Skip to main content

Advertisement

Q&A: How does jasmonate signaling enable plants to adapt and survive?

BMC Biologyvolume 14, Article number: 79 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Jasmonates (JAs) are a class of plant hormones that play essential roles in response to tissue wounding. They act on gene expression to slow down growth and to redirect metabolism towards producing defense molecules and repairing damage. These responses are systemic and have dramatic impacts on yields, making JAs a very active research area. JAs interact with many other plant hormones and therefore also have essential functions throughout development, notably during plant reproduction, leaf senescence and in response to many biotic and abiotic stresses.

1. What are jasmonates?

Jasmonates (JAs) are a class of oxidized lipids (oxylipins) that derive from α-linolenic acids (α-LAs). The best-described bioactive JA is (+)-7-iso-Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile) [1] (Fig. 1). The biosynthetic pathway that produces JA-Ile (see Question 4, “How are JAs biosynthesized?”; Fig. 1) also leads to the production of several intermediates, such as cis(+)-oxophytodienoic acid (cis-OPDA), as well as secondary metabolites, for instance methyl jasmonate and cis-jasmone, that have important biological functions, some of which are independent of JA-Ile [2–6]. Studies on JAs frequently use coronatine (COR), which is an analogue of JA-Ile, because it can easily be produced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (Fig. 1). COR is a toxin which is used by the pathogen to divert plant defense responses [7, 8], though biotic defense is just one of JAs’ roles.

Fig. 1.
figure1

Biosynthesis of JAs and different types of bioactive JAs. Biosynthesis of JAs takes place in three different cellular compartments (chloroplast, peroxisome, and cytoplasm). Refer to Question 4 for further details. Coronatine (COR) is not synthesized by plants but by the bacteria Pseudomonas syringae (refer to Question 1 for details)

Full size image

2. When are JAs produced and what are their main functions?

JAs are produced in response to tissue damage, whether caused by necrotrophic pathogens, insects, herbivores, or mechanical stress. Interestingly, in response to a local stimuli (i.e., an insect bite) it is observed that tissues located distally from the bite also produce defense molecules [9]. The systemic effects of JAs are described in more detail in Question 11 (“How does the wound signal spread throughout the plant?”). It has been shown that JA signaling triggers genome-wide changes in gene expression [10] and defects in this pathway reduce plant fitness in the wild (reviewed in [11]). JAs are also produced during several developmental processes and one of the landmark phenotypes of JA insensitive or biosynthetic mutants in several plant species is male (e.g., Solanum lycopersicum) or female (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana) sterility, indicating an important function in fertility [12]. However, they were initially of interest due to their odorant properties.

3. When were JAs discovered and their role as hormones established?

In 1899 Hesse and Müller purified an unknown ketone from Jasminum grandiflorum essential oil extracts and called it jasmone [13]. Its chemical structure was solved in 1933 by Ruzicka and Pfeiffer [14]. However, purified jasmone, combined with other known compounds also isolated from Jasminum essential oil, didn’t have the characteristic scent of jasmine flowers, suggesting one or more constituents were missing. In 1962, methyl jasmonate was eventually isolated and its structure determined, and it was shown to be the missing odorant molecule [15]. It took another 20 years before biologists observed that JAs had effects on leaf senescence and seedling growth [16, 17]. The identification of the JA biosynthetic pathway was already almost complete in 1992 [18], while the first A. thaliana JA resistant mutant, coi1 (for CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1), was isolated in 1994 [19]. The gene was cloned in 1998 [20] and formally identified as the only (thus far) JA receptor 11 years later [21, 22].

4. How are JAs biosynthesized?

The JA biosynthetic pathway, also called the octadecanoids pathway (the starting point is the 18 C fatty acid α-linolenic acid 18:3 (α-LA)), takes place in three subcellular compartments: first in the chloroplast, then the peroxisome, and finally the cytoplasm (Fig. 1). The very first step consists in the release of α-LA from galacto- and phospholipids localized at the chloroplast membrane by the action of phospholipases (PLAs), which include DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE 1 (DAD1) in A. thaliana [23]. Subsequently, the oxidation of the polyunsaturated fatty acids α-LA by 13-LIPOXYGENASE (LOX) leads to 13-hydroperoxy-9,11,15-octadecatrienoicacid (13-HPOT) [24–26]. Two different enzyme families, termed ALLENE OXYDE SYNTHASE (AOS) and ALLENE OXYDE CYCLASE (AOC), successively convert 13-HPOT into the stable cis(+)-oxophytodienoic acid (cis-OPDA) intermediate [27–30]. The next steps of JA biosynthesis take place in the peroxisome. How cis-OPDA is addressed to this subcellular compartment is largely unknown. So far, only one gene, COMATOSE, a peroxisome-localized protein of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter class, has been linked with JA transport to this subcellular compartment [31, 32]. However, as loss of function mutants (in Arabidopsis) can still make some JA, there are most likely other transporters involved. In the peroxisome, cis-OPDA is reduced by an OPDA REDUCTASE (OPR) and then undergoes three rounds of β-oxydation by ACYL-CoA OXIDASE (ACX) enzymes leading to the production of jasmonic acid (JA) [33, 34]. JA is then exported though an unknown route to the cytoplasm where it can be modified by several enzymes (reviewed in [2]). The best described belongs to the class of GRETCHEN HAGEN 3 s (GH3s), which conjugates JA with various amino acids but most notably isoleucine, leading to the bioactive JA-Ile molecule [1, 35].

