Carbone L. Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care. CCAC animal data report. 2019:2019.
European Commission. 2019 report on the statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015-2017. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. 2019.
Wieschowski S, Biernot S, Deutsch S, Glage S, Bleich A, Tolba R, et al. Publication rates in animal research. Extent and characteristics of published and non-published animal studies followed up at two German university medical centres. PloS one. 2019;14(11):e0223758.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News. 2016;533(7604):452.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLOS Biology. 2015;13(6):e1002165.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Begley CG, Ellis LM. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483(7391):531–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hartshorne J, Schachner A. Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2012;6(8).
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. 2004.
Google Scholar
Geerts H. Of mice and men: bridging the translational disconnect in CNS drug discovery. CNS drugs. 2009;23(11):915–26.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perrin S. Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work. Nature. 2014;507(7493):423–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
MacLellan A, Adcock A, Mason GJ. Behavioral Biology of Mice. In: Coleman K, Schapiro SJ, editors. Behavioral biology of laboratory animals. Abingdon: Routledge; 2021.
Google Scholar
Cloutier S. Behavioral Biology of Rats. In: Coleman K, Schapiro SJ, editors. Behavioral biology of laboratory animals. Abingdon: Routledge; 2021.
Google Scholar
Bradshaw AL, Poling A. Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels as enrichment items. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior. 1991;55(2):245–50.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Van de Weerd H, Van Loo P, Van Zutphen L, Koolhaas J, Baumans V. Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Laboratory animals. 1997;31(2):133–43.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hess SE, Rohr S, Dufour BD, Gaskill BN, Pajor EA, Garner JP. Home improvement: C57BL/6 J mice given more naturalistic nesting materials build better nests. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS. 2008;47(6):25–31.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sherwin C, Haug E, Terkelsen N, Vadgama M. Studies on the motivation for burrowing by laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2004;88(3-4):343–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Makowska IJ, Weary DM. The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3(6):160136.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Walker M, Mason G. A comparison of two types of running wheel in terms of mouse preference, health, and welfare. Physiology & Behavior. 2018;191:82–90.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sherwin C. Laboratory mice persist in gaining access to resources: a method of assessing the importance of environmental features. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1996;48(3-4):203–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Tilly S-LC, Dallaire J, Mason GJ. Middle-aged mice with enrichment-resistant stereotypic behaviour show reduced motivation for enrichment. Animal Behaviour. 2010;80(3):363–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Bailoo JD, Murphy E, Boada-Saña M, Varholick JA, Hintze S, Baussière C, et al. Effects of cage enrichment on behavior, welfare and outcome variability in female mice. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2018;12(232).
Bechard A, Meagher R, Mason G. Environmental enrichment reduces the likelihood of alopecia in adult C57BL/6 J mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS. 2011;50(2):171–4.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fureix C, Walker M, Harper L, Reynolds K, Saldivia-Woo A, Mason G. Stereotypic behaviour in standard non-enriched cages is an alternative to depression-like responses in C57BL/6 mice. Behavioural Brain Research. 2016;305:186–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mason GJ, Latham N. Can't stop, won't stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Animal Welfare. 2004;13:S57–69.
CAS
Google Scholar
Würbel H, Chapman R, Rutland C. Effect of feed and environmental enrichment on development of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1998;60(1):69–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Brydges NM, Leach M, Nicol K, Wright R, Bateson M. Environmental enrichment induces optimistic cognitive bias in rats. Animal Behaviour. 2011;81(1):169–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Burman OH, Parker R, Paul ES, Mendl M. A spatial judgement task to determine background emotional state in laboratory rats. Rattus norvegicus. Animal Behaviour. 2008;76(3):801–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Resasco A, MacLellan A, Ayala M, Kitchenham L, Edwards A, Lam S, et al. Cancer blues? A promising judgment bias task indicates pessimism in nude mice with tumors. Physiology & Behavior. 2021;113465.
Richter SH, Schick A, Hoyer C, Lankisch K, Gass P, Vollmayr B. A glass full of optimism: enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2012;12(3):527–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Van Gool W, Mirmiran M. Effects of aging and housing in an enriched environment on sleep-wake patterns in rats. Sleep. 1986;9(2):335–47.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tagney J. Sleep patterns related to rearing rats in enriched and impoverished environments. Brain research. 1973;53(2):353–61.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rockman GE, Glavin GB. Activity stress effects on voluntary ethanol consumption, mortality and ulcer development in rats. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 1986;24(4):869–73.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meijer MK, Spruijt BM, van Zutphen LF, Baumans V. Effect of restraint and injection methods on heart rate and body temperature in mice. Lab Anim. 2006;40(4):382–91.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2010. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union.
Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care. CCAC guidelines: Mice, (2019).
Taylor K, Alvarez LR. An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2019;47(5-6):196–213.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
National Research Council. In: th, editor. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington (DC) 2011.
Ogden BE, Pang W, Agui T, Lee BH. Laboratory animal laws, regulations, guidelines and standards in China Mainland, Japan, and Korea. ILAR journal. 2017;57(3):301–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Lahvis GP. Point of view: unbridle biomedical research from the laboratory cage. Elife. 2017;6:e27438.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mo C, Renoir T, Hannan AJ. What's wrong with my mouse cage? Methodological considerations for modeling lifestyle factors and gene–environment interactions in mice. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2016;265:99–108.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burrows L, E, J Hannan A. Towards environmental construct validity in animal models of CNS disorders: optimizing translation of preclinical studies. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders). 2013;12(5):587–92.
CAS
Google Scholar
Sherwin C. The influences of standard laboratory cages on rodents and the validity of research data. Animal Welfare. 2004;13(1):9–15.
Google Scholar
Burrows EL, McOmish CE, Hannan AJ. Gene–environment interactions and construct validity in preclinical models of psychiatric disorders. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2011;35(6):1376–82.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lahvis GP. Rodent models of autism, epigenetics, and the inescapable problem of animal constraint. In: Gewirtz JC, Kim Y-K, editors. Animal Models of Behavior Genetics. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2016. p. 265–301.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Cohen S, Murphy MLM, Prather AA. Ten surprising facts about stressful life events and disease risk. Annual Review of Psychology. 2019;70(1):577–97.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zimmerman G, Shaltiel G, Barbash S, Cohen J, Gasho CJ, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, et al. Post-traumatic anxiety associates with failure of the innate immune receptor TLR9 to evade the pro-inflammatory NFκB pathway. Translational. Psychiatry. 2012;2(2):e78.
CAS
Google Scholar
Rutters F, Pilz S, Koopman AD, Rauh SP, Te Velde SJ, Stehouwer CD, et al. The association between psychosocial stress and mortality is mediated by lifestyle and chronic diseases: the Hoorn Study. Soc Sci Med. 2014;118:166–72.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological bulletin. 2004;130(4):601.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Doyle WJ, Miller GE, Frank E, Rabin BS, et al. Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation, and disease risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(16):5995–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Geng C, Guo Y, Wang C, Liao D, Han W, Zhang J, et al. Systematic impacts of chronic unpredictable mild stress on metabolomics in rats. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–11.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Razzoli M, Nyuyki‐Dufe K, Gurney A, Erickson C, McCallum J, Spielman N, et al. Social stress shortens lifespan in mice. Aging cell. 2018;17(4).
National Research Council. Recognition and alleviation of distress in laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2008.
Mason G, Walker M, Duggan G, Roulston N, Van Slack A. Negative affective states and their effects on morbidity, mortality and longevity; 2012.
Google Scholar
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4(1):1.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nakagawa S, Noble DW, Senior AM, Lagisz M. Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC biology. 2017;15(1):1–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Vesterinen H, Sena E, Egan K, Hirst T, Churolov L, Currie G, et al. Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2014;221:92–102.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Van Loo PL, de Groot AC, Van Zutphen BF, Baumans V. Do male mice prefer or avoid each other's company? Influence of hierarchy, kinship, and familiarity. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 2001;4(2):91–103.
