Evolutionary origin of gastrulation: insights from sponge development
© Nakanishi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 January 2014
Accepted: 17 March 2014
Published: 28 March 2014
The evolutionary origin of gastrulation—defined as a morphogenetic event that leads to the establishment of germ layers—remains a vexing question. Central to this debate is the evolutionary relationship between the cell layers of sponges (poriferans) and eumetazoan germ layers. Despite considerable attention, it remains unclear whether sponge cell layers undergo progressive fate determination akin to eumetazoan primary germ layer formation during gastrulation.
Here we show by cell-labelling experiments in the demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica that the cell layers established during embryogenesis have no relationship to the cell layers of the juvenile. In addition, juvenile epithelial cells can transdifferentiate into a range of cell types and move between cell layers. Despite the apparent lack of cell layer and fate determination and stability in this sponge, the transcription factor GATA, a highly conserved eumetazoan endomesodermal marker, is expressed consistently in the inner layer of A. queenslandica larvae and juveniles.
Our results are compatible with sponge cell layers not undergoing progressive fate determination and thus not being homologous to eumetazoan germ layers. Nonetheless, the expression of GATA in the sponge inner cell layer suggests a shared ancestry with the eumetazoan endomesoderm, and that the ancestral role of GATA in specifying internalised cells may antedate the origin of germ layers. Together, these results support germ layers and gastrulation evolving early in eumetazoan evolution from pre-existing developmental programs used for the simple patterning of cells in the first multicellular animals.
KeywordsEvolution Gastrulation Germ layers Sponge development GATA
It has been long argued and widely accepted that early metazoan evolution included the progressive addition and elaboration of cell layers, with the first animals being little more than a small sphere of epithelial cells. The addition of a second inner layer is thought to have followed, resulting in the so-called ‘gastraea’ that possessed an ectoderm and endoderm. A middle mesodermal layer is proposed to have evolved last [1, 2]. It has been noted that this progression is reflected in contemporary early branching animals, with sponges and placozoans being interpreted as having one, two or no germ layers, cnidarians and ctenophores possessing two or possibly three germ layers and bilaterians having three or possibly four [2, 3]. The generation of two or more germ layers by gastrulation and the consistency of the fate of these layers unites the Eumetazoa (though exceptions exist; for example, vertebrate tail-bud mesoderm ). Further, comparative developmental genetic evidence supports the homology of the endomesoderm  and ectodermal neurogenesis  across eumetazoans. However, it remains controversial whether the cell layers in sponges are homologous to eumetazoan germ layers and whether sponges undergo gastrulation.
Sponges utilise recognisable gastrulation-like morphogenetic movements during embryogenesis (for example, delamination, ingression, egression and invagination) and metamorphosis (for example, epithelial-mesenchyme transitions, EMT) (summarised in [8, 9]). In marine haplosclerid demosponges, for instance, morphological evidence suggests that early cleavage leads to the formation of a stereoblastula, which then delaminates to form a multilayered parenchymella larva (for example, Amphimedon queenslandica). In homoscleromorphs (for example, Oscarella spp.), multipolar egression of a stereoblastula generates a single-layered cinctoblastula larva , while in a hexactinillid (for example, Oopsacas minuta), cellular delamination of a coeloblastula gives rise to the trichimella larva [12, 13]. Interestingly, the pattern of embryogenesis can be polymorphic. In a halisarcid demosponge (for example, Halisarca dujardini), multipolar ingression and/or invagination of a coeloblastula or a stereoblastula forms a multilayered parenchymella or disphaerula (‘a hollow sphere within a sphere’) larva [14, 15]. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions are common at metamorphosis in diverse homoscleromorphs, calcareans and demosponges (reviewed in ).
Despite the occurrence of gastrulation-like morphogenetic processes in sponges, it is still unclear how sponge development relates to eumetazoan gastrulation, which is defined as a morphogenetic event that leads to the establishment of germ layers. Some authors consider cell movements that generate multi-layered embryos during sponge embryogenesis gastrulation (for example, [12, 16]), although some argue that gastrulation occurs during sponge metamorphosis when an adult internal layer develops by EMT and transdifferentiation of larval ciliated epithelial cells (for example, ). Yet it remains unclear whether sponge cell layers display the defining characteristic of eumetazoan gastrulation. This uncertainty led others to question the existence of germ layers, and hence gastrulation, in sponges (for example, ).