5. How is JA-Ile perceived by cells?

How plant cells sense JA-Ile has been well documented and is mechanistically very similar to auxin signaling (similarities are reviewed in [36]; Fig. 2). JA-Ile acts as a molecular glue between its co-receptors COI1, an F-BOX E3 LIGASE protein, and JASMONATE ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) proteins, which act as transcriptional repressors [21, 37, 38]. Most JAZ proteins share two conserved regions: a ZIM domain and a Jas motif [39]. While the ZIM domain mediates protein–protein interactions that regulate JA signal transduction, the Jas motif is involved in JA perception and signal transduction. The crystal structure of a COI1/JA-Ile/JAZ1 complex revealed that high affinity binding of JA-Ile requires a bipartite degron on the JAZ protein [21]. The degron, which encompasses the Jas motif, is a 20-amino acid sequence that is required to interact with COI1. The JAZ degron sequence consists of a conserved α-helix for COI1 docking and a loop region to trap the hormone in its binding pocket. Sheard and colleagues [21] also showed that inositol pentakisphosphate (InsP5) is a key component of the complex as it interacts with both COI1 and the JAZ degron adjacent to the hormone. Interestingly, it was also shown that the affinity of COI1 and JAZ co-receptors is higher for coronatine than JA-Ile. These structural studies were either predicted by molecular modeling [22] or confirmed in further papers [40]. Remarkably, all the structural data allowed for the rational design of novel antagonists of JA signaling [41], preventing the next step in JA signaling.

Fig. 2.
figure2

JA signaling. JA perception and signal transduction take place in the nucleus. Refer to Questions 5, 6, and 7 for details. Protein structures are not accurately depicted and structural features are not to scale. For JAZ proteins, the ZIM domain would be on the top right portion and the Jas motif on the bottom right. Homo/hetero-dimerization of the JAZ proteins is not represented for clarity. The site for JAZ protein polyubiquitination is not known

Full size image

6. What happens when JA-Ile binds its co-receptors?

As for perception, the canonical signaling pathway of JA-Ile is also remarkably similar to auxin [36]. The JA-Ile-dependent interaction between COI1 and JAZ proteins leads to JAZ degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) [37, 38, 42] (Fig. 2). Polyubiquitination of JAZ proteins has been indirectly observed using proteomic approaches [43–45] and their degradation is proteasome dependent as MG132 treatments stabilize them [38, 42]. The ZIM domain of the JAZ proteins notably controls their homo- or hetero-dimerization, which is essential for their function [46, 47]. The ZIM domain also controls the recruitment of TOPLESS (TPL) co-repressors through a protein termed NINJA (NOVEL INTERACTOR OF JAZ) [48]. The Jas motif confers JA sensitivity to JAZ proteins and also controls the interaction with target transcription factors (TFs; reviewed in [49]). Overall, the chain of events from perception to responses at the genomic level is achieved in three distinct steps: 1) JA-Ile is perceived by its co-receptor complex; 2) JAZ proteins are degraded by the proteasome; 3) downstream genes are activated through the release of specific TFs (Fig. 2).

7. How is the transcription of JA-Ile response genes regulated?

Amongst the many TFs that interact with JAZ proteins, the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TFs MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 have been studied extensively [50–52]. When JAZ proteins are stable (in the absence of JAs), genes downstream of promoters bound by MYCs are kept silent because of the recruitment of TPL via NINJA [48] (Fig. 2). Structural studies have revealed that, in this situation, the Jas motif of JAZ9 forms a complete α-helix that triggers a conformational change at the N-terminal side of MYC3. This interaction, which is structurally different than that between JAZs and COI1, inhibits the recruitment of the MED25 subunit of the mediator complex. Upon release of TPL repression after the degradation of JAZ proteins, MYC3 TFs recruit the MEDIATOR complex to trigger transcription of downstream genes by the RNA pol II [53, 54]. JAZ proteins interact with other types of TFs (reviewed in [49]) and it will be interesting to see whether the repression mechanisms are conserved. Altogether, the two mechanisms described, namely epigenetic silencing by TPL and direct repression of RNA pol II recruitment by JAZs, ensure that JA-responsive genes regulated by MYC TFs are kept silent in unstressed conditions [54] (Fig. 2).

