Nutrient-responsive regulation determines biodiversity in a colicin-mediated bacterial community
© Hol et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 11 April 2014
Accepted: 1 August 2014
Published: 27 August 2014
Antagonistic interactions mediated by antibiotics are strong drivers of bacterial community dynamics which shape biodiversity. Colicin production by Escherichia coli is such an interaction that governs intraspecific competition and is involved in promoting biodiversity. It is unknown how environmental cues affect regulation of the colicin operon and thus influence antibiotic-mediated community dynamics.
Here, we investigate the community dynamics of colicin-producing, -sensitive, and -resistant/non-producer E. coli strains that colonize a microfabricated spatially-structured habitat. Nutrients are found to strongly influence community dynamics: when growing on amino acids and peptides, colicin-mediated competition is intense and the three strains do not coexist unless spatially separated at large scales (millimeters). Surprisingly, when growing on sugars, colicin-mediated competition is minimal and the three strains coexist at the micrometer scale. Carbon storage regulator A (CsrA) is found to play a key role in translating the type of nutrients into the observed community dynamics by controlling colicin release. We demonstrate that by mitigating lysis, CsrA shapes the community dynamics and determines whether the three strains coexist. Indeed, a mutant producer that is unable to suppress colicin release, causes the collapse of biodiversity in media that would otherwise support co-localized growth of the three strains.
Our results show how the environmental regulation of an antagonistic trait shapes community dynamics. We demonstrate that nutrient-responsive regulation of colicin release by CsrA, determines whether colicin producer, resistant non-producer, and sensitive strains coexist at small spatial scales, or whether the sensitive strain is eradicated. This study highlights how molecular-level regulatory mechanisms that govern interference competition give rise to community-level biodiversity patterns.
KeywordsInterference competition Community dynamics Colicin Biodiversity
Competition within and between species shapes populations, governs community dynamics, and determines biodiversity -. Competition occurs in two forms: individuals compete indirectly by consuming resources and thus depriving others of those (exploitative competition); and can compete directly by harming others through antagonistic interactions (interference competition) . Direct antagonistic interactions through the production and release of antibiotics have been recognized as key drivers of microbial community dynamics ,,. Antibiotic-mediated competition is ubiquitous among bacteria and has various eco-evolutionary roles: antibiotics can kill competitors to enable the colonization of crowded habitats -, enhance virulence , and facilitate infection . In a broader ecological context, antibiotic-mediated competition has been suggested to drive diversification ,, and promote biodiversity ,-. It is becoming increasingly clear that stress responses to DNA damage or nutrient limitation are major inducers of antibiotic production in many species . However, it remains unclear how the regulation of antibiotic-mediated antagonistic traits shapes competition in bacterial communities. We therefore lack understanding of how environmental cues, through such regulatory processes, influence the biodiversity of bacterial communities.
We investigate colicin-mediated chemical warfare by Escherichia coli in spatially structured habitats. E. coli actively compete with fellow members of the same (and closely related) species by producing narrow-spectrum proteinaceous antibiotics—colicins—and releasing those into the environment . Colicinogeny is widespread in natural E. coli populations: approximately half of all naturally occurring E. coli is capable of producing at least one type of colicin, while more than half is resistant to at least one colicin, a small fraction of naturally occurring E. coli is sensitive to all existing colicins -. Despite the killing potential that colicin production provides, colicin producer strains often coexist with sensitive and resistant non-producing strains in natural communities ,. This apparent paradox is often explained by means of a cyclical competitive hierarchy—akin to the game of rock-paper-scissors—that may arise from the interaction of a colicin-producer, a resistant non-producer, and a colicin-sensitive strain ,,,. Theoretical studies indicate that in a spatially structured habitat, a cyclical competitive hierarchy can stabilize community dynamics and thus support biodiversity -. In a laboratory implementation of such a system, an E. coli strain producing colicin E2 (having DNase activity), a resistant non-producer strain, and a strain sensitive to colicin E2 have been shown to coexist in a dynamic equilibrium: on solid agar plates colicin producers killed and displaced sensitive cells, sensitive cells outgrew and displaced resistant cells that in turn displaced producers. By contrast, in a well-mixed flask lacking spatial structure, biodiversity was rapidly lost because of eradication of the sensitive strain and subsequent outcompetition of the producer by the resistant strain .
Coexistence (i.e. the long-term sympatric persistence of types ), however, critically depends on the relative competitiveness of the three strains and is sensitive to factors as community size, habitat structure, killing range of the producer, and expression of the colicin operon -. Additional file 1: Figure S1 presents a spatially explicit model that illustrates the community dynamics for various interaction scenarios. Our model shows that asymmetric competition (e.g. the competitive advantage of producer versus sensitive is larger than resistant versus producer) indeed jeopardizes biodiversity and often leads to the extinction of two strains. As experimental studies indicate that strong asymmetries indeed exist in the colicin-mediated community , it is relevant to ask if rock-paper-scissors mediated coexistence of the three strains is robust, or whether it is confined to a small region of parameter-space. Regulation of the colicin operon is likely to be essential in determining the outcome of colicin-mediated competition, as the conditions under which colicin is produced and released govern the community dynamics. Recent findings suggest a link between nutrient conditions (exploitative competition) and colicin production and release (interference competition): production of colicins 1b, K, and the lysis protein of colicin E7, are controlled by nutrient-responsive regulators ,,. Environmental factors such as the type and amount of nutrients present in a habitat, may thus have a marked impact on colicin-mediated community dynamics and the persistence of biodiversity.
Here, we study the community dynamics of colicin E2 producing, sensitive, and resistant non-producing strains in spatially structured habitats. Using microfabrication, we create microhabitats that mimic the micro-scale spatial structure of natural bacterial habitats such as soil and the gut -. We investigate the influence of different growth media on community dynamics and the persistence of biodiversity in those habitats. A fluorescent reporter for colicin production allows us to determine under what conditions colicin is being produced and released. Our results demonstrate that E. coli utilizes information regarding nutrient conditions to decide whether or not to autolyse and release colicin into the environment. Colicin release, in turn, affects the community dynamics and translates into either loss or persistence of biodiversity in the habitats. In particular, we reveal the significance of carbon storage regulator A (CsrA) in integrating autolysis rates from nutrient availability by E. coli. We furthermore show that the three strains can coexist without interacting according to a rock-paper-scissors game and discover an alternative path to coexistence in which CsrA-mediated lysis repression allows producer, sensitive, and resistant cells to thrive in close proximity. Exploring and manipulating the interplay between the environment, regulation, and community dynamics, allows us to understand how molecular-level regulatory mechanisms that govern interference competition give rise to community-level biodiversity patterns.
Community dynamics and the persistence of biodiversity depend on nutrient type
In order to assess the impact of the three growth media on biodiversity quantitatively, we measured the biodiversity of replicate microhabitat experiments by calculating Shannon's diversity index through time. Shannon’s index reflects the relative abundance of strains in a microhabitat and peaks at a value of ln(3)≈1.1 when all three strains are present at equal frequencies. In both LB and M9-amino acids medium, the biodiversity index stabilizes at values ≤ ln(2), the maximum biodiversity attainable when only 2 strains co-inhabit a habitat (Figure 2D,E). This value reflects the presence of producer and resistant E. coli and indicates the (near) extinction of sensitive cells. Often a small number of nondividing (dormant) sensitive cells could be discerned hours after inoculation in LB or M9-amino acids, indicating that sensitive cells are not always entirely eradicated. Since colicin-mediated killing is an active process requiring energy , dormant sensitive cells assuming a persister-like state might remain unaffected by colicin as long as they do not resume growth. As evidenced by the per-capita growth rates all three strains show growth in M9-glucose (Figure 2C). This growth translates into a biodiversity index with a value that exceeds ln(2) confirming the long-term coexistence of the three strains (see Figure 2F). Colicin-producing cells do not prevent the growth of colicin sensitive cells in M9-glucose, even when growing in close proximity to each other (i.e. in the same habitat patch). Co-localized growth indicates that coexistence of the three strains in M9-glucose is not the result of spatial rock-paper-scissors dynamics but is caused by other factors, possibly by differential regulation of the colicin operon in different growth media.
To probe whether the community exhibits different dynamics in another spatial setting, we repeated the experiments performed in LB medium by inoculating the producer strain at one end of the habitat, and the resistant and sensitive strains at the opposite end (asymmetric inoculation, three replicate experiments). In this scenario, the two populations—producer only versus sensitive and resistant—enter the habitat ∼13 mm apart and expand towards each other. When asymmetrically inoculated, competition will mainly take place at the colliding population fronts. In contrast, when inoculating all strains from both sides as discussed above, the three strains come face-to-face in all patches and competitive interactions occur between smaller populations over smaller spatial scales. We observed that in the asymmetric scenario, all three strains grow to high densities but the populations do not mix. Instead, an unoccupied zone of several hundred micrometers forms in between the producer population on one side and the resistant/sensitive population on the other (see Additional file 3: Figure S2). This shows that although coexistence of the three strains is not possible in LB at the scale of micrometers (within patches), the three strains may coexist by spatial separation at larger scales (millimeters).
Colicin induction and release depend on nutrient conditions
The co-localized growth of sensitive and producer cells in M9-glucose prompted us to investigate the nutrient dependence of expression of the colicin E2 operon. Due to producer-sensitive coexistence in M9-glucose, we hypothesized that expression of the colicin operon is likely to be lower in M9-glucose when compared to M9-amino acids and LB medium. Transcription of the colicin E2 operon is part of the SOS regulon and thus strongly repressed by LexA . When the SOS response is induced, RecA stimulates autocleavage of LexA allowing transcription of the colicin operon. The colicin E2 protein is encoded by the first gene in the operon, followed by the immunity gene and the lysis gene (see Additional file 4: Figure S3 for a schematic representation). Premature transcription of the downstream lysis gene is prevented by a transcriptional terminator between the immunity and lysis genes; lysis gene expression thus relies on transcriptional readthrough and is transcribed at a lower rate than colicin E2. SOS responsive genes are generally subject to expression heterogeneity  and since colicin is released through self-destructive lysis, it follows that the operon can only be expressed in a fraction of the population to ensure population viability .
To interpret these observations, it is important to realize that the expression distributions in Figure 3A-D represent cells that induced the colicin operon, but did not yet lyse. High induction levels can therefore have multiple causes: they may result from strong induction of the colicin operon, from a reduced lysis rate, or both. In order to distinguish between these scenarios we created a lysis knock-out by replacing the lysis gene (cel) with yfp. Analyzing the YFP signal of this strain showed that expression of the lysis gene is not directly correlated with activity of the SOS promoter, indicating that additional regulation is at play (see Figure 3E-H). In LB medium, the lysis gene is highly expressed during exponential phase and decreases in activity upon entry into stationary phase. The simultaneous increase in E2crimson signal (i.e. colicin production, Figure 3A) is thus likely to be (partly) caused by E2crimson build-up due to lysis repression in stationary phase. In M9-amino acids, M9-glucose, and M9-glucose + amino acids the lysis gene is expressed at lower levels when compared to LB medium, which may lead to intracellular colicin build-up. In M9-glucose and M9-glucose + amino acids stationary-phase cultures, the high E2crimson signal (reporting colicin expression) and small population fraction expressing YFP (reporting cel expression) together suggest that when colicin production is induced in the presence of glucose, lysis is strongly repressed. Although expression of the lysis gene is certainly lower in M9-amino acids when compared to LB, there is significant expression of the lysis gene in late exponential and early stationary phase when cells are cultured in M9 medium supplemented with amino acids only. Expression at those times is strongly repressed when M9-amino acids medium is supplemented with glucose. Together these observations indicate that lysis repression and subsequent colicin build-up are triggered by high-glucose conditions, additional high amino acids content does not reverse this behavior.
CsrA determines biodiversity by modulating the lysis rate
The marked effect that CsrA has on producer cell lysis led us to hypothesize that the co-localized growth of sensitive, producer, and resistant cells that we observed in microhabitats filled with M9-glucose medium (Figure 1E and H) may be explained by a reduced lysis rate of the producers. In this scenario, producers do indeed produce colicin in M9-glucose but refrain from releasing it, which safeguards sensitive cells growing in close proximity. In order to address whether this indeed is the case, we investigated the community dynamics of wild-type sensitive and resistant strains, and a producer strain carrying the mutant pColE2-TT plasmid in M9-glucose medium. In three replica microhabitat-experiments, sensitive cells initially showed some growth but ceased growth before resistant and producer cells did (see Figure 6). The growth arrest of sensitive cells in the presence of producers carrying pColE2-TT in M9-glucose, shows that the community dynamics clearly differ from the M9-glucose microhabitat experiments performed with the wild-type producer, where the sensitive strain sustained growth longer than the resistant and producer strains. In agreement with the wild-type community in LB, filamentous growth of sensitive cells could be observed in M9-glucose in the presence of producers carrying pColE2-TT, indicating that producers carrying the mutant plasmid indeed release colicin into the environment and harm sensitive cells. These results demonstrate that CsrA-mediated lysis-repression has a strong impact on the community dynamics of colicin producing, resistant, and sensitive strains and suggest a key role for CsrA in determining whether biodiversity in this community will be maintained or lost.