Here, we show by cell-labelling experiments in the demosponge A. queenslandica that the cell layers established during embryogenesis lack fixed identities and do not directly give rise to the cell layers of the juvenile. In addition, inner epithelial choanocytes in the juvenile can alter their fate by transdifferentiating into a range of cell types, including cells of the outer epithelium. Thus, sponge cell layers lack fate determination and stability. However, we find that expression of the sponge orthologue to the highly conserved eumetazoan endomesodermal marker GATA is consistently restricted to the inner layer of larvae and juveniles, suggesting a deep shared ancestry between the sponge internal cell layer and the eumetazoan endomesoderm.
Results and discussion
Germ layers by definition exhibit restricted cell fate [2, 3]. Thus, to address whether sponge embryonic and early juvenile cell layers are germ layers, we employed cell-labelling techniques in the demosponge A. queenslandica to examine the fate of larval epithelial and internal cells at metamorphosis, as well as the stability and fate of differentiated choanocytes in newly established juvenile tissues at the so-called ‘rhagon’ stage (staging described in Additional file 1: Figure S1).
The swimming A. queenslandica larva metamorphoses into a feeding juvenile with choanocyte chambers within three days of attaching its anterior end onto a natural substratum (crustose coralline algae) at 25°C. Within hours of settling, the three-layered, bullet-shaped larva transforms into an encrusting mat. A previous cell-labelling study in A. queenslandica indicated that external larval cells transdifferentiated into internal choanocytes in juveniles . However, it was not determined whether all cell types found on the larval exterior are transdifferentiating at metamorphosis, and whether the larval epithelial cells differentiate directly into choanocytes or indirectly via an intermediate cell type. In other sponges, the larval epithelial layer has been reported to shed entirely , be phagocytised by archeocytes [20–22], differentiate into choanocytes through a non-ciliated amoebocyte intermediate [23–25], or directly differentiate into choanocytes without loss of cilia  (reviewed in ). Using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end-labelling (TUNEL) assay for detecting apoptotic DNA fragmentation, we demonstrate that a large proportion of A. queenslandica larval epithelial cells undergo programmed cell death shortly after the onset of metamorphosis [see Additional file 2: Figure S2]. TUNEL-labelled nuclear fragments can be observed readily in the metamorphosing animal, often as phagocytised bodies within archeocytes [see Additional file 2: Figure S2].
Using the thymidine analog, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU), to label the nuclei of proliferating cells, we found that only amoeboid cells localised to the inner cell mass, identified here as archeocytes [see Additional file 4: Figure S4], and no other cell types, continue to proliferate in the swimming larva (Figure 2D). Taking advantage of this observation we followed the fate of these EdU-labelled cells during metamorphosis. We found that these archeocytes of the larval inner cell mass origin also gave rise to choanocytes and exopinacocytes during metamorphosis (Figure 2E, F). Together, these observations indicate that a range of larval cell types can generate the diversity of cell types present in the juvenile and that there is no correspondence between the cell layers established during embryogenesis and those produced at metamorphosis.
The lack of fate determination in cell layers in A. queenslandica is consistent with this demosponge lacking germ layers as classically defined. In light of this finding, genes shown to be instrumental in eumetazoan ectoderm or endomesoderm formation may not be expected to be present in demosponges. Indeed, of the genes previously implicated in the differentiation of the endomesoderm across Cnidaria and Bilateria, namely twist, snail, forkhead and GATA, only GATA was identified in the genome of the demosponge A. queenslandica [see Additional file 6: Figure S6]. Also, amongst the 51 transcription factor- and signalling molecule-encoding genes shown to be ‘endomesodermally’ expressed in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, only nine orthologues are present in the A. queenslandica genome [see Additional file 7: Table S1].
GATA genes are present in other early branching taxa, including placozoans, ctenophores and the other classes of sponges [33–35], although A. queenslandica is the only species for which there currently are published expression patterns. Understanding the evolution of germ layers will be assisted by the analysis of the evolution and expression of genes conserved in bilaterian mesoderm specification and formation, along with further analysis of developmental processes in these taxa. For example, recent analysis of the genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi failed to reveal many ‘mesodermal’ genes despite it appearing to have genuine endomesoderm , and it is known that cell movements from one embryonic layer to another occur during metamorphosis in some medusozoan cnidarians [36, 37]. These approaches, along with resolving the exact order in which these early-branching metazoans diverged from the lineage leading to bilaterians (that is, whether sponges or ctenophores are the sister group to all other animals and whether sponges are monophyletic [34, 38]), provide an opportunity to reconstruct the evolution of germ layers and gastrulation.
