Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Interaction between phenylpropane metabolism and oil accumulation in the developing seed of Brassica napus revealed by high temporal-resolution transcriptomes

BMC Biology volume 21, Article number: 202 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Brassica napus is an important oilseed crop providing high-quality vegetable oils for human consumption and non-food applications. However, the regulation between embryo and seed coat for the synthesis of oil and phenylpropanoid compounds remains largely unclear.

Results

Here, we analyzed the transcriptomes in developing seeds at 2-day intervals from 14 days after flowering (DAF) to 64 DAF. The 26 high-resolution time-course transcriptomes are clearly clustered into five distinct groups from stage I to stage V. A total of 2217 genes including 136 transcription factors, are specifically expressed in the seed and show high temporal specificity by being expressed only at certain stages of seed development. Furthermore, we analyzed the co-expression networks during seed development, which mainly included master regulatory transcription factors, lipid, and phenylpropane metabolism genes. The results show that the phenylpropane pathway is prominent during seed development, and the key enzymes in the phenylpropane metabolic pathway, including TT5, BAN, and the transporter TT19, were directly or indirectly related to many key enzymes and transcription factors involved in oil accumulation. We identified candidate genes that may regulate seed oil content based on the co-expression network analysis combined with correlation analysis of the gene expression with seed oil content and seed coat content.

Conclusions

Overall, these results reveal the transcriptional regulation between lipid and phenylpropane accumulation during B. napus seed development. The established co-expression networks and predicted key factors provide important resources for future studies to reveal the genetic control of oil accumulation in B. napus seeds.

Background

As an important oil crop, rapeseed (Brassica napus; AACC, 2n = 38) originates from a hybridization between Brassica rapa (AA, 2n = 20) and Brassica oleracea (CC, 2n = 18). Rapeseed oil is widely accepted for human consumption and as a raw material for industrial use [1]. An increasing evidence also supports rapeseed oil as a health-promoting dietary ingredient [2]. In recent years, the demand for vegetable oil has increased sharply, and improving oil yield and quality has become a major breeding goal for B. napus. One of the important traits is the seed color, which is determined by the deposition of pigments in the seed coat. Compared with black-seeded rapeseed, yellow-seeded rapeseed has the advantages of thin seed coat, low content of anti-nutritional factors, high content of protein and oil, and clear oil color [3,4,5], making yellow seed a favorable trait in B. napus. However, limited progress has been made in the regulatory mechanisms of oil accumulation in rapeseed and its coordination with the metabolism for seed coat development.

Seed development is a complex and dynamic process consisting of the development of the zygotic embryo and endosperm and the maternally derived seed coat [6]. Seed development can be roughly divided into three stages including embryogenesis, maturation, and desiccation. The process of seed development usually begins with cell division and tissue differentiation during embryonic development. Accumulation of storage reserves, mainly protein and oil in the form of triacylglycerol (TAG), happens in the maturation stage followed by a desiccation/quiescence phase to produce dry oilseeds [7]. Typically, B. napus seeds contain 40% oil and 15% protein [8]. As the major storage reserve in seeds, TAG is assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) under the action of glycerol-3-P acyltransferases using glycerol-3-P and fatty acids (FAs) originally synthesized in the plastid [9,10,11].

Seed coat serves as a protective function throughout development. It also releases nutrients and transmits signals from the maternal tissues to the embryo, which are necessary for proper embryo development [12]. The accumulation of seed coat-specific flavonoids, mainly the phenylpropane compounds cyanidin and procyanidins (PAs) [13, 14], is a characteristic step of seed maturation in many species [15]. The contents of these compounds determine the color of mature B. napus seed. Cyanidin and procyanidins, together with flavonols, phlobaphenes, and isoflavones, all belong to flavonoids that possess a common C6-C3-C6 body [16]. The seed coat contents of flavonol and procyanidin in the black-seeded varieties are higher than those of the yellow-seeded varieties [13]. In B. napus, the soluble procyanidin content increases throughout the seed development to reach a maximum level during the early seed maturation stage (30 day after pollination (DAF)) and then decreases dramatically and concomitantly with the onset of seed browning (from 40 DAF onward), followed by a maximum level of insoluble procyanidin accumulation [17]. The accumulation of these flavonoids in the seed coat competes with the same nutrients supplied by the parent plant for the synthesis of storage reserves in the embryo and endosperm. For example, malonyl-CoA is a substrate for the synthesis of both flavonoids and FAs [18]. A regulatory mechanism is therefore required to coordinate the carbon partitioning for these metabolic pathways in the seed.

Several transcription factors that regulate seed coat development have been identified in Arabidopsis, including the TRANSPARENT TESTA (TT) genes, which encode MYB and bHLH transcriptional factors [15]. These MYB and bHLH proteins, together with TTG1 (WD40 family protein), can form ternary protein complexes named MBW [19], although the functions of the MBW complexes are not yet fully understood and additional transcription factors may interact with AC-rich MYB-binding sites [20]. The specific accumulation of PAs in the innermost cell layer of the seed coat involves at least four MBW complexes with partially overlapping functions [21]. Ectopic expression of MBW partners can activate not only the late biosynthetic genes, but also the entire flavonoid pathway [21, 22]. Previous comparative transcriptomic analysis in seed coats shows that genes in the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways are downregulated in yellow seed coats compared to brown-seeded rapeseed [23]. Consistent with this, altered flavonoid metabolism in the seed coat affects the content and composition of storage compounds in the embryo. The BnTT8 double mutants produce seeds with increased seed oil and protein content and altered FA composition [24], while yellow seed coat in Brassica species is also due to the loss of function of the TT8 gene [25, 26]. Silencing of BnTT1 resulted in a significant decrease in oleic acid (C18:1) and a notable increase in linoleic acid (C18:2) and linolenic acid (C18:3) in mature seeds [27]. These reported mutants are all accompanied by the changes in seed coat color and FA content, suggesting a negative correlation between seed coat flavonoid and FA accumulation.

In this work, we aimed to investigate the genetic mechanisms that may regulate the metabolic pathways for flavonoid and oil biosynthesis during seed development in B. napus. We analyzed a large set of rapeseed transcriptomes at 26 time points with a 2-day interval resolution during seed development. Combining the co-expression network analysis and the association studies of seed oil content (SOC) and seed coat content (SCC) in a natural variation population, we found that there was a wide range of co-expression between phenylpropane metabolism genes and oil content-related genes. A few phenylpropane metabolism genes were found to be inversely correlated with SOC. Our study provides new insights into the transcriptional regulation of carbon source competition between seed coat and embryo during B. napus seed development.

Results

The generation of seed transcriptomes of B. napus

Previously, we performed RNA-seq of 91 different rapeseed tissues from different developmental stages and constructed the BnTIR online server [28, 29], which has been integrated into BnIR [30]. In this database, 1.71 billion high-quality reads were generated from developing seeds (14–64 DAF with 2-day intervals) using the Illumina sequencing platform. These reads were then mapped to the ZS11 reference genome [31, 32] (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). On average, 96.6% of the reads were mapped (Additional file 2: Table S1), which were then used to calculate the normalized gene expression level as transcripts per million mapped reads (TPM). The sequencing data of the biological replicates were of high quality with Pearson correlation coefficients (R2) > 0.90, and seed development was clustered into several stages according to the distribution of high correlations (Additional file 1: Fig. S2, Fig. S3a; Additional file 2: Table S2). Thus, we took the average TPM value of three replicates as the expression level for each tissue.

Seed transcriptomes are distinguished in five seed developmental stages

With hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), these high-density time-series transcriptomes could be generally divided into five clusters, with each cluster corresponding to a specific developmental stage, consistent with the previously reported timing of embryogenesis (stage I), seed filling (stages II and III, rapid accumulation period and stable period), preparatory desiccation phase (stage IV), and desiccation (stage V) during seed development (Fig. 1a, b; Additional file 1: Fig. S3b) [7, 33]. By quantifying the total FAs in developing seeds, we found that the total FAs started to accumulate around 20 DAF (stage I), followed by a period of rapid accumulation after 30 DAF (stage II), and reached a stable level before it started to decrease around 60 DAF (stage V) (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Transcriptome analysis of the 26 time points of B. napus seed development. a Cluster dendrogram showing five distinct development stages: embryogenesis, seed filling (rapid accumulation period and stable period), maturation, and desiccation during seed development. b Graphic representation of the FA content at five distinct seed development stages. A time course of major storage compound (e.g., seed storage lipid and protein) contents are shown in parallel. c Genes mainly expressed at the five different stages. The time points belong to the stages of embryogenesis, rapid seed filling, stable seed filling, maturation, and desiccation are shown in light yellow, light purple, deep yellow, green, and blue, respectively

