- Research article
- Open Access
Characterization of the dynamics and variability of neuronal subtype responses during growth, degrowth, and regeneration of Nematostella vectensis
BMC Biology volume 19, Article number: 104 (2021)
The ability to regenerate body parts is a feature of metazoan organisms and the focus of intense research aiming to understand its basis. A number of mechanisms involved in regeneration, such as proliferation and tissue remodeling, affect whole tissues; however, little is known on how distinctively different constituent cell types respond to the dynamics of regenerating tissues. Preliminary studies suggest that a number of organisms alter neuronal numbers to scale with changes in body size. In some species with the ability of whole-body axis regeneration, it has additionally been observed that regenerates are smaller than their pre-amputated parent, but maintain the correct morphological proportionality, suggesting that scaling of tissue and neuronal numbers also occurs. However, the cell dynamics and responses of neuronal subtypes during nervous system regeneration, scaling, and whole-body axis regeneration are not well understood in any system. The cnidarian sea anemone Nematostella vectensis is capable of whole-body axis regeneration, with a number of observations suggesting the ability to alter its size in response to changes in feeding. We took advantage of Nematostella’s transparent and “simple” body plan and the NvLWamide-like mCherry fluorescent reporter transgenic line to probe the response of neuron populations to variations in body size in vivo in adult animals during body scaling and regeneration.
We utilized the previously characterized NvLWamide-like::mCherry transgenic reporter line to determine the in vivo response of neuronal subtypes during growth, degrowth, and regeneration. Nematostella alters its size in response to caloric intake, and the nervous system responds by altering neuronal number to scale as the animal changes in size. Neuronal numbers in both the endodermal and ectodermal nerve nets decreased as animals shrunk, increased as they grew, and these changes were reversible. Whole-body axis regeneration resulted in regenerates that were smaller than their pre-amputated size, and the regenerated nerve nets were reduced in neuronal number. Different neuronal subtypes had distinct responses during regeneration, including consistent, not consistent, and conditional increases in number. Conditional responses were regulated, in part, by the size of the remnant fragment and the position of the amputation site. Regenerates and adults with reduced nerve nets displayed normal behaviors, indicating that the nerve net retains functionality as it scales.
These data suggest that the Nematostella nerve net is dynamic, capable of scaling with changes in body size, and that neuronal subtypes display differential regenerative responses, which we propose may be linked to the scale state of the regenerating animals.
We are interested in understanding the dynamics of neuronal subtypes during whole-body axis regeneration and changes in body size. Typically, whole-body axis regeneration occurs through a combination of remodeling of existing tissue and growth of new tissue through cell proliferation. Regenerates resulting from whole-body axis regeneration are typically smaller than the pre-amputated animal but display correct proportionality [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], suggesting that rescaling of some tissues and organ systems is part of the normal regenerative response [4, 7]. Many species are able to alter their adult size based on environmental conditions. For example, planarians grow and shrink in response to feeding and starvation, and the number of some neuronal subtypes in fixed planarians positively correlates with length [8,9,10]. This indicates that at least some nervous systems scale as adult body size is altered. However, tracking individual neuronal fates in vivo within the same individual in planarians is difficult. As such, investigating the dynamics of neuronal regenerative responses and scaling have been difficult to investigate.
The cnidarian sea anemone Nematostella vectensis possesses key features that make it well suited to investigate nervous system dynamics during growth, degrowth, and regeneration. Nematostella is diploblastic with a polyp bauplan typified by corals and anemones. The mouth, surrounded by tentacles, defines the oral end of the oral-aboral axis. It possesses a nerve net nervous system present in endodermal and ectodermal tissues that is easy to visualize using transgenic reporters because animals are optically clear at all life stages [2, 11]. We previously identified the NvLWamide-like::mCherry transgene, which is expressed in five neuronal subtypes distributed along the oral-aboral axis in both the endoderm and ectoderm, within the pharynx, and in the tentacles (Fig. 1a–c) [12, 13]. During growth from juvenile to adult, at least two NvLWamide-like subtypes increase proportionally with length (Fig. 1d,e) . Nematostella alter their size in response to nutrient uptake. During periods of constant feeding, they grow , and we noticed that animals left without food for a month or more were noticeably smaller, which is consistent with observations of the anemone Actinia equina that shrunk after being left unattended in labs for over 2 years during World War I . However, the dynamics of Nematostella growth and degrowth have not been quantified.
Whole-body axis regeneration of the oral structures is well characterized in Nematostella. Oral structures regenerate in a stereotyped manner in 6–7 days [7, 16,17,18]. Following amputation, a global increase in cell death enriched at the amputation site occurs from 1.5 to 12 h after amputation . The wound completes healing by 6 h, and cell proliferation enriched at the amputation site is first detected at 12 h post amputation. From 12 h to 7 days post amputation, cell proliferation in the blastema adds new endodermal and ectodermal tissue as the oral structures regenerate [7, 17]. Regenerates are smaller than their pre-amputated adult, but like planarians and Hydra they are correctly proportioned [7, 18, 20]. The fact that proportionality is maintained despite the smaller size of regenerates suggests that regeneration combines both tissue regrowth and tissue remodeling during whole-body axis regeneration. Cell tracking confirmed that portion of the regenerated pharynx is derived from remodeled mesenteries, but the extent of tissue remodeling during Nematostella regeneration is not yet known . The fact that Nematostella alters its size, regenerates are smaller than precut animals, and neurons within individuals can be tracked over time using transgenic animals makes Nematostella a potential model to determine how nervous systems respond during growth, degrowth, and whole-body axis regeneration.
Here we confirmed that Nematostella alters its size in response to feeding and tested the hypothesis that the nervous system scales with changes in size. Because regenerates are smaller than pre-amputated animals, we also tested whether or not the nerve net of regenerates is reduced and tracked the responses of individual neuronal subtypes during regeneration. To test these hypotheses, responses of NvLWamide-like::mCherry + neurons were quantified during body scaling throughout feeding, starvation, and whole-body axis regeneration. The Nematostella nervous system scales with changes in size by altering neuronal numbers and is reduced in regenerates. Despite differences in size, all nervous systems maintained known behaviors. Interestingly, we observed differential context-dependent responses for one neuronal subtype during regeneration. Collectively, these data suggest that the Nematostella nerve net is highly dynamic and scales with body size. To the best of our knowledge, these findings are the first direct confirmation that nervous systems adjust the number of neurons within individuals to maintain an appropriate scale state and are the first evidence that regenerating neuronal subtypes display variable responses during whole-body axis regeneration.
NvLWamide-like::mCherry + neural subtypes used in this study
We assessed the potential for five previously described neuronal subtypes that express the NvLWamide-like::mcherry transgene (mesentery, tentacular, pharyngeal, longitudinal, and tripolar) to be used to track neuronal dynamics during nervous system scaling and/or regeneration in this study (Fig. 1a–c) . The ruffled structure of the mesenteries made reliable quantification of mesentery neurons almost impossible, and thus, we excluded them from further characterization.
