Skip to main content
Fig. 12 | BMC Biology

Fig. 12

From: A novel small molecule, AS1, reverses the negative hedonic valence of noxious stimuli

Fig. 12

The D2 receptor agonist sumanirole maleate does not replicate or reverse the effects of AS1 in multiple assays. A Temperature choice assay (28.5 °C vs 37.5 °C) with various concentrations of sumanirole. All AS1-treated fish significantly preferred the 37.5 °C side regardless of sumanirole concentration, whereas fish treated only with sumanirole or vehicle solution significantly chose the 28.5 °C side. N = 44 fish for DMSO, 41 for 1 μM sumanirole, 59 for 5 μM sumanirole, 44 for 10 μM sumanirole, 48 for 30 μM sumanirole, 28 for 5 μM AS1, 46 for 1 μM sumanirole + 5 μM AS1, 50 for 5 μM sumanirole + 5 μM AS1, 37 for 10 μM sumanirole + 5 μM AS1, and 53 for 30 μM sumanirole + 5 μM AS1. B Velocity data for fish in the experiment shown in A. AS1 treatment significantly increases swimming velocity in the 28.5 °C zone and decreases swimming velocity in the 37.5 °C zone, regardless of the concentration of sumanirole co-applied to the zebrafish. Sumanirole alone has no effect upon swimming velocity in either zone. * denotes significant differences in swimming velocities between the 28.5 and 37.5 °C zones for the same group of fish, + denotes significant difference from the 0 μM AS1 37.5 °C swimming velocity, and # denotes significant difference from the 0 μM AS1 28.5 °C swimming velocity. C, D AITC aversion assay. Sumanirole alone does not affect aversion to this noxious chemical stimulus, but at higher concentrations partially attenuates AS1-induced attraction to AITC. N = 68 for 0 μM sumanirole, 36 for 1 μM sumanirole, 36 for 5 μM sumanirole, 61 for 10 μM sumanirole, 63 for 30 μM sumanirole, 64 for 0 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, 34 for 1 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, 34 for 5 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, 61 for 10 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, and 63 for 30 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1. * represent the significant difference of experimental traces from the DMSO-treated control fish at each indicated time point. # represent the significant difference of experimental traces compared to AS1-only control fish at the indicated time points. E Distance of each individual larva from the AITC stimulus at the final time point (840 s) from the experiment shown in C, D. * presented directly over columns represent the significant difference between the DMSO-only control condition, and between other columns when indicated by lines. F Phototaxis assay. AS1-treated fish significantly chose the dark half of the arena regardless of what concentration of sumanirole was co-applied, whereas vehicle and sumanirole-only treated fish significantly chose the light half of the arena. N = 23 fish for 0 μM sumanirole, 37 for 1 μM sumanirole, 41 for 5 μM sumanirole, 40 for 10 μM sumanirole, 40 for 0 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, 46 for 1 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, 43 for 5 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1, and 40 for 10 μM sumanirole + 2.5 μM AS1. */#/+ p < 0.05, **/##/++ p < 0.01, ***/###/+++ p < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test used in A, B. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test used in C, D, F. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test used in E. For all temperature and light/dark choice experiments, a one-sample t test was performed with a hypothetical mean of 50% to determine if fish were significantly choosing one side of the arena over the other

Back to article page