Evidence for gill slits and a pharynx in Cambrian vetulicolians: implications for the early evolution of deuterostomes
© Ou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 June 2012
Accepted: 2 October 2012
Published: 2 October 2012
Vetulicolians are a group of Cambrian metazoans whose distinctive bodyplan continues to present a major phylogenetic challenge. Thus, we see vetulicolians assigned to groups as disparate as deuterostomes and ecdysozoans. This divergence of opinions revolves around a strikingly arthropod-like body, but one that also bears complex lateral structures on its anterior section interpreted as pharyngeal openings. Establishing the homology of these structures is central to resolving where vetulicolians sit in metazoan phylogeny.
New material from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte helps to resolve this issue. Here, we demonstrate that these controversial structures comprise grooves with a series of openings. The latter are oval in shape and associated with a complex anatomy consistent with control of their opening and closure. Remains of what we interpret to be a musculature, combined with the capacity for the grooves to contract, indicate vetulicolians possessed a pumping mechanism that could process considerable volumes of seawater. Our observations suggest that food captured in the anterior cavity was transported to dorsal and ventral gutters, which then channeled material to the intestine. This arrangement appears to find no counterpart in any known fossil or extant arthropod (or any other ecdysozoan). Anterior lateral perforations, however, are diagnostic of deuterostomes.
If the evidence is against vetulicolians belonging to one or other group of ecdysozoan, then two phylogenetic options seem to remain. The first is that such features as vetulicolians possess are indicative of either a position among the bilaterians or deuterostomes but apart from the observation that they themselves form a distinctive and recognizable clade current evidence can permit no greater precision as to their phylogenetic placement. We argue that this is too pessimistic a view, and conclude that evidence points towards vetulicolians being members of the stem-group deuterostomes; a group best known as the chordates (amphioxus, tunicates, vertebrates), but also including the ambulacrarians (echinoderms, hemichordates), and xenoturbellids. If the latter, first they demonstrate that these members of the stem group show few similarities to the descendant crown group representatives. Second, of the key innovations that underpinned deuterostome success, the earliest and arguably most seminal was the evolution of openings that define the pharyngeal gill slits of hemichordates (and some extinct echinoderms) and chordates.
Molecular data [1, 2] have radically reconfigured many aspects of metazoan phylogeny, and in doing so have effected a renaissance in this area of evolutionary biology that has uncovered many hitherto unsuspected relationships. An unavoidable drawback, however, is that typically the extant forms are highly derived and disparate with the result that the natures of common ancestors are often matters for unconstrained speculation. In principle, however, by providing direct access to members of stem groups of particular phyla (or other major clades), the fossil record can provide insights into the early divergence of major groups and hence the construction of their respective bodyplans . In reality the available fossil record remains problematic, because although in many cases stem-group representatives have proved of great value in documenting the nature of transitional forms, in the Cambrian there is a plethora of seemingly enigmatic taxa. Interpretations of such taxa can be so disparate that it is sometimes questioned whether what is known of these fossils makes them capable of serving any useful phylogenetic role [4, 5]. A key area of dissent is the recognition of homologous structures. This, combined with often apparently bizarre combinations of character states, has generated controversy rather than consensus. Despite being widespread and often showing excellent soft-bodied preservation, the enigmatic vetulicolians [6–13] exemplify this difficulty.
