Genomic organization, evolution, and expression of photoprotein and opsin genes in Mnemiopsis leidyi: a new view of ctenophore photocytes
BMC Biology volume 10, Article number: 107 (2012)
Calcium-activated photoproteins are luciferase variants found in photocyte cells of bioluminescent jellyfish (Phylum Cnidaria) and comb jellies (Phylum Ctenophora). The complete genomic sequence from the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, a representative of the earliest branch of animals that emit light, provided an opportunity to examine the genome of an organism that uses this class of luciferase for bioluminescence and to look for genes involved in light reception. To determine when photoprotein genes first arose, we examined the genomic sequence from other early-branching taxa. We combined our genomic survey with gene trees, developmental expression patterns, and functional protein assays of photoproteins and opsins to provide a comprehensive view of light production and light reception in Mnemiopsis.
The Mnemiopsis genome has 10 full-length photoprotein genes situated within two genomic clusters with high sequence conservation that are maintained due to strong purifying selection and concerted evolution. Photoprotein-like genes were also identified in the genomes of the non-luminescent sponge Amphimedon queenslandica and the non-luminescent cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, and phylogenomic analysis demonstrated that photoprotein genes arose at the base of all animals. Photoprotein gene expression in Mnemiopsis embryos begins during gastrulation in migrating precursors to photocytes and persists throughout development in the canals where photocytes reside. We identified three putative opsin genes in the Mnemiopsis genome and show that they do not group with well-known bilaterian opsin subfamilies. Interestingly, photoprotein transcripts are co-expressed with two of the putative opsins in developing photocytes. Opsin expression is also seen in the apical sensory organ. We present evidence that one opsin functions as a photopigment in vitro, absorbing light at wavelengths that overlap with peak photoprotein light emission, raising the hypothesis that light production and light reception may be functionally connected in ctenophore photocytes. We also present genomic evidence of a complete ciliary phototransduction cascade in Mnemiopsis.
This study elucidates the genomic organization, evolutionary history, and developmental expression of photoprotein and opsin genes in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, introduces a novel dual role for ctenophore photocytes in both bioluminescence and phototransduction, and raises the possibility that light production and light reception are linked in this early-branching non-bilaterian animal.
Bioluminescence is observed in a wide variety of organisms across the tree of life. Luminous organisms include bacteria, dinoflagellates, radiolarians, fungi, ctenophores, cnidarians, annelids, mollusks, arthropods, echinoderms, tunicates, and fishes . These organisms utilize bioluminescence for essential functions ranging from defense to reproduction. The ability to produce light always entails a chemiluminescent reaction where the light-emitting substrate - a luciferin - is oxidized by a specific enzyme - a luciferase. Luciferins and luciferases are highly variable in their chemical structure and protein sequence. For this reason, it is thought that bioluminescence arose independently many times throughout evolution .
Coelenterazine is the predominant luciferin observed in the ocean environment  and is the specific type of luciferin used in the bioluminescence of jellyfish (Phylum Cnidaria) and comb jellies, or ctenophores (Phylum Ctenophora). Because the complete biosynthesis pathway of coelenterazine is not yet known, it is unclear whether ctenophores synthesize coelenterazine or obtain it from external sources, such as through their diet, as is seen with other species [2–4], including hydrozoan cnidarians .
Calcium-activated photoproteins are a special class of luciferase found in cnidarians and ctenophores. In these organisms, the factors required for light emission, including the luciferin (coelenterazine) and oxygen, undergo a covalent reaction in which a peroxy intermediate of the coelenterazine is formed. This is bound to the photoprotein as one complex that, in turn, produces light upon binding another cofactor, Ca2+. Cells containing photoproteins are capable of emitting light in proportion to the amount of photoprotein complex present within them , which is in contrast to a typical luciferin-luciferase reaction, where turnover occurs. In those cases, there may be an excess of luciferase, or one luciferase may catalyze multiple reactions, but the total amount of light emitted is proportional to the amount of luciferin present. Importantly, the term photoprotein can refer to the photoprotein complex or to the luciferase alone (also known as the apo-protein), excluding the substrate and oxygen. It is in this latter sense that we use the terms photoprotein and photoprotein gene from here onwards. The best-known photoproteins are aequorin, from the hydromedusan jellyfish Aequorea victoria, and mnemiopsin, from the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi, both of which were first purified in the 1960s and 1970s [7–9]. Aequorin was subsequently cloned and sequenced [10, 11]. Since then, photoproteins have been cloned from a number of hydromedusan (Phylum Cnidaria) species. These include mitrocomin from Mitrocoma cellularia , clytin from Clytia gregarium , and obelin from both Obelia longissima and O. geniculata [14, 15], as well as other photoproteins from Aequorea species such as A. coerulescens, A. macrodactyla, and A. parva. Berovin and bolinopsin from the ctenophores Beroe abyssicola [16, 17] and Bolinopsis infundibulum [18, 19] were subsequently cloned and sequenced. Recently, sequences for two photoproteins from Mnemiopsis leidyi, named mnemiopsin 1 and mnemiopsin 2, have been reported [20, 21].
Photoproteins are also EF-hand calcium-binding domain proteins related to calmodulin, troponin C, myosin, spectrin, and sarcoplasmic binding protein . EF-hand proteins are distinct from other calcium-binding proteins in that they have calcium-binding helix-loop-helix motifs characterized by a 'canonical' sequence loop region of 12 contiguous residues that provides the oxygen ligands needed for calcium ion coordination . EF-hand domains are usually present in pairs in proteins; this pairing seems to be important for proper protein folding and may increase the affinity of each EF-hand for calcium [22–24]. All photoproteins have three functional EF-hand domains (termed I, III, and IV) that are used to bind calcium. The crystal structures of aequorin and clytin showed that a fourth putative EF-hand domain (II) has the characteristic structural features of an EF-hand motif but not the canonical sequence normally seen within the calcium-binding loop . In addition, its sequence does not conform to EF-hand profiles catalogued in domain databases such as Pfam and SMART.
