Open Access

Cambrian suspension-feeding tubicolous hemichordates

BMC Biology201614:56

DOI: 10.1186/s12915-016-0271-4

Received: 4 April 2016

Accepted: 8 June 2016

Published: 7 July 2016

Abstract

Background

The combination of a meager fossil record of vermiform enteropneusts and their disparity with the tubicolous pterobranchs renders early hemichordate evolution conjectural. The middle Cambrian Oesia disjuncta from the Burgess Shale has been compared to annelids, tunicates and chaetognaths, but on the basis of abundant new material is now identified as a primitive hemichordate.

Results

Notable features include a facultative tubicolous habit, a posterior grasping structure and an extensive pharynx. These characters, along with the spirally arranged openings in the associated organic tube (previously assigned to the green alga Margaretia), confirm Oesia as a tiered suspension feeder.

Conclusions

Increasing predation pressure was probably one of the main causes of a transition to the infauna. In crown group enteropneusts this was accompanied by a loss of the tube and reduction in gill bars, with a corresponding shift to deposit feeding. The posterior grasping structure may represent an ancestral precursor to the pterobranch stolon, so facilitating their colonial lifestyle. The focus on suspension feeding as a primary mode of life amongst the basal hemichordates adds further evidence to the hypothesis that suspension feeding is the ancestral state for the major clade Deuterostomia.

Keywords

Enteropneusta Hemichordata Cambrian Burgess Shale

Background

Hemichordates are central to our understanding of deuterostome evolution. The two classes (tubicolous Pterobranchia and vermiform Enteropneusta) are monophyletic [13], but are morphologically disparate (however, see [4, 5] for an alternate viewpoint of Pterobranchia as sister to the family Harrimaniidae within a paraphyletic Enteropneusta). Accordingly they give only generalized clues as to both the anatomy and mode of life of the last common ancestor as well as its connections to the sister phylum Echinodermata (collectively Ambulacraria). The resistant tubaria of pterobranchs (notably the Paleozoic graptolites [6]) provide an adequate fossil record, but in contrast that of the enteropneusts is almost non-existent [79]. One exception is a tubicolous taxon (Spartobranchus tenuis) from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale [10]. This enteropneust is closely comparable to extant harrimaniids, although its organic tube finds no modern counterpart [11]. The coeval Oesia disjuncta Walcott [12] has been compared to groups as diverse as annelids [12], appendicularian tunicates [13] and chaetognaths [14, 15], thus remaining in phylogenetic limbo. The proposed chaetognath affinity was refuted by Conway Morris [16] and a hemichordate affinity briefly suggested instead, albeit without detailed re-observation of original specimens or consideration of new material. On the basis of hundreds of specimens from the newly discovered Marble Canyon fossil locality (Kootenay National Park, British Columbia) [17], we not only identify Oesia as a primitive enteropneust but also demonstrate that it constructed the perforated tube-like fossils previously assigned to Margaretia dorus and interpreted as thalli of a green alga similar to Caulerpa [18].

Results

Oesia possesses the canonical enteropneust body plan of proboscis, collar and elongate trunk (Figs. 1, 2a, b) but is unusual in that posterior to the pharynx there is a bilobed structure, rather than a vermiform intestine. Body length averages 53 mm (n = 187, size range 2.4–120 mm), but the width seldom exceeds 10 mm. The proboscis is relatively elongate (ratio of length to width is 1.35 ± 0.58) and variable in shape (Figs. 2a, d, e, g, h; Additional files 1A, D–F, 2A, F–I, 3C, 4). A conspicuous ovoid area at the medial base of the proboscis appears darker or more reflective than the surrounding area (Fig. 2a–c, f; Additional files 2F–I, 3C). This is interpreted as the heart-kidney-stomochord complex [11]. More irregular structures across the proboscis probably represent decayed musculature (Fig. 2c; Additional file 2F–I). The collar is rectangular, but with rounded edges (Fig. 2a–c, f, g; Additional files 1A, D–F, 2F–I, 3C, 5D, E, G). In proportion it is shorter than the proboscis (average ratio is 0.39 ± 1.12) but has an equivalent width (average proboscis to collar width is 1.08 ± 0.23 mm). At the posterior margin of the collar (Fig. 2b, c, f; Additional file 2F–I), a dark or reflective band probably represents the circum-collar ridge, while a thin, longitudinal structure between the proboscis base and collar (Fig. 2d, e; Additional file 5A, B, D–I) is interpreted as the nuchal skeleton. The pharyngeal region houses a series (about 3 bars/mm) of approximately U-shaped gill bars (Fig. 2g–j; Additional file 5A, C) but is remarkable in that it occupies approximately 80 % of the trunk length (Fig. 2a, g; Additional files 2A, C, 5D, E, G). The posterior end of the trunk is bulbous (Fig. 2b, g; Additional files 1D–E, 2H, 4, 5D, E, G) and sometimes terminates in a bilobed structure (Fig. 2a, f; Additional files 1B, C, 2A–D, F, H) that is usually wider than long (average width-to-length ratio is 1.48 ± 0.63).
Fig. 1

