Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Denitrification in human dental plaque

  • †1Email author,
  • †1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 3, 4
†Contributed equally
BMC Biology20108:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-24

©  Schreiber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

  • Received: 22 December 2009
  • Accepted: 22 March 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Microbial denitrification is not considered important in human-associated microbial communities. Accordingly, metabolic investigations of the microbial biofilm communities of human dental plaque have focused on aerobic respiration and acid fermentation of carbohydrates, even though it is known that the oral habitat is constantly exposed to nitrate (NO3-) concentrations in the millimolar range and that dental plaque houses bacteria that can reduce this NO3- to nitrite (NO2-).

Results

We show that dental plaque mediates denitrification of NO3- to nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2) using microsensor measurements, 15N isotopic labelling and molecular detection of denitrification genes. In vivo N2O accumulation rates in the mouth depended on the presence of dental plaque and on salivary NO3- concentrations. NO and N2O production by denitrification occurred under aerobic conditions and was regulated by plaque pH.

Conclusions

Increases of NO concentrations were in the range of effective concentrations for NO signalling to human host cells and, thus, may locally affect blood flow, signalling between nerves and inflammatory processes in the gum. This is specifically significant for the understanding of periodontal diseases, where NO has been shown to play a key role, but where gingival cells are believed to be the only source of NO. More generally, this study establishes denitrification by human-associated microbial communities as a significant metabolic pathway which, due to concurrent NO formation, provides a basis for symbiotic interactions.

Keywords

  • Nitric Oxide
  • Dental Plaque
  • Beetroot Juice
  • Aerobic Denitrification
  • Denitrification Gene

Background

The human body is naturally colonised by a diverse array of micro-organisms whose metabolic activity is important for human physiology and health [1]. Most studies that assess the functional potentials and controls of these complex communities rely on: (i) the characterisation of individual isolates or enrichments, (ii) quantification of micro-organisms that are thought to mediate a certain process, or (iii) metagenomic analysis of a certain body region. Established methods of microbial ecology that allow the direct measurement of metabolic conversions in natural microbial samples from humans under different experimental conditions, such as incubation with isotopically-labelled substrates, dye probes for specific compounds combined with microscopy or electrochemical microsensors, are rarely reported. However, different microbial pathways, including fermentation, sulfate reduction, methanogenesis and acetogenesis [2–5], have been proposed to occur in humans. Surprisingly, denitrification (the respiratory reduction of nitrate (NO3-) or nitrite (NO2-) via nitric oxide (NO) to nitrous oxide (N2O) or dinitrogen (N2) [6]) is believed to be insignificant in human-associated microbial communities [7], even though NO3- and NO2- co-occur in significant concentrations with micro-organisms in various body regions, such as the human oral cavity [8].

Denitrification is performed by facultative anaerobic micro-organisms and is coupled to the oxidation of reduced organic carbon or reduced inorganic compounds, such as ferrous iron, hydrogen sulfide or hydrogen [6, 9]. The reductive sequence (NO3- > NO2- > NO > N2O > N2) of denitrification is mediated by periplasmic and membrane-bound enzymes specific for each step. The most important genes for the detection of denitrification in complex microbial samples are narG for NO3- reductase, nirS and nirK for NO2- reductases, qnorB or cnorB for NO reductases, and nosZ for N2O reductase. Denitrifying bacteria release NO or N2O as intermediates during metabolic activity in pure culture [10, 11] and in complex microbial communities, such as soils [12], nitrogen cycling biofilms [13] and ingested bacteria within different invertebrates guts [14, 15].

Notably, human saliva contains NO3- concentrations in the millimolar range, because dietary NO3- is concentrated in salivary glands after it is absorbed from the intestine into the blood [8]. Thus, the human-associated microbial biofilm community of dental plaque and bacteria that cover other oral surfaces are exposed to NO3-. However, investigations of plaque metabolism have focused on aerobic respiration and acid fermentation of carbohydrates [16]. Experiments with rat tongues as well as tooth and other surfaces in the human mouth have shown that salivary NO3- can be converted by oral micro-organisms to NO2-, explaining the presence of NO2- in addition to NO3- in saliva [17, 18]. Detection of NO in air incubated in the human mouth has led to the hypothesis that bacterially-derived salivary NO2- is chemically reduced to NO in acidic microenvironments in the oral cavity [18, 19]. The underlying processes have never been directly demonstrated because NO could not be measured in dental biofilms over relevant spatial scales. Therefore, other investigators considered NO2- in human saliva a stable oxidation product of NO synthase-derived NO that is produced by gingival cells to regulate the gum immune and vascular systems [20, 21].

Due to the possible formation of NO, plaque nitrogen metabolism might be important to dental health. Dental plaque causes periodontal diseases and dental caries, affecting almost every human being [22, 23]. As an inflammatory disorder of gum tissue surrounding the teeth, periodontal diseases might be especially affected by nitrogen metabolism of dental plaque, if NO is generated as a side product at the gum-plaque interface. NO plays a complex, but not well understood role in periodontal diseases [24, 25]. NO, at low concentrations, is an important signalling molecule that coordinates functions of immune system cells that are involved in inflammatory processes [26]. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides stimulate production of proinflammatory cytokines, which induce production of high, cytotoxic NO concentrations by certain immune system cells. Furthermore, high NO levels during inflammation induce expression of matrix metalloproteinases in neutrophiles, which mediate soft tissue degradation [27].

Besides its potential importance to dental health, oral nitrogen metabolism is important for human physiology [8]. The formation of NO2- as a denitrification intermediate by oral micro-organisms leads to chemical conversion of NO2- to NO in the acidic stomach, acting as an antimicrobial agent against pathogenic bacteria and stimulating gastric blood flow. Moreover, NO2- is absorbed into plasma, where it serves as a NO source for the regulation of vasodilatation under hypoxic conditions [8]. It is still unclear whether microbial nitrogen metabolism in human dental plaque is significant in comparison to other oral surfaces.

In the present study, we hypothesise that dental plaque represents a habitat for microbial denitrification in humans, driving the biological conversion of salivary NO3- to the denitrification intermediates NO and N2O, and to the final product N2. We use direct microbial ecology methods, including a recently developed NO microsensor [28], to demonstrate in situ NO formation during denitrification in dental plaque and to show that NO is formed at concentrations that are significant for signalling to host tissue. In addition, we aim to show the in vivo significance of plaque denitrification for the formation of denitrification intermediates by correlating the oral accumulation of N2O in humans to salivary NO3-/NO2- concentrations and to the presence of plaque.

Results

Dental plaque mediates aerobic denitrification

Dental plaque converted NO3- to N2 by denitrification. This was shown by 30N2 formation from 15NO3- during incubation of dispersed dental plaque (Figure 1a). The occurrence of complete denitrification in dental biofilms was corroborated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of all genes (NO3- reductase, NO2- reductase, NO reductase, N2O reductase) that are necessary for the respiratory reduction of NO3- to N2 (Table 1). Genes for respiratory NO reductases were restricted to the presence of the quinol-dependent type (qnorB), but not of the cytochrome c-dependent type (cnorB).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Denitrification in dental plaque. Dental plaque of three individuals was suspended in aerobic mineral medium buffered at pH 7.2 containing 2% sucrose and 50 μM Na15NO3. Formation of (a) 30N2 (in μM/mg protein) and (b) apparent O2 concentrations (in μM) were measured in a time series experiment. Each symbol type represents 30N2 and O2 measurements of dental plaque incubations from one individual. Control measurements were done in the absence of Na15NO3 (open symbols).

Table 1

Denitrification genes in dental biofilms of five volunteers

Volunteer

NO3- reductase

NO2- reductase

NO reductase

N2O reductase

 

narG

nirS

nirK

cnorB

qnorB

nosZ

A

+

+

+

-

+

+

B

+

+

+

-

+

+

C

+

+

+

-

+

+

D

+

-

+

-

+

+

E

+

NA

NA

-

+

NA

Results are based on detection of a PCR product with the expected size or on the additional analysis of the sequence of the PCR product.

NA = not analysed.

Two lines of evidence suggested that denitrification in dental biofilms occurred under aerobic conditions. First, we observed 30N2 production from plaque that was suspended in air-saturated medium amended with 50 μM 15NO3- (Figure 1a). O2 measurements in this medium showed that aerobic heterotrophic respiration did not lead to anoxic conditions during the incubation period (Figure 1b). Second, microsensor measurements showed that NO3- was consumed in the presence of O2 and that also the denitrification intermediates NO and N2O were formed in the presence of O2 (Figure 2a-d). At this low NO3- concentration it is conceivable that all NO3- was used for assimilation into biomass, and was thus not available for respiratory denitrification. However, in this plaque sample NO3- was not completely consumed (that is, NO3- was not limiting) when present at a concentration of 50 μM NO3- (Figure 2a). Thus, NO3- assimilation and denitrification must have been already present at their maximum capacity at 50 μM NO3-. Further increases of the NO3- concentration to 760 μM will most likely not change the contribution of both pathways to the total NO3- uptake. In turn, the biofilm remained oxic when subjected to 760 μM NO3- and produced the denitrification intermediates NO and N2O (Figure 2f-h) indicating that aerobic denitrification was also active at high NO3- concentrations.
Figure 2
Figure 2

In situ detection of metabolic activity and microenvironmental conditions in a dental biofilm outside the mouth. Microsensors were used to measure concentration profiles of NO3-, O2, NO, N2O and pH in dental plaque. The medium contained a non-buffered mineral mix and 2% sucrose. The upper panels (a-d) show measurements with 50 μM NaNO3 (open red symbols) in the overlying medium. The lower panels (e-h) show measurements in the absence of NaNO3 (black symbols) and in the presence of 760 μM NaNO3 (red and green symbols). Measurements depicted by the green symbols were performed in the presence of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) and 760 μM NaNO3. The horizontal line represents the biofilm surface. Measurements were done in the same sample spot and thus are directly comparable.

Chemical and biological NO and N2O formation during plaque denitrification is pH dependent

NO3- was the source for NO and N2O in dental biofilms. This was shown by NO and N2O formation being restricted to the presence of NO3- (Figure 2g, h). NO formation in dental biofilms was mediated by both biological NO2- reduction and presumably acidic decomposition of NO2-. Biological NO2- reduction was the sole process that produced NO when the medium was buffered at approximately pH 7. In non-buffered medium, bacterial activity decreased biofilm pH < 5 (Figure 2e) and depth-averaged NO concentrations increased from 0.08 to 0.15 μM (Figure 2g). Titration of 50 μM NO2- to a buffer at pH 4.7 showed that acidic decomposition of NO2- caused chemical formation of approximately 0.05 μM NO (Figure 3), which is in the same range than the observed increase in the biofilm at pH < 5. It is already known that plaque can form NO2- by NO3- reduction [17]. NO2- can also naturally accumulate in saliva to concentrations of 50 μM and higher (data not shown, and [18]). Taken together, this suggests that acidic decomposition of NO2- contributes to NO formation at low plaque pH levels, while biological NO formation may still occur in parallel.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Chemical formation of NO by acidic decomposition of NO 2 - . NO formation was measured with a NO microsensor during titration of increasing NO2- concentrations in different solutions of phosphate-buffered saline at varying pH.

The absolute increase of NO due to acidic conditions was small from the perspective of the metabolic homeostasis of denitrification. This was evident because depth-averaged increases of N2O, the product of NO reduction, were approximately two orders of magnitude higher than those of NO concentrations under acidic conditions. This suggests that biofilm bacteria efficiently convert most NO to N2O and thereby keep the steady-state concentration of cytotoxic NO low, as has been also observed in environmental biofilms [13].

NO formation decreases O2uptake of dental plaque

Oxygen uptake in the presence of NO3- was higher at neutral pH than under acidic conditions (Figure 2e, f). The O2 profiles showed that the flux of O2 decreased by 50%, namely from -105 nmol/cm2/h under buffered conditions to -43 nmol/cm2/h under non-buffered conditions. Acidic pH alone did not lead to reduced O2 uptake when NO3- was absent, as the O2 flux was -143 nmol/cm2/h. Decreased bacterial O2 consumption might result from direct toxic effects of the highest NO concentration (0.15 to 0.2 μM), such as binding of NO to terminal, respiratory O2 reductases [29]. However, the absolute increase from 0.08 to 0.2 μM may not affect respiration as concentrations above 0.8 μM were previously shown to be necessary to inhibit O2 reduction in Escherichia coli [30]. In addition, instead of facilitating O2 reduction, a small fraction of electrons might be used preferentially for detoxification of NO by reduction to N2O, contributing to increased N2O concentrations and inhibited O2 uptake (Figure 2f, h).

N2O production in the human mouth is dependent on salivary NO3-and on the presence of dental plaque

We incubated air in the human mouth ('mouth air') and measured the rate of N2O accumulation to quantify the in vivo significance of denitrification in the oral habitat. We related N2O accumulation in mouth air to the presence of dental biofilms and salivary NO3-/NO2- concentrations (Figure 4). N2O accumulation in the presence of dental plaque varied strongly between the subjects and ranged from 11 to 443 nmol/h. N2O accumulation between subjects increased with increasing salivary NO3-/NO2- concentrations (Figure 4a). Drinking 200 ml beetroot juice that contained 12 mmol/l NO3- increased the salivary NO3-/NO2- concentrations, which led to an increase of between 3.8 and 9.1 fold in the rate of oral N2O accumulation.
Figure 4
Figure 4

N 2 O formation in the human mouth is dependent on salivary NO 2 - /NO 3 - concentrations and the presence of dental plaque. (a) Correlation of oral N2O production and salivary NO2-/NO3- concentration in 15 volunteers with unbrushed teeth. Each data point represents the rate of oral N2O accumulation of one individual on a certain day (black circles). Some volunteers were sampled on more than 1 day resulting in 19 data points in total. Four volunteers were additionally sampled before and after drinking NO3--rich beetroot juice to increase salivary NO2-/NO3- concentration and oral N2O accumulation (white circles connected by dotted line). (b) Effect of oral hygiene on N2O accumulation rate in the mouth. Oral N2O accumulation rate of individuals before tooth brushing plotted against the N2O accumulation rate after tooth brushing (closed circles). In six individuals an antiseptic mouth rinse that affects bacteria in the entire oral cavity was applied after tooth brushing (open circles, each of the six individuals is represented by a unique colour). For example, an individual (dark green) with an oral N2O accumulation rate of 500 nmol/h reduced the rate to 290 nmol/h by tooth brushing. Subsequent application of a mouth rinse resulted in a rate of 110 nmol/h. The dashed line corresponds to the absence of an effect of oral hygiene on the oral N2O accumulation. The error bars indicate the standard error of five replicate measurements of the oral N2O accumulation rate.

Dental biofilms were the main sites of N2O production in the human mouth. This was evident because the combined application of ordinary tooth brushing with an antiseptic mouthwash decreased oral N2O accumulation rate by 82%, while tooth brushing alone decreased the rate of oral N2O accumulation by 62% (Figure 4b).