8. What are the genes downstream of JA signaling and how do they enable plants to adapt and survive?

The transcriptional changes induced by JAs on their own, for instance in response to methyl jasmonate in cell culture, will primarily affect genes involved in JA signaling (JAZs, MYC2) and in second wave genes involved in metabolism and cell cycle progression [55]. Noir et al. [56] reported that JAs restrain leaf growth by inhibiting G1/S transition, thereby reducing cell number, and by repressing the onset of endoreduplication, which consequently affects cell size. These effects are clearly visible in plants mechanically wounded several times, which display a dwarf phenotype also termed the “bonsai effect” (Fig. 3) [57]. The reduction in growth is not limited to direct effects on cell cycle and cell expansion but is also due to cross-talk between JAs and gibberellins (GAs) [58, 59].

Fig. 3
figure3

Phenotypes of plants treated with JAs. Plants treated with methyl jasmonate display a dwarf phenotype also called the ‘bonsai effect’. Methyl jasmonate does not seem to be bioactive by itself but is converted to the bioactive JA-Ile in planta

Full size image

JAs are also important during the responses to pathogens and herbivores. In these situations, wounding is associated with herbivory- or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (H/P AMPS) [60]. These completely change the transcriptomic landscape, allowing plants to respond specifically to various stresses, which increases fitness [10, 61–63].

One of the key effects reported in several studies is the “priming” of JA signaling and, more generally, stress responses [64]. Also called “stress memory” [65, 66], it is the basis of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in plants [67]. The basic idea is that plants exposed to various types of biotic and abiotic stresses will be able to respond faster and more efficiently to future stresses (recent reports include [68, 69]). Important classes of molecules that prime crop defenses (elicitors) include herbivore-induced plant volatiles [70, 71] but also inorganic elements such as silicon [72]. These notably require JA signaling and allow plants to adapt and survive in a challenging environment.

9. Do JAs signal through pathways other than the canonical COI1-JAZ?

Several reports clearly suggest JAs might signal through at least one other pathway that is independent of COI1 and that involves the biosynthetic intermediate OPDA (reviewed in [2]). For instance, transcriptomic studies have revealed that several genes are regulated by OPDA, but in a COI1-independent manner [4]. These notably provide a mechanistic explanation for the observation that OPDA but not JA-Ile is involved in basal defense of tomato plants against Botrytis [73]. In terms of evolution, it has been shown that the moss Physcomitrella patens, which does not produce JA-Ile but accumulates OPDA, has reduced fertility in aoc mutants, a phenotype that is associated with JAs in higher plants [74]. Besides OPDA, other JA metabolites have COI1-independent roles, for instance, cis jasmone [3] and O glucosylated forms of JA [75]. More generally, other classes of oxylipins, which are not JAs but also derive from α-LA, participate in defense responses but also regulate developmental processes such as root growth and root branching [76]. In the near future, the identification of a receptor/receptors or signaling components will be necessary to provide a molecular basis for these observations.

10. How is signaling via JAs switched off?

Inactivation of JA signaling takes place at least at two different levels. First, in response to JA treatments or wounding, JAZ repressors are amongst the first genes to be induced [37]. This induction provides a negative feedback loop that aims at switching off JA responses rapidly. Second, inactivation of the bioactive JA-Ile can be achieved either by hydroxylation (12-OH-JA-Ile) and/or carboxylation (12-COOH-JA-Ile) of JA-Ile [77–79] or by the hydrolysis of Ile from JA [80, 81]. The catabolism of JA-Ile in 12-OH-JA-Ile and 12-COOH-JA-Ile occurs relatively fast, as high amounts of these two metabolites can be measured 90 min after wounding a leaf in Arabidopsis [82]. Interestingly, the genes involved in inactivation of JA signaling, CYP94B1, B3, and C1, are themselves induced by wounding and jasmonates [83]. The hydrolysis of JA-Ile was shown to be mediated by two amido hydrolases in Arabidopsis, ILL6 and IAR3, and by an IAR3 homologous gene in Nicotiana attenuata, NaJIH1 [80, 81]. Strikingly, plants silenced for NaJIH1 had increased resistance to insects, clearly suggesting an important biological function for this protein in protection.

