HTseq version 0.6.1p1 using the intersection nonempty mode [64]. The final number of reads mapped to annotated genes was on average 3.9 ± 0.2 million reads per sample. Detailed instructions and example commands for implementing the data processing steps described above are available on Github (https://github.com/ grovesdixon/Drerio_early_ethanol_RNAseq).

Differential expression analysis
Normalization and statistical analysis of read counts were performed using DESeq2 [65]. Factors included in the differential expression models were ethanol treatment (control, treated), developmental timepoint (8 hpf, 10 hpf, and 14 hpf), and sequencing batch (experiment 1 or experiment 2). Because none of the 6 hpf samples were treated with ethanol, these samples were not included. We tested for differential expression associated with ethanol treatment using likelihood ratio testscomparing the model including all three factors to a reduced model that did not include ethanol treatment. To further examine stage-specific ethanol effects, we split the samples by developmental timepoint and tested for ethanol effects within each group.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)
To validate our RNA-seq data, we selected two genes to test using RT-qPCR. The total RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript™ First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) with oligo-d(T) primers. RT-qPCR was performed with Power Sybr Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 4367659) on the Applied Biosystems ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System. QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software was used for data analysis using the 2 -ΔΔCt method of relative gene expression analysis. The endogenous control lsm12b (like-Sm protein 12 homolog b) was used based on its stable expression profiles across treatment and stage groups in the RNA-seq dataset.

KEGG enrichment methods and results
We tested for enrichment of significant upregulated and downregulated genes among KEGG pathways separately using Fisher's exact tests. For each KEGG pathway, we tested a two-way contingency table with inclusion in the KEGG pathway as columns, and significant (FDR < 0.05) upregulation or downregulation as rows. P values were then adjusted for multiple tests using Benjamini-Hochberg method [66]. In the event that multiple genes from the dataset were annotated with the same pathway member, the log 2 fold difference for the gene with the greatest absolute value for the difference was used.
Three KEGG pathways were enriched for significant differential expression. Two for upregulated genes and one for downregulated genes. The upregulated KEGG pathways (dre00250 and dre00480) were (1) alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and (2) glutathione metabolism. The downregulated KEGG pathway (dre03013) was RNA transport. The pathview figures for these are in kegg_pathways/significant_pathway_figures/ in the git repository.

Cartilage and bone staining and measurements
Embryos were fixed at 4 days post fertilization (dpf) and stained with Alcian blue for cartilage and Alizarin red for mineralized bone [67]. Whole mounts of vangl2 m209 embryos were captured using a Zeiss Axio Imager A1 microscope. To assess the degree of cyclopia, the distance between the medial edges of the lenses was measured using the AxiovisionLE software.

In situ hybridization
Antisense digoxygenin-labeled riboprobes for shha, pax2, dlx3, six3a, and rx3 (together as a gift from Dr. Steve Wilson) were used. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described [68]. Images were captured using the Zeiss Axio Imager A1, and expression domains were measured using the AxiovisionLE software. An ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test were used for statistical analyses.

Confocal imaging
Control and ethanol-treated (6-10 hpf) embryos were dechorionated and staged at 10 hpf. Homozygous mutants were distinguished between wild-type and heterozygotes by their body axis elongation at the bud stage. Live embryos were mounted in methyl cellulose. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope using a ×10 and ×60 objective.

Quantification of filopodia
The number of filopodia was acquired through projections of Z-stacks using the ×60 objective on the Zen software. The angle of projections was calculated using Fiji. Rose diagrams of the mean number of filopodia found were plotted using geom_bar() and the coord_ polar() functions from ggplot2. The mean numbers of filopodia for different embryonic regions were compared between groups using ANOVA and Tukey's "honest significant difference" method. Significantly distinct means were assigned based on Tukey's honest significant difference results using the R package multcomp [69].
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Age is the major driver of variation in the dataset. Heatmap showing overall correlation of gene expression among samples. Samples were hierarchically clustered based on similarity. Treatment [control or ethanol treated (C or E)] and developmental age [hours post fertilization (6, 8, 10, 14, or)] are indicated in the row and column labels.
Additional file 2: Fig. S2. There are more upregulated than downregulated genes among ethanol-treated individuals. Volcano plot showing variation in the transcriptional response to ethanol treatment across developmental timepoints. Significant genes (FDR < 0.1) are indicated in red. For each subset, the names of the topmost significantly dysregulated genes are noted near gene's data point A All timepoints combined together B 8 hpf only C 10 hpf only D 14 hpf only.
Additional file 3: Fig. S3. WGCNA identifies two modules that are significantly correlated with ethanol exposure. A Dendrogram illustrating the hierarchical clustering of the genes and with their corresponding modules colors. The top layer of colors indicates the Dynamic Tree Cutoff, including all assigned modules, before merging by module similarity. The bottom layer indicates the module colors after merging. These merged modules were used for further analysis. B Heatmap of module-trait correlations. The eigengene for each module was correlated with ethanol treatment (ethanol), hours post fertilization (age), experimental batch (seqjob), and as a negative control, a randomly shuffled version of the ethanol treatments (rand.eth). Intensity of the color in each cell indicates the strength of correlation between the module (row labels) and the sample trait (column labels). Two modules, (mediumpurple4 and darkolivegreen4) significantly correlated with ethanol treatment (p < 0.05). C Scatterplots of correlation with ethanol treatment against module membership. Each datapoint is a gene assigned to the indicated module. Ethanol correlation is the Pearson correlation between the gene's expression level and ethanol treatment. Module membership is the correlation between the genes expression level and the module eigengene and describes how well the gene matches the overall patterns of the module. D Boxplot of log 2 fold differences due to ethanol for the two significant modules (darkolivegreen4 and mediumpurple4). E Changes in gene expression from the RNA-seq were validated using wild-type embryos at 10