Biochemical isolations have shown that native photoproteins consist of a mixture of 'isoforms' (also called isoproteins or isospecies) and that there can be differences in properties among isoforms from a single taxon. Aequorin, for example, consists of at least a dozen isoforms that differ in isoelectric point but not in molecular size [26, 27]. Mnemiopsin was found to consist of two major isoforms (named mnemiopsin-1 and mnemiopsin-2), each with two or three minor isoforms [9, 28]. The different isoforms can have measurable functional differences; for example, the rate constant for decay of light emission in 100 mM Ca2+ was greater for mnemiopsin-2 than for mnemiopsin-1 . Over two decades ago, it was suggested that some of the aequorin isoforms may actually represent different gene products . The sequencing of the Mnemiopsis genome offers the first definitive evidence that all of the different photoprotein isoforms are indeed products of different (or separate) individual genes. Furthermore, these data allow for an examination of the genomic organization of these photoprotein genes.
The evolutionary history of the photoprotein gene family has not been systematically characterized to date. Previous studies have explored photoprotein phylogenetic relationships within jellyfish (hydromedusan) species , comparing both their sequences and structures . Recently, Aghamaali et al.  performed sequence comparisons of ctenophore and hydromedusae photoproteins. However, no investigations have gone beyond the hydromedusan and ctenophoran representatives, potentially obscuring the evolutionary history of this gene family by omitting sequences from other phyla. Here, we have combined all publicly available photoprotein sequence data with the new set of Mnemiopsis photoprotein sequences generated through our whole-genome sequencing project , as well as with photoprotein-like sequences we identified through bioinformatic searches of genomes of additional non-bilaterian taxa, to reconstruct the phylogeny of this gene family. This approach allowed us to determine when the origin of the gene family occurred in relation to the emergence of the metazoa, and, for the first time, to demonstrate its presence in non-bioluminescent organisms.
Nearly all ctenophores are capable of bioluminescence , producing flashes of light in light-producing cells (photocytes) upon stimulation in dark conditions. Interestingly, comb plate cilia diffract light to produce a rainbow of colors and give ctenophores their characteristic iridescent appearance , which is often mistaken for bioluminescence. The literature regarding bioluminescence in Mnemiopsis dates back to at least the early 20th century [35, 36]. In Mnemiopsis, light production is confined to photocytes, which are associated with the eight meridional canals underlying the longitudinal comb rows and where they extend onto the lobes. Waves of luminescence can propagate in either direction from the point of the stimulation [35, 37, 38]. The distribution of photocytes within the meridional canals is asymmetric and discontinuous; photocytes are only found on one side of each canal adjacent to the minor body axes, on the same side as the testes, but not on the side containing the ovaries . During gamete differentiation and embryonic development, light production is first detected in eggs , and again at a stage during embryonic development that is closely correlated with the initiation of comb plate growth, approximately 8 h post-fertilization (hpf) .
One property of ctenophore photoproteins that distinguishes them from hydromedusan photoproteins is that they are photoinhibited upon light exposure [40–42]. This phenomenon is reversible in vivo by returning animals to the dark, but photoinhibition of photoprotein extracts cannot be reversed in the same way. The inhibition has been shown to destroy the intermediate photoprotein complex but does not result in the release of oxygen . Several investigators have suggested that the luminescent response to electrical or mechanical stimulation in Mnemiopsis involves a nerve net [36, 37, 43], and that luminescence is neurally controlled [39, 44].
In this study, we used a model ctenophore species to investigate the evolutionary history, genomic organization, and developmental expression patterns of the photoproteins - a gene family that represents a special class of luciferases involved in bioluminescence emission. In a similar manner, we explored the Mnemiopsis opsins - genes involved in light sensing. By virtue of its early-branching position on the animal tree, Mnemiopsis provides a valuable perspective on the evolution and function of gene families and cell types in early animals. Our observation of co-expression of opsin and photoprotein genes in developing ctenophore photocytes led us to hypothesize a dual role for Mnemiopsis photocytes in light sensing and light production. Bioluminescence by bacterial symbionts (reviewed by ) and host squid gene expression of phototransduction cascade genes  have been shown to occur together in the squid light organ. Tong et al.  hypothesize that the two phenomena are functionally linked in the light organ in that system. Although there is no microbial involvement in the ctenophore luminescence system, our results led us to hypothesize a similar dual role for photocytes in both light production and light sensing in Mnemiopsis.
Results and discussion
Ten photoproteins are located in two tandemly arrayed clusters in the Mnemiopsisgenome
The availability of the whole genome sequence of Mnemiopsis provided us an opportunity to examine the genomic content and context of the luciferases involved in bioluminescence in an early diverging metazoan phylum. This is the first genome available for any species known to utilize calcium-regulated photoproteins for bioluminescence, and, to our knowledge, the first genomic sequence from any bioluminescent animal. We identified 10 photoprotein genes in the Mnemiopsis genome organized in two clusters and comprising three sequence similarity groups (A, B, and C; Figure 1). All predicted photoproteins are single exon genes. In some cases, putative photoprotein genes were mispredicted or missed entirely in our original set of predicted gene models. In these cases, we made adjustments based on manual curation and then updated the set of gene models. Rather than adopt the traditional naming scheme for these genes (that is, mnemiopsin), we propose to name them MleiPP1 through MleiPP10 (where 'Mlei' is a combination of the genus and species names, and 'PP' stands for photoprotein). We opted for this naming scheme to clearly convey the function of the protein, as well as to avoid confusion with the names previously used for photoproteins from Mnemiopsis - specifically, those used for purified proteins mnemiopsin-1 and -2  and cloned genes mnemiopsin 1 and 2 , which may or may not correspond directly with the purified proteins of the same name. This new naming scheme will also serve to avoid any confusion between mnemiopsins and the Mnemiopsis opsin genes discussed in this paper. Furthermore, none of the 10 photoproteins were exact nucleotide matches to mnemiopsin 1 or 2 from Jafarian et al. . Mnemiopsin 1 is most similar to MleiPP1 (98.5% nucleotide identity (612 out of 621 bp)). Mnemiopsin 2 is most similar to MleiPP5 (97.3% nucleotide identity (607 out of 624 bp)). The 10 sequences have been deposited [GenBank:JQ724636-JQ724645]. They also have been assigned identifiers specific to the Mnemiopsis Genome Project (MleiPP1-10: ML085715b, ML085730b, ML085731a, ML085732b, ML085733a, ML085734b, ML085741b, ML215420b, ML215421a, ML215422b).