This group is united by a distinctive bodyplan. This consists of a prominent anterior unit, ranging from oval to quadrate in shape, and possessing a wide oral opening. Attached to this unit is a segmented tail with a terminal anus. Despite a strikingly arthropod-like arrangement, none of the known taxa (including Vetulicola , Ooedigera , Pomatrum , Xidazoon , Didazoon , Beidazoon , Yuyuanozoon , and Banffia ) has yielded evidence of either molting or convincing remains of cephalic structures and/or jointed limbs. Nevertheless, vetulicolians continue to be compared to ecdysozoans  as far flung as the lobopodians , arthropods [6, 10, 21], and kinorhynchs [7, 22, 23]. A radical alternative has been to assign them to the deuterostomes, as either members of a stem group [13, 16, 17, 24] or some sort of tunicate [18, 25, 26]. The crux of the problem revolves around the nature of prominent lateral structures, but to date there is neither agreement as to their original configuration nor function. Identifications range from midgut glands  to respiratory organs, but in the latter case interpretations are as disparate as a direct comparison to crustacean branchial chambers [12, 20, 21, 28] as against pharyngeal gill slits [13, 16, 17, 24]. Resolution of this divergence of interpretations would be possible if exquisitely preserved material were available that would allow not only a complete anatomical description but one that can be combined with a plausible functional analysis. Here, we demonstrate that the lateral structures of Vetulicola form an integrated complex and we present evidence for what we interpret to be a series of five unequivocal openings. We further propose that these served to expel seawater from the interior, which previously had been filtered so as to convey food first to dorsal and ventral gutters and ultimately to the posterior gut.
Functional morphology of gill slits in Vetulicola
Material of Vetulicola is abundant, but relatively few specimens are sufficiently well preserved and/or orientated so as to reveal all the necessary details. Importantly the anterior unit is usually filled with sediment, which appears to have been introduced post mortem. This, combined with the fact that it can be removed by mechanical preparation, means that in addition to the customary external views, details of the inner configurations are also available. Any interpretation, therefore, depends crucially on the relative orientation and taphonomy of individual specimens. Viewed from the exterior the anterior region of Vetulicola consists of effectively four plate-like units that are covered by a thin membrane. These plates meet along both the dorsal and ventral midlines, but are laterally separated by prominent grooves that extend the entire length on either side. The margins of both grooves are darker in color. We suggest the darker color represents somewhat thicker material that would have served as reinforcement. This feature is most notable at the five semicircular regions (the lappets). Both margins of the groove form an overhang. Below we review evidence that these grooves could expand and it seems likely that this recessed area was composed of more delicate tissue. At both ends of the anterior unit the groove tapers to a fine termination, but the intervening length shows various complexities on both the outer and inner surfaces. Below, we justify why we believe that this region houses perforations that link the interior of the animal to the exterior, and then go on to argue that these are homologous to the canonical pharyngeal gill slits of deuterostomes. We are mindful that observation and interpretation (functional and phylogenetic) need to be kept separate, and thus at this stage reference to gill slits should be taken as a descriptive shorthand.
In specimens where the grooves remain filled with sediment the openings are apparently isolated, but in this aspect they provide details of the region from which the water exited. Typically the lappets obscure the upper and lower margins, but when removed by mechanical preparation the actual apertures (typically these are filled with sediment) have an oval outline. The margin that defines the aperture is irregular and bluntly dentate, while the surrounding area consists of two distinct concentric units that are separated by a narrow dark partition (Figure 2B,D-F; Additional file 1). Both units possess radial fibers, but those of the outer zone seem to be finer and more numerous. In some specimens the inner unit appears to be crumpled and this, together with the dentate margin (Figure 2D-F), suggests that at least partial closure was possible. The common feature of radial fibers surrounding the aperture, whether viewed from the interior or exterior, suggests that these structures defined the apertural walls and most likely served a structural or possibly muscular role. Their dark color may also indicate vascularization.
A second reason to support the idea of a more dynamic mode of suspension feeding in Vetulicola concerns its overall morphology, which is indicative of relatively active swimming. In principle this too would have assisted with intake of water. The final point, which is less secure, concerns the relatively small size of the apertures as against the inferred capaciousness of the interior cavity (as judged by the sediment infill). While this involves a number of imponderables, the ratio of aperture diameter to interior volume suggests that ciliary flow alone may not have been sufficient to remove the water efficiently.