Full size image

In order to further explore the characteristics of physiological changes during seed development, we analyzed the genes specifically expressed in seeds by Tau. A total of 5506 seed-specific expressed genes were identified, including 507 transcription factors (Additional file 1: Fig. S4; Additional file 2: Table S3). The genes specifically expressed at different stages were also screened according to the gene expression profile in seeds (Additional file 2: Table S4). For example, the genes from 14 to 24 DAF formed the first cluster, which represented the later stage of embryogenesis (stage I). Transcription factor LEAFY COTYLEDON 2 (LEC2) that contains a B3 domain, a DNA-binding motif unique to plants and characteristic of several transcription factors, plays critical roles in both early and late embryo development [34]. LEC2, which is mainly expressed during seed development, is required for the maintenance of suspensor morphology, specification of cotyledon identity, progression through the maturation phase, and suppression of premature germination [35]. TRANSPARENT TESTA 2 (TT2; MYB123) is expressed in embryos at an early developmental stage in Arabidopsis seeds and regulates embryonic FA biosynthesis by targeting FUSCA3 (FUS3) [36]. Several homologs of these two genes showed high expression after 14 DAF, but rapidly decreased after 26 DAF (Fig. 1c; Additional file 1: Fig. S5a), suggesting that BnLEC2s and BnTT2s might be important for embryonic morphologic development. Similarly, the genes from 26–32 DAF, 34–44 DAF, 46–52 DAF, and 54–64 DAF samples formed the second to fifth clusters, representing the stages of seed filling (rapid accumulation period, stage II), stable stage of seed filling (stage III), preparatory phase of seed desiccation (stage IV), and seed desiccation (stage V), respectively (Fig. 1c; Additional file 1: Fig. S5b-h). During these phases, the lipid biosynthesis genes (e.g., Biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP), MOSAIC DEATH 1 (MOD1)), seed storage protein genes (e.g., 2S albumins 3 (2S3), Oleosin1 (OLEO1)), and phenylpropane metabolism pathway genes (e.g., TRANSPARENT TESTA 12 (TT12), BANYULS/ANTHOCYANIDIN REDUCTASE (BAN/ANR)) were expressed (Additional file 1: Fig. S5; Additional file 2: Table S4). The temporal expression patterns of these genes in the five stages suggest their functions in FA biosynthesis and other metabolic processes during seed development and maturation.

Co-expression network analysis highlights the gene modules of five stages

The high temporal-resolution transcriptomes provided us with a good opportunity to identify genes and gene networks in different seed developmental stages that may provide information on the gene functions and genetic control of developmental phase transition. We then performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify highly interconnected modules of co-expressed genes in 26 seed developmental transcriptomes [37]. Modules were defined as clusters of highly interconnected genes and genes within the same cluster that had high correlation coefficients. The WGCNA analysis resulted in 17 distinct modules (labeled by different colors) composed of 14,964 genes (Additional file 2: Table S5) including 1265 transcription factors, 707 acyl-lipid-related genes (Additional file 2: Table S6), and 27 phenylalanine-related genes (Additional file 2: Table S7), in which each tree branch constitutes a module and each leaf in the branch is one gene (Additional file 1: Fig. S6a). The module eigengene was the first principal component of a given module and could be considered a representative of the module’s gene expression profile. The 17 module eigengenes for the 17 distinct modules were each correlated with distinct stage types due to eigengenes’ time-specific expression profiles. Notably, 5 out of the 17 co-expression modules comprised genes that were highly expressed in a single stage, and each of the five stages of developing seeds had a specific module (Fig. 2a, b; Additional file 1: Fig. S6b; Additional file 2: Table S5).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Co-expression network and function enrichment of five stages of seed development in B. napus. a Expression patterns of genes in five co-expression modules. For each gene, the TPM value normalized by the maximum value of all TPM values of the gene over all time points is shown. The number of genes and the transcription factors in each module are shown on the left. b Co-expression network of genes involved at the five stages of seed development in B. napus. Representative genes with known functions and TF genes involved in acyl-lipid metabolism are labeled. c MapMan function enrichment of genes at the five stages of seed development

Full size image

To further understand the functional characteristics of the five stages, we performed gene enrichment analysis for five stages and modules with MapMan (v3.6.0) [38]. In the five developmental stages, 84 significantly enriched MapMan terms were identified among all genes, showing highly stage-dependent patterns. Therefore, each of these five modules identifies (or correlates with) a specific stage cluster of genes (Fig. 2b, c; Additional file 1: Fig. S7; Additional file 2: Tables S8-S12). For example, the floral white module in stage I involved 4088 genes including 353 transcription factors (Fig. 2b, c; Additional file 2: Table S8), and the brown2 module in stage II identified 1392 genes including 135 transcription factors (Fig. 2b, c; Additional file 2: Table S9). Embryonic development-associated terms, “mitosis and meiosis,” “homologous recombination repair,” “cyclin activities,” “DNA replication,” and “cell wall organization,” were enriched in stage I (Fig. 2c; Additional file 2: Table S8), and “plastidial FA synthase,” “photosystem I,” “acetyl-CoA generation,” and “pyruvate kinase” were enriched in stage II (Fig. 2c; Additional file 2: Table S9).

The phenylpropane metabolism pathway-related genes are associated with SOC in B. napus

The high temporal-resolution transcriptomes allowed us to investigate the expression of different genes in the process of seed development. During seed development, many metabolites are accumulated or consumed and accompanied by changes in appearance, such as the color of the seed coat changed from light green to black due to the accumulation of oxidized PAs (Fig. 3a). We previously sequenced 583 seed transcriptomes of a natural B. napus population at two developmental stages and identified 692 genes significantly associated with SOC by transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) [39,40,41]. We wonder whether the genes related to phenylpropane metabolism are associated with seed oil content. We used two methods to integrate the results from TWAS and co-expression networks (see the “Methods” section). In total, 12 hub genes were detected simultaneously by two methods (Fig. 3b; Additional file 2: Table S13-14).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Procyanidin biosynthesis pathway was prominent during seed development. a Seed samples from 16 to 60 DAF (bar = 0.5 mm). b Manhattan plot of TWAS results (FDR < 0.05; [39]) for SOC. Genes with the expression positively or negatively correlated with SOC are plotted above or under the black bold line. Each point represents a single gene tested. The yellow points indicate overlapped genes between the co-expression network hub genes and TWAS-significant genes. c TWAS-significant genes (FDR < 0.05) involved in PAs and lignin biosynthesis pathway are marked in red, and the FDRs are shown in blue circles. d Co-expression network of TT5, BAN, TT19, and TT1. Circles in orange represent acyl-lipid genes, and circles in green represent transcription factor genes. Correlation between the expression (TPM) of BnaC08.TT5 with oil content (e) and seed coat content (h). Box plots for oil content (f) and seed coat content (i) for the two haplotypes (n = 267 versus 91). g Box plots for the expressions for the two haplotypes (n = 135 versus 62). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × the interquartile range; dots, outliers (P < 2e − 16, Student’s t test)

Full size image

As expected, several genes related to procyanidins, such as TRANSPARENT TESTA 1 (TT1), TT5 (CHALCONE ISOMERASE (CHI)), TT19 (GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE PHI 12 (GSTF12)), and BANYULS (BAN), were significantly associated with SOC (Fig. 3b; Additional file 2: Table S14). TT5 and BAN are key enzymes in PA biosynthesis, while TT19 is a PA transporter (Fig. 3c). These three genes were co-expressed with hundreds of genes including acyl-lipid-related genes such as LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 (LEC1, NFYB9), LEC2, WRINKLED 1 (WRI1), NON-SPECIFIC PHOSPHOLIPASE C2 (NPC2), PICKLE (PKL), LACS6, and DIACYLGLYCEROL KINASE 6 (DGK6), as well as lipid degradation genes such as LACS6, GDSL (AT1G71250), and lipase (AT1G18460) (Fig. 3d; Additional file 2: Table S15-S16; Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Interestingly, we found that the expression of TT5 (BnaC08G0351900ZS, BnaC08.TT5), BAN (BnaA03G0584100ZS, BnaA03.BAN), and TT19 (BnaC09G0492500ZS, BnaC09.TT19) was negatively associated with SOC (Fig. 3e; Additional file 1: Fig. S9a-c) and highly expressed at the early stage of seed development (Additional file 1: Fig. S9d-i). In the natural population of B. napus, two major haplotypes, hap.TCTCT and hap.CGCTA, were identified in BnaC08.TT5 (Additional file 1: Fig. S10a). In hap.CGCTA, the mutations of five bases were identified referring to hap.TCTCT, which caused five missense mutations of amino acids from T-G-N-E-Q to A-A-S-K-H (Additional file 1: Fig. S10a). The SOC of hap.TCTCT accessions was significantly higher than that of hap.CGCTA accessions (Fig. 3f), while the expression of BnaC08.TT5 hap.TCTCT accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.CGCTA accessions (Fig. 3g). TT5 functions as a key enzyme involved in the synthesis of flavonoids, which may influence the deposition of these compounds in the seed coat [42]. We therefore analyzed the correlation between TT5 and SCC. As predicted, the expression of BnaC08.TT5 was positively correlated with SCC (Fig. 3h), and the SCC of hap.TCTCT accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.CGCTA accessions (Fig. 3i). These results suggest that BnaC08.TT5 is negatively associated with SOC and positively associated with SCC.