Pharyngeal and tentacular neurons can be scored for their presence or absence in regenerating animals. Both neuronal subtypes are found within their namesake structures (Fig. 1a-c) . In our previous study, accurate quantification of pharyngeal neurons was best achieved with fixation and confocal microscopy to overcome the autofluorescence of the pharynx (Fig. 1a, a’) . The need to fix animals prohibits tracking this neuronal subtype over time within live individuals. However, pharyngeal neurons are completely lost following amputation of oral structures, allowing their presence/absence to be scored during regeneration. We quantified the number of tentacular neurons in and across individuals. Tentacular neuronal number is not stereotyped between tentacles in a single individual or across individuals (Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2). The lack of an obvious correlation between tentacular neuronal number and size, and the potential challenge of repeated identification of the same tentacle in individuals make them less than ideal for tracking dynamics with changes in animal size. However, similar to the pharyngeal neurons, all tentacles are lost following amputation and the presence or absence of tentacular neurons is scorable in regenerates.
Longitudinal and tripolar neurons are expressed along the oral-aboral axis and are well suited to track dynamics in regenerating or scaling nervous systems. Both of these subtypes increase in number as animals grow from juvenile to adult polyps (Fig. 1b, c) and are easily quantified, because each neuronal subtype can be distinguished by their location and morphology (Fig. 1a–c) . Tripolar neurons have a columnar epithelial shaped soma, are located in the ectoderm, and have three neurites that project from the basal end of the cell originating at roughly equal intervals (Fig. 1a”—Superficial focus) . Longitudinal neurons are located in the endoderm within the eight paired longitudinal nerve tract bundles that run the length of the oral-aboral axis. In addition to being endodermal rather than ectodermal, they are easily distinguished from tripolar neurons because two neurites extend 180° to one another within longitudinal axon tracts and always along the oral aboral axis (Fig. 1a”—Deep focus). Bisection of adult polyps results in remnant fragments that contain both longitudinal and tripolar neurons. Regeneration can be assessed by comparing the number of neurons present in remnant fragments to the neuronal number in regenerates. Thus, we can quantify dynamic changes of these neuronal subtypes during regeneration and in adults as they change size.
We conclude that four neuronal subtypes (tentacular, pharyngeal, longitudinal, and tripolar) allow us to assess regeneration and/or adult nervous system scaling.
NvLWamide-like + longitudinal and tripolar neuron numbers correlate with polyp length
If tripolar and longitudinal neurons scale with length, their numbers should correlate with the length of adult polyps. To test this hypothesis, the length and neuronal numbers for 146 adult animals were plotted and the strength of association between these two factors was determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficients (Fig. 1d,e). Both longitudinal and tripolar neurons positively correlated with length. However, the strength of the correlation between length and longitudinal neurons was slightly greater than that between length and tripolar neurons (r144 = 0.854, p < 0.001; r143 = 0.791; p < 0.001 respectively). We conclude that both longitudinal and tripolar neuron numbers correlate with animal length, and that these neuronal subtypes are suited to test the hypothesis that the Nematostella nerve net dynamically scales with changes in size.
Nematostella undergoes growth and degrowth, and neuronal number scales with changes in size
To determine if at least portions of the Nematostella nerve net scale with changes in body size, animal length and neuronal number were followed in individuals undergoing growth and degrowth. We used two feeding regimes: starved and then fed (starved-then-fed) or fed and then starved (fed-then-starved). The initial design was to track length and neuronal numbers in replicate experiments over 14 weeks. Animals would be either starved or fed for 7 weeks, then the feeding regimen would be switched for the remaining 7 weeks. However, after 3 weeks of feeding, many of the fed-then-starved animals became large and accurately counting neurons within the time constraints of our paralytic would be challenging if animals continued to grow. We therefore switched the animals to starvation for the remaining 11 weeks (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S1; black lines). To account for variable lengths of animals at the start of the experiment, all changes in length were normalized to percent length for reporting purposes.
Relative to their starting length, the fed-then-starved animals grew significantly by 75.9% ± 20.8% after 3 weeks (Fig. 2a,c; black line; p = 0.008). Relative to their length at the time of their switch to starvation, the fed-then-starved animals significantly decreased in length by 38.6% ± 9.1% after 11 weeks (Fig. 2a,c; black line; p = 0.008). In the fed-then-starved group, the longitudinal and tripolar neurons significantly increased (longitudinal: p < 0.001; tripolar: p < 0.001) and decreased (longitudinal: p < 0.001; tripolar: p < 0.001) in number respectively as animals grew and shrank in length (Fig. 2d,e; black lines).
Relative to their starting length, the starved-then-fed animals decreased in length by 26.1% ± 7.4% after 7 weeks of starvation, which was trending towards significance (Fig. 2b,c; blue line, p = 0.098). Relative to their length when switched to feeding, the starved-then-fed group significantly increased in length by 164% ± 34.9% (Fig. 2b,c; blue line; p < 0.001). Similar to the previous group, the number of longitudinal and tripolar neurons significantly increased (p ≤ 0.001 for both) and decreased (longitudinal: p = 0.007; tripolar: p = 0.026) as animals grew and shrank, respectively (Fig. 2d,e; blue lines).
Resting Nematostella polyps are elongated with tentacles extended. However, they are rarely observed at their maximum extension, and whether their resting length is invariant has not been quantified. To be confident that we were observing growth and degrowth rather than variable states of resting elongation, we repeatedly measured the length of single animals across the size spectrum daily for 5 continuous days. Regardless of animal size, the resting length did vary, and the average variability was 14% ± 3% over 5 days (Additional file 3: Fig. S2a). As expected, the number of longitudinal neurons did not change over the same 5-day period (Additional file 3: Fig. S2b; p = 0.145).
The observed decreases in length of 26.1% and 38.6% over 7 and 11 weeks, respectively, and increases in length of 75.9% and 164% for 3 and 7 weeks, respectively (Fig. 2c), are outside of the 14% error rate for measuring length at a single time point. We conclude from these data that Nematostella increases and decreases length depending on caloric intake and that the nerve net responds by altering neuronal numbers to scale with size.
Starved animals maintain characteristic behaviors
To determine if starved animals retain normal behaviors with a reduced nerve net, we repeated our starvation experiments and tested the polyp’s ability to perform known behaviors before and after starvation (Fig. 3). As predicted, longitudinal and tripolar numbers were significantly decreased following starvation (Fig. 3a,b; p < 0.001 for both). Known behaviors for Nematostella are they produce peristaltic waves by generating contractions along the oral-aboral axis; they capture and ingest prey; they retract in response to mechanical stimuli; and they produce gametes in response to light and temperature cues [14, 21, 22]. Animals starved for 7 weeks or 11 weeks performed peristaltic waves, albeit at slightly reduced rates (Fig. 3c,d; starved 7 weeks: p = 0.005; starved 11 weeks: p = 0.014). To test their ability to retract from a mechanical stimulus, we developed a poking assay to test an animal’s ability to retract when poked at its oral end (see “Methods”). Prior to starvation, animals to be starved for either 7 or 11 weeks responded to touch 89.5% and 100% of the time, respectively. After 7 or 11 weeks of starvation, animals responded 89.5% and 83.3% of the time, respectively (Fig. 3e–j; Table 1; Additional file 4: Movie S1; Additional file 5: Movie S2). Reproductive ability was also tested in animals starved for 7 weeks. 6/6 females and 5/6 males produced and released gametes both before and after starvation. These findings argue that the reduced nerve net retains functions across scale states.
Tentacular and pharyngeal neurons regenerate
To investigate regeneration, we wanted to bisect animals into equal oral and aboral remnants (Fig. 4a, see “Methods”). To ensure animals were equally bisected, we developed a method to quantify the amputation site using longitudinal neurons. Longitudinal, but not tripolar, neurons are evenly distributed amongst equal quadrants along the oral-aboral axis (Additional file 3: Fig. S2c, d; Additional file 6; Fig. S3f; longitudinal: p = 0.33; tripolar: p < 0.001). Thus, comparing the number of longitudinal neurons present in pre- and post-cut animals immediately after bisection ensured amputation occurred at the intended position (Additional file 7: Fig. S4a-d, compare uncut timepoints with time 0 cut).
Consistent with previous studies, oral structures, including the mouth, pharynx, and tentacles, regenerated in the aboral remnant by 7dpa in 82/83 individuals and regenerates were smaller than their pre-amputated parent (Fig. 4b–e; Additional file 6 Fig. S3a-e, Additional file 7: Fig. S4e) [7, 17, 18, 20]. We also quantified the length of regenerates at 7 days post amputation (dpa) and compared it to their precut length. Based on unexpected size-dependent responses of longitudinal neurons during regeneration (described below), we grouped animals based on starting size for the remainder of our analyses. Animals were categorized as small (20–40 longitudinal neurons and ~ 2.5–5 mm), medium (41–60 longitudinal neurons and ~ 3.5–5.5 mm), medium-large (61–80 longitudinal neurons and ~ 5–7.5 mm), and large (81–100 longitudinal neurons and ~ 6.5–8.5 mm). At 7dpa, regenerates from small and medium animals bisected in half were slightly longer, relative to the length of the precut animal, than regenerates from medium-large and large animals, but this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 4b; Additional file 7: Fig. S4e; p = 0.875).
We next assessed the responses of individual neuronal subtypes. Pharyngeal and tentacular neurons were typically observed in their namesake structures by 72 h post amputation (hpa) and were identified in 100% of regenerated animals at 7dpa (Fig. 4e; Additional file 6: Fig. S3a-e). We conclude that both tentacular and pharyngeal neurons regenerated by 7dpa and that their regeneration coincided with the re-appearance of their corresponding tissues.
Longitudinal and tripolar neurons have variable responses in regenerating animals
To determine if longitudinal and tripolar neurons regenerated by 7dpa, we compared the number of neurons quantified at 7dpa in aboral remnants to the number of neurons immediately following amputation (time 0 cut) and to the number of neurons at 24hpa, which is after the wave of cell death  (Fig. 4; Additional file 7: Fig. S4). As mentioned above, all regenerates were initially treated as one group. However, we noticed a size-dependent variability in responses observed for longitudinal neurons during regeneration, which motivated us to track how neuronal numbers changed during regeneration of different size groups.
Regardless of size, there was a decrease in longitudinal neuron number from time 0 cut to 24hpa (Fig. 4f, Additional file 7: Fig. S4a,b; p < 0.001 for all size groups). The number of longitudinal neurons significantly increased between 24hpa and 7dpa in small and medium animals (Fig. 4f, red and green lines; p < 0.001 for both). The number of longitudinal neurons in 7dpa regenerates was statistically similar to the numbers observed in time 0 cut animals for both small and medium groups (small: p = 0.99, medium: p = 1.00). In contrast, longitudinal neurons did not increase from 24hpa to 7dpa in medium-large and large animals between 24hpa and 7dpa (Fig. 4f, yellow and blue lines; p = 0.25 and p = 0.34, respectively). To address the concern that larger animals had not completely regenerated by 7dpa, we performed additional replicates and allowed animals to regenerate to 14dpa. The additional time did not increase longitudinal numbers from those observed at 7dpa for any size category (Fig. 4g; p = 0.47 for all). We conclude that regenerates have less longitudinal neurons than their pre-amputated parents, which is consistent with their reduced size (Fig. 4b; Additional file 7: Fig. S4e). Additionally, we observed a size-dependent response during regeneration where an increase in longitudinal number from 24hpa to 7dpa occurred in small- and medium-sized animals, but not larger animals.
In contrast to longitudinal neurons, tripolar neurons did not increase in number in any group (Fig. 4h; Additional file 7: Fig. S4c,d). In small animals, tripolar neuron number was indistinguishable at time 0 cut, 24hpa, and 7dpa (Fig. 4h, red line; p = 1.00 for all comparisons), indicating that small regenerates did not lose tripolar neurons by 24hpa, nor did they gain any by 7dpa. In medium, medium-large, and large animals, the number of tripolar neurons decreased between time 0 cut and 24hpa (Fig. 4h; p = 0.001, p = 0.013, and p < 0.001, respectively). Medium and medium-large animals did not increase the number of tripolar numbers between 24hpa and 7dpa (p = 1.00 for both), and large animals further decreased tripolar neurons by 7dpa (p = 0.055). Allowing regenerates to continue to 14dpa did not increase tripolar neuron number compared to 7dpa counts (Fig. 4i; p = 0.12).
We conclude that during the initial regeneration of oral structures in bisected Nematostella, there are at least three distinct neuronal responses. The first is neuronal regeneration that occurs 100% of the time (e.g., pharyngeal and tentacular neurons), and the second is neurons that do not respond or regenerate (e.g., tripolar neurons). The third is a variable response, where neurons are decreased in number over the first 24hpa but only return to the number present immediately post amputation in a subset of animals (e.g., longitudinal neurons increase in the number between 24hpa and 7dpa to numbers similar to the time 0 cut fragment in small and medium animals). In summary, neuronal subtypes have differential responses during Nematostella oral regeneration.
