Skip to main content
Download PDF

Paternal hypoxia exposure primes offspring for increased hypoxia resistance

BMC Biology volume 20, Article number: 185 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In a time of rapid environmental change, understanding how the challenges experienced by one generation can influence the fitness of future generations is critically needed. Using tolerance assays and transcriptomic and methylome approaches, we use zebrafish as a model to investigate cross-generational acclimation to hypoxia.

Results

We show that short-term paternal exposure to hypoxia endows offspring with greater tolerance to acute hypoxia. We detected two hemoglobin genes that are significantly upregulated by more than 6-fold in the offspring of hypoxia exposed males. Moreover, the offspring which maintained equilibrium the longest showed greatest upregulation in hemoglobin expression. We did not detect differential methylation at any of the differentially expressed genes, suggesting that other epigenetic mechanisms are responsible for alterations in gene expression.

Conclusions

Overall, our findings suggest that an epigenetic memory of past hypoxia exposure is maintained and that this environmentally induced information is transferred to subsequent generations, pre-acclimating progeny to cope with hypoxic conditions.

Background

Paradigm-shifting research has revealed that the life-history experiences of parents can influence the phenotype of their offspring through non-genetic mechanisms [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Non-genetically transmitted phenotypes can be generated by diverse environmental effects, affecting a wide array of offspring traits, some positively and others negatively [3]. Work on mice has demonstrated that learned fear responses [4, 5] and metabolic alterations associated with undernourishment can be inherited via sperm [6]. These studies suggest that parents can transmit information that may benefit offspring survival. Through this transgenerational plasticity (also known as transgenerational acclimation [16,17,18]), parents may provide offspring with increased tolerance to environmental perturbations, such as contaminants [1,2,3,4,5], food shortages [19, 20], carbon dioxide [21,22,23,24], hypoxia [25], salinity [26,27,28], and temperature [20, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Studies have tended to focus on maternal transgenerational plasticity, or have exposed both parents to the environmental perturbation, making it impossible to disentangle the relative roles of mothers and fathers in altering offspring phenotype [36, 37]. Thus, a better understanding of the specific role of paternal effects in transgenerational plasticity is needed, especially considering environmental specific information is likely transferred via sperm (see below). Further, the underlying molecular processes have been identified in a just a few studies [19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 38]. For example, metabolic genes are upregulated transgenerationally in the damselfish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus), suggesting shifts in energy production for maintaining performance at elevated temperatures [31]. Potential epigenetic mechanisms for this transgenerational acclimation have been detected, via differential methylation of genes involved in energy homeostasis, mitochondrial activity, and oxygen consumption [33]. In a time of rapid environmental change, a better understanding of how environmental challenges experienced by organisms could increase the fitness of future generations to survive these same stressors is critically needed.

Hypoxia, defined as sufficiently low levels of oxygen to deprive tissues of oxygen, is a major physiological challenge [39,40,41], precipitating conserved physiological effects in a wide array of vertebrates [42,43,44]. The aerobic lifestyle of most animals requires a constant supply of sufficient oxygen, and low oxygen levels constitute a major environmental threat [45]. Hypoxia is particularly well-studied in aquatic species, where physiological stress of hypoxia challenges many freshwater and marine organisms, and hypoxia is one of the most widespread issues in aquatic habitats due to the rise of dead zones and climate change [39, 46]. Thus, it is now more important than ever to understand how different aquatic species will respond to environmental hypoxia.

The negative impacts of hypoxia on growth and reproduction are well-recognized [44, 47, 48], with recent studies also discovering transgenerational effects, whereby marine medaka fish (Oryzias melastigma) exposed to hypoxia show reproductive impairments in F1 and F2 generations, suggesting that hypoxia might pose a long-lasting threat to fish populations [40, 49]. Fishes are notable for their adaptive abilities to acclimate to hypoxic conditions [39, 50,51,52,53], including physiological, morphological, and behavioral phenotypic responses. Remarkably, goldfish (Carassius auratus) and crucian carp (Carassius carassius) exhibit gill remodeling in response to hypoxia exposure [54, 55]. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and larvae modify cardiac activity and blood vessel formation in response to hypoxic exposures [56]. In addition to morphological alternations, gene expression can also be affected by hypoxic conditions. In zebrafish gill tissue, more than 300 genes are differentially expressed between hypoxia exposed individuals versus controls; these changes in gene expression are correlated with morphological changes in gill structure, such as increased surface area of gill tissue [57]. Prolonged exposure to low oxygen has been shown to improve hypoxia tolerance in Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii [58] and snapper (Pagrus auratus [59]). Likewise, pre-acclimation of zebrafish larvae to mild hypoxia significantly improves their resistance to lethal hypoxia, and upregulation of some oxygen transport genes are associated with this acclimation [41]. Intriguingly, zebrafish offspring of males and females exposed to chronic hypoxia have a higher resistance to acute hypoxia than those of controls [25], despite the offspring having never been exposed to hypoxia, suggesting that parents may pass on information that may pre-acclimate offspring to cope with hypoxic conditions.

Gene expression and transgenerational effects can be regulated by epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding microRNAs [3]. For example, in the marine medaka studies, transgenerational effects are associated with differential methylation in sperm and ovary, with altered gene expression in genes known to be associated with spermatogenesis and gene silencing [40] and cell cycle control and cell apoptosis [49]. DNA methylation has also been investigated as a means underlying transgenerational effects of chemical exposures in zebrafish [60], and the paternal methylome is believed to be stably transmitted to offspring in zebrafish [61, 62] without global reprogramming in primoridal germ cells [63, 64], potentially facilitating environmental specific information transfer.