Comparison of demosponge and eumetazoan development and body plans minimally provides insights into their last common ancestor, which appears to have existed some 800 million years ago . Although the possibility that their last common ancestor possessed germ layers and these were lost in the demosponge lineage cannot be excluded, the lack of developmental commitment of larval and juvenile cell types in A. queenslandica and homology of internal layers across a demosponge and eumetazoans are consistent with eumetazoan germ layers and gastrulation evolving after the divergence of demosponge and eumetazoan lineages. Thus, we propose that ancestrally metazoans consisted of multiple cell layers whose fate was labile. The evolution of the gene regulatory network endowing progressive determination of cell layers resulted in the emergence of primary germ layers and mechanisms to segregate these layers in eumetazoans (that is, gastrulation). The origin of the majority of genes that have conserved roles in eumetazoan gastrulation and germ layer determination evolved after the divergence of demosponge and eumetazoan lineages (for example, Fkh, Twist, Snail), giving credence to this supposition. The conserved expression of GATA in cells located inside the body of all metazoans, along with conserved differential expression of Wnt and TGF-β ligands along demosponge and eumetazoan body axes , suggests that these genes were essential in providing critical positional information to cells in the first multicellular metazoans. These, along with eumetazoan-specific genes, later became essential components of the specification and determination of eumetazoan germ layers.
Adult A. queenslandica were collected at the Heron Island Research Station, Queensland, Australia. Larvae were collected upon release from adults and metamorphosing individuals were obtained by allowing larvae to settle and metamorphose on a plastic petri dish as previously described .
Cell lineage tracing with CM-DiI
The lipophilic tracer CM-DiI (Molecular Probes, C7000, Mulgrave, Victoria, AUS) was used to label ciliated epithelial cells in larvae and choanocytes in the juveniles. Larvae or juveniles were incubated in seawater with 10 μM CM-DiI. To differentially label the plasma membrane of ciliated epithelial cells, larvae were incubated for 12 hours. Incubation for one hour was sufficient to differentially label the majority of choanocytes in juveniles. Little labelling occurred in internal cells in larvae or juveniles. The labelled specimens were rinsed in fresh seawater several times and then allowed to develop further. Specimens were fixed as described below at various stages of development. Nuclei were labelled with the fluorescent dye 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1:1,000, Molecular Probes), and the specimens were mounted in ProlongGold antifade reagent (Molecular Probes).
EdU pulse-and-chase experiments
Larvae or juveniles were incubated in seawater containing 200 μM of the thymidine analogue, EdU (Click-iT EdU AlexaFluor 488 cell proliferation kit, C10337, Molecular Probes), for 16 to 18 hours to label nuclei of proliferating larval archeocytes, and for three hours to label S-phase nuclei in the juveniles. Following washes in fresh seawater, the juveniles were immediately fixed. The larvae with labelled archeocytes were allowed to metamorphose into the juvenile stage, which were then fixed. Fixed specimens underwent immunohistochemistry as described below. Following the immunohistochemistry procedure, fluorescent labelling of incorporated EdU was conducted according to the manufacture’s recommendations prior to DAPI labelling.
Immunohistochemistry, TUNEL and confocal microscopy
Larvae, postlarvae and juveniles were fixed as previously described . Fixed specimens were rehydrated and washed in PBST (phosphate-buffered saline + 0.1% Tween20) and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBST. Primary antibodies were incubated with the specimens in PBST. We used antibodies against phosphorylated histone H3 (phospho S10) (rabbit, 1:500, Abcam ab5176, Cambridge, MA, USA) and tyrosinated-∂-tubulin (mouse, 1:500, Sigma T9028, Castle Hill, NSW, AUS) overnight at 4°C. Following washes in PBST and blocking in 1% BSA in PBST, secondary antibodies were incubated with the specimens; we used AlexaFluor 568 (anti-rabbit or -mouse. 1:200, Molecular Probes) and AlexaFluor 647 (anti-rabbit or -mouse, 1:200, Molecular Probes). Filamentous actin was labelled using AlexaFluor 488-conjugated phallacidin (1:25, Molecular Probes). Specimens were incubated with phallacidin together with secondary antibodies. After washes in PBST, the TUNEL assay was performed by using an In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (TMR red cat no. 1684795, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Nuclei were labelled with DAPI and the specimens were mounted in ProlongGold antifade reagent as described above. Images were recorded using a Zeiss LSM 510 META Confocal Microscope and confocal stacks were viewed using ImageJ.