Article
Google Scholar
Howerton CL, Garner JP, Mench JA. Effects of a running wheel-igloo enrichment on aggression, hierarchy linearity, and stereotypy in group-housed male CD-1 (ICR) mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2008;115(1):90–103.
Article
Google Scholar
Walker MD, Mason G. Female C57BL/6 mice show consistent individual differences in spontaneous interaction with environmental enrichment that are predicted by neophobia. Behavioural Brain Research. 2011;224(1):207–12.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Will B, Pallaud B, Ungerer A, Ropartz P. Effects of rearing in different environments on subsequent environmental preference in rats. Developmental psychobiology. 1979;12(2):151–60.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Higgins J, Li T, Deeks JJ. Effect measures. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 62: Cochrane, 2021; 2021.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic press; 2013.
Rohatgi A. WebPlotDigitizer. 4.4 ed. Pacifica, California, USA 2020.
Guyot P, Ades A, Ouwens MJ, Welton NJ. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC medical research methodology. 2012;12(1):1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, De Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36(3):1–48.
Article
Google Scholar
Rücker G, Cates CJ, Schwarzer G. Methods for including information from multi‐arm trials in pairwise meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2017;8(4):392–403.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lajeunesse MJ. On the meta‐analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi‐group designs. Ecology. 2011;92(11):2049–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8):1–193.
Article
Google Scholar
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;1088-101.
Sterne JA, Becker BJ, Egger M. The funnel plot. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. 2005:75-98.
Idris NRN. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias for meta-analysis of continuous data. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2012;12(13):1413–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Hicks JA, Hatzidis A, Arruda NL, Gelineau RR, De Pina IM, Adams KW, et al. Voluntary wheel-running attenuates insulin and weight gain and affects anxiety-like behaviors in C57BL6/J mice exposed to a high-fat diet. Behav Brain Res. 2016;310:1–10.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Latham N, Mason G. From house mouse to mouse house: the behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2004;86(3):261–89.
Article
Google Scholar
Liss C, Litwak K, Reinhardt V, Tilford D. Comfortable quarters for laboratory animals. Animal Welfare Institute. 2015.
Wei Y, Yang CR, Wei YP, Ge ZJ, Zhao ZA, Zhang B, et al. Enriched environment-induced maternal weight loss reprograms metabolic gene expression in mouse offspring. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2015;290(8):4604–19.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Martin B, Ji S, Maudsley S, Mattson MP. "Control" laboratory rodents are metabolically morbid: why it matters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(14):6127–33.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gaskill BN, Gordon CJ, Pajor EA, Lucas JR, Davis JK, Garner JP. Heat or insulation: behavioral titration of mouse preference for warmth or access to a nest. PloS one. 2012;7(3):e32799.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gaskill BN, Gordon CJ, Pajor EA, Lucas JR, Davis JK, Garner JP. Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology. Physiol Behav. 2013;110-111:87–95.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gaskill BN, Pritchett-Corning KR, Gordon CJ, Pajor EA, Lucas JR, Davis JK, et al. Energy reallocation to breeding performance through improved nest building in laboratory mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74153.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hankenson FC, Marx JO, Gordon CJ, David JM. Effects of rodent thermoregulation on animal models in the research environment. Comp Med. 2018;68(6):425–38.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hylander BL, Repasky EA. Thermoneutrality, mice, and cancer: a heated opinion. Trends in cancer. 2016;2(4):166–75.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nakagawa S, Poulin R, Mengersen K, Reinhold K, Engqvist L, Lagisz M, et al. Meta‐analysis of variation: ecological and evolutionary applications and beyond. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;6(2):143–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011;64(4):383–94.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology. 2020;18(7):e3000410.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lazic SE, Clarke-Williams CJ, Munafò MR. What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments? PLoS Biology. 2018;16(4):e2005282.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lazic SE. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis? BMC neuroscience. 2010;11(1):1-17.