We suggest that swallowing and the subsequent expulsion of water most likely would have been coordinated, with control of both the size of the oral opening and lateral apertures. If it is accepted that pumping of water was indeed an active process, then the alternating dilation and contraction most likely would have been mediated by a musculature. Exceptionally preserved material reveals a series of longitudinal structures connected by vertical units (Figure 4A,C-E; see also ). Similar, albeit less organized, soft tissues have been tentatively compared to either internal appendages or muscles . The structures described here are provisionally identified as body-wall musculature. We make here the assumption that originally they consisted of horizontal and longitudinal components so that their contractions would determine the volume of the anterior cavity (Figure 4F). Alternative possibilities, not least these structures might represent some part of the filtration unit, certainly merit attention. Nevertheless, the evidence already mentioned in support of a dilatory capacity by the grooves would imply the existence of some sort of antagonistic system. Our reconstruction of this muscular activity, which was possibly assisted by an inherent elasticity of the body wall, provides a working model.
Gill slits in other vetulicolian taxa
Feeding in a capacious pharynx
Discussion and Conclusions
Vetulicolians as members of the stem-group deuterostomes
A second possibility is that while it is evident that Vetulicola and related taxa form a coherent clade, broadly united in possessing a bipartite body with the anterior bearing a series of five perforations on either side, their wider relationships among the Metazoa are simply unresolvable. Given that a number of Cambrian groups such as the nectocariids [31, 32] and amiskwiids  remain in phylogenetic limbo (but see [34, 35]), the only option might be to add the vetulicolians to this roster and continue our efforts to find even better preserved material and/or related taxa that might serve to pinpoint their relationships.
There is, however, a third possibility, that is vetulicolians are some sort of deuterostome. The evidence we present of active pharyngeal pumping might invite comparison to advanced members of this clade, but because of the distinctive bodyplan of the vetulicolians we suggest that this functional feature re-evolved in groups such as the gnathosomes with which, apart from the pharyngeal openings, they share no significant features. We prefer to argue that the vetulicolians are members of the stem-group deuterostomes [13, 16, 17, 24]. Crucial in this regard is the interpretation of the laterally located openings, which as pharyngeal gill slits are taken to be diagnostic of the deuterostomes . Other than what at best seem to be remote analogies in the form of the minute anterior pores in the meiofaunal gastrotrichs  no phylum appears to possess comparable structures. On the assumption, therefore, that these openings are not convergent, then the deuterostome status of the vetulicolians means that the spacious anterior would be homologous with the pharynx and the lateral perforations are genuine gill slits.
This conclusion invites brief consideration of three inter-related questions: (a) what implications might the proposed homologies of the gill slits have on other features of the vetulicolians in the context of a deuterostome affinity? (b) What bearing do vetulicolians have on our understanding of deuterostome evolution, not least with respect to the chordates, ambulacrarians and xenoturbellids? And (c) what light might other Cambrian deuterostomes throw on the early evolution of this group?