11. How does the wound signal spread throughout the plant?

The first report of systemic wound responses in plants was in 1972 from the laboratory of Clarence Ryan [9]. The authors demonstrated that beetle feeding or mechanical wounding of tomato or potato plants triggers the accumulation of high amounts of protease inhibitors (PIs) in not only wounded but also unwounded leaves. It was proposed that PIs function to repel insects from eating the plant and were therefore a defense mechanism. Twenty years later, JAs were shown to be the inductive signal triggering the production of PIs [6, 84]. However, how the wound signal is triggered and how fast it is transported to different parts of a plant in the absence of a nervous system only began to be understood much later.

The actual dynamics of the phenomenon were described using very sensitive detection methods, which showed that the spread of the wound response signal moves at a speed of 3.4–4.5 cm.min−1 as measured by the production of JA distally to the wounding site (~0.1 cm.s−1) [85]. This is two orders of magnitude slower than the conduction velocity of neurons involved in nociception in humans (~3–30 m.s−1) [86]. There is evidence that JAs can be transported through vascular tissues in response to wounding [87], which is referred to as the cell non-autonomous pathway [88]. Measurements made using mutants and radiolabeled JA-Ile showed that this is unlikely to involve transport of JA-Ile or OPDA. The cell-autonomous pathway, on the other hand, implies that a signal which is not JA triggers JA production distally, for instance, via electrical signals [89] or hydraulic movements [90]. In 2013 Mousavi and colleagues showed that GLUTAMATE LIKE RECEPTOR genes (GLRs) are essential for the systemic response in Arabidopsis [91]. The authors showed that wound activated surface potentials (WASPs) were detected in leaf-to-leaf wound signal transmission and that these were essential to trigger wound responses in distal leaves. The speed at which the signal is transmitted fits with previous observations (5 cm.min−1).

More recently, using a fluorescent biosensor to monitor JA responses after wounding, it was shown that systemic signaling from shoots to roots after wounding takes places in two successive waves [42]. The first wave is rapid (<5 min) and triggers a slight degradation of JAZ proteins. The second wave is slower (>30 min) and triggers a much stronger reduction in JAZ proteins. In this experimental set-up, the velocity at which the first wave is transmitted is in a similar range as previously described (≥1 cm/min). Other studies using an output reporter of JA signaling (the promoter of JAZ10) have shown that long distance shoot to root wound signaling is transmitted through the vasculature and then is radially transmitted to the outer tissues [52, 92]. Importantly, the question of whether WASPS are the only systemic signal remains open. Nevertheless, it is clear that these systemic responses are essential to allow plants to survive in the wild, notably by triggering the production of defense molecules and by priming defense responses [9].

12. To what extent do JAs affect crop yields and how can we reduce their effects?

Overall, estimates on the proportion of crop losses due to biotic and abiotic stresses range from 20 to 40 % of global yields [93, 94]. Within their natural environments, crops are challenged by a combination of stresses that occur simultaneously or sequentially [62]. In order to understand better how crops cope with such stresses and to find solutions to reduce crop losses, there is a clear need for more integrative analyses that combine multiple stresses (most recent examples include [63, 64]). In addition, repeated wounding has been shown to be required in order to impact root growth in Arabidopsis seedlings [52]. Repetitive stresses are frequent and studies looking at the impact of these in relation to the developmental stages of the plants are needed.

13. What are the main avenues of research on JAs?

Our understanding of JA biosynthesis, perception, signaling, and catabolism have progressed considerably over the past 10 years. There are now plenty of transcriptomics datasets from different plant species in response to various stresses available online. From these, several genes have been identified that could potentially be interesting for plant breeders as they might enhance resistance to pathogens and resilience to unfavorable weather. Fundamental research now needs to focus on understanding how plants integrate various types of stresses and how they prioritize their responses as in a real life situation crops will typically not face a single, isolated stress but a combination of stresses that might occur sequentially or at the same time. Publications in this area are more and more frequent and the next few years should see these numbers grow even more.

Also, despite the clear evidence that other pathways exist in parallel to the canonical COI1-JAZ module, there are still no molecular mechanisms to explain how these work in planta. Transcriptomic studies, as well as evo/devo analyses of JAs signaling in plants, might give a hint, especially since the JA biosynthetic pathway appeared progressively during evolution. Importantly, the identification of stress-specific signaling pathways will allow for the development of biosensors that will help plant growers to monitor their crops more precisely and provide accurate information for when treatments are required to reduce losses.

Finally, further research is required on the transmission of the systemic signal. Are there GLR genes in other plant species that fulfill the same function? Can these be used by crop breeders to select for crops less susceptible to wounding and other stresses? It will be essential to dissect these research areas further for the agriculture of tomorrow.