Tracking the dynamics of colicin producer, resistant non-producer, and sensitive cells at high spatiotemporal resolution has revealed that community dynamics depend critically on the environment. Our results demonstrate that modulation of the colicin release rate determines whether the three strains coexist at small spatial scales, or whether the sensitive strain is eradicated. This observation establishes a direct link between nutrient availability (exploitative competition) and chemical warfare (interference competition). This coupling is implemented by CsrA, which translates environmental cues into antibiotic-mediated community dynamics. CsrA was first discovered as a master regulator of carbon metabolism , but is now also emerging as a regulator of virulence genes, toxin secretion, and other behaviors -. Both carbon metabolism and toxin secretion are important parameters for determining the success of E. coli when colonizing its host ,. Our findings place CsrA at the nexus of these processes and it is therefore possible that CsrA is an important factor in determining the colonization success of commensal and pathogenic E. coli. Competition between colicin producing and sensitive strains in mouse models has yielded outcomes ranging from eradication of the sensitive strain to long-term coexistence ,-, our results suggest that variations in nutrient conditions may explain these differences.
Chemical warfare through colicin production and release is costly behavior, the strategy adopted by producer cells thus likely reflects how the competitive benefit of chemical warfare compares to its costs. Our experiments show that the chemical warfare strategy adopted by colicin producer cells depends on nutrient conditions: colicin production and release are highest when cells grow exponentially on peptides and amino acids (e.g. in LB medium) whereas colicin release is low in stationary-phase glucose cultures. Both the availability and the type of nutrients thus affect whether producer cells engage in chemical warfare or refrain from it. The nutrient-availability dependence of the chemical warfare strategy can be understood from the perspective of a cost-benefit analysis, however, the adaptive virtue of the nutrient-type dependence is unclear at present. The situation where producer cells produce colicin but do not release it (i.e. stationary-phase glucose cultures) suggests colicin is being stored for later use, possibly as a bet-hedging strategy.
Previous work  suggested that at large spatial scales (mm–cm range) for a specific temporal modulation, rock-paper-scissors game dynamics can lead to long-term coexistence of the three strains in LB medium (note that ref.  removed all produced colicin from the system and replenished nutrients at daily intervals). Yet, despite its appealing simplicity as a mechanism to maintain biodiversity, stable rock-paper-scissors game dynamics may be confined to a relatively minor region of parameter space . The periodic removal of colicin for instance, effectively increases the cost of production which is to the advantage of the sensitive strain and may be essential for the long-term stability of rock-paper-scissors dynamics. Increasing the cost of production may partially compensate for the asymmetry in interactions (i.e. the competitive advantage of the producer versus sensitive being greater than the advantage of the sensitive versus resistant and resistant versus producer ) which may otherwise lead to extinction of the sensitive strain as our experimental and modeling efforts in conjunction with theory  suggest. In our system, the three strains do not coexist in LB when co-colonizing a microhabitat. Only when the strains are colonizing the microhabitat from opposite ends, the populations remain spatially separated and coexist at the scale of the entire habitat, not within patches. Theory has suggested that cellular dispersal is a key parameter in determining community dynamics , in addition to that, the killing range of colicin—set by its diffusion rate—is likely to be an important parameter setting the spatial scale at which coexistence emerges .
The observation that colicin-producer and sensitive cells show exponential growth in close proximity in M9-glucose, together with our characterization of colicin-operon expression, puts forward an alternative hypothesis explaining coexistence of the three strains. When growing on sugars, the lysis rate of colicin producing cells drops drastically and interference competition is reduced to a minimum, this allows sensitive, resistant and producer cells to coexist at micrometer scales. In contrast, when growing on amino acids and small peptides, producers are more prone to produce and release colicin, and biodiversity is only maintained at larger spatial scales. It is interesting to note that in some natural habitats E. coli mainly grows on sugars and sugar acids (i.e. the intestine), whereas amino acids and peptides are the source of growth in other habitats (i.e. the urinary tract) ,. Our results demonstrate that colicin-mediated chemical warfare results in population dynamics with disparate trajectories in these environments. The available nutrients in a habitat thus appear to be an strong driver of interference competition which may determine the success of colonizing strains. Our study highlights the importance of the regulation of antagonistic traits, which, in response to environmental cues, can have a profound influence on biodiversity.
