Identification and characterization of Dlc1 isoforms in the mouse and study of the biological function of a single gene trapped isoform
© Sabbir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 December 2009
Accepted: 3 March 2010
Published: 3 March 2010
The Dlc1 (deleted in liver cancer 1) tumour suppressor gene codes for a RhoGTPase activating protein that is found inactivated in many tumour types. Several transcriptional isoforms have been described but the functional significance and tissue distribution of each form is presently poorly understood. Also, differences in the number of isoforms and splice variants reported still exist between different mammalian species. In order to better understand the number and function of the different variants of the Dlc1 gene in the mouse, we have carried out a detailed analysis. Extensive 3' RACE experiments were carried out in order to identify all possible Dlc1 isoforms and splice variants in the mouse. In addition, we have generated a gene trapped mouse that targets one of these isoforms in order to study its biological function. The effect of this gene trap insertion on the splicing of other isoforms has also been studied.
In addition to the known 6.1 and 6.2 Kb transcripts of Dlc1, our study revealed the existence of a novel 7.6 Kb transcriptional isoform in the mouse, which corresponds to the human 7.4 Kb (KIAA1723) cDNA transcript. A gene trapped embryonic cell line, with an insertion between Exon 1 and 2 of the 6.1 Kb transcriptional isoform, was used to generate a transgenic mouse. This line showed a significant reduction in the expression of the trapped isoform. However, reduced expression of the other isoforms was not seen. Mice heterozygous for the gene trapped allele were phenotypically normal, but homozygous mutant embryos did not survive beyond 10.5 days post coitum. Dlc1gt/gt embryos showed defects in the brain, heart, and placental blood vessels. Cultured serum-free mouse embryo cells from Dlc1 deficient embryos had elevated RhoA activity and displayed alterations in the organization of actin filaments and focal adhesions. The Dlc1 deficient cells also exhibited increased wound closure in an in vitro scratch assay.
The mouse has three major transcriptional isoforms of the Dlc1 gene that are differentially expressed in various tissues. A mouse with exon 1 of the 6.1 Kb transcript gt resulted in hypomorphic expression of Dlc1 protein and an embryonic lethal phenotype in the homozygous condition, which indicates that this isoform plays a major role in mouse development. The Dlc1 deficient cells showed altered cytoskeleton structure, increased RhoA activity and cellular migration.
The Rho family of GTPases control several important cellular processes, such as cell shape, motility, division and survival through a series of biochemical networks [1, 2]. RhoGTPases have long been implicated in tumourigenesis, as Rho activity is found to be increased in transformed cells and is necessary for the transformation by the Ras oncogene [3, 4]. The Rho proteins act as molecular switches, cycling between an active GTP bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state . The RhoGTPase activating proteins (RhoGAPs) down regulate Rho by stimulating its intrinsic GTPase activity . A significant number of RhoGAPs have been shown to have altered levels in a variety of human tumours and cell lines .
The deleted in liver cancer 1 (Dlc1) gene encodes a RhoGTPase activating protein (RhoGAP) that has been found to be inactivated by deletion or promoter methylation in many tumours, resulting in alterations in cellular proliferation, cytoskeleton reorganization and gene expression in tumour cells [8–15]. A recent study using representational oligonucleotide based microarray analysis showed that heterozygous deletion of Dlc1 occurred in ~50% of liver, breast and lung tumours and over 70% of colon cancers [10, 16].
The Dlc1 RhoGAP is a multi-domain protein that contains a sterile alpha motif 2 (SAM2) interaction domain and a StAR-related lipid-transfer (START) domain [2, 8, 17–20]. The Dlc1 gene shows multiple transcription start sites and alternative splicing. In humans, three major transcriptional isoforms of the Dlc1 gene has been reported (for a review see ). The predominant 6.3 Kb transcript of Dlc1 encodes a protein of 123 KDa . The existence of proteins for the human mRNA isoforms of 3.7 Kb (AK025544) and 7.4 Kb (KIAA1723) have recently been verified by Ko et al. . In mouse tissues, two principal transcripts of 6.5 and 5.5 Kb and a minor transcript of 7.6 Kb have been reported by Northern blotting , but the complete characterization and tissue specific expression of all the isoforms and splice variants of Dlc1 gene in the mouse has not yet been carried out.
In order to better understand the biological function of various isoforms of Dlc1, we have generated a mouse with one of its isoform variants targeted. We have also characterized the different transcriptional isoforms and their tissue specific expression in the mouse. The effect of this gene trap insertion on the other variants has also been studied.
Identification, characterization and tissue specific expression of mouse Dlc1 mRNAs and protein
Methylation status of the alternative promoters of Dlc1 6.1 and 6.2 Kb transcripts
Characterization of the mice heterozygous for the gene trap allele
Abnormalities in the Dlc1gt/gtembryos
Reduced level of Dlc1protein in a serum free Dlc1gt/gtmouse embryos cells
Dlc1gt/gtSFME cells showed increased RhoA activity and an altered cytoskeleton along with increased cell motility
It has been previously reported that active RhoA activity can down regulate p21WAF1 expression . The Dlc1gt/gt cells also showed significantly reduced (P < 0.001) constitutive levels of the p21WAF1 protein in comparison to the cell lines derived from heterozygous and wild type embryos (Figure 11). We have also found a positive correlation between reduced expression of Dlc1 and p21WAF1 in cell lines (R = 0.645; P = 0.004). The preceding results indicate that the Dlc1 gt cells showed increased RhoA activity.