One cluster of photoprotein genes located on genomic scaffold ML0857 [GenBank:JH153500.1] includes seven full-length predicted genes, with six found in tandem in a head-to-tail orientation (Figure 1). These six genes are spaced at regular intervals (average 463.6 ±13.5 bp intergenic sequence). There are also two partial photoprotein gene predictions (incomplete gene fragments) on ML0857, each containing a gap in the scaffold where sequence is missing between two contigs joined in the draft assembly. These two partial predictions are located in tandem with a seventh full-length photoprotein gene on ML0857 (MleiPP1). A second cluster located on scaffold ML2154 [GenBank:JH154797.1] has three full-length photoprotein genes found in tandem, also with head-to-tail orientation and regular spacing (average 428 ± 8.5 bp intergenic sequence) (Figure 1). There is one partial predicted photoprotein gene on ML2154 that is located directly next to MleiPP10. A third scaffold, ML3841 [GenBank:JH156484.1], had one full-length photoprotein gene plus three partial predictions. A fourth scaffold, ML3423 [GenBank:JH156066.1], had one partial prediction. The predictions on ML3841 and ML3423 have very high sequence similarity to the genes on ML2154. The short length of these scaffolds (ML3841 is 4,191 bp; ML3423 is 1,704 bp) and the sequence similarity with genes on ML2154 strongly suggested that these sequences should be assembled with ML2154. When the individual sequence reads used to assemble ML3841 and ML3423 were analyzed manually using Consed (see Methods), we found multiple reads that had sequence exactly matching that on ML2154. We concluded that these scaffolds represent misassemblies by the Phusion assembler and that they should, in fact, be assembled with scaffold ML2154. Thus, we did not include sequences from ML3841 or ML3423 in any further analyses and have not included them in Figure 1.
Confirmation of individual Mnemiopsisphotoprotein sequences
Misassemblies of genomic scaffolds can result from the presence of multiple copies of closely related repetitive sequences that inappropriately collapse onto one or a few regions . Alternatively, false gene duplications or expansions can also occur due to assembly errors . Because of the complex nature of assembling genomic regions with a high level of repetitive sequence, as seen in the photoprotein gene clusters, we chose to confirm the presence of individual photoprotein genes using two complementary approaches: a 5' and 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR (RACE-PCR) screen; and a manual inspection of the individual sequence reads used to assemble each photoprotein gene in the genome. Alignments of the sequences obtained from the 5'-RACE-PCR screen (including UTR sequence) with the predicted photoprotein genomic sequence successfully confirmed seven out of ten of the predicted full-length photoprotein genes on ML0857 and ML2154 (Figure 1). The 3'-RACE-PCR screen confirmed one full-length photoprotein gene on ML2154 and one partial photoprotein gene on ML2154. Overall, the RACE-PCR screening approach confirmed eight of ten (80%) full-length photoprotein genes and one of three (33%) partial photoprotein genes predicted from the draft assembly. This gave us confidence that most of the identified photoprotein genes are not only present but are also transcribed in Mnemiopsis, indicating that they are likely functional genes. We suspect that the partial photoprotein genes are likely full-length genes, but that the full sequence cannot be determined from the current data. Further refinements of the draft assembly and targeted re-sequencing may help to determine the full-length sequence of these partial photoprotein genes. Another result obtained from both the RACE-PCR screen and the manual inspection was that two predicted full-length photoprotein genes (MleiPP8 and MleiPP10), which had single nucleotide deletions leading to frame shifts in the draft assembly, have been correctly annotated, confirming that they are full-length photoprotein genes rather than pseudogenes. Another predicted gene that contained a 7 bp sequence gap in the draft assembly (MleiPP7) was finished using data from both the RACE-PCR screen and the manual inspection, confirming another full-length photoprotein gene.
The manual inspection of the assembly confirmed that there was evidence (multiple high quality reads) supporting all 10 of the predicted photoprotein genes, therefore confirming 10 out of 10 full-length genes. Examining the individual reads also allowed us to identify polymorphic sites within each predicted protein that represent allelic variants of each (data not shown). In a few cases, examination of the flanking region surrounding photoprotein genes indicated high levels of variation beyond what would be expected for allelic variants, suggesting that there may be some photoprotein sequences that have been inappropriately collapsed into a single region. This is why we have chosen to report that there are 'at least' 10 full-length photoprotein genes in Mnemiopsis.
We hypothesize that clusters of photoprotein genes allow Mnemiopsis to quickly produce and maintain a large quantity of photoprotein (and thus light, as long as luciferin is not limiting) by producing transcripts at a faster rate. Observations of Mnemiopsis indicate that, unlike in most bioluminescent systems, it is difficult to exhaust the capacity of whole animals for light production by continuous stimulation . In addition, it has been noted that, as the frequency of stimulation is increased, total light production by Mnemiopsis does not decrease . These observations led Chang  to conclude that '[t]his probably indicates that photogenic material is continuously being produced.' This could easily be achieved by having multiple functional photoproteins encoded within the Mnemiopsis genome, as described above.
Green fluorescent protein is not present in the Mnemiopsisgenome
Calcium-activated photoproteins are often co-localized in photocytes with GFP family members, such as in Aequorea and Obelia , allowing the wavelength of bioluminescent light emission to be shifted from blue to green. Photocytes themselves can also be autofluorescent, partially due to blue fluorescence in the spent photoprotein [50, 51]. The autofluorescence is different from the fluorescence of GFP, which has not been observed in Mnemiopsis . We performed several BLAST searches with various GFP query sequences but did not find evidence for any GFP homologs in the Mnemiopsis genome. This is consistent with previous evidence that Mnemiopsis is not fluorescent and that its bioluminescence emission spectrum shows no sign of characteristic GFP-type emission.
Sequence analysis of the Mnemiopsisphotoproteins
Each of the 10 Mnemiopsis photoproteins are 206 or 207 amino acids in length. We generated a table of percentage amino acid sequence identity and similarity among full-length photoproteins and their close homologs (Additional file 1). Among Mnemiopsis photoproteins, there is 87% to 100% protein sequence identity. Mnemiopsis photoproteins share 85% to 91% sequence identity with other ctenophore photoproteins (Beroe and Bolinopsis). Ctenophore photoproteins share just 21% to 24% sequence identity and 41% to 46% sequence similarity with known hydromedusan cnidarian photoproteins. Within all hydromedusan photoproteins there is 60% to 94% sequence identity. We identified two photoprotein-like sequences in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis (NvecPP1, GenBank:XM_001639610 and NvecPP2, GenBank:XM_001639611), which code for proteins that share 25% to 27% amino acid sequence identity with ctenophore photoproteins and 20% to 23% amino acid sequence identity with hydromedusan photoproteins. We identified four photoprotein-like sequences in the poriferan Amphimedon queenslandica (AquePP1-AquePP4; JGI ID:Aqu1.225927, Aqu1.223059, Aqu1.223058, Aqu1.222695), which code for proteins that share 15% to 25% amino acid sequence identity with ctenophore photoproteins and 16% to 27% amino acid sequence identity with hydromedusan photoproteins. The predicted molecular weight for the Mnemiopsis photoproteins ranges from 24.56 to 24.76 kDa and the predicted isoelectric point for this set of proteins ranges from pH 4.57 to 4.82 (Additional file 2).
An alignment of photoproteins from hydromedusan cnidarians and ctenophores reveals several regions of sequence similarity (Figure 2). Specific residues that make up the coelenterazine binding cavity and the EF-hand domains (including the 12-residue calcium binding loops and the main loop ligand residues that coordinate calcium binding) are noted on the alignment. Within the MleiPPs, there is conservation of nearly all of these key functional residues, with a few notable exceptions. One interesting substitution in EF-hand I of all Sequence Group B sequences (noted by Jafarian et al.  for mnemiopsin 2) is a glutamic acid residue at residue 6 of the loop instead of the conserved glycine that is found in this position in each of the EF-hands of all other photoproteins. Also, compared with other Mnemiopsis photoproteins, Sequence Group C has a substitution in residue 7 of EF-hand IV (alanine instead of lysine), indicating that this calcium coordinating position may tolerate this substitution without significantly disrupting function. Other differences in key residues between Mnemiopsis sequence groups are either conservative substitutions that are likely to retain function or are also seen in hydromedusan photoproteins (for example, residue 7 of EF-hand I).
Comparing hydromedusae and ctenophore photoprotein protein sequences, similarity is especially high within the three EF-hand domains (Figure 2). At the N-terminus, there are two regions where the ctenophore photoproteins have insertions of six to nine amino acids relative to the hydromedusae photoproteins. There are several differences in important functional residues, especially in residues that make up the coelenterazine binding cavity, between the two groups of photoproteins, which have been previously discussed . These amino acid substitutions may be partially responsible for the functional differences seen between the two groups, such as the property of photoinactivation present in ctenophore photoproteins but not in hydromedusae photoproteins. Future studies that examine functional and structural differences among photoproteins will help confirm what effect these and other residues have on function and determine what makes these two groups distinct.
dN/dS analyses indicate strong purifying selection is acting on Mnemiopsisphotoprotein genes
dN/dS analyses compare the rate of substitutions at synonymous (silent) sites (dS) to the rate of substitutions at nonsynonymous sites (dN) between a pair of coding sequences, and are used to examine rates of sequence evolution for evidence of natural selection at the molecular level . If the dN/dS rate ratio is <1, there is evidence for purifying (negative) selection, and the duplicated genes are thought to be under selective constraint. Furthermore, the smaller the dN/dS ratio, the greater the selective constraint under which the two genes have evolved. The rate of nonsynonymous substitution is generally much lower than that of synonymous substitution because changes at coding sites are often constrained, as they may alter protein function . We performed a maximum likelihood estimation of pairwise dN/dS ratios for all Mnemiopsis photoprotein gene pairs. For these genes, the ratios range from 0.0184 to 0.1691 (Table 1), indicating that strong purifying (negative) selection is acting on these sequences and that the function of the duplicated gene copies is being selectively maintained.
Evidence of concerted evolution within the Mnemiopsisphotoprotein family
The evolution of multigene families can be explained by different models, including birth-and-death evolution and concerted evolution . In birth-and-death evolution, new genes are created by gene duplication, with some duplicate genes remaining in the genome, whereas others are inactivated (converted to pseudogenes) or deleted from the genome outright. In concerted evolution, all family member genes evolve as a unit. A mutation occurring in a repeat spreads throughout family members via recombination events such as unequal crossover or gene conversion. The evolution of tandemly arrayed multigene families has often been attributed to concerted evolution. Current evidence supports this evolutionary model for some families, including many RNA genes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, but in others, new analyses have shown that they are subject to birth-and-death evolution with strong purifying selection (for example, histone genes); still others are subject to a mixed process of concerted and birth-and-death evolution (for example, alpha-like globins) .
We tested the Mnemiopsis photoproteins for evidence of recombination events indicative of concerted evolution using GENECONV and found some evidence to support this model - namely, nine pairs of sequences on scaffold ML0857 with evidence for recombination from a global comparison of fragments (Additional file 3). The top three resulting pairs (MleiPP3 and MleiPP6; MleiPP5 and MleiPP7; and MleiPP2 and MleiPP7) are all within-sequence group pairs that have global permutation-test P-values and global Bonferroni-corrected Karlin-Altschul P-values <0.05. Our results suggest that the high level of sequence conservation in this multigene family is likely maintained through a combination of strong purifying selection and mechanisms of concerted evolution, though further analysis will be required to determine the relative contribution of each process.
Analysis of photoprotein-like genes in the genomes of Amphimedon and Nematostella
We aligned the EF-hand domains coded by ctenophore, anthozoan cnidarian (Nematostella), hydrozoan cnidarian, and poriferan (Amphimedon) photoprotein and photoprotein-like genes (Additional file 4). We analyzed the two Nematostella photoprotein-like sequences and found that some key residues have been substituted that likely disrupt calcium binding and, presumably, any ability to function as a luciferase. In the calcium-binding loop of EF-hand I, the first aspartic acid (loop position 1) has been replaced with a valine in both sequences. In EF-hand IV, the second aspartic acid (loop position 3) in the calcium-binding loop has been replaced with a lysine in both Nematostella sequences. These substitutions are not conservative and may be disruptive enough to prevent calcium from binding to these proteins. In fact, HMMER searches of the Pfam and SMART databases do not predict the presence of EF-hand IV in the Nematostella sequences, likely due to the disruptive substitution we identified in this domain.
