Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Sexually dimorphic methylation patterns characterize the placenta and blood from extremely preterm newborns

BMC Biology volume 21, Article number: 173 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Health outcomes among children born prematurely are known to be sexually dimorphic, with male infants often more affected, yet the mechanism behind this observation is not clear. CpG methylation levels in the placenta and blood also differ by sex and are associated with adverse health outcomes. We contrasted CpG methylation levels in the placenta and neonatal blood (n = 358) from the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) cohort based on the EPIC array, which assays over 850,000 CpG sites across the epigenome. Sex-specific epigenome-wide association analyses were conducted for the placenta and neonatal blood samples independently, and the results were compared to determine tissue-specific differences between the methylation patterns in males and females. All models were adjusted for cell type heterogeneity. Enrichment pathway analysis was performed to identify the biological functions of genes related to the sexually dimorphic CpG sites.

Results

Approximately 11,500 CpG sites were differentially methylated in relation to sex. Of these, 5949 were placenta-specific and 5361 were blood-specific, with only 233 CpG sites overlapping in both tissues. For placenta-specific CpG sites, 90% were hypermethylated in males. For blood-specific CpG sites, 95% were hypermethylated in females. In the placenta, keratinocyte differentiation biological pathways were enriched among the differentially methylated genes. No enrichment pathways were observed for blood.

Conclusions

Distinct methylation patterns were observed between male and female children born extremely premature, and keratinocyte differentiation pathways were enriched in the placenta. These findings provide new insights into the epigenetic mechanisms underlying sexually dimorphic health outcomes among extremely premature infants.

Background

Individuals born extremely preterm are at increased risk of adverse neonatal and developmental outcomes including sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory distress, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [1, 2]. However, the likelihood of these outcomes is not equal for males and females [3]. In general, males are at higher risk for detrimental health outcomes such as ADHD, ASD, and a plethora of other morbidities compared to females [1, 4,5,6,7]. Although these sexually dimorphic outcomes are well-documented, the underlying mechanisms are understudied.

One important molecular mechanism that may influence sexually dimorphic health outcomes is epigenetic DNA modification through CpG methylation. CpG methylation represents the addition of methyl groups to cytosines that can result in gene suppression or activation without changing the nucleotide sequence [8]. CpG methylation contributes to the regulation of important biological processes during early life development such as transcription, genomic imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, and pluripotency [8, 9]. Males and females are known to have different CpG methylation patterns across the genome and thus is a potential mechanism underlying the male disadvantage in developmental outcomes [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. This sexual dimorphism has been observed in the placenta, cord blood, umbilical artery, and brain tissue methylation levels across the lifespan, demonstrating the breadth and stability of dimorphisms [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Though not clearly understood is its relation to early developmental outcomes, sex differences in methylation patterns in target tissues might underlie, at least in part, sexual divergences in health outcomes [15, 16].

Although the methylation levels of some CpG loci may display conservation across tissues, methylation patterns significantly vary between tissues and are an important part of cell differentiation [18]. Thus, one tissue sample cannot provide a comprehensive assessment of sexually dimorphic molecular changes associated with developmental outcomes. A comparison of the epigenomes within the placenta and blood is warranted, as their CpG methylation signatures have both independently been linked with prenatal exposures, developmental outcomes, and sexual dimorphisms [12, 15, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The placenta has been studied as a sensor and conductor between the mother and the fetus, playing an important role in fetal tissue growth, vascularization, and hormone production [31]. Additionally, it facilitates the supply of nutrients from mother to child and filters harmful substances to protect the fetus [31]. Placental CpG methylation has been associated with both short- and long-term outcomes of extremely premature newborns such as cognitive and socio-behavioral impairment, increased body mass index (BMI), and retinopathy of prematurity [19, 32,33,34,35]. Methylation differences between male and female placentas have been observed, with male placentas typically hypermethylated in males [15]. Similarly, CpG methylation from neonatal blood has been associated with clinical outcomes such as ASD, measures of BMI, and insulin sensitivity [24,25,26]. Unlike the placenta, cord blood tissue is typically hypermethylated in females [10, 11].

While CpG methylation in placental tissue and blood has been studied independently, sexually dimorphic patterns in these two tissues have not been compared. In the present study, we aim to characterize and compare sexually dimorphic DNA methylation patterns in the placenta and neonatal blood on day 1 in extremely premature newborns. Specifically, this study will determine the extent of sexually dimorphic methylation in the placenta and neonatal blood, contrast average methylation levels between male and female newborns, and examine biological pathways associated with differentially methylated genes. We hypothesize that most sexually dimorphic CpG sites will be tissue specific.

Results

Study subject characteristics

The general characteristics of study participants (n = 358) for the present study are described in Table 1. Most mothers were between the ages of 21 and 35 years and completed high school education or more (86.3%) and did not smoke (87.7%). The mean gestational age was 26 weeks, ranging from 23 to 27 weeks. The mean birth weight was 828 g, ranging from 420 to 1420 g. In total, 190 (53.1%) males and 168 (46.9%) females were included in this analysis.