Alternative splicing and promoter usage of genes allows for an expansion of protein diversity and control. Recent evidence suggests that 30%-50% of the human and mouse genes have multiple alternative promoters . In humans, at least three transcriptional isoforms (6.3, 3.7 and 7.4 Kb length) of Dlc1 gene have been identified that are expressed under the influence of three alternative promoters spanning approximately 400 Kb. The mouse Dlc1 gene on chromosome 8B1 and the human gene on 8P22 have an almost identical exon/intron structure, except for the presence of an extra codon in exon 5 of the mouse [22, 27]. In a previous study using 5' RACE and northern blotting analysis, Durkin et al. reported the presence of 3 Dlc1 transcripts in the mouse of 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5 Kb in length . However, in our study using extensive 3' RACE and northern blot analysis, we have found four major transcriptional isoforms of Dlc1 (2.1, 6.1, 6.2 and 7.6 Kb). The complete characterization of the 7.6 Kb and 2.1 Kb transcripts lead to the identification of a novel exon of 34 bp in length, which connects the Dlc1 gene upstream of exon 2 to an additional 1.7 Kb of exon sequences, resulting in the 7.6 Kb fusion transcript. The upstream 1.7 Kb exon sequences were generated from a previously uncharacterized gene 5' of Dlc-1 (A730069N07Rik). It is interesting to note that comparison of the mouse 7.6 Kb mRNA with the human 7.5 Kb transcript revealed that the 5th exon is exactly 34 bp in length and only differs in its relative position within the intronic sequences. The conserved nature of this novel exon sequence supports a functional significance for the 7.6 Kb mRNA. The human 7.4 Kb, KIA1723, cDNA has the potential to encode for a 1528 amino acid protein . Recently Ko et al. have shown high expression of a greater than 150 KD protein in the human heart tissue using an antibody based on this cDNA sequence . The putative promoter region of both the human and mouse Dlc1 7.6 Kb mRNA is approximately 400 Kb upstream of the exon 2 of the Dlc1 6.2 Kb transcript. Shorter transcripts originating from this promoter are also found, which do not encode Dlc1 RhoGAP related sequences. The existence of this larger Dlc1 polypeptide has not yet been verified in the mouse and we have not yet seen a protein of this size on our western blots. The mouse 2.1 Kb transcript retains only exon 2 and 3 of the regular Dlc1 transcripts and would not encode a RhoGAP related protein. Understanding the function of these shorter transcripts will have to await specific knockout mouse models. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the three isoforms reveals that these isoforms have a conserved domain structure and that they may be functionally redundant. However, these isoforms were not sufficient to rescue the embryonic lethal phenotype of our homozygous gt mice.
The gene fusions observed in the 7.6/2.1 Kb transcripts may be due to the bypassing of 3' end formation sites that has been observed for other genes in the Fantom database . Exon 4 of the A730069N07Rik transcript contains two successive polyadenylation signals TGTTTT and AATAAA, which are considered weak in comparison to the presence of three successive polyadenylation signals (AATAAA, ATTAAA, and TGTTTT)  present in the 14th exon of regular Dlc1 transcripts. The weak polyadenylation signal may be responsible for bypassing the 3' end formation and lead to the formation of a fusion transcript between the genes. However, the conserved nature of the exon 5 of the 7.6 transcript contradicts this finding and further study is necessary in order to validate these observations.
The 6.1 Kb Dlc1 transcript is predicted to encode a 123 KDa protein, which is highly expressed in the forebrain, anterior tip of the notochord, somites, liver, heart and placenta, suggesting an important role for this Dlc1 isoform in the development of theses organs. The 6.2 Kb alternative transcript contains a novel first exon located 133 Kb upstream of exon 2 and potentially codes for a 127 KDa protein. The first exon of the 6.2 Kb transcript substitutes 47 aa of the first 13 aa of the 6.1 Kb Dlc1 transcript. The existence of the 127 KDa Dlc1 protein has not yet been fully validated. However, in our western blots, using an antibody raised against a peptide to exon 5, we identified a band equivalent to 127 KDa. The expression level of 127 KDa Dlc1 protein showed tissue specific differences from the 123 KDa protein. For example, testes showed expression of the 127 KDa band and reduced levels of the 123 KDa band (Figures 3 and 4). There is possibility that the 127 KDa protein is a cross reacting non-specific protein. However, we argue that the 127 KDa band is the protein product of the 6.2 Kb isoform because of its molecular weight, which almost exactly matches the predicted protein product of 6.2 Kb isoform. Another reason for such an argument is that the 127 KDa protein band has increased intensity in the Dlc1gt/gt cell line as opposed to the wild type or heterozygous cell lines. This may be explained as a cellular response to complement the reduced level of 6.1 Kb transcript in the gt cells or an effect of the relative abundance of 6.2 kb isoform. The 6.1 and 6.2 Kb Dlc1 isoforms may be functionally redundant because of their structural resemblance and, thus, could complement each other. Recently, such functional redundancy has been shown by Ko et al. in a study using Myc tagged Dlc1 isoforms expressed in hepatoma cell lines . They showed that human Dlc1 isoforms α and β (equivalent to mouse isoforms 1 and 3) could suppress stress fibre formation in vitro. However, further experimentation is necessary in order to test such a claim.
The N terminus of Dlc1 protein contains a sterile alpha motif (SAM)2 interaction domain, amino acids 13-64 in the 6.1 Kb and 47-98 in the 6.2 Kb transcripts. The SAM domain is a motif that occurs in many transcription factors and signalling proteins . The 123 and 127 KDa Dlc1 proteins differ in exon 1, which is a short stretch of amino acids upstream of the SAM2 domain. Deletion of the SAM domain increases the velocity of cell migration but reduces directionality by acting as a negative regulator of Dlc1RhoGAP activity . A truncated version of Dlc1 protein that contains the N terminal domain, but not the GAP domain, localizes to focal adhesions and can act as a dominant negative protein . Recently, in hamster kidney cells, co-localization of Dlc1 protein with Caveolin-1 in focal adhesions was found to be independent of the SAM domain . However, the Dlc1 SAM2 domain has been shown to interact with the elongation factor EF1A1, targeting it to the membrane periphery and membrane ruffles .
It is possible that exon 1 of the Dlc1 isoforms may interact with different proteins or allow different subcellular localization for the spatial regulation of cell movement. In that case, the 6.1 Kb and 6.2 Kb isoforms may not be able to rescue each other's RhoGAP activity due to different interacting partners or subcellular localization. Alternatively, the two isoforms may have different temporal or tissue specific expression during development, a theory which is supported by our results. Experiments that will test these possibilities are ongoing.
The mean frequency of the promoter methylation for the Dlc1 isoforms helps to explain the tissue expression pattern. The promoter of the 6.1 Kb transcript showed a significantly lower mean percentage of CpG methylation (1%-19%) compared with the promoter of 6.2 Kb transcript (62%-65%). Hypermethylation of the Dlc1 promoter is a common mechanism for transcriptional repression of the Dlc1 gene in several human malignancies and hypermethylation of the 6.1 Kb transcript promoter is usually found in human tumours [9, 14].
The gene trap insertion occurred within intron 1 of the Dlc1 6.1 Kb transcript and this allowed us to examine the functional significance of the specific loss of this transcript. The gene trap vector inserted in the Dlc1 locus should delete the majority of the downstream coding sequences if obligatory cleavage and polyadenylation at the SV40 polyadenylation signal of the gene trap construct occurs. By multiplex PCR, we showed the existence of fusion transcripts for all three of the Dlc isoforms spliced to the βgeo coding region. However, only the 6.1 Kb transcript was significantly reduced, resulting in the hypomorphic expression of the 123 KDa protein and subsequent phenotypic abnormalities in the mouse. The hypomorphic expression was presumably due to low level splicing around the gene trap plasmid insert. There is a possibility that the phenotypic abnormalities in our study could be due to the disruption or deletion of a microRNA expressed from this intron . However, we have not found any evidence of any known microRNAs anywhere near or within this intron of Dlc1 in the miRBASE database, as well as any computationally identified candidate microRNA genes[36, 37]. Also, our gene trapped mouse phenocopies the Dlc1 exon 5 knockout mouse of Durkin et al. . These results suggest that the gt ES cell libraries maybe a useful resource for studying specific knockdown of transcriptional isoforms and splice variants of genes.
The Dlc1 gene plays a critical role in regulating cellular functions during early murine development. The abnormalities found in the Dlc1 gt embryos are a common occurrence in mouse gene knockouts that result in death at the early stages of embryogenesis, due to organ systems failure [38, 39] and are often associated with cardiac or placental defects . The abnormally enlarged heart, lack of yolk sac blood vessels and underdeveloped blood capillaries in the placental labyrinth of the homozygous Dlc1 gt embryos appeared at a developmental stage when the Dlc1 transcripts are normally expressed and, most probably, caused the embryonic lethality. Whether the heart and brain defects are a direct result of Dlc1 loss or a consequence of the lack of placental blood vessel formation will have to await the isolation of conditional Dlc1 knockout mice.
Previously, it has been shown that targeted disruption of mouse Rho associated coiled coil kinase-2 (ROCK-II) gene resulted in intrauterine growth retardation and defective branching morphogenesis of the placental labyrinth . The ROCK-II mRNA has been found to be expressed abundantly in placenta . The active form of RhoA binds to ROCK kinase, which phosphorylates myosin phosphatase, resulting in increased myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation allowing contraction . The Rho/ROCK signalling pathway also contributes to the Ca2+ sensitization of smooth muscle contraction . RhoA is abundantly expressed in vascular smooth muscle and its activation increases vascular tone, resulting in increased permeability . Rho GTPases has long been implicated in the regulation of endothelial permeability . Recently, it has been shown that increased expression of constitutively active RhoA induced cell rounding and apoptosis of endothelial cells . Therefore, it is possible that Dlc1 protein plays a significant role in placental and heart development due to its regulatory effect on Rho/ROCK signalling pathway.
The Dlc1 protein has been reported to be localized to the focal adhesions as shown by colocalization with the focal adhesion protein vinculin . Focal adhesions are a structural link between the actin cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix and are regions of signal transduction that can regulate growth control [47–49]. We have shown that the formation of actin stress fibres and vinculin rich focal adhesions were significantly increased in the hypomorphic Dlc1gt/gt SFME and fibroblast cell lines. Dlc1 has been implicated in the phosphoinositide and RhoGTPase signalling pathways, both of which can regulate stress fibre formation and focal adhesions assembly [50–52]. Similar findings have been reported by Holeiter et al. in breast cancer cells using siRNA mediated knockdown of Dlc1 transcripts  and Xue et al. in embryonic liver progenitor cells using shRNA . In contrast to our results, Durkin et al. reported that their knockout mice showed reduced actin stress fibre and vinculin rich focal adhesions in their Dlc1-/- mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells . A possible reason for this may be that the culturing of our SFME cells on fibronectin coated plates, may stimulate the Rho signalling allowing the formation of stress fibres. Using soluble GST-RBD in order to detect endogenous RhoGTP, we have been able to show that the Dlc1gt/gt cells exhibit increased RhoA activity and subcellular localization of active RhoA at the focal adhesions. Similar findings have been previously reported by Berdeaux et al. in nontransformed fibroblasts . Rho proteins are important regulators of cellular migration . In addition to the cytoskeletal changes, the Dlc1gt/gt MEF cells showed significantly increased cellular migration in wound closure assays compared with the heterozygous or wild type MEFs. Similarly, Holeiter et al. found rapid wound closure in scratch assays using RNAi to knockdown Dlc1 in MCF7 breast cancer cells . The cellular migration rate decreased as the cells approached to the midline of the wound from both sides, which might be because of changes in the direction of migration due to contact or the depletion of nutrients in the media. All of this evidence is consistent with the suggestion that Dlc1 deficiency may be a driving force for cellular migration by remodelling the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions.