It has been shown that the content of phenylpropane metabolites in the seed coat, such as flavonoids and lignin, determines the color and SCC, which are closely correlated with oil content [43,44,45,46]. To further analyze the transcriptional regulation between phenylpropane metabolism and oil accumulation, the co-expression network was constructed using all phenylpropane metabolite synthesis genes. Among the top 100 hub genes, the expression of 36 genes was correlated with SCC in the natural population [47]. Among them, the expression of twenty genes was significantly correlated with SOC and SCC (Fig. 4a; Table 1). For example, BnaA08.ACLA-3 (BnaA08G0294900ZS) was positively associated with SCC (Fig. 4b). ACLA-3 encodes subunit A of the heteromeric enzyme ATP citrate lyase (ACL) that converts citrate to acetyl-CoA, which serves both as an immediate substrate for de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and an allosteric inhibitor of FAs oxidation [48]. There were two major haplotypes of BnaA08.ACLA-3, hap.CGGGCGG and hap.ACTAGTA, in the natural population (Fig. 4c). In hap.ACTAGTA, the mutations of seven bases were identified referring to hap.CGGGCGG, which caused seven missense mutations of amino acids from A-P–T-D-F-G-R to S-A-N–N-L-V-K (Additional file 1: Fig. S10b). The expression of hap.ACGGGCGG accessions was significantly higher than that of hap.AACTAGTA accessions (Fig. 4d). While BnaA08.ACLA-3 was negatively associated with SCC (Fig. 4e), the SOC of hap.ACGGGCGG accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.AACTAGTA accessions (Fig. 4f). These results suggest that the expression of BnaA08.ACLA-3 was correlated with SOC and SCC.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Co-expression analysis of phenylpropane metabolic genes. a Co-expression network of Hub genes in the phenylpropanoid genes network. Correlation between expression (TPM) of BnaA08.ACLA-3 with seed coat content (b) and oil content (e). Box plots for seed coat content (c) and oil content (f) for the two haplotypes (n = 292 versus 48). d Box plots for the expressions for the two haplotypes (n = 231 versus 29). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × the interquartile range; dots, outliers (P < 2e − 16, Student’s t test)

Full size image
Table 1 Summary of candidate genes having a significant correlation with seed oil content and seed coat content in the co-expression network of phenylpropane-related genes
Full size table

The FA metabolism-related genes are associated with SCC in B. napus

Four homologs of LEC2, three homologs of LEC1, and one homolog of WRI1 were co-expressed with TT5, TT19, and BAN (Fig. 3d; Additional file 2: Table S15). Different homologs in B. napus may function in a coordinated way [49]. The co-expression correlation between LEC1 and LEC2 homologs was strong (Additional file 1: Fig. S11a), as 96.88–99.74%, and 90.38–99.92% of the genes were present in at least two co-expressed networks of LEC1 and LEC2 homologs, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S11b, c). LEC1, LEC2, and WRI1, together with FUS3, ABSCISIC ACIDINSENTIVE3 (ABI3), and other transcription factors, constitute the core regulatory network of FA biosynthesis [34, 50,51,52,53,54,55,56] (Fig. 5a). Subsequently, we constructed the gene regulatory network of these two genes with an incorporated connection (Fig. 5b). In addition, the gene regulatory network connects LEC1, LEC2, and WRI1 with their co-expressed genes including a number of acyl-lipid related genes such as VIVIPAROUS1/ABI3-LIKE1 (VAL1), DNA-BINDING WITH ONE FINGER 4 (DOF4), PKL, NPC2, and DGK6 (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Co-expression network of key transcription factors of FA biosynthesis and haplotypes for the gene DOF4.4 (BnaA03G0459300ZS). a Simplified regulatory network of FA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The blue line indicates a positive relationship. The red dashed line indicates a negative relationship. b Co-expression network of LEC1, LEC2, and WRI1. To avoid duplication, networks of different homolog genes are incorporated. Circles in orange represent acyl-lipid genes, and circles in green represent the transcription factor genes. Correlation between the expression (TPM) of BnaA03.DOF4.4 with oil content (c) and seed coat content (f). Box plots for oil content (d) and seed coat content (g) for the two haplotypes (n = 238 versus 22). e Box plots for the expression for the two haplotypes (n = 185 versus 20). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × the interquartile range; dots, outliers (P < 2e − 16, Student’s t test)

Full size image

In the co-expression network of FA biosynthesis genes, 84 genes were significantly correlated with SOC and SCC (Additional file 2: Table S17). As expected, B. napus LEC1, LEC2, and WRI1 were positively associated with SOC (Fig. 5c; Additional file 1: Fig. S12a-c). The expression peak of these genes was different (LEC2, 14 to 32 DAF; LEC1, 14 to 40 DAF; WRI1, 14 to 56 DAF) (Additional file 1: Fig. S12d-i), whereas other acyl-lipid-related genes including NPC2, LACS6, and DGK6 were mainly expressed during stages I–II (Additional file 1: Fig. S13). All these genes were almost no longer expressed after 56 DAF, consistent with the FA accumulation at stage V (Fig. 1b). Besides the acyl-lipid-related genes, transcription factors of the MYB, WRKY, bHLH, and ZAT families also appeared in the co-expression networks. Among them, MYB118 has been reported to repress the expression of maturation-related genes in the endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds [57, 58]. ZAT4 is a typical C2H2-type transcription factor that plays an important role in stress tolerance [59, 60]. BnaA04G.ZAT4 (BnaA04G0285000ZS) showed a negative correlation with SOC and a positive correlation with SCC; the SOC of hap.CA accessions were significantly higher than that of hap.TG accessions, while the expression and the SCC of hap.CA accessions were significantly lower than that of hap.TG accessions (Additional file 1: Fig. S14). Plant-specific DNA-binding with one finger (DOF)-type transcription factors regulate various biological processes [61,62,63]. AtDOF4.4 plays major roles in shoot branching and seed/silique development [63]. We found that BnaA03.DOF4.4 (BnaA03G0459300ZS) was positively associated with SOC. BnaA03.DOF4.4 contained two haplotypes; in hap.AAG, the mutations of three bases were identified referring to hap.TGA, which caused three missense mutations of amino acids from V-S-M to D-N-V (Additional file 1: Fig. S15). The SOC of hap.TGA accessions was significantly higher than that of hap.AAG accessions (Fig. 5d), while the expression of hap.AAG accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.TGA accessions (Fig. 5e). Interestingly, BnaA03.DOF4.4 was negatively associated with SCC (Fig. 5f), and the SCC of hap.TGA accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.AAG accessions (Fig. 5g). Another DOF gene BnaC01.DOF4.7 also showed similar correlations with SOC and SCC as DOF4.4 (Additional file 1: Fig. S16).

We also constructed the co-expression network using FA biosynthesis genes [64]. In the top 100 hub genes, the expression of 17 genes was correlated with SCC in the natural population. Among them, the expression of twelve genes was significantly correlated with both SOC and SCC, and the co-expression networks of these genes were further mapped (Fig. 4a; Additional file 2: Table S18). Many FA synthesis genes were co-expressed with these hub genes, including BCCP2, FAD2, FATA2, KAS1, and WRI1 (Fig. 6a). Correlation analysis of genes with oil content showed that BnaC07.MORC7 was positively correlated with SOC (Fig. 6b). In Arabidopsis, MORC family ATPases catalyze changes in chromatin structure, inducing gene silencing via RNA-directed DNA methylation, and MORC7 can suppress genes in a methylation-independent manner [65, 66]. At the population level, two major haplotypes, hap.AGAATC and hap.TCTGAT, were identified in BnaC07.MORC7 (Fig. 6c). In hap.TCTGAT, the mutations of six bases were identified referring to hap.AGAATC, causing six missense mutations of amino acids from I-S-M–K-S-P to F-T-L-E-R-L (Additional file 1: Fig. S17a). The expression of hap.AGAATC accessions was significantly higher than that of hap.TCTGAT accessions (Fig. 6d), while the SOC of hap.AGAATC accessions was significantly higher than that of hap.TCTGAT accessions (Fig. 6c). Meanwhile, BnaC07.MORC7 was negatively associated with SCC (Fig. 6e). The SCC of hap.AGAATC accessions was significantly lower than that of hap.TCTGAT accessions (Fig. 6f). Similarly, BnaC01.PGI1 (BnaC01G0181100ZS), a paralog of Arabidopsis PGI1, shows correlations with SOC and SCC, containing two major haplotypes in natural population including hap.GTCCCGAAG and hap.TGTATAGCA (Fig. 6g–k). In a natural population, in hap.TGTATAGCA, the mutations of nine bases were identified referring to hap.GTCCCGAAG, which caused four missense mutations of amino acids from E-V-M-T to K-A-R-I (Additional file 1: Fig. S17b). These results suggest that the expression of some genes related to FA biosynthesis also affects the SCC.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Co-expression analysis of FA biosynthesis hub genes correlated with both SOC and SCC. a Co-expression network of hub genes in the acyl-lipid genes network. Correlation between the expression (TPM) of BnaC07.MORC7 with oil content (b) and seed coat content (e). Box plots for oil content (c) and seed coat content (f) for the two haplotypes (n = 177 versus 195). d Box plots for the expressions for the two haplotypes (n = 102 versus 105). Correlation between the expression (TPM) of BnaC01.PGI1 with oil content (g) and seed coat content (j). Box plots for oil content (h) and seed coat content (k) for the two haplotypes (n = 131 versus 165). i Box plots for the expressions for the two haplotypes (n = 76 versus 81). Center line, median; box limits, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × the interquartile range; dots, outliers (P < 2e − 16, Student’s t test)