We also analyzed the four Amphimedon (poriferan) sequences and found that none of the key residues in the calcium binding loops have major substitutions (Additional file 4). This suggests that these sponge proteins may have retained a calcium binding function, although the ability to produce visible light may not be intact given that there are no reports of light production from this species. In EF-hand I, a glutamic acid residue replaces the final aspartic acid (loop position 12) in three Amphimedon sequences. This is, however, a very conservative substitution, as both aspartic acid and glutamic acid have acidic side chains, and thus would probably not significantly disrupt calcium binding. HMMER searches of Pfam successfully identify EF-hands I, III, and IV in all four Amphimedon photoprotein-like sequences. Aque_PP2 has some minor differences compared with the other sponge proteins in key binding loop residues, but all of the residues that are substituted are found in at least one other functional photoprotein (Additional file 4).
Although we found that Amphimedon has four photoprotein gene homologs, visible bioluminescence has not been substantiated for that or any other sponge . Ultra-weak luminescence has been reported for Suberites domuncula and that species also possesses an acyl-coenzyme A synthetase gene, which is similar to firefly luciferase . However, this series of findings is not conclusive evidence of a functional bioluminescence system in Porifera, using either coelenterate- or firefly-type luciferin. Bioluminescence has also not been observed in the cnidarian Nematostella, yet we found that these organisms have photoprotein-like genes. There are at least three possible scenarios that might explain their existence in these organisms: these are functional photoprotein genes that are either rarely utilized or are used at stages or in situations that have not been witnessed by researchers; these genes encode calcium-binding proteins with functions not involved in bioluminescence; or they represent a kind of evolutionary intermediate or 'proto-photoprotein' that does not have all of the structural machinery in place to allow the protein to properly fold or coordinate calcium ion binding. In the case of the two Nematostella genes, there are substitutions in the EF-hand domains that make it unlikely that they can properly bind calcium. In the case of Amphimedon, it is possible that the genes encode functional photoproteins, but that these gene products are ultimately inactive because Amphimedon may not synthesize coelenterazine or obtain coelenterazine from its diet. This hypothesis could be tested by performing a luciferase activity assay on the purified proteins.
Nematostellaphotoprotein-like mRNA expression
In situ hybridizations of two photoprotein-like genes from Nematostella during a series of developmental stages reveal a pattern of mainly endodermal expression, with a specific region of endodermal expression in the tips of budding tentacles through the six-tentacle stage (Additional file 5). The expression pattern of the two genes is not entirely overlapping. For example, NvecPP2 has a diffuse pattern of expression in the endoderm in the larval stage (Additional file 5, Panel A), whereas the corresponding pattern for NvecPP1 shows a distinct endodermal expression pattern in the developing tentacle buds (Additional file 5, Panel B). Additionally, for NvecPP2 only, at the six-tentacle stage, there is some expression in the basal disc of the anemone. Given that Nematostella does not exhibit bioluminescence, this pattern may indicate that these genes acquired a role in development. It would be informative to look at the expression pattern of the Amphimedon genes during various life stages as well, given that there is evidence in publicly available EST sequences (EST Database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)) that all four Amphimedon photoprotein-like genes are expressed during the larval stage. Expression patterns may help to narrow down possible functions for these proteins.
Analysis of three putative Mnemiopsisopsins
We identified three putative Mnemiopsis opsin genes. These sequences were named MleiOpsin1 to MleiOpsin3 and have been deposited [GenBank:JQ724646-JQ724648]. They also have been given identifiers specific to the Mnemiopsis Genome Project (MleiOpsin1 to 3: ML13055a, ML12047a, ML215412a). The protein encoded by MleiOpsin1 is 345 amino acids in length and the gene is comprised of eight exons. The protein encoded by MleiOpsin2 is 400 amino acids in length and the gene has 11 exons. The protein encoded by MleiOpsin3 is 404 amino acids in length and the gene has seven exons. Full-length cDNA sequences of the ORFs of MleiOpsin1 and MleiOpsin2 were extended by RACE-PCR. We generated a table of percentage amino acid sequence identity and similarity among the Mnemiopsis opsins and their close homologs based on the transmembrane region alignment (Additional file 6). The Mnemiopsis opsins share 17% to 36% amino acid identity and 38% to 59% amino acid similarity. MleiOpsin1 shares the highest percent identity with an opsin from Pleurobrachia pileus, another ctenophore species (PpilOpsin1, 37%, based on truncated sequence; see Additional file 6). MleiOpsin2 shares the highest percent identity with PpilOpsin2 (48%). MleiOpsin3 shares the highest percent identity with human peropsin (21%).
We analyzed MleiOpsins1 to 3 in relation to several residues known to be important to opsin function and found that MleiOpsin2 has retained all but two of these important amino acids, while MleiOpsin1 and 3 have additional substitutions (Additional file 7). Lys296 is a residue that serves as the site for the Schiff base linkage with the chromophore and is conserved in all known opsins, including MleiOpsins1 to 3. The counterion is a key functional residue within the opsin family, responsible for stabilizing the inactive dark state pigment by helping to stabilize the protonated Schiff base and tuning the wavelength absorbance into the visible spectrum . The counterion is usually Glu113 (sometimes Asp113) in vertebrate visual and non-visual opsins and Glu181 in many other opsins. Interestingly, in MleiOpsins1 and 2, there is a Glu in both positions, suggesting that the ancestral metazoan opsin may have had a Glu at both positions. In MleiOpsin3, Glu is retained only in position 181, suggesting that, if functional, this protein may have the ability to stabilize the protonated Schiff base through this position. A disulfide bond, conserved in most G-protein coupled receptors, normally found at residues Cys110 and Cys187, is not present in MleiOpsins 1 to 3, presenting the possibility that either the proteins can fold and function properly without this conserved bond, or that their function is disrupted due to the substitution of these residues. Finally, conserved motif Glu134-Arg135-Tyr136, involved in the propagation of the transduction signal once a photon has been absorbed, is retained in MleiOpsin2, partially substituted to Glu-Gln-Tyr in MleiOpsin1 and fully substituted to Arg-Arg-Ala in MleiOpsin3. Overall, MleiOpsin2 has retained many conserved functional residues and has the greatest potential to be a functional opsin. This is further substantiated by the cloning and characterization of MleiOpsin2 (see the section on Opsin protein expression and characterization).