Recently, it has been shown that in H-Ras oncogene transformed fibroblasts, RhoA may cooperate in transformation by suppressing the cell cycle inhibitor p21WAF1 that is induced by the sustained activation of the ERK-MAP kinase pathway [3, 25]. In our study, we saw increased RhoA activity and a reduced level of constitutive p21WAF1 expression in the Dlc1gt/gt SFME cells. The reduced expression of Dlc1 and p21WAF1 in the Dlc1 deficient cell lines was positively correlated. It is possible that activation of the Rho pathway through mutation of the Dlc RhoGAPs will complement the Ras oncogene in cell transformation in vivo.
We have found that the Dlc1 gene has four transcriptional isoforms expressed under the influence of three alternative promoters. The alternative promoters are differentially methylated in mouse tissues and this relates to the differential expression of the proteins in the tissues examined. We also identified a 127 KDa Dlc1 protein that may originate from the 6.2 Kb alternative transcript. We generated a Dlc1 gt mouse that resulted in hympomorphic expression of the 6.1 Kb transcript and the 123 KDa Dlc1 protein. The homozygous gt Dlc1gt/gt mouse embryos showed significant abnormalities in yolk sac and placental labyrinth vasculature suggesting an important developmental role for the 6.1 Kb isoform of Dlc1 during early embryonic development. A deficiency of this isoform resulted in increased GTP-Rho levels resulting in more stress fibre and vinculin associated focal adhesion formation. This in turn resulted in heightened cellular mobility.
Generation of Dlc1 mutantmice
An ES cell line (XE082) containing a gene trap insertion in the 1st intron of the Dlc1 locus (Figure 6A) was obtained from Bay Genomics (CA, USA). The gene trap plasmid pGT1Lxfcontains the Engrailed-2 (En2) splice acceptor sequence upstream of the β-geo reporter gene, followed by SV40 polyA sequence. XE082 ES cells were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts and the resulting chimeric mice were backcrossed to C57BL/6 to test for germ line transmission. One chimeric male mouse transmitted the Dlc1 gene trap allele through his germ line and was used in the subsequent studies.
We utilized an inverse PCR technique to localize the insertion site of gene trap vector (GenBank accession No: GS598775 (Figure 6A) . Genomic DNA was digested with MseI, circularized with T4 DNA ligase and PCR amplified with a pair of diverging primers (Figure 6A/i-ii). This amplicon was then sequenced and indicated that the plasmid had integrated into the intron 1 of Dlc1 gene (Figure 6B). Based on the integration information, we designed: (1) a primer in the neomycin-resistance cassette of pGT1Lxf(5'-GATTCCACCGCCGCCTTCTATG); and (2) two intronic primers encompassing the integration point (5'-GTGTAAGTTTGCCTCCTCCTTTGG and 5' TCCTGCTGGTGTGTGTAAACAGAC). These three primers, when used in multiplex PCR, amplify a 570 bp product specific for the targeted allele and a 388 bp band for the wild type gene (Figure
Histological analysis and X-gal staining of the mutant embryos
Embryos from heterozygous crosses were dissected at 10.5 and 11.5 dpc and yolk sacs were used for DNA extraction and subsequent genotyping. Placentae were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and sections were stained with H&E for microscopic examination. We isolated 10.5-11.5 dpc embryos from heterozygous crossings and they were fixed and stained as a whole mount in X gal as described .
SFME cell cultures
Embryos from heterozygous intercross matings were harvested on 9.5 dpc, cells were dissociated by trypsinization and cultured in serum-free conditions which consists of epidermal growth factor, transferrin, high density lipoprotein, insulin and fibronectin coated plates . Cells grow under these conditions do not senesce and have normal karyotypes. For MEF cultures, 9.5 dpc embryos were cultured in Alpha MEM (Gibco, Invitrogen, ON, Canada) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Cells were genotyped by PCR and studies were performed on wild type (Dlcwt/wt), heterozygous (Dlc1wt/gt) and homozygous (Dlc1gt/gt) cells prior to passage 10. All cell line specific experiments were repeated with multiple cell lines of each type obtained independently from different mouse litters.
Western blotting and Immunohistochemistry
SFME as well as MEFs cells were grown on 150 mm plates until confluent, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then lysed with radioimmunopreciptation assay buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) supplemented with 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (S8820, Sigma, MO, USA). After sonication for 3× 5 s on ice, the cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm in a Hettich-Mikro 20 centrifuge at 4°C. The protein concentration was estimated by Bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (BCA1 and B9643, Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Twenty micrograms of total protein was separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous (PVDF) membrane (IPVHO9120, Millipore Corp, MA, USA). The membrane was then blocked for 1 h in 5% skimmed milk powder in TBST buffer (20 mM tris, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1% tween) and hybridized with Dlc-1 antibody (Sc32931, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA; 1:500 dilution) over night. After washing in TBST buffer, the membrane was incubated with secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-Rabbit antibody (1:2000 dilution; #7074, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactivity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (RPN2132, GE Healthcare, NJ, USA). The membrane was then stripped with 0.1 M NaOH and blotted again with anti-Actin or GAPDH antibody (A2006, Sigma, 1:1000 dilution). The western blots were scanned using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager scanner and quantified by densitometry using ImageQuant software (version 1.2; both from Molecular Dynamics, Inc, CA, USA).