Full size image

Prediction of candidate transcription factors which impact SOC

To investigate whether the 507 seed-specific expressed transcription factors modulate FA biosynthesis, we analyzed seed-specific TF genes, TWAS-significant SOC genes, and co-expression network hub genes. The results showed that 309 TF genes were among TWAS-significant genes or co-expression network hub genes (Additional file 2: Table S19), and 51 of them were significantly correlated with SOC (Fig. 7a; Additional file 1: Fig. S18a-c; Additional file 2: Table S20). Among these overlapping seed-specific transcription factors, the top three were EIL5, ERF12, and GATA19, which were predicted to interact with 572, 519, and 341 genes, respectively (Fig. 7b; Additional file 2: Table S21). These three TFs were all highly expressed in stage V (Additional file 1: Fig. S18a-c). As shown in Fig. 7b, EIL5, ERF12, and GATA19 and their co-expressed genes formed a closely related community. There were 968 genes including 28 acyl-lipid-related genes (LACS7, SDP1L, LIP2, KAS, FATA, HSD1, OPR1, PI4KG4, and PLC1) that were predicted to be simultaneously regulated by EIL5, ERF12, and GATA19 (Additional file 2: Tables S21, 22). A total of 23 genes were simultaneously regulated by EIL5, ERF12, and GATA19, and the promoter of 15 genes contained transcription factor-binding sites (TFBS) of EIL, ERF, and GATA (Fig. 7b; Additional file 2: Table S23). Further studies on these transcription factors are required to elucidate their functions in the regulation of SOC.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Novel candidate transcription factors that may regulate SOC. a Correlation between the expression of seed-specific transcription factors (GATA19, EIL5, and ERF12) and SOC. b Genes regulated by network hubs (GATA19, EIL5, and ERF12). Three candidate TF genes are drawn as V’s in purple. Triangles in orange represent acyl-lipid genes, and the diamonds in green represent transcription factor genes

Full size image

Discussion

Seed maturation is characterized by the accumulation of carbon reserves, including carbohydrates, protein, and oil. In B. napus, about 2.2% of genes in the genome are lipid metabolism genes, most of which are highly conserved among different species [67], which is twice as much as in soybean and oil palm [68, 69]. However, the genetic regulation of these genes in B. napus remains unclear, and even less is known about how oil biosynthesis is coordinated with other concurrent metabolic pathways in different compartments. Here, we revealed a high temporal-resolution transcriptome landscape spanning the major periods of seed development in B. napus by sampling at 26 time points from 14 to 64 DAF with 2-day intervals. This large collection of gene expression information provides a rich resource for understanding the genetic control of seed development and for designing effective strategies to increase the yield of storage compounds.

To improve oil yield and quality in rapeseed, yellow seed coat color is considered a desirable trait. Our analysis therefore focuses on the gene networks regulating the biosynthesis of oil in the embryo and specialized metabolites in the seed coat. The pathways for the biosynthesis of storage lipids and seed coat flavonoids are well known, and much knowledge has also been obtained for their genetic regulation [15, 70]. Our comprehensive seed transcriptomes allowed us to decipher the genetic mechanisms that regulate these key metabolic events in a time-dependent manner. Based on the co-expression network analysis of acyl-lipid-related genes across five stages during seed development, 1265 seed-specific transcription factors were identified in 17 modules. In the core module corresponding to the five stages, 135 transcription factors were specifically expressed in stage II, and their functions were enriched in “plastidial FA synthase,” “photosystem I,” “acetyl-CoA generation,” and “pyruvate kinase.” In addition to these transcription factors, several new transcription factors were predicated, such as EIL5, ERF12, and GATA19. In Arabidopsis, ERF12 is involved in floral organ development [71], and GATA transcription factors regulate shoot apical meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis [72, 73]. The expression level of these three transcription factors was highest at the late stage of seed development (Additional file 1: Fig. S18f-h). During the B. napus seed development, these three transcription factors and their interacting genes formed a closely related community, including 18 acyl-lipid-related genes (Fig. 7). These results suggest that these transcription factors might be involved in the FA biosynthesis; it also indicates that genes specifically expressed at stage V are also important for seed oil accumulation.

At the later stage of seed development, the seed lipid content of B. napus can be reduced by 10–14% [74]. This conclusion is supported by our oil content analysis (Fig. 1b), and genes involved in β-oxidation including LACS7, ACX3, and ACX2 were enriched at stage IV (46–52 DAF) of seed development (Fig. 2c; Additional file 2: Table S4). TAG and FAs are catabolized by β-oxidation within the peroxisome to acetyl-CoA [75] and then subsequently converted to succinate via the glyoxylate cycle [76], providing germinating seeds with both carbon skeletons and energy before the seedlings develop the photosynthesis capacity. TAG degradation during Arabidopsis seed desiccation is also thought to be used to support continued metabolism after the carbon input from the maternal tissue has ceased. Indeed, during Arabidopsis embryo maturation, the trophic link between the seed and the maternal parent is lost before metabolic activity ceases [77]. However, the synthesis of storage proteins, the abundant proteins of late embryogenesis, and other metabolic processes associated with seed maturation continue until desiccation [77, 78]. Thus, the metabolism in late embryogenesis resembles that of carbon-deficient tissues in which FAs turnover can be activated [79]. In the embryonic development of B. napus, carbon from FA catabolism is explicitly utilized in the same tissue [74]. Therefore, we propose that during seed desiccation, lipid degradation may reserve intermediates for seed germination and other metabolic processes, while the carbon source competition between phenylpropane metabolism and oil accumulation should occur at the early stage of seed development. We also noticed that many of the candidate genes predicted by the co-expression network to be associated with SOC and SCC were not very highly correlated with both traits. This might be due to the structure of this population, which contains spring, semi-winter, and winter ecotypes [39]. On the other hand, SOC is a complex quantitative genetic trait controlled by multiple minor effect genes, and many factors could affect the SOC [80]. The contribution of each oil-related gene to SOC is small, which requires pyramiding of multiple genes to breed B. napus with high SOC.

The seed coat color is determined by the deposition of the phenylpropane compounds cyanidin and procyanidins (PAs) in their endodermal cells. As the seed coat cells die, PAs are released from the endothelial cells and immersed into the seed coat, giving the seed coat its deep color [15, 81]. PAs and other flavonoids are synthesized through the phenylpropanoid pathway, where phenylalanine is converted to 4-coumaroyl-CoA, which enters the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway to form PAs tannins and lignin [82, 83] (Fig. 3c). Phenylpropanoid homeostasis among different branches of phenylpropanoid metabolism, achieved through the regulation of metabolic flux redirection (MFR), shows extraordinary complexity and a high degree of plasticity during successive developmental stages and in response to environmental stimuli and changes [84]. For example, the balance between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis is regulated by the MdMYB16/MdMYB1-miR7125-MdCCR model integrating light signaling in apple [85]. In Arabidopsis, the flavonoid pathway has been well characterized at the molecular level, mainly using transparent testa (tt) mutants that affect flavonoid accumulation and seed coat color [86,87,88,89]. In B. napus, TT1 and TT8 have also been proven to affect flavonoid accumulation and seed coat color [24, 27].