Table 1 Demographic data for subjects for the current study (n = 358). Distributions summarized as the mean [min–max] or n (%)
Full size table

Sexual dimorphism of DNA methylation across the placenta and neonatal blood

We investigated sexually dimorphic patterns of CpG methylation in the placenta and blood, controlling for cell-type heterogeneity. Our analysis identified 11,543 significantly differentially methylated autosomal CpG loci based on sex (Fig. 1). Among these, 51.5% (6182) were placenta-specific, and 46.4% (5594) were blood-specific. It is noteworthy that we observed minimal overlap between the placenta and blood, with only 2% of the CpG loci (233 CpG annotated to 165 genes) showing differential methylation in both tissues (Fig. 2). Additional file 1: Table S1 in the supplemental material provides the list of all significant CpG loci identified.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The left side shows Manhattan plots with the distribution of autosomal sexually dimorphic CpG sites in (A) placenta (n = 6182) and (B) day 1 blood (n = 5594). The right side shows the QQ plots visualizing displaying the genomic inflation for placenta (λgc = 2.74) and blood (λgc = 2.76)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of CpG site methylation associated with sex between the placenta and blood. A total of 11,543 CpG sites displayed sexually dimorphic patterns in methylation: 5949 of these sites were found only in the placenta, and 5361 were found only in the blood sample. Of all sites, 233 (2.0%) were differentially methylated in both tissues

Full size image

In the placenta-specific findings, among the most significantly differentially methylated CpG loci, males had higher average methylation levels as compared to females (Fig. 3, Table 2). The three most significantly differentially methylated annotated CpG loci in male and female placentas were found to be cg11532947 (logFC = 0.96, FDR 5.25E − 117), cg07355069 (logFC = 1.03, FDR 4.71E − 95), and cg25801066 (logFC = 0.76, FDR 4.89E − 79), all of which are located in the regulatory regions of genes. The CpG site cg11532947, located in the 3′UTR region of the NGFI-A binding protein 1 (NAB1) gene, demonstrated higher average methylation levels in males than in females (84% vs 72%, respectively). Similarly, the CpG site cg07355069, located in the 5′UTR region of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 1 (HMGCS1) gene, demonstrated higher average methylation levels in males than in females (92% vs 85%, respectively). Finally, the CpG site cg25801066, located in the 3′UTR region of the 3 Calmodulin 1 (CALM1) gene, demonstrated significantly higher average methylation levels in males than in females (76% vs 65%, respectively) (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of the average beta value differences between males and females for all sexually dimorphic CpG sites. Beta differences greater than 0 represent hypermethylation in males, and beta differences below 0 represent hypermethylation in females. Note the hypermethylation in males in placenta-only CpG sites and hypermethylation in females in blood-only CpG sites

Full size image
Table 2 A summary of sexually dimorphic CpG sites in the blood, placenta, or both tissues considered together. Results are presented as (A) total CpGs found, including tissue-specific and overlapping; (B) unique, tissue-specific CpGs; and (C) overlapping CpGs in each tissue. For overlapping CpGs, the loci are identical between blood and placenta tissue, but methylation levels vary
Full size table
Table 3 Top 25 most sexually dimorphic CpG sites found in the (A) blood only, (B) placenta only, (C) planceta and blood (blood methylation levels shown). The annotated gene is provided where known
Full size table

In the blood-specific findings, among the most significantly differentially methylated CpG loci, males had lower average methylation levels as compared to females (Fig. 3, Table 2). The three most significantly differentially methylated annotated CpG loci in male and female blood were found to be cg04946709 (logFC = 0.75, FDR 7.75E − 85), cg11284736 (logFC = 0.68, FDR 3.10E − 76), and cg16021537 (logFC =  − 0.91, FDR 1.94E − 49), all of which are in the regulatory regions of genes. The CpG site cg04946709, located in the TSS1500 region of the apolipoprotein O pseudogene 5 (LOC644649) gene, demonstrated higher average methylation levels in males than in females (79% vs 70%, respectively). Similarly, the CpG site cg11284736, located in the hepatoma-derived growth factor-related protein 3 (HDGFRP3) gene, demonstrated higher average methylation levels in males than in females (82% vs 75%, respectively). Finally, the CpG site cg16021537, located in the 1st exon of the RNA-binding motif single-stranded interacting protein 1 (RBMS1) gene, demonstrated lower average methylation levels in males than in females (5% vs 9%, respectively) (Table 3).

In both tissues, the CpG loci with the most significant differential methylation levels in were cg26919182 (logFC =  − 3.00, FDR 1.23E − 247) located in the 5′UTR region of the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12B (PPP1R12B) gene on chromosome 1, with an average methylation of 52% in males and 89% in females; cg06513015 (logFC =  − 1.78, FDR 3.09E − 189) located in the 5′UTR region of the 3-endogenous retrovirus group 3 member 1 envelope (ERV3-1) gene on chromosome 7, with an average methylation of 62% in males and 84% in females; and cg00148935 (logFC =  − 1.60, FDR 3.07E − 171) located in the 3′UTR region of the raftlin lipid raft linker 1 (RFTN1) gene on chromosome 3, with an average methylation of 52% in males and 76% in females.