Phototransduction pathway components are present in Mnemiopsis
Ciliary photoreceptors (typically associated with vertebrates) employ a phototransduction cascade that includes ciliary opsins, Gi/Gt proteins, phosphodiesterase, and cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels, whereas rhabdomeric photoreceptors (typically associated with invertebrates) utilize a cascade involving rhabdomeric opsins, G-protein alpha-q, phospholipase C, and transient receptor potential ion channels. Both cascades can be deactivated by arrestin and rhodopsin kinase, and regenerated by retinal binding protein. We searched for and identified putative homologs to several ciliary and rhabdomeric phototransduction pathway proteins  in the Mnemiopsis genome (Table 2). These sequences have been deposited into GenBank [GenBank:JQ724649-JQ724657, JX564543-JX564553]. The Mnemiopsis homologs had BLAST hits to query sequences with significant E-values (Table 2). Their reciprocal best BLAST hits were to proteins with annotations that closely correspond to the query proteins in nearly all cases. Exceptions include a guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein specific to the ciliary pathway (G-alpha-t), which resulted in a top hit of G(i) subunit alpha-2; the guanylyl cyclase GC-E precursor, which gave a top hit of a natriuretic peptide receptor; and retinal-binding protein, which gave a top hit to a SEC14-like protein. Overall, these results indicate that components comprising a complete ciliary phototransduction cascade are present in Mnemiopsis. In addition, assembled RNA-seq transcript data available through the Mnemiopsis Genome Project Web site  via the 'CL' (Cufflinks) track on the Mnemiopsis genome browser support the developmental mRNA expression of all but two of the identified sequences (Table 2).
Ciliary phototransduction is more likely than rhabdomeric in Mnemiopsis because the putative photoreceptors in the apical sensory organ of ctenophores have a ciliary morphology , cyclic nucleotide gated ion channels (used in ciliary phototransduction) are the probable ancestral ion channels , and rhabdomeric phototransduction seems to have evolved with the emergence of bilaterians . It would be interesting to determine the organismal function for the rhabdomeric phototransduction cascade components (G-protein alpha-q, phospholipase C and transient receptor potential ion channel genes) that we identified in the Mnemiopsis genome, and to determine if the rhabdomeric line of photoreceptor evolution also dates back to early metazoans. Although we have RNA-seq-based evidence that these genes are expressed during embryonic development, we do not know if their expression is limited to the photocytes and/or the four putative photoreceptors in the apical sense organ. Future studies that explore the expression patterns of these genes will help verify whether a phototransduction pathway is functioning in these specific regions and whether it is specific to ciliary components. Further analysis of the phototransduction pathway genes in this early branching metazoan will help shed light on the origin of these pathways and their function in a non-bilaterian animal.
Metazoan phylogeny of photoproteins
The phylogeny based on full-length photoprotein amino acid sequence alignments yielded four major groups in a well-supported clade - specifically, ctenophoran, anthozoan cnidarian, hydrozoan cnidarian, and poriferan groups (Figure 3). Related proteins, including functionally related coelenterazine-binding proteins from Renilla (an anthozoan cnidarian), form a sister group to this clade. A sarcoplasmic calcium binding protein from the marine worm Nereis diversicolor (Nd_SARC in Figure 3) branches just outside the Renilla coelenterazine-binding proteins group. Other sarcoplasmic calcium binding proteins from a variety of taxa, as well as calmodulin proteins from various taxa (including metazoan outgroup taxa Capsaspora, Monosiga, and Salpingoeca, and non-bilaterian metazoan taxa Amphimedon, Mnemiopsis, Nematostella, Hydra, Renilla, and Trichoplax), form their own groups outside of this clade (Figure 3). The difference in likelihood values among resulting trees from the multiple runs was very small, indicating that our methods produced several nearly equally likely trees. The relationships presented in Figure 3 are maintained in the 50% majority rule consensus tree of all of the result trees (Additional file 8).
Interestingly, the cnidarian photoproteins are not monophyletic; the two Nematostella photoprotein-like genes branch next to the ctenophore photoproteins with moderately high support (83%), followed by the hydrozoan group and then by the four Amphimedon photoprotein-like genes, which fall at the base of all of the other photoprotein and photoprotein-like groups with low support (61%). It is not unusual for trees based on single genes to form clusters that are incongruous with taxonomy because of selection acting on a single locus, the presence of homoplasic characters, incomplete lineage sorting, or as a result of long-branch attraction [59, 60].
Within the ctenophore photoproteins, the Mnemiopsis sequences do not form a monophyletic group (Figure 3). All sequences from scaffold ML0857 group together, with ML0857 Group A forming one subgroup (72% bootstrap) and ML0857 Group B branching in a ladder-like fashion from the A subgroup. The sequence from Beroe branches next to the Mnemiopsis ML0857 cluster with low support, followed by two sequences from Bolinopsis. The Mnemiopsis photoproteins on scaffold ML2154 form a subgroup (Group C) at the base of all of the other ctenophore photoproteins with 94% support. Bioluminescence is widespread among ctenophores , however, since genomic data are not yet available for any other ctenophore species, it remains to be seen if tandemly arrayed clusters of photoprotein genes will be identified in other ctenophores. The availability of genomes or transcriptomes from additional species will provide the basis for a more complete understanding of photoprotein evolution within the Ctenophora. We also note that the ctenophore photoproteins are quite distinct from the hydromedusae photoproteins. Our phylogenetic tree separates these two groups into distinct clusters; however, the groups are clearly evolutionarily related compared with other calcium-binding proteins, indicating that there may have been relatively rapid diversification of these proteins in the time since ctenophores and cnidarians diverged (Figure 3).
