|
Test statistic
|
p
|
---|
Species
|
F1,154 = 0.2222
|
0.6381
|
Sex
|
F2,154 = 0.0160
|
0.9841
|
Social status
|
F2,154 = 0.6564
|
0.5201
|
Disease
|
F4,154 = 1.3522
|
0.2532
|
Measure: infarct volume versus others
|
F1,154 = 22.7385
|
< 0.0001
|
Species × sex
|
F2,154 = 1.6491
|
0.1956
|
Species × social status
|
F2,154 = 0.5794
|
0.5615
|
Sex × social status
|
F4,154 = 0.6208
|
0.6484
|
Resource category
|
F3,139 = 0.8280
|
0.4806
|
Resource category × species
|
F3,139 = 1.0409
|
0.3766
|
After removal of ‘red flags’
|
Species
|
F1,91 = 0.0351
|
0.8517
|
Sex
|
F2,91 = 0.2542
|
0.7761
|
Social status
|
F2,91 = 0.4339
|
0.6493
|
Disease
|
F4,91 = 2.5952
|
0.0415
|
Measure: infarct volume versus others
|
F1,91 = 15.8439
|
0.0001
|
Species × sex
|
F2,91 = 0.9884
|
0.3761
|
Species × social status
|
F2,91 = 0.9929
|
0.3745
|
Sex × social status
|
F4,91 = 0.2229
|
0.9250
|
Resource category
|
F3,83 = 2.5128
|
0.0641
|
Resource category × species
|
F3,83 = 0.8890
|
0.4504
|
- Results from a random-effects meta-regression investigating potential moderators of housing effects (effects of conventional housing versus housing ‘enriched’ with resources supporting species-typical behaviour) on stress-sensitive disease (standardized mean differences). (See Additional file 10 for a replicate excluding study weights). Bold p values are significant at p < 0.05.