Enrichment analysis revealed six Gene Ontology categories significantly associated with the placenta-specific CpG loci (Table 4), with the most significant being keratinocyte differentiation (FDR 1.43E − 05) and keratinization (FDR 1.66E − 05). No significant associations were observed for the blood-specific CpG loci or the CpG loci found in both tissues.

Table 4 Gene Ontology enrichment results for CpG loci identified as significant in placenta specific analysis
Full size table

Discussion

Children who are born prematurely exhibit sexually dimorphic patterns in health outcomes during and after the neonatal period [1, 4,5,6,7]. However, the biological mechanisms that cause the differences in health outcomes between males and females are not well-studied. In this study, we aimed to identify and compare patterns of CpG methylation in the placenta and blood that could be responsible for the sexually dimorphic health outcomes in children. Our findings revealed notable differences in CpG methylation patterns between males and females in both tissues. In males, there was a general trend of hypomethylation in blood and hypermethylation in the placenta. The study also found that there was limited overlap in the CpG sites that were sexually dimorphic between the placenta and blood, indicating that genes that are methylated in a dimorphic manner have specific tissue responses.

Our study found significant differences in CpG loci methylation levels in placenta-specific genes, with the most significant changes observed in NAB1, HMGCS1, and CALM1 genes. NAB1 is involved in regulating gene expression and neuronal differentiation. One study found that NAB1 was differentially methylated in the placenta and cord blood samples based on infant sex [12]. HMGCS1 is critical for cholesterol and ketone body metabolism and has been previously identified to be methylated in the placenta and cord blood in a sexually dimorphic manner [12]. Importantly, HMGCS1 has been implicated in placental function. For example, a study found that HMGCS1 is associated with vascular dysfunction of the placenta [36]. Regarding CALM1, this gene encodes calmodulin, a calcium-binding protein involved in cell signaling. CALM1 has been implicated in regulating uterine contractions and preeclampsia [37]. A term placenta study, however, did not find DNA methylation of CALM1 to be sexually dimorphic [38].

Similarly in the blood-specific findings, we identified significant differential methylation in several CpG loci, with the most statistically significant ones being annotated to the LOC644649 and RBMS1 genes. LOC644649 encodes for apolipoprotein O, a protein involved in lipid metabolism and cardiovascular disease [39], and has been showing sexually dimorphic DNA methylation patterns in cord blood samples [12]. RBMS1 is required for radial migration, polarization, and differentiation of neuronal progenitors to neurons in the neocortex development [40] but has not shown a sexually dimorphic pattern in a blood DNA methylation analysis [41]. Our study identified several genes with significantly differentially methylated CpG sites in both placenta and blood, with potential implications for sex dimorphism in child health outcomes. The PPP1R12B, ERV3-1, and RFTN1 genes were the most significantly differentially methylated in both tissues. Of interest, PPP1R12B encodes for the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit, which has been implicated in a range of biological processes, including cell motility and contractility. RFTN1 encodes for raftlin, a protein involved in lipid raft signaling. Like our findings, another study found sexually dimorphic DNA methylation patterns in the placenta and cord blood for CpG loci in PPP1R12B and RFTN1 [12].

Our study supports the previously reported existence of sexually dimorphic DNA methylation patterns in fetal tissues, including the placenta and umbilical cord blood, which are associated with sex-specific differences in the gene expression and fetal development [12, 42]. Specifically, we found that 893 differentially methylated CpG loci in the placenta tissue and 1382 CpG loci in the blood were in common with the findings of Bozack et al. [12]. Additionally, we identified 3750 CpG loci for blood that were in common with Solomon et al.’s study [42]. The list of common CpG loci is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Bozack et al. [12] examined the associations between infant sex and DNA methylation across the umbilical cord blood, artery, and placenta samples. The study found significant sex-based differences in DNA methylation patterns in all three tissue types, with males having lower average methylation levels than females at specific CpG sites. Solomon et al. performed a meta-analysis of the association of sex and cord blood DNA methylation at over 450,000 CpG sites in 8438 newborns from 17 cohorts participating in the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium [42].