Subconfluent cultures of different cell types were plated on fibronectin coated glass coverslips and were incubated for 12 h in serum-free medium prior to fixation with 2% neutral buffered formalin. Staining of actin fibres with TRITC labelled phalloidin (P1951, Sigma) was performed according the manufacturers' protocol. Focal adhesions were visualized by direct immunofluorescence using monoclonal anti-Vinculin-FITC antibody (F7053, Sigma). The preparations were examined on Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc, ON, Canada) and an AxioCam HR charge-coupled device (Carl Zeiss). A 63×/1.4 oil objective lens (Carl Zeiss) was used at acquisition times of 200-300 ms for FITC (focal adhesions) 100-150 ms for TRITC (actin fibres), and 20 - 50 ms for DAPI (nuclei).
For stress fibre and focal adhesion quantification, six high resolution Z stacks images of phalloidin and antivinculin stained cells were taken at 1 μm intervals and projected as a single image after deconvolution using Axiovision 3.1 software (Zeiss). The deconvoluted flattened image was then analysed using ImageJ 1.38× public domain software. The stress fibre and focal adhesion frequency was calculated as described by Stachan et al. .
Rho activation and in situRho GTP affinity assay
Rho activity in wild type, heterozygous and homozygous cell lines were analysed using the active Rho-GTP pull down assay. A plasmid expressing GST-Rhotekin Rho-binding domain peptide (kindly provided by Dr Alan Hall, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, USA) was transformed into BL21 cells and expression was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1 thiogalactopyranoside for 2 h at 37°C. GST fusion proteins were purified on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Inc, Quebec, Canada).
SFME cells were grown in 150 mm dishes and were then deprived of growth factors for 12 h followed by addition of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA, 20 ng/mL) for 30 min. At the end of the treatment, cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and 500 μL of lysate buffer was added to each dish. Cells were scraped, and cell lysates were clarified at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Pull-down assays were performed according to Ren and Schwartz  with 30-40 μg of GST-fusion protein and 800-1500 μg of protein lysate per sample.
In situ detection of active Rho was performed as described by Berdeaux et al. [54, 61]. Cells growing on glass coverslips were briefly washed in PBS and immediately fixed with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 10 min at 4°C. After 30-min of incubation in PBS containing 3% BSA, 0.1 M glycine, and 0.05% Triton X-100 followed by incubation with the soluble GST-RBD (30 μg/ml) or GST (reduced) for 2 h at 4°C, the samples were washed three times and incubated with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody (1:1000 dilution) in wash buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The signal was detected by incubation with FITC conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000 dilution) for 45 min at room temperature. Samples were mounted in antifade reagent containing DAPI.
RNA isolation and cDNA preparation
RNA was isolated from different tissues of C57BL/6J mouse, as well as SFME cell lines using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Inc, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (5 μg) was reversed transcribed using SuperScript II Reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random hexamers (Invitrogen).
3'rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) analysis
List of primers used for 3'RACE, real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, genotyping, and northern probe preparation. All primer sequences are in 5'-3' direction.
Primers for 3'RACE
1st strand CDNA synthesis
1st round PCR
2nd round PCR
& different forward primers
Primers for Northern probe
1st round PCR
2nd round PCR
Primers for real time quantification of splice variants
7.6 Kb transcript
6.2 Kb transcript
6.1 Kb transcript
2.1 Kb transcript
TTC CGT GTT CCT ACC CCC AAT GTGT
Primers for methylation study
6.1 Kb Transcript
6.2 Kb transcript
Multiplex PCR primers for genotyping Dlc1 gene trap embryos
Multiplex PCR primers for fusion transcripts
6.2 Kb transcript
6.1 Kb transcript
All 3'RACE reactions were electrophoresed through 1.5% agarose gels and visualized. 3'RACE products were excised from the agarose gel, purified using Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc, ON, Canada) and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy Vector Systems (Promega Fisher Scientific, ON, Canada) using the manufacturer's instructions.
After cloning 3'RACE products, both strands of DNA were sequenced for each construct. Sequencing was performed by the DNA Sequencing facility at Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology using BIG DYE terminators from Applied Biosystems, Inc (PE Applied Biosystems, ON, Canada) and sequencing reactions were run on ABI 310 DNA Sequencer.
Northern blot analysis of DLC-1 mRNA
Poly(A)+ RNA was prepared from different tissues of C57BL/6J mice and SFME cell lines using mRNA isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Quebec, Canada) and analysed by Northern blot hybridization using 2.2% (w/v) acrylamide-0.5% (w/v) agarose gel . The blot was probed with a 32P-labelled 3.3 Kb RNA probe generated from Dlc1 6.1 Kb isoform. The 3.3 Kb probe was generated by nested PCR primers (Table 1) and cloned into the Xho1 restriction site of Litmas28i vector (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) containing T7 promoter on both sides. The vector was linearized and the radiolabelled antisense RNA probe was generated using T7 polymerase.
Quantification of Dlc1 isoforms by real time and multiplex PCR
The relative expression of the different transcriptional variants was determined by quantitative real time and multiplex RT-PCR. Three forward primers were designed, one primer each from the exon 1 of 6.1 and 6.2 Kb transcripts and the third primer designed from the exon 4 of 7.6 Kb transcript, which is also common to 2.1 Kb transcript. The 6.1 and 6.2 Kb transcript specific forward primers were combined with a reverse primer designed from exon 2 and the 7.6 Kb transcript specific forward primer was combined with a reverse primer specific to exon 4 of 6.1 Kb transcript, respectively. PCR primers were designed using the Gene Fisher-version 2 software (Bielefeld University Bioinformatics Service, Bielefeld, Germany) for quantification of the various isoform variants (listed in Table 1). Absolute quantification of the transcripts was performed in an iCyclerIQ (Biorad, ON, Canada). Each reaction mix contained SYBR Green (Sigma S9430), Fluorescein calibration dye (Biorad, 170-8780) and 200 nM of each primer, 200 nM dNTP solutions, 1 × Reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 U Taq polymerase. The thermal cycling conditions were: 95°C for 1 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 62°-65°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. In order to determine the absolute copy number of target transcripts, Dlc1 isoforms (6.1, 6.2 and 7.6 Kb) and GAPDH cDNAs were amplified using specific primer sets as described in Table 1. The purified PCR products were cloned in pGEM-T easy vector system and the plasmid DNA was used to generate calibration curves, which also permitted evaluation of PCR efficiencies using the formula E = 10[-1/slope]. The efficiency of amplification was checked for all targets by performing a series of serial dilutions of template for each primer pair in triplicate. Real time PCR data quality control calculations were run on the SAS program as described [64, 65]. The E value varied from -2.05 to -3.4 which represents an acceptable PCR efficiency between 90%-95% . Quantitative RT- PCRs were then conducted for different mouse tissue samples, and the specificity of each amplified product was confirmed by the melting curve analysis (Figure 3A). Results were expressed as copy number of specific isoforms per 1000 copies of GAPDH cDNA (Figure 3B).
