Table 1 Summary of I-TASSER modeling on benchmark I in comparison with atomic ROSETTA [13]
From: Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations
|  |  |  | Cα-RMSD (Å) of ROSETTA models | Cα-RMSD (Å) (TM-score) of I-TASSER models | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein name | Length (residues) | Secondary structure | Round 1 | Round 2 | Best in top five clusters | First cluster | Best in top five clusters |
1b72A | 49 | α | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 3.3 (0.64) | 3.1 (0.64) |
1shfA | 59 | β | 11.1 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 1.7 (0.75) | 1.7 (0.75) |
1tif_ | 59 | αβ | 5.3 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 7.0 (0.33) | 7.0 (0.36) |
2reb_2 | 60 | αβ | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 5.6 (0.37) | 4.7 (0.57) |
1r69_ | 61 | α | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 (0.75) | 1.9 (0.75) |
1csp_ | 67 | β | 5.1 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 2.1 (0.76) | 2.1 (0.76) |
1di2A_ | 69 | αβ | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.3 (0.78) | 2.3 (0.78) |
1n0uA4 | 69 | αβ | 9.9 | 10.2 | 2.7 | 4.4 (0.48) | 4.4 (0.48) |
1mla_2 | 70 | αβ | 8.4 | 8.7 | 7.2 | 2.8 (0.66) | 2.7 (0.66) |
1af7__ | 72 | α | 10.1 | 10.4 | 1.7 | 4.2 (0.49) | 4.2 (0.49) |
1ogwA_ | 72 | αβ | 2.7 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 1.1 (0.88) | 1.1 (0.88) |
1dcjA_ | 73 | αβ | 3.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 10.5 (0.39) | 10.0 (0.39) |
1dtjA_ | 74 | αβ | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.9 (0.80) | 1.7 (0.82) |
1o2fB_ | 77 | αβ | 10.1 | N/A | 10.3 | 7.1 (0.41) | 5.2 (0.43) |
1mkyA3 | 81 | αβ | 3.2 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 5.2 (0.40) | 4.5 (0.50) |
1tig_ | 88 | αβ | 4.1 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 7.7 (0.50) | 4.4 (0.54) |
Average | 69 | Â | 5.1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.3 (0.59) | 3.8 (0.61) |