Discussion

Our data show unambiguously that denitrification is a relevant process in a human associated microbial community. Until now, it was assumed that complete NO3- reduction in humans is restricted to the dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), because most bacterial isolates from humans are able to perform this reaction [7, 31]. DNRA is known to be a strictly anaerobic process that is favoured over denitrification in anaerobic, reduced environments [32]. Accordingly, DNRA might prevail in the reduced, anaerobic environment of the human gut, while denitrification is present in the more oxidised dental plaque. In turn, it is conceivable that DNRA is present in plaque that is recalcitrant to removal and thus, constantly anoxic and more reduced. Theoretically, in such biofilms NO2- reduction might be coupled to the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium (anammox) (Figure 5, black dotted lines), especially if protein degradation of host tissue or DNRA could provide a source for ammonium, as has been reported in marine open water habitats [33]. Denitrification, however, might be present in other oxidised environments in humans where bacteria and NO3- co-occur. For example, NO3- is also present in other body fluids than saliva that may provide a rather oxidised environment (for example, blood 20 to 40 μM and urine approximately 500 μM) [8]. Thus, denitrification might be relevant in microbial biofilms that are associated to other diseased or healthy sites, such as cystic fibrosis lungs, otitis media ears, implants, catheters and vaginal mucosa [34].
Figure 5
Figure 5

Microbial conversions of salivary NO 3 - in human dental plaque and its possible consequences. Grey lines show pathways that have been reported previously. Dotted lines show potential pathways that have not been reported to occur in dental plaque in this or other studies. Coloured lines show pathways that are suggested to occur by this study. Green lines show biologically-mediated pathways and red lines show chemically-mediated or physically-mediated pathways. Genes encoding for enzymes that mediate individual steps of denitrification are depicted if detected in dental biofilms via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genes of the cytochrome c-dependent NO reductase (cNorB) were not detected. Anammox = anaerobic oxidation of ammonium; DNRA = dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium.

Denitrification and DNRA are fundamentally different with respect to their final products, metabolic controls and released intermediates resulting in different effects on host physiology. Ammonium, the final product of DNRA, is available to host cells and associated microbes as a form of fixed nitrogen. Moreover, DNRA in humans may accumulate ammonium to detrimental concentrations [35]. In contrast, N2, the final product of denitrification, represents a loss of fixed nitrogen from the host and does not affect human cells. Furthermore, production of the signalling molecule NO by microbial denitrification might shape the interactions between the host cells and their associated microbial community.

Interestingly, denitrification in dental biofilms occurred under aerobic conditions. This shows that dental plaque does not necessarily have to display anoxic microsites for denitrification to occur. The ability to denitrify in the presence of O2 has been observed for isolated bacterial strains and occasionally for microbial communities [36, 37]. Aerobic denitrification guarantees a stable electron accepting process in a NO3--rich habitat exposed to frequent fluctuations in O2 concentration without energy-demanding expression of new enzyme systems [38]. This may perfectly apply to the oral habitat that is characterised by high salivary NO3- and potentially fluctuating O2 concentrations in the mouth.

Despite the microbial diversity of dental biofilms [16], we could only detect genes for respiratory NO reductases of the quinol-dependent type (qnorB), but not of the cytochrome c-dependent type (cnorB). Interestingly, genes that code for qNorB are also found in non-denitrifying, pathogenic bacteria, where it contributes to NO detoxification, instead of respiratory electron transport [39]. Apparently, respiratory NO reduction is exclusively mediated by qNorB in the investigated dental biofilms. Additionally, qNorB might be used as a protective enzyme against toxic NO derived from host cells, acidic decomposition of NO2- and other biofilm bacteria.

Our results allowed us to formulate a mechanistic model for nitrogen conversions in dental plaque (Figure 5). First, reduction of salivary NO3- leads to the formation of NO2- [17], which is further denitrified to form the intermediates NO and N2O and finally N2 (Figure 5, green lines). The mechanistic model involves a pH-controlled chemical conversion step from NO2- to NO in addition to the biological conversion step (Figure 5, red line). The chemical conversion of NO2- to NO occurs if acid fermentation decreases plaque pH < 5. High turnover of NO under acidic conditions leads to decreased O2 uptake in dental biofilms. This argues toward an NO-mediated metabolic coupling of different microbial activities in dental plaque. Moreover, bacteria respond to NO as a signalling molecule. Specifically, NO is involved in the dispersal of bacteria from biofilms [40]. Together this makes NO a possible bacterially-derived factor that balances the development of a natural dental plaque community. Thus, NO might be an important factor from the perspective of the 'ecological plaque hypothesis', which states that environmental factors (for example, pH and salivary NO3-) in the mouth determine if the dental plaque microbial community is dominated by either health-sustaining or disease-causing micro-organisms [41].

Human cells can produce NO from arginine by NO synthase activity and respond to NO as a signal molecule produced by other cells [26]. In gingival tissue, NO is known to be involved in blood pressure regulation and in inflammatory processes, such as those in periodontal diseases [24, 27]. Under acidic conditions, the depth-averaged NO concentration in dental plaque increased from 0.08 to 0.15 μM (Figure 2g), which is in a physiological effective range [42, 43] for local blood pressure regulation, neurosignalling events and immune system modulation in tissues close to plaque. Hence, we hypothesise that pH fluctuations and plaque denitrification may locally affect blood flow, signalling between nerves, and inflammatory processes in the gum by modulating the concentration of NO (Figure 5, green line). NO-mediated interactions will be different in cariogenic as compared to periodontal plaque, because both are characterised by distinct pH regimes [41]. While low pH levels in cariogenic plaque may induce chemical NO formation leading to high NO concentrations, NO formation in periodontal plaque will be restricted to microbial processes, because it is characterised by pH levels > 7. As discussed above, microbial denitrification might be relevant in other healthy and diseased sites of the body. Thus more generally, microbial denitrification might be considered an alternative route for NO formation in humans and provides a basis for symbiotic interactions between human-associated microbes and adjacent host cells.