Interestingly, methylation patterns of the sexually dimorphic CpG sites differed between tissues. In the placenta, roughly 90% of all sexually dimorphic CpG sites were hypermethylated in males; the reverse was true for blood, with approximately 95% of sexually dimorphic CpG sites hypermethylated in females. This unique reversal of methylation level was expected and has been described previously but is not well understood [10,11,12, 15]. However, we observed minimal overlap (only 2% of the CpG loci) between the differentially methylated CpG sites in the placenta and blood, suggesting the existence of tissue-specific epigenetic regulation mechanisms in the context of sexual dimorphism. CpG methylation is known to play a role in cell differentiation and tissue-specific function and was therefore expected to vary between the placenta and blood to an extent [12]. One possible explanation for the tissue specificity observed here is that both the placenta and blood tissues have unique structures and functions for males and females, controlled, at least in part, by CpG methylation. In the placenta, there are sex differences in size, shape, vasculature, and gene expression [43]. In the blood, there are known differences in the metabolomic profiles [44], rheologic properties (viscosity, red blood cell aggregation, and oxygen delivery index) [45], and immune cell concentrations from childhood through adulthood [46]. The genes (and related CpG sites) that control the sex-specific structure and function of these tissues are expected to differ between tissues, potentially explaining the minimal amount of overlapping sexually dimorphic CpGs observed here.

Conclusions

Several factors should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. First, the ELGAN cohort comprises children who were all born extremely preterm (born before 28 weeks of gestation), potentially limiting the generalizability of our results. Because inflammation is a risk factor for preterm birth, the specific CpG methylation levels identified here may not be generalizable for tissues collected from term infants. Second, we compared DNA methylation patterns between two tissues (placenta and blood) to identify similarities in patterns associated with sex differences. However, although we adjusted for cell type, sex differences in DNA methylation between placenta and blood could be affected by cell types so the common CpGs are of interest. DNA methylation is tissue-specific, and differences in methylation of individual CpG sites are probably less important than sexually dimorphic methylation patterns in the blood and placenta. However, these results only capture two perinatal tissues and may not be representative of the comprehensive methylome across the body. Lastly, this analysis did not include transcriptional data; thus, we could not determine which methylation findings are associated with gene expression function. This study provides valuable and unique information about the sexual dimorphism of the placental and blood methylomes. Future studies should address these limitations to continue elucidating the biological mechanisms surrounding sexual dimorphism that are linked to differential health and disease risk among children.

Methods

The ELGAN cohort

This study included data from the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) cohort, which was enrolled in a prospective study designed to examine the risk of structural and neurologic disorders in extremely preterm children [47]. Between 2002 and 2004, women delivering before 28 weeks of gestation were asked to enroll in the study from five states (North Carolina, Massachusetts, Michigan, Illinois, Connecticut) across 14 participating institutions. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained at each site. Overall, 1249 mothers of 1506 infants were enrolled, but only 415 participants had placenta specimens and 390 had neonatal blood analyzed for DNA methylation. Of the participants with DNA methylation data, 358 had both placenta and peripheral blood biospecimens analyzed for DNA methylation that allowed us to complete the analysis for this manuscript (detailed further below). Previous studies have shown no systemic difference between the complete ELGAN cohort and the subset of the samples with DNA methylation [19, 48].

Placenta tissue and neonatal blood collection

Placenta tissue collection within the ELGAN cohort has been described in detail elsewhere [15, 49, 50]. Briefly, at delivery, the placentas were collected and placed in a sterile basin and transferred to a sampling room where they were biopsied. A sample (< 1 g) of fetal-derived placental tissue was biopsied by pulling back the chorion and amnion. Sterile 2-mL cryovials with the samples were submerged in liquid nitrogen and stored in a − 80 °C freezer. Using blood spot filter paper cards (Schleicher & Schuell 903, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL), neonatal blood was collected at postnatal day 1 (range, 1–3 days) and stored at − 70 °C in sealed bags with desiccant until processing.

DNA extraction and methylation assessment

The placental samples were sliced into ~ 0.2-g segments with a sterile dermal curette. The segments were then washed in 1 × PBS (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) to reduce any potential blood contamination. Following washing, samples were immediately snap-frozen in homogenization tubes and placed back on dry ice. The final processing step involved homogenizing the tissue segments using a sterile stainless-steel bead (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in RLT + lysis buffer (Qiagen) with the TissueLyserII instrument (Qiagen). This clarifies the samples through spinning to remove the cellular debris and the bead. Homogenized samples were stored at − 80 °C until nucleic acid extraction.

Blood spots were collected on filter paper (Schleicher & Schuell 903, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) and stored at − 70 °C in sealed bags with desiccant until processing. To extract DNA from the dried blood spots, 3-mm diameter spots were punched from the filter paper, lysed in Proteinase K solution from the EZ1 DNA Investigator kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and shaken in a thermomixer. The resulting supernatant was processed using the Qiagen EZ1 Advanced instrument according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity of DNA was assessed using a DropSense 96 Spectrophotometer (Trinean, Pleasanton, CA), with a minimum of 20 ng DNA considered acceptable for methylation analysis.

The ALLPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (Qiagen) was used to isolate DNA sequences > 18 nucleotides long. Bisulfite conversion was then performed using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). Methylation status was quantified utilizing the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which can evaluate methylation at more than 850,000 CpG sites across the genome.