Here we use zebrafish (D. rerio) to further explore the phenomenon of transgenerational acclimation of hypoxia in fishes. We focus on paternal exposure as we predict that environmental specific information can be transferred via sperm, as observed in other studies [4, 40, 65, 66]. We test whether paternal exposure to hypoxia stimulates phenotypic responses in offspring, using behavioral phenotyping to identify resistance to acute hypoxia (time to loss of equilibrium). We then use RNA-Seq to identify candidate genes that are differentially expressed in control and hypoxic progeny and whole genome bisulfite sequencing data to assess whether changes in DNA methylation underpin alterations in phenotype and gene expression (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental design. Groups of adult male zebrafish are maintained in normoxia (20–21 kPa, n = 20) or hypoxia (11–12 kPa, n = 20) for 14 days. Five males from each treatment were then used to create F1 progeny, crossing the males to unexposed females (n = 5 families/treatment), with half of the sperm used for whole genome bisulfite sequencing, to assess differential methylation (n = 3 per treatment). At 20–21 days post fertilization, offspring undergo acute hypoxia tolerance (6–8 offspring/family) assays and n = 3 offspring/treatment are used for differential gene expression analysis (RNA-Seq)

Full size image

Results

Hypoxia tolerance assays in unexposed offspring

Progeny of males exposed to moderate hypoxia for 14 days show a greater resistance to acute hypoxia than progeny of control males. Time to loss of equilibrium was, on average, 32 s longer for progeny of hypoxia exposed males (t = 2.52, p = 0.014; confidence interval (CI) = 7.38, 58.83; Fig. 2A) and the progeny of hypoxia exposed males lost equilibrium, on average, 9.18 times vs. 12.32 times in the control progeny (t = − 4.21, p <0.0001, CI = − 0.433, − 0.158; Fig. 2B). However, when accounting for family (to avoid pseudo-replication due to multiple offspring per family being tested), the effect of time to loss of equilibrium becomes non-significant (t = 1.67, p = 0.133, CI = − 12.66, 79.22; note this model accounts for observed heterogeneity in the data), though the effect remains for the number of times offspring lost equilibrium (z = − 2.46, p = 0.014, CI = − 0.567, − 0.037). Hence, there are strong family effects (time to loss of equilibrium Treatment ID variance = 42.38; loss of equilibrium frequency Treatment ID variance = 0.025), with greater resistance to acute hypoxia being observed for just two families, H1 and H2 (Fig. 2C, D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hypoxia tolerance assays of unexposed offspring of control vs. hypoxia treated males. A, C Time to first loss of equilibrium > 3 s, B, D loss of equilibrium frequency—C and D are broken down by family. N = 6-8 progeny/family × 5 families/treatment. Tolerance assays done at 20–21 days post fertilization, following 14 day parental exposures (20–21 kPa normoxia control vs. 11-–12 kPa hypoxia treatment). Boxes illustrate the interquartile range (medians, 25th and 75th percentiles), and whiskers illustrate 1.5 * the interquartile range, above and below the 75th and 25th percentiles. Statistical analysis: A p = 0.014, B p < 0.0001 treatment effects modeled using generalized linear models. C p = 0.133, D p = 0.014 treatment effects modeled using generalized linear mixed models with family ID included as a random effect

Full size image

Transcriptome wide gene expression patterns in unexposed offspring

We sequenced 17.4–20.0 million reads per sample. Mapping assigned 14.1–16.1 million reads to genes, representing 80.15–81.41% of reads uniquely assigned to a gene, with detected expression in 26,260 of the 32,057 genes in the GRCz11.99 annotation.

A total of 91 genes were significantly differentially expressed between the offspring of control and hypoxia exposed males (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Table S1). Of the 91 differentially expressed genes, 36 genes were significantly upregulated, and 55 were significantly downregulated in the offspring of hypoxia exposed males (Fig. 3). Eight genes exhibited greater than 4-fold change in differential expression (2 upregulated in hypoxia, 6 downregulated in hypoxia) (Fig. 4). Most notably, two hemoglobin genes (hbaa1 and hbz (si:ch211-5k11.6); Figs. 4 and 5A) were upregulated by more than 6-fold in offspring of hypoxia exposed F0 males. Three additional genes were upregulated by more than 4-fold, but did not pass false discovery rate (FDR) correction—these included a third hemoglobin gene (hbba1; Figs. 4 and 5A; Additional file 1: Table S1) and a major histocompatibility gene (mhc1ula; Fig. 4). Importantly, the observed upregulation in hemoglobin gene expression correlates with the differential family effects observed in our loss of equilibrium tolerance assays (compare Fig. 2 with Fig. 5A/Additional file 2: Table S2). Sequenced offspring from the H1 and H2 families, the two families that show the greatest tolerance to acute hypoxia, also shows the greatest upregulation in gene expression. Indeed, the sequenced H1 offspring never lost equilibrium within our 240s long assay and the sequenced H2 offspring first lost equilibrium at 216.5s, whereas the third hypoxia offspring, from family H3 (with a first loss of equilibrium at 181.5s), and the offspring from C1-C3 (first loss of equilibrium > 3 s at 38.8, 24.2 and 18.9s, respectively) show little to no expression at these hemoglobin genes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differential gene expression in offspring of control vs. hypoxia treated males. 91 genes are differentially expressed between the 20–21 day old offspring of hypoxia (n = 3) and control (n = 3) males, with an FDR < 0.05. Red and blue colors represent higher and lower expression, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Volcano plot for differentially expressed genes in the offspring of control vs. hypoxia exposed males. 20-21 day old zebrafish F1 offspring from control (n = 3) and hypoxia (n = 3) treated males, showing the distribution of significance [-log10(p-value)] vs. fold change [log2(fold change)] for all genes. Each circle represents a gene, with significant genes (at 5% FDR) highlighted in red. Genes with greater than 4-fold change in expression between control and hypoxia treatments are labeled

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Global methylation changes and relationship between methylation in the sperm of hypoxia vs. control parental males and gene expression in the F1 progeny. A Relationship between CpG methylation and RNA expression for Hb cluster and acot21. CG methylation track shows methylation levels for dinucleotides with >5 calls; CGIs were predicted according to the Gardiner-Garden and Frommer criteria (CGI G*) and CxxC affinity purification (CGI B*). No changes in TSS methylation containing CGIs (dashed box) were observed for both genes (bottom). B Violin plot showing distribution of methylation at transcription start sites (TSS) of differentially expressed genes in the F1 progeny. Downregulated genes are hypermethylated when compared to upregulated genes; however, no clear differences were observed between both conditions. C Violin plot showing distribution of methylation at TSS of genes classified into quartiles according to expression level (highest, 4). Each violin is scaled to the same maximum width (total area is not constant between violins) to demonstrate distributions for each quartile. Black dots denote the median

Full size image

Six genes were downregulated by more than 4-fold in offspring of hypoxia exposed males (Fig. 4), including timm23b (translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 23 homolog b (yeast)), acot21 (acyl-CoA thioesterase 21), znf1156 (zinc finger protein 1156), cyt1l (type I cytokeratin), irge1 (immunity-related GTP-ase), and zgc:158417. None of these downregulated genes appear to associate with hypoxia in any way, and hence, are not considered further.