Strains and growth conditions
All strains used in this study are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1 and were derived from the strains used in ref.  originally described in ref. . Fragments coding for fluorescent proteins and kanamycin resistance controlled by the lac promoter were integrated into the chromosome, replacing the lacIZ region, using the Quick & Easy E.coli Gene Deletion Kit (Gene Bridges). Colicin E2 producer strains were obtained by transforming the fluorescently labelled sensitive strains (BN1051, BN1054, BN1073) with purified pColE2 plasmid isolated from an overnight culture of strain BN1010 (the producer strain used in ref. ) using the QIAGEN Mini-Prep kit, to yield strains BN1079, BN0181, and BN1083. The TurboRFP labelled producer strain (BN1173) was directly derived from BN1010 by inserting the TurboRFP fragment into its lacIZ region. TurboRFP and mCherry labelled colicin E2 resistant non-producer strains were obtained by plating an overnight culture of sensitive strains (BN171 and BN1073) on colicin E2 selective plates to obtain strains BN1175 and BN1075 (LB plates containing 100 μL crude colicin E2 obtained and filter sterilized from an overnight culture of producer cells were used for selection). After overnight incubation at 37◦C on colicin E2 selective plates, resistant colonies were selected. CFP and YFP labelled resistant strains (BN1056 and BN1085, respectively) were directly derived from BN1011 by inserting fragments coding for the fluorescent proteins in the lacIZ region. Sequencing of the btuB region of all colicin E2-resistant strains revealed the presence of IS2 elements. It has previously been reported that disruption of the btuB receptor confers colicin E2 resistance . M9 broth (Sigma-Aldrich) and Lysogeny broth (LB, Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. M9 minimal medium was prepared by adjusting the pH of the M9 broth to 7.4 and adding MgSO 4 and CaCl 2 to final concentrations of 2 mM and 100 μM, respectively. To obtain M9-glucose, 0.4% glucose was added to M9 minimal medium; to obtain M9-amino acids, 1% protein hydrolysate amicase (Fluka) was added to M9 minimal medium; to obtain M9-glucose + amino acids, 0.4% glucose and 1% protein hydrolysate amicase was added to M9 minimal medium; 0.4% glycerol was added to M9 minimal medium to obtain M9-glycerol; M9-acetate was prepared by adding 0.55% acetate to M9 minimal medium. All cultures were grown at 37◦C and shaken at 200 rpm.
Design and construction of the colicin-promoter reporter-plasmid pProm-E2
Primers 5' – GTTTCTTCCGATCGGACATGTCCATGAGTATGTGATATCCGG – 3' and 5' – GAAGAAA CCTCGAGCGGCCACCATTAATGTTACC – 3' were used to amplify the promoter region of pColE2, yielding a PCR product with PciI and XhoI restriction-site overhangs. This included an upstream terminator region, SOS-box, sigma-factor binding site, ribosomal binding site, and the first 29 amino-acids encoding for colicin E2. The purified PCR product was restricted using PciI and XhoI, purified (25 ng/ μL) and ligated into linearized pE2-Crimson (Clontech, linearized by PciI and SalI, 30 ng/ μL) to yield plasmid pProm-E2. Strains BN1010, BN1079, and BN1081 were subsequently transformed by electroporation of the heat-inactivated ligation mixture and plated out onto ampicillin-containing plates for over-night incubation.
Design and construction of pColE2-TT
The WT plasmid pColE2 was PCR amplified using the mutagenesis primers 5' – GGCATTCTTTCACATTAAGGAGTCGTTATGAAAAAAATAACAG – 3' and 5' – CTGTTATTTTTTTCATAACGACTCCTTAATGTGAAAGAATGCC – 3'. These primers introduced the AC to TT mutation, which releases CsrA repression of the cel transcript . Transformants were selected on Colicin E2-containing LB-agar and mutants were screened using plasmid sequencing.
Design and construction of pColE-cel::EYFP
In-frame replacement of the cel gene by EYFP resulted in a mutant plasmid that retained the wild-type 5'UTR (CsrA binding site) and 12 nucleotides 5' of the lysis gene, followed by a 6 nucleotide GGATCC "scar". The pColE2 backbone was amplified using primers 5' – AAGGATCCTATTTTTTTCATAACGACTCCTTGTTGTG – 3' and 5' – AATCTAGACCCGAAATCCTCTTTGACAAAAACAAAGC – 3', which introduced a BamHI and an XbaI site to the 5' and 3' ends of the plasmid backbone, respectively. pEYFP (BD biosciences) was amplified using 5' – AAGGATCCGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG – 3' and 5' – AATCTAGATTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCG – 3'. Both PCR fragments were digested using XbaI and BamHI and ligated. TOP 10 E. coli (Invitrogen) were transformed with the product of the ligation reaction and mutants were screened by colony PCR and confirmed by sequencing.
Flow cytometry was performed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) controlled using FlowJo software. YFP was excited at 488 nm and emission was filtered using a 530/30 band-pass filter, E2crimson was excited at 561 nm and emission was filtered with a 615/25 band-pass filter. Overnight cultures were diluted to an optical density of 0.01 in 30 mL growth medium in 500 mL erlenmeyer flasks. Cultures were incubated at 37◦C and shaken at 200 rpm. At set time intervals 100 μL of culture was taken, diluted in 1 mL growth medium and gently vortexed for 5 seconds to be used for flow cytometry. At least 4×104 cells were counted per sample. Bacteria were identified by forward and side scatter and data was analyzed in a custom made MatLab script.