The presence of dental plaque caused accumulation of N2O, as an intermediate of denitrification, in mouth air depending on salivary NO3- concentrations. This demonstrates that denitrification occurs in vivo and that dietary NO3--uptake influences plaque denitrification. The average rate of oral N2O emission from 15 volunteers with unbrushed teeth and non-manipulated salivary NO3-/NO2- concentrations was 80 nmol/h. While earlier investigations of the breath air of human beings revealed N2O concentrations above the ambient atmospheric level [44–46], our study presents the first oral-associated emission rates of this greenhouse gas [47] by humans. Extrapolating our data to the world population of currently 6.7 billion people, oral-associated N2O emission by humans is 0.00013 Tg N/a, representing an insignificant amount of 0.0008% of the total, annual N2O emission of 16.4 Tg N/a to the atmosphere [48].

Dental biofilms were the main sites of N2O production in the human mouth. This result and the microsensor data strongly suggest that dental plaque is also the main site for oral formation of the other denitrification intermediates NO2- and NO. Thus, NO2- measurements in saliva [20, 21] are not an adequate proxy for NO formation by human host cells in the mouth (Figure 5). Moreover, plaque denitrification needs to be considered when using NO and NO2- measurements in breath and saliva to diagnose systemic diseases, such as renal failure [49, 50] and cystic fibrosis [51]. More generally, the importance of dental plaque for the formation of denitrification intermediates as compared to other oral surfaces indicates that plaque bacteria are as important for oral nitrogen conversions than bacteria located on other oral surfaces [17]. Consequently, dental biofilms and salivary NO3- concentrations play a crucial role in the regulation of body NO2- concentration and affect NO2--related physiological functions in the human body, such as hypoxic vasodilatation and antimicrobial activity in the acidic stomach (Figure 5, grey lines) [8].

Numerous anatomical sites, including the skin, mouth, stomach, colon, and vagina, are inhabited by distinct microbial communities, which are characterised by a large diversity. This suggests a versatile potential of different metabolic pathways mediated by micro-organisms that affect human physiology. However, activities or the functional potentials of complex human-associated microbial communities have rarely been investigated [1]. Thus, we anticipate that investigations of human-associated microbial communities with techniques that measure their in situ activities will lead to the discovery of unexpected functions and interactions between microbes and humans if expanded to elemental cycles of carbon, sulfur, iron and others. The microbial ecology toolbox available for these experiments comprises techniques, such as microsensors, and isotopic or radioactive labelling with detection in bulk medium and on a single cell level, all of which can be combined with phylogenetic identification [52–55]. This ecophysiological approach will allow the direct testing of hypotheses that emerge from metagenomic data that is generated in the context of the human microbiome project [56].

Conclusions

Human dental plaque mediates denitrification based on salivary NO3-. Plaque denitrification is performed under aerobic conditions and leads to biological and chemical NO and N2O formation in a pH-dependent manner. Plaque O2 uptake is inhibited by NO. Thus, formation of NO mediates metabolic interactions between plaque bacteria. Moreover, NO is produced at concentration levels that allow signalling to human host cells, pointing toward a significant role in the regulation of inflammatory disorders of gum tissue (that is, periodontal diseases). Microbial denitrification is, besides NO synthase activity and acidic decomposition of NO2-, an alternative pathway of NO formation in humans. Denitrification in dental plaque is a relevant site for production of intermediates of nitrogen cycling in the human mouth and is dependent on salivary NO3-. Thus, breath analysis for the detection of systemic diseases should consider plaque activity, and denitrification in dental plaque may affect the physiology of the whole human body.

Methods

Samples

Samples of natural, dental plaque were obtained with toothpicks or dental floss from male and female volunteers (25 to 52 years in age), who had not taken antibiotics, and not being diagnosed as having periodontitis and/or other severe diseases. Experiments involving human samples were approved by the Federal Dentists Chamber Bremen (Landeszahnärztekammer Bremen, Germany) and all volunteers gave their written consent.

N2 production from isotopically-labelled NO3-

Dental biofilms were collected with a toothpick from dental surfaces and interproximal (IP) spaces of three volunteers and were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2). The protein content of the sample was determined after Lowry [57]. Biofilms were homogenised by vortexing, the material of each individual was equally distributed to three exetainers (3.8 ml) and filled with air saturated incubation medium (phosphate buffered saline and 2% sucrose). The incubation was immediately started by adding 50 μM Na15NO3 and was performed under continuous mixing at 37°C. Dissolved O2 concentration was measured with an O2 microsensor, directly before biological reactions were stopped by adding ZnCl2 to a final concentration of 0.5% at three time points (t0 = 0 h; t1 = 3.5 h; t2 = 5 h). A quadrupole mass spectrometer (GAM 200, IP Instruments, Bremen, Germany) was used to measure 30N2 after introducing a 2 ml helium headspace into the closed exetainer and equilibration between the liquid and gas phase.

Microsensor measurements

Plaque from two volunteers was subjected to in situ measurements with NO, N2O, O2, pH and NO3- microsensors outside the mouth. Biofilms were carefully recovered with toothpicks or dental floss from the IP spaces of the upper or lower molars by volunteers that did not brush their teeth for at least 24 h. Whole biofilm pieces were placed on solid agar (1.5%), fixed with a drop of molten agar (0.5%) and covered with non-buffered sucrose/salt medium (68 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 3.6 mM CaCl2, 26.8 mM KCl, 2% sucrose; pH 6.6 to 7.2). Biofilms equilibrated for at least 20 min before the measurements, which were performed within 6 to 8 h after biofilm retrieval. Manufacturing of amperometric NO, N2O and O2, and ion-selective pH and NO3- microsensors [28, 58–60] and microsensor measurements [28] were conducted as previously described. Steady state microprofiles were measured before and after 760 μM NaNO3 was added, while an air jet directed on the medium surface created a constant flow regime above the biofilm. To investigate nitrogen cycling at pH 6 to 7 in the biofilm the medium was supplemented with phosphate buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.2; resembling the concentration in 1 × PBS), thereby excluding chemical NO2- reduction. To increase sensor performance, NO3- microprofiles were measured in medium with lower salt content, and in the presence and absence of 50 μM NaNO3, instead of 760 μM. All presented measurements were performed in the same biofilm spot. Thus, the measurements are suitable to draw mechanistic conclusions. However, the data do not account for biofilm heterogeneity and are not suitable for calculation of average fluxes over a given biofilm surface. We repeated the same experiment with a biofilm from a second individual, which essentially showed the same treatment effects (see Additional file 1, Figure S1 and supplementary discussion).

Molecular analysis of denitrification genes from dental biofilms

Dental plaque was collected from dental surfaces and IP spaces with sterile toothpicks by five volunteers that had not brushed their teeth or eaten for 12 h. DNA was extracted according to a protocol optimised for dental plaque [61]. PCR amplification of partial sequences of the denitrification genes narG, nirS, nirK, cnorB, qnorB, and nosZ was performed in a total volume of 20 μl containing 2 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 250 μM of each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, 1 U of Taq polymerase (5 Prime GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), 0.3 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5 μM of each primer and 10 to 100 ng DNA. Published primers that target a wide spectrum of denitrification genes from different organisms were used and PCR experiments were performed as described in the corresponding protocols with some modifications (Additional file 1, Table S1). Amplicons were analysed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and subsequent ethidium bromide staining. For 11 out of 22 amplicons with the expected size clone libraries were constructed and sequenced to confirm that PCR products corresponded to the targeted genes. Amplicons were purified with the QIAQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and cloned using the TOPO TA cloning system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The obtained sequences were analysed with BLAST http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Only 1 of the 11 clone libraries did not contain the targeted gene (nirS, subject D).

N2O accumulation in mouth air

A total of 15 volunteers (25 to 52 years in age) were asked not to brush their teeth the night and morning before the measurement. They were allowed to eat and drink, but not during the last hour before the measurements. To exclusively measure N2O that is produced in the mouth, but not in the lung or the stomach, we injected ambient air (30 ml) into the empty mouth. Subsequently, volunteers were asked to breathe through the nose with the mouth closed off from the nasopharynx and keep the injected air in their mouth. We defined this air as mouth air in which orally-produced N2O accumulated. Two gas samples (1 ml) were withdrawn through the blunt canula of a syringe after 30 and 90 s and filled into gas-tight exetainers (3 ml). This sampling scheme was repeated five times with teeth unbrushed and five times with teeth brushed by the volunteers. The N2O accumulation rate of seven volunteers was additionally measured after both teeth brushing and a 1-min antiseptic mouthwash that contains chlorhexidine, following the package insert (Chlorhexamed fluid, 0.1%, GlaxoSmithKline, Bühl, Germany). Before brushing the teeth, the volunteers collected 1 ml of saliva that was immediately frozen for later analysis of the NO3-/NO2- concentration. Subsamples of mouth air were analysed for N2O concentration using a gas chromatograph with a 63Ni electron capture detector (Agilent GC7890, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). From the concentration difference between 30 and 90 s and the incubated volume of air, the rate of N2O accumulation was calculated in nmol/individual/h. The increase of N2O concentration in mouth air was shown to be linear for at least 240 s in additional test runs.

In a separate experiment, the N2O accumulation rate of four volunteers with teeth unbrushed was determined before and 2 h after drinking 200 ml of beetroot juice that contained 12 mM NO3-. The volunteers collected 0.5 ml of saliva before and then hourly after drinking the beetroot juice for later analysis of the NO3-/NO2- concentration. Maximum salivary NO3- and NO2- concentrations were generally measured 2 h after drinking beetroot juice. Saliva samples were cleared by centrifugation and then analysed for NO3-/NO2- with the VCl3 reduction method [62] followed by NO measurement on a chemiluminescence detector (CLD 86, EcoPhysics, Duernten, Switzerland).

Data deposition

Sequences for the denitrification genes obtained in this study have been submitted to the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database under the accession numbers FN401446 to FN401486

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the volunteers for their participation in the experiments. We thank Angela Schramm for help in sample analysis. We thank Nicole Dubilier, Bo Barker Jørgensen, and Andreas Schramm for valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Max Planck Society and Philips Oral Healthcare.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Microsensor Research Group, Max-Planck-Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
(2)
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
(3)
Center for Genomic Sciences, Allegheny General Hospital/Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
(4)
National Centre for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS), School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

References

  1. Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA: An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature. 2007, 449 (7164): 811-818. 10.1038/nature06245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vianna ME, Holtgraewe S, Seyfarth I, Conrads G, Horz HP: Quantitative analysis of three hydrogenotrophic microbial groups, methanogenic archaea, sulfate-reducing bacteria, and acetogenic bacteria, within plaque biofilms associated with human periodontal disease. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190 (10): 3779-3785. 10.1128/JB.01861-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lepp PW, Brinig MM, Ouverney CC, Palm K, Armitage GC, Relman DA: Methanogenic Archaea and human periodontal disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (16): 6176-6181. 10.1073/pnas.0308766101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gibson GR, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT, Allison C, Segal I, Vorster HH, Walker ARP: Alternative Pathways for Hydrogen Disposal During Fermentation in the Human Colon. Gut. 1990, 31 (6): 679-683. 10.1136/gut.31.6.679.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Egert M, de Graaf AA, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Venema K: Beyond diversity: functional microbiomics of the human colon. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14 (2): 86-91. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zumft WG: Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997, 61 (4): 533-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Cole JA, Benjamin N: Opinion - Nitrate, bacteria and human health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2 (7): 593-602. 10.1038/nrmicro929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT: The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008, 7 (2): 156-167. 10.1038/nrd2466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Straub KL, Benz M, Schink B, Widdel F: Anaerobic, nitrate-dependent microbial oxidation of ferrous iron. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62 (4): 1458-1460.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumann B, Snozzi M, Zehnder AJB, vanderMeer JR: Dynamics of denitrification activity of Paracoccus denitrificans in continuous culture during aerobic-anaerobic changes. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (15): 4367-4374.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goretski J, Zafiriou OC, Hollocher TC: Steady-State Nitric-Oxide Concentrations During Denitrification. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265 (20): 11535-11538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrad R: Soil Microbial Processes and the Cycling of Atmospheric Trace Gases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A-Math Phys Eng Sci. 1995, 351 (1696): 219-230. 10.1098/rsta.1995.0030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Schreiber F, Loeffler B, Polerecky L, Kuypers MMM, de Beer D: Mechanisms of transient nitric oxide and nitrous oxide production in a complex biofilm. Isme J. 2009, 3 (11): 1301-1313. 10.1038/ismej.2009.55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stief P, Poulsen M, Nielsen LP, Brix H, Schramm A: Nitrous oxide emission by aquatic macrofauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (11): 4296-4300. 10.1073/pnas.0808228106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Horn MA, Schramm A, Drake HL: The earthworm gut: An ideal habitat for ingested N2O-producing microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69 (3): 1662-1669. 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1662-1669.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ: Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002, 66 (3): 486-10.1128/MMBR.66.3.486-505.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Doel JJ, Benjamin N, Hector MP, Rogers M, Allaker RP: Evaluation of bacterial nitrate reduction in the human oral cavity. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005, 113 (1): 14-19. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00184.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Duncan C, Dougall H, Johnston P, Green S, Brogan R, Leifert C, Smith L, Golden M, Benjamin N: Chemical Generation of Nitric-Oxide in the Mouth from the Enterosalivary Circulation of Dietary Nitrate. Nat Med. 1995, 1 (6): 546-551. 10.1038/nm0695-546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bayindir YZ, Polat MF, Seven N: Nitric oxide concentrations in saliva and dental plaque in relation to caries experience and oral hygiene. Caries Research. 2005, 39 (2): 130-133. 10.1159/000083158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Carossa S, Pera P, Doglio P, Lombardo S, Colagrande P, Brussino L, Rolla G, Bucca C: Oral nitric oxide during plaque deposition. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001, 31 (10): 876-879. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00902.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Aurer A, Aleksic J, Ivic-Kardum M, Aurer J, Culo F: Nitric oxide synthesis is decreased in periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2001, 28 (6): 565-568. 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028006565.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB: Dental caries. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9555): 51-59. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW: Periodontal diseases. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9499): 1809-1820. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendall HK, Marshall RI, Bartold PM: Nitric oxide and tissue destruction. Oral Dis. 2001, 7 (1): 2-10. 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2001.70102.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brennan PA, Thomas GJ, Langdon JD: The role of nitric oxide in oral diseases. Arch Oral Biol. 2003, 48 (2): 93-100. 10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00183-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bogdan C: Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2 (10): 907-916. 10.1038/ni1001-907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ugar-Cankal D, Ozmeric N: A multifaceted molecule, nitric oxide in oral and periodontal diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2006, 366 (1-2): 90-100. 10.1016/j.cca.2005.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schreiber F, Polerecky L, de Beer D: Nitric oxide microsensor for high spatial resolution measurements in biofilms and sediments. Anal Chem. 2008, 80 (4): 1152-1158. 10.1021/ac071563x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cooper CE: Nitric oxide and cytochrome oxidase: substrate, inhibitor or effector?. Trends BiochemSci. 2002, 27 (1): 33-39. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02035-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevanin TM, Ioannidis N, Mills CE, Kim SO, Hughes MN, Poole RK: Flavohemoglobin hmp affords inducible protection for Escherichia coli respiration, catalyzed by cytochromes bo ' or bd, from nitric oxide. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (46): 35868-35875. 10.1074/jbc.M002471200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Parham NJ, Gibson GR: Microbes involved in dissimilatory nitrate reduction in the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000, 31 (1): 21-28. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00667.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohan SB, Cole JA: The Dissimilatory Reduction of Nitrate to Ammonia by Anaerobic Bacteria. The Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle. Edited by: Bothe H, Ferguson SJ, Newton WE. 2007, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1Google Scholar