Gene isolation and whole-mount in situhybridization
AqGATA gene fragments were amplified with gene specific primers, by using complimentary DNA from mixed developmental stages as a PCR template. Gene specific primers were as follows: F1, ATGGAGAAAGCAGACGACGCTATGC; F2, CTACCAAGACAGTTTTGTGG; R1, CTACATCAATTGCTGTGGTTGCATGG and R2, ACTTTGACTTCTTTGACTCG. Primers F2 and R1 were used to generate a 776 base template for a riboprobe synthesis. Riboprobe synthesis and in situ hybridization were conducted as described previously . An antisense digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe was hybridised at a final concentration of 1 ng/μl.
Transmission electron microscopy
Free-swimming larvae were processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by using the high-pressure freezing (HPF) technique. Procedures followed the previously established HPF protocol for shark retinal tissues  with the following modifications: 20% BSA in artificial seawater was used as a cryoprotectant instead of the teleost ringer/0.7% agarose. In addition, 1% OsO4 was used in the freeze substitution cocktail. Longitudinal ultrathin sections were prepared and analysed.
We thank the staff at the Heron Island Research Station for the use of the facilities, Dr. Kathryn Green at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Queensland for preparing EM sections, and Degnan lab members for constructive discussions. This research was supported by an Australian Research Council grant to BMD.
- Hyman LH: The Invertebrates: Protozoa Through Ctenophora, Volume 1. 1940, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc: New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hall BK: Germ layers and the germ-layer theory revisited - primary and secondary germ layers, neural crest as a fourth germ layer, homology, and demise of the germ-layer theory. Evol Biol. 1998, 30: 121-186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martindale MQ: The evolution of metazoan axial properties. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6: 917-927. 10.1038/nrg1725.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martindale MQ, Pang K, Finnerty JR: Investigating the origins of triploblasty: ‘mesodermal’ gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa). Development. 2004, 131: 2463-2474. 10.1242/dev.01119.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakanishi N, Renfer E, Technau U, Rentzsch F: Nervous systems of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis are generated by ectoderm and endoderm and shaped by distinct mechanisms. Development. 2012, 139: 347-357. 10.1242/dev.071902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erpenbeck D, Worheide G: On the molecular phylogeny of sponges (Porifera). Zootaxa. 2007, 1668: 107-126.Google Scholar
- Gazave E, Lapebie P, Ereskovsky AV, Vacelet J, Renard E, Cardenas P, Borchiellini C: No longer demospongiae: Homoscleromorpha formal nomination as a fourth class of porifera. Hydrobiologia. 2012, 687: 3-10. 10.1007/s10750-011-0842-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV: The Comparative Embryology of Sponges. 2010, Dordrecht; New York: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leys SP: Gastrulation in sponges. Gastrulation, From Cells to Embryo. Edited by: Stern CD. 2004, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 23-31.Google Scholar
- Leys SP, Degnan BM: Embryogenesis and metamorphosis in a haplosclerid demosponge: gastrulation and transdifferentiation of larval ciliated cells to choanocytes. Invert Biol. 2002, 121: 171-189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV, Boury-Esnault N: Cleavage pattern in Oscarella species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Homoscleromorpha): transmission of maternal cells and symbiotic bacteria. J Nat Hist. 2002, 36: 1761-1775. 10.1080/00222930110069050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boury-Esnault N, Efremova S, Bezac C, Vacelet J: Reproduction of a hexactinellid sponge: first description of gastrulation by cellular determination in the Porifera. Invert Reprod Dev. 1999, 35: 187-201. 10.1080/07924259.1999.9652385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leys SP, Cheung E, Boury-Esnault N: Embryogenesis in the glass sponge Oopsacas minuta: formation of syncytia by fusion of blastomeres. Integr Comp Biol. 2006, 46: 104-117. 10.1093/icb/icj016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonobobleva E, Ereskovsky A: Polymorphism in free-swimming larvae of Halisarca dujardini (Demospongiae, Halisarcida). Sponge Science in the New Millennium: Papers Contributed to the VI International Sponge Conference, Rapallo (Italy), 29 September-5 October 2002, Volume 68. Edited by: Pansini M, Pronzato R, Bavestrello G, Manconi R. 2004, Genova, Italy: Boll Mus Ist Biol. Universitá di Genova, 349-356.Google Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV, Gonobobleva E: New data on embryonic development of Halisarca dujardini Johnson, 1842 (Demospongiae, Halisarcida). Zoosystema. 2000, 22: 355-368.Google Scholar