Amputation site and size of aboral remnant impacts the regeneration of longitudinal neurons
Possible explanations for the variation in longitudinal neuron responses are that either the size of the remnant fragment or the size of the pre-amputated animal influenced their variable responses during regeneration. To test these hypotheses, the amputation sites of animals of different sizes were shifted to generate larger and smaller remnant fragments. If the size of the remnant fragment influences regeneration, the shifted amputation site should alter the regenerative response. However, if pre-amputation size influences the initial regenerative response, then altering the amputation site should not impact the longitudinal neuron response.
Smaller aboral fragments were generated from large animals by shifting the amputation site aborally to remove 75% of the oral-aboral axis (Fig. 5a). The resulting remnant fragment resembled the remnant of a medium animal bisected in half (Fig. 5c,d, compare black and faded green lines), and interestingly the number of longitudinal neurons increased between 24hpa and 7dpa (Fig. 5c, p = 0.046). Thus, altering the cut site of large animals to generate smaller remnant fragments shifted the longitudinal neurons to now respond and increase in number from 24hpa to 7dpa.
Orally shifting the amputation site of medium-sized animals to remove only 25% of the oral-aboral axis (Fig. 5b) generated remnant fragments similar to those generated by bisecting medium-large or large animals into equal halves (Fig. 5e,f, compare black and faded blue and yellow lines). In this case, no increase in the number of longitudinal neurons was observed between 24hpa and 7dpa (p = 1.00).
When the amputation site of small animals was orally shifted (Fig. 5b), the aboral remnant resembled a medium animal bisected into equal halves (Fig. 5g,h, black lines). While the average number of longitudinal neurons did increase between 24hpa and 7dpa, the change was not statistically significant (Fig. 5g,h, compare black and faded green lines; p = 0.47). It should be noted that neuronal numbers increased in some but not all regenerates. The variability in longitudinal neuron increase in small animals with orally shifted amputation sites was distinct from other experiments where the entire population more or less responded similarly (Additional file 7: Fig. S4b; Additional file 8: Fig. S5a-c). Regardless, these data suggest that the pre-amputation size of the animal was not a factor regulating the responses observed for longitudinal neurons during regeneration. Remnant fragment size did influence longitudinal neuron responses. However, longitudinal neurons in small animals with orally shifted cut sites did not respond, suggesting additional factors influence longitudinal neuron responses.
Form and function are restored in regenerated Nematostella by 7 days post amputation
We next sought to determine if normal functions are also restored by 7dpa, which would argue that the nervous system is functional following the initial regenerative response. At 7dpa and 14dpa, animals were able to catch and digest prey (Fig. 6a–c; Additional file 9: Movie S3; Additional file 10: Movie S4). Regenerates observed at 7dpa also had 4–5 peristaltic waves on average over a 5-min interval (Fig. 6a–c, arrows; Additional file 11: Movie S5), with no statistical difference in the number of waves between regenerates of different size categories (Fig. 6d; p = 0.35). This number is similar to the number of waves observed in uncut animals (t-test: t11 = 1.10, p = 0.30), and in previously published observations . We next examined poking-induced behaviors in pre- and post-regenerated animals of all size categories. In all cases, the same animal responded to the poking assay pre-bisection, 7dpa, and 14dpa 100% of the time (Fig. 6e–l; Table 1; Additional file 12: Movie S6; Additional file 13: Movie S7). It should be noted that the function of longitudinal and tripolar neurons remains unknown, and thus we could not directly test behaviors regulated by those neurons. Nevertheless, both form and function were restored by 7dpa, which suggests that regenerates have completed whole-body axis regeneration.
Nematostella alter size and neuronal number in response to caloric intake
We demonstrated that Nematostella decrease and increases in length in response to starvation and feeding, respectively. This is not surprising, as most Nematostella researchers have been aware of this phenomenon from anecdotal observations, planarians are known to undergo growth and degrowth during feeding and starvation, and anemones left unattended in a laboratory during World War I survived without food or water changes, but were dramatically reduced in size [8, 9, 15, 23,24,25,26]. In addition to the data presented here, a subpopulation of animals left unattended in our lab for well over 3 months during COVID-19 restrictions were dramatically reduced in size, but survived and regrew once fed. Our data confirmed that Nematostella is able to alter the size of the adult polyp, making this a viable system to investigate scaling of adult animals.
Neurons within the endoderm and ectoderm modulate their number to positively scale with length. Animals gain or lose neurons as they increase and decrease in length, respectively. Importantly, changes in neuronal number are reversible, which argues that the nervous system senses and responds to changes in size to maintain the proper proportion of neuronal cells. Neuronal scaling in planarians has been implied by the observation that the number of visual and brain neurons correlate with body length in fixed animals . Recent reports in Hydra, a cnidarian relative of Nematostella, suggest that neuronal scaling may occur in a number of cnidarian species . Interestingly, both Hydra and planarians are capable of whole-body axis regeneration, and their regenerates are also smaller than the precut animal, suggesting that neuronal scaling is a common phenomenon in animals whose adult size is dynamic.
Our data suggest that reduced nervous systems retain normal function. Polyps retract in response to being poked, catch and digest prey, coordinate peristaltic waves, and are able to perform reproductive behaviors. We infer from our studies that, regardless of scale state, the animals are able to perform complex behaviors. While the neural basis for these behaviors is not yet known, the ability to perform such behaviors suggests that the nerve net is able to function normally in the reduced scale state. For example, both starved and fed animals are capable of distinguishing between a potential predator (toothpick) and prey (brine shrimp), because while the animals responded to the poking assay with a defensive retraction, they readily captured and ingested food. Despite the limited number of functional assays in Nematostella, the range of behaviors that are unaffected by the total number of neurons suggests that the nervous system is functional in all scale states. Similarly, we are unaware of any evidence that smaller planarians have behavioral deficits compared to larger animals. Collectively, these observations indicate that neuronal scaling without changing behaviors occurs in both cnidarians and bilaterian species.
The most likely mechanism for altering neuronal number is through regulation of cell proliferation and cell death. Planarians alter their total cell numbers during growth and shrinking by modulating gene expression to regulate the balance between cell death and proliferation [24,25,26, 28]. It is possible that during scaling, changes in NvLWamide-like + neurons occur via transdifferentiation, which is documented in some cnidarians. However, while this possibility cannot be ruled out, it seems unlikely in this case since our data showed Nematostella increased and decreased in size. Fed Nematostella show signs of increased proliferation , and in other cnidarians increases in cell proliferation are associated with growth and tissue expansion through increasing cell number [17, 29,30,31]. Alternatively, cell death in response to nutrient deprivation is well documented in animals, and we observe a decrease in Nematostella size consistent with loss of cell number. Our data do not support the notion that NvLWamide-like neurons are undergoing transdifferation. While future efforts should confirm which processes are critical components of scaling, the interesting questions are as follows: how is neuronal subtype number monitored, and what mechanisms regulate programs to increase and decrease neuronal number as animals change in size?
Nervous system scale state may influence the regeneration of neuronal subtypes
The fact that nervous systems scale with size in Nematostella, and that regenerates are smaller than precut animals, suggests that the differential regenerative responses of individual neurons may be linked to the scale state of the regenerate. The two neuronal subtypes that we confirmed have reduced numbers in regenerates and scale with size are tripolar and longitudinal neurons. These two subtypes had variable responses during regeneration (no regeneration and a conditional increase in neuronal number, respectively). This suggests that the “acceptable range” of neurons needed to maintain the correct scale state varies for different subtypes. Support for this is that the variability of tripolar neurons was much higher than longitudinal neurons for each size group, and the distribution of tripolar neurons along the oral-aboral axis was not as uniform as longitudinal neurons, suggesting that there is more flexibility in the number and distribution of tripolar neurons required for proper function than exists for longitudinal neurons.
One criticism is that the variable responses reflect incomplete regeneration. However, this is unlikely in this study for multiple reasons. First, form and function were both restored in animals by 7dpa. Although the nervous system was reduced in overall number, all behaviors were present. More importantly, when nervous systems were reduced during starvation in the feed/starve experiments, their functions were not lost, suggesting that behaviors were maintained in nervous systems regardless of scale state. Second, no increase in neuronal number was observed when animals were allowed to regenerate for an additional week (14dpa). By 14dpa, animals had not been fed for almost 3 weeks. In the feed/starve experiment, the first noticeable decrease in neural number during starvation occurred in week 3. Thus, we suspect that extended regeneration without eating would not improve neuronal regeneration. We do expect that feeding regenerates would increase both tripolar and longitudinal neurons. However, we would not characterize this as regeneration because the same phenomenon is observed in fed un-lesioned animals. Third, our feed-starve data and evidence from other anemones suggest that adult sea anemones, including Nematostella, do not have a fixed size, but rather alter their size based on caloric intake [27, 30, 32]. Thus, form and function can be restored in regenerates that are smaller than their precut parent, and regeneration does not require returning to a precut length. This seems to be a common feature of animals capable of whole-body axis regeneration, as many of them also have adults whose size is dynamic. The fact that 7dpa animals possessed the ability to feed, digest food, and display other known behaviors strongly indicates that regeneration had completed. We are confident that Nematostella possesses neurons that display differential responses during regeneration of oral structures.
Differential regeneration of neuronal subtypes during whole-body axis regeneration
The conditional response of longitudinal neurons is interesting. The data suggest that smaller remnants need to generate new neurons for the regenerated nervous system to be at the correct scale state, whereas larger remnants do not. Current explanations for why are speculative, but the mechanisms of regeneration may vary based on the size of the remnant fragment and amputation site. Unlike Hydra, Nematostella regeneration requires cell proliferation [7, 17]. However, evidence suggests that remodeling of remnant tissue also occurs . EdU labeling indicates that larger animals still utilize cell proliferation during regeneration (Additional file 14: Fig. S6), but perhaps they shift the balance between remodeling and proliferation to favor remodeling. This idea is supported by our observation that, on average, regenerates generated from small and medium animals bisected in half tended to be slightly longer than regenerates from medium-large and large animals when normalized to their pre-amputated length. An alternative hypothesis is that the scale state relationship of longitudinal neurons to length is not linear across all sizes, with larger animals adding new neurons at a slower rate. In this case, the larger remnant fragments have a sufficient number of neurons to be within the acceptable range for that scale state. To distinguish between these models will require identifying a paralytic that also causes Nematostella to stretch to their maximal extended length. This would minimize potential variability in length measurements and allow researchers to (1) improve the resolution and accuracy of the ratios for length to neuron number, and (2) determine if smaller remnants regenerate more new tissue than longer remnants.
The failure of longitudinal neurons to increase in number in small animals with orally shifted amputation sites challenges both of these models, but it does not eliminate them. The remnant fragment was small enough that an increased longitudinal number was predicted by the “remnant fragment size influences regenerative response” model. Intriguing to us was the fact that the responses of longitudinal neurons in small animals with orally shifted amputation sites was much more heterogeneous than the other experiments (Additional file 7: Fig. S4; Additional file 8: Fig. S5). The orally shifted amputation sites in small animals were proximal to the mouth and pharynx, whereas other amputations performed in this study were much more distal to the oral structures. It is possible that oral amputations close enough to the mouth resemble loss of a particular structure (i.e., amputation of limb) rather than whole-body axis regeneration, and subsequently the regenerative mechanisms are distinct. This could explain the variability in our data, and it offers additional hypotheses to test in the future.
The ability to observe and quantify neuronal subtypes makes Nematostella a powerful model to investigate neurogenesis in the context of both regeneration and whole-body scaling. Our data suggest that the regenerative responses of neuronal subtypes in Nematostella are variable during regeneration of oral structures and that the nervous system scales with size. We suspect that variable neuronal responses are linked to regenerates rescaling their nervous system to accommodate their smaller size, but additional studies are necessary to validate this hypothesis. How Nematostella control the regeneration and incorporation of new neurons into the existing nerve net, and how they scale the numbers of these neurons to body size in real time remain unknown, but both are exciting areas for future investigation. Lastly, our data imply that experiments aimed at uncovering the molecular mechanisms regulating neural regeneration in Nematostella require careful consideration of the differential responses of individual neuronal subtypes during regeneration when designing experiments and interpreting results.
All animals were kept at room temperature and fed rotifers or crushed brine shrimp until they reached the young juvenile adult stage, at which time they were transferred to 17 °C in the dark and fed brine shrimp 4×/week, unless otherwise noted for experimental purposes. Nematostella were maintained in 1/3× artificial sea water, (Nematostella medium) at a pH of 8.1–8.2, that was changed once per week.
Nematostella were relaxed in 7.14% (wt/vol) MgCl2 in Nematostella medium for ~ 10 min prior to length measurement, neural quantification, imaging, or bisection. No paralytic was used during behavioral experiments. The lengths of relaxed animals were measured in millimeters with a ruler placed under a Petri dish containing the animal.
Quantification and imaging of NvLWamide-like::mCherry-expressing animals
To quantify longitudinal and tripolar neuron numbers, we first determined that the number of neurons in each radial segment were similar to one another within each individual animal (Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4). The minimal variation allowed us to quantify neuronal number in an individual by calculating the representative number of longitudinal and tripolar neurons present by averaging 2–4 segments for each animal/time point (Additional file 6: Fig S3f). The same individual was kept isolated so that the number of neurons present within one animal could be tracked over time.
NvLWamide-like::mCherry tripolar and longitudinal neurons were counted on live animals under a dissection microscope (Nikon SMZ1270), on live animals placed under a slide with a raised coverslip on a compound microscope (Nikon NTi), or on full-length images of Nematostella captured on a Nikon Nti. All quantifications were done by hand, because it was more reliable than images acquired on a fluorescent compound scope and these animals were too large to generate confocal montages covering the whole animal in 20 min or less, which is the upper limit of the amount of time these animals tolerate the paralytic with no detrimental effects.
Live images of NvLWamide-like::mCherry-expressing animals were taken on a Nikon NTi with a Nikon DS-Ri2 color camera with Nikon Elements software. Large full-length images are composed of several images stitched together. Confocal images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 880 with LSM software and processed using Imaris 8.4.1 software (Bitplane LLC) to create 3D images from serial optical sections (z-stacks). Images were then cropped and assembled using Photoshop and Illustrator (Adobe).
Live video was captured on a Nikon Eclipse E1000 microscope with Nikon Imaging software or a Nikon dissection microscope (Nikon SMZ1270) with a USB camera attachment. Movies were processed with ImageJ/Fiji software and screen shots were obtained from individual frames, then cropped and assembled using Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator.
For the quantification of longitudinal and tripolar NvLWamide-like::mCherry expressing neuronal subtypes during regeneration, only animals containing 20–100 longitudinal neurons were used, which were typically 2.5 to 9 mm long (Additional file 7: Fig. S4a, b, e). This size range represents the sizes of naturally occurring wild-caught animals found along the East Coast of the USA (Adam Reitzel, University of North Carolina, Charlottesville, NC, personal communication, 11/2018).
Longitudinal and tripolar neurons were quantified first on the uncut animal, then immediately following bisection (time 0 cut), 24 h post amputation (hpa), and 7 days post amputation (dpa). For some regenerating animals, additional counts were conducted at 14dpa. Animals were bisected in half with the amputation site at the oral-aboral midpoint (~ 50% body removed), bisected below the pharynx (“oral shift”, ~ 25% removed), or bisected at the aboral end (“aboral shift”, ~ 75% removed).
We developed a strategy to ensure the amputation sites were reproducibly positioned in the middle 50% of the animal, oral 75% of the animal, or aboral 25% of the animal. Longitudinal neurons are equally distributed along the oral-aboral axis (Additional file 3: Fig. S2c). Thus, confirmation of the cut sites was achieved by comparing the number of neurons in the remnant fragment immediately after amputation with the number of total neurons present in the precut animal.
Following quantification and/or bisection, the remnant aboral fragment was washed with Nematostella medium, then placed in the dark at room temperature. Prior to the start of the experiment, animals were starved for 3–4 days [7, 17]. Animals were not fed for the duration of the regeneration experiments.
For each animal, the number of longitudinal and tripolar neurons were counted at the beginning of the experiment, at the time of their feeding regime switch (Starved-then-fed: 7 weeks later; fed-then-starved: 3 weeks later), and at the end of the 14-week experiment (starved-then-fed: 7 weeks later; fed-then-starved: 11 weeks later). All animals were maintained on the same normal feeding schedule until the start of the experiment. At this point, animals were randomly assigned to either the starved-then-feed group or the fed-then-starved group, and their initial starting neural counts were taken. Animals on the feeding regime were fed brine shrimp 2×/week plus oyster 1×/week. All animals were given weekly water changes.
Animals were transferred to individual dishes containing Nematostella medium and observed under a dissection microscope. Once the animal had relaxed its tentacles, a toothpick was slowly inserted into the medium so as to not disturb the animal prematurely. The animal was then “poked” with the tip of the toothpick at the oral region. The entire assay was video recorded and analyzed to determine the animal’s response. Following the “poking assay,” the animal was left alone in the dish until it relaxed again, upon which time the poking assay was performed again. The assay was performed 3 consecutive times. A positive response was determined if the animal responded to being touched with a toothpick by retracting some or all of its tentacles, scrunching or retracting in its mouth (oral region), or retracting its entire body. To be considered responsive, the animal had to react in at least 1 out of the 3 poking assays performed. The poking assay was done in a repeated fashion, with each animal being tested at the beginning and end of the experimental treatment.
Animals were individually placed in dishes filled with Nematostella medium and observed under a dissection scope. Data collection did not begin until animals relaxed their tentacles and/or at least 75% of their body column. Once relaxed, animals were observed for 5 continuous minutes and the number of peristaltic waves that occurred during this time was recorded. A peristaltic wave was defined as an inward radial contraction that propagated down the body column in an oral to aboral direction . Waves that were in progress at the start of data collection were counted and so were waves that did not go to completion by the end of the observation period. In the regeneration experiment, the number of waves observed/5 min was compared between animals categorized as small, medium, medium-large, and large. In the feed/starve experiment, animals were observed at the beginning and end of either a 7- or 11-week starvation period.
Animals were transferred to individual dishes filled with Nematostella medium and observed using a dissection microscope. Once an animal relaxed its tentacles, freshly hatched brine shrimp (5–10) were added to the dish. Animals were first observed for their ability to capture and ingest brine shrimp. Once at least one was captured, the rest of the brine shrimp were removed and the animal was left overnight. The following day, the dish was checked for evidence of expelled brine shrimp that had not been digested following capture and ingestion.
Animals were kept individually in dishes filled with Nematostella medium. Each individual was spawned prior to the starvation period to determine their gametic sex. Those that released eggs were designated as female and those that released sperm were designated as male. Egg clutches are visible to the naked eye and are therefore easily scored for their presence or absence. Sperm release was determined by observing if a clutch of eggs from an isolated known female would be fertilized (scored by the presence of cleaving embryos) when given water from an unidentified individual’s dish. As a false-positive control, half of each known female’s eggs were set aside and observed to make sure no development occurred. Experimental animals were starved for 7 weeks while control animals were fed freshly hatched brine shrimp once per week over 7 weeks. All animals were kept in the dark at 17 °C and received weekly water changes. After 7 weeks, all animals were placed on a light box in order to stimulate reproductive behavior. Whether or not animals released gametes was observed using the methods described above.
EdU incorporation was carried out as previously described . Animals were incubated with 330 μM EdU in Nematostella medium for 30 min, then fixed as previously described and dehydrated to 100% MeOH and stored at − 20 °C. Following rehydration, samples were permeabilized in PBT (PBS with 0.5% Triton X-100, Sigma) for ~ 2 h. Animals were then treated with the reaction cocktail (prepared following the Click-It protocol provided by the manufacturer, with the exception of doubling the amount of Alexa Fluor Azide) at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. Following 5 long washes in PBT, the animals were labeled with propidium iodide for 1 h while rocking, washed 5× in PBT, and finally transferred to 90% glycerol for imaging.
Two replicate data sets were initially collected for the feed-starve experiment by two different researchers. These data sets were combined for analysis because there was no significant difference in how individuals responded across all time points based on the researcher that collected the data (mixed ANOVA, time point x researcher: length: F2,34 = 0.08, p = 0.92; longitudinal: F2,36 = 0.52, p = 0.60; tripolar: F2,36 = 0.60, p = 0.46). For the regeneration and feed-starve experiments, mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used to analyze each dependent variable (i.e., body length, and longitudinal and tripolar neurons). For both experiments, each observation of an individual over time served as the within-subject factor (regeneration experiment: time 0 cut, 24hpa, 7dpa; feed/starve experiment: time 0, week of feeding regime switch, week 14). The between subject factors used were animal size category (small: 20–40 mm, medium: 41–60 mm, medium-large: 61–80 mm, large: 81–100 mm) and assigned feeding group (feed-starve or starve-feed) for the regeneration and feed/starve experiments, respectively. To determine if regeneration of longitudinal and tripolar neurons was complete by 7dpa, additional mixed ANOVAs were used to compare neuron counts at 7dpa and 14dpa by size category. A repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine if longitudinal and tripolar neurons were evenly distributed within equal body column quadrants. Data used for ANOVA tests met assumptions of normality and homogeneity. Greenhouse-Geisser corrected F-statistics are reported if sphericity was violated (i.e., Fig. 4f,h). When omnibus ANOVA results were significant, post hoc testing was performed using Bonferroni corrections in order to maintain tight control over the type 1 error rate. Effect sizes are reported as partial eta2 (ηp2). Full ANOVA model results are reported in Table S5 (Additional file 15: Table S5) for all significant omnibus analyses. Two-sided paired t-tests were used to compare individual changes in the number of peristaltic waves, longitudinal and tripolar neurons, or length at two time points. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
Availability of data and materials
All data were generated and analyzed by the authors of this study and are included in this published article and its supplementary information files (see Additional file 16).
Randolph H. Observations and experiments on regeneration in planarians; 1897. p. 1–31.
Rentzsch F, Layden M, Manuel M. The cellular and molecular basis of cnidarian neurogenesis. WIREs Dev Biol. 2016;6(1):e257. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.257.
Thommen A, Werner S, Frank O, Phillipp J, Knittelfelder O, Quek Y, et al. Body size-dependent energy storage causes Kleiber’s law scaling of the metabolic rate in planarians. eLIFE. 2019;8:e38187. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38187.005.
Birkholz TR, Van Huizen AV, Beane WS. Staying in shape: planarians as a model for understanding regenerative morphology. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;87:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.04.014.
Miljkovic-Licina M, Chera S, Ghila L, Galliot B. Head regeneration in wild-type hydra requires de novo neurogenesis. Development. 2007;134:1191–201.
Holstein TW, Hobmayer E, Technau U. Cnidarians: an evolutionarily conserved model system for regeneration? Dev Dyn. 2003;226(2):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10227.
Amiel AR, Johnston HT, Nedoncelle K, Warner JF, Ferreira S, Röttinger E. Characterization of morphological and cellular events underlying oral regeneration in the sea anemone. Nematostella Vecten IJMS. 2015;16(12):28449–71. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161226100.
Takeda H, Nishimura K, Agata K. Planarians maintain a constant ratio of different cell types during changes in body size by using the stem cell system. Zool Sci. 2009;26(12):805–13. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.26.805.
Oviedo NJ, Newmark PA, Sánchez AA. Allometric scaling and proportion regulation in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Dev Dyn. 2003;226(2):326–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10228.
Hill EM, Petersen CP. Wnt/notum spatial feedback inhibition controls neoblast differentiation to regulate reversible growth of the planarian brain. Development. 2015;142(24):4217–29. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.123612.
Nakanishi N, Renfer E, Technau U, Rentzsch F. Nervous systems of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis are generated by ectoderm and endoderm and shaped by distinct mechanisms. Development. 2012;139:347–57.
Layden MJ, Johnston H, Amiel AR, Havrilak J, Steinworth B, Chock T, et al. MAPK signaling is necessary for neurogenesis in Nematostella vectensis. BMC Biol. 2016;14:61.
Havrilak JA, Faltine-Gonzalez D, Wen Y, Fodera D, Simpson AC, Magie CR, et al. Characterization of NvLWamide-like neurons reveals stereotypy in Nematostella nerve net development. Dev Biol. 2017;431(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.028.
Hand C, Uhlinger KR. The culture, sexual and asexual reproduction, and growth of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Biol Bull. 1992;182(2):169–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542110.
Stephenson TA. British sea anemones; 1935. p. 1–480.
Layden MJ, Rentzsch F, Röttinger E. The rise of the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis as a model system to investigate development and regeneration. WIREs Dev Biol. 2016;5(4):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.222..
Passamaneck YJ, Martindale MQ. Cell proliferation is necessary for the regeneration of oral structures in the anthozoan cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. BMC Dev Biol. 2012;12:34.
Bossert PE, Dunn MP, Thomsen GH. A staging system for the regeneration of a polyp from the aboral physa of the anthozoan cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. Dev Dyn. 2013;242(11):1320–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24021.
Warner JF, Amiel AR, Johnston H, Röttinger E. Regeneration is a partial redeployment of the embryonic gene network. bioRxiv. 2019;121:1731–28.
Reitzel AM, Burton PM, Krone C, Finnerty JR. Comparison of developmental trajectories in the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis: embryogenesis, regeneration, and two forms of asexual fission. Invertebr Biol. 2007;126(2):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2007.00081.x.
Faltine-Gonzalez DZ, Layden MJ. Characterization of nAChRs in Nematostella vectensis supports neuronal and non-neuronal roles in the cnidarian–bilaterian common ancestor. Evodevo. 2019;10(27):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-019-0136-3.
Fritzenwanker JH, Technau U. Induction of gametogenesis in the basal cnidarian Nematostella vectensis (Anthozoa). Dev Genes Evol. 2002;212(2):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-002-0214-7.
González-Estévez C, Felix DA, Rodríguez-Esteban G, Aboobaker AA. Decreased neoblast progeny and increased cell death during starvation-induced planarian degrowth. Int J Dev Biol. 2012;56(1-2-3):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.113452cg.
Baguna J, Romero R. Romero. Quantitative anlaysis of cell types during growth, degrowth, and regeneration in the planarians Dugesia mediterranea and Dugesia tigrina. Hydrobiologia. 1981;84(1):181–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026179.
Baguñà J, Romero R, Salo E, Collet J, Auladell C, Ribas M, et al. Growth, degrowth, and regeneration as developmental phenomena in adult freshwater planarians. In: Marthy HJ, editor. Experimental embryology in aquatic plants and animals; 1990. p. 129–62.
Romero R, Baguñà J. Quantitative cellular analysis of growth and reproduction in freshwater planarians (Turbellaria; Tricladida). I A cellular description of the intact organism. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 1991;19:157–65.
Tzouanas CN, Kim S, Badhiwala KN, Avants BW, Robinson JT. Stable behavioral and neural responses to thermal stimulation despite large changes in the hydra vulgarisnervous system. bioRxiv. 2020;198:2055LP–24.
Pascual-Carreras E, Marin-Barba M, Herrera-Úbeda C, Font-Martín D, Eckelt K, de Sousa N, et al. Planarian cell number depends on blitzschnell, a novel gene family that balances cell proliferation and cell death. Development. 2020;147:dev184044–14.
Ikmi A, Steenbergen PJ, Anzo M, McMullen MR, Stokkermans A, Ellington LR, et al. Feeding-dependent tentacle development in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(4399):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18133-0.
Gurska D, Garm A. Cell proliferation in Cubozoan jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora and Alatina moseri. Steele RE, editor. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102628–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102628.
Fritz AE, Ikmi A, Seidel C, Paulson A, Gibson MC. Mechanisms of tentacle morphogenesis in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Development. 2013;140(10):2212–23. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.088260.
Chera S, Buzgariu W, Ghila L, Galliot B. Autophagy in hydra: a response to starvation and stress in early animal evolution. BBA - Mol Cell Res. 2009;1793:1432–43.
We would like to thank Aldine Amiel and Eric Röttinger for critically reading this manuscript and providing feedback, as well as their personal communications regarding cell death in starved animals. We would also like to thank Amber Rice and Bridget Dever for their input on the appropriate statistical methods to evaluate our data, and Adam Reitzel for providing insights about what size ranges we should target to represent adult animals found in the wild. We thank David Balli and Omar Ahmed for providing help with R software and construction of the line graphs.
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health Award Number R01GM127615.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Average number of tentacular neurons per tentacle in different sized animals. Table S2. Number of tentacular neurons in each tentacle of animals of different sizes. Table S3. Number of longitudinal neurons counted in each longitudinal track. Table S4. Number of tripolar neurons counted in each radial segment.
Individual longitudinal and tripolar neuron data from the feed/starve experiment. a, b Neurons were quantified in twenty individuals (10/treatment) at the start, time of feeding regime switch, and end of the feed/starve experiment. These data were used to determine the average responses of fed-then-starved and starved-then-fed animals, which are shown in Fig. 2. See Additional file 15 for statistical analyses.
Length measurements and neural quantifications in Nematostella. a The average variability in the measured length of the same animal over 5 consecutive days was 14% ± 3%. b The number of longitudinal neurons did not change over the same 5 day period in the same animals as A (t11 = -1.57, p = 0.145). c, d Quantification of the number of longitudinal and tripolar neurons along the oral-aboral axis in each of the 4 equal quarters. Gray and white bars distinguish the 4 quadrants. Longitudinal neurons are equally distributed along the oral-aboral axis (F3,45 = 1.18, p = 0.33, ηp2 = 0.73; n = 10), but tripolar neurons are not (F3,24 = 20.97, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.72; n = 8). Each line represents an individual animal.
Regeneration of oral structures and neurons in NvLWamide-like::mCherry animals following bisection along the oral-aboral axis. a Regenerated oral structures, including a mouth, pharynx (arrow), and tentacles (arrowhead) at 7dpa. a’ New neurons are observed in the regenerated oral structures, including pharyngeal (arrow) and tentacular (arrowhead) neurons. b Remnant fragment at 24hpa. No new structures were observed at this time point. c Tentacle buds were visible in the remnant fragment at 48hpa. Longitudinal (green arrowhead) and tripolar (purple arrowhead) neurons were observed. Regenerated pharyngeal neurons were also present in the regenerating pharynx (orange arrowhead). d Pharyngeal (orange arrowhead) and tentacular (red arrowhead) neurons were clearly visible in these regenerating structures by 72hpa. e Clearly regenerated pharyngeal (orange arrowhead) and tentacular (red arrowhead) neurons are seen at 96hpa. Longitudinal neurons (green arrowhead) and tripolar neurons (purple arrowhead) also populated the regenerated tissue, but whether these were regenerated neurons or from the remnant was undetermined. f Example of how longitudinal (green arrowheads) and tripolar (purple arrowheads) were quantified within a longitudinal track and radial segment, respectively. Note that for regeneration and feed-starve experiments, neuron counts were performed live under a dissection scope and not from images. Asterisks indicate oral opening.
Quantification of neuronal numbers during oral regeneration. a, c Quantification of mean longitudinal and tripolar neurons before amputation (uncut), immediately following bisection at the oral-aboral axis midline (time 0 cut), 24 hours post amputation (hpa), and at completion of regeneration 7 days post amputation (dpa). Black rectangles show time points included in analyses as seen in Fig. 4f & h. b, d Population data showing the time course for the average number of longitudinal neurons and tripolar neurons per 2-4 radial segments in individual regenerating animals bisected in half (n = 83 animals). Neuronal numbers did not return to levels present in the uncut animal. Data represented in b & d are the same dataset grouped by starting size and averaged in a & c and Fig. 4f & h. e Population data showing lengths for individual animals before they were amputated (uncut) and 7dpa. Regenerated animals never re-grew back to their original length (t30 = 8.65, p < 0.001; n = 31; see Fig. 4b for percent change by size). Small animals are represented in red, medium in green, medium-large in orange, and large in blue. Data points and bars represent means ± SEM.
Individual longitudinal neuron data from the shifted amputation site experiments. a Regenerates from an aborally shifted amputation site in large animals increased their longitudinal neurons back to similar numbers present at the time of bisection (n = 10). b Regenerates from orally shifted amputation sites in medium animals did not increase their longitudinal neurons (n = 13). c Regenerates from orally shifted amputation sites in small animals did not increase their longitudinal neurons (n = 13). Each line represents an individual animal. These data were used to determine the average responses shown in Fig. 5. See Additional file 15 for statistical analyses.
Detection of proliferating cells in “large” Nematostella during oral regeneration. a EdU (green) is detected at 48hpa in the oral-most region of large regenerating animals bisected in half. b EdU overlaid with propidium iodide (PI, red) stain in the same animal as a, with yellow color showing co-expression. c Higher magnification image of the same animal, showing EdU detection in both the ectoderm and endoderm, suggesting both tissue layers proliferate during oral regeneration (n = 3 large animals). Asterisks indicate oral opening. Scale bars for a & b = 200μm; c= 50μm.
Supplemental ANOVA tables.
Data collected for this study.
About this article
Cite this article
Havrilak, J.A., Al-Shaer, L., Baban, N. et al. Characterization of the dynamics and variability of neuronal subtype responses during growth, degrowth, and regeneration of Nematostella vectensis. BMC Biol 19, 104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01038-9
- Nerve net
- Regenerative neurogenesis
- Nervous system scalability