Our aim here is as much to pose these questions as it is to arrive at unequivocal conclusions. Central to any argument is the recognition of homology. Patterson [38, 39] crystallized the discussion by proposing that homology might be recognized in terms of similarity, conjunction and most importantly congruence. Similarity stands on the shakiest ground given that while clearly these are lateral perforations located on the anterior, these proposed gill slits find no exact counterpart in any other deuterostome. However, pharyngeal openings show a remarkable diversity within the deuterostomes, not least among some of the extinct echinoderms . Their possession is, however, universally regarded as a synapomorphy of the deuterostomes . In addition, developmental data are consistent with the earliest deuterostome gill slits being derived from endodermal pockets  and in principle originally these might have been little more than pores. In the case of Patterson's [38, 39] criterion of what he termed conjunction we can at least argue that (a) vetulicolians do not possess any other structures that are more plausibly identified as gill slits, and (b) that their location on the anterior section is consistent with this identification. By congruence Patterson  meant a test for homology based 'on the equivalence of homology and synapomorphy' so that the proposed homology is consistent with the other homologies that are employed to define a monophyletic group. First, we can observe that beyond the deuterostomes no other group of metazoans has an array of lateral openings and as noted despite their undoubted homology  they still show an enormous range of anatomical configurations. What then of the relationship of this homology to others that might pin down more precisely where vetulicolians fall in the deuterostomes? The range of phylogenetic conclusions that have already been proposed  underlie the difficulty in finding other homologies that one might employ in the use of Patterson's criterion of congruence. In the absence of molecular data and the relative unlikelihood of identifying vetulicolian embryos indicating the fate of the blastopore, very few characters serve to unite the deuterostomes as a whole . Elsewhere we have suggested that vetulicolians had an endostyle and a mesodermal endoskeleton , but the evidence is somewhat circumstantial. It is, however, also worth drawing attention to Romer's prescient suggestion  that an ancestral form had a bipartite form of a 'somatic' unit with musculature and a 'visceral' component with gill slits. Romer applied this concept to the chordates, but we have argued that his 'dual animal' hypothesis is just as consistent when applied to the vetulicolian bodyplan .
If one accepts vetulicolians as deuterostomes then this leads to the question of their possible relationships to the other major groups within this superclade. As already noted we argue that a position within the stem-group deuterostomes is the best phylogenetic solution, but as is often the case in such problematic animals from the Cambrian the correct identification of homologies is crucial. In this context the case of the putative cephalopod Nectoccaris [31, 32, 34, 35] provides a useful parallel. Thus any attempt to link the vetulicolians to one or other group within either the ambulcrarians or chordates is largely frustrated not only by the paucity of obvious homologies, but in addition evidence for radical reorganization of some bodyplans (notably echinoderms ) as well as both molecular  and fossil  data that suggest other groups (notably amphioxus) are more or less degenerate. Nowhere is this more evident than in the xenoturbellids (and acoelomorph flatworms) which now appear to be massively simplified deuterostomes (now comprising the Xenocoelomorpha) and the sister group to the ambulacrarians . As such they are uninformative as to either the appearance of the most primitive deuterostomes (let alone bilaterians ) or by implication the putative position of the vetulicolians.
Finally, we can ask as to whether, apart from bona fide chordates and the like [24, 45], are there other Cambrian animals that might be informative with respect to early deuterostome evolution? Foremost in this regard are the coeval yunnanozoans, which elsewhere we have argued [16, 24, 48] provide a link not only between the vetulicolians but possibly also with representatives of the stem-group chordates . As with the vetulicolians their distinctive bodyplan has led to a diversity of opinions as to their exact placement, but a general consensus places them in the deuterostomes [16, 20, 24, 48]. While a key piece of evidence is the series of external filamentous gills, especially in Haikouella , unequivocal evidence of pharyngeal openings in any yunnanozoan appears to be wanting.
The results we report here have a bearing on the yunnanozoans in as much as just as the vetulicolians have been compared to arthropods, so too Bergström  agrees with earlier observations [24, 49] that yunnanozoans have a segmented cuticular surface, at odds with their interpretation as myomeres . This feature, however, need not equate with either an arthropodan or ecdysozoan relationship; nor do we accept Bergström's  interpretation of a specimen described by us earlier  as evidence for molting. The evidence for a cuticular surface suggests that at least some members of the stem-group deuterostomes possessed a hardened, albeit non-mineralized, exterior. Elsewhere, a remnant of this feature has been tentatively identified in the stem-group chordate Pikaia .
To conclude, in our view the demonstration that the anterior lateral structures in Vetulicola not only have a complex configuration but also unequivocally include perforations is consistent with this animal and related taxa belonging to the deuterostomes. So too the identification of a capacious pharyngeal cavity lined with ventral and dorsal food grooves is consistent with the deuterostome bodyplan and the likely origin of the lateral openings so as to allow exit of seawater.