- Leys SP, Eerkes-Medrano D: Gastrulation in calcareous sponges: in search of Haeckel’s gastraea. Integr Comp Biol. 2005, 45: 342-351. 10.1093/icb/45.2.342.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simpson TL: Cell Biology of Sponges. 1984, New York: Springer-VerlagView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV, Korotkova GP: The reasons of sponge sexual morphogenesis peculiarities. Berliner Geowiss Abh. 1997, 20: 25-Google Scholar
- Bergquist PR, Green CR: Ultrastructural-study of settlement and metamorphosis in sponge larvae. Cahiers De Biologie Marine. 1977, 18: 289-302.Google Scholar
- Meewis H: Contribution a l’étude de l’embryogenése de chalinulidae: Haliclona limbata. Ann Soc R Zool Belg. 1939, 70: 201-243.Google Scholar
- Misevic GN, Burger MM: The molecular basis of species specific cell-cell recognition in marine sponges, and a study on organogenesis during metamorphosis. Prog Clin Biol Res B. 1982, 85: 193-209.Google Scholar
- Misevic GN, Schlup V, Burger MM: Larval metamorphosis of Microciona prolifera: evidence against the reversal of layers. New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. Edited by: Rutzler K. 1990, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 182-187.Google Scholar
- Minchin EA: Note on the larva and the postlarval development of Leucosolenia variabilis, H. sp., with remarks on the development of other Asconidae. Proc R Soc Lond. 1896, 60: 42-52. 10.1098/rspl.1896.0013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amano S, Hori I: Metamorphosis of coeloblastula performed by multipotential larval flagellated cells in the calcareous sponge Leucosolenia laxa. Biol Bull. 2001, 200: 20-32. 10.2307/1543082.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amano S, Hori I: Metamorphosis of calcareous sponges. 2. Cell rearrangement and differentiation in metamorphosis. Invert Reprod Dev. 1993, 24: 13-26. 10.1080/07924259.1993.9672327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV, Tokina DB, Bezac C, Boury-Esnault N: Metamorphosis of cinctoblastula larvae (Homoscleromorpha, Porifera). J Morphol. 2007, 268: 518-528. 10.1002/jmor.10506.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ereskovsky AV, Renard E, Borchiellini C: Cellular and molecular processes leading to embryo formation in sponges: evidences for high conservation of processes throughout animal evolution. Dev Genes Evol. 2013, 223: 5-22. 10.1007/s00427-012-0399-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava M, Simakov O, Chapman J, Fahey B, Gauthier ME, Mitros T, Richards GS, Conaco C, Dacre M, Hellsten U, Larroux C, Putnam NH, Stanke M, Adamska M, Darling A, Degnan SM, Oakley TH, Plachetzki DC, Zhai YF, Adamski M, Calcino A, Cummins SF, Goodstein DM, Harris C, Jackson DJ, Leys SP, Shu SQ, Woodcroft BJ, Vervoort M, Kosik KS, et al: The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature. 2010, 466: 720-723. 10.1038/nature09201.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rottinger E, Dahlin P, Martindale MQ: A framework for the establishment of a cnidarian gene regulatory network for “endomesoderm” specification: the inputs of ss-catenin/TCF signaling. PLoS Genetics. 2012, 8: e1003164-10.1371/journal.pgen.1003164.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillis WJ, Bowerman B, Schneider SQ: Ectoderm- and endomesoderm-specific GATA transcription factors in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilli. Evol Dev. 2007, 9: 39-50. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00136.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiodin M, Borve A, Berezikov E, Ladurner P, Martinez P, Hejnol A: Mesodermal gene expression in the acoel Isodiametra pulchra indicates a low number of mesodermal cell types and the endomesodermal origin of the gonads. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e55499-10.1371/journal.pone.0055499.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyle MJ, Seaver EC: Developmental expression of foxA and gata genes during gut formation in the polychaete annelid, Capitella sp I. Evol Dev. 2008, 10: 89-105. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00216.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, Putnam NH, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Kuo A, Mitros T, Salamov A, Carpenter ML, Signorovitch AY, Moreno MA, Kamm K, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Shapiro H, Grigoriev IV, Buss LW, Schierwater B, Dellaporta SL, Rokhsar DS: The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature. 2008, 454: 955-960. 10.1038/nature07191.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryan JF, Pang K, Schnitzler CE, Nguyen AD, Moreland RT, Simmons DK, Koch BJ, Francis WR, Havlak P, Comparative Sequencing Program NISC, Smith SA, Putnam NH, Haddock SH, Dunn CW, Wolfsberg TG, Mullikin JC, Martindale MQ, Baxevanis AD: The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science. 2013, 342: 1242592-10.1126/science.1242592.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riesgo A, Farrar N, Windsor PJ, Giribet G, Leys SP: The analysis of eight transcriptomes from all poriferan classes reveals surprising genetic complexity in sponges. Mol Biol Evol. 2014, doi:10.1093/molbev/msu057Google Scholar