Of the genes we analyzed, 13,698 were associated with a GO term (including 58 of the 91 differentially expressed genes). Nine GO terms were overrepresented in our differentially expressed genes at a q-value cutoff of 0.1 (Table 1). Several significantly enriched GO terms were associated with lytic or proteolytic activity (i.e., serine hydrolase activity, serine-type endopeptidase activity, hydrolase activity, serine-type peptidase activity, glutamate decarboxylase activity, endopeptidase activity, peptidase activity, peptidase activity, acting on L-amino acid peptides). Proteolysis (GO:0006508 p-value = 7.43 × 10−04; q-value = 0.7640) tended to be over-represented. Genes associated with the process of aging (GO:0007568; p-value = 1.99 × 10−05; q-value = 0.1640) as well as to the response to oxidative stress (GO:0006979; p-value = 9.20 × 10−04; q-value = 0.841) also tended to be over-represented.

Table 1 Gene Ontology analysis terms associated with differentially expressed genes. Only terms with a false discovery rate q-value below 0.1 are displayed
Full size table

The relationship between methylation in parental sperm and gene expression in offspring

To explore potential mechanistic explanations underlying increased tolerance to acute hypoxia and differential gene expression in the zebrafish offspring, we conducted whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of sperm from hypoxic (n = 3) and control males (n = 3). We obtained an average of 67,891,334 reads per methylome (SEM ± 2,551,964) and a mapping efficiency of 45.02% (SEM ± 0.07%). Global cytosine-guanine (CG) dinucleotide methylation levels showed no differences between hypoxia and control samples (84.15% and 84.23%, respectively; p > 0.05; Additional file 3: Table S3).

In jawed vertebrates, methylation of transcription start sites (TSS), and in particular regions enriched on CG dinucleotides (CGIs), is associated with transcriptional silencing [67]. For two example cases, the upregulated hemoglobin cluster and the downregulated acot21 gene, we characterized methylation at individual positions and CGI using statistical and experimental criteria [68, 69]. No differences in methylation levels were observed for these genes (Fig. 5A). Next, we explored methylation levels for all differentially expressed genes. Using a threshold of 20 methylation calls, we obtained 29 and 23 genes for the upregulated and downregulated groups. Whereas downregulated genes are hypermethylated and upregulated genes are hypomethylated for hypoxia and control samples, TSS methylation values remain stable when both groups of samples are compared (Fig. 5B). Finally, we explored the global effect of DNA methylation on gene expression using expression quantiles. We found methylation levels in the parental sperm and gene expression in the F1 offspring are coupled in hypoxia and control samples (Fig. 5C). Nevertheless, when we completed a differential methylation analysis of all genes, we found 420 significantly differentially methylation regions (226 hypermethylated and 194 hypomethylated) in response to low-oxygen treatment (Additional file 4: Table S4); however, these were not associated with corresponding alterations in gene expression in the offspring.

Discussion

We demonstrate that paternal exposure to hypoxia alters both the phenotypic response to hypoxia and gene expression in the offspring. Larvae of fathers that experienced moderate hypoxia-maintained equilibrium in acute hypoxia for longer than those of controls, indicating that paternal exposure stimulated a higher tolerance to hypoxic conditions. Using next-generation sequencing, we also detected significant changes in gene expression between control and hypoxia offspring, with two key hemoglobin genes upregulated in offspring of hypoxia exposed males—genes which may mediate the observed phenotypic differences, as they are involved in oxygen transport. This pattern of inheritance, through the paternal line, could have large evolutionary consequences as fathers are able to pass down valuable information to offspring that may enable better survival. However, the underlying mechanism for this transmission remains unknown, as we did not detect any differential methylation in the sperm of parental males at any of the differentially expressed genes. Importantly, our study provides evidence of increased tolerance to acute hypoxia through paternal exposure, thus, adding to increasing evidence that environmental challenges experienced by ancestors can provide progeny with environmental specific information that might allow future generations to survive the same environmental challenge, i.e., transgenerational plasticity [16, 17, 23, 27, 29,30,31, 33], though see [70] for an amphipod study that did not find evidence for transgenerational plasticity to hypoxia.

In a previous zebrafish study, 20 dpf larvae exposed to 4 kPa pO2 revealed that offspring of parents exposed to hypoxia had longer time to loss of equilibrium (hypoxia resistance [25];). In preliminary trials, we found no behavioral differences using these oxygen parameters; thus, we increased the magnitude of hypoxia, exposing larvae to ~1 kPa, which produced the expected phenotypic differences. Importantly, the previous study [25] did not differentiate between maternal and paternal effects and did not provide a possible mechanism underlying this phenotypic effect.

It is important to note that our study detects intergenerational acclimation, with potential for transgenerational acclimation. A transgenerational study requires rearing fish through to create an F2 generation. Indeed, few studies that claim transgenerational acclimation are truly transgenerational, as the studies are conducted across a single generation [3]. Even if parents are exposed to environmental challenges prior to maturity, the primordial germ cells are still exposed to the challenge as well. Regardless, our results suggest that parents are passing on environmental specific information that may benefit offspring survival, thus facilitating acclimation to environmental conditions. Additional research is needed to investigate whether the offspring of hypoxia exposed parents also exhibit any changes in gill morphology, metabolic or cardiac function or behavioral responses, like surface respiration, to hypoxia, as observed in adult fishes exposed to hypoxia [51].

To try and understand the underlying mechanism priming progeny to better cope with hypoxic conditions, we conducted transcriptomic analysis of the progeny. We detected 91 genes that were differentially expressed in the offspring of paternal males that were exposed to moderate hypoxia for 2 weeks. Most notably, two hemoglobin genes (hbaa1 and hbz) exhibited over 6-fold differential expression, were upregulated in offspring of males exposed to hypoxia, with another hemoglobin gene, hbba1, also upregulated, though non-significantly. Remarkably, sequenced offspring from the H1 and H2 families, the two families that show the greatest tolerance to acute hypoxia also show the greatest upregulation in hemoglobin gene expression (Additional file 2: Table S2). hbaa1, hbz, and hbba1 are all found on chromosome 3, are part of the major hemoglobin enhancer locus responsible for heme binding, and are instrumental in oxygen transport [71]. Exposing fish to hypoxia is typically considered to improve hypoxia tolerance through alterations in hemoglobin, hemoglobin-O2 binding affinities, or cardiac function to improve low O2 performance [59]. Thus, differential expression of hemoglobin genes (upregulated in offspring from hypoxia exposed fathers) could indicate altered physiological mechanisms to combat low oxygen, which could be precipitating the increased tolerance to acute hypoxia in the H1 and H2 families.

The relationship between hypoxia and hemoglobin function has been studied in larval zebrafish, suggesting that zebrafish larvae might be able to upregulate hemoglobin concentration in response to chronic hypoxia [72]. Under normoxic conditions, oxygen supply via diffusion seems to be sufficient to meet metabolic demands up to 12-14 dpf in zebrafish, but larvae appear to be able to use a circulatory system as a backup where necessary [72]. Further, impaired hemoglobin function does not impair routine oxygen usage in normoxia or at moderate levels of hypoxia in 5-42 dpf larvae, but functional hemoglobin does allow larvae to sequester extra oxygen from water in extreme hypoxic conditions [73]. The upregulated hemoglobin genes identified in this study are adult hemoglobins—larvae express embryonic/larval globins early in development, but somewhere between days 16 and 22, the embryonic/larval globins begin to decline [71, 74], and adult globin expression increases, with the adult globin expression pattern nearly completely established by day 32dpf. hbae5 (ENSDARG00000045142) is the only embryonic/larval hemoglobin to show any pattern of differential expression in our transcriptomic data. We found that this gene was highly expressed and upregulated twice as much in our hypoxia offspring than in our control, though not significantly differentiated after FDR correction (p = 0.014, q = 0.391). hbae5 expression appears to peak around 22 dpf [71], so upregulation of this gene should result in higher affinity for oxygen, which may help explain the increased tolerance to the acute hypoxia that we observed in our 20–21 dpf progeny. hbae5 has also been shown to be upregulated more than 5-fold by hypoxia in zebrafish larvae directly exposed to hypoxia; ([41]; note that hbae5 is called hbz in their study).

In addition to two genes upregulated over 6-fold in offspring of hypoxia exposed males, six genes were downregulated by 4-fold as well. These include timm23b (translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 23 homolog b (yeast)), an integral component of membranes. Gene acot21 (acyl-CoA thioesterase 12), is a key component of acyl-CoA metabolic processes with thiolester hydrolase activity and found in the cytoplasm. Gene znf1156 (zinc finger protein 1156) has metal ion binding functions. Gene zgc:158417 and irge1 (immunity-related GTP-ase family) are predicted to be integral component of membranes and used in GTP binding. Gene cyt1l (type I cytokeratin) is predicted to have structural molecule activity. Little information on these genes is available, and it is not clear how they link with hypoxia in anyway. Expression changes of such significant magnitude are likely to have large consequences, so some additional research around hypoxia and gene function is needed.

An HRGFish database [75] reports 50 key genes that are altered through hypoxia, but we did not find any of them to be differentially expressed in our transcriptomic data (Additional file 1: Table S1, showing data for 46 of the 50 HRGFish genes referenced for the zebrafish), suggesting that the genes that are altered by direct exposure to hypoxia may be different to those that may be passed on to future generations of hypoxia exposed ancestors. Importantly, transcriptomic studies of F1 and F2 adult tissues, like heart, gill, brain and liver, might reveal differential expression of some of these key hypoxia genes.

Interestingly, our GO analysis highlighted an overrepresentation of genes associated with aging and oxidative stress. Studies have previously hypothesized a link between hypoxia (and effects on respiration), oxidative stress (free radical production) and aging in humans, with several studies demonstrating age-related changes in the hypoxia inducible factor system [76, 77].

DNA methylation is known to be altered by hypoxia exposure in fishes [40, 49] and other vertebrates [78, 79]. Thus, we hypothesized that hypoxia might produce changes in the paternal methylome, which are inherited to the offspring, explaining the observed tolerance to acute hypoxia and differential gene expression. Interesting, we found methylation levels and gene expression were coupled in our hypoxia and control samples, despite the different tissues of origin for the methylome and RNA expression data. This coupling supports a common pattern between the paternal methylome and expression levels of the embryo. Yet, we observed no differences in methylation levels in any differentially expressed genes, including the hemoglobin cluster, suggesting that sperm methylation patterns are not responsible for changes in the observed changes in gene expression in our study, or perhaps through epigenetic control away from the focal genes. The medaka studies [40, 49] exposed fish to a similar level of hypoxia, but for a much longer period, the entire 3-month life cycle, which may explain why they observed differential methylation in the sperm and we did not. If alterations to DNA methylation are not responsible for the changes in gene expression observed in our study, then perhaps histone modifications or miRNAs are at play. miRNA in medaka have also been identified as a potential underlying mechanism of transgenerational testis impairment induced by hypoxia by targeting genes associated with stress responses, cell cycle, epigenetic modifications, sugar metabolism, and cell motion [80].

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that paternal exposure to hypoxia is able to endow offspring with a higher resistance to hypoxic conditions and that upregulation of genes at the hemoglobin gene enhancer locus on chromosome 3 may explain these phenotypic effects. This study is the first to demonstrate that paternal exposure alone can mediate these changes in phenotype and gene expression in response to hypoxia. These findings suggest that paternal inheritance may be providing offspring with valuable environmental specific information (an epigenetic memory [81]) about a hypoxic environment that could increase their survival, though it is unclear how this information is transmitted as we did not detect any differential methylation in the sperm of control and hypoxia treated males. Regardless, the variability in tolerance to acute hypoxia that we observed between hypoxia families suggests that progeny of different genotypes respond to hypoxia in different ways, phenotypically (i.e., an epigenotype x environment interaction). In other words, environmental specific information is transferred through some genotypes, but not others, suggesting that pre-acclimation to hypoxic conditions may be driven by an interaction between the genotype, the epigenotype and the environment.

Methods

Fish husbandry

Breeding and husbandry took place within the Otago Zebrafish Facility (OZF), a temperature-controlled facility maintained at 25–27 °C, pH 7–7.8, and conductivity 300–500 μS. Fish were maintained in a Tecniplast re-circulating system (Tecniplast, Varese, Italy) under a 14:10 light to dark photoperiodic cycle, with 30 min of simulated dawn and dusk at the start and end of each day. Acute hypoxia assays took place in the Zoology Department, where room temperature was controlled at 25 °C, with a 13.5-h (0700–2030 h) light cycle with 30 min of simulated dawn and dusk. Zebrafish were fed twice daily with dry food (ZM000-400, size-dependent) and once daily with live rotifer (Brachionus spp. days 5-10 post fertilization) or artemia (Artemia salina; days 10+ post fertilization). All animals were collected and maintained according to the standards of the Animal Ethics Committee for the University of Otago, New Zealand (protocol no. AEC 44/16).

Hypoxia exposure

In November 2016, 9-month-old male zebrafish (AB wild-type; n = 20/treatment) were exposed to hypoxic conditions (10.91–12.33 kPa pO2) or control conditions (20–21 kPa), for 2 weeks, in line with Ho and Burrgren (2012). Two glass tanks (36Wx29Lx26.5H cm) were separated into three zones (12 × 29 cm), with 10 fish in each outer compartment (n = 20 per treatment) and two fine bubble diffusers and a filter positioned in the middle compartment. The oxygen concentration of the treatment tank was maintained by using an OxyGuard Mini probe (OxyGuard International, Denmark) and oxygen controller (Model PR5714, PR Electronics, Denmark) that were connected to nitrogen and air cylinders (BOC Gas Supplies, Food Fresh grade). An on/off relay output from the controller actuated a solenoid-controlled flow of compressed nitrogen or compressed air (BOC Gas Supplies, New Zealand), to maintain the system at 53.1–60% air saturation (= 10.91–12.33 kPa or 4.38-4.95 mg/L) level [59]. Normoxic conditions in the control tank (> 95% saturation) were maintained by continually passing air through the bubble diffusers, connected to an air pump. The oxygen concentration in the tanks was confirmed with a YSI 85 probe (YSI, Inc., Ohio, USA). Both tanks were siphoned for waste and received 10% water changes every 3 days. Calibration of the oxygen probe was checked daily and recalibrated as necessary. There was no mortality in either control or the hypoxia treatment.

F1 families, hypoxia tolerance assays, and analysis

Progeny from five families per treatment (n = 5 hypoxia, n = 5 control) were generated using a modified in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocol [65, 82] 7 days after parental exposure finished (note that we generated IVF families on day 1 after exposure as well, but there was a technical issue with the sperm samples for downstream analyses). Briefly, eggs and sperm were collected using abdominal massage of females and males that were anesthetized by immersion in 0.01% Tricaine methanosulfonate—half the sperm (0.5–2 μL/male) was used for IVF, and the other half was stored for subsequent DNA extraction. One male and one female were used to create each F1 family.

Offspring were reared to 20–21 dpf when n = 8 offspring per family (except family C5, where n = 6; total n = 77) were challenged by acute hypoxia assays in small acrylic chambers (100 mm H × 50 mm × 50 mm). The 20–21 dpf was chosen as the larvae were then large enough to be reliably tracked with automated tracking software (see below), rather than timing manually by eye. Automated tracking increases repeatability and reduces observer bias. For the acute hypoxia assay, a 0–1 kPa oxygen level was achieved by continually passing compressed nitrogen through a bubble diffuser for at least 10 minutes before assays and continuously passing the nitrogen through a valve in the top of the chambers during the assay. The oxygen concentration fluctuated between 0 and 1%, monitored using a fiber-optic oxygen probe (Foxy OR-125) attached to an Ocean Optics® USB 2000 spectrophotometer with USB-LS-450 light source and the manufacturer’s software (OOI Sensors). Each fish was filmed for 240 s and recorded with a GoPro Hero 3+ camera. A total of 77 videos (n = 37 control, n = 40 hypoxia) were tracked using EthoVision XT behavioral tracking software, version 11.5 (Noldus Information Technology, Netherlands). Fish were then immediately euthanized by submersion in ice and stored in RNAlater (Invitrogen). One offspring from family C1 stayed at the bottom the entire assay, so this individual was removed from further analyses.

Resistance to acute hypoxia, defined as the first time that progeny lost equilibrium for 3 seconds or more during hypoxia assays [25], and the loss of equilibrium frequency were analyzed using R v. 3.5.1 [83]. Loss of equilibrium > 3 s was initially modeled using a Gaussian generalized linear model, and loss of equilibrium frequency as a Poisson generalized linear model, with treatment (control vs. hypoxia) as a fixed effect. To account for multiple fry per family being tested, we also ran the models incorporating treatment ID family as a random effect, using a Gaussian linear mixed effects model for time to loss of equilibrium > 3 s and a Poisson linear mixed effects model for the loss of equilibrium frequency. Significant heterogeneity was obvious in the time to loss of equilibrium, so a linear mixed model incorporating heteroscedasticity was compared to the model assuming homogeneity, by incorporating the variance in Treatment into the model [84]. Offspring from families H1-H3 and C1-C3 were chosen for further analyses—H1 and H2 were chosen as they showed the greatest phenotypic effect and all other families were chosen at random.

RNA-Seq library preparation and analysis

Total RNA from six whole 20–21 dpf offspring (3 control offspring, 3 treatment offspring) was extracted using a Zymo Duet extraction kit (Zymo, NZ). The integrity of RNA samples was determined using an Agilent RNA 6000 Nano chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer to check that the samples had an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value of 8–9. Total RNA concentration was measured by Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit, Life Technologies). Samples were sent to the Otago Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility at the University of Otago, under contract to New Zealand Genomics Limited, for library construction and RNA sequencing. Messenger RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample preparation kit (Illumina), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina, USA) machine with single-ended 100-bp reads generating 17.4–20.0 million reads per sample.

Low quality reads and remaining adapters were trimmed using Trim Galore v0.6.4 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) in a two-step process. First, sequencing adaptors were removed, 10 bp were hard-trimmed from the 5′ end to account for sequence bias produced by PBAT library preparation, and last, low-quality ends from reads (PHRED score < 20) were removed [85]. The reads were then aligned to the zebrafish genome (GCRz11) using HISAT2 v2.2.0 [86], informed with the GCRz11.99 annotation. Expression was summarized sample by sample at the gene level using featureCounts v2.0.0 [87]. The analysis of differential expression was conducted in R v.3.5.0 [83] using the DESeq2 package v1.24.0 [88] without the independent filtering option implemented in the “Results” function (see https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6879699). Differentially expressed genes between offspring of fathers exposed to hypoxia and controls were extracted after correcting for multiple testing using False Discovery Rate cut-off of q = 0.05 [89]. In order to test for over/under-representation of biological pathways which differentially expressed genes are involved, enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) analysis terms was performed using Gorilla online accessed on August 4 2020 [90].

Whole genome bisulfite sequencing and analysis

DNA from six parental sperm samples (parental sperm of H1, H2, H4, C3, C4, C5 F1 families—note that only H1, H2, and C3 match the RNASeq samples, as there were some technical issues with library prep) was purified using a modified magnetic bead method [91]. WGBS was undertaken using an adapted modified post-bisulfite adaptor tagging (PBAT) method [67, 92]. Briefly, bisulfite treatment was performed according to the EZ Methylation Direct Mag Prep kit (Zymo, D5044) instruction manual. Bisulfite treatment was performed before adaptor tagging, enabling simultaneous conversion of unmethylated cytosines, DNA fragmentation, and improving library preparation efficiency. Sequencing primers were added using random heptamer primers, and finally, sample-specific indexes and sequences required for Illumina flow cell binding were added by PCR. Library integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and a fragment analyzer (Agilent) and sequenced on eight lanes (one flow cell) of an Illumina HiSeq using HiSeq2500 V4 sequencing of 100 bp single ended reads (in combination with 13 other samples, which were part of another study).

Raw reads were trimmed in Trim Galore v0.6.4 as previously mentioned. Read mapping was performed using Bismark v0.22.3 [93] with the option --pbat specified. Zebrafish genome version 11 (GRCz11) was used as reference. BAM files were deduplicated and reports containing methylation base calls were generated using the deduplicate_bismark and bismark_methylation_extractor scripts, respectively. The non-conversion rate during the bisulfite treatment was evaluated by calculating the proportion of non-CG methylation; by this measure, all libraries must have had a bisulfite conversion efficiency of at least 98.5% (Additional file 3: Table S3).

CG methylation calls were analyzed in SeqMonk v1.47.0 (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk). To analyze methylation at gene level, probes with a minimum of 5 methylation calls were generated and the percentage methylation measured as number of methylated calls/total calls (mean CpG call depth ranged from 1.68–2.06 across the 6 samples). CpG islands (CGIs) were identified using Gardiner-Garden & Frommer’s criteria and previously published datasets. For the former, 200-bp windows moving at 1-bp intervals were considered CGIs if the Obs/Exp value was greater than 0.6 and a GC content greater than 50%. For the latter, data obtained by biotinylated CxxC affinity purification (Bio-CAP) and massive parallel sequencing was used to identify non-methylated CpG islands [69]. Mean CpG depth at CpG islands ranged from 1.74-2.22 across the 6 samples.

Coupling between methylation and gene expression in differentially expressed genes (DEG) and at genome level was interrogated using methylation levels at transcription start sites (TSS). TSS were defined as 200 bp centered on the first nucleotide of an annotated mRNA, and a threshold of at least 20 methylation calls to be included in the analysis (mean TSS quantification ranged from 3.53 to 4.39 across the 6 samples). DEG were divided into underexpressed and overexpressed, whereas coupling at genome level was assessed dividing gene expression levels into quartiles. Custom annotation tracks were generated using Gviz v1.28.3 [94].

Finally, a conventional differential methylation analysis using the DMLtest function of the DSS package [95]. Briefly, DMR were identified by contrasting control and hypoxia samples using the DMLtest and callDMR functions in the DSS package, with the following parameters: smoothing = TRUE, smoothing.span = 500, minimum length DMR = 50 bps, minimum number of CpG sites = 5, delta DMR = 0 and p.threshold DMR = 1e−5. DMRs were annotated with the closest gene (threshold 2000 bp) using SeqMonk.

Availability of data and materials

The accession number for the RNA-Seq and WGBS datasets reported in this paper is GEO:GSE160662 [96]. The phenotypic data can be found at https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/xpy8j [97]. The source code for the bioinformatic analysis is publicly available on GitHub https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6879699.

References

  1. Salinas S, Brown SC, Mangel M, Munch S. Non-genetic inheritance and changing environments. Non-Genet Inherit. 2013;1:38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohacek J, Mansuy IM. Molecular insights into transgenerational non-genetic inheritance of acquired behaviours. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:641.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Dea RE, Noble DWA, Johnson SL, Hesselson D, Nakagawa S. The role of non-genetic inheritance in evolutionary rescue: epigenetic buffering, heritable bet hedging and epigenetic traps. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2:dvv014.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dias BG, Ressler KJ. Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nat Neurosci. 2013;17:89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gapp K, Jawaid A, Sarkies P, Bohacek J, Pelczar P, Prados J, et al. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:667.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Radford EJ, Ito M, Shi H, Corish JA, Yamazawa K, Isganaitis E, et al. In utero effects. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism. Science. 2014;345:1255903.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton T, Metcalfe NB. Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014;281:20140311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonduriansky R. Rethinking heredity, again. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27:330–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonduriansky R, Day T. Nongenetic inheritance and its evolutionary implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;40:103–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Auge G, Leverett LD, Edwards B, Donohue K. Adjusting phenotypes via within- and across-generational plasticity. New Phytol. 2017;216(2):343–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1094–103.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jablonka E, Raz G. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol. 2009;84:131–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emborski C, Mikheyev AS. Ancestral diet transgenerationally influences offspring in a parent-of-origin and sex-specific manner. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019;374:20180181.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akhter A, Rahaman M, Suzuki R, Murono Y, Tokumoto T. Next-generation and further transgenerational effects of bisphenol A on zebrafish reproductive tissues. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00788.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogt G. Facilitation of environmental adaptation and evolution by epigenetic phenotype variation: insights from clonal, invasive, polyploid, and domesticated animals. Environ Epigenet. 2017;3:dvx002.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marshall DJ. Transgenerational plasticity in the sea: context-dependent maternal effects across the life history. Ecology. 2008;89:418–27.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herman J, Sultan S. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in plants: case studies, mechanisms, and implications for natural populations. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2:102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox RJ, Donelson JM, Schunter C, Ravasi T, Gaitán-Espitia JD. Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019;374:20180174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kishimoto S, Uno M, Okabe E, Nono M, Nishida E. Environmental stresses induce transgenerationally inheritable survival advantages via germline-to-soma communication in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14031.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weyrich A, Lenz D, Fickel J. Environmental change-dependent inherited epigenetic response. Genes. 2018;10:4.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allan BJM, Miller GM, McCormick MI, Domenici P, Munday PL. Parental effects improve escape performance of juvenile reef fish in a high-CO2 world. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014;281:20132179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shi D, Zhao C, Chen Y, Ding J, Zhang L, Chang Y. Transcriptomes shed light on transgenerational and developmental effects of ocean warming on embryos of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7931.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YH, Jeong C-B, Wang M, Hagiwara A, Lee J-S. Transgenerational acclimation to changes in ocean acidification in marine invertebrates. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;153:111006.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maboloc EA, Chan KYK. Parental whole life cycle exposure modulates progeny responses to ocean acidification in slipper limpets. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27:3272–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho DH, Burggren WW. Parental hypoxic exposure confers offspring hypoxia resistance in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Exp Biol. 2012;215:4208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heckwolf MJ, Meyer BS, Häsler R, Höppner MP, Eizaguirre C, Reusch TBH. Two different epigenetic information channels in wild three-spined sticklebacks are involved in salinity adaptation. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaaz1138.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heckwolf MJ, Meyer BS, Döring T, Eizaguirre C, Reusch TBH. Transgenerational plasticity and selection shape the adaptive potential of sticklebacks to salinity change. Evol Appl. 2018;11:1873–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffiths JS, Johnson KM, Sirovy KA, Yeats MS, Pan FTC, La Peyre JF, et al. Transgenerational plasticity and the capacity to adapt to low salinity in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021;288:20203118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Donelson JM, McCormick MI, Booth DJ, Munday PL. Reproductive acclimation to increased water temperature in a tropical reef fish. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97223.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Donelson JM, Munday PL, McCormick MI, Pitcher CR. Rapid transgenerational acclimation of a tropical reef fish to climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2012;2:30–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Veilleux HD, Ryu T, Donelson JM, van Herwerden L, Seridi L, Ghosheh Y, et al. Molecular processes of transgenerational acclimation to a warming ocean. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:1074.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salinas S, Munch SB. Thermal legacies: transgenerational effects of temperature on growth in a vertebrate. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:159–63.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryu T, Veilleux HD, Donelson JM, Munday PL, Ravasi T. The epigenetic landscape of transgenerational acclimation to ocean warming. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8:504–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rivera HE, Chen C-Y, Gibson MC, Tarrant AM. Plasticity in parental effects confers rapid larval thermal tolerance in the estuarine anemone Nematostella vectensis. J Exp Biol. 2021;224:jeb236745.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bernal MA, Donelson JM, Veilleux HD, Ryu T, Munday PL, Ravasi T. Phenotypic and molecular consequences of stepwise temperature increase across generations in a coral reef fish. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:4516–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guillaume AS, Monro K, Marshall DJ. Transgenerational plasticity and environmental stress: do paternal effects act as a conduit or a buffer? Funct Ecol. 2016;30:1175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rutkowska J, Lagisz M, Bonduriansky R, Nakagawa S. Mapping the past, present and future research landscape of paternal effects. BMC Biol. 2020;18:183.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Strader ME, Wong JM, Kozal LC, Leach TS, Hofmann GE. Parental environments alter DNA methylation in offspring of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2019;517:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science. 2008;321:926.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang SY, Lau K, Lai K-P, Zhang J-W, Tse AC-K, Li J-W, et al. Hypoxia causes transgenerational impairments in reproduction of fish. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12114.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Long Y, Yan J, Song G, Li X, Li X, Li Q, et al. Transcriptional events co-regulated by hypoxia and cold stresses in zebrafish larvae. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:385.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Saxena DK. Effect of hypoxia by intermittent altitude exposure on semen characteristics and testicular morphology of male rhesus monkeys. Int J Biometeorol. 1995;38:137–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Okumura A, Fuse H, Kawauchi Y, Mizuno I, Akashi T. Changes in male reproductive function after high altitude mountaineering. High Alt Med Biol. 2003;4:349–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu RSS, Zhou BS, Randall DJ, Woo NYS, Lam PKS. Aquatic hypoxia is an endocrine disruptor and impairs fish reproduction. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:1137–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roesner A, Hankeln T, Burmester T. Hypoxia induces a complex response of globin expression in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2129.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jenny J-P, Francus P, Normandeau A, Lapointe F, Perga M-E, Ojala A, et al. Global spread of hypoxia in freshwater ecosystems during the last three centuries is caused by rising local human pressure. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22:1481–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu RSS. Hypoxia: from molecular responses to ecosystem responses. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002;45:35–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Townhill BL, Pinnegar JK, Righton DA, Metcalfe JD. Fisheries, low oxygen and climate change: how much do we really know? J Fish Biol. 2017;90:723–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lai KP, Wang SY, Li JW, Tong Y, Chan TF, Jin N, et al. Hypoxia causes transgenerational impairment of ovarian development and hatching success in fish. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53:3917–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nikinmaa M. Oxygen-dependent cellular functions—why fishes and their aquatic environment are a prime choice of study. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002;133:1–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Richards JG. Physiological, behavioral and biochemical adaptations of intertidal fishes to hypoxia. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:191.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Alexander TJ, Vonlanthen P, Seehausen O. Does eutrophication-driven evolution change aquatic ecosystems? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017;372:20160041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jaspers RT, Testerink J, Della Gaspera B, Chanoine C, Bagowski CP, van der Laarse WJ. Increased oxidative metabolism and myoglobin expression in zebrafish muscle during chronic hypoxia. Biol Open. 2014;3:718–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tzaneva V, Bailey S, Perry SF. The interactive effects of hypoxemia, hyperoxia, and temperature on the gill morphology of goldfish (Carassius auratus). Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2011;300:R1344–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dhillon RS, Yao L, Matey V, Chen B-J, Zhang A-J, Cao Z-D, et al. Interspecific differences in hypoxia-induced gill remodeling in carp. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2013;86:727–39.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pelster B. Developmental plasticity in the cardiovascular system of fish, with special reference to the zebrafish. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002;133:547–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. van der Meer DLM, van den Thillart GEEJM, Witte F, de Bakker MAG, Besser J, Richardson MK, et al. Gene expression profiling of the long-term adaptive response to hypoxia in the gills of adult zebrafish. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289:R1512–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gilmore KL, Doubleday ZA, Gillanders BM. Prolonged exposure to low oxygen improves hypoxia tolerance in a freshwater fish. Conserv Physiol. 2020;7:coz058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cook DG, Iftikar FI, Baker DW, Hickey AJR, Herbert NA. Low-O2 acclimation shifts the hypoxia avoidance behaviour of snapper (Pagrus auratus) with only subtle changes in aerobic and anaerobic function. J Exp Biol. 2013;216:369.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Carvan MJ III, Kalluvila TA, Klingler RH, Larson JK, Pickens M, Mora-Zamorano FX, et al. Mercury-induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of abnormal neurobehavior is correlated with sperm epimutations in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176155.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Potok ME, Nix DA, Parnell TJ, Cairns BR. Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization to match the paternal methylation pattern. Cell. 2013;153:759–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jiang L, Zhang J, Wang J-J, Wang L, Zhang L, Li G, et al. Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos. Cell. 2013;153:773–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ortega-Recalde O, Day RC, Gemmell NJ, Hore TA. Zebrafish preserve global germline DNA methylation while sex-linked rDNA is amplified and demethylated during feminisation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3053.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Skvortsova K, Tarbashevich K, Stehling M, Lister R, Irimia M, Raz E, et al. Retention of paternal DNA methylome in the developing zebrafish germline. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3054.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lamb SD, Chia JHZ, Johnson SL. Paternal exposure to a common herbicide alters the behavior and serotonergic system of zebrafish offspring. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0228357.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ci W, Liu J. Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in vertebrates. Physiology. 2015;30:63–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Peat JR, Dean W, Clark SJ, Krueger F, Smallwood SA, Ficz G, et al. Genome-wide bisulfite sequencing in zygotes identifies demethylation targets and maps the contribution of TET3 oxidation. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1990–2000.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG Islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol. 1987;196:261–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Long HK, Sims D, Heger A, Blackledge NP, Kutter C, Wright ML, et al. Epigenetic conservation at gene regulatory elements revealed by non-methylated DNA profiling in seven vertebrates. eLife. 2013;2:e00348.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Truebano M, Tills O, Collins M, Clarke C, Shipsides E, Wheatley C, et al. Short-term acclimation in adults does not predict offspring acclimation potential to hypoxia. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3174.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ganis JJ, Hsia N, Trompouki E, de Jong JLO, DiBiase A, Lambert JS, et al. Zebrafish globin switching occurs in two developmental stages and is controlled by the LCR. Dev Biol. 2012;366:185–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Schwerte T, Überbacher D, Pelster B. Non-invasive imaging of blood cell concentration and blood distribution in zebrafish (Danio rerio) incubated in hypoxic conditions in vivo. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:1299.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rombough P, Drader H. Hemoglobin enhances oxygen uptake in larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) but only under conditions of extreme hypoxia. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:778.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Tiedke J, Gerlach F, Mitz SA, Hankeln T, Burmester T. Ontogeny of globin expression in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Physiol B. 2011;181:1011–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Rashid I, Nagpure NS, Srivastava P, Kumar R, Pathak AK, Singh M, et al. HRGFish: a database of hypoxia responsive genes in fishes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42346.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Valli A, Harris AL, Kessler BM. Hypoxia metabolism in ageing. Aging. 2015;7:465–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Katschinski DM. Is there a molecular connection between hypoxia and aging? Exp Gerontol. 2006;45:482–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang Y, Gou W, Ma J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhang H. Genome methylation and regulatory functions for hypoxic adaptation in Tibetan chicken embryos. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3891.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Childebayeva A, Harman T, Weinstein J, Goodrich JM, Dolinoy DC, Day TA, et al. DNA methylation changes are associated with an incremental ascent to high altitude. Front Genet. 2019;10:1062.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tse AC-K, Li J-W, Wang SY, Chan T-F, Lai KP, Wu RS-S. Hypoxia alters testicular functions of marine medaka through microRNAs regulation. Aquat Toxicol. 2016;180:266–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. D’Urso A, Brickner JH. Mechanisms of epigenetic memory. Trends Genet. 2014;30:230–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Johnson SL, Zellhuber-McMillan S, Gillum J, Dunleavy J, Evans JP, Nakagawa S, et al. Evidence that fertility trades off with early offspring fitness as males age. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2018;285:20172174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S. Neglected biological patterns in the residuals: A behavioural ecologist’s guide to co-operating with heteroscedasticity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:2361–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2014;30:923–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Peat J, Ortega-Recalde O, Kardailsky O, Hore T. The elephant shark methylome reveals conservation of epigenetic regulation across jawed vertebrates. F1000Res. 2017;6:526.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Miura F, Enomoto Y, Dairiki R, Ito T. Amplification-free whole-genome bisulfite sequencing by post-bisulfite adaptor tagging. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e136.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1571–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Hahne F, Ivanek R. Visualizing Genomic Data Using Gviz and Bioconductor. In: Mathé E, Davis S, editors. Statistical Genomics: Methods and Protocols. New York: Springer New York; 2016. p. 335–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  95. Feng H, Conneely KN, Wu H. A Bayesian hierarchical model to detect differentially methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Johnson SL, Hore TA, Ragsdale A, Dutoit L, Ortega-Recalde O. Paternal hypoxia exposure primes offspring for increased hypoxia resistance. Gene Expression Omnibus. 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160662

    Google Scholar 

  97. Johnson SL, Ragsdale A, Nakagawa S. Paternal hypoxia exposure primes offspring for increased hypoxia resistance. Open Science Framework; 2020. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/xpy8j.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Denham Cook for advice on designing our hypoxia system, Murray McKenzie for construction of the hypoxia system, and Sean Divers for help with set up and construction of the acute hypoxia assay chambers. Greg Gimenez provided advice on RNASeq analyses, and Noel Jhinku and other members of the Otago Zebrafish Facility assisted with fish husbandry.

Funding

This work was supported by a Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund grant (UOO1507) and a University of Otago Research Grant to S.L.J. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Alexandria Ragsdale, Oscar Ortega-Recalde, and Ludovic Dutoit contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Alexandria Ragsdale, Ludovic Dutoit, Anne A. Besson, Jolyn H. Z. Chia, Tania King & Sheri L. Johnson

  2. Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Oscar Ortega-Recalde, Neil J. Gemmell & Timothy Hore

  3. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Shinichi Nakagawa

  4. School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Anthony Hickey

Authors
  1. Alexandria Ragsdale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oscar Ortega-Recalde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ludovic Dutoit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne A. Besson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jolyn H. Z. Chia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tania King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinichi Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anthony Hickey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Neil J. Gemmell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Timothy Hore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sheri L. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.L.J., T.H., and N.G. conceived the study. A.R., A.B., J.C., and T.K. collected the data. A.R., S.L.J., O.O., and L.D. performed the analyses, with assistance from S.N. A.R. and S.L.J led the writing of the manuscript, with assistance from O.O. and L.D. for bioinformatics aspects, and T.H., N.G., A.H., S.N., T.K. and A.B. contributed to revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheri L. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animals were collected and maintained according to the standards of the Animal Ethics Committee for the University of Otago, New Zealand (protocol no. AEC 44/16). Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Results of differential gene expression analysis.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Read counts mapping to four hemoglobin genes.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Whole genome bisulfite sequencing summary data.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Genomic position and annotations of hypoxia-induced differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in zebrafish sperm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ragsdale, A., Ortega-Recalde, O., Dutoit, L. et al. Paternal hypoxia exposure primes offspring for increased hypoxia resistance. BMC Biol 20, 185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01389-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01389-x

Keywords

  • Transgenerational plasticity
  • Transgenerational acclimation
  • Intergenerational
  • Cross-generational
  • Epigenetic
  • DNA methylation
  • Transcriptomics
  • Zebrafish
  • Danio rerio

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us