- Opinion
- Open access
- Published:
Membranes are functionalized by a proteolipid code
BMC Biology volume 22, Article number: 46 (2024)
Abstract
Membranes are protein and lipid structures that surround cells and other biological compartments. We present a conceptual model wherein all membranes are organized into structural and functional zones. The assembly of zones such as receptor clusters, protein-coated pits, lamellipodia, cell junctions, and membrane fusion sites is explained to occur through a protein-lipid code. This challenges the theory that lipids sort proteins after forming stable membrane subregions independently of proteins.
Membrane zonation
Membranes are organized fluid structures that incorporate many different proteins and lipids. Their basic architecture consists of a lipid bilayer with embedded integral proteins and peripheral proteins that associate with a single leaflet. While more than 50 years have passed since this architecture was revealed [1], there is no consensus on how proteins and lipids interact to create distinct functional regions within the same continuous fluid. To resolve this quandary, it is useful to refer to any of the unique membrane regions with a single term so that explanations can be generalized, although “membrane raft” refers only to regions enriched in sterols and sphingolipids [2], while “domain” ambiguates with protein domains. Here, we formulate an explicit framework for membrane structure centred around the concept of a “zone” [3,4,5], which we define as a region of membrane enclosing a contiguous group of particles capable of working together to perform a biological function.
In our endeavour to comprehensively describe membrane structure, we explain what zones are and how they are created and regulated. Examples of zones include clathrin-coated pits, microvilli, lamellipodia, cholesterol- and sphingolipid-enriched regions [2, 6], neuronal synaptic termini, cell junctions, membrane contact sites, tetraspanin-enriched “microdomains”, bacterial “microdomains” [7], receptor clusters, viral budding sites [8], and integral proteins stabilized by lipid “fingerprints” [9,10,11]. These functional units are created by a protein-lipid language that harmonizes with the genetic code to direct the flow of information in cells; hence, we call our model the proteolipid code.
Hierarchy of zone attributes
We will first explain how zones can be conceptualized with analogy to the structure hierarchy that describes proteins (Fig. 1). A hierarchy for membrane structure has already been proposed [12, 13]; however, it is more convenient when defined in relation to zones. The primary structure of a zone is its lipid and protein composition, which can be determined with methods such as mass spectrometry. Secondary structure is the spatial arrangement of zone components, including bilayer asymmetry and non-random lateral distributions. This can be probed by extracting physiological membranes and visualizing them with a structural technique such as cryogenic election microscopy (Fig. 2a) [14]. Tertiary features are supramolecular properties such as curvature, thickness, fluidity, density, electrostatic charge, and gradient or wave characteristics and can be observed in molecular simulations [12]. Finally, quaternary relationships are interactions between zones such as the exchange of molecules and the intake or loss of membrane sections. These can be seen with techniques such as single particle tracking or by imaging formations like budding vesicles, elongating tubules, membrane contact sites between organelles, or hemi-fusion intermediates.
All four zone attribute ranks have functional significance. For instance, secondary structure is vital for integral proteins such as receptors and ion channels, which require bound lipids for stability and sometimes regulation [9, 21]. Furthermore, colocalized molecules belonging to secondary structure can be coincidentally detected by proteins that are recruited from the cytosol [22, 23]. Tertiary features such as curvature create the morphology of organelles and can be sensed by crescent-shaped BAR domains [24]. Stiffness is also an important tertiary characteristic that plays a role in vesicle genesis and viral fusion [25, 26]. Quaternary associations are the materialization of direct communication between membranous organelles, cells, and viruses. Secondary, tertiary, and quaternary attributes each originate from primary structure, which is organized by integral and peripheral proteins.
Zoning by integral proteins
We begin our discussion on zoning by summarizing the role of integral proteins, which account for about half the mass of physiological membranes [27, 28] and approximately 26% of the human proteome [29]. Integral proteins possess unique lipid “fingerprints” by virtue of their preferential interactions [10]. They may also have strong close-range interactions with each other, directly or through their fingerprints [30], which can cause them to cluster into “islands” [21, 31, 32], particularly when lipids are scarce, when hydrophobic domains have matching lengths, or when there is mismatch between hydrophobic domains and lipid aliphatic chains [33]. When integral proteins cluster, they leave surplus lipids not occupying their remaining fingerprint sites to pool into adjacent “void” zones [4, 31]. Consequently, integral proteins form lipid fingerprints, islands, and lipid-only voids.