Schematic anatomy of Oesia disjuncta. Co: collar, Cr: circum-collar ridge, Dg: digestive groove, Pr: proboscis, Hks: heart-kidney-stomochord complex, Gb: gill bars, Gp: gill pores, Mo: mouth, Po: pores, Ps: posterior structure, Tr: trunk, Tu: tube. Dashed lines indicate transverse cross sections

Fig. 2

General morphology of Oesia disjuncta from the Burgess Shale. (Specimens in d, e and j come from the Walcott Quarry; all other specimens come from Marble Canyon). a Note bilobed posterior structure and extended pharyngeal area (ROM 63737, part and counterpart are superimposed at the dashed line). b, c Tripartite body plan and internal organs in the proboscis (ROM 63711). d, e Large proboscis and possible nuchal skeleton (USNM 509815), see also Additional file 5A–C. f Well-developed bilobed posterior structure (ROM 63713). gi Details of the pharyngeal area (h, partial counterpart of g, highlighted by vertical dashed line; i is close-up of framed area in g, ROM 63710). j Left and right pairs of gill bars preserved in lateral view (USNM 277844). Direct light images: a, b, h; polarized light images: cg, j; SEM image: i. Co: collar, Cr: circum-collar ridge, Dg: digestive groove, Dm: dorsal midline, Gb: gill bars, Hks: heart-kidney-stomochord complex, Ll: lateral side left, Lr: lateral side right, Ns: nuchal skeleton, Pr: proboscis, Ps: posterior structure, Tr: trunk. Scale bars: a = 10 mm, be = 1 mm, fh = 5 mm, i = 500 μm, j = 2 mm

The preservation of Oesia (n = 45 in Marble Canyon, n = 6 in Raymond Quarry) inside Margaretia (now a junior synonym of Oesia disjuncta) suggests an original association (Fig. 3a; Additional file 6). Only single worms are found within tubes, suggesting a solitary mode of life, although due to breakage during transport, it is conceivable that tubes may have been inhabited by more than one worm (Fig. 3b–d). Typically the tube is at least twice the width of the worm, suggesting the worm could move freely within its dwelling (Fig. 3e–j; Additional files 3B, 7, 8). Three-dimensional preservation of both sides of the tube (Fig. 4d, e) shows that the internal cavity of the tube was spacious, and that the tube was at least semi-rigid. The total length and extremities of the tubes are poorly known. This is because of either prior breakage or concealment (Fig. 4a), but at least one end (presumably the top of the tube) appears rounded and closed (Additional file 9B, C).
Fig. 3

Margaretia dorus tubes and associations with Oesia disjuncta from the Burgess Shale. Specimens in a and d come from the Raymond Quarry; all other specimens come from Marble Canyon. (ah) Taphonomic gradient of the worm inside its tube from generally poorly preserved (a) to better preserved (h); the tubes tend to preserve more poorly at Marble Canyon relative to tubes from the Raymond Quarry showing similar amounts of decay of the worm. a Holotype of M. dorus with worm preserved as a dark/reflective band along the central axis of the tube (USNM 83922). b, c Small fragments of tubes containing worms showing only few recognizable features (b: ROM 63955, c: ROM 63956). d Part of a tube excavated to reveal a poorly preserved worm inside (ROM 63715). e Tripartite body plan recognizable but worm heavily decayed (ROM 63953). f Clear posterior structure but indistinct proboscis and trunk (ROM 63957). g Poorly preserved trunk and faded tube (ROM 63952). h Close-up of framed area in g on counterpart, showing gill bars readily visible. i, j Specimen showing clear tripartite body plan and evidence of gill bars (ROM 63715). k The extant acorn worm Saccoglossus pusillus after 48 hours of decay at 25 °C showing dissociated parts, although the tripartite body plan is still recognizable. l, m O. disjuncta outside of its tube, showing extreme signs of decay comparable with k. Direct light (l) is contrasted with polarized light (m) to reveal different aspects of fossil morphology (ROM 63954). The ectoderm is fraying off, the proboscis is indistinct and the trunk has lost turgidity. Most worms preserved inside their tubes show a similar level of preservation. Direct light images: a, b, d, l; polarized light images: c, ei, m. Bi: node of bifurcation, Fe: fibrous elements, Wo: worm, other acronyms see Figs. 1 and 2. Scale bars: ac, eg, km = 10 mm, d, i = 5 mm

Fig. 4

a, b Spirally arranged pores perforate the tube (ROM 63716; see also Additional file 9A). c Two examples of multiple bifurcation points in a single specimen. Extreme size variation underscores the fragmentary nature of most tubes (left: KUMIP 204373, right: KUMIP 241392). d, e Tube showing three-dimensional preservation. d Large section of the tube has been broken off revealing the other side of the tube. e The broken segment has been placed back in its original configuration to illustrate the three-dimensionality of the tube (KUMIP 147911). f, g Close-up of the pores and fibrous texture of the tube. Individual fibres are micrometre small (ROM 63705). Bi: node of bifurcation, Fe: fibrous elements, Lo: lower surface, Po: pores, Up: upper surface, Wo: worm, other acronyms see Fig. 2. Scale bars: a, b, f, g = 5 mm, ce = 10 mm

Tubes with irregular undulations and lacking the spiral pattern were previously interpreted as prostrate subterranean rhizomes (Fig. 4.2-3 [18]). While the reassignment from alga to organically produced tube invalidates this identification, it remains plausible that subterranean, lateral extensions of the tube could serve as an anchor. In any individual the width of the tube is usually consistent along the length, but otherwise it varies considerably (4–20 mm). Occasionally a tube shows one (Fig. 3i; Additional files 7A, C, 8A–C, 9D–F) or, more rarely, two bifurcations (Fig. 4c). Each bifurcates at approximately the same angle and has the same width as the primary tube. The tube wall is perforated by spirally arranged pores (about 10 openings per revolution; Fig. 4a, b). In a single tube pore size varies. Some may be almost closed, but others have diameters equivalent to about a third of the tube width (Fig. 4a, b, d, e; Additional file 9A). Pore shape varies from circular to oblong ellipse and rhombic. That these might simply be taphonomic variations is less likely given that the specimens are preserved parallel to the bedding plane (Fig. 4a, b, g–e; Additional file 9A). The margins of the pores tend to be raised, imparting a semi-corrugated texture to the external surface of the tube (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 9A). The tube is composed of narrow fibres (about 7 μm) that are braided and/or overlain in bundles (Fig. 4f, g).

Margaretia dorus is unlike any known species of Paleozoic algae. In particular, the combination of a fibrous composition and elaborate pore architecture are inconsistent with an algal grade of organization, as are its biotic associations and size in relation to well-established Cambrian macroalgae [19]. This in turn argues against Oesia being an example of inquilinism. While the dozens of co-occurrences of O. disjuncta and its tube strongly suggest an original association, the preservation of large numbers of isolated Oesia specimens on single bedding surfaces (Additional files 3, 4) at Marble Canyon also needs an explanation. One possibility is that the association was facultative and Oesia could alternate between a tubicolous and non-tubicolous existence. Alternatively the worm may have been forced to vacate the tube as an en masse evacuation prior to final burial. This may be related to both the high-energy burial events [17] and the resultant dysoxic conditions that such events create [20], although this hypothesis is weakened by the lack of obvious exit structures (i.e. there is no evidence the worms could enter or leave the tubes at either end).

In this context, fragmentation of the tubes and dispersal during transport is perhaps a more plausible explanation as to how the worms became isolated. This appears to be reasonable given the observation that although tubes with a length of up to 544 mm are known (Fig. 4c), tubes of comparable width can be not only significantly shorter (e.g. Figs. 3b, 4c), but sometimes are even smaller than the worms themselves. A related observation is that along the tube margins showing evidence for breakage, the bundles of fibres may exhibit a pattern of ’unbraiding.’ This suggests that originally the tubes were vulnerable to damage (Fig. 3b).

The second factor is that in at least some cases the tube evidently serves to conceal the worm. For a worm to be readily visible, the tube either needs to be prepared mechanically, split more or less along the axis or be sufficiently degraded so as to allow a view of the interior. Accordingly, tubes showing such evidence of degradation also contain worms in an evident state of decay (Fig. 3b–h). In such cases worms are poorly preserved and are effectively reduced to a narrow band of reflective carbon (Fig. 3k–m). Worms in such late stages of decay also show a tendency to bend at sharp angles into semi-discrete sections (Figs. 2g, 3e, f, l, m). This appearance may represent adjacent sets of gill bars maintaining their articulation through attachment to the collagenous basal lamina, but at points where this basal lamina has degraded, the more acutely angled bending occurs [11].

Discussion

Establishing Oesia as an enteropneust that inhabited the tube previously identified as the alga Margaretia has significant implications for the Cambrian paleogeography and paleoecology of this group. Until now, Oesia was one of the rarest of Burgess Shale taxa and was restricted to the Walcott Quarry [21]. At the coeval Marble Canyon locality, however, it is amongst the five most abundant taxa [17] and occupied a key trophic position. In marked contrast, Margaretia is recorded from various Burgess Shale sites in Laurentia (including the Stephen Formation of British Columbia and the Spence and Wheeler Shales of Utah [18] — Additional file 11: Table S1), eastern Yunnan, China [22] and further afield in Siberia (originally referred to as Aldanophyton [18]) [23]. This expanded distribution suggests that enteropneusts were a significant component of many Cambrian communities (Additional file 6, Additional file 11: Table S1).

Oesia also throws important new light on the early evolution of the hemichordates. Construction of a large, complex and presumably metabolically costly tube is consistent with a sessile lifestyle. Given that pores appear to be present on all sides, we suggest that the tube (and branches) stood vertically, with the basal region embedded in the substrate and the top presumably closed (Fig. 5a). The porosity of the tube would have prevented dysoxia and also allowed access to the water column for filter feeding. Given that the tubes could exceed 50 cm (Fig. 4c), this suggests a tiering level at least equivalent to (if not above) the tallest sponges known from the Burgess Shale.
Fig. 5

a Life reconstruction with hypothetical closed terminal ends of the tubes — part of one tube partially removed to show a worm (drawing by Marianne Collins). b Phylogenetic relationship of Deuterostomia derived from [2]. Mapping of characters based on [1, 2] with our proposed hypothetical position for Oesia disjuncta as a basal hemichordate (dashed line with question mark). The position of Spartobranchus tenuis is based on a taphonomic study of extant and fossil enteropneusts [11]. Character states: 1) pharyngeal gill bars, suspension feeding; 2) notochord; 3) tubicolous; 4) miniaturization, coloniality; 5) fuselli; 6) loss of tubicolous lifestyle, deposit feeding; 7) indirect development via tornaria larva; 8) stereom, water vascular system

The strikingly extended pharynx and numerous gill bars that were employed in suspension feeding are functionally convergent with the hyperpharyngotremy seen in the tunicates [24], cephalochordates [25] and some Paleozoic jawless fish [26] (Fig. 5a). More generally, however, the pharyngeal arrangement seen in Oesia suggests that within the hemichordates as a whole suspension feeding was primitive. Whilst a few members of the basal harrimaniids facultatively filter interstitial pore water [27, 28], in extant enteropneusts the primary mode is deposit feeding, consistent with their mostly infaunal existence. Such a migration from an epifaunal existence may have been in response to increased predation pressure and as a consequence entailed significant anatomical changes. Notably in Oesia the post-pharyngeal trunk appears to lack the esophageal organ, which in extant forms serves to remove excess water from the food cord (and presumably performed the same function in Spartobranchus tenuis where it is also present; a summary of the main differences between S. tenuis and O. disjuncta can be found in Additional file 10). So too in the more derived taxa the hepatic caeca increase the absorptive area, presumably reflecting the increased demands of deposit feeding.

Oesia shares with the co-eval tubicolous S. tenuis [10] a bulbous posterior structure which may have acted as an anchor. In Oesia, however, the claw-like arrangement points to a more active role in attachment and release, perhaps as a consequence of its inhabiting a commodious tube. This interpretation draws potential comparisons to the juvenile post-anal tail of harrimaniid enteropneusts. This tail serves in ciliary locomotion and as an attachment device and may also be the homologue of the pterobranch stalk [27]. In this context, the specialized posterior structures seen in S. tenuis and O. disjuncta may actually be ancestral features. If so, these were ultimately lost in the crown group Enteropneusta, but in the Pterobranchia they helped to pave the way towards coloniality.

Conclusions

While too few morphological characters are available to permit a meaningful cladistic analysis, the unique combination of characters found in O. disjuncta encourages us to present a preliminary re-interpretation of early hemichordate evolution. First, a tubicolous, epifaunal and solitary habit are evidently primitive. The fibrous filaments of the Oesia tube have some resemblance to the fusellar fibres seen in graptolites such as the Cambrian Mastigograptus [29], as well as the comparable periderm of rhabdopleurid [30] and cephalodiscid pterobranchs [31]. An important inference is that Oesia (and Spartobranchus) possessed secretory glandular cells, presumably homologous with those located on the cephalic shield of the pterobranchs. The apparent absence of fibres in the tubes of Spartobranchus suggests that their loss may have preceded the loss of the tube itself. Concurrent with a shift to a burrowing and deposit feeding existence, the crown group enteropneusts abandoned the construction of such tubes. In contrast, the tubes of pterobranchs (and correspondingly the posterior stalk) were elaborated in parallel with their miniaturization and sessile coloniality (Fig. 5b). Crucially, the unique mix of pterobranch and acorn worm characteristics seen in Oesia suggests that an extensive pharynx and undifferentiated trunk are basal to the hemichordates, whereas Spartobranchus is more derived and is basal to the acorn worms [11]. Future discoveries of new Cambrian hemichordates will help elucidate the hypothesized transformation of the posterior structures into the pterobranch stolon and critically unveil the order of both trait acquisition and loss during the early diversification of this phylum.

Finally, the evidence that primitive enteropneusts were suspension feeders is congruent with the hypothesis that suspension feeding represents the primitive mode of life in deuterostomes [32] as a whole. In particular, it is notable that this lifestyle is seen in early stem-group echinoderms [33] and stem-group ambulacrarians [34], and is inferred in the ur-ambulacrarians [35] as well as the more problematic vetulicolians [36] and yunnanozoans [37].

Methods

Sediment overlaying sections of some specimens was removed using a micro-engraving tool with a carbide bit. Specimens were observed using a stereomicroscope and photographed using different illuminations, using direct or cross-polarized light on dry or wet specimens. Backscatter scanning electron images were obtained to visualize fine anatomical features. Measurements of morphology were made using the program ImageJ. A list of specimens used in the analysis can be found in Additional file 11: Table S1 [3847].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Fenton, D.H. Erwin and M. Florence and B. Lieberman for collections assistance at the Royal Ontario Museum, Smithsonian Institution and the University of Kansas Natural History Museum respectively. We also thank S. Loduca for helpful comments on the manuscript regarding algal affinities and locality information as well as two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Material for this study was collected under several Parks Canada Research and Collections permits. The 2014 field expedition at Marble Canyon was partially funded by a National Geographic Society research grant to J.-B. Caron. K. Nanglu’s doctoral research is supported by fellowships from the University of Toronto (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) and J.-B. Caron’s NSERC Discovery Grant (number 341944). This is Royal Ontario Museum Burgess Shale project number 63.

Authors’ contributions

KN and JBC took photos of specimens. KN took measurements of all specimens. All authors made observations and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto
(2)
Department of Natural History Palaeobiology, Royal Ontario Museum
(3)
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge
(4)
Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal

References

  1. Cameron CB. A phylogeny of the hemichordates based on morphological characters. Can J Zool. 2005;83:196–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Peterson KJ, Su YH, Arnone MI, Swalla B, King BL. MicroRNAs support the monophyly of enteropneust hemichordates. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol. 2013;320:368–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon JT, Kocot KM, Waits DS, Weese DA, Swalla BJ, Santos SR, et al. Phylogenomic resolution of the hemichordate and echinoderm clade. Curr Biol. 2014;1–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.016.
  4. Halanych KM, Cannon JT, Mahon AR, Swalla BJ, Smith CR. Modern Antarctic acorn worms form tubes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stach T. Larval anatomy of the pterobranch Cephalodiscus gracilis supports secondarily derived sessility concordant with molecular phylogenies. Naturwissenschaften. 2013;100:1187–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitchell CE, Melchin MJ, Cameron CB, Maletz J. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that Rhabdopleura is an extant graptolite. Lethaia. 2013;46:34–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Arduini P, Pinna G, Terruzzi G. Megaderaion sinemuriense n.g. n.sp. a new fossil enteropneust of the Sinemurian of Osteno in Lombardy. Atti Soc Ital Sci Nat Mus Civ Sotria Nat Milano. 1981;122:104.Google Scholar
  8. Maletz J. Hemichordata (Pterobranchia, Enteropneusta) and the fossil record. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2014;398:16–27. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.06.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Alessandrello A, Bracchi G, Riou B. Polychaete, sipunculan and enteropneust worms from the lower Callovian (Middle Jurassic) of La Voulte-sur-Rhône (Ardèche, France). Atti Soc Ital Sci Nat Mus Civ Sotria Nat Milano. 2004;32:3–14.
  10. Caron J-B, Morris SC, Cameron CB. Tubicolous enteropneusts from the Cambrian period. Nature. 2013;495:503–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nanglu K, Caron J-B, Cameron CB. Using experimental decay of modern forms to reconstruct the early evolution and morphology of fossil enteropneusts. Paleobiology. 2015;41:460–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Walcott CD. Cambrian geology and paleontology. Middle Cambrian annelids. Smithson Misc Collect. 1911;57:107–44.Google Scholar
  13. Lohmann H. Oesia disjuncta Walcott, eine Appendicularie aus dem Kambrium. Mitteilungen aus dem Zool Staatsinstitut Zool Museum Hamburg. 1920;38:69–75.Google Scholar
  14. Szaniawski H. Cambrian chaetognaths recognized in Burgess Shale fossils. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2005;50:1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Szaniawski H. Fossil chaetognaths from the Burgess Shale: a reply to Conway Morris (2009). Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2009;54:361–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway Morris S. The Burgess Shale animal Oesia is not a chaetognath: a reply to Szaniawski (2005). Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2009;54:175–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Caron J-B, Gaines RR, Aria C, Mángano MG, Streng M. A new phyllopod bed-like assemblage from the Burgess Shale of the Canadian Rockies. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3210. Available from: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140211/ncomms4210/full/ncomms4210.html.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Conway Morris S, Robison RA. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. Univ Kansas Paleontol Contrib. 1988;122:1–48.Google Scholar
  19. Loduca ST, Wu M, Zhao Y, Schiffbauer JD, Leroy M, O'Neil E. Seaweed through time: the early Paleozoic. The Geological Society of America. 2015. Available from: https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2015AM/webprogram/Paper268008.html.
  20. Gaines RR, Droser ML. The paleoredox setting of Burgess Shale-type deposits. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2010;297:649–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Caron JB, Jackson DA. Paleoecology of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2008;258:222–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu SX, Zhu MY, Luo HL, Steiner M, Zhao FC, Li GX, Liu Q, Zhang ZF. The Guanshan biota. Kunming, China: Yunnan Science and Technology Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Ivantsov AY, Zhuravlev AY, Leguta AV, Krassilov VA, Melnikova LM, Ushatinskaya GT. Palaeoecology of the early Cambrian Sinsk biota from the Siberian platform. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2005;220:69–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang P, Bone Q, Carre C. Tunicate feeding filters. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2003;83:907–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ulrik H, Svane I. Filter feeding in lancelets (amphioxus), Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Invertebr Biol. 2015;118:423–32.Google Scholar
  26. Janvier P, Lund R. Hardistiella montanensis n. gen. et sp. (Petromyzontida) from the Lower Carboniferous of Montana, with remarks on the affinities of the lampreys. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1983;2:407–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cameron CB. The anatomy, life habits, and later development of a new species of enteropneust, Harrimania planktophilus (Hemichordata: Harrimaniidae) from Barkley Sound. Biol Bull. 2002;202:182–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gonzalez P, Cameron CB. The gill slits and pre-oral ciliary organ of Protoglossus (Hemichordata: Enteropneusta) are filter-feeding structures. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;98:898–906.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bates D, Kozlowska A, Loydell D, Urbanek A, Wade S. Ultrastructural observations on some dendroid and graptoloid graptolites and on Mastigograptus. Bull Geosciences. 2009;84:21–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mierzejewski P, Kulicki C. Cortical fibrils and secondary deposits in periderm of the hemichordate Rhabdopleura (Graptolithoidea). Acta Palaeont Pol. 2003;48:99–111.Google Scholar
  31. Gonzalez P, Cameron CB. Ultrastructure of the coenecium of Cephalodiscus (Hemichordata : Pterobranchia). Can J Zool. 2012;1269:1261–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Simakov O, Kawashima T, Marlétaz F, Jenkins J, Koyanagi R, Mitros T, et al. Hemichordate genomes and deuterostome origins. Nature. 2015;527:459–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Zamora S, Rahman IA. Deciphering the early evolution of echinoderms with Cambrian fossils. Palaeontology. 2014;57:1105–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Caron J-B, Conway Morris S, Shu D. Tentaculate fossils from the Cambrian of Canada (British Columbia) and China (Yunnan) interpreted as primitive deuterostomes. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9586. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009586.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith AB. Deuterostomes in a twist: The origins of a radical new body plan. Evol Dev. 2008;10:493–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ou Q, Conway Morris S, Han J, Zhang Z, Liu J, Chen A, et al. Evidence for gill slits and a pharynx in Cambrian vetulicolians: implications for the early evolution of deuterostomes. BMC Biol. 2012;10:81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-10-81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen A, Huang D. Gill rays of primitive vertebrate Yunnanozoon from Early Cambrian: A first record. Front Biol China. 2008;3:241–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Brien LJ, Caron J-B. Paleocommunity analysis of the Burgess Shale Tulip Beds, Mount Stephen, British Columbia: comparison with the Walcott Quarry and implications for community variation in the Burgess Shale. Paleobiology. 2016;42:27–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnston PA, Johnston KJ, Collom CJ, Powell WG, Pollock RJ. Palaeontology and depositional environments of ancient brine seeps in the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale at The Monarch, British Columbia, Canada. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2009;277:86–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Caron J-B, Gaines RR, Mángano MG, Streng M, Daley A. A new Burgess Shale-type assemblage from the “thin” Stephen Formation of the southern Canadian Rockies. Geology. 2010;9:811–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Walcott CD. Addenda to descriptions of Burgess Shale fossils. Smithson Misc Collect. 1931;85:1–46.Google Scholar
  42. Resser CE, Howell BF. Lower Cambrian Olenellus zone of the Appalachians. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1938;49:195–248.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Resser CE. Middle Cambrian fossils from Pend Oreille Lake, Idaho. Smithson Misc Collect. 1938;97:1–12.Google Scholar
  44. Waggoner B, Hagadorn JW. An unmineralized alga from the Lower Cambrian of California, USA. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol. 2004;231:67–83.Google Scholar
  45. Kimmig J, Pratt BR. Soft-bodied biota from the middle Cambrian (Drumian) Rockslide Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwestern Canada. J Paleo. 2015;89:51–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Krishtofovich AN. Discovery of Lycopodiaceae in the Cambrian deposits of eastern Siberia. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1953;91:1377. 1379.Google Scholar
  47. Hu SX, Zhu MY, Steiner M, Luo HL, Zhao FC, Liu Q. Biodiversity and taphonomy of the early Cambrian Guanshan biota, eastern Yunnan. Sci China Earth Sci. 2010;53:1765–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nanglu et al. 2016

Advertisement