Deuterostome disparity, both between and within the xenoturbellids, ambulacrarians and chordates, is considerable. Despite now largely secure molecular phylogenies a stumbling block has been how best to envisage the common ancestor. There seems little evidence to suggest that the vetulicolians can be interpreted as the sister group of any of the major groups of deuterostome. There is, for instance, no evidence that the gill slits emptied into a common atrium or otherwise collected the water and expelled it via a single opening. In this and other respects vetulicolians differ from the tunicates . There is, however, one point of comparison that may be relevant. While nearly all tunicates  are suspension feeders, among the pelagic representatives the salps are exceptional in employing a muscular pumping . While this is associated with a form of jet propulsion , the antagonistic system that involves the tunic and the possibility that this pumping system may have originated in the context of filtration  invites analogies with Vetulicola. This analogy is, of course, with respect to the dynamics of pumping and given the large and evidently propulsive tail there is no suggestion Vetulicola employed any sort of jet propulsion.
We suggest that despite uncertainties the anatomical evidence presented is consistent with Vetulicola and its allies as being deuterostomes. While aware that the disparity among the crown-group deuterostomes makes comparisons with the vetulicolians problematic, we are unable to identify any character that would secure the place of this Cambrian group within either the ambulcrarians or chordates. We suggest that the vetulicolians are more likely to be members of the stem-group deuterostomes. If our interpretation of the vetulicolians as being among the earliest deuterostomes is correct then this has a number of important implications. First, it is consistent with the suggestion that such ancestral deuterostomes were not sessile, but free-living animals [13, 16, 54, 55] with an expanded pharyngeal cavity. We take this feature, along with five pairs of gill slits and dorsal and ventral feeding gutters, to represent the primitive condition, and is consistent with the supposition that a filter-feeding pharynx had evolved in the last common ancestor of all deuterostomes [36, 56, 57]. In addition, we conclude that at least in Vetulicola active pharyngeal pumping had evolved, and presumably it arose independently of the system seen in the salps and also more advanced gnathostomes.
Even making allowances for loss and simplification, as well as once popular comparisons (such as the hemichordate stomochord to chordate notochord ) very few anatomical homologies serve to unite all the deuterostomes. In this latter respect the pharyngeal openings are a key character. For example, in his proposal that suspension feeding was a feature to emerge very early in the history of deuterostomes, Cameron  remarked how 'Clearly the evolution of slits in the pharynx is one of the most important events in the evolution of the deuterostomes'. In our view their identification in the vetulicolians supports the idea that they helped to open the doors to deuterostome diversification, first in terms of effectiveness of feeding and subsequently efficiency of respiratory exchange . Elaborations in the form of the gill slits in both the ambulacrarians and chordates are marked by convergences , but in their various configurations they presumably helped to contribute to the success of this phylum. So too we see evolutionary innovation in terms of the disposal of the water, such as the subsequent development of an atrium, and arrangement of food grooves to a single ciliated tract either ventrally (enteropneusts) or dorsally (amphioxus and tunicates). Much of subsequent deuterostome evolution appears to have been driven by ecologies that either favored sessility, with the reduction (as in the pterobranchs) or ultimate loss (as in the echinoderms) of gill slits, or increased motility. The latter may have ultimately led to the transformation of the dorsoposterior segmentation seen in the yunnanozoans [24, 48] into a myotomal arrangement with the corresponding evolution of the notochord in the chordates . In conclusion, calls that more data be collected to help secure phylogenetic arguments [4, 5] can now be met on the basis of exceptional material. On this basis we argue that the vetulicolians provide an important benchmark in the documentation of the emergence of the deuterostomes.
A total of 480 specimens of various vetulicolian taxa (10 species referred to 7 genera), recovered from five localities (Erjie, Sanjie, Jianshan, Tanglipo, and Maotianshan sections) at more or less coeval horizons in the Heilinpu Formation (Lower Cambrian, approximately 520 million years ago), Yunnan, southern China, were prepared and analyzed. About 50 three-dimensionally preserved specimens were 'dissected' to reveal internal anatomy. Details were analyzed using a Zeiss Stemi-2000C microscope (Jena, Germany).
