Finch CE. Longevity, senescence, and the genome. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1990.
Google Scholar
Rose MR. Evolutionary biology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
Google Scholar
Partridge L, Barton NH. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of aging. Nature. 1993;362:305–11.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ricklefs RE. Evolutionary theories of aging: confirmation of a fundamental prediction, with implications for the genetic basis and evolution of life span. Am Nat. 1998;152:24–44.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Flatt T, Partridge L. Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biol. 2018;16:93.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Fisher RA. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1930.
Book
Google Scholar
Haldane JBS. New paths in genetics. London: Allen & Unwin; 1941.
Google Scholar
Medawar PB. An unsolved problem in biology. London: HK Lewis; 1952.
Google Scholar
Williams GC. Pleiotropy, natural-selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution. 1957;11:398–411.
Article
Google Scholar
Hamilton WD. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol. 1966;12:12–45.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Charlesworth B. Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press; 1994.
Book
Google Scholar
Rose MR. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1984;38:1004–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Luckinbill LS, Arking R, Clare MJ, Cirocco WC, Buck SA. Selection for delayed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1984;38:996–1003.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zwaan B, Bijlsma R, Hoekstra RF. Direct selection on life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1995;49:649–59.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Partridge L, Prowse N, Pignatelli P. Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999;266:255–61.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Charmantier A, Perrins C, McCleery RH, Sheldon BC. Quantitative genetics of age at reproduction in wild swans: support for antagonistic pleiotropy models of senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:6587–92.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nussey DH, Wilson AJ, Morris A, Pemberton J, Clutton-Brock T, Kruuk LEB. Testing for genetic trade-offs between early- and late-life reproduction in a wild red deer population. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2008;275:745–50.
Google Scholar
Remolina SC, Chang PL, Leips J, Nuzhdin SV, Hughes KA. Genomic basis of aging and life-history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2012;66:3390–403.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Charlesworth B, Hughes KA. Age-specific inbreeding depression and components of genetic variance in relation to the evolution of senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:6140–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hughes KA, Alipaz JA, Drnevich JM, Reynolds RM. A test of evolutionary theories of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14286–91.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Snoke MS, Promislow DEL. Quantitative genetic tests of recent senescence theory: age-specific mortality and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity. 2003;91:546–56.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Swindell WR, Bouzat JL. Inbreeding depression and male survivorship in Drosophila: implications for senescence theory. Genetics. 2006;172:317–27.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Borash DJ, Rose MR, Mueller LD. Mutation accumulation affects male virility in Drosophila selected for later reproduction. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2007;80:461–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reynolds RM, Temiyasathit S, Reedy MM, Ruedi EA, Drnevich JM, et al. Age specificity of inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster and implications for the evolution of late life mortality plateaus. Genetics. 2007;177:587–95.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Keller LF, Reid JM, Arcese P. Testing evolutionary models of senescence in a natural population: age and inbreeding effects on fitness components in song sparrows. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2008;275:597–604.
