Mesencephalic origin of the inferior lobe in zebrafish

Solal Bloch; Manon Thomas; Ingrid Colin; Sonya Galant; Elodie Machado; Pierre Affaticati; Arnim Jenett; Kei Yamamoto

doi:10.1186/s12915-019-0631-y

Research article
Open Access
Published: 08 March 2019

Mesencephalic origin of the inferior lobe in zebrafish

Solal Bloch¹,
Manon Thomas^1,3,
Ingrid Colin¹,
Sonya Galant¹,
Elodie Machado²,
Pierre Affaticati²,
Arnim Jenett² &
Kei Yamamoto ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-9022¹

BMC Biology volume 17, Article number: 22 (2019) Cite this article

2435 Accesses
6 Citations
11 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Background

Although the overall brain organization is shared in vertebrates, there are significant differences within subregions among different groups, notably between Sarcopterygii (lobe-finned fish) and Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish). Recent comparative studies focusing on the ventricular morphology have revealed a large diversity of the hypothalamus. Here, we study the development of the inferior lobe (IL), a prominent structure forming a bump on the ventral surface of the teleost brain. Based on its position, IL has been thought to be part of the hypothalamus (therefore forebrain).

Results

Taking advantage of genetic lineage-tracing techniques in zebrafish, we reveal that cells originating from her5-expressing progenitors in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) participate in the formation of a large part of the IL. 3D visualization demonstrated how IL develops in relation to the ventricular system. We found that IL is constituted by two developmental components: the periventricular zone of hypothalamic origin and the external zone of mesencephalic origin. The mesencephalic external zone grows progressively until adulthood by adding new cells throughout development.

Conclusion

Our results disprove a homology between the IL and the mammalian lateral hypothalamus. We suggest that the IL is likely to be involved in multimodal sensory integration rather than feeding motivation. The teleost brain is not a simpler version of the mammalian brain, and our study highlights the evolutionary plasticity of the brain which gives rise to novel structures.

Background

The vertebrate brain is considered to be divided into three main domains: the forebrain (prosencephalon), the midbrain (mesencephalon), and the hindbrain (rhombencephalon). Brain morphogenesis at early embryonic stages is controlled by local signaling centers called the “organizers.” Different organizers are set up successively over time during early development, with the primary organizer being fundamental for the primary neural induction. By interacting with transcription factors, the secondary organizers such as the anterior neural ridge (ANR) and the zona limitans intrathalamica (ZLI) control the morphogenesis of the forebrain, while the isthmic organizer (IsO) located at the midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) controls the morphogenesis of the midbrain and the anterior hindbrain (reviewed in [1]).

Compared to the large morphological diversity in adulthood, embryonic brains appear relatively similar among different vertebrate groups. For this reason, anatomical comparison at this stage is helpful to understand the basic arrangement of the brain morphology. It is accepted that the brain regionalization depends on the establishment of subdivisions along the anterior-posterior (A-P) and dorsal-ventral (D-V) axes of the neural tube. Furthermore, the neuromeric model has refined this view by introducing the notion of segmentation unit along these axes [2, 3].

Regarding regional subdivisions of the most anterior part of the forebrain (secondary prosencephalon), modification of the current prosomeric model has been proposed [4,5,6]: based on the morphological analysis focusing on the ventricular organization, the secondary prosencephalon is divided into three subdivisions (Fig. 1), the telencephalon, the hypothalamus, and the optic recess region (ORR) that extends laterally to form the primordium of the retina [4, 5]. This new view redefines the boundary of the “hypothalamus.” For example, the “alar hypothalamus” of the prosomeric model in tetrapods containing neuroendocrine cells appears to be part of the ORR.

The analysis focusing on the ventricular organization also sheds light on the diversity of the hypothalamic morphology in Osteichthyes (bony vertebrates) [7]. In mammals and birds (amniotes), the hypothalamic ventricle is thin and indistinguishable from the diencephalic part of the third ventricle (3V, Fig. 1a, amniotes). In amphibians, the 3V is extended laterally and thus it is named “the lateral recess (LR) of the infundibulum” [8] (LR; Fig. 1a, amphibians). In teleosts, the hypothalamic ventricle is larger and more complex. In addition to the lateral recess (LR), which corresponds to the tetrapod 3V, teleosts have another recess named the posterior recess (PR; Fig. 1a, b, teleosts). Furthermore, the teleost LR is extremely elongated in the mature brain surrounding the PR, and it forms an additional structure named the “inferior lobe of the hypothalamus” (IL; Fig. 1b, teleosts, red dotted area) [9, 10]. The IL is a structure, which is not present in tetrapods, likely to have evolved specifically in a certain group of Actinopterygii that contains teleosts and holosteans (including gars; Lepisosteidae).

In this study, we examined the developmental origin of the IL in the zebrafish brain, by taking advantage of a cell lineage method based on tamoxifen inducible Cre-lox recombination. It revealed that the external zone of the IL is composed by the progeny of her5-expressing MHB cells, suggesting that a large part of the IL is actually of mesencephalic origin. Inductions at different time points during development provided further information on how this structure forms.

Results

Distribution of cells originating from the 24 hpf MHB in the adult brain

The her5 transcription factor is known to be an early marker of the midbrain-hindbrain domain in zebrafish [11, 12]. Indeed, the zebrafish MHB is well established at 24 hours post-fertilization (hpf), and at this stage, her5 expression is restricted to the MHB ([13]; see also Fig. 2a, b, Additional file 1: Movie S1.). In sagittal sections, the her5 expression territory appears as a thin band, extending from dorsal to ventral. To follow the fate of these her5-expressing progenitors, we crossed two transgenic lines: Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2) and Tg(βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) (Fig. 2d). We verified that the Cre expression is limited to the MHB at 24 hpf, recapitulating the her5 expression (Fig. 2c). Thus, after tamoxifen treatment at 24 hpf, cells expressing her5 and their progenies express mCherry, and we can interpret that all the mCherry-positive cells observed at later stages (after induction) are derived from the MHB.