- Yuan D, Nakanishi N, Jacobs DK, Hartenstein V: Embryonic development and metamorphosis of the scyphozoan Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). Dev Genes Evol. 2008, 218: 525-539. 10.1007/s00427-008-0254-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weis V, Buss L: Ultrastructure of metamorphosis in Hydractinia echinata. Postilla. 1987, 199: 1-20.Google Scholar
- Sperling EA, Peterson KJ, Pisani D: Phylogenetic-signal dissection of nuclear housekeeping genes supports the paraphyly of sponges and the monophyly of Eumetazoa. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26: 2261-2274. 10.1093/molbev/msp148.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erwin DH, Laflamme M, Tweedt SM, Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ: The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science. 2011, 334: 1091-1097. 10.1126/science.1206375.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adamska M, Degnan SM, Green KM, Adamski M, Craigie A, Larroux C, Degnan BM: Wnt and TGF-beta expression in the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica and the origin of metazoan embryonic patterning. PLoS One. 2007, 2: e1031-10.1371/journal.pone.0001031.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leys SP, Larroux C, Gauthier M, Adamska M, Fahey B, Richards GS, Degnan SM, Degnan BM: Isolation of Amphimedon developmental material. CSH protocols. 2008, 2008: pdb.prot5095Google Scholar
- Larroux C, Fahey B, Liubicich D, Hinman VF, Gauthier M, Gongora M, Green K, Worheide G, Leys SP, Degnan BM: Developmental expression of transcription factor genes in a demosponge: insights into the origin of metazoan multicellularity. Evol Dev. 2006, 8: 150-173. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00086.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harahush BK, Green K, Webb R, Hart NS, Collin SP: Optimal preservation of the shark retina for ultrastructural analysis: an assessment of chemical, microwave, and high-pressure freezing fixation techniques. Microsc Res Tech. 2012, 75: 1218-1228. 10.1002/jemt.22052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Woollacott RM: Structure and swimming behavior of the larva of Haliclona tubifera (Porifera, Demospongiae). J Morphol. 1993, 218: 301-321. 10.1002/jmor.1052180306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Felsenfeld G, Evans T, Reitman M: An erythrocyte-specific DNA-binding factor recognizes a regulatory sequence common to all chicken globin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988, 85: 5976-5980. 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5976.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mnemiopsis Genome Project Portal. [http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/mnemiopsis/]
- Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi]
- Acropora digitifera Genome (Ver 1.1). [http://marinegenomics.oist.jp/genomes/viewer?project_id=3¤t_assembly_version=oist_v1.1]
- Compagen: A comparative genomics platform for early branching Metazoa. [http://compagen.zoologie.uni-kiel.de/]
- Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gascuel O, Guindon S: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52: 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whelan S, Goldman N: A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 691-699. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simionato E, Ledent V, Richards G, Thomas-Chollier M, Kerner P, Coornaert D, Degnan BM, Vervoort M: Origin and diversification of the basic helix-loop-helix gene family in metazoans: insights from comparative genomics. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 33-10.1186/1471-2148-7-33.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larroux C, Luke GN, Koopman P, Rokhsar DS, Shimeld SM, Degnan BM: Genesis and expansion of metazoan transcription factor gene classes. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 980-996. 10.1093/molbev/msn047.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larroux C, Fahey B, Degnan SM, Adamski M, Rokhsar DS, Degnan BM: The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of Hox genes. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 706-710.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryan JF, Mazza ME, Pang K, Matus DQ, Baxevanis AD, Martindale MQ, Finnerty JR: Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS One. 2007, 2: e153-10.1371/journal.pone.0000153.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerner P, Degnan SM, Marchand L, Degnan BM, Vervoort M: Evolution of RNA-binding proteins in animals: insights from genome-wide analysis in the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28: 2289-2303. 10.1093/molbev/msr046.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adamska M, Larroux C, Adamski M, Green K, Lovas E, Koop D, Richards GS, Zwafink C, Degnan BM: Structure and expression of conserved Wnt pathway components in the demosponge Amphimedon queenslandica. Evol Dev. 2010, 12: 494-518. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00435.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.