14. Where can I found out more?

There are many reviews that cover all the aspects of JAs, from biosynthesis, signaling, and catabolism to biological function. The most recent contributions include [2, 45, 95, 96]. The review by Claus Wasternack and Bettina Hause [12] and the more general review on the roles of plant hormones in defense responses [67] are the most cited papers in the field of JAs with over 70 citations per year (Web Of Science, search for “jasmonates” as topic, refined to “reviews”).

References

  1. 1.

    Fonseca S, Chini A, Hamberg M, Adie B, Porzel A, Kramell R, et al. (+)-7-iso-Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine is the endogenous bioactive jasmonate. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:344–50.

  2. 2.

    Wasternack C, Strnad M. Jasmonate signaling in plant stress responses and development - active and inactive compounds. New Biotechnol. 2016;33:604–13.

  3. 3.

    Matthes MC, Bruce TJA, Ton J, Verrier PJ, Pickett JA, Napier JA. The transcriptome of cis-jasmone-induced resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana and its role in indirect defence. Planta. 2010;232:1163–80.

  4. 4.

    Taki N, Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Obayashi T, Kikuta A, Kobayashi K, Ainai T, et al. 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid triggers expression of a distinct set of genes and plays a role in wound-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:1268–83.

  5. 5.

    Heitz T, Smirnova E, Widemann E, Aubert Y, Pinot F, Ménard R. The rise and fall of jasmonate biological activities. Subcell Biochem. 2016;86:405–26.

  6. 6.

    Farmer EE, Ryan CA. Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:7713–6.

  7. 7.

    Weiler EW, Kutchan TM, Gorba T, Brodschelm W, Niesel U, Bublitz F. The Pseudomonas phytotoxin coronatine mimics octadecanoid signalling molecules of higher plants. FEBS Lett. 1994;345:9–13.

  8. 8.

    Melotto M, Underwood W, Koczan J, Nomura K, He SY. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell. 2006;126:969–80.

  9. 9.

    Green TR, Ryan CA. Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science. 1972;175:776–7.

  10. 10.

    Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2000;12:707–20.

  11. 11.

    Erb M, Glauser G, Robert CAM. Induced immunity against belowground insect herbivores- activation of defenses in the absence of a jasmonate burst. J Chem Ecol. 2012;38:629–40.

  12. 12.

    Wasternack C, Hause B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot. 2013;111:1021–58.

  13. 13.

    Hesse A, Müller F. Ueber ätherisches Jasminblüthenöl. I. Berichte Dtsch. Chem Ges. 1899;32:565–74.

  14. 14.

    Ruzicka L, Über PM, Jasminriechstoffe I. Die Konstitution des Jasmons. Helv Chim Acta. 1933;16:1208–14.

  15. 15.

    Demole E, Lederer E, Mercier D. Isolement et détermination de la structure du jasmonate de méthyle, constituant odorant caractéristique de l’essence de jasmin. Helv Chim Acta. 1962;45:675–85.

  16. 16.

    Ueda J, Kato J. Isolation and identification of a senescence-promoting substance from wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.). Plant Physiol. 1980;66:246–9.

  17. 17.

    Dathe W, Rönsch H, Preiss A, Schade W, Sembdner G, Schreiber K. Endogenous plant hormones of the broad bean, Vicia faba L. (-)-jasmonic acid, a plant growth inhibitor in pericarp. Planta. 1981;153:530–5.

  18. 18.

    Hamberg M, Gardner HW. Oxylipin pathway to jasmonates: biochemistry and biological significance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1165:1–18.

  19. 19.

    Feys BJF, Benedetti CE, Penfold CN, Turner JG. Arabidopsis mutants selected for resistance to the phytotoxin coronatine are male sterile, insensitive to methyl jasmonate, and resistant to a bacterial pathogen. Plant Cell. 1994;6:751–9.

  20. 20.

    Xie DX, Feys BF, James S, Nieto-Rostro M, Turner JG. COI1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science. 1998;280:1091–4.

  21. 21.

    Sheard LB, Tan X, Mao H, Withers J, Ben-Nissan G, Hinds TR, et al. Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor. Nature. 2010;468:400–5.

  22. 22.

    Yan J, Zhang C, Gu M, Bai Z, Zhang W, Qi T, et al. The Arabidopsis CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 protein is a jasmonate receptor. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2220–36.

  23. 23.

    Ishiguro S, Kawai-Oda A, Ueda J, Nishida I, Okada K. The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCIENCE gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001;13:2191–209.

  24. 24.

    Caldelari D, Wang G, Farmer EE, Dong X. Arabidopsis lox3 lox4 double mutants are male sterile and defective in global proliferative arrest. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;75:25–33.

  25. 25.

    Chauvin A, Caldelari D, Wolfender J-L, Farmer EE. Four 13-lipoxygenases contribute to rapid jasmonate synthesis in wounded Arabidopsis thaliana leaves: a role for lipoxygenase 6 in responses to long-distance wound signals. New Phytol. 2013;197:566–75.