Microhabitats were fabricated in silicon following a previously published protocol . The microhabitats consist of 85 patches (100 × 100 × 15 μm) connected by corridors (50 × 5 × 15 μm) and are connected to reservoirs by 180 nm shallow slits. The slits prevent bacteria from entering the reservoirs but allow the diffusion of e.g. nutrients and waste. The total volume of the reservoirs is ∼15 times larger than the total volume of the bacterial habitat ensuring that enough nutrients are available for long-term experiments. Two ports to inoculate bacteria were drilled through the silicon, one at each end of the habitat. Microhabitats were closed by bonding to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated cover-slips. Strains were grown overnight (37◦C, 200 rpm) and separately diluted 1/100 in fresh medium, all culturing prior to inoculating the microhabitat was done in the same medium as used during the experiment. After growing to mid-log phase, cells were spun down and washed in the appropriate medium to prevent colicin from the producer culture to carry over to the microhabitat. The three strains were mixed at equal frequency (i.e. all strains 1/3) for symmetrically inoculated experiments and 2 μL of the mixture was applied to both inlet ports. Asymmetrically inoculated experiments were performed by inoculating the sensitive and resistant strains at equal frequency in one port and inoculating the producer strain at the opposite port. Before inoculation microhabitats were filled with fresh medium.
Image acquisition and analysis
Microhabitats were imaged at 15 minute (LB and M9-amino acids) or 30 minute (M9-glucose) intervals using an inverted Olympus IX81 microscope equipped with a 20x (N.A.= 0.75) objective, a Neo sCMOS camera (Andor) and a motorized stage (Marzhauser) controlled using μManager software . The sample was illuminated using an X-cite 120 Q (Lumen dynamics) light source. The microscope was enclosed in a home-built environmental chamber warmed to 37◦C. All experimental data presented in this work were obtained at 37◦C, additional microhabitat community-dynamics experiments performed at 26◦C showed dynamics similar to experiments performed at 37◦C. Images were processed in MatLab using a custom script. Fluorescent proteins do not have the same brightness, and more importantly react in different ways to growth phase and environmental factors like conditioning of the medium and population density. As a result, fluorescent intensity is not a good proxy for measuring biomass. To circumvent the problems associated with intensity measurements, we converted all images to occupancy data using a previously published protocol  which measures the area a strain occupies.
We thank F. Wu, S. v. Vliet, B. Beaumont and other members of the Bionanoscience Department for fruitful discussions and S. Donkers for technical assistance. We are grateful to M. Ackermann (ETH Zurich) for critical reading of a previous version of this manuscript. This research was supported by the European Research Council Advanced Grant #247072 to C.D.
- Little AE, Robinson CJ, Peterson SB, Raffa KF, Handelsman J: Rules of engagement: interspecies interactions that regulate microbial communities. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008, 62: 375-401. 10.1146/annurev.micro.030608.101423.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Foster KR, Bell T: Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr Biol. 2012, 22: 1845-1850. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB: Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009, 8: 15-25. 10.1038/nrmicro2259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Case TJ, Gilpin ME: Interference competition and niche theory. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1974, 71: 3073-3077. 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3073.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cordero OX, Wildschutte H, Kirkup B, Proehl S, Ngo L, Hussain F, Le Roux F, Mincer T, Polz MF: Ecological populations of bacteria act as socially cohesive units of antibiotic production and resistance. Science. 2012, 337: 1228-1231. 10.1126/science.1219385.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vetsigian K, Jajoo R, Kishony R: Structure and evolution of streptomyces interaction networks in soil and in silico. PLoS Biol2011, 9:1001184.
- Dethlefsen L, Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Relman DA: Assembly of the human intestinal microbiota. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006, 21: 517-523. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holt KE, Nga TVT, Thanh DP, Vinh H, Kim DW, Tra MPV, Campbell JI, Hoang NVM, Vinh NT, Van Minh P, Thuy C, Nga T, Thompson C, Dung T, Nhu N, Vinh P, Tuyet P, Phuc H, Lien N, Phu B, Ai N, Tien N, Dong N, Parry C, Hien T, Farrar J, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Thomson N, Baker S: Tracking the establishment of local endemic populations of an emergent enteric pathogen. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2013, 110: 17522-17527. 10.1073/pnas.1308632110.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirkup BC, Riley MA: Antibiotic-mediated antagonism leads to a bacterial game of rock-paper-scissors in vivo. Nature. 2004, 428: 412-414. 10.1038/nature02429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inglis RF, Gardner A, Cornelis P, Buckling A: Spite and virulence in the bacteriumPseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2009, 106: 5703-5707. 10.1073/pnas.0810850106.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nedialkova LP, Denzler R, Koeppel MB, Diehl M, Ring D, Wille T, Gerlach RG, Stecher B: Inflammation fuels colicin ib-dependent competition of salmonella serovar typhimurium and e. coli in enterobacterial blooms. PLoS Pathogens2014, 10:1003844.
- Riley MA: Molecular mechanisms of bacteriocin evolution. Ann Rev Genet. 1998, 32: 255-278. 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.255.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walker D, Rolfe M, Thompson A, Moore G. R, James R, Hinton JC, Kleanthous C: Transcriptional profiling of colicin-induced cell death ofEscherichia coliMG1655 identifies potential mechanisms by which bacteriocins promote bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 866-869. 10.1128/JB.186.3.866-869.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerr B, Riley MA, Feldman MW, Bohannan BJM: Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature. 2002, 418: 171-174. 10.1038/nature00823.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Czárán TL, Hoekstra RF, Pagie L: Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2002, 99: 786-790. 10.1073/pnas.012399899.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chao L, Levin BR: Structured habitats and the evolution of anticompetitor toxins in bacteria. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1981, 78: 6324-6328. 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cornforth DM, Foster KR: Competition sensing: the social side of bacterial stress responses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013, 11: 285-293. 10.1038/nrmicro2977.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riley MA, Wertz JE: Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 117-137. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feldgarden M, Riley MA: High levels of colicin resistance inEscherichia coli. Evolution. 1998, 52: 1270-1276. 10.2307/2411296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riley MA, Gordon DM: A survey of col plasmids in natural isolates of escherichia coli and an investigation into the stability of col-plasmid lineages. J Gen Microbiol. 1992, 138: 1345-1352. 10.1099/00221287-138-7-1345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gordon DM, Riley MA, Pinou T: Temporal changes in the frequency of colicinogeny in escherichia coli from house mice. Microbiology. 1998, 144 (Pt 8): 2233-2240. 10.1099/00221287-144-8-2233.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riley MA, Gordon DM: The ecological role of bacteriocins in bacterial competition. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7: 129-133. 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01459-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura M, Iwasa Y: Competition by allelopathy proceeds in traveling waves: colicinimmune starins aids colicin-sensitive strains. Theor Pop Biol. 2000, 57: 131-144. 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Durrett R, Levin S: Allelopathy in spatially distributed populations. J Theor Biol. 1997, 185: 165-171. 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0292.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reichenbach T, Mobilia M, Frey E: Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games. Nature. 2007, 448: 1046-1049. 10.1038/nature06095.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hubbell SP: The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32) vol. 32. 2001, Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Venkat S, Pleimling M: Mobility and asymmetry effects in one-dimensional rock-paper-scissors games. Phys Rev E2010, 81:021917.
- He Q, Mobilia M, Täuber UC: Spatial rock-paper-scissors models with inhomogeneous reaction rates. Phys Rev E2010, 82:051909.
- Szczesny B, Mobilia M, Rucklidge AM: When does cyclic dominance lead to stable spiral waves?EPL (Europhysics Lett)2013, 102:28012.,
- Müller APO, Gallas JA: How community size affects survival chances in cyclic competition games that microorganisms play. Phys Rev E2010, 82:052901.
- Nahum JR, Harding BN, Kerr B: Evolution of restraint in a structured rock–paper–scissors community. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2011, 108: 10831-10838. 10.1073/pnas.1100296108.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butala M, Sonjak S, Kamenšek S, Hodošˇcek M, Browning DF, Žgur-Bertok D, Busby SJ: Double locking of anEscherichia colipromoter by two repressors prevents premature colicin expression and cell lysis. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 86: 129-139. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08179.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang T-Y, Sung Y-M, Lei G-S, Romeo T, Chak K-F: Posttranscriptional repression of thecelgene of the ColE7 operon by the RNA-binding protein CsrA ofEscherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: 3936-3951. 10.1093/nar/gkq177.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vos M, Wolf AB, Jennings SJ, Kowalchuk GA: Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013, 37: 936-954.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brune A, Friedrich M: Microecology of the termite gut: structure and function on a microscale. Curr Opinion Microbiol. 2000, 3: 263-269. 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00087-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Vliet S, Hol FJ, Weenink T, Galajda P, Keymer JE: The effects of chemical interactions and culture history on the colonization of structured habitats by competing bacterial populations. BMC Microbiol2014, 14:116.