For multiplex PCR, we used two different strategies. First, the different isoforms were quantified relative to GAPDH internal standard and second, all the splice variants were quantified to the corresponding fusion transcript that was generated by fusion to the βgeo gene, which is part of the gene trap insertion. Relative expression of cDNA equivalent of 400 ng total RNA was quantified using two sets of primers in the same PCR reaction; one set specific to the Dlc1 isoform and the other set specific to either the GAPDH gene or to the βgeo fusion cDNA. The PCR products were run in a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization.
In vitroscratch assay
Cell migration rates of wild type, heterozygous and homozygous cell lines were compared by an in vitro scratch assay . Prior to the migration experiments, 60 mm cell culture plates were incubated for 4 h with 10 mg/mL fibronectin in Alpha-MEM. Coated dishes were blocked with 3 mL of 2 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at 37°C. Then, excess fibronectin was removed by washing with PBS and dishes were refilled with 3-5 mL of media before plating the cells. The wild type, heterozygous and homozygous fibroblast batches were seeded onto the fibronectin coated plates and cultured until confluent. After reaching confluency, the cell monolayer was scratched with a p200 pipette tip in two diagonal lines. The cell debris was removed and the edge of the scratch was smoothened by washing the cells once with 1 mL of the growth medium and then replaced with 5 mL of medium and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. In order to obtain the same field during the image acquisition, reference points were created by marking the underneath of the dish with a fine pointed marker using a stereo-microscope. Subsequent photographs of the scratches were taken at 0, 6 and 18 h time intervals using a phase contrast microscope. We quantified the cell migration rate by determining the total area that the MEF cells moved from the edge of the scratch toward the center of the scratch during 0-6 h and 6-18 h of incubation following the creation of the wound in terms of pixels calculated manually using the Image J 1.38× public domain software (available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Methylation study of the Dlc1 promoter region
Chromosomal DNA was isolated from different mouse tissues by standard phenol chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation . Five micrograms of genomic DNA was then treated with bisulphite reagent for conversion of unmethylated cytosines of genomic DNA to uracils as previously described . An aliquot of converted DNA (~100-300 ng) was used for amplification of the promoters of the Dlc1 6.1 and 6.2 Kb transcripts. The PCR primers were designed from the regions of the promoter that do not harbour any CpG dinucleotides (Table 1, Figure 5A). Primers were designed using PSQ Assay design software version 1.0.6 (Biotage) and one of the primer was biotinylated to generate single stranded DNA which was then sequenced using specific sequencing primers and the Pyromark gold reagent (5× 96 PSQ 96 MA) in Biotage Pyromark Q96 MD machine. The methylation pattern was analysed using PyroQ-CpG software version 1.0.0.
The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare three different cell lines with respect to the mean of Dlc1 protein expression, P21WAF1 protein expression, focal adhesion frequency, stress fibre frequency and the cell migration rate. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the effect of LPA on active Rho induction in three different cell lines compared to controls. Correlation between Dlc1 and P21WAF1 protein expression was analysed using Pearson correlation test. All the statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Stat 7 for Windows software, version 2.03, 1997, SPSS Inc, IL, USA. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
deleted in liver cancer
days post coitum
haematoxylin and eosin
mouse embryonic fibroblast
polymerase chain reaction
red blood cells
rho-associated coiled coil forming kinase
reverse transcription PCR
sterile alpha motif
sodium dodecyl sulphate
serum-free mouse embryo
StAR-related liquid transfer.
This study was supported with grants from the CancerCare Manitoba Foundation (MM, GGH); Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (MM, GGH) and Genome Canada (GGH). We also thank Heather Prieditis for her excellent care of the animals, Dr Alan Hall for plasmids and Dr Luke DeLange for his encouragement and support.
- Ellenbroek SI, Collard JG: Rho GTPases: functions and association with cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2007, 24: 657-672. 10.1007/s10585-007-9119-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moon SY, Zheng Y: Rho GTPase-activating proteins in cell regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13: 13-22. 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)00004-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahai E, Olson MF, Marshall CJ: Cross-talk between Ras and Rho signalling pathways in transformation favours proliferation and increased motility. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 755-766. 10.1093/emboj/20.4.755.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zohn IM, Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, Rossman KL, Der CJ: Rho family proteins and Ras transformation: the RHOad less traveled gets congested. Oncogene. 1998, 17: 1415-1438. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaffe AB, Hall A: Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 21: 247-269. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernards A: GAPs galore! A survey of putative Ras superfamily GTPase activating proteins in man and Drosophila. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1603: 47-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandpal RP: Rho GTPase activating proteins in cancer phenotypes. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2006, 7: 355-365. 10.2174/138920306778018025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Healy KD, Hodgson L, Kim TY, Shutes A, Maddileti S, Juliano RL, Hahn KM, Harden TK, Bang YJ, Der CJ: DLC-1 suppresses non-small cell lung cancer growth and invasion by RhoGAP-dependent and independent mechanisms. Mol Carcinog. 2008, 47: 326-337. 10.1002/mc.20389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong CM, Lee JM, Ching YP, Jin DY, Ng IO: Genetic and epigenetic alterations of DLC-1 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 7646-7651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xue W, Krasnitz A, Lucito R, Sordella R, Vanaelst L, Cordon-Cardo C, Singer S, Kuehnel F, Wigler M, Powers S, Zender L, Lowe SW: DLC1 is a chromosome 8p tumor suppressor whose loss promotes hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 1439-1444. 10.1101/gad.1672608.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan BZ, Miller MJ, Keck CL, Zimonjic DB, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of a gene frequently deleted in human liver cancer (DLC-1) homologous to rat RhoGAP. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 2196-2199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ng IO, Liang ZD, Cao L, Lee TK: DLC-1 is deleted in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and exerts inhibitory effects on the proliferation of hepatoma cell lines with deleted DLC-1. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 6581-6584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan BZ, Durkin ME, Popescu NC: Promoter hypermethylation of DLC-1, a candidate tumor suppressor gene, in several common human cancers. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003, 140: 113-117. 10.1016/S0165-4608(02)00674-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan BZ, Jefferson AM, Baldwin KT, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC, Reynolds SH: DLC-1 operates as a tumor suppressor gene in human non-small cell lung carcinomas. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1405-1411. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: Restoration of DLC-1 gene expression induces apoptosis and inhibits both cell growth and tumorigenicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1308-1313. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucito R, Healy J, Alexander J, Reiner A, Esposito D, Chi M, Rodgers L, Brady A, Sebat J, Troge J, West JA, Rostan S, Nguyen KC, Powers S, Ye KQ, Olshen A, Venkatraman E, Norton L, Wigler M: Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: a high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2291-2305. 10.1101/gr.1349003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Homma Y, Emori Y: A dual functional signal mediator showing RhoGAP and phospholipase C-delta stimulating activities. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 286-291.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ponting CP, Aravind L: START: a lipid-binding domain in StAR, HD-ZIP and signalling proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999, 24: 130-132. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01362-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qiao F, Bowie JU: The many faces of SAM. Sci STKE. 2005, 2005: re7-10.1126/stke.2862005re7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durkin ME, Yuan BZ, Zhou X, Zimonjic DB, Lowy DR, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: DLC-1:a Rho GTPase-activating protein and tumour suppressor. J Cell Mol Med. 2007, 11: 1185-1207. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00098.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ko FC, Yeung YS, Wong CM, Chan LK, Poon RT, Ng IO, Yam JW: Deleted in liver cancer 1 isoforms are distinctly expressed in human tissues, functionally different and under differential transcriptional regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2010, 30: 139-148. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02133.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durkin ME, Yuan BZ, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: Gene structure, tissue expression, and linkage mapping of the mouse DLC-1 gene (Arhgap7). Gene. 2002, 288: 119-127. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00462-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chellaiah MA, Soga N, Swanson S, McAllister S, Alvarez U, Wang D, Dowdy SF, Hruska KA: Rho-A is critical for osteoclast podosome organization, motility, and bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 11993-12002. 10.1074/jbc.275.16.11993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burns S, Thrasher AJ, Blundell MP, Machesky L, Jones GE: Configuration of human dendritic cell cytoskeleton by Rho GTPases, the WAS protein, and differentiation. Blood. 2001, 98: 1142-1149. 10.1182/blood.V98.4.1142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olson MF, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ: Signals from Ras and Rho GTPases interact to regulate expression of p21Waf1/Cip1. Nature. 1998, 394: 295-299. 10.1038/28425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davuluri RV, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Plass C, Huang TH: The functional consequences of alternative promoter use in mammalian genomes. Trends Genet. 2008, 24: 167-177. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.01.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan BZ, Yang Y, Keck-Waggoner CL, Zimonjic DB, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: Assignment and cloning of mouse Arhgap7 to chromosome 8A4-B2, a conserved syntenic region of human chromosome 8p22-->p21. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999, 87: 189-190. 10.1159/000015462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagase T, Kikuno R, Hattori A, Kondo Y, Okumura K, Ohara O: Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XIX. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res. 2000, 7: 347-355. 10.1093/dnares/7.6.347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, Gough J, Frith MC, Maeda N, et al: The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005, 309: 1559-1563. 10.1126/science.1112014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frith MC, Carninci P, Kai C, Kawai J, Bailey TL, Hayashizaki Y, Mattick JS: Splicing bypasses 3' end formation signals to allow complex gene architectures. Gene. 2007, 403: 188-193. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim TY, Healy KD, Der CJ, Sciaky N, Bang YJ, Juliano RL: Effects of structure of Rho GTPase-activating protein DLC-1 on cell morphology and migration. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 32762-32770. 10.1074/jbc.M800617200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim TY, Vigil D, Der CJ, Juliano RL: Role of DLC-1, a tumor suppressor protein with RhoGAP activity, in regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell motility. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009, 28: 77-83. 10.1007/s10555-008-9167-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaga M, Sekimata M, Fujii M, Kawai K, Kamata H, Hirata H, Homma Y, Yagisawa H: A PLCdelta1-binding protein, p122/RhoGAP, is localized in caveolin-enriched membrane domains and regulates caveolin internalization. Genes Cells. 2004, 9: 25-37. 10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00698.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhong D, Zhang J, Yang S, Soh UJ, Buschdorf JP, Zhou YT, Yang D, Low BC: The SAM domain of the RhoGAP DLC1 binds EF1A1 to regulate cell migration. J Cell Sci. 2009, 122: 414-424. 10.1242/jcs.027482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osokine I, Hsu R, Loeb GB, McManus MT: Unintentional miRNA ablation is a risk factor in gene knockout studies: a short report. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4: e34-10.1371/journal.pgen.0040034.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berezikov E, Guryev V, van de BJ, Wienholds E, Plasterk RH, Cuppen E: Phylogenetic shadowing and computational identification of human microRNA genes. Cell. 2005, 120: 21-24. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nord AS, Chang PJ, Conklin BR, Cox AV, Harper CA, Hicks GG, Huang CC, Johns SJ, Kawamoto M, Liu S, Meng EC, Morris JH, Rossant J, Ruiz P, Skarnes WC, Soriano P, Stanford WL, Stryke D, von Melchner H, Wurst W, Yamamura K, Young SG, Babbitt PC, Ferrin TE: The International Gene Trap Consortium Website: a portal to all publicly available gene trap cell lines in mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D642-D648. 10.1093/nar/gkj097.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durkin ME, Avner MR, Huh CG, Yuan BZ, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC: DLC-1, a Rho GTPase-activating protein with tumor suppressor function, is essential for embryonic development. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579: 1191-1196. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris MJ, Juriloff DM: Mini-review: toward understanding mechanisms of genetic neural tube defects in mice. Teratology. 1999, 60: 292-305. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199911)60:5<292::AID-TERA10>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thumkeo D, Keel J, Ishizaki T, Hirose M, Nonomura K, Oshima H, Taketo MM, Narumiya S: Targeted disruption of the mouse rho-associated kinase 2 gene results in intrauterine growth retardation and fetal death. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 5043-5055. 10.1128/MCB.23.14.5043-5055.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimizu Y, Dobashi K, Iizuka K, Horie T, Suzuki K, Tukagoshi H, Nakazawa T, Nakazato Y, Mori M: Contribution of small GTPase Rho and its target protein rock in a murine model of lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 163: 210-217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV: Ca2+ sensitivity of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II: modulated by G proteins, kinases, and myosin phosphatase. Physiol Rev. 2003, 83: 1325-1358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Hinsbergh V, van Nieuw AG: Intracellular signalling involved in modulating human endothelial barrier function. J Anat. 2002, 200: 525-10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00060.x.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wojciak-Stothard B, Ridley AJ: Rho GTPases and the regulation of endothelial permeability. Vascul Pharmacol. 2002, 39: 187-199. 10.1016/S1537-1891(03)00008-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayless KJ, Davis GE: Microtubule depolymerization rapidly collapses capillary tube networks in vitro and angiogenic vessels in vivo through the small GTPase Rho. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 11686-11695. 10.1074/jbc.M308373200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawai K, Yamaga M, Iwamae Y, Kiyota M, Kamata H, Hirata H, Homma Y, Yagisawa H: A PLCdelta1-binding protein, p122RhoGAP, is localized in focal adhesions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004, 32: 1107-1109. 10.1042/BST0321107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M: Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996, 12: 463-518. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeMali KA, Wennerberg K, Burridge K: Integrin signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003, 15: 572-582. 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00109-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petit V, Thiery JP: Focal adhesions: structure and dynamics. Biol Cell. 2000, 92: 477-494. 10.1016/S0248-4900(00)01101-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boettner B, Van Aelst L: The role of Rho GTPases in disease development. Gene. 2002, 286: 155-174. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00426-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sekimata M, Kabuyama Y, Emori Y, Homma Y: Morphological changes and detachment of adherent cells induced by p122, a GTPase-activating protein for Rho. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 17757-17762. 10.1074/jbc.274.25.17757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toker A: The synthesis and cellular roles of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998, 10: 254-261. 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80148-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holeiter G, Heering J, Erlmann P, Schmid S, Jahne R, Olayioye MA: Deleted in liver cancer 1 controls cell migration through a Dia1-dependent signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 8743-8751. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berdeaux RL, Diaz B, Kim L, Martin GS: Active Rho is localized to podosomes induced by oncogenic Src and is required for their assembly and function. J Cell Biol. 2004, 166: 317-323. 10.1083/jcb.200312168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hall A: Signal transduction through small GTPases--a tale of two GAPs. Cell. 1992, 69: 389-391. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90441-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ochman H, Gerber AS, Hartl DL: Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics. 1988, 120: 621-623.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Elizabeth L: Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. 1994, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2Google Scholar
- Loo DT, Fuquay JI, Rawson CL, Barnes DW: Extended culture of mouse embryo cells without senescence: inhibition by serum. Science. 1987, 236: 200-202. 10.1126/science.3494308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strachan LR, Condic ML: Neural crest motility and integrin regulation are distinct in cranial and trunk populations. Dev Biol. 2003, 259: 288-302. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00187-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ren XD, Kiosses WB, Schwartz MA: Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 578-585. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.578.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherman LS, Atit R, Rosenbaum T, Cox AD, Ratner N: Single cell Ras-GTP analysis reveals altered Ras activity in a subpopulation of neurofibroma Schwann cells but not fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 30740-30745. 10.1074/jbc.M001702200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scotto-Lavino E, Du G, Frohman MA: 3' end cDNA amplification using classic RACE. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 2742-2745. 10.1038/nprot.2006.481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sebo TJ, Schmit JC: Analytical gel electrophoresis of high-molecular-weight RNA in acrylamide-agarose gels containing methylmercuric hydroxide. Anal Biochem. 1982, 120: 136-145. 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90328-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN: Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006, 7: 85-10.1186/1471-2105-7-85.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL: In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2: 329-333. 10.1038/nprot.2007.30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghoshal K, Majumder S, Jacob ST: Analysis of promoter methylation and its role in silencing metallothionein I gene expression in tumor cells. Methods Enzymol. 2002, 353: 476-486. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.