Photoproteins arose at the base of the Metazoa
Searches of the recently sequenced genomes of unicellular eukaryotes (filozoans), including Monosiga brevicollis and Salpingoeca rosetta (choanoflagellates), and Capsaspora owczarzaki (a filasterean), did not reveal any photoprotein genes. However, BLAST searches revealed that homologs to other EF-hand superfamily proteins are present in the genomes of these groups, including calmodulin (shown in Figure 3), centrin or caltractin, myosin, calcineurin, spectrin, and actinin (data not shown). We found that photoproteins are altogether absent from the placozoan Trichoplax. Photoproteins are known to be present in many hydrozoan cnidarians in the Orders Leptothecatae, Trachymedusae, Narcomedusae, and Siphonophorae, but it appears that they have been lost from another hydrozoan, Hydra (Order Anthoathecatae). Because photoproteins or photoprotein-like genes are present in the earliest branching groups (that is, sponges and ctenophores) on the animal tree of life, and not in their closest non-metazoan relatives, we infer that the origin of the gene family was at the base of the Metazoa, followed by lineage-specific losses in Trichoplax and Hydra (Figure 4). This conclusion is based on currently available sequence data and should be revisited when sequence data become available for additional bioluminescent non-metazoan eukaryotes, such as radiolarians, which may have homologous calcium-activated photoproteins .
Opsin phylogeny reconstructs a ctenophore-specific clade
We identified six major groupings in the opsin phylogeny we reconstructed (Figure 5), which was based on an alignment of the seven-transmembrane (7TM) region of opsin sequences from a variety of taxa (alignment with a subset of taxa shown in Additional file 7). Two putative Mnemiopsis opsin sequences (MleiOpsin1 and MleiOpsin2) form a well-supported clade (99% bootstrap) with opsins from the ctenophore Pleurobrachia, falling outside of the well-defined ciliary, rhabdomeric, and Go-coupled plus retinochrome, retinal G protein-coupled receptor (Go/RGR) groupings of bilaterians. The ctenophore-specific clade branches closer to the ciliary-opsin and Go/RGR groups than to the rhabdomeric-opsins. A third putative Mnemiopsis opsin (MleiOpsin3) does not group with the other ctenophore opsins, and instead branches on its own at the base of all opsins with low support. The leaf stability index (0.421) and branch attachment frequency value (0.30) are both very low for this branch, further supporting the uncertainty of the placement of this sequence in our phylogeny. Cnidarian opsins, represented by 14 Nematostella sequences, are found in three major groupings: a subgroup that falls next to the Go/RGR group; a group with seven Nematostella sequences that branches next to the ctenophore-specific clade; and a group with two Nematostella sequences that branches outside all opsins other than MleiOpsin3. Likelihood values among resulting trees from the multiple runs were all very similar, indicating that our methods produced several equally likely trees. The relationships presented in Figure 5 are maintained in the 50% majority rule consensus tree of all of the result trees (Additional file 9). We also repeated the analysis after removing MleiOpsin3 and all of the groupings and relationships among the groups remained the same (Additional file 10).
The major clades identified in our opsin tree are in agreement with results seen in recent studies [62–64] where cnidarian opsins occur in multiple locations across the tree. One recent study by Porter and colleagues did not obtain this result, instead finding that all cnidarian and one ctenophore opsin (PpilOpsin1) form a monophyletic clade referred to as Cnidops . In that study, only three Nematostella sequences (all from the same subclade, with no representatives from the other two previously reported subclades) and a single ctenophore sequence were included in the analysis; by contrast, 14 Nematostella and four ctenophore sequences were included in our own analysis. The Porter study also included several putative opsin sequences from the cnidarian Hydra that we did not include in our analysis due to the extraordinarily long branches produced by these sequences during our preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Additionally, the single ctenophore sequence included in that study (PpilOpsin1) was derived from EST data and is truncated. These differences could explain why the branching pattern seen in Porter et al.  differs from the position seen in our own tree. Overall, the phylogeny we reconstructed does not suggest a simple one-to-one correlation between the non-bilaterian (ctenophore and cnidarian) opsin groups and the well-defined bilaterian groups. With the addition of the ctenophore sequences to the opsin phylogeny, the evolutionary path leading from prebilaterian opsins to the bilaterian ciliary, rhabdomeric, and Go/RGR opsins remains unresolved, and it appears that additional sequence data will be required to fully resolve these relationships.
Mnemiopsisphotoprotein expression and spectral analysis
We expressed, purified, and characterized a subset of the Mnemiopsis photoproteins that included one protein from each sequence group: MleiPP6 (Group A), MleiPP3 (Group B), and MleiPP9 (Group C). The emission wavelength maximum (λmax) at pH 8.0 for MleiPP6 and MleiPP3 was 490 nm and for MleiPP9 was 496 nm. All emission wavelengths were maintained within 1 nm at pH 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0 (Figure 6) for each protein. Although noteworthy, the slightly longer emission maximum for the Group C photoproteins would likely not have a functional impact on any organism detecting the luminescence. These values are slightly shifted from the in vitro value of mnemiopsin-1 and mnemiopsin-2 presented by Ward and Seliger  of 485 nm, which were determined at pH 8.4 and pH 8.3 respectively. This could be due to differences in pH and the purification methods used between the two studies. Although we only expressed three of the MleiPPs, it is likely that all 10 are functional, considering the very high amino acid identity present within each sequence group and, in particular, the conservation of key functional residues across all Mnemiopsis photoproteins. Although Group B sequences have a substitution in an important residue in EF-hand I, we show that one member of this group, MleiPP3, is a functional photoprotein, so it is likely that this substitution does not disrupt function in the other Group B proteins.
Mnemiopsisopsin protein expression and characterization
We purified and determined the absorption spectrum of MleiOpsin2 bound to 11-cis-retinal. The wavelengths of maximal absorption (λmax) of the resulting visual pigment were measured from the dark spectrum and dark-light difference spectrum (Figure 7). This protein has an absorption peak at 501 ± 1 nm (Figure 7). When the regenerated pigment was exposed to light, it showed a new absorbance spectrum peak at around 380 nm (data not shown), indicating that 11-cis-retinal in the pigment was isomerized by light and all-trans-retinal was released. These results indicate that MleiOpsin2 is able to form a functional photopigment. The absorption spectrum overlaps with the emission spectrum of the photoproteins (Figure 6), suggesting that the opsin could function to absorb light produced by the ctenophore. Further experimentation will be necessary to rigorously test this hypothesis.