  26. 26.

    Chauvin A, Lenglet A, Wolfender J-L, Farmer EE. Paired hierarchical organization of 13-lipoxygenases in Arabidopsis. Plants (Basel). 2016;5:E16.

  27. 27.

    Lee D-S, Nioche P, Hamberg M, Raman CS. Structural insights into the evolutionary paths of oxylipin biosynthetic enzymes. Nature. 2008;455:363–8.

  28. 28.

    Stenzel I, Otto M, Delker C, Kirmse N, Schmidt D, Miersch O, et al. ALLENE OXIDE CYCLASE (AOC) gene family members of Arabidopsis thaliana: tissue- and organ-specific promoter activities and in vivo heteromerization. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:6125–38.

  29. 29.

    Otto M, Naumann C, Brandt W, Wasternack C, Hause B. Activity regulation by heteromerization of Arabidopsis allene oxide cyclase family members. Plants (Basel). 2016;5:E3.

  30. 30.

    Laudert D, Pfannschmidt U, Lottspeich F, Holländer-Czytko H, Weiler EW. Cloning, molecular and functional characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana allene oxide synthase (CYP 74), the first enzyme of the octadecanoid pathway to jasmonates. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;31:323–35.

  31. 31.

    Dave A, Hernández ML, He Z, Andriotis VME, Vaistij FE, Larson TR, et al. 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid accumulation during seed development represses seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:583–99.

  32. 32.

    Theodoulou FL, Job K, Slocombe SP, Footitt S, Holdsworth M, Baker A, et al. Jasmonic acid levels are reduced in COMATOSE ATP-binding cassette transporter mutants. Implications for transport of jasmonate precursors into peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2005;137:835–40.

  33. 33.

    Breithaupt C, Kurzbauer R, Lilie H, Schaller A, Strassner J, Huber R, et al. Crystal structure of 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3 from tomato: self-inhibition by dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14337–42.

  34. 34.

    Cruz Castillo M, Martínez C, Buchala A, Métraux J-P, León J. Gene-specific involvement of beta-oxidation in wound-activated responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:85–94.

  35. 35.

    Staswick PE, Tiryaki I. The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2117–27.

  36. 36.

    Larrieu A, Vernoux T. Comparison of plant hormone signalling systems. Essays Biochem. 2015;58:165–81.

  37. 37.

    Chini A, Fonseca S, Fernández G, Adie B, Chico JM, Lorenzo O, et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448:666–71.

  38. 38.

    Thines B, Katsir L, Melotto M, Niu Y, Mandaokar A, Liu G, et al. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCF(COI1) complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448:661–5.

  39. 39.

    Pauwels L, Goossens A. The JAZ proteins: a crucial interface in the jasmonate signaling cascade. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3089–100.

  40. 40.

    Mosblech A, Thurow C, Gatz C, Feussner I, Heilmann I. Jasmonic acid perception by COI1 involves inositol polyphosphates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2011;65:949–57.

  41. 41.

    Monte I, Hamberg M, Chini A, Gimenez-Ibanez S, García-Casado G, Porzel A, et al. Rational design of a ligand-based antagonist of jasmonate perception. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:671–6.

  42. 42.

    Larrieu A, Champion A, Legrand J, Lavenus J, Mast D, Brunoud G, et al. A fluorescent hormone biosensor reveals the dynamics of jasmonate signalling in plants. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6043.

  43. 43.

    Saracco SA, Hansson M, Scalf M, Walker JM, Smith LM, Vierstra RD. Tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometric analysis of ubiquitylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;59:344–58.

  44. 44.

    Pauwels L, Ritter A, Goossens J, Durand AN, Liu H, Gu Y, et al. The RING E3 Ligase KEEP ON GOING Modulates JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN12 Stability. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:1405–17.

  45. 45.

    Nagels Durand A, Pauwels L, Goossens A. The ubiquitin system and jasmonate signaling. Plants (Basel). 2016;5:E6.

  46. 46.

    Chung HS, Howe GA. A critical role for the TIFY motif in repression of jasmonate signaling by a stabilized splice variant of the JASMONATE ZIM-domain protein JAZ10 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:131–45.

  47. 47.

    Chini A, Fonseca S, Chico JM, Fernández-Calvo P, Solano R. The ZIM domain mediates homo- and heteromeric interactions between Arabidopsis JAZ proteins. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2009;59:77–87.

  48. 48.

    Pauwels L, Barbero GF, Geerinck J, Tilleman S, Grunewald W, Pérez AC, et al. NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2010;464:788–91.

  49. 49.

    Zhou M, Memelink J. Jasmonate-responsive transcription factors regulating plant secondary metabolism. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:441–9.

  50. 50.

    Lorenzo O, Chico JM, Sánchez-Serrano JJ, Solano R. JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1938–50.

  51. 51.

    Boter M, Ruíz-Rivero O, Abdeen A, Prat S. Conserved MYC transcription factors play a key role in jasmonate signaling both in tomato and Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1577–91.

  52. 52.

    Gasperini D, Chauvin A, Acosta IF, Kurenda A, Stolz S, Chételat A, et al. Axial and radial oxylipin transport. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:2244–54.

  53. 53.

    Kidd BN, Edgar CI, Kumar KK, Aitken EA, Schenk PM, Manners JM, et al. The mediator complex subunit PFT1 is a key regulator of jasmonate-dependent defense in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2237–52.

  54. 54.

    Zhang F, Yao J, Ke J, Zhang L, Lam VQ, Xin X-F, et al. Structural basis of JAZ repression of MYC transcription factors in jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2015;525:269–73.

  55. 55.

    Pauwels L, Inzé D, Goossens A. Jasmonate-inducible gene: what does it mean? Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:87–91.

  56. 56.

    Noir S, Bömer M, Takahashi N, Ishida T, Tsui T-L, Balbi V, et al. Jasmonate controls leaf growth by repressing cell proliferation and the onset of endoreduplication while maintaining a potential stand-by mode. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1930–51.

  57. 57.

    Zhang Y, Turner JG. Wound-induced endogenous jasmonates stunt plant growth by inhibiting mitosis. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3699.

  58. 58.

    Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T, et al. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science. 2006;311:91–4.

  59. 59.

    Yang D-L, Yao J, Mei C-S, Tong X-H, Zeng L-J, Li Q, et al. Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E1192–1200.

  60. 60.

    Acevedo FE, Rivera-Vega LJ, Chung SH, Ray S, Felton GW. Cues from chewing insects - the intersection of DAMPs, HAMPs, MAMPs and effectors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;26:80–6.

  61. 61.

    Reymond P, Bodenhausen N, Van Poecke RMP, Krishnamurthy V, Dicke M, Farmer EE. A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell. 2004;16:3132–47.

  62. 62.

    Coolen S, Proietti S, Hickman R, Davila Olivas NH, Huang P-P, Van Verk MC, et al. Transcriptome dynamics of Arabidopsis during sequential biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2016;86:249–67.

  63. 63.

    Davila Olivas NH, Coolen S, Huang P, Severing E, van Verk MC, Hickman R, et al. Effect of prior drought and pathogen stress on Arabidopsis transcriptome changes to caterpillar herbivory. New Phytol. 2016;210:1344–56.

  64. 64.

    Conrath U. Molecular aspects of defence priming. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16:524–31.

  65. 65.

    Bruce TJA, Pickett JA. Plant defence signalling induced by biotic attacks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10:387–92.

  66. 66.

    Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z. Multiple exposures to drought “train” transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2012;3:740.

  67. 67.

    Bari R, Jones JDG. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69:473–88.

  68. 68.

    Song GC, Choi HK, Ryu C-M. Gaseous 3-pentanol primes plant immunity against a bacterial speck pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato via salicylic acid and jasmonic acid-dependent signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:821.

  69. 69.

    Martínez-Hidalgo P, García JM, Pozo MJ. Induced systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea by Micromonospora strains isolated from root nodules. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:922.

  70. 70.

    Kant MR, Jonckheere W, Knegt B, Lemos F, Liu J, Schimmel BCJ, et al. Mechanisms and ecological consequences of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities. Ann Bot. 2015;115:1015–51.

  71. 71.

    War AR, Sharma HC, Paulraj MG, War MY, Ignacimuthu S. Herbivore induced plant volatiles: their role in plant defense for pest management. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6:1973–8.

  72. 72.

    Ye M, Song Y, Long J, Wang R, Baerson SR, Pan Z, et al. Priming of jasmonate-mediated antiherbivore defense responses in rice by silicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3631–9.

  73. 73.

    Scalschi L, Camañes G, Llorens E, Fernández-Crespo E, López MM, García-Agustín P, et al. Resistance inducers modulate Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 response in tomato plants. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106429.

  74. 74.

    Stumpe M, Göbel C, Faltin B, Beike AK, Hause B, Himmelsbach K, et al. The moss Physcomitrella patens contains cyclopentenones but no jasmonates: mutations in allene oxide cyclase lead to reduced fertility and altered sporophyte morphology. New Phytol. 2010;188:740–9.

  75. 75.

    Nakamura Y, Mithöfer A, Kombrink E, Boland W, Hamamoto S, Uozumi N, et al. 12-hydroxyjasmonic acid glucoside is a COI1-JAZ-independent activator of leaf-closing movement in Samanea saman. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:1226–36.

  76. 76.

    Vellosillo T, Martínez M, López MA, Vicente J, Cascón T, Dolan L, et al. Oxylipins produced by the 9-lipoxygenase pathway in Arabidopsis regulate lateral root development and defense responses through a specific signaling cascade. Plant Cell. 2007;19:831–46.

  77. 77.

    Koo AJK, Cooke TF, Howe GA. Cytochrome P450 CYP94B3 mediates catabolism and inactivation of the plant hormone jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9298–303.

  78. 78.

    Kitaoka N, Matsubara T, Sato M, Takahashi K, Wakuta S, Kawaide H, et al. Arabidopsis CYP94B3 encodes jasmonyl-L-isoleucine 12-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the oxidative catabolism of jasmonate. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52:1757–65.

  79. 79.

    Heitz T, Widemann E, Lugan R, Miesch L, Ullmann P, Désaubry L, et al. Cytochromes P450 CYP94C1 and CYP94B3 catalyze two successive oxidation steps of plant hormone Jasmonoyl-isoleucine for catabolic turnover. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:6296–306.

  80. 80.

    Woldemariam MG, Onkokesung N, Baldwin IT, Galis I. Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine hydrolase 1 (JIH1) regulates jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine levels and attenuates plant defenses against herbivores. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2012;72:758–67.

  81. 81.

    Widemann E, Miesch L, Lugan R, Holder E, Heinrich C, Aubert Y, et al. The amidohydrolases IAR3 and ILL6 contribute to jasmonoyl-isoleucine hormone turnover and generate 12-hydroxyjasmonic acid upon wounding in Arabidopsis leaves. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:31701–14.

  82. 82.

    Glauser G, Grata E, Dubugnon L, Rudaz S, Farmer EE, Wolfender J-L. Spatial and temporal dynamics of jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis in response to wounding. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16400–7.

  83. 83.

    Kandel S, Sauveplane V, Compagnon V, Franke R, Millet Y, Schreiber L, et al. Characterization of a methyl jasmonate and wounding-responsive cytochrome P450 of Arabidopsis thaliana catalyzing dicarboxylic fatty acid formation in vitro. FEBS J. 2007;274:5116–27.

  84. 84.

    Farmer EE, Johnson RR, Ryan CA. Regulation of expression of proteinase inhibitor genes by methyl jasmonate and jasmonic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1992;98:995–1002.

  85. 85.

    Glauser G, Dubugnon L, Mousavi SAR, Rudaz S, Wolfender J-L, Farmer EE. Velocity estimates for signal propagation leading to systemic jasmonic acid accumulation in wounded Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:34506–13.

  86. 86.

    Siegel A, Sapru HN, Siegel H. Essential neuroscience. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

  87. 87.

    Baldwin IT, Zhang Z-P. Transport of [2- 14 C]jasmonic acid from leaves to roots mimics wound-induced changes in endogenous jasmonic acid pools in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta. 1997;203:436–41.

  88. 88.

    Koo AJK, Howe GA. The wound hormone jasmonate. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1571–80.

  89. 89.

    Wildon DC, Thain JF, Minchin PEH, Gubb IR, Reilly AJ, Skipper YD, et al. Electrical signalling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant. Nature. 1992;360:62–5.

  90. 90.

    Malone M. Hydraulic signals. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 1993;341:33–9.

  91. 91.

    Mousavi SAR, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE. GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature. 2013;500:422–6.

  92. 92.

    Acosta IF, Gasperini D, Chételat A, Stolz S, Santuari L, Farmer EE. Role of NINJA in root jasmonate signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:15473–8.

  93. 93.

    Savary S, Ficke A, Hollier CA. Impacts of global change on crop production and food security. In: Freedman B, editor. Glob. Environ. Change [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 379–87. [cited 2016 Aug 2]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-5784-4_8.

  94. 94.

    Oerke E-C. Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci. 2006;144:31.

  95. 95.

    Ahmad P, Rasool S, Gul A, Sheikh SA, Akram NA, Ashraf M, et al. Jasmonates: multifunctional roles in stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:813.

  96. 96.

    Kazan K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:219–29.

Download references

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, University Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, F-69342, Lyon, France

    • Antoine Larrieu
    •  & Teva Vernoux

Authors

  1. Search for Antoine Larrieu in:

  2. Search for Teva Vernoux in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teva Vernoux.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Jasmonic Acid
  • Methyl Jasmonate
  • OPDA
  • Jasmonic Acid Signaling
  • Jasmonic Acid Response

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us