Movie S1. Expression of her5 in the 24 hpf zebrafish embryo. Expression of mCherry in a transgenic line Tg(her5:mCherry) is shown in magenta, and DiD fiber labeling indicating the morphology of the embryo is shown in gray. (MP4 1999 kb)

As expected, in the brains of adult fish (3 months or older), mesencephalic structures such as the tectum (TeO), the torus semicircularis (TS), and the tegmental area were massively mCherry positive after induction with tamoxifen at 24 hpf (Fig. 3a–c). There was no labeling in forebrain structures such as the hypothalamus or the pretectum (Hy and PT respectively; Fig. 3a, b).

However, some unexpected structures exhibited mCherry-positive cells. The preglomerular nucleus (PG; Fig. 3a’) is a sensory relay nuclear complex that is considered to be part of the posterior tuberculum of the diencephalon. The PG is continuous with a nucleus named the torus lateralis (TLa; Fig. 3b). TLa is classified as part of the tegmentum (thus midbrain) by some authors [14, 15], while as a diencephalic (thus forebrain) by others [10, 16]. The cluster of mCherry-positive cells is continuous from PG to IL through TLa.

The IL is usually considered as part of the hypothalamus [14] because of its location posterior to the hypothalamus proper. Indeed, this structure develops as a lateral elongation of the teleost LR (which corresponds to the amniote 3V in the hypothalamus). However, our data showing a massive of mCherry-positive cells in IL (Fig. 3b, c, Additional file 2: Figure S1) suggest that a large part of this structure is formed by cells originating from the MHB. The diffuse nucleus of the inferior lobe [10] (DIL; Fig. 3b’, c’) is the most labeled area. Numerous mCherry-positive cells are also found in the area corresponding to the central nucleus of the inferior lobe (CIL; Fig. 3c’). Interestingly, most of the outer region of the IL is mCherry positive, but the inner part, close to the LR, is mCherry-negative (Fig. 3b’, c’). The dorso-medial structure called the corpus mamillare (CM) is also mCherry-negative (Fig. 3c’).

Migration of the cells originating from the MHB during development

Our data on the adult brain show that IL has a mesencephalic component. In order to decipher the development and anatomy of this structure in further details, we followed the mCherry-positive cells in whole brains at different stages after induction at 24 hpf.

At 3 days post-fertilization (dpf), all the mCherry-positive cells are still located around the MHB, and there is no labeling at the level of the forebrain (Fig. 4a–g, Additional file 3: Movie S2). This confirms the specificity of the molecular cell tracing method and the absence of leaky expression during the induction process. It further supports that the anterior structures, in which we observe mCherry expression at later stages, are composed of the progeny of cells originating from the MHB exclusively.

Movie S2. Localization of the mCherry-positive cells in the 3 dpf larval head of Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2;βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) zebrafish treated with tamoxifen at 24 hpf (3D visualization of Fig. 4a–d). mCherry-positive cells are shown in magenta, and YOYO-1, a nuclear marker, is shown in green. (MP4 5759 kb)

At 3 dpf, we could not identify the IL. In the lateral view (Fig. 4e), the MHB progenies (cells which were expressing her5 at 24 hpf) extend in a triangular cluster, wider in the dorsal part. The IL was first observable at 5 dpf (Fig. 4h, i; arrows), being more remarkable at 7 dpf (Fig. 4j, k; arrows). MHB progenies extend ventrally in the outer surface of IL (Fig. 4i, k).

From late larval to juvenile stages, we could clearly identify the IL as a ventral protuberance with mCherry cells. Observation of global mCherry expression in the whole brain confirms a continuity of the mCherry labeling between the IL and more dorsal midbrain structures known to be part of the tectum and tegmentum (Fig. 5a–d, Additional file 4: Movie S3). This is also visible in frontal sections at 19 dpf, in which mCherry-positive cells form a continuous strip from the dorsal tectum to the ventral IL (Fig. 5f). At this stage, frontal sections of the IL already resemble those in adult, both anteriorly (Fig. 5e–g) and posteriorly (Fig. 5h–j). At 5 weeks post-fertilization (wpf), the IL continues to grow and appears as a ventral protuberance (Additional file 5: Figure S2).

Movie S3. Localization of the mCherry-positive cells in the 14 dpf larval brain of Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2;βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) zebrafish treated with tamoxifen at 24 hpf (3D visualization of Fig. 5a–d). mCherry-positive cells are shown in magenta, and DiD fiber labeling is shown in gray. (MP4 2602 kb)

Formation of the IL in relation to the lateral recess

In order to better understand how the IL is formed around the LR, we performed a 3D reconstruction of the mCherry-positive cells in relation to the ventricular morphology (Fig. 6a–d, https://zenodo.org/record/2556246). ZO-1 immunostaining labels tight junctions of neuroepithelial cells [17, 18]; thus, it can be used to visualize the ventricular zones of the brain.

Teleosts possess two distinct hypothalamic recesses, LR and PR, which are already observable at 48 hpf [4, 7]. A vast extension of the LR is found at later stages of development, and in the 14 dpf brain, the LR elongates in a posterior direction close to the PR (Fig. 6c, https://zenodo.org/record/2556246).

3D visualization of mCherry-positive cells in relation to the ventricular zone clearly shows that the mCherry-positive cell cluster, which is continuous with the tectal region, covers the external part of the IL (Fig. 6a). In contrast, the ventricular zone of the LR is devoid of mCherry-positive cells (Fig. 6d, https://zenodo.org/record/2556246). In situ hybridization for ccna2, a cell proliferation marker, demonstrates that ventricular cells around the LR are in proliferation, whereas there is no proliferating cell in the external zone where mCherry-positive cells are found (Fig. 7a, a’). A closer look at the IL shows that the LR ventricular zone and the mCherry-positive external zone are separated by a cell-free fiber-rich zone (Fig. 7a’, b’, c; asterisks). Thus, IL is constituted of two anatomically distinct areas: the mCherry-negative ventricular zone is likely to be formed by the cells originating from the LR wall, while the mCherry-positive external zone is formed by the progeny of cells originating from the MHB.