This theory of zoning, which also extends to membrane-anchored peripheral proteins, explains observations that protein-independent lipid clustering does not. The proportion of Ras proteins found in cholesterol-rich zones is independent of protein expression level [34, 35], suggesting that proteins recruit lipids that then locally adopt ordered states [36]. Several distinct zones that are each enriched in a particular type of protein may coexist, such as those containing receptors and adaptors in T cells [37]. This indicates that compatible proteins induce their own zones rather than being recruited to preexisting ones [21, 36]. Protein clustering is the simplest explanation for protein-rich and lipid-only zones as well as the observation that not all of the former qualify as “rafts” [31]. Overall, the idea of integral protein recruitment to self-assembling lipid subregions should be rejected in favour of our proposal of zoning through the proteolipid code.
Zone recognition by peripheral proteins
Before describing how peripheral proteins create or remodel zones, it is useful to explain one way that they are recruited to zones in the first place. Many eukaryotic proteins bind phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs) [23], which, like other lipids, are enriched or depleted in specific zones in each organelle membrane (Fig. 2b, c). For example, the early endosome (EE), trans-Golgi network (TGN), and plasma membranes each respectively have PI3P, PI4P, and PI(4,5)P2 as signature lipids. We propose that proximal sets of lipids, especially including PIPs, act as “lipid codons” or “lipidons” that represent zone-specific identities recognized by peripheral domains [22, 23]. Recognition of lipidons, sometimes with coinciding signals such as protein motifs, pH, or metal ions, explains how proteins with weak affinity for solitary molecules attach to membranes with sufficient strength [22]. Crystal structures [38,39,40,41,42] and molecular simulations [43,44,45] show in detail how multiple PIPs and other lipids reside in adjacent pockets in representative peripheral domains.
Zoning by peripheral proteins
As peripheral proteins bind lipidons, they will simultaneously manipulate the zone that they attach to [46, 47]. This is exemplified by the binding of immature human immunodeficiency virus Gag to the plasma membrane inner leaflet. The Gag polyprotein targets the plasma membrane by recognizing lipids via its matrix domain [48, 49], inducing large-scale sequestration of PI(4,5)P2 as well as cholesterol while multimerizing to create a zone that cooperatively recruits more Gag monomers [8]. This flexes the plasma membrane until the nascent virion buds, where the enrichment of PI(4,5)P2 and cholesterol in the viral membrane signifies its origin from an induced zone [50]. The recognition of lipidons on protein islands can also create tubules and protein-coated pits [51,52,53]. To generalize, any force exerted on the membrane can induce, remodel, or maintain a zone [47], including intercellular, cell wall, and cytoskeleton interactions.
The cytoskeleton
The actin-based cytoskeleton fixes to protein islands and is important for their stability [31]. It also induces zones such as lamellipodia, filopodia, podosomes, and invadosomes by recognizing lipidons with actin adaptors [54, 55]. Kusumi et al. propound that the cytoskeleton immobilizes rows of integral proteins that maintain 40–300-nm compartments on the plasma membrane through steric hindrance and hydrodynamic friction within the bilayer [13]. These compartments supposedly contain all other zones such as “rafts”. We disagree with this characterization and believe that these “rafts” and their delimiting “compartments” are one and the same; that is, they are protein islands attached to the cytoskeleton.
Regulation of zoning
Our theories imply that zoning is affected by membrane protein expression, degradation, and activity including enzymatic reactions that produce, convert, and degrade lipids. Enzymatic reactions may also create momentary void zones that are depleted in reactant or enriched in product, which can manifest as a molecular wave [56]. For peripheral proteins, post-translational modifications on lipidon attachment surfaces are positioned to impede or enhance zone recognition. For instance, phosphorylation and lysine modifications appear to reduce net positive charges and disrupt hydrogen bonds to segregate proteins from acidic lipids [57,58,59]. Conversely, covalent modification with lipids such as fatty acids, isoprenoids, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol can act as covalently attached lipidon components [21]. For example, farnesyl and geranylgeranyl groups may match zones with smaller and larger hydrophobic thicknesses, respectively. This would explain the diversity of lipid types that are attached to proteins.
Conclusions
It has been remarked that a single, comprehensive model of the membrane is no longer attainable [60]. This sentiment reflects an incohesive research programme where many hypotheses are available and inaccurate ones are not abandoned [13, 61, 62]. Among those that should be abandoned, the theory that proteins sort to lipid subregions that form independently of proteins [6, 63] is foremost. That said, we do not mean to devalue lipid-lipid interactions, which maintain the membrane bilayer and influence zone attributes. Additionally, zone attributes can be used to condense the many hypotheses regarding the membrane localization of peripheral proteins. We arrive at a model that incorporates the following principles:
-
Membranes are divided into zones which are their structural and functional building blocks and which are characterized by their primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary attributes.
-
Zoning has synchronous protein and lipid dependency; therefore, the instructions for membrane function are specified in a proteolipid code.
-
Integral proteins give rise to three zone types: integral proteins together with lipid fingerprints, protein islands, and lipid-only voids.
-
Peripheral proteins and other membrane-binding objects modify zones by recognizing primary, secondary, and tertiary zone attributes.
-
Zoning is regulated by changes in protein and lipid concentration or state, such as by enzymatic reactions.
-
The proteolipid code is interdependent with the genetic code, and together, they direct the flow of molecular information in cells.
Further to our final point, the proteolipid code completes the cycle of information that allows cells to function (Fig. 2d). This “biological code” can be understood to begin with DNA, which contains the information needed to make RNA and the amino acid sequences of proteins. Proteins create and interact with other biomolecules to conduct most of the business of life, including synthesizing and engaging lipids to create membranes. Membranes are the apotheosis of the biological code as they enclose the entire cell and play a role in nearly all processes, including modulating transcription [64] and organizing ribosomal arrays [65]. The flow of information ends with the degradation of molecules, for instance, at proteasomes which cluster at the endoplasmic reticulum [66]. This cycle equips us to fathom the continuity of life.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- BMP:
-
Bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate
- CL:
-
Cardiolipin
- CER:
-
Ceramide
- C1P:
-
Ceramide-1-phosphate
- Chol:
-
Cholesterol
- CCV:
-
Clathrin-coated vesicle
- DG:
-
Diacylglycerol
- EE:
-
Early endosome
- GSL:
-
Glycosphingolipid
- ILV:
-
Intralumenal vesicle
- IUPAC:
-
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
- LE:
-
Late endosome
- LPA:
-
Lysophosphatidic acid
- NCV:
-
Non-coated vesicle
- PA:
-
Phosphatidic acid
- PC:
-
Phosphatidylcholine
- PE:
-
Phosphatidylethanolamine
- PI:
-
Phosphatidylinositol
- PIP:
-
Phosphatidylinositol phosphate
- PI3P:
-
Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate
- PI4P:
-
Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate
- PI5P:
-
Phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate
- PIP2 :
-
Phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate
- PI(4,5)P2 :
-
Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
- PIP3 :
-
Phosphatidylinositol trisphosphate
- PG:
-
Phosphatidylglycerol
- PS:
-
Phosphatidylserine
- PDB:
-
Protein Data Bank
- SM:
-
Sphingomyelin
- ST:
-
Sterol
- TGN:
-
Trans-Golgi network
References
Singer SJ, Nicolson GL. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972;175:720–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4023.720.
Pike LJ. Rafts defined: a report on the Keystone Symposium on Lipid Rafts and Cell Function. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:1597–8. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.E600002-JLR200.
Simson R, Sheets ED, Jacobson K. Detection of temporary lateral confinement of membrane proteins using single-particle tracking analysis. Biophys J. 1995;69:989–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79972-6.
Mioka, T. et al. Characterization of micron-scale protein-depleted plasma membrane domains in phosphatidylserine-deficient yeast cells. J Cell Sci 135 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.256529.
Emperador-Melero J, Kaeser PS. Assembly of the presynaptic active zone. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020;63:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.03.008.
Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/42408.
López D, Kolter R. Functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1893–902. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1945010.
Yandrapalli N, et al. Self assembly of HIV-1 Gag protein on lipid membranes generates PI(4,5)P2/Cholesterol nanoclusters. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39332. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39332.
Kimchi O, Veatch SL, Machta BB. Ion channels can be allosterically regulated by membrane domains near a de-mixing critical point. J Gen Physiol. 2018;150:1769–77. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201711900.
Corradi V, et al. Lipid-protein interactions are unique fingerprints for membrane proteins. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4:709–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00143.
Levental I, Lyman E. Regulation of membrane protein structure and function by their lipid nano-environment. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24:107–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00524-4.
Blanco-Gonzalez A, Pineiro A, Garcia-Fandino R. Unravelling hierarchical levels of structure in lipid membranes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:2798–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.042.
Kusumi A, Suzuki KG, Kasai RS, Ritchie K, Fujiwara TK. Hierarchical mesoscale domain organization of the plasma membrane. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36:604–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.001.
Tao X, Zhao C, MacKinnon R. Membrane protein isolation and structure determination in cell-derived membrane vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120:e2302325120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302325120.
Tao, X. & MacKinnon, R. Molecular structures of the human Slo1 K+ channel in complex with β4. Elife 8 (2019) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51409.
Tang QY, Zhang Z, Meng XY, Cui M, Logothetis DE. Structural determinants of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) regulation of BK channel activity through the RCK1 Ca2+ coordination site. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:18860–72. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.538033.
Tian Y, et al. Two distinct effects of PIP2 underlie auxiliary subunit-dependent modulation of Slo1 BK channels. J Gen Physiol. 2015;145:331–43. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201511363.
Vaithianathan T, et al. Direct regulation of BK channels by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate as a novel signaling pathway. J Gen Physiol. 2008;132:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200709913.
van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:112–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2330.
Posor Y, Jang W, Haucke V. Phosphoinositides as membrane organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23:797–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00490-x.
Shelby SA, Castello-Serrano I, Wisser KC, Levental I, Veatch SL. Membrane phase separation drives responsive assembly of receptor signaling domains. Nat Chem Biol. 2023;19:750–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01268-8.
Carlton JG, Cullen PJ. Coincidence detection in phosphoinositide signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:540–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.08.005.
Overduin M, Kervin TA. The phosphoinositide code is read by a plethora of protein domains. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2021;18:483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2021.1962302.
Peter BJ, et al. BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science. 2004;303:495–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1092586.
Tristram-Nagle S, Nagle JF. HIV-1 fusion peptide decreases bending energy and promotes curved fusion intermediates. Biophys J. 2007;93:2048–55. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.109181.
Settles EI, Loftus AF, McKeown AN, Parthasarathy R. The vesicle trafficking protein Sar1 lowers lipid membrane rigidity. Biophys J. 2010;99:1539–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.059.
Lindén M, Sens P, Phillips R. Entropic tension in crowded membranes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002431.
Dupuy AD, Engelman DM. Protein area occupancy at the center of the red blood cell membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:2848–52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712379105.
Fagerberg L, Jonasson K, von Heijne G, Uhlén M, Berglund L. Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics. 2010;10:1141–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900258.
Webby M N. et al. Lipids mediate supramolecular outer membrane protein assembly in bacteria. Sci Adv 8 eadc9566 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adc9566.
Lillemeier BF, Pfeiffer JR, Surviladze Z, Wilson BS, Davis MM. Plasma membrane-associated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18992–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609009103.
Chavent M, et al. How nanoscale protein interactions determine the mesoscale dynamic organisation of bacterial outer membrane proteins. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05255-9.
Jiang Y, et al. Membrane-mediated protein interactions drive membrane protein organization. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35202-8.
Plowman SJ, Muncke C, Parton RG, Hancock JF. H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15500–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504114102.
Tian T, et al. Plasma membrane nanoswitches generate high-fidelity Ras signal transduction. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:905–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1615.
Edidin M. The state of lipid rafts: from model membranes to cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003;32:257–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142439.
Lillemeier BF, et al. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1832.
Krick R, et al. Structural and functional characterization of the two phosphoinositide binding sites of PROPPINs, a β-propeller protein family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E2042-2049. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205128109.
Baskaran S, Ragusa MJ, Boura E, Hurley JH. Two-site recognition of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate by PROPPINs in autophagy. Mol Cell. 2012;47:339–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.027.
Liang R, Ren J, Zhang Y, Feng W. Structural conservation of the two phosphoinositide-binding sites in WIPI proteins. J Mol Biol. 2019;431:1494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.02.019.
Jian X, et al. Molecular basis for cooperative binding of anionic phospholipids to the PH domain of the Arf GAP ASAP1. Structure. 2015;23:1977–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.08.008.
Karathanassis D, et al. Binding of the PX domain of p47(phox) to phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidic acid is masked by an intramolecular interaction. EMBO J. 2002;21:5057–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf519.
Yamamoto E. et al. Multiple lipid binding sites determine the affinity of PH domains for phosphoinositide-containing membranes. Sci Adv 2020; 6:eaay5736. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay5736.
Larsen AH, Tata L, John LH, Sansom MSP. Membrane-binding mechanism of the EEA1 FYVE domain revealed by multi-scale molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17:e1008807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008807.
Larsen AH, Sansom MSP. Binding of Ca2+-independent C2 domains to lipid membranes: a multi-scale molecular dynamics study. Structure. 2021;29:1200-1213.e1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2021.05.011.
Morozova D, Guigas G, Weiss M. Dynamic structure formation of peripheral membrane proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002067.
Veatch SL, Rogers N, Decker A, Shelby SA. The plasma membrane as an adaptable fluid mosaic. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2023;1865:184114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.184114.
Ono A, Ablan SD, Lockett SJ, Nagashima K, Freed EO. Phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate regulates HIV-1 Gag targeting to the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14889–94. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405596101.
Saad JS, et al. Structural basis for targeting HIV-1 Gag proteins to the plasma membrane for virus assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11364–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602818103.
Aloia RC, Tian H, Jensen FC. Lipid composition and fluidity of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope and host cell plasma membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:5181–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.11.5181.
Kovtun O, Tillu VA, Ariotti N, Parton RG, Collins BM. Cavin family proteins and the assembly of caveolae. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:1269–78. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.167866.
Wang YJ, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4 phosphate regulates targeting of clathrin adaptor AP-1 complexes to the Golgi. Cell. 2003;114:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00603-2.
Achiriloaie M, Barylko B, Albanesi JP. Essential role of the dynamin pleckstrin homology domain in receptor-mediated endocytosis. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1410–5. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.2.1410.
Hyvönen M, et al. Structure of the binding site for inositol phosphates in a PH domain. EMBO J. 1995;14:4676–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00149.x.
Ding B, et al. Structures reveal a key mechanism of WAVE regulatory complex activation by Rac1 GTPase. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33174-3.
Hsieh TS, et al. Dynamic remodeling of host membranes by self-organizing bacterial effectors. Science. 2021;372:935–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8118.
Kervin, T. A. & Overduin, M. Regulation of the phosphoinositide code by phosphorylation of membrane readers. Cells. 2021;10:1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051205.
Kervin TA, Wiseman BC, Overduin M. Phosphoinositide recognition sites are blocked by metabolite attachment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:690461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.690461.
Okada AK, et al. Lysine acetylation regulates the interaction between proteins and membranes. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26657-2.
Bernardino de la Serna J, Schütz GJ, Eggeling C, Cebecauer M. There is no simple model of the plasma membrane organization. Front Cell Dev Biol 4;106 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00106.
Suzuki KGN, Kusumi A. Refinement of Singer-Nicolson fluid-mosaic model by microscopy imaging: Lipid rafts and actin-induced membrane compartmentalization. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2023;1865:184093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.184093.
Nicolson, G. L. Update of the 1972 Singer-Nicolson fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure. Discoveries (Craiova) 1, e3 (2013) https://doi.org/10.15190/d.2013.3.
Anderson RG, Jacobson K. A role for lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid domains. Science. 2002;296:1821–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068886.
Chen M, et al. The nuclear phosphoinositide response to stress. Cell Cycle. 2020;19:268–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2019.1711316.
Gemmer M, et al. Visualization of translation and protein biogenesis at the ER membrane. Nature. 2023;614:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05638-5.
Albert S, et al. Direct visualization of degradation microcompartments at the ER membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:1069–80. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905641117.
Acknowledgements
We thank Peijun Zhang and Simon Overduin for suggesting improvements to the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN- 2018- 04994) as well as a McCullough Seed Grant to MO and an NSERC Undergraduate Student Researcher Award as well as a Clarendon Fund Scholarship in partnership with a Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine Studentship and a Magdalen College Graduate Scholarship to TAK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TAK and MO: conceptualization, writing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Kervin, T.A., Overduin, M. Membranes are functionalized by a proteolipid code. BMC Biol 22, 46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01849-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01849-6