Mnemiopsisphotoprotein mRNA expression
We examined mRNA expression patterns of Mnemiopsis photoprotein genes through embryonic development by in situ hybridization. We used probes generated from each of the photoprotein sequence groups (A, B, and C); because the patterns were identical for all three probes, representative patterns are shown in Figure 8. Photoprotein expression begins during late gastrulation (4 to 6 hpf) in migrating photocyte precursors (Figure 8A, panels A-D, G-J) and continues in cells associated with the endodermal meridional canals beneath the developing comb plates where photocytes are located (Figure 8A, panels E-F, K-L). Expression coincides closely with the onset of light emission in developing photocytes, which starts around 8 hpf.
Although three separate probes were designed from the photoprotein sequences (one for each sequence group), identical expression patterns were observed from each probe. This could be due to true co-expression or may have resulted from the probes cross-hybridizing with multiple transcripts, given that the sequence is so similar among the photoproteins. The pattern of expression of Mnemiopsis photoproteins matches the site of light production in developing embryos, which begin to emit light in these same regions upon stimulation starting around 8 hpf , although mRNA expression is first detected at 4 hpf.
Mnemiopsisopsin mRNA expression
Expression of two opsin homologs (MleiOpsin1 and MleiOpsin2) was detected in migrating photocyte precursors (MleiOpsin1) and in developing photocytes at 18 hpf (MleiOpsin2). MleiOpsin1 exhibits expression early in development that looks strikingly similar to the photoprotein expression pattern (Figure 8B, panels A-C, F-H), although it is not as strong or well-defined as the photoprotein expression pattern itself. Expression of MleiOpsin1 continues into the cydippid stage, where it is weakly expressed in photocytes (Figure 8B, panels D and I). MlOpsin2 is not expressed in early developmental stages (data not shown), but exhibits strong expression in photocytes that overlaps with photoprotein expression at the cydippid stage (Figure 8B, panels K and M, white arrows). At about 18 hpf, MleiOpsin2 expression is also found in four small groups of neural cells in the floor of the apical organ (Figure 8B, panels L and N, black arrows). These groups of neural cells coincide with structures described as lamellate bodies that were suggested over 130 years ago to be photoreceptors [56, 66]. MleiOpsin1 is expressed in the apical sense organ at the cydippid stage as well, although it is not as well defined (Figure 8B, panels E and J). We did not examine expression patterns of MleiOpsin3. Overall, these patterns suggest that there are photoreceptors located in the apical sense organ and that photocytes may also function as photoreceptors in this species.
Mnemiopsisphotoprotein and opsin mRNA co-expression in photocytes
Double in situ hybridization of photoprotein MleiPP1 and MleiOpsin2 shows a clearly overlapping expression pattern (Figure 9A,B). Reflective confocal microscopy of the same double in situ specimen (18 hpf) demonstrates that the MleiOpsin2 expression is punctate and is located within the same photocyte cells exhibiting photoprotein expression (Figure 9C). This pattern lends support for the hypothesis that photocytes function in bioluminescence and photoreception.
Light responses in Mnemiopsis
Previous research has examined responses to light in Mnemiopsis, and there is some experimental evidence that light influences its spawning behavior. Under natural conditions, spawning normally occurs approximately 8 h after sunset in specimens collected in Woods Hole, MA, USA  and 3 to 5 h after onset of darkness in specimens collected in Miami, FL, USA [68, 69], with the Miami specimens representing a genetically distinct population . Thus, the signal to spawn corresponds to the absence of light or onset of darkness and may be temperature dependent. It is unclear, however, if Mnemiopsis exhibits phototactic behavior at any life stage (, KP, personal observation). The organismal function(s) of opsin-mediated phototransduction likely to occur in the photoreceptors of the apical sense organ and in the photocytes remains to be determined through experimentation.
Do ctenophore photocytes have a dual role in light production and light sensing?
The co-expression of opsin and photoprotein genes in photocytes of Mnemiopsis suggests a dual role for photocytes in both light sensing and light production. Whether the two phenomena are functionally connected in this organism remains to be definitively determined through experimentation, although overlapping emission and absorption spectra of the two proteins suggests that it is a viable hypothesis. Although light-induced bioluminescence has been demonstrated previously in a few bilaterian taxa, including pyrosomes (Phylum Tunicata ) and in several crustaceans [73–76], the mechanism for this type of stimulation of light production has not been well investigated in any system. Further investigation will be required to determine whether light sensing stimulates light production in Mnemiopsis or if the two phenomena are linked in any way.
It is clear that Mnemiopsis bioluminescence is under neural control [36, 37, 39, 43, 44], but the co-localization of photoproteins and opsins in the same cells suggests that the cascade of events leading to and/or inhibiting bioluminescence may be more complex. Photoinactivation of photoproteins that is typical of ctenophores adds an additional layer of complexity to the system.
Here, we have shown that a ctenophore expresses a protein that senses the environment (light-sensing via opsin), and proteins that produce light (photoproteins), establishing that ctenophore photocytes are capable of sensing as well as responding to stimuli. Our results suggest that there is a non-visual function for opsin-mediated phototransduction in this early-branching metazoan species. Further study will be necessary to determine how the bioluminescence cascade operates in Mnemiopsis, and whether or not opsin and other phototransduction pathway genes play a role in regulating (promoting or inhibiting) luminescence production under different conditions.
Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the genes involved in light emission and photoreception in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. With respect to light emission, we identified two genomic clusters of tandemly arrayed photoproteins genes in Mnemiopsis containing a total of at least 10 full-length genes with high sequence conservation; we have also shown that they are likely maintained through purifying selection and concerted evolution. We were able to confirm that the multiple photoprotein isoforms previously reported by others are, indeed, products of different (or separate) individual genes. Further, our understanding of the evolution of