CAS
Google Scholar
Escobar JS, Jarne P, Charmantier A, David P. Outbreeding alleviates senescence in hermaphroditic snails as expected from the mutation-accumulation theory. Curr Biol. 2008;18:906–10.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burke MK, King EG, Shahrestani P, Rose MR, Long AD. Genome-wide association study of extreme longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:1–11.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Durham MF, Magwire MM, Stone EA, Leips J. Genome-wide analysis in Drosophila reveals age-specific effects of SNPs on fitness traits. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4338.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lohr JN, Haag CR. Genetic load, inbreeding depression, and hybrid vigor covary with population size: an empirical evaluation of theoretical predictions. Evolution. 2015;69:3109–22.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maklakov AA, Rowe L, Friberg U. Why organisms age: evolution of senescence under positive pleiotropy? Bioessays. 2015;37:802–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leroi AM, Chippindale AK, Rose MR. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype by environment interaction. Evolution. 1994;48:1244–57.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leroi AM, Chen WR, Rose MR. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Stability of genetic correlations. Evolution. 1994;48:1258–68.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Houle D, Hughes KA, Hoffmaster DK, Ihara J, Assimacopoulos S, et al. The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. 1. Variances and covariances of life-history traits. Genetics. 1994;138:773–85.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Curtsinger JW, Khazaeli AA. Lifespan, QTLs, age-specificity, and pleiotropy in Drosophila. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123:81–93.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reznick DN, Bryant MJ, Roff D, Ghalambor CK, Ghalambor DE. Effect of extrinsic mortality on the evolution of senescence in guppies. Nature. 2004;431:1095–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Estes S, Ajie BC, Lynch M, Phillips PC. Spontaneous mutational correlations for life-history, morphological and behavioral characters in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2005;170:645–53.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dowling DK, Maklakov AA, Friberg U, Hailer F. Applying the genetic theories of ageing to the cytoplasm: cytoplasmic genetic covariation for fitness and lifespan. J Evol Biol. 2009;22:818–27.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW. Life history variation in an artificially selected population of Drosophila melanogaster: pleiotropy, superflies, and age-specific adaptation. Evolution. 2010;64:3409–16.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW. Pleiotropy and life history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: uncoupling life span and early fecundity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;68:546–53.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Chen H-Y, Maklakov AA. Longer lifespan evolves under high rates of condition dependent mortality. Curr Biol. 2012;22:2140–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kimber CM, Chippindale AK. Mutation, condition and the maintenance of extended lifespan in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2013;23:2283–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moorad JA, Walling CA. Measuring selection for genes that promote long life in a historical human population. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1773–81.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Charlesworth B. Patterns of age-specific means and genetic variances of mortality rates predicted by the mutation-accumulation theory of ageing. J Theor Biol. 2001;210:47–65.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hughes KA. The evolutionary genetics of male life history characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1995;49:521–37.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hughes KA, Leips J. Pleiotropy, constraint, and modularity in the evolution of life histories: insights from genomic analyses. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1389:76–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wachter KW, Evans SN, Steinsaltz DR. The age-specific force of natural selection and biodemographic walls of death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:10141–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wachter KW, Evans SN, Steinsaltz DR. Evolutionary shaping of demographic schedules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:10846–53.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hughes KA. Mutation and the evolution of ageing: from biometrics to system genetics. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 2010;365:1273–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Leips J, Gilligan P, Mackay TFC. Quantitative trait loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2006;172:1595–605.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Everman ER, Morgan TJ. Antagonistic pleiotropy and mutation accumulation contribute to age-related decline in stress response. Evolution. 2017;72:303–17.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rodríguez JA, Marigorta UM, Hughes DA, Spataro N, Bosch E, Navarro A. Antagonistic pleiotropy and mutation accumulation influence human senescence and disease. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hughes KA, Charlesworth B. A genetic analysis of senescence in Drosophila. Nature. 1994;367:64–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cui R, Medeiros T, Willemsen D, Iasi LNM, Colliner GE, Graef M, Reichard M, Valenzano DR. Relaxed selection limits lifespan by increasing mutation load. Cell. 2019;178:385–99.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Willemsen D, Cui R, Reichard M, Valenzano DR. Intra-species differences in population size shape life history and genome evolution. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/852368.
Pletcher SD, Houle D, Curtsinger JW. Age-specific properties of spontaneous mutations affecting mortality in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1998;148:287–303.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pletcher SD, Houle D, Curtsinger JW. The evolution of age-specific mortality rates in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic divergence among unselected lines. Genetics. 1999;153:813–23.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yampolsky LY, Pearse LE, Promislow DEL. Age-specific effects of novel mutations in Drosophila melanogaster I. Mortal Genet. 2001;110:11–29.