Festing MF, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. Ilar j. 2002;43(4):244–58.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Festing MF. Experimental unit 2015 [[Accessed 04-10-2021]]. Available from: http://www.3rs-reduction.co.uk/html/3__the_experimental_unit.html.
Li F, Liu K-F, Silva MD, Omae T, Sotak CH, Fenstermacher JD, et al. Transient and permanent resolution of ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after brief periods of focal ischemia in rats: correlation with histopathology. Open Access Articles. 2001;1662.
Nielsen NR, Kristensen TS, Schnohr P, Grønbæk M. Perceived stress and cause-specific mortality among men and women: results from a prospective cohort study. American journal of epidemiology. 2008;168(5):481–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hamer M, Kivimaki M, Stamatakis E, Batty GD. Psychological distress and infectious disease mortality in the general population. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2019;76:280–3.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strong R, Miller RA, Astle CM, Baur JA, de Cabo R, Fernandez E, et al. Evaluation of resveratrol, green tea extract, curcumin, oxaloacetic acid, and medium-chain triglyceride oil on life span of genetically heterogeneous mice. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2012;68(1):6–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, Palacios HH, Mote PL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, et al. Metformin improves healthspan and lifespan in mice. Nature communications. 2013;4(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Saltaji H, Armijo-Olivo S, Cummings GG, Amin M, Da Costa BR, Flores-Mir C. Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions. BMC medical research methodology. 2018;18(1):1–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Reichlin TS, Vogt L, Würbel H. The researchers’ view of scientific rigor—survey on the conduct and reporting of in vivo research. PloS one. 2016;11(12):e0165999.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Clough G. Environmental effects on animals used in biomedical research. Biological Reviews. 1982;57(3):487–523.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnston N, Nevalainen T, Hau J. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science (Book 1); 2010.
Google Scholar
Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997;386(6624):493–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Neural consequences of enviromental enrichment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2000;1(3):191–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care. CCAC policy statement on: categories of invasiveness in animal experiments, CCAC, Ottawa ON. 1991.
Animal Welfare Act. USDA Policy #11: Painful and Distressful Procedures. USDA. Issue Date: 1343 March 25, 2011 References: AWA Section 2143, 9 CFR, Part 2, Sections 2.1344 31(d)(1)(i,ii,iv), 2.31(e)(4), 2.36(b)(5,6,7).
Duncan I, Olsson I. Environmental enrichment: from flawed concept to pseudoscience; 2001.
Google Scholar
Barbee RW, Turner PV. Incorporating laboratory animal science into responsible biomedical research. ILAR journal. 2019;60(1):9–16.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wolfer DP, Litvin O, Morf S, Nitsch RM, Lipp H-P, Würbel H. Cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature. 2004;432(7019):821–2.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
André V, Gau C, Scheideler A, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, Amarie OV, Becker L, et al. Laboratory mouse housing conditions can be improved using common environmental enrichment without compromising data. PLOS Biology. 2018;16(4):e2005019.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kola I, Landis J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2004;3(8):711–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Paul SM, Mytelka DS, Dunwiddie CT, Persinger CC, Munos BH, Lindborg SR, et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2010;9(3):203–14.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nature biotechnology. 2014;32(1):40–51.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. Journal of Health Economics. 2016;47:20–33.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics. 2019;20(2):273–86.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
David JM, Chatziioannou AF, Taschereau R, Wang H, Stout DB. The hidden cost of housing practices: using noninvasive imaging to quantify the metabolic demands of chronic cold stress of laboratory mice. Comparative Medicine. 2013;63(5):386–91.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Voelkl B, Würbel H. A reaction norm perspective on reproducibility. Theory in Biosciences. 2021;140(2):169–76.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Muhammad MS, Magaji RA, Mohammed A, Isa A-S, Magaji MG. Effect of resveratrol and environmental enrichment on biomarkers of oxidative stress in young healthy mice. Metabolic Brain Disease. 2017;32(1):163–70.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
David A, Costa JR, Cracchiolo AD, Bachstetter TF, Hughes KR, Bales SM, Paul RF, Mervis Gary W, Arendash HP . Enrichment improves cognition in AD mice by amyloid-related and unrelated mechanisms. Neurobiology of Aging. 2007;28(6):831-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.04.009.