Previous studies reveal that the seed coat of yellow-seeded B. napus is thinner than the black-seeded type, which contains higher oil and protein content [4]. We hypothesized that the higher oil content in yellow seeds than in brown/dark seeds may have resulted in the favorable carbon partitioning towards the embryo compared to the seed coat, since the synthesis of FAs and pigmentary flavonoid compounds uses the common source of carbon from the parent plant (Fig. 8). Sucrose translocated from photosynthetic tissues is the major carbon source in the developing seed. Hydrolysis of sucrose and subsequent glycolysis produce acetyl-CoA, which can be carboxylated to malonyl-CoA, both of which are substrates for FA biosynthesis, while malonyl-CoA is also used for flavonoid synthesis [18]. These clearly competing metabolic pathways must be tightly regulated to coordinate optimal seed storage reserves and proper seed coat development for protection. Our transcriptome and gene network analyses provide important insights. The dynamic transcriptomes during rapeseed development clearly demonstrated distinct stage-specific gene expression patterns corresponding to the major phases of late embryogenesis and the transition to seed maturation and accumulation of carbon reserves (Fig. 2). As both embryo and seed coat undergo rapid expansion and accumulation of storage compounds during these stages, we found extensive co-expression of key transcription factors and enzymes involved in oil (e.g., LEC2, LEC1, FUS3, and WRI1) and PA biosynthesis (e.g., TT2, TT2, TT19, and BAN). Importantly, we found that many genes involved in phenylpropane metabolism were significantly associated with SOC in the TWAS (Fig. 3c), and the co-expression network of these genes also included key genes involved in oil synthesis (Fig. 3d). PA biosynthesis-related genes such as TT1, TT5 (CHI), TT19 (GSTF12), and BAN were positively correlated with SCC but were negatively correlated with SOC (Additional file 1: Fig. S9a-c; Additional file 2: Table S17). This suggests that the seed coat formation together with flavonoid accumulation competes with FA biosynthesis using the fixed carbon source in the seed, thereby affecting the oil content. Our results are consistent with various evidence showing that the content of phenylpropane metabolites including flavonoids, lignin, and fiber in the seed coat can determine the seed coat color and SCC, which is often accompanied by the change of SOC [43,44,45,46, 90], which supports the above views.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The model of carbon source competition between seed coat and embryo in developing seed of B. napus. During seed development, a part of the carbon source is allocated to the seed coat, and phenylalanine is metabolized into 4-coumarate-CoA to provide one of the substrates (another is malonyl-CoA) for the synthesis of flavonoid compounds and lignin monomers. At the later stage of seed development, oxidized procyanidins and anthocyanins act as important fillers in the endodermis of the seed coat, determining the seed coat color and thickness. Another part of the carbon source is converted to pyruvate by glycolysis to produce acetyl-CoA, which provides the direct substrate malonyl-CoA for the synthesis of FAs and further transformed into stored oil bodies after the synthesis of triacylglycerol. These two processes compete for initial sugar allocation and malonyl-CoA allocation, while the phenylpropane metabolic pathway and FA synthesis pathway, as two important processes determining seed coat development and oil accumulation, are controlled by a strict and complex regulatory mechanism operated by a series of transcription factors

Full size image

Conclusions

In summary, we have provided high temporal-resolution transcriptomes during B. napus seed development. The 26 time-course transcriptomes are clearly clustered into five distinct groups from stage I to stage V. Co-expression network analysis and correlation analysis revealed the carbon source competition between the seed coat and embryo, and these two processes were under fine regulation by a number of transcription factors during seed development. The co-expression genes of the phenylpropanoid and FA pathways, especially the transcription factor-target genes revealed here, provide valuable tools for optimizing carbon partitioning to achieve high yields of seed storage products through biotechnology.

Methods

Plant materials and sampling

The RNA-seq data were generated in our previous study [28]. All transcriptomes could be obtained from the BnIR database (https://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn).

RNA isolation and transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total amount of 1.5 μg RNA per sample was used to generate RNA-seq libraries by the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). To select cDNA fragments of the preferred 200 bp in length, the library fragments were purified by the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, CA, USA). DNA fragments with ligated adaptor molecules on both ends were selectively enriched using Illumina PCR Primer Cocktail in a 15-cycle PCR reaction. Products were then purified (AMPure XP system) and quantified by the Agilent high-sensitivity DNA assay on a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent). Paired-end (PE) sequencing was performed on these libraries using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina) in PE150 mode by Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

Read mapping and expression profiling

The quality of the RNA sequencing reads was examined by FastQC (v0.11.9) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Barcode adaptors and low-quality reads (read quality < 80 for paired-end reads) were removed by Trimmomatic (v0.38) [91]. Then, the filtered reads were aligned to the B. napus reference genome [31] and annotated by three different pipelines which were described below.

For the first pipeline, the filtered reads from each sample were mapped to the reference genome using Hisat2-2.1.0 [92] with default parameters. Bam files containing aligned reads were inputted into StringTie (v1.3.3b) [93] to measure the expression level of genes. For the second pipeline, the STAR (v2.7.5a) [94] software was used to map the reads to the reference genome. The junctions detected in the first pass were collected and used them as “annotated” junctions for the 2nd pass mapping. Reads or fragments were counted from BAM files using the FeatureCounts (v1.6.4) [95]. For the third pipeline, we used the Salmon (v1.3.0) [96] to build the index of the reference genome with default parameters. The TPM measure for each sample was used Salmon with the parameter “validateMapping” for preserving all the genes. The Pearson correlation coefficient between biological replicates was calculated by the R software using gene expression values from the first pipeline.

PCA and hierarchical clustering

To facilitate the graphical interpretation of relatedness among 26 different time points of seed, we reduced the dimensional expression data to two dimensions by PCA using the “prcomp” function in the R software with default settings. Hierarchical clustering was performed by the pvclust package (v2.2.0) with a default setting using Pearson’s correlation distance [97]. The transformed and normalized gene expression values with log2(TPM + 1) were used for the analysis of PCA and hierarchical clustering.

Identification of seed-specific gene expression

To identify genes that are preferentially expressed in seed tissues, RNA-seq data from 91 different tissue samples that include 26 seed samples harvested at different time points and 65 non-seed samples were used to calculate the gene expression level. Genes were categorized according to their expression level patterns and tau scores. Tau is one of the frequently used algorithms for estimating the τ value for screening tissue-specifically expressed genes [98, 99]. Genes expressed ≤ 1.0 TPM in all tissues were excluded from subsequent analysis. Then, expression levels were transformed based on log [2], and the tau score was calculated for each gene using the TBtools [100]. The values of tau vary from 0 to 1, and the genes having τ > 0.9 were classified as tissue-specific expression [98, 99].

Identification of co-expression modules using WGCNA

We filtered genes by mean expression and variance before performing WGCNA. The details are as follows: (i) remove genes having a lower expression and retain the 50,000 most expressed genes and (ii) remove genes which expression is too similar across samples and retain the top 15,000 genes with a high coefficient of variance (https://horvath.genetics.ucla.edu/html/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/WGCNA/faq.html) [101]. The WGCNA R package [102] was used with the filtered genes to define modules and gene connections. A matrix of pairwise Spearman correlation coefficient between all pairs of genes was generated and transformed into an adjacency matrix (a matrix of connection strengths) using the formula: connection strength (adjacency value) =|(1 + correlation)/2|β. Here, β represents the soft threshold for the correlation matrix. A β value of 12 was determined based on the scale-free topology criterion [103]. The resulting adjacency matrix was converted to a topological overlap (TO) matrix via the TOM similarity algorithm, and the genes were hierarchically clustered based on TO similarity. The dynamic tree-cutting algorithm was used to cut the hierarchal clustering dendrogram, and modules were defined after combining branches to reach a stable number of clusters. The Gephi v0.9 (http://gephi.org) software “MultiGravity ForceAtlas 2” layout was used to visualize the gene interactions and the network among the five seed development-related modules.

Functional enrichment analysis of co-expression modules

Functional category enrichment for each co-expression module was evaluated by MapMan (v3.6.0RC1) functional annotation [38]. Before conducting the MapMan annotation, we used the protein sequences from ZS11 as a representative protein and ran the Mercator (http://mapman.gabipd.org/) with default settings. Fisher’s exact test was used to examine whether the functional categories were overrepresented for a given module. The resulting P values were adjusted to Q values by the Benjamini–Hochberg correction and a false discovery rate of 5% was applied.

Acyl-lipid-related co-expression network

The co-expression network of acyl-lipid was built as the previous report [37]. The genes in co-expression modules were assembled in a “candidate-gene set.” A total of 885 Arabidopsis gene protein sequences involved in acyl-lipid metabolism (http://aralip.plantbiology.msu.edu/pathways/pathways) were used to search for their orthologs in B. napus through BLASTP 2.6.0 + program with a cutoff e-value < 10−5. The 3044 B. napus acyl-lipid genes were defined as a “guide-gene set,” which were used to build the co-expression network. The connections between guide genes and candidate genes were built by using the method previously reported [104]. All connections between guide genes and their linked partners (P1) and connections between P1 were computed. The gene was retained only if the absolute value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) between genes was larger than 0.8. All transcription factors and the genes with the top 10% highest connectivity in each module were defined as hub genes [37]. The Cytoscape v3.6 software “yFiles Organic Layout” was used to visualize the acyl-lipid co-expression network when Pearson’s correlation coefficient between genes was larger than 0.9 [105].

Integrate the results from TWAS and co-expression network

We used the “Overlap” and “cageminer” methods to integrate the results from TWAS and co-expression networks. “Overlap” method—(i) the 692 SOC-associated genes were identified by TWAS [39], and their orthologs in ZS11 were identified using the “Gene index” module in BnTIR [28]; (ii) the transcription factors and genes with the top 10% highest connectivity in each module were defined as co-expression hub genes [37]; and (iii) identified genes that were enriched in both co-expression hub genes and TWAS-significant genes. Furthermore, we also use the “cageminer” R package [106] to integrate the results of TWAS and co-expression network: (i) using SOC-associated genes identified by TWAS as putative candidate genes, (ii) using acyl-lipid (Additional file 2: Table S24) and phenylalanine (Additional file 2: Table S25) genes as guide genes; and (iii) The function “mine_step2()” in the “cageminer” R package was used to select candidates in the co-expression modules enriched in guide genes. In total, 59 genes were identified, and 12 genes were detected simultaneously by two methods.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Verification of differential gene expression was performed using RNA samples for sequencing. cDNA was synthesized using the Transcript RT Kit (TransGen Biotech). qPCR was carried out using the TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (TransGen Biotech) on a CFX384 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad). Relative quantification was performed using the comparative cycle threshold method, and the relative amount of PCR product that was amplified using the designed primer sets (Additional file 2: Table S26) was normalized to the reference gene BnACT7.

Seed FA analysis

FAs of developing seeds were analyzed by GC-FID as previously described [107]. Briefly, a known number of seeds from each sample were dried and weighed, after that, FAs were methylated and extracted with methanol containing 5% (v/v) H2SO4 and 0.01% butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT). FAs were quantified using a gas chromatograph and identified according to their retention times, and the peak area was used to quantify FA composition by comparing with the internal standard heptadecanoic acid (17:0). FA composition and total FAs were calculated as µg per seed.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article, its supplementary information files, and publicly available repositories. All RNA-seq data used for the analysis in this study are available in BnIR (http://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/). The RNA-seq data have also been submitted to NCBI under BioProject ID: PRJNA722877 in our previous study [28]. The code used to generate the results has been uploaded to GitHub (https://github.com/liudxgit/rapeseed-develop).

Abbreviations

DAF:

Days after flowering

TAG:

Triacylglycerol

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

FAs:

Fatty acids

PAs:

Procyanidins

MBW:

MYB, bHLH, and WD40 ternary protein complexes

SOC:

Seed oil content

SCC:

Seed coat content

TPM:

Transcripts per million

PCA:

Principal component analysis

WGCNA:

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

TWAS:

Transcriptome-wide association study

TFBS:

Transcription factor binding sites

MFR:

Metabolic flux redirection

References

  1. Dupont J, White PJ, Johnston KM, Heggtveit HA, McDonald BE, Grundy SM, et al. Food safety and health effects of canola oil. J Am Coll Nutr. 1989;8(5):360–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin L, Allemekinders H, Dansby A, Campbell L, Durance-Tod S, Berger A, et al. Evidence of health benefits of canola oil. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(6):370–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen BY, Heneen WK. Inheritance of seed colour in Brassicacampestris L. and breeding for yellow-seeded B.napusL. Euphytica. 1992;59(2–3):157–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang ZL, Li JN, Zhang XK, Chen L, Wang R. Genetic variation of yellow-seeded rapeseed lines (Brassicanapus L.) from different genetic sources. Plant Breed. 2010;116(5):471–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meng J, Shi S, Gan L, Li Z, Qu X. The production of yellow-seeded Brassicanapus (AACC) through crossing interspecific hybrids of B.campestris (AA) and B.carinata (BBCC) with B.napus. Euphytica. 1998;103(3):329–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta M, Bhaskar PB, Sriram S, Wang PH. Integration of omics approaches to understand oil/protein content during seed development in oilseed crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36(5):637–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hajduch M, Matusova R, Houston NL, Thelen JJ. Comparative proteomics of seed maturation in oilseeds reveals differences in intermediary metabolism. Proteomics. 2011;11(9):1619–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Norton G, Harris JF. Compositional changes in developing rape seed (Brassicanapus L.). Planta. 1975;123(2):163–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Benning C. Functions of triacylglycerols during plant development and stress. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;49:191–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maraschin FDS, Kulcheski FR, Segatto ALA, Trenz TS, Barrientos-Diaz O, Margis-Pinheiro M, et al. Enzymes of glycerol-3-phosphate pathway in triacylglycerol synthesis in plants: function, biotechnological application and evolution. Prog Lipid Res. 2019;73:46–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Troncoso-Ponce MA, Nikovics K, Marchive C, Lepiniec L, Baud S. New insights on the organization and regulation of the fatty acid biosynthetic network in the model higher plant Arabidopsisthaliana. Biochimie. 2016;120:3–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Radchuk V, Borisjuk L. Physical, metabolic and developmental functions of the seed coat. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:510.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Akhov L, Ashe P, Tan Y, Datla R, and Selvaraj G. Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in the seed coat of yellow-seeded, canola quality Brassica napus YN01-429 is constrained at the committed step catalyzed by dihydroflavonol 4-reductase. Botany. 2009;87(6):616–25.

  14. Nesi N, Lucas MO, Auger B, Baron C, Lécureuil A, Guerche P, et al. The promoter of the Arabidopsis thaliana BAN gene is active in proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells of the Brassica napus seed coat. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28(4):601–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lepiniec L, Debeaujon I, Routaboul JM, Baudry A, Pourcel L, Nesi N, et al. Genetics and biochemistry of seed flavonoids. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:405–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winkel-Shirley B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(2):485–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Auger B, Marnet N, Gautier V, Maia-Grondard A, Leprince F, Renard M, et al. A detailed survey of seed coat flavonoids in developing seeds of Brassicanapus L. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(10):6246–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Rius SP, Casati P. Flavonoids: biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:222.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Baudry A, Heim MA, Dubreucq B, Caboche M, Weisshaar B, Lepiniec L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsisthaliana. Plant J. 2004;39(3):366–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu W, Dubos C, Lepiniec L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(3):176–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu W, Grain D, Bobet S, Le Gourrierec J, Thévenin J, Kelemen Z, et al. Complexity and robustness of the flavonoid transcriptional regulatory network revealed by comprehensive analyses of MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes and their targets in Arabidopsis seed. New Phytol. 2014;202(1):132–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzalez A, Zhao M, Leavitt JM, Lloyd AM. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008;53(5):814–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong M, Hu K, Tian T, Li X, Chen L, Zhang Y, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of seed coats in yellow-seeded Brassicanapus reveals novel genes that influence proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1674.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhai Y, Yu K, Cai S, Hu L, Amoo O, Xu L, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of BnTT8 homologs controls yellow seed coat development for effective oil production in Brassicanapus L. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(5):1153–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li X, Chen L, Hong M, Zhang Y, Zu F, Wen J, et al. A large insertion in bHLH transcription factor BrTT8 resulting in yellow seed coat in Brassica rapa. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e44145.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li A, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Snowdon RJ, Liang G, Wang Y. Molecular and cytological characterization of introgression lines in yellow seed derived from somatic hybrids between Brassicanapus and Sinapisalba. Mol Breed. 2012;29(1):209–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lian J, Lu X, Yin N, Ma L, Lu J, Liu X, et al. Silencing of BnTT1 family genes affects seed flavonoid biosynthesis and alters seed fatty acid composition in Brassicanapus. Plant Sci. 2017;254:32–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu D, Yu L, Wei L, Yu P, Wang J, Zhao H, et al. BnTIR: an online transcriptome platform for exploring RNA-seq libraries for oil crop Brassicanapus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(10):1895–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu D, Yu L, Wei L. Brassica napus raw sequence reads. GenBank; 2021 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA722877.

  30. Zhang L, Liang J, Chen H, Zhang Z, Wu J, Wang X. A near-complete genome assembly of Brassicarapa provides new insights into the evolution of centromeres. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023;21(5):1022–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Song JM, Guan Z, Hu J, Guo C, Yang Z, Wang S, et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassicanapus. Nat Plants. 2020;6(1):34–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Song JM, Guan Z. Brassica napus genome sequencing and assembly. GenBank; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA546246.

  33. Wu XL, Liu ZH, Hu ZH, Huang RZ. BnWRI1 coordinates fatty acid biosynthesis and photosynthesis pathways during oil accumulation in rapeseed. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56(6):582–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stone SL, Kwong LW, Yee KM, Pelletier J, Lepiniec L, Fischer RL, et al. LEAFYCOTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(20):11806–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamamoto A, Yoshii M, Murase S, Fujita M, Kurata N, Hobo T, et al. Cell-by-cell developmental transition from embryo to post-germination phase revealed by heterochronic gene expression and ER-body formation in Arabidopsis leafy cotyledon mutants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(12):2112–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Chen M, Chen T, Xuan L, Li Z, Du X, et al. TRANSPARENTTESTA2 regulates embryonic fatty acid biosynthesis by targeting FUSCA3 during the early developmental stage of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 2014;77(5):757–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cui Y, Zeng X, Xiong Q, Wei D, Liao J, Xu Y, et al. Combining quantitative trait locus and co-expression analysis allowed identification of new candidates for oil accumulation in rapeseed. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(5):1649–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, et al. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 2004;37(6):914–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tang S, Zhao H, Lu S, Yu L, Zhang G, Zhang Y, et al. Genome- and transcriptome-wide association studies provide insights into the genetic basis of natural variation of seed oil content in Brassicanapus. Mol Plant. 2021;14(3):470–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tang S, Zhao H. Genome-wide re-sequencing data of Brassica napus. National Genomics Data Center; 2021 Available from: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/browse/PRJCA002835.

  41. Tang S, Zhao H. Transcriptome-wide data of seed in Brassica napus. National Genomics Data Center; 2021 Available from: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/browse/PRJCA002836.

  42. Shirley BW, Kubasek WL, Storz G, Bruggemann E, Koornneef M, Ausubel FM, et al. Analysis of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant J. 1995;8(5):659–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Qu C, Fu F, Lu K, Zhang K, Wang R, Xu X, et al. Differential accumulation of phenolic compounds and expression of related genes in black- and yellow-seeded Brassicanapus. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(10):2885–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang J, Jian H, Wei L, Qu C, Xu X, Lu K, et al. Genome-wide analysis of seed acid detergent lignin (ADL) and hull content in rapeseed (Brassicanapus L.). PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0145045.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang F, He J, Shi J, Zheng T, Xu F, Wu G, et al. Embryonal control of yellow seed coat locus ECY1 is related to alanine and phenylalanine metabolism in the seed embryo of Brassicanapus. G3 Genesgenetics. 2016;6(4):1073–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Qu C, Zhao H, Fu F, Wang Z, Zhang K, Zhou Y, et al. Genome-wide survey of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and gene expression analysis between black- and yellow-seeded Brassicanapus. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1755.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhao H, Xia Y, Zheng X, Fan R, et al. Multi-omics analysis dissects the genetic architecture of seed coat content in Brassicanapus. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hatzivassiliou G, Zhao F, Bauer DE, Andreadis C, Shaw AN, Dhanak D, et al. ATP citrate lyase inhibition can suppress tumor cell growth. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(4):311–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Calderwood A, Lloyd A, Hepworth J, Tudor EH, Jones DM, Woodhouse S, et al. Total FLC transcript dynamics from divergent paralogue expression explains flowering diversity in Brassicanapus. New Phytol. 2021;229(6):3534–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Giraudat J, Hauge BM, Valon C, Smalle J, Parcy F, Goodman HM. Isolation of the Arabidopsis ABI3 gene by positional cloning. Plant Cell. 1992;4(10):1251–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang F, Perry SE. Identification of direct targets of FUSCA3, a key regulator of Arabidopsis seed development. Plant Physiol. 2013;161(3):1251–64.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Pelletier JM, Kwong RW, Park S, Le BH, Baden R, Cagliari A, et al. LEC1 sequentially regulates the transcription of genes involved in diverse developmental processes during seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(32):E6710–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Schneider A, Aghamirzaie D, Elmarakeby H, Poudel AN, Koo AJ, Heath LS, et al. Potential targets of VIVIPAROUS1/ABI3-LIKE1 (VAL1) repression in developing Arabidopsisthaliana embryos. Plant J. 2016;85(2):305–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang HW, Zhang B, Hao YJ, Huang J, Tian AG, Liao Y, et al. The soybean Dof-type transcription factor genes, GmDof4 and GmDof11, enhance lipid content in the seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 2007;52(4):716–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lepiniec L, Devic M, Roscoe TJ, Bouyer D, Zhou DX, Boulard C, et al. Molecular and epigenetic regulations and functions of the LAFL transcriptional regulators that control seed development. Plant Reprod. 2018;31(3):291–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shen Y, Devic M, Lepiniec L, Zhou DX. Chromodomain, helicase and DNA-binding CHD1 protein, CHR5, are involved in establishing active chromatin state of seed maturation genes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13(6):811–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Troncoso-Ponce MA, Barthole G, Tremblais G, To A, Miquel M, Lepiniec L, et al. Transcriptional activation of two delta-9 palmitoyl-ACP desaturase genes by MYB115 and MYB118 is critical for biosynthesis of omega-7 monounsaturated fatty acids in the endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell. 2016;28(10):2666–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Barthole G, To A, Marchive C, Brunaud V, Soubigou-Taconnat L, Berger N, et al. MYB118 represses endosperm maturation in seeds of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(9):3519–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Song SK, Jang HU, Kim YH, Lee BH, Lee MM. Overexpression of three related root-cap outermost-cell-specific C2H2-type zinc-finger protein genes suppresses the growth of Arabidopsis in an EAR-motif-dependent manner. BMB Rep. 2020;53(3):160–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun Z, Liu R, Guo B, Huang K, Wang L, Han Y, et al. Ectopic expression of GmZAT4, a putative C2H2-type zinc finger protein, enhances PEG and NaCl stress tolerances in Arabidopsisthaliana. 3 Biotech. 2019;9(5):166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Manna M, Thakur T, Chirom O, Mandlik R, Deshmukh R, Salvi P. Transcription factors as key molecular target to strengthen the drought stress tolerance in plants. Physiol Plant. 2021;172(2):847–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Corrales AR, Carrillo L, Lasierra P, Nebauer SG, Dominguez-Figueroa J, Renau-Morata B, et al. Multifaceted role of cycling DOF factor 3 (CDF3) in the regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(5):748–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zou HF, Zhang YQ, Wei W, Chen HW, Song QX, Liu YF, et al. The transcription factor AtDOF4.2 regulates shoot branching and seed coat formation in Arabidopsis. Biochem J. 2013;449(2):373–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Li‐Beisson Y, Shorrosh BS, Beisson F, Andersson MX, Arondel V, Bates PD, et al. Acyl-Lipid Metabolism. The Arabidopsis Book. 2010.

  65. Moissiard G, Cokus SJ, Cary J, Feng S, Billi AC, Stroud H, et al. MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science. 2012;336(6087):1448–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Harris CJ, Husmann D, Liu W, Kasmi FE, Wang H, Papikian A, et al. Arabidopsis AtMORC4 and AtMORC7 form nuclear bodies and repress a large number of protein-coding genes. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(5):e1005998.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, et al. Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassicanapus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010;463(7278):178–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Singh R, Ong-Abdullah M, Low ET, Manaf MA, Rosli R, Nookiah R, et al. Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of interfertile species in old and new worlds. Nature. 2013;500(7462):335–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Baud S, Dubreucq B, Miquel M, Rochat C, Lepiniec L. Storage reserve accumulation in Arabidopsis: metabolic and developmental control of seed filling. Arabidopsis Book. 2008;6:e0113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chandler JW, Werr W. A phylogenetically conserved APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR, ERF12, regulates Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Mol Biol. 2020;102(1–2):39–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhao Y, Medrano L, Ohashi K, Fletcher JC, Yu H, Sakai H, et al. HANABA TARANU is a GATA transcription factor that regulates shoot apical meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16(10):2586–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang X, Zhou Y, Ding L, Wu Z, Liu R, Meyerowitz EM. Transcription repressor HANABA TARANU controls flower development by integrating the actions of multiple hormones, floral organ specification genes, and GATA3 family genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(1):83–101.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chia TY, Pike MJ, Rawsthorne S. Storage oil breakdown during embryo development of Brassicanapus (L.). J Exp Bot. 2005;56(415):1285–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Cooper TG, Beevers H. β Oxidation in glyoxysomes from castor bean endosperm. J Biol Chem. 1969;244(13):3514–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. BEEVERS. Metabolic production of sucrose from fat. Nature. 1961;191(4787):433.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Baud S, Boutin JP, Miquel M, Lepiniec LC, Rochat C. An integrated overview of seed development in Arabidopsisthaliana ecotype WS. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2002;40(2):151–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Cuming AC. LEA proteins. In: Shewry PR, Casey R, editors. Seed proteins. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 1999. p. 753–80.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Eastmond PJ, Graham IA. Re-examining the role of the glyoxylate cycle in oilseeds. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6(2):72–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu J, Hao W, Liu J, Fan S, Zhao W, Deng L, et al. A novel chimeric mitochondrial gene confers cytoplasmic effects on seed oil content in polyploid rapeseed (Brassicanapus). Mol Plant. 2019;12(4):582–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Figueiredo DD, Köhler C. Signalling events regulating seed coat development. Biochem Soc Trans. 2014;42(2):358–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Dong NQ, Lin HX. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant-environment interactions. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63(1):180–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gray J, Caparrós-Ruiz D, Grotewold E. Grass phenylpropanoids: regulate before using! Plant Sci. 2012;184:112–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lanot A, Hodge D, Lim EK, Vaistij FE, Bowles DJ. Redirection of flux through the phenylpropanoid pathway by increased glucosylation of soluble intermediates. Planta. 2008;228(4):609–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hu Y, Cheng H, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Niu S, Wang X, et al. The MdMYB16/MdMYB1-miR7125-MdCCR module regulates the homeostasis between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis during light induction in apple. New Phytol. 2021;231(3):1105–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Debeaujon I, Nesi N, Perez P, Devic M, Grandjean O, Caboche M, et al. Proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells in Arabidopsis testa: regulation of differentiation and role in seed development. Plant Cell. 2003;15(11):2514–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Appelhagen I, Lu GH, Huep G, Schmelzer E, Weisshaar B, Sagasser M. TRANSPARENT TESTA1 interacts with R2R3-MYB factors and affects early and late steps of flavonoid biosynthesis in the endothelium of Arabidopsisthaliana seeds. Plant J. 2011;67(3):406–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Debeaujon I, Peeters AJ, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. The TRANSPARENTTESTA12 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a multidrug secondary transporter-like protein required for flavonoid sequestration in vacuoles of the seed coat endothelium. Plant Cell. 2001;13(4):853–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Appelhagen I, Thiedig K, Nordholt N, Schmidt N, Huep G, Sagasser M, et al. Update on transparent testa mutants from Arabidopsisthaliana: characterisation of new alleles from an isogenic collection. Planta. 2014;240(5):955–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Dimov Z, Suprianto E, Hermann F, Möllers C. Genetic variation for seed hull and fibre content in a collection of European winter oilseed rape material (Brassicanapus L.) and development of NIRS calibrations. Plant Breed. 2012;131(3):361–8.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT. StringTie and Ballgown Nat Protoc. 2016;11(9):1650–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):417–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Suzuki R, Shimodaira H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(12):1540–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Kryuchkova-Mostacci N, Robinson-Rechavi M. A benchmark of gene expression tissue-specificity metrics. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(2):205–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Zhang B, Fei Y, Feng J, Zhu X, Wang R, Xiao H, et al. RiceNCexp: a rice non-coding RNA co-expression atlas based on massive RNA-seq and small-RNA seq data. J Exp Bot. 2022;73(18):6068–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Lemoine GG, Scott-Boyer M-P, Ambroise B, Périn O, Droit A. GWENA: gene co-expression networks analysis and extended modules characterization in a single Bioconductor package. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22(1):267.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhang B, Horvath S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:Article17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Guerin C, Joet T, Serret J, Lashermes P, Vaissayre V, Agbessi MD, et al. Gene coexpression network analysis of oil biosynthesis in an interspecific backcross of oil palm. Plant J. 2016;87(5):423–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Almeida-Silva F, Venancio TM. cageminer: an R/Bioconductor package to prioritize candidate genes by integrating genome-wide association studies and gene coexpression networks. In Silico Plants. 2022;4(2):diac018.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lu S, Bahn SC, Qu G, Qin H, Hong Y, Xu Q, et al. Increased expression of phospholipase Dalpha1 in guard cells decreases water loss with improved seed production under drought in Brassicanapus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11(3):380–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the bioinformatics computing platform of the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement at Huazhong Agricultural University managed by Hao Liu. We sincerely thank the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and the Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University; Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, and Yazhouwan National Laboratory. We also thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for providing valuable comments.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070559), National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2021YFF1000100), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory (2021HSZD0004), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662022ZKPY001).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Liangqian Yu and Dongxu Liu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Liangqian Yu, Dongxu Liu, Feifan Yin, Pugang Yu, Shaoping Lu, Yuting Zhang, Hu Zhao, Xuan Yao, Cheng Dai, Qing-Yong Yang & Liang Guo

  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Dongxu Liu

  3. Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, 572025, China

    Yuting Zhang, Xuan Yao, Qing-Yong Yang & Liang Guo

  4. Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, 59717, USA

    Chaofu Lu

Authors
  1. Liangqian Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dongxu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feifan Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pugang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shaoping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chaofu Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xuan Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Cheng Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Qing-Yong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Liang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.G., Q.Q.Y., and C.D. designed this study. L.Y., P.Y., and S.L. performed the experiments. D.L., L.Y., F.Y., Y.Z., and H.Z. performed the bioinformatics analysis. L.Y. and D.L. wrote the manuscript. L.G., Q.Q.Y., C.D., C.L., X.Y., and S.L. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cheng Dai, Qing-Yong Yang or Liang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

RNA-seq data analysis process and the core module of database. Fig. S2. Correlation between biological replications, four materials were randomly selected from the seed (Average R=0.97). Fig. S3. The correlation and PCA analysis across the transcriptomes of the 26 time points of seeds. Fig. S4. Expression patterns of seed-specific genes in all seed and non-seed samples. Fig. S5. Expression profile of marker genes in different stages. Fig. S6. WGCNA co-expression networks. Fig. S7. Enrichment analysis for genes in five core modules. Fig. S8. The co-expression network of TT5 (a), BAN (b), TT19 (c). Fig. S9. Correlation between SOC and expression of TT5, BAN and TT19. Fig. S10. Variation in the protein sequence of different haplotypes of BnaC08.TT5 (a) and BnaA08.ACLA-3 (b). Fig. S11. Correlations between the paralogues of LEC2 and LEC1. Fig. S12. Correlation between SOC and expression of LEC2, LEC1 and WRI1. Fig. S13. qPCR validation of FAs biosynthesis related genes. Fig. S14. Haplotypes for the gene ZAT4 (BnaA04G0285000ZS). Fig. S15. Variation in the protein sequence of different haplotypes of BnaA03.DOF4.4. Fig. S16. Haplotypes for the gene DOF4.7 (BnaC01G0012600ZS). Fig. S17. Variation in the protein sequence of different haplotypes of BnaC07.MORC7 (a) and BnaC01.PGI1 (b). Fig. S18. Expression profile of candidate genes.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Summary of RNA sequencing. Table S2. Correlation between biological replicates and different time points. Table S3. Summary of seed-specific genes. Table S4. Summary of marker genes in each core module. Table S5. Summary of genes in each co-expression network module. Table S6. Summary of acyl-lipid genes in each core module. Table S7. Summary of phenylalanine genes in each core module. Table S8. Summary of MapMan enrichment results of floralwhite (stage I) module. Table S9. Summary of MapMan enrichment results of brown2 (stage II) module. Table S10. Summary of MapMan enrichment results of palevioletred2 (stage III) module. Table S11. Summary of MapMan enrichment results of darkorange2 (stage IV) module. Table S12. Summary of MapMan enrichment results of midnightblue (stage V) module. Table S13. Summary of hub genes in each co-expression network module. Table S14. Summary of genes integrated from co-expression network and TWAS-significant genes. Table S15. Summary of acyl-lipid genes in TT5, BAN and TT19 co-expression network. Table S16. Summary of acyl-lipid genes in TT5, BAN, TT19 and TT1 co-expression network. Table S17. Summary of candidate genes that expression significant correlation with seed oil content and seed coat content in co-expression network of FAs biosynthesis genes. Table S18. Summary of candidate genes that expression significant correlation with oil content and seed coat content in co-expression network of acyl-related genes. Table S19. Seed-specific transcription factors overlapped with TWAS-significant genes or co-expression network hub genes. Table S20. Seed-specific transcription factors that significantly correlated with SOC. Table S21. Summary of genes in EIL5, ERF12 and GATA19 co-expression network. Table S22. Summary of acyl-lipid genes in EIL5, ERF12 and GATA19 co-expression network. Table S23. The binding site information in the promoter of genes that are coregulated by EIL5, ERF12 and GATA19. Table S24. Summary of acyl-lipid genes in ZS11. Table S25. Summary of phenylalanine genes in ZS11. Table S26. Primers used for qRT-PCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, L., Liu, D., Yin, F. et al. Interaction between phenylpropane metabolism and oil accumulation in the developing seed of Brassica napus revealed by high temporal-resolution transcriptomes. BMC Biol 21, 202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01705-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01705-z

Keywords

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us