Google Scholar
Mack PD, Lester VK, Promislow DEL. Age-specific effects of novel mutations in Drosophila melanogaster II. Fecundity and male mating ability. Genetica. 2001;110:31–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Moorad JA, Promislow DEL. A theory of age-dependent mutation and senescence. Genetics. 2008;179:2061–73.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography. 1979;16:439–54.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vaupel JW, Yashin AI. Heterogeneity’s ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat. 1985;39:176–85.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Robertson FW, Reeve ECR. Heterozygosity, environmental variation and heterosis. Nature. 1952;170:286.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pletcher SD, Curtsinger JW. The influence of environmentally induced heterogeneity on age-specific genetic variance for mortality rates. Genet Res Camb. 2000;75:321–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Service PM. Heterogeneity in individual mortality risk and its importance for evolutionary studies of senescence. Am Nat. 2000;156:1–13.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Promislow DEL, Tatar M. Mutation and senescence: where genetic and demography meet. Genetica. 1998;102(/103):299–314.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gladyshev VN. The origin of aging: imperfectness-driven non-random damage defines the aging process and control of lifespan. Trends Genet. 2013;29:506–12.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gladyshev VN. Aging: progressive decline in fitness due to the rising deleteriome adjusted by genetic, environmental, and stochastic processes. Aging Cell. 2016;15:594–602.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS. The biology of life span: a quantitative approach. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1991.
Google Scholar
Laird RA, Sherratt TN. The evolution of senescence through decelerating selection for system reliability. J Evol Biol. 2009;22:974–82.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cooper EB, Kruuk LEB. Ageing with a silver-spoon: a meta-analysis of the effect of developmental environment on senescence. Evol Lett. 2018;2:460–71.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kirkwood TBL. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977;270:301–4.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kirkwood TBL, Holliday R. The evolution of ageing and longevity. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1979;205:531–46.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fox CW, Reed DH. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and a meta-analysis. Evolution. 2010;65:246–58.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Martin G, Lenormand T. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution. 2006;60:2413–27.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:450–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arbeitman AN, Furlong EEM, Imam F, Johnson E, Null BH, Baker BS, et al. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2002;297:2270–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, Duff MO, Landolin JM, Yang L, et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2010;471:473–9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Magwere T, Chapman T, Partridge L. Sex differences in the effect of dietary restriction on life span and mortality rates in female and male Drosophila melanogaster. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:3–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lehtovaara A, Schielzeth H, Flis I, Friberg U. Heritability of life span is largely sex-limited in fruit flies. Am Nat. 2013;182:653–65.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Griffin RM, Schielzeth H, Friberg U. Autosomal and X-linked additive genetic variation for lifespan and aging: comparisons within and between the sexes in Drosophila melanogaster. G3. 2016;6:3903–11.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zajitschek F, Georgolopoulos G, Vourlou A, Zajitschek SRK, Friberg U, Maklakov AA. Evolution under dietary restriction decouples survival from fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster females. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74:1542–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zajitschek F, Zajitschek SRK, Canton C, Georgolopoulos G, Friberg U, Maklakov AA. Evolution under dietary restriction increases male reproductive performance without survival cost. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2016;283:1825.
Google Scholar
Duxbury EML, Rostant WG, Chapman T. Manipulation of feeding regime alters sexual dimorphism for lifespan and reduces sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2017;284:20170391.
Google Scholar
Brengdahl M, Kimber CM, Maguire-Baxter J, Friberg U. Sex differences in life span: females homozygous for the X chromosome do not suffer the shorter life span predicted by the unguarded X hypothesis. Evolution. 2018;72:568–77.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brengdahl M, Kimber CM, Maguire-Baxter J, Malacrinò A, Friberg U. Genetic quality affects the rate of male and female reproductive aging differently in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat. 2018;192:761–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sultanova Z, Carazo P. Sex ratio at mating does not modulate age fitness effects in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:6501–7.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Clark SCA, Sharp NP, Rowe L, Agrawal AF. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37351.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sharp NP, Agrawal AF. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2008;62:857–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sharp NP, Agrawal AF. Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6142–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tedman-Aucoin K, Agrawal AF. The effect of deleterious mutations and age on recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2012;66:575–85.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Friberg U, Stewart AD, Rice WR. X- and Y-chromosome linked paternal effects on a life-history trait. Bio Lett. 2011;8:71–3.
Article
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. https://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar
Goodrich B, Gabry J, Ali I, Brilleman S. rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. R package version 2.18.2. 2018. http://mc-stan.org/.
Brengdahl M, Kimber CM, Elias P, Thompson J, Friberg U. Data from: deleterious mutations show increasing negative effects with age in Drosophila melanogaster. Dryad Digital Repository, http:// doi:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4mw6m93h.