Scafidi J, Ritter J, Talbot BM, Edwards J, Chew L-J, Gallo V. Age-dependent cellular and behavioral deficits induced by molecularly targeted drugs are reversible. Cancer research. 2018;78(8):2081–95.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jeffers MS, Hoyles A, Morshead C, Corbett D. Epidermal growth factor and erythropoietin infusion accelerate functional recovery in combination with rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1856–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gurfein BT, Davidenko O, Premenko-Lanier M, Milush JM, Acree M, Dallman MF, et al. Environmental enrichment alters splenic immune cell composition and enhances secondary influenza vaccine responses in mice. Molecular Medicine. 2014;20(1):179–90.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Swaisgood R, Sheperdson D. Environmental enrichment as a strategy for mitigating stereotypies in zoo animals: a literature review and meta-analysis. In: Mason G, Rushen J, editors. Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI; 2006.
Van Loo PL, Blom HJ, Meijer MK, Baumans V. Assessment of the use of two commercially available environmental enrichments by laboratory mice by preference testing. Laboratory animals. 2005;39(1):58–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garner JP, Mason GJ. Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents. Behavioural Brain Research. 2002;136(1):83–92.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Richter SH, Garner JP, Auer C, Kunert J, Würbel H. Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments. Nature Methods. 2010;7(3):167–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Voelkl B, Altman NS, Forsman A, Forstmeier W, Gurevitch J, Jaric I, et al. Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2020;21(7):384–93.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Diniz DG, Foro CAR, Sosthenes MCK, Demachki S, Gomes GF, Malerba GA, et al. Aging and environmental enrichment exacerbate inflammatory response on antibody-enhanced Dengue disease in immunocompetent murine model. European Journal of Inflammation. 2013;11(3):719–31.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gomes GF, Peixoto R, Maciel BG, Santos KFD, Bayma LR, Feitoza Neto PA, et al. Differential microglial morphological response, TNFα, and viral load in sedentary-like and active murine models after systemic non-neurotropic Dengue virus infection. The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society. 2019;67(6):419–39.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brod S, Gobbetti T, Gittens B, Ono M, Perretti M. D’Acquisto F. The impact of environmental enrichment on the murine inflammatory immune response. JCI insight. 2017;2(7).
Singhal G, Morgan J, Corrigan F, Toben C, Jawahar MC, Jaehne EJ, et al. Short-term environmental enrichment is a stronger modulator of brain glial cells and cervical lymph node t cell subtypes than exercise or combined exercise and enrichment. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2021;41:469–86.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pence BD, Ryerson MR, Bravo Cruz AG, Woods JA, Shisler JL. Voluntary wheel running does not alter mortality to or immunogenicity of vaccinia virus in mice: a pilot study. Frontiers in Physiology. 2018;8(1123).
Soldin OP, Mattison DR. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2009;48(3):143–57.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zopf Y, Rabe C, Neubert A, Gaßmann KG, Rascher W, Hahn EG, et al. Women encounter ADRs more often than do men. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2008;64(10):999.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Karp NA, Reavey N. Sex bias in preclinical research and an exploration of how to change the status quo. British journal of pharmacology. 2019;176(21):4107–18.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Krohn T, Sørensen D, Ottesen J, Hansen A. The effects of individual housing on mice and rats: a review. Animal Welfare. 2006;15(4):343–52.
CAS
Google Scholar
Begni V, Sanson A, Pfeiffer N, Brandwein C, Inta D, Talbot SR, et al. Social isolation in rats: Effects on animal welfare and molecular markers for neuroplasticity. PloS one. 2020;15(10):e0240439.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Arakawa H. Ethological approach to social isolation effects in behavioral studies of laboratory rodents. Behavioural brain research. 2018;341:98–108.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences. 2010;33(2-3):61–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Webster MM, Rutz C. How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature comment. 2020;337-340.