Methylation data quality assessment and quality control

All the analyses described here were conducted in the R software. In the processing and normalization of the DNA methylation data, we evaluated sex mismatches using the minfi (v1.36.0) package [51], removed probes that failed quality control (p value > 0.01), removed outliers, and assessed and controlled for batch effects. For the placental methylation data, these steps removed 4 samples for sex mismatches and removed zero samples based on the sample-based filter. For the dried blood spot methylation data, these steps removed 18 samples for sex mismatches and 4 samples based on the sample filter. These steps resulted in a total of 358 samples for the current analysis. Additionally, 1597 (of 850,000) CpG loci from the placental methylation data and 79,458 (of 850,000) loci from the dried blood spot methylation data were removed through the probe-based filter. The ShinyMethyl (v1.26.0) package was used simultaneously with the above steps to visually verify the data [52]. The data were then normalized utilizing the normal-exponential out-of-band (noob) correction method and functional normalization [53]. Batch effects were identified using principal components analysis in combination with visualizing data using plate position, chip, array, and date covariates. Plate position was determined to potentially be inducing batch effects in the placenta and dried blood spot methylation data. Batch effects were removed utilizing the ComBat function within the sva (v3.38.0) package [54, 55]. Following batch effect correction, final β values were generated and then converted to M values ([log2(β/(1 − β)]), as these are more statistically valid for subsequent analysis [56].

Cell type estimation

To control for cell-type effects on DNA methylation patterns, cell-type proportions were empirically estimated in both the placenta and dried blood spot data. Cell type estimation for the placenta methylation data was conducted utilizing the planet package (v0.99.4) [57,58,59,60]. In order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the cell-type variation observed in the second trimester placenta samples used in this study (ranging from 161 to 191 gestational days or 23–28 weeks), we calculated the average of the first and third trimester libraries. This enabled us to capture the full range of cell types present in the samples more effectively. For the blood data, cell type estimation was conducted utilizing the FlowSorted.Blood.EPIC package (v1.8.0), specifically utilizing the cord blood-derived reference library [61, 62].

Statistical analysis

Epigenome wide-associated studies (EWAS) were conducted separately for the placental and blood spot DNA methylation datasets. For both placental and blood spot methylations, we evaluated the association between CpG methylation and sex while excluding cross-reactive probes and probes annotated to X and Y chromosomes. Cross-reactive probes were previously generated by Chen et al. using an approach to identify array probes potentially generating spurious signals due to co-hybridization to alternate sequences homologous to intended targets [63]. Sex chromosomes were excluded from this analysis for three reasons: (1) sex chromosomes have unique patterns of gene regulation compared to autosomes. The X chromosome, for example, is subject to X-inactivation in females, which results in the silencing of one of the two X chromosomes, while the Y chromosome has a limited number of genes. These unique features of the sex chromosomes make it difficult to compare DNA methylation patterns between males and females; (2) the sex chromosomes are present in different numbers in males and females. Females have two X chromosomes, while males have one X and one Y chromosome. This difference in the number of sex chromosomes could potentially affect DNA methylation patterns and lead to false-positive or false-negative associations; and (3) the exclusion of sex chromosomes from sex dimorphism analysis allows for better statistical power and more reliable results.

Models were fit for each CpG locus using the CpG M value as the response variable and sex as the main predictor using robust linear regression with the limma package (v3.46.0) [64]. All models were adjusted for cell type heterogeneity using the PCA-derived variables (described previously). Moderated test statistics were calculated using an empirical Bayes method to shrink probe-wise sample variance towards a common value and control for test-statistic inflation using the ebayes function in limma. p values were considered significant after using the Bonferroni correction method with an α value of 0.05.

Pathway enrichment analysis

To investigate the biological pathways associated with sexually dimorphic CpG sites, enrichment analyses were performed using missMethyl package in R [65]. The analysis included all statistically significant sexually dimorphic CpG sites found (1) only in the placenta, (2) only in blood, and (3) in both placenta and blood tissues.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplemental information files and publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus GSE167885.

References

  1. Dvir Y, Frazier JA, Joseph RM, Mokrova I, Moore PS, OʼShea TM, Hooper SR, Santos HP, Jr., Kuban K, Investigators ES. Psychiatric symptoms: prevalence, co-occurrence, and functioning among extremely low gestational age newborns at age 10 years. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019;40(9):725–734.

  2. Taylor GL, O’Shea TM. Extreme prematurity: risk and resiliency. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2022;52(2): 101132.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuban KC, Joseph RM, O’shea TM, Allred EN, Heeren T, Douglass L, Stafstrom CE, Jara H, Frazier JA, Hirtz D. Girls and boys born before 28 weeks gestation: risks of cognitive, behavioral, and neurologic outcomes at age 10 years. J Pediatr. 2016;173(69–75): e61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kent AL, Wright IM, Abdel-Latif ME, Wales NS. Group ACTNICUA: Mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):124–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson DK, Verter J, Fanaroff AA, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, Shankaran S, Donovan EF, Wright LL, Lemons JA, Tyson JE, et al. Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83(3):F182–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Aibar L, Puertas A, Valverde M, Carrillo MP, Montoya F. Fetal sex and perinatal outcomes. 2012;40(3):271–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao D, Zou L, Lei X, Zhang Y. Gender differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in mixed-gender twins. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8736.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(1):23–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hackett JA, Surani MA. DNA methylation dynamics during the mammalian life cycle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1609):20110328–20110328.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Maschietto M, Bastos LC, Tahira AC, Bastos EP, Euclydes VL, Brentani A, Fink G, de Baumont A, Felipe-Silva A, Francisco RP, et al. Sex differences in DNA methylation of the cord blood are related to sex-bias psychiatric diseases. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44547.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yousefi P, Huen K, Davé V, Barcellos L, Eskenazi B, Holland N. Sex differences in DNA methylation assessed by 450 K BeadChip in newborns. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):911.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bozack AK, Colicino E, Just AC, Wright RO, Baccarelli AA, Wright RJ, Lee AG. Associations between infant sex and DNA methylation across umbilical cord blood, artery, and placenta samples. Epigenetics. 2021;52(2):1–18.

  13. Xu H, Wang F, Liu Y, Yu Y, Gelernter J, Zhang H. Sex-biased methylome and transcriptome in human prefrontal cortex. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(5):1260–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall E, Volkov P, Dayeh T, Esguerra JLS, Salö S, Eliasson L, Rönn T, Bacos K, Ling C. Sex differences in the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern and impact on gene expression, microRNA levels and insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):522–522.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin E, Smeester L, Bommarito PA, Grace MR, Boggess K, Kuban K, Karagas MR, Marsit CJ, O’Shea TM, Fry RC. Sexual epigenetic dimorphism in the human placenta: implications for susceptibility during the prenatal period. Epigenomics. 2017;9(3):267–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Xia Y, Dai R, Wang K, Jiao C, Zhang C, Xu Y, Li H, Jing X, Chen Y, Jiang Y, et al. Sex-differential DNA methylation and associated regulation networks in human brain implicated in the sex-biased risks of psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(3):835–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singmann P, Shem-Tov D, Wahl S, Grallert H, Fiorito G, Shin S-Y, Schramm K, Wolf P, Kunze S, Baran Y, et al. Characterization of whole-genome autosomal differences of DNA methylation between men and women. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8(1):43.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herzog EM, Eggink AJ, Willemsen SP, Slieker RC, Felix JF, Stubbs AP, van der Spek PJ, van Meurs JBJ, Heijmans BT, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. The tissue-specific aspect of genome-wide DNA methylation in newborn and placental tissues: implications for epigenetic epidemiologic studies. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2021;12(1):113–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Santos HP Jr, Bhattacharya A, Joseph RM, Smeester L, Kuban KCK, Marsit CJ, O’Shea TM, Fry RC. Evidence for the placenta-brain axis: multi-omic kernel aggregation predicts intellectual and social impairment in children born extremely preterm. Mol Autism. 2020;11(1):97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meakin CJ, Martin EM, Szilagyi JT, Nylander-French LA, Fry RC. Inorganic arsenic as an endocrine disruptor: modulation of the glucocorticoid receptor pathway in placental cells via CpG methylation. Chem Res Toxicol. 2019;32(3):493–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt RJ, Schroeder DI, Crary-Dooley FK, Barkoski JM, Tancredi DJ, Walker CK, Ozonoff S, Hertz-Picciotto I, LaSalle JM. Self-reported pregnancy exposures and placental DNA methylation in the MARBLES prospective autism sibling study. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2(4).

  22. Martin EM, Fry RC. A cross-study analysis of prenatal exposures to environmental contaminants and the epigenome: support for stress-responsive transcription factor occupancy as a mediator of gene-specific CpG methylation patterning. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2(1).

  23. Abraham E, Rousseaux S, Agier L, Giorgis-Allemand L, Tost J, Galineau J, Hulin A, Siroux V, Vaiman D, Charles M-A, et al. Pregnancy exposure to atmospheric pollution and meteorological conditions and placental DNA methylation. Environ Int. 2018;118:334–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hannon E, Schendel D, Ladd-Acosta C, Grove J, Hansen CS, Andrews SV, Hougaard DM, Bresnahan M, Mors O, Hollegaard MV, et al. Elevated polygenic burden for autism is associated with differential DNA methylation at birth. Genome Med. 2018;10(1):19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kochmanski J, Goodrich JM, Peterson KE, Lumeng JC, Dolinoy DC. Neonatal bloodspot DNA methylation patterns are associated with childhood weight status in the Healthy Families Project. Pediatr Res. 2019;85(6):848–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Dijk SJ, Peters TJ, Buckley M, Zhou J, Jones PA, Gibson RA, Makrides M, Muhlhausler BS, Molloy PL. DNA methylation in blood from neonatal screening cards and the association with BMI and insulin sensitivity in early childhood. Int J Obes. 2018;42(1):28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hannon E, Schendel D, Ladd-Acosta C, Grove J, Hansen CS, Hougaard DM, Bresnahan M, Mors O, Hollegaard MV, Bækvad-Hansen M. Variable DNA methylation in neonates mediates the association between prenatal smoking and birth weight. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2019;374(1770):20180120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith AK, Conneely KN, Newport DJ, Kilaru V, Schroeder JW, Pennell PB, Knight BT, Cubells JC, Stowe ZN, Brennan PA. Prenatal antiepileptic exposure associates with neonatal DNA methylation differences. Epigenetics. 2012;7(5):458–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Montrose L, Goodrich JM, Morishita M, Kochmanski J, Klaver Z, Cavalcante R, Lumeng JC, Peterson KE, Dolinoy DC. Neonatal lead (Pb) exposure and DNA methylation profiles in dried bloodspots. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6775.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin EM, Fry RC. Environmental influences on the epigenome: exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):309–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gude NM, Roberts CT, Kalionis B, King RG. Growth and function of the normal human placenta. Thromb Res. 2004;114(5):397–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Santos HP Jr, Bhattacharya A, Martin EM, Addo K, Psioda M, Smeester L, Joseph RM, Hooper SR, Frazier JA, Kuban KC, et al. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation in placentas from preterm infants: association with maternal socioeconomic status. Epigenetics. 2019;14(8):751–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Meakin CJ, Martin EM, Santos HP Jr, Mokrova I, Kuban K, O’Shea TM, Joseph RM, Smeester L, Fry RC. Placental CpG methylation of HPA-axis genes is associated with cognitive impairment at age 10 among children born extremely preterm. Horm Behav. 2018;101:29–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Clark J, Martin E, Bulka CM, Smeester L, Santos HP, O’Shea TM, Fry RC. Associations between placental CpG methylation of metastable epialleles and childhood body mass index across ages one, two and ten in the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns (ELGAN) cohort. Epigenetics. 2019;14(11):1102–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bulka CM, Dammann O, Santos HP Jr, VanderVeen DK, Smeester L, Fichorova R, O’Shea TM, Fry RC. Placental CpG methylation of inflammation, angiogenic, and neurotrophic genes and retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(8):2888–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ying X, Zhu Y, Jin X, Chang X. Umbilical cord plasma-derived exosomes from preeclamptic women induce vascular dysfunction by targeting HMGCS1 in endothelial cells. Placenta. 2021;103:86–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ren Z, Gao Y, Gao Y, Liang G, Chen Q, Jiang S, Yang X, Fan C, Wang H, Wang J, et al. Distinct placental molecular processes associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Theranostics. 2021;11(10):5028–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Inkster AM, Yuan V, Konwar C, Matthews AM, Brown CJ, Robinson WP. A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta. Biol Sex Differ. 2021;12(1):38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Olivieri O, Stranieri C, Bassi A, Zaia B, Girelli D, Pizzolo F, Trabetti E, Cheng S, Grow MA, Pignatti PF, et al. ApoC-III gene polymorphisms and risk of coronary artery disease. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(9):1450–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Habib K, Bishayee K, Kang J, Sadra A, Huh SO. RNA binding protein Rbms1 enables neuronal differentiation and radial migration during neocortical development by binding and stabilizing the RNA message for Efr3a. Mol Cells. 2022;45(8):588–602.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Grant OA, Wang Y, Kumari M, Zabet NR, Schalkwyk L. Characterising sex differences of autosomal DNA methylation in whole blood using the Illumina EPIC array. Clin Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Solomon O, Huen K, Yousefi P, Küpers LK, González JR, Suderman M, Reese SE, Page CM, Gruzieva O, Rzehak P, et al. Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in newborns and children show widespread sex differences in blood DNA methylation. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2022;789: 108415.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kalisch-Smith JI, Simmons DG, Dickinson H, Moritz KM. Review: sexual dimorphism in the formation, function and adaptation of the placenta. Placenta. 2017;54:10–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ruoppolo M, Scolamiero E, Caterino M, Mirisola V, Franconi F, Campesi I. Female and male human babies have distinct blood metabolomic patterns. Mol BioSyst. 2015;11(9):2483–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kameneva MV, Watach MJ, Borovetz HS. Gender difference in rheologic properties of blood and risk of cardiovascular diseases. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 1999;21(3–4):357–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):626–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O’shea T, Allred E, Dammann O, Hirtz D, Kuban K, Paneth N, Leviton A, Investigators ES. The ELGAN study of the brain and related disorders in extremely low gestational age newborns. Early Human Dev. 2009;85(11):719–25.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Eaves LA, Enggasser AE, Camerota M, Gogcu S, Gower WA, Hartwell H, Jackson WM, Jensen E, Joseph RM, Marsit CJ, et al. CpG methylation patterns in placenta and neonatal blood are differentially associated with neonatal inflammation. Pediatr Res. 2022;83(3):F182–F185.

  49. Addo KA, Bulka C, Dhingra R, Santos HP, Smeester L, O’Shea TM, Fry RC. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and DNA methylation in the placenta of the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn (ELGAN) cohort. Environ Epigenet. 2019;5(2):dvz010.

  50. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, DuBois AM, Allred EN, Leviton A. Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns Study I: Detection of bacteria in placental tissues obtained from extremely low gestational age neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):110.e111-117.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, Irizarry RA. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1363–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Fortin J-P, Fertig E, Hansen K: shinyMethyl: interactive quality control of Illumina 450k DNA methylation arrays in R. F1000Res. 2014;3:175.

  53. Fortin J-P, Triche TJ, Hansen KD. Preprocessing, normalization and integration of the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC array with minfi. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(4):558–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Du P, Zhang X, Huang C-C, Jafari N, Kibbe WA, Hou L, Lin SM. Comparison of beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan V, Robinson W: Placental DNA methylation analysis tools. 0.99.4 edn. 2021. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/planet.

  58. Yuan V, Price EM, Del Gobbo G, Mostafavi S, Cox B, Binder AM, Michels KB, Marsit C, Robinson WP. Accurate ethnicity prediction from placental DNA methylation data. Epigenet Chromatin. 2019;12(1):51.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lee Y, Choufani S, Weksberg R, Wilson SL, Yuan V, Burt A, Marsit C, Lu AT, Ritz B, Bohlin J, et al. Placental epigenetic clocks: estimating gestational age using placental DNA methylation levels. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(12):4238–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yuan V, Hui D, Yin Y, Peñaherrera MS, Beristain AG, Robinson WP. Cell-specific characterization of the placental methylome. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Salas L, Koestler D. FlowSorted.Blood.EPIC: Illumina EPIC data on immunomagnetic sorted peripheral adult blood cells. In: 1.10.1 edn. Bioconductor; 2021.

  62. Salas LA, Koestler DC, Butler RA, Hansen HM, Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT, Christensen BC. An optimized library for reference-based deconvolution of whole-blood biospecimens assayed using the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadArray. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen Y-a, Lemire M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Grafodatskaya D, Zanke BW, Gallinger S, Hudson TJ, Weksberg R. Lemire M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Grafodatskaya D, Zanke BW, Gallinger S, Hudson TJ, Weksberg R: Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8(2):203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47–e47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Phipson B, Maksimovic J, Oshlack A. missMethyl: an R package for analyzing data from Illumina’s HumanMethylation450 platform. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(2):286–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are especially grateful to the participants and their families whose commitment to the ELGAN Study has made this work possible. The authors acknowledge the inspiration, guidance, and collaboration of all the ELGAN research investigators and study staff.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), specifically the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS040069; R01NS040069), the Office of the NIH Director (UG3OD023348), the National Institute of Nursing Research (K23NR017898; R01NR019245), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD092374; R03HD101413), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences training grant (T32ES007018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA

    Hudson P. Santos Jr.

  2. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Adam E. Enggasser, Jeliyah Clark, Kyle Roell, Vasyl Zhabotynsky & Rebecca C. Fry

  3. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Jeliyah Clark, Kyle Roell & Rebecca C. Fry

  4. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    William Adam Gower & T. Michael O’Shea

  5. Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Diana Yanni

  6. Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Nou Gao Yang, Lisa Washburn & Semsa Gogcu

  7. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Carmen J. Marsit

  8. Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Boston. University, Boston, MA, USA

    Karl Kuban

  9. Curriculum in Toxicology and Environmental Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Rebecca C. Fry

Authors
  1. Hudson P. Santos Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam E. Enggasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeliyah Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kyle Roell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vasyl Zhabotynsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. William Adam Gower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Diana Yanni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nou Gao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lisa Washburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Semsa Gogcu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Carmen J. Marsit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Karl Kuban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. T. Michael O’Shea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Rebecca C. Fry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HPS, TMO, and RCF contributed to the study conception and design. RCF and TMO contributed to the acquisition of the data. HPS, AEE, JC, KR, VZ, and RCF contributed to the analysis. HPS, AEE, JC, KR, VZ, WAG, DY, NGY, LW, SG, CJM, KK, TMO, and RCF contributed to the interpretation of the data. HPS drafted the manuscript. HPS, AEE, JC, KR, VZ, WAG, DY, NGY, LW, SG, CJM, KK, TMO, and RCF substantively revised the manuscript. All authors have agreed be accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work presented in this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hudson P. Santos Jr..

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRB approval # 16–2535). Informed consent was given by all participants in the ELGAN study.

Consent for publication

N/a.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Provides a list of all significant CpG loci identified in the analysis presented in this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, H.P., Enggasser, A.E., Clark, J. et al. Sexually dimorphic methylation patterns characterize the placenta and blood from extremely preterm newborns. BMC Biol 21, 173 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01662-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01662-7

Keywords

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us