Comparison between 14 dpf and adult IL (after induction at 24 hpf) shows that the relative size of the mCherry-positive external zone is significantly increased in the adult IL. At 14 dpf, there is only a thin layer of mCherry-positive cells (Fig. 7b’). In the adult (Fig. 7c), the mCherry-positive area is enlarged, forming a thicker mass laterally (which corresponds to the DIL). It is also worth noticing that the relative size of the whole IL is larger in adult and that the increase of the number of mCherry-positive cells largely contributes to the growth of IL mainly through its external portion.

Later maturation of IL

The her5 expression domain decreases in size during development but remains specific to the midbrain (Fig. 8a–c, Additional file 6: Movie S4 for 2 wpf; Fig. 8d, e, Additional file 7: Figure S3C for 4 wpf; Fig. 8f, g, Additional file 7: Figure S3F for 6 wpf; and Fig. 8h, i for 8 wpf). In the juvenile brain, her5 is expressed only in two cell clusters along the tectal ventricular zone: one more anteriorly (Fig. 8; yellow arrowheads) and another more posteriorly (Fig. 8; blue arrowheads), which are considered to be the alar part of the mesencephalon. A short-term tracing experiment showed that a few days after the tamoxifen induction, a few induced mCherry cells were observed at the two mesencephalic locations, but not in the forebrain (Additional file 8: Figure S4).

Movie S4. 14 dpf brain of Tg(her5:mCherry) zebrafish, with a focus on the cells expressing her5 endogenously (3D visualization of Fig. 8a–c). For better visualization, the brain is truncated anteriorly in the middle of the optic tectum (TeO) and posteriorly in the cerebellum (Cb). The section includes about half of IL ventrally. mCherry-positive cells are shown in green, and DiD fiber labeling is shown in magenta. The movie starts in frontal view. When switching to lateral/dorsal views, anterior is on the left, posterior is on the right. (MP4 2500 kb)

Observation of their progeny at 3 months post-fertilization (mpf) confirms that they contribute to the formation of IL and that IL continues to grow until late juvenile stages. The her5 progenies are restricted to the outer zone close to the surface of the IL (Fig. 8j–o). This suggests that cells are inserted at the periphery of the IL, all along development. Comparison of 3 mpf brains induced at 4 wpf (Fig. 8j, k), 6 wpf (Fig. 8l, m), and 8 wpf (Fig. 8n, o) clearly shows that induction at later stages results in less mCherry labeling. Thus, the growth of IL is slowing down over time, and IL is nearly mature around 8 wpf.

Comparison between zebrafish and cichlid IL

The IL is a brain structure observed in all teleost species investigated so far. We compared the general organization of the IL of zebrafish with another teleost species, a Malawian cichlid (Maylandia zebra). As it is the case for the zebrafish, cichlid IL is also divided into a cell-dense ventricular zone along the LR and a cell-sparse external zone, which are separated by a cell-free fiber zone (Fig. 9; asterisks).

Nonetheless, there are significant differences between zebrafish and cichlid IL. The relative size of the IL is much larger in cichlid. This is obvious by comparing the IL (the size indicated in green arrows in Fig. 9a, d) with the caudal zone of the hypothalamus (Hy; the size indicated in red arrows in Fig. 9a, d) that is located medially. It is also clear that the proportion of the external zone (mesencephalic part; the size indicated in green arrows in Fig. 9b, e) in comparison with the ventricular zone (hypothalamic part; the size indicated in red arrows in Fig. 9b, e) is much larger in the cichlid IL.

Thus, the organization of the IL changes significantly between young and mature zebrafish brains and also between different species of teleosts. Note that in the cichlid brain, the relative size of the pallium (dorsal telencephalon) is also much larger than in the zebrafish brain (compare Fig. 9c, f, also see the “Discussion” section).

Discussion

New hypothesis on the developmental origin of IL

We took advantage of an inducible Cre transgenic line under the control of her5 promoter to trace the progenies of cells originating from the MHB in zebrafish [13]. The her5 transcription factor is known to be expressed in the MHB, corresponding to the midbrain primordium including both tectum and tegmentum [11, 12]. We followed the ontogeny of the induced mCherry-positive cells, from the earliest time point when the mCherry expression is visible (3 dpf). We confirmed that all the mCherry-positive cells are derived strictly from the MHB area, in other words, none is derived from the forebrain primordium. Thus, based on the cell lineage, we could conclude that all mCherry-positive cells found anterior to the MHB are of mesencephalic origin.

We have shown that PG and IL that were previously classified as forebrain are mainly composed of MHB progenies and therefore are actually mesencephalic. Our data showing a mesencephalic component for the PG shed a new light on the evolutionary scenario of ascending sensory pathways. The PG relays ascending sensory inputs to the pallium, and it has been compared to the dorsal thalamus (which is in the forebrain) in mammals [19]. Thus, our finding suggests that the teleost relay nucleus may not be homologous to the mammalian thalamus. The sensory pathways to the pallium would have evolved independently in mammals and teleosts.

The IL has been considered to be a part of the teleostean hypothalamus (thus forebrain). This structure appears as a caudal continuation of the hypothalamus forming an additional “lobe.” There is no equivalent structure in tetrapods or in ray-finned fishes such as Polypterus and sturgeon; thus, IL would have evolved only in the teleostean and holostean fishes (Neopterygii). Our data suggest IL is formed by cell populations that have different developmental origin: the LR ventricular zone, which is hypothalamic (mCherry-negative), and the external zone, which is mesencephalic (mCherry-positive). The presence of proliferating cells around the LR suggests that the internal ventricular zone is generated by progenitors along the LR. Considering that the LR is an elongation of the hypothalamic ventricle, we can conclude that the mCherry-negative ventricular zone is hypothalamic (Fig. 10a). By contrast, we postulate that the external zone of IL is generated by migrating cells from the tectal ventricular zones, since there is no sign of proliferation in the external zone of IL. The continuous stream of mCherry-positive cells from the dorsal tectal area to the ventral IL suggests that the mesencephalic cells invade a brain structure that grows from the anterior “hypothalamic” LR towards posterior.

Interestingly, IL maturates progressively until the late juvenile stage (summarized in Fig. 10b). Our cell counting of mCherry-positive cells (Additional file 2: Figure S1) indicates that at least half of the progenitors of external IL cells would be generated around 24 hpf (since not all the cells would recombine), and the rest of IL progenitors would be progressively generated during the larval-juvenile stages.

The cells are added at the periphery all along development, with less cells added the older the fish is. The newer cells do not seem to form new layers stacked upon the previous ones, but intercalate with preexisting cells. If successive layers were apposed on each other, mCherry-positive cells induced at 4 wpf should be located in a deeper layer than those induced at 6 wpf (compare Fig. 8k, m). Instead, we always observe the mCherry-positive cells at the surface. Thus, IL seems to grow by adding newer cells inserted between the existing cells on the surface.

Functional implication of IL

Considering that a large part of IL is not hypothalamus, the interpretation of IL functions needs also to be reconsidered. Even though the periventricular part is hypothalamic, our previous studies have already demonstrated that the “hypothalamus” of teleosts and mammals is very different and that careful comparative analyses are required before concluding a simple one to one homology [4, 5, 7]. For example, we have previously shown that a large part of the teleost hypothalamus is mainly composed of a cell type (CSF-contacting neurons) that has been secondarily lost in placental mammals [7]. The hypothalamic CSF-contacting populations are particularly increased in teleosts, around the additional hypothalamic recess (posterior recess, PR) that evolved specifically in teleosts. Thus, the teleost hypothalamic functions cannot be inferred in a simple manner based on available mammalian data. IL would be another example showing the particularity of the teleost brain.

Functions of IL were initially suggested by a set of studies of electrical stimulation of the brain in freely moving fish. Demski and his colleagues showed that electrical stimulation of IL evoked movements such as biting at mirror or snapping objects [20, 21]. IL is also known to receive gustatory sensory inputs [22,23,24]. These data were interpreted with the assumption that IL is hypothalamic, and this is why IL has been proposed to be involved in feeding behaviors [14, 25].

A recent study using zebrafish larvae has shown that IL is activated by visual detection of moving objects [26]. The activation of IL and chasing behavior were evoked by presenting moving objects other than food, such as a moving spot on a screen. Nonetheless, the interpretation was that IL is involved in feeding motivation, because IL was assumed to be homologous to the lateral hypothalamus of mammals. Without this preconception of homology, the data by Muto et al. (2017) simply suggest the involvement of IL in visual detection, and there is no data concerning the motivational state. Indeed, their results rather favor another hypothesis proposing that IL is involved in sensory integration [24, 27,28,29].

Based on connectivity data in several teleost species, IL receives various sensory inputs in addition to gustatory: visual, somatosensory, auditory, and probably lateral line. Thus, IL has also been proposed to be a multisensory integration center [24, 27,28,29]. Taking the electrostimulation data into consideration, IL may integrate multimodal sensory information and evoke motor responses. In the zebrafish larval brain, neuronal connectivity is not fully established, and stimulus-response association is rather simple: visual detection of small moving objects evokes chasing and biting, which is synonymous with feeding behavior.

In the mature brain, notably in teleost species like cichlids, the sensory-motor integration should be more complex. Some species of cichlids and wrasses demonstrate behavioral repertories such as nest construction or tool use [30,31,32]. Based on available anatomical data, these families have a large IL as well as a large pallium [33, 34], being consistent with our observations (Fig. 9d–f). IL is known to receive efferent projections from the pallium in various species [24, 27, 29, 35, 36]. In this context, anatomical and functional correlation between the pallium and IL is an interesting issue to be examined.

Conclusion

Our findings have revealed that some structures which have been considered as part of the forebrain are actually mesencephalic in the zebrafish brain. This refines the current model of the brain regionalization. In addition, the revision on the regional identity of IL modifies the interpretation of previous studies concerning its function. Zebrafish has become an important model in neuroscience. In order to interpret data correctly, we have to be careful with the interpretation of the homology between structures in teleosts and mammals.

Methods

Animals

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) used in this study were raised in our own colony. Zebrafish embryos and larvae cannot be categorized as male or female. For adult zebrafish, both sexes were used and there was no significant difference between male and female. For her5 and ccna2 in situ hybridization, wild-type (AB) embryos (n = ~ 30) were used. For studying the lineage tracing of her5-expressing progenitors (n = ~ 100 for 24 hpf and ~ 10 for each experiment of 3–8 wpf), we crossed two transgenic lines previously used in a recent publication [13]: Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2) and Tg(βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1-mCherry) (see tamoxifen treatment for details). For visualization of her5 expression, we also used another transgenic line (n = ~ 30) Tg(her5BAC:nls-mCherry^gy3) that is simply referred to as Tg(her5:mCherry) [13]. Embryos/larvae up to 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) were maintained and staged as described previously [37]. After larval stages, zebrafish were raised in our fish facility. Three months post-fertilization (3 mpf) or older zebrafish is considered as adult.

Juvenile Malawian cichlids (Maylandia zebra) were kindly provided by Dr. Joël Attia (Neuro-PSI, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne). Three brains (2 females and 1 male) were used in this study, and there was no difference in the general cytoarchitecture of IL between male and female.

Tamoxifen treatment

Tamoxifen treatments were performed in double transgenic fish generated by crossing Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2) and Tg(βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) as described previously [13, 38]. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich T176) was dissolved in ethanol at a concentration of 10 mg/ml and stored at − 20 °C until use. The working solution was freshly prepared before the treatment, further diluted with embryo medium (for 24 hpf) or fish water (for 4–8 wpf). The animals were incubated in the tamoxifen working solution at 28 °C in the dark.

24 hpf embryos were dechorionated with Pronase (Sigma-Aldrich P5147; 1 mg/ml) prior to the tamoxifen treatment. Embryos were placed into the six-well culture plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and were incubated with 10 μg/ml tamoxifen for 6 h. After the incubation, the fish were rinsed three times with embryo medium, then put back to the incubator.

For juvenile stages (4–8 wpf), fish were placed in a beaker (100–200 ml fish water depending on the number of fish) with an air pump and incubated with 2 μg/ml tamoxifen on four consecutive days. The incubation time per day was 4 h, but the treatment was interrupted whenever the fish looked sick. At the end of each incubation, the fish were gently rinsed three times with fish water, placed back to a clean fish tank, and fed.

The tamoxifen-induced mCherry expression was observed at 3 mpf, except for the experiment of short-term tracing. In case of the short-term tracing (Additional file 8: Figure S5), the fish was sacrificed 4 days after the end of the tamoxifen treatment (that is 1 week after the beginning), and immunofluorescence anti-dsRed (see below) was performed to observe the mCherry expression.

Tissue preparations

Zebrafish embryos at 24 hpf and 3 dpf were fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Fisher Scientific) containing 0.1% Tween20 (PBST) overnight at 4 °C. Zebrafish older than 5 dpf were deeply anesthetized using 0.2% tricaine methanesulfonate (MS222; Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in fish water. The fish were fixed in 4% PFA in PBST overnight at 4 °C, then brains were dissected out. Zebrafish embryos used for in situ hybridization (ISH) were dehydrated in ethanol gradient series and kept at − 20 °C in methanol at least for a couple of days. They were rehydrated prior to ISH. For immunolabeling, samples were conserved in a stocking solution containing 0.5% PFA and 0.025% sodium azide. Brains were sectioned in a frontal plane (80 μm) with a vibratome (Leica VT 1000 S). Tissue clearing was performed for whole-mount imaging of zebrafish embryos or larvae (see below).

Cichlid brains were obtained from juvenile individuals (body size around 6–8 cm). The animals were deeply anesthetized in 0.2% MS222 diluted in water and transcardially perfused with cold 4% PFA in PBS. Brains were dissected, post-fixed with 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, then conserved in the stocking solution until use. Brains were sectioned in a frontal plane (80 μm) with a vibratome.

Tissue clearing

Considering the relatively small thickness of zebrafish brains at larval stages, a simplified clearing protocol was applied as described in Affaticati et al. (2018) [39]. Depigmentation step was applied as follows: up to 15 larvae were incubated in 10 mL of pre-incubation solution in a petri dish (0.5× saline sodium citrate buffer (SSC), 0.1% Tween20) for 1 h at room temperature without stirring. Then, samples were bleached by incubation in depigmentation solution (0.5× SSC, 5% formamide, 3% H₂O₂). Samples were left in the solution until pigments were completely degraded. Samples were then washed three times in PBST and left overnight in PBST.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence on larval zebrafish brains (14 dpf and earlier) was performed in 2 mL glass vials. Thorough PBST washes were performed between each antibody incubation step. The samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 h in a blocking solution containing 10% normal goat serum (NGS), 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 5% PBS-glycine 1 M, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% deoxycholate, and 0.1% NP-40 in PBST. Samples were then incubated in staining solution (2% NGS, 20% DMSO, 0.05% sodium azide, 0.2% Triton X-100, 1× PBS, 0.1% Tween20, 10 μg/ml heparin) with anti-dsRed (1:600; Clontech Laboratories 632496, RRID: AB_10013483, Lot# 1612022) at room temperature for 3–4 days with gentle shaking, on a 3D rocker.

Double immunolabeling for dsRed and ZO-1 (1:100; Invitrogen 33-9100, RRID: AB_87181, Lot# SA241427) was performed in 14 dpf brains. Samples were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores (1:600) in staining solution at room temperature for 3–4 days with gentle shaking. Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit (Thermo Fisher Scientific A-11010, RRID: AB_143156, Lot# 1733163) was used for dsRed, and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (Thermo Fisher Scientific A-11001, RRID: AB_2534069, Lot# 1572559) was used for ZO-1. At the end of the second day of the secondary antibody incubation, DiD (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific L7781; 1 μg/ml) was added for membrane labeling, while YOYO-1 (Molecular Probes/Thermo Fisher Scientific Y-3601; 200 nM) was added for nuclear labeling. Finally, samples were incubated in a fructose-based high-refractive index (RI) solution that is adjusted to 1.457. This solution was obtained as described in Affaticati et al. [40].

For brain sections of the adult individuals induced at 24 hpf, mCherry endogenous fluorescence was bright enough to allow direct imaging. For other brain sections, anti-dsRed immunofluorescence (1:600 in PBST containing 4% NGS and 0.3% Triton X-100) was performed. The sections were incubated with the primary antibody at 4 °C overnight and then with secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 546 (1:1000 in PBST) at 4 °C overnight. In order to visualize the brain morphology, the sections were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride; Sigma-Aldrich; 5 μg/ml) at room temperature for 15 min.

In situ hybridization (ISH)

cRNA probes of zebrafish her5 [13, 41], ccna2 [4, 42], and ert2Cre [13, 43] were provided by Dr. L. Bally-Cuif (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France). ISH were performed in toto for 24 hpf zebrafish embryos, while on brain sections for animals older than 14 dpf. Detailed ISH procedures have been described in our previous publications [4, 7].

After rehydration, the 24 hpf embryos or brain sections were first incubated in hybridization buffer at 65 °C for 4 h and then hybridized with 2 ng/ml of cRNA probe in hybridization buffer at 65 °C for at least 18 h. Samples were then washed in gradient series of formamide/2× SSC mixture at 65 °C: 75% formamide/25% 2× SSC, 50% formamide/50% 2× SSC, 25% formamide/75% 2× SSC, then washed in 2× SSC and finally in 0.2× SSC. After being rinsed with PBST at room temperature, the samples were incubated with anti-digoxigenin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (1:2500; sheep anti-DIG-AP Fab fragments; Roche Diagnostics 11093274910, RRID: AB_514497, Lot# 12486522) at 4 °C overnight. After PBST washes, the signal was visualized by incubation with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (BCIP) solution (Roche Diagnostics 11681451001) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.5)/0.1 M NaCl in H₂O (TN buffer). The 24 hpf embryos were embedded into 3% agarose, sectioned with a vibratome in a sagittal plane (40 μm), and slide mounted.

Image acquisition

A Leica TCS SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope was used to image adult sections with a × 25 water immersion objective. For tissue-cleared in toto specimens, the same microscope was used with a Leica HC Fluotar L × 25/1.00 IMM motCorr objective. For all these acquisitions, fluorescence signal was detected through laser excitation of fluorophores at 405, 488, 552, or 638 nm and detection was performed by two internal photomultipliers. Steps in the Z-axis were fixed at 1 μm. Epifluorescence images were acquired using a Multizoom AZ100 (Nikon). Bright-field images were either acquired with an upright microscope BX43 (Olympus) or the Multizoom. Acquired images were adjusted for brightness and contrast using ImageJ/FIJI software.

Quantification of mCherry-positive cells in IL

The mCherry-positive cells in the adult external IL were counted from confocal images using the ImageJ cell counter module. We used stacks of 10 μm frontal sections at anterior and posterior levels, obtained from two specimens of independent experiments of inductions at 24 hpf. The total number of cells was determined with DAPI nuclear labeling of the external IL, that is excluding the ventricular (inner) portion of and corpus mamillare (CM).

3D image reconstruction

Whole specimens (3 dpf entire head; 3, 5, 7, and 14 dpf entire brain) imaged in confocal microscopy were reconstructed in 3D using Imaris 8.0.1 software (Oxford Instrument Company) using the “3D view” visualization tool on a Dell T3610 workstation.

Image segmentation was performed interactively in the segmentation editor of Amira 6.0.1 (FEI Company) on a Dell T630 running Ubuntu 16.04. In preparation of the segmentation of the ventricle volumes, the raw data of the ZO1 signal was cleaned up by subtracting the mCherry signal: [ZO1]-[mCherry]. Similarly, the raw data of the mCherry signal were cleaned up before segmentation by weighted subtraction of the reference channel (DiD): [mCherry]-([DiD]/10). These steps remove low-level contamination (DiD signal bleed-through) with the subtracted signal (mCherry or DiD respectively) from the signal of interest (ZO1 or mCherry), and by this facilitate thresholding and reconstruction. The ZO1 signal was isolated using a combination of local thresholding (Magic Wand) and manual segmentation (Brush) along all three cardinal axes of the data’s coordinate system. For coping with the thin, sheet-like shape of the ventricles, we dilated the segmented volume by two voxels and smoothed it in 3D (three times with a mask size of 6). The mCherry signal was segmented from the cleaned-up data by global thresholding and smoothed in 3D with a mask size of 3. The resulting surfaces were generated with Amira’s “Generate Surface” module (Smoothing: Existing Weights), simplified to about 180K faces each, using Amira’s Simplification Editor and exported to the “Polygon File Format” (ply) for the visualization in other software tools.

References

1.
Echevarría D, Vieira C, Gimeno L, Martínez S. Neuroepithelial secondary organizers and cell fate specification in the developing brain. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003;43:179–91.
Article Google Scholar
2.
Kiecker C, Lumsden A. Compartments and their boundaries in vertebrate brain development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:553–64.
CAS Article Google Scholar
3.
Puelles L, Harrison M, Paxinos G, Watson C. A developmental ontology for the mammalian brain based on the prosomeric model. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:570–8.
CAS Article Google Scholar
4.
Affaticati P, Yamamoto K, Rizzi B, Bureau C, Peyrieras N, Pasqualini C, et al. Identification of the optic recess region as a morphogenetic entity in the zebrafish forebrain. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8738.
Article Google Scholar
5.
Yamamoto K, Bloch S, Vernier P. New perspective on the regionalization of the anterior forebrain in Osteichthyes. Develop Growth Differ. 2017;59:175–87.
Article Google Scholar
6.
Yamamoto K, Bloch S. Overview of brain evolution : lobe-finned fish vs. ray-finned fish. In: Watanabe S, Hofman MA, Shimizu T, editors. Evolution of the brain, cognition, and emotion in vertebrates. Tokyo: Springer; 2017. p. 3–33.
Google Scholar
7.
Xavier AL, Fontaine R, Bloch S, Affaticati P, Jenett A, Demarque M, et al. Comparative analysis of monoaminergic cerebrospinal fluid-contacting cells in Osteichthyes (bony vertebrates). J Comp Neurol. 2017;525:2265–83.
CAS Article Google Scholar
8.
Neary TJ, Northcutt RG. Nuclear organization of the bullfrog diencephalon. J Comp Neurol. 1983;213:262–78.
CAS Article Google Scholar
9.
Demski LS, Evan AP, Saland LC. The structure of the inferior lobe of the teleost hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol. 1975;161:483–97.
CAS Article Google Scholar
10.
Wullimann MF, Rupp B, Reichert H. Neuroanatomy of the zebrafish brain: a topological atlas. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 1996.
Google Scholar
11.
Müller M, von Weizsäcker E, Campos-Ortega JA. Transcription of a zebrafish gene of the hairy-Enhancer of split family delineates the midbrain anlage in the neural plate. Dev Genes Evol. 1996;206:153–60.
Article Google Scholar
12.
Tallafuss A, Bally-Cuif L. Tracing of her5 progeny in zebrafish transgenics reveals the dynamics of midbrain-hindbrain neurogenesis and maintenance. Dev Camb Engl. 2003;130:4307–23.
CAS Google Scholar
13.
Galant S, Furlan G, Coolen M, Dirian L, Foucher I, Bally-Cuif L. Embryonic origin and lineage hierarchies of the neural progenitor subtypes building the zebrafish adult midbrain. Dev Biol. 2016;420:120–35.
CAS Article Google Scholar
14.
Butler AB, Hodos W. Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2005.
Google Scholar
15.
Nieuwenhuys R. An overview of the organization of the brain of Actinopterygian fishes. Amer Zool. 1982;22:287–310.
Article Google Scholar
16.
Braford MR, Northcutt RG. Organization of the diencephalon and pretectum of the ray-finned fishes. In: Davis RE, Northcutt RG, editors. Fish neurobiology, vol 2: higher brain areas and functions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1983. p. 117–64.
Google Scholar
17.
Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S, Kitani-Yasuda T, Tsukita S, Tsukita S. The 220-kD protein colocalizing with cadherins in non-epithelial cells is identical to ZO-1, a tight junction-associated protein in epithelial cells: cDNA cloning and immunoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1993;121:491–502.
CAS Article Google Scholar
18.
Aaku-Saraste E, Hellwig A, Huttner WB. Loss of occludin and functional tight junctions, but not ZO-1, during neural tube closure--remodeling of the neuroepithelium prior to neurogenesis. Dev Biol. 1996;180:664–79.
CAS Article Google Scholar
19.
Yamamoto N, Ito H. Visual, lateral line, and auditory ascending pathways to the dorsal telencephalic area through the rostrolateral region of the lateral preglomerular nucleus in cyprinids. J Comp Neurol. 2008;508:615–47.
Article Google Scholar
20.
Demski LS, Knigge KM. The telencephalon and hypothalamus of the bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus): evoked feeding, aggressive and reproductive behavior with representative frontal sections. J Comp Neurol. 1971;143:1–16.
CAS Article Google Scholar
21.
Demski LS. Feeding and aggressive behavior evoked by hypothalamic stimulation in a cichlid fish. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 1973;44:685–92.
CAS Article Google Scholar
22.
Morita Y, Ito H, Masai H. Central gustatory paths in the crucian carp, Carassius carassius. J Comp Neurol. 1980;191:119–32.
CAS Article Google Scholar
23.
Lamb CF, Caprio J. Diencephalic gustatory connections in the channel catfish. J Comp Neurol. 1993;337:400–18.
CAS Article Google Scholar
24.
Rink E, Wullimann MF. Some forebrain connections of the gustatory system in the goldfish Carassius auratus visualized by separate DiI application to the hypothalamic inferior lobe and the torus lateralis. J Comp Neurol. 1998;394:152–70.
CAS Article Google Scholar
25.
Roberts MG, Savage GE. Effects of hypothalamic lesions on the food intake of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Brain Behav Evol. 1978;15:150–64.
CAS Article Google Scholar
26.
Muto A, Lal P, Ailani D, Abe G, Itoh M, Kawakami K. Activation of the hypothalamic feeding centre upon visual prey detection. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15029.
CAS Article Google Scholar
27.
Shimizu M, Yamamoto N, Yoshimoto M, Ito H. Fiber connections of the inferior lobe in a percomorph teleost, Thamnaconus (Navodon) modestus. Brain Behav Evol. 1999;54:127–46.
CAS Article Google Scholar
28.
Yang C-Y, Xue H-G, Yoshimoto M, Ito H, Yamamoto N, Ozawa H. Fiber connections of the corpus glomerulosum pars rotunda, with special reference to efferent projection pattern to the inferior lobe in a percomorph teleost, tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J Comp Neurol. 2007;501:582–607.
Article Google Scholar
29.
Ahrens K, Wullimann MF. Hypothalamic inferior lobe and lateral torus connections in a percomorph teleost, the red cichlid (Hemichromis lifalili). J Comp Neurol. 2002;449:43–64.
Article Google Scholar
30.
Pollen AA, Dobberfuhl AP, Scace J, Igulu MM, Renn SCP, Shumway CA, et al. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70:21–39.
Article Google Scholar
31.
Pasko L. Tool-like behavior in the sixbar wrasse, Thalassoma hardwicke (Bennett, 1830). Zoo Biol. 2010;29:767–73.
Article Google Scholar
32.
Shumway CA. Habitat complexity, brain, and behavior. Brain Behav Evol. 2008;72:123–34.
Article Google Scholar
33.
Imura K, Yamamoto N, Sawai N, Yoshimoto M, Yang C-Y, Xue H-G, et al. Topographical organization of an indirect telencephalo-cerebellar pathway through the nucleus paracommissuralis in a teleost, Oreochromis niloticus. Brain Behav Evol. 2003;61:70–90.
Article Google Scholar
34.
Marsh KE, Creutz LM, Hawkins MB, Godwin J. Aromatase immunoreactivity in the bluehead wrasse brain, Thalassoma bifasciatum: immunolocalization and co-regionalization with arginine vasotocin and tyrosine hydroxylase. Brain Res. 2006;1126:91–101.
CAS Article Google Scholar
35.
Murakami T, Morita Y, Ito H. Extrinsic and intrinsic fiber connections of the telencephalon in a teleost, Sebastiscus marmoratus. J Comp Neurol. 1983;216:115–31.
CAS Article Google Scholar
36.
Yamamoto N, Ito H. Afferent sources to the ganglion of the terminal nerve in teleosts. J Comp Neurol. 2000;428:355–75.
CAS Article Google Scholar
37.
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253–310.
CAS Article Google Scholar
38.
Mosimann C, Kaufman CK, Li P, Pugach EK, Tamplin OJ, Zon LI. Ubiquitous transgene expression and Cre-based recombination driven by the ubiquitin promoter in zebrafish. Dev Camb Engl. 2011;138:169–77.
CAS Google Scholar
39.
Affaticati P, Le Mével S, Jenett A, Rivière L, Machado E, Mughal BB, et al. X-FaCT: Xenopus-fast clearing technique. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1865:233–41.
Article Google Scholar
40.
Affaticati P, Simion M, De Job E, Rivière L, Hermel J, Machado E, et al. zPACT: tissue clearing and immunohistochemistry on juvenile zebrafish brain. Bio-Protoc. 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2636.
41.
Geling A, Itoh M, Tallafuss A, Chapouton P, Tannhäuser B, Kuwada JY, et al. bHLH transcription factor Her5 links patterning to regional inhibition of neurogenesis at the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Dev Camb Engl. 2003;130:1591–604.
CAS Google Scholar
42.
Coolen M, Thieffry D, Drivenes O, Becker TS, Bally-Cuif L. miR-9 controls the timing of neurogenesis through the direct inhibition of antagonistic factors. Dev Cell. 2012;22:1052–64.
CAS Article Google Scholar
43.
Dirian L, Galant S, Coolen M, Chen W, Bedu S, Houart C, et al. Spatial regionalization and heterochrony in the formation of adult pallial neural stem cells. Dev Cell. 2014;30:123–36.
CAS Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Laure Bally-Cuif and Isabelle Foucher (Institut Pasteur) for sharing their data on the inducible her5 transgenic line, which inspired this study. We thank Joël Attia and Nicolas Boyer (Neuro-PSI, Université de Lyon/Saint-Etienne) for providing cichlids, and Jean-Michel Hermel for helping with the perfusion. Many thanks to members of Tefor Core Facility, notably Elodie de Job, Laurie Rivière, and Isabelle Robineau for their technical help. We also thank Aurélie Heuzé, Matthieu Simion, Jean-Michel Hermel, Jean-Stéphane Joly, Philippe Vernier, Catherine Pasqualini, and Michaël Demarque for discussion or critical reading. Finally, we especially appreciate Elodie Lassere and Jean-Michel Hermel for their tremendous help at the revision of the article.

Funding

This work was supported by CNRS, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Agence National de la Recherche (ANR; PALL-E-NODY), and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale en France (Equipe FRM & Fin de thèse de sciences [FDT201805005408]). It also has benefited from the facilities and expertise of TEFOR - Investissement d’avenir - ANR-II-INBS-0014.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated in this study are included in this published article and its additional files. The interactive 3D visualization of image segmentation illustrating the 14 dpf IL in relation to the ventricular morphology (Fig. 6-interactive) can be found at https://zenodo.org/record/2556246.

Author information

Affiliations

Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (Neuro-PSI), CNRS UMR9197, Univ Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS Bâtiment 5, Avenue de la Terrasse, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Solal Bloch, Manon Thomas, Ingrid Colin, Sonya Galant & Kei Yamamoto
TEFOR Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMS2010, INRA UMS1451, Univ Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Elodie Machado, Pierre Affaticati & Arnim Jenett
Present address: Plateau de phénotypage TEFOR, LPGP-INRA UR1037, 35042, Rennes, France
Manon Thomas

Authors

Solal Bloch
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Manon Thomas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ingrid Colin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sonya Galant
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elodie Machado
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pierre Affaticati
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Arnim Jenett
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kei Yamamoto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB and KY designed the experiments and wrote the manuscripts. SB, MT, IC, EM, PA, and KY performed the experiments. SB, MT, and KY analyzed the data. SG generated the Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2) and Tg(her5BAC:nls-mCherry^gy3) transgenic lines. AJ performed the image segmentation and 3D reconstruction. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All experimental protocols and care of laboratory animals were conducted in compliance with the official regulatory standards and approval of the French Government (reference document n°APAFIS#1286- 2015062616102603 v5).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 2:

Figure S1. Quantification of mCherry-positive cells in the external IL. Proportion of mCherry labeled cells (gray bar) in relation to the total number of DAPI-labeled cells was calculated from frontal sections of adult zebrafish brains (tamoxifen induction at 24 hpf). The section level of “anterior” corresponds to the level of Fig. 3b, and the level of “posterior” corresponds to the level of Fig. 3c. The “total” represents sum of them. (PDF 51 kb)

Additional file 5:

Figure S2. Localization of the mCherry-positive cells in the 5 wpf juvenile brain of Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2;βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) zebrafish treated with tamoxifen at 24 hpf. Frontal sections showing mCherry-positive cells in magenta and DAPI nuclear labeling in gray. A-C show the anterior IL and D-E show more posterior IL. Scale bars: 100 μm. Abbreviations, Hy: hypothalamus, IL: inferior lobe, TeO: optic tectum. (TIF 10750 kb)

Additional file 7:

Figure S3. Endogenous expression of her5 in juvenile zebrafish brains. In situ hybridization of her5 on frontal sections of 4 wpf (A-C) and 6 wpf (D-F) brains. The plane of each section is indicated in the schematic drawing on the top. There is no her5 expression in the anterior sections containing forebrain regions (A, B, D, E). In the brain sections containing the mesencephalic region, her5 expression is found along the tectal ventricular zone (C, F; arrows). Scale bar: 100 μm. Abbreviation, Di: diencephalon, IL: inferior lobe, Tel: telencephalon, TeO: optic tectum, Tg: tegmentum. (TIF 17072 kb)

Additional file 8:

Figure S4. Short-term tracing of tamoxifen-induced mCherry-positive cells in the Tg(her5:ERT2CreERT2;βact:lox-stop-lox-hmgb1:mCherry) juvenile zebrafish brain. Frontal sections of a 4 wpf brain, showing mCherry-positive cells in magenta and DAPI nuclear labeling in gray. The plane of each section is indicated in the schematic drawing on the top. A, B Anterior brain sections containing forebrain regions where there is no mCherry-positive cell. C, D More posterior brain sections containing mesencephalic regions where a few mCherry-positive cells are found close to the tectal ventricular zone. C’ and D’ show the area squared in C and D at a higher magnification. Scale bar: 60 μm for A and B, 100 μm for C and D, and 10 μm for C’ and D’. Abbreviation, Hy: hypothalamus, IL: inferior lobe, PG: preglomerular nucleus, Tel: telencephalon, TeO: optic tectum, V: ventricle. (TIF 18788 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloch, S., Thomas, M., Colin, I. et al. Mesencephalic origin of the inferior lobe in zebrafish. BMC Biol 17, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0631-y

Download citation

Received: 10 August 2018
Accepted: 22 January 2019
Published: 08 March 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0631-y

Keywords

Teleost
Midbrain
Forebrain
Evolution
Homology
Vertebrate
Comparative neuroanatomy
Development
Cell lineage
Ventricle

Mesencephalic origin of the inferior lobe in zebrafish

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusion

Background

Results

Distribution of cells originating from the 24 hpf MHB in the adult brain

Migration of the cells originating from the MHB during development

Formation of the IL in relation to the lateral recess

Later maturation of IL

Comparison between zebrafish and cichlid IL

Discussion

New hypothesis on the developmental origin of IL

Functional implication of IL

Conclusion

Methods

Animals

Tamoxifen treatment

Tissue preparations

Tissue clearing

Immunofluorescence

In situ hybridization (ISH)

Image acquisition

Quantification of mCherry-positive cells in IL

3D image reconstruction

References

Acknowledgements

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Author information

Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Additional files

Additional file 2:

Additional file 5:

Additional file 7:

Additional file 8:

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keywords

BMC Biology

Contact us