Specimens were reposited in the Early Life Institute (ELI), Northwest University, Xi'an, the Early Life Evolution Laboratory (ELEL), China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, and the Chengjiang Fauna Museum, Chengjiang Fauna National Geopark, Kunming (CFM), China.
We thank Cheng Meirong, Zhai Juanping, Lei Qianping, and Wang Manyan for help in field and laboratory work. Thanks are also given to Vivien Brown for assistance with manuscript preparation. The four anonymous reviewers provided outstanding and helpful critiques. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant no. 41102012, 41272019, 40802011, 40830208, 40602003, and Shaanxi-2011JZ006); the PhD programs of the Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (20116101130002); the 111 Project (P201102007); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 2010ZY07, 2011YXL013, and 2012097); the MOST Special Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University; St John's College, Cambridge and Cowper Reed Fund (SCM).
- Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sørensen MV, Haddock SH, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G: Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008, 452: 745-750. 10.1038/nature06614.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguñà J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, Wiens M, Seaver E, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G, Dunn CW: Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 276: 4315-4322. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Budd GE, Jensen S: A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian taxa. Biol Reviews. 2000, 75: 253-295. 10.1017/S000632310000548X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swalla BJ, Smith AB: Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008, 363: 1557-1568. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donoghue PCJ, Purnell MA: Distinguishing heat from light in debate over controversial fossils. BioEssays. 2009, 31: 178-189. 10.1002/bies.200800128.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hou XG: Early Cambrian large bivalved arthropods from Chengjiang. Acta Palaeontol Sinica. 1987, 26: 286-298.Google Scholar
- Briggs DEG, Lieberman BS, Halgedahl SL, Jarrard RD: A new metazoan from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and the nature of Vetulicolia. Palaeontol. 2005, 48: 681-686. 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2005.00489.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butterfield NJ: Vetulicola cuneata from the Lower Cambrian Mural Formation, Jasper National Park, Canada [abstract]. Palaeont Assoc Newsl. 2005, 60: 17-Google Scholar
- Zhang XL, Hua H: Soft-bodied fossils from the Shipai Formation, Lower Cambrian of the Three Gorge area, South China. Geol Mag. 2005, 142: 699-709. 10.1017/S0016756805000518.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caron JB: Banffia constricta, a putative vetulicolid from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci. 2006, 96: 95-111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- García-Bellido DC, Paterson JR, Edgecombe GD, Jago JB, Gehling JG, Lee MSY: A vetulicolid-banffozoan intermediate from the Early Cambrian Emu Bay Lagerstätte, South Australia. Programme & Abstracts of the Third International Palaeontological Congress: 2010: London. 2010, 177-Google Scholar
- Yang J, Hou XG, Cong PY, Dong W, Zhang YX, Luo MB: A new vetulicoliid from lower Cambrian, Kunming, Yunnan. Acta Palaeontol Sinica. 2010, 49: 54-63.Google Scholar
- Vinther J, Smith MP, Harper DAT: Vetulicolians from the Lower Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte, North Greenland, and the polarity of morphological characteristics in basal deuterostomes. Palaeontol. 2011, 54: 711-719. 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01034.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo HL, Hu SX, Chen LZ, Zhang SS, Tao YH: Early Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna from Kunming Region, China. 1999, Kunming, China: Yunnan Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar
- Shu DG, Conway Morris S, Zhang XL, Chen L, Li Y, Han J: A pipiscid-like fossil from the Lower Cambrian of south China. Nature. 1999, 400: 746-749. 10.1038/23445.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shu DG, Conway Morris S, Han J, Chen L, Zhang XL, Zhang ZF, Liu HQ, Li Y, Liu JN: Primitive deuterostomes from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (Lower Cambrian, China). Nature. 2001, 414: 419-424. 10.1038/35106514.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shu DG: On the phylum Vetulicolia. Chinese Sci Bull. 2005, 50: 2342-2354.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen AL, Feng HZ, Zhu MY, Ma DS, Li M: A new vetulicolian from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang fauna in Yunnan of China. Acta Geol Sinica. 2003, 77: 281-287. 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2003.tb00742.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergström J: The earliest arthropods and other animals. Darwin's Heritage Today. Proceedings of the Darwin 200 International Conference 24-26 October 2009: Beijing. Edited by: Long M, Zhou Z, Gu, H. 2010, Beijing, China: Higher Education Press, 29-42.Google Scholar
- Chen JY: The sudden appearance of diverse animal body plans during the Cambrian explosion. Int J Developmental Biol. 2009, 53: 733-751. 10.1387/ijdb.072513cj.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JY: Early crest animals and the insight they provide into the evolutionary origin of craniates. Genesis. 2008, 46: 623-639. 10.1002/dvg.20445.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aldridge RJ, Hou XG, Siveter DJ, Siveter DJ, Gabbott SE: The systematics and phylogenetic relationships of vetulicolians. Palaeontol. 2007, 50: 131-168. 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00606.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lieberman BS: The Cambrian radiation of bilaterians: evolutionary origins and palaeontological emergence; earth history change and biotic factors. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol. 2008, 258: 180-188. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.05.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shu DG, Conway Morris S, Zhang ZF, Han J: The earliest history of deuterostomes: the importance of the Chengjiang Fossil-Lagerstätte. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010, 277: 165-174. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0646.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lacalli TC: Vetulicolians - are they deuterostomes? Chordates?. BioEssays. 2002, 24: 208-211. 10.1002/bies.10064.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominguez-Alonso P, Jefferies RPS: What were the vetulicolids?. Abstracts of the 51st Symposium of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Comparative Anatomy. Edited by: Barrett PM. 2003, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Museum of Natural History, 15-Google Scholar
- Butterfield NJ: Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian explosion. Integrative Comparative Biol. 2003, 43: 166-177. 10.1093/icb/43.1.166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JY: The Dawn of the Animal World. 2004, Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar
- Daley AC, Budd GE, Caron J-B, Edgecombe GD, Collins D: The Burgess Shale anomalocaridid Hurdia and its significance for early arthropod evolution. Science. 2009, 323: 1597-1600. 10.1126/science.1169514.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harvey THP, Vélez MI, Butterfield NJ: Exceptionally preserved crustaceans from western Canada reveal a cryptic Cambrian radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109: 1589-1594. 10.1073/pnas.1115244109.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kröger B, Vinther J, Fuchs D: Cephalopod origin and evolution: a congruent picture emerging from fossils, development and molecules. Bioessays. 2011, 33: 602-613. 10.1002/bies.201100001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mazurek D, Zatoń M: Is Nectocaris pteryx a cephalopod?. Lethaia. 2011, 44: 2-4. 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2010.00253.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conway Morris S: A redescription of the Middle Cambrian Amiskwia sagittiformis Walcott from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Paläont Zeitschrift. 1977, 51: 271-287.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith MR, Caron JB: Primitive soft-bodied cephalopods from the Cambrian. Nature. 2010, 465: 469-472. 10.1038/nature09068.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith MR, Caron JB: Nectocaris and early cephalopod evolution: reply to Mazurek and Zatoń. Lethaia. 2011, 44: 369-372. 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2011.00295.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillis AJ, Fritzenwanker JH, Lowe CJ: A stem-deuterostome origin of the vertebrate pharyngeal transcriptional network. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012, 279: 237-246. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0599.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruppert EE: Comparative ultrastructure of the gastrotrich pharynx and the evolution of myoepithelial foreguts in aschelminthes. Zoomorphology. 1982, 99: 181-220. 10.1007/BF00312295.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patterson C: Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol Biol Evol. 1988, 5: 603-625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patterson C: Morphological characters and homology. Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction Syst Assoc Spec Vol 21. Edited by: Joysey KA, Friday AE. 1982, London, UK: Academic Press, 21-74.Google Scholar
