Coyne JA, Orr HA: Speciation. 2004, Sunderland: Sinauer
Google Scholar
Andersson M: Sexual Selection. 1994, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Google Scholar
Eisner T, Meinwald J: The chemistry of sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 50-55.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jones TM, Hamilton JGC: A role for pheromones in mate choice in a lekking sandfly. Anim Behav. 1998, 56: 891-898.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wyatt TD: Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Book
Google Scholar
Martin J, Lopez P: Links between male quality, male chemical signals, and female mate choice in Iberian Rock lizards. Funct Ecol. 2006, 20: 1087-1096.
Article
Google Scholar
Nieberding CM, de Vos H, Schneider MV, Lassance JM, Estramil N, Andersson J, Bång J, Hedenström E, Löfstedt C, Brakefield PM: The male sex pheromone of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an evolutionary analysis. PloS ONE. 2008, 3: e2751-
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vane-Wright VI, Boppré M: Visual and chemical signalling in butterflies: functional and phylogenetic perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993, 340: 197-205.
Article
Google Scholar
Johansson BG, Jones TM: The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev. 2007, 82: 265-289.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Löfstedt C: Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993, 340: 167-177.
Article
Google Scholar
Phelan LP: Evolution of mate-signaling in moths: phylogenetic considerations and predictions from the asymmetric tracking hypothesis. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Edited by: Choe JC, Crespi BJ. 1997, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240-256.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Birch MC, Poppy GM, Baker TC: Scents and eversible scent structures of male moths. Annu Rev Entomol. 1990, 35: 25-58.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Hillier NK, Vickers NJ: The role of heliothine hairpencil compounds in female Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) behaviour and mate acceptance. Chem Senses. 2004, 29: 499-511.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Phelan LP, Baker TC: Evolution of male pheromone in moths: reproductive isolation through sexual selection?. Science. 1987, 235: 205-207.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Löfstedt C, Vickers NJ, Roelofs WL, Baker TC: Diet related courtship success in the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Tortricidae). Oikos. 1989, 55: 402-408.
Article
Google Scholar
Zuk M: Parasite load, body size, and age of wild-caught male field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): Effects on sexual selection. Evolution. 1988, 42: 969-976.
Article
Google Scholar
Hansen TF, Price DK: Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes?. J Evol Biol. 1995, 8: 759-778.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones TM, Balmford A, Quinnel RJ: Adaptative female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000, 267: 681-686.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Beck CW, Powell LA: Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: Are older males better mates?. Evol Ecol Res. 2000, 2: 107-118.
Google Scholar
Wedell N, Ritchie MG: Male age, mating status and nuptial gift quality in a bushcricket. Anim Behav. 2004, 67: 1059-1065.
Article
Google Scholar
Butlin R: Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. Edited by: Lambert DM, Spencer HG. 1995, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 327-366.
Google Scholar
Eisner T, Meinwald J: Alkaloid-derived pheromones and sexual selection in Lepidoptera. Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Edited by: Blomquist GJ, Vogt RG. 2003, London: Elsevier Academic Press, 341-368.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Fadamiro HY, Baker TC: Reproductive performance and longevity of female European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: effects of multiple mating, delay in mating, and adult feeding. J Insect Physiol. 1999, 45: 385-392.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Torres-Vila LM, Jennions MD: Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2005, 57: 318-326.
Article
Google Scholar
Royer L, McNeil JN: Male investment in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct Ecol. 1993, 7: 209-215.
Article
Google Scholar
Royer L, McNeil JN: Evidence for a male sex pheromone in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Can Entomol. 1992, 124: 113-116.
Article
Google Scholar
Schlaepfer MA, McNeil JN: Are virgin male lepidopterans more successful in mate acquisition than previously mated individuals? A study of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Can J Zool. 2000, 78: 2045-2050.
Article
Google Scholar
Klun JA, Chapman OL, Mattes KC, Wojtkowski PW, Beroza M, Sonnet PE: Insect sex pheromones: minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Science. 1973, 181: 661-663.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kochansky J, Cardé RT, Liebherr J, Roelofs WL: Sex pheromone of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in New York. J Chem Ecol. 1975, 1: 225-231.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Glover TJ, Tang XH, Roelofs WL: Sex pheromone blend discrimination by male moths from E and Z strains of European corn borer. J Chem Ecol. 1987, 18: 143-151.
Article
Google Scholar
Roelofs WL, Glover T, Tang XH, Sreng I, Robbins P, Eckenrode C, Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Bengtsson BO: Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987, 84 (21): 7785-7789.
Article
Google Scholar
Linn CE, O'Connor M, Roelofs WL: Silent genes and rare males: a fresh look at pheromone blend response specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. J Insect Sci. 2003, 3: 15-
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Linn CE, Musto CJ, Roelofs WL: More rare males in Ostrinia: response of Asian corn borer moths to the sex pheromone of the European corn borer. J Chem Ecol. 2007, 33: 199-212.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cardé RT, Roelofs WL, Harrison RG, Vawter AT, Brussard PF, Mutuura A, Munroe E: European corn borer: pheromone polymorphism or sibling species?. Science. 1978, 199: 555-556.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klun JA, Huettel MD: Genetic regulation of sex pheromone production and response: interaction of sympatric pheromonal types of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Chem Ecol. 1988, 14: 2047-2061.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pélozuelo L, Meusnier S, Audiot P, Bourguet D, Ponsard S: Assortative mating between European corn borer pheromone races: beyond assortative meeting. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e555-
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dopman EB, Bogdanowicz SM, Harrison RG: Genetic mapping of sexual isolation between E and Z pheromone strains of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Genetics. 2004, 167: 301-309.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baker TC: Mechanism for saltational shifts in pheromone communication systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 13368-13370.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ishikawa Y, Takanashi T, Kim CG, Hoshizaki S, Tatsuki S, Huang Y: Ostrinia spp. in Japan: their host plants and sex pheromones. Entomol Exp Appl. 1999, 91: 237-244.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Roelofs WL, Liu W, Hao G, Jiao H, Rooney AP, Linn CE: Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 13621-13626.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Roelofs WL, Rooney AP: Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9179-9184.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reeves HK, Pfenning DW: Genetic biases for showy males: Are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 1089-1094.
Article
Google Scholar
Hill GE: Trait elaboration via adaptive mate choice: sexual conflict in the evolution of signals of male quality. Ethol Ecol Evol. 1994, 6: 351-370.
Article
Google Scholar
Fisher K, Perlick J, Galetz T: Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008, 275: 1517-1524.
Article
Google Scholar
Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH: Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 14338-14343.
Article
PubMed Central
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Koonin EV, Wolf YI: Evolutionary systems biology: links between gene evolution and function. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006, 17: 481-487.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pischedda A, Chippindale AK: Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PloS Biol. 2006, 4: e356-
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chapman T: Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Curr Biol. 2006, 16 (17): R744-754.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhao CH, Löfstedt C, Wang X: Sex pheromone biosynthesis of the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (II). Biosynthesis of (E)- and (Z)-12-tetradecenyl acetate involves Δ-14 desaturation. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1990, 15: 57-65.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cardé RT, Haynes KF: Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths. Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Edited by: Cardé RT, Millar JG. 2004, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283-332.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Newcombe RG: Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 857-872.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vassarstats: Web Site for Statistical Computation. [http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/VassarStats.html]
Buser HR, Arn H, Guerin P, Rauscher S: Determination of double bond position in mono-unsaturated acetates by mass spectrometry of dimethyl disulfide adducts. Anal Chem. 1983, 55: 818-822.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar