Skip to main content

Response to “Assessing the role of Piscine orthoreovirus in disease and the associated risk for wild Pacific salmon”

A Commentary to this article was published on 23 May 2023

A Correspondence to this article was published on 19 May 2023

The Original Article was published on 13 July 2021

We thank Mordecai et al. [1] for their interest in our work [2] and for their acknowledgment of its comprehensive nature. Indeed, this is the first examination of so many respiratory parameters to test functional impacts of a fish virus. All the same, the large number of parameters measured in our study enables diversity for conducting statistical analyses and we appreciate alternative statistical perspectives.

We feel it important, however, that offered perspectives have fundamental groundings in functional importance and the inherent biological variability associated with measuring respiratory parameters. Equally important is a recognition that the respiratory and oxygen transport indices in our dataset are measures of an integrated and complex biological system for which redundancies are expected as is the case for most physiological systems. Thus, statistical analyses and conclusions/perspectives focusing on variations of isolated parameters — for which Mordecai et al. suggest we have overlooked regarding PRV — ignores the holistic and allostatic nature of the vertebrate respiratory system. More seriously, it runs the risk of defining “harm” or “disease” in association with changes that may not ultimately affect organism functioning.

A good example of isolated-metric variation was for EPOC (the oxygen used during recovery from exhaustion), which Mordecai et al. singled out because EPOC was statistically reduced at a single time point (1 Wpc) following PRV injection. Missing from this overly focused analysis is a crucial fact: control EPOC has a very large 95%CI (over a 2-fold range; Fig. S1 [2]) because EPOC is innately variable. Spontaneous activity sometimes manifests during the recovery process of salmon irrespective of experimental manipulations. It is therefore important to also consider maximum aerobic capabilities, which were virtually identical between treatments in this instance (ṀO2max was numerically highest at 1 Wpc in PRV fish, a potential benefit!). Thus, aerobic capacities during exhaustive exercise were uncompromised by PRV while the oxygen used during recovery was putatively reduced. A true suppression of EPOC would most likely require a depletion of muscle glycogen stores, which we did not measure. Without this information, we could speculate, but did not, that PRV fish were simply a calmer cohort than the control fish during recovery, thereby reducing variance towards high EPOC values. We therefore disagree with Mordecai et al. in speculating functional harm from this specific, unsustained statistical difference to its time-matched control given our larger data set.

Mordecai et al. also singled out PRV exposure as putatively lowering SMR across treatments and time. Unlike for IHNV, however, SMR was not correlated with PRV load as their Fig. 1 shows [1]. Also, PRV did not affect O2crit, a metric which is partly dependent on SMR. Furthermore, if as hypothesized by Mordecai et al. that this change had functional significance, it should be reflected at another level of biological organization — specifically, host transcriptomic signaling and/or altered infection dynamics during IHNV superinfection for which reduced SMR appears to be correlated with resistance. This has not been observed in independent challenge investigations. PRV has not affected metabolic transcriptomic signaling [3], nor has PRV altered IHNV load or morbidity/mortality outcomes during superinfection for which reduced SMR would be expected to provide a functional benefit [2, 4]. Thus, we conclude that it is unlikely that PRV functionally impacted basic metabolic requirements of host salmon as measured by SMR.

Our study did indicate that PRV loads were negatively correlated with Hct and Hb for which we hypothesized host-directed removal of highly infected red blood cells or increased red blood cell fragility as possible explanations. Nevertheless, a transient statistical drop in Hct at 4 Wpc was not reflected in Hb concentration which is a functionally more important measure of maximum oxygen transporting capacity than Hct (although Hct is the easier of the two to measure) — see Fig S2. Biologically speaking, Hct and Hb of teleost fish are not only plastic (to optimize oxygen delivery while minimizing cardiac energy demands [5]), they are highly labile to handling perturbations. Therefore, these statistical changes must be placed in a biological context by juxtaposing the Hct values of PRV-infected tank fish in this study (mean 44% ± 5% SD; minimum 35%) relative to a previously proposed lower threshold for functional harm to prolonged swimming and ṀO2max in a salmonid. This proposed threshold is when Hct is < 22% [6], an appreciable reduction afforded presumably through redundancies in the oxygen transport system. This provides evidence that energetic homeostasis was functionally maintained during PRV infection if Hct averaged 44%. Indeed, our respiratory data confirmed this. ṀO2max, O2crit, and ILOS were not compromised in PRV-injected fish despite a statistical decrease in Hct. We stand by our original statement that any putative harm from reductions in Hct and Hb coinciding is at most a small and temporary effect of PRV infection. An extended EPOCdur, an equally variable parameter as EPOC, might have been a measurable aerobic cost. However, the timeframe to manifest harm relating to exhaustive chase recovery is short. Specifically, high viral loads sufficient to incur a putative EPOCdur extension last for a few weeks at most, the added putative time required to recover from exhaustion during peak infection is a matter of hours (mean ~ 4 h increase; maximum ~ 11 h increase), and a repeated bout of maximal exhaustive exercise would likely be needed during this EPOC period to produce a measurable aerobic cost [7].

Our stated hypotheses were clearly focused on the general energetic consequences of the teleost antiviral defense, and so our statistical and power analyses centered on correlative agreements in concert with analysis of variance across treatments and time using GraphPad Prism — a reputable commercial statistical and graphing program. Given the complexity and interconnectedness of our respiratory metrics, our comprehensive evaluation was further framed in a context of biological relevance for which we considered inherent variability in control populations and couched our conclusions with a current and well-recognized understanding of salmonid respiratory plasticity.

We agree with Mordecai et al. that secondary Dunnett post hoc tests presented in our supplemental material have limited statistical power. Indeed, probability estimates were intentionally presented in this context without false-discovery rate adjustment to demonstrate relaxed type-1 and stringent type-2 error controls as a partial means of mitigating the increased potential for type-2 error associated with low power. Moreover, these analyses provided a visually appealing way to present time- and treatment-specific variability, as well as a cautious means for specifying temporal and pathway-specific resolution identified by ANOVA. Probability estimates (and particularly any arbitrary cutoff values associated with probability estimates) generated during these analyses were not, however, intended to define or speculate on biological relevance and we did not use them for that purpose. We would caution others not to do so as well, as discussed above, without fully providing context to functional importance, inherent biological variability, and technical challenges associated with specific measurements.

We certainly agree with Mordecai et al. that increasing statistical power in defining time-specific treatment variation of post hoc Dunnett tests would aid in identifying minor treatment effects on respiratory parameters including those putatively altered by PRV — i.e., increasing certainty of small virus-specific variations at the sensitivity of post hoc testing. However, as acknowledged by Mordecai et al., the potential benefits must be weighed against the increased monetary, manpower, and animal welfare costs associated with amplified sampling of a very comprehensive study of respiratory physiology and molecular mechanisms. Specifically, samples from more than 140 individuals per treatment per time point (versus 8–16 individuals tested in our study) would be necessary to fulfill the requirements proposed by Mordecai et al. to achieve a statistical power of > 80% at the post hoc test. Overlooking this practical impossibility, we would argue that biological relevance of defining subtle virus manipulations afforded by improved post hoc comparisons would be minimal given the overarching allostatic ability for fish to maintain homeostatic functions as demonstrated in this study. For example, increasing confidence in asserting a transient ~ 8% reduction in mean Hct after a PRV injection does not make the observed change any more functionally relevant given our comprehensive biological knowledge of Hct in fishes [2, 6].

Likewise, we agree with Mordecai et al. that a set of unknown conditions could theoretically occur in natural environments for which PRV could potentially exploit to harmful effect on its host. Indeed, it could be argued that any ecological, biological, or chemical change imposed upon an organism creates a potential for harm. Where we disagree is that our current study suggests this risk would be more than minimal. Indeed, we would have had difficulty choosing a salmon virus with a more supportive literature for low virulence than the PRV isolate we used. Specifically, our PRV isolate (i) has not been known to cause disease in sockeye salmon even under circumstances of persistent high-load systemic infection, host saltwater adaptation, or viral co-infection [3, 8], (ii) has failed to cause disease in at least 4 other related salmon species in multiple saltwater and freshwater challenge trials conducted in the region [9,10,11,12], (iii) has shown minimal association (< 0.3%) and lack of direct causation for morbidity or mortality in commercial Atlantic salmon net-pen production in its endemic region [11, 13], (iv) is considered of low virulence to Norwegian Atlantic salmon and less impactful relative to endemic PRV in that region [14], and (v) has failed to induce respiratory consequences in Atlantic salmon [10] similar to what we identified in Sockeye. In consideration of cumulative evidence and literature, a formal risk assessment commissioned by the government of Canada has further concluded the risks posed to wild sockeye salmon from regionally endemic PRV used in our study to be less than minimal [15]. Our results identifying metabolic and functional maintenance during PRV infection are consistent with these earlier findings and lend support to this conclusion.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are presented within our original published article [2] or within Mordecai et al.’s correspondence [1] relating to that work.