- Jefferies RPS: The Ancestry of the Vertebrates. 1986, London, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Ruppert EE: Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies?. Canadian J Zool. 2005, 83: 8-23. 10.1139/z04-158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romer AS: The vertebrate as a dual animal - somatic and visceral. Evoln Biol. 1972, 6: 121-156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zamora S, Rahman IA, Smith AB: Plated Cambrian bilaterians reveal the earliest stages of echinoderm evolution. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e38296-10.1371/journal.pone.0038296.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pani AM, Mullarkey EE, Aronowicz J, Assimacopoulos S, Grove EA, Lowe CJ: Ancient deuterostome origins of vertebrate brain signalling centres. Nature. 2012, 483: 289-294. 10.1038/nature10838.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conway Morris S, Caron JB: Pikaia gracilens Walcott, a stem-group chordate from the Middle Cambrian of British Columbia. Biol Rev. 2012, 87: 480-512. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00220.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, Wallberg A, Peterson KJ, Telford MJ: Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature. 2011, 470: 255-258. 10.1038/nature09676.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lowe CJ, Pani AM: Animal evolution: a soap opera of unremarkable worms. Current Biol. 2011, 21: R151-R153. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shu DG, Conway Morris S, Zhang ZF, Liu JN, Han J, Chen L, Zhang XL, Yasui K, Li Y: A new species of yunnanozoan with implications for deuterostome evolution. Science. 2003, 299: 1380-1384. 10.1126/science.1079846.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergström J, Naumann WW, Viehweg J, Martí-Mus M: Conodonts, calcichordates and the origin of vertebrates. Mitteilungen Museum Naturkunde Berlin Geowissenschaftliche Reihe. 1998, 1: 81-92.Google Scholar
- Robison BH, Rasskoff KA, Sherlock RE: Adaptations for living deep: a new bathypelagic doliolid, from the eastern North Pacific. J Marine Biol Ass UK. 2005, 85: 595-602. 10.1017/S0025315405011525.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bone Q, Carré C, Chang P: Tunicate feeding filters. J Marine Biol Ass UK. 2003, 83: 907-919. 10.1017/S002531540300804Xh.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland KR, Madin LP: Comparative jet wake structure and swimming performance of salps. J Exp Biol. 2010, 213: 2967-2975. 10.1242/jeb.041962.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland KR, Madin LP: A comparison of filtration rates among pelagic tunicates using kinematic measurements. Marine Biol. 2010, 157: 755-764. 10.1007/s00227-009-1359-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lacalli TC: Protochordate body plan and the evolutionary role of larvae: old controversies resolved?. Canadian J Zool. 2005, 83: 216-224. 10.1139/z04-162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Satoh N: An aboral-dorsalization hypothesis for chordate origin. Genesis. 2008, 46: 614-622. 10.1002/dvg.20416.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez P, Cameron CB: The gill slits and pre-oral ciliary organ of Protoglossus (Hemichordata: Enteropneusta) are filter-feeding structures. Biol J Linnean Soc. 2009, 98: 898-906. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01332.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cameron CB: Particle retention and flow in the pharynx of the enteropneust worm Harrimania planktophilus: the filter-feeding pharynx may have evolved before the chordates. Biol Bull. 2002, 202: 192-200. 10.2307/1543655.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mayer G, Bartolomaeus T: Ultrastructure of the stomochord and the heart-glomerulus complex in Rhabdopleura compacta (Pterobranchia): phylogenetic implications. Zoomorphology. 2003, 122: 125-133. 10.1007/s00435-003-0078-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD, PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica. 2001, 4: 1-9.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.