- Keymer JE, Galajda P, Muldoon C, Park S, Austin RH: Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2006, 103: 17290-17295. 10.1073/pnas.0607971103.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hol FJ, Galajda P, Nagy K, Woolthuis RG, Dekker C, Keymer JE: Spatial structure facilitates cooperation in a social dilemma Empirical evidence from a bacterial community. PLOS ONE2013, 8:77042.
- Vankemmelbeke M, Zhang Y, Moore GR, Kleanthous C, Penfold CN, James R: Energy-dependent immunity protein release during tol-dependent nuclease colicin translocation. J Biol Chem. 1893, 284: 2-18941.Google Scholar
- Cascales E, Buchanan SK, Kleanthous C, Lloubès R, Postle K, Riley M, Slatin S, Cavard D: Colicin biology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007, 71: 158-229. 10.1128/MMBR.00036-06.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamenšek S, Podlesek Z, Gillor O, Zgur-Bertok D: Genes regulated by theEscherichia coli, SOS repressor lexA exhibit heterogeneous expression. BMC Microbiol2010, 10:283.,
- Ackermann M, Stecher B, Freed NE, Songhet P, Hardt W-D, Doebeli M: Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise. Nature. 2008, 454: 987-90. 10.1038/nature07067.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardy K, Harwood C, Meynell G: Expression of colicin factor E2-P9. Mol Gen Genet MGG. 1974, 131: 313-331. 10.1007/BF00264862.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eraso JM, Chidambaram M, Weinstock GM: Increased production of colicin E1 in stationary phase. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 1928-1935.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romeo T, Gong M, Liu MY, Brun-Zinkernagel A: Identification and molecular characterization ofcsrA, a pleiotropic gene fromEscherichia, coli that affects glycogen biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, cell size, and surface properties. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 4744-4755.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucchetti-Miganeh C, Burrowes E, Baysse C, Ermel G: The post-transcriptional regulator CsrA plays a central role in the adaptation of bacterial pathogens to different stages of infection in animal hosts. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 16-29. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/012286-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhatt S, Anyanful A, Kalman D: CsrA and TnaB coregulate tryptophanase activity to promote exotoxin-induced killing ofCaenorhabditis elegans, by enteropathogenicEscherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193: 4516-4522. 10.1128/JB.05197-11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, Simecka JW, Hart ME, Romeo T: Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA ofEscherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 290-301. 10.1128/JB.184.1.290-301.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adamson DN, Lim HN: Rapid and robust signaling in the csra cascade via rna-protein interactions and feedback regulation. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2013, 110: 13120-13125. 10.1073/pnas.1308476110.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang D-E, Smalley DJ, Tucker DL, Leatham MP, Norris WE, Stevenson SJ, Anderson AB, Grissom JE, Laux DC, Cohen PS, Conway T: Carbon nutrition ofEscherichia coli, in the mouse intestine. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 7427-7432. 10.1073/pnas.0307888101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillor O, Giladi I, Riley MA: Persistence of colicinogenicEscherichia coli, in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. BMC Microbiology2009, 9:165.,
- Ikari NS, Kenton DM, Young VM: Interaction in the germfree mouse intestine of colicinogenic and colicin-sensitive microorganisms. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and MedicineSociety for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 130. 1969, Royal Society of Medicine, New York, 1280-1284.Google Scholar
- Kelstrup J, Gibbons R: Inactivation of bacteriocins in the intestinal canal and oral cavity. J Bacteriol1969, 99:888.
- Hardy KG: Colicinogeny and related phenomena. Bacteriol Rev1975, 39:464.
- Weber MF, Poxleitner G, Hebisch E, Frey E, Opitz M: Chemical warfare and survival strategies in bacterial range expansions. J R Soc Interface2014, 11:20140172.
- Alteri CJ, Smith SN, Mobley HL: Fitness ofEscherichia coli, during urinary tract infection requires gluconeogenesis and the tca cycle. PLoS Pathogens2009, 5:1000448.,
- Mock M, Pugsley AP: The BtuB group col plasmids and homology between the colicins they encode. J Bacteriol. 1982, 150: 1069-1076.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feldgarden M, Riley MA: The phenotypic and fitness effects of colicin resistance inEscherichia coli, k-12. Evolution. 1999, 53 (Pt 4): 1019-1027. 10.2307/2640807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N: Computer control of microscopes usingμmanager. Curr Protoc Mol Biol2010:14.20.1-14.20.17.,
- Liggett TM: Interacting Particle Systems, New York: Springer.
- Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3406-3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.