  33. Lam P, Lavik G, Jensen MM, Vossenberg van de J, Schmid M, Woebken D, Dimitri G, Amann R, Jetten MSM, Kuypers MMM: Revising the nitrogen cycle in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (12): 4752-4757. 10.1073/pnas.0812444106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P: Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2 (2): 95-108. 10.1038/nrmicro821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Visek WJ: Diet and Cell-Growth Modulation by Ammonia. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978, 31 (10): S216-S220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lloyd D: Aerobic Denitrification in Soils and Sediments - from Fallacies to Facts. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993, 8 (10): 352-356. 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90218-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gao H, Schreiber F, Collins G, Jensen MM, Kostka JE, Lavik G, de Beer D, Zhou H-y, Kuypers MMM: Aerobic denitrification in permeable Wadden Sea sediments. ISME J. 2009Google Scholar
  38. Robertson LA, Kuenen JG: Aerobic Denitrification - a Controversy Revived. Arch Microbiol. 1984, 139 (4): 351-354. 10.1007/BF00408378.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zumft WG: Nitric oxide reductases of prokaryotes with emphasis on the respiratory, heme-copper oxidase type. J Inorg Biochem. 2005, 99 (1): 194-215. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.09.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Barraud N, Hassett DJ, Hwang SH, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S, Webb JS: Involvement of nitric oxide in biofilm dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (21): 7344-7353. 10.1128/JB.00779-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Marsh PD: Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes?. Microbiology-(UK). 2003, 149: 279-294. 10.1099/mic.0.26082-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bedioui F, Villeneuve N: Electrochemical nitric oxide sensors for biological samples - Principle, selected examples and applications. Electroanalysis. 2003, 15 (1): 5-18. 10.1002/elan.200390006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Chen KJ, Pittman RN, Popel AS: Nitric oxide in the vasculature: Where does it come from and where does it go? A quantitative perspective. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008, 10 (7): 1185-1198. 10.1089/ars.2007.1959.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Russow R, Neue HU, Wolf I, Plath C: Humans as a source of N2O - Evidences from breath air analysis and N-15 tracer experiments. 3rd International Symposium on Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: Jan 21-23 2002; Maastricht, Netherlands. 2002, Millpress Science Publishers, 155-156.Google Scholar
  45. Mitsui T, Kondo T: Effects of mouth cleansing on the levels of exhaled nitrous oxide in young and older adults. Sci Total Environ. 1998, 224 (1-3): 177-180. 10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00353-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bleakley BH, Tiedje JM: Nitrous-Oxide Production by Organisms Other Than Nitrifiers or Denitrifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982, 44 (6): 1342-1348.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Crutzen PJ: Role of No and No2 in the Chemistry of the Troposphere and Stratosphere. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 1979, 7: 443-472. 10.1146/annurev.ea.07.050179.002303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. IPCC: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. IPCC Third Assessment Report Climate Change. 2001Google Scholar
  49. Rolla G, Bruno M, Bommarito L, Heffler E, Ferrero N, Petrarulo M, Bagnis C, Bugiani M, Guida G: Breath analysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: effect of haemodialysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008, 38 (10): 728-733. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02016.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Matsumoto A, Hirata Y, Kakoki M, Nagata D, Momomura S, Sugimoto T, Tagawa H, Omata M: Increased excretion of nitric oxide in exhaled air of patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Sci. 1999, 96 (1): 67-74. 10.1042/CS19980080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zetterquist W, Marteus H, Kalm-Stephens P, Nas E, Nordvall L, Johannesson M, Alving K: Oral bacteria - The missing link to ambiguous findings of exhaled nitrogen oxides in cystic fibrosis. Respir Med. 2009, 103 (2): 187-193. 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.09.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee N, Nielsen PH, Andreasen KH, Juretschko S, Nielsen JL, Schleifer KH, Wagner M: Combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization and microautoradiography - a new tool for structure-function analyses in microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65 (3): 1289-1297.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Behrens S, Losekann T, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Ng WO, Stevenson BS, Hutcheon ID, Relman DA, Spormann AM: Linking microbial phylogeny to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (10): 3143-3150. 10.1128/AEM.00191-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schramm A: In situ analysis of structure and activity of the nitrifying community in biofilms, aggregates, and sediments. Geomicrobiol J. 2003, 20 (4): 313-333. 10.1080/01490450303893.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuypers MM, Jorgensen BB: The future of single-cell environmental microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2007, 9 (1): 6-7. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01222_5.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI: The Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2007, 449 (7164): 804-810. 10.1038/nature06244.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193 (1): 265-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Andersen K, Kjaer T, Revsbech NP: An oxygen insensitive microsensor for nitrous oxide. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2001, 81 (1): 42-48. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00924-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Revsbech NP: An Oxygen Microsensor with a Guard Cathode. Limnol Oceanogr. 1989, 34 (2): 474-478.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. deBeer D, Schramm A, Santegoeds CM, Kuhl M: A nitrite microsensor for profiling environmental biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63 (3): 973-977.Google Scholar
  61. Parrish KD, Greenberg EP: A Rapid Method for Extraction and Purification of DNA from Dental Plaque. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61 (11): 4120-4123.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Braman RS, Hendrix SA: Nanogram Nitrite and Nitrate Determination in Environmental and Biological-Materials by Vanadium(Iii) Reduction with Chemi-Luminescence Detection. Anal Chem. 1989, 61 (24): 2715-2718. 10.1021/ac00199a007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Schreiber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us