  1. Mordecai G, Bass A, Routledge R, Cicco ED, Teffer A, Deeg C, et al. Assessing the role of Piscine orthoreovirus in disease and the associated risk for wild Pacific salmon. BMC Biol. 2023;21.

  2. Polinski MP, Zhang Y, Morrison PR, Marty GD, Brauner CJ, Farrell AP, et al. Innate antiviral defense demonstrates high energetic efficiency in a bony fish. BMC Biol. 2021;19:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polinski MP, Bradshaw JC, Inkpen SM, Richard J, Fritsvold C, Poppe TT, et al. De novo assembly of Sockeye salmon kidney transcriptomes reveal a limited early response to piscine reovirus with or without infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus superinfection. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Polinski MP, Bradshaw JC, Rise ML, Johnson SC, Garver KA. Sockeye salmon demonstrate robust yet distinct transcriptomic kidney responses to rhabdovirus (IHNV) exposure and infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;94:525–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McArley T, Morgenroth D, Zena L, Ekström A, Sandblom E. Prevalence and mechanisms of environmental hyperoxia-induced thermal tolerance in fishes. Proc Biol Sci. 1981;2022(289):20220840.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallaugher P, Thorarensen H, Farrell AP. Hematocrit in oxygen transport and swimming in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Respir Physiol. 1995;102(2–3):279–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Børsheim E, Bahr R. Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Med. 2003;33:1037–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garver KA, Johnson SC, Polinski MP, Bradshaw JC, Marty GD, Snyman HN, et al. Piscine orthoreovirus from western North America is transmissible to Atlantic salmon and Sockeye salmon but fails to cause Heart and Skeletal Muscle Inflammation. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Purcell MK, Powers RL, Taksdal T, McKenney D, Conway CM, Elliott DG, et al. Consequences of Piscine orthoreovirus genotype one (PRV-1) infections in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (O. kisutch) and rainbow trout (O .mykiss). J Fish Dis. 2020;43:719–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Polinski MP, Morrison PR, Brauner CJ, Farrell AP, Garver KA. High-load reovirus infections do not imply physiological impairment in salmon. Front Physiol. 2019;10:114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Polinski MP, Marty GD, Snyman HN, Garver KA. Piscine othoreovirus demonstrates high infectivity but low virulence in Atlantic salmon of Pacific Canada. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Garver KA, Marty GD, Cockburn SN, Richard J, Hawley LM, Müller A, et al. Piscine reovirus, but not jaundice syndrome, was transmissible to Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum), sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J Fish Dis. 2015;39:117–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Polinski MP, Gross L, Marty GD, Garver KA. Heart inflammation and piscine orthoreovirus genotype-1 in Pacific Canada Atlantic salmon net-pen farms. 2016–2019. BMC Vet Res. 2022;18:306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wessel Ø, Hansen EF, Dahle MK, Alarcon M, Vatne NA, Nyman IB, et al. Piscine Orthoreovirus-1 Isolates Differ in Their Ability to Induce Heart and Skeletal Muscle Inflammation in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Pathogens. 2020;9:1050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mimeault C, Polinski MP, Garver KA, Jones SRM, Johnson S, Boily F, et al. Assessment of the risk to Fraser River Sockeye Salmon due to piscine orthoreovirus ( PRV ) transfer from Atlantic Salmon farms in the Discovery Islands area , British Columbia. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2019/036 viii +45 p.

Download references


No directed funding was received to write this response.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MP drafted the response and all authors participated in editing and refining the final version. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark P. Polinski.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests. No directed funding was received to write this response. Funding of the original research article targeted by this correspondence was provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada which has a mandate to sustainably manage fisheries and aquaculture. The British Columbia Salmon Farmers Association provided collaborative in kind (experimental organisms) as well as monetary (operations and maintenance) contributions to Fisheries and Oceans Canada for that project but did not participate in the experimental study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, and decision to publish; hold no intellectual property rights associated with data or procedures developed in that study; and did not provide financial or nonfinancial support to individual authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polinski, M.P., Zhang, Y., Morrison, P.R. et al. Response to “Assessing the role of Piscine orthoreovirus in disease and the associated risk for wild Pacific salmon”. BMC Biol 21, 115 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: