Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of the regressions of natural log OCW (in mm) against natural log body mass (in g)

From: Occipital condyle width (OCW) is a highly accurate predictor of body mass in therian mammals

Dataset

N

Equation

r2adj

%PE

CF

%PEcf

%SEE

All species

404

ln(body mass) = 7.69289 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.19502

0.9810

32.03

1.047

31.09

47.69

Therians only

401

ln(body mass) = 7.70727 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.21527

0.9823

31.55

1.037

30.83

45.92

Excluding taxa

374

ln(body mass) = 7.76568 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.36414

0.9862

27.89

1.021

27.47

40.62

All species (N ≥ 6)

170

ln(body mass) = 7.68862 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.18776

0.9785

29.77

1.065

28.69

43.99

All species (N ≥ 6), excluding taxa

160

ln(body mass) = 7.76999 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.2391

0.9815

27.72

1.068

26.56

41.30

All species (N ≥ 10)

75

ln(body mass) = 7.71479 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.19504

0.9901

22.57

1.041

22.53

32.76

All species (N ≥ 10), excluding taxa

73

ln(body mass) = 7.71406 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.21147

0.9916

20.71

1.042

20.66

30.14

Species >  1000 g

232

ln(body mass) = 7.4292 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 7.5507

0.9526

30.76

1.080

30.04

46.17

Australidelphia

32

ln(body mass) = 8.1213 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.9050

0.9720

31.30

1.025

30.54

47.44

Ungulates

61

ln(body mass) = 7.6451 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.0565

0.9619

27.62

1.057

27.47

39.95

Primates

44

ln(body mass) = 8.2761 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 9.5675

0.9636

18.75

1.029

18.06

28.41

Rodentia

96

ln(body mass) = 7.8157 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 8.2573

0.9710

29.35

1.078

29.19

40.80

Sciuromorpha

29

ln(body mass) = 8.2497 × ln(OCW) 2/3 − 9.1570

0.9726

16.63

1.039

16.45

24.37

Carnivora

81

ln(body mass) = 8.5852 × ln(OCW)2/3 − 10.2696

0.9750

22.60

1.031

21.96

34.62

  1. Excluded datasets refer to analyses where groups with apomorphic occiput morphology (Monotremata, Cingulata, Dermoptera, Lagomorpha, Caviidae, Dinomyidae, and Dipodomys) were removed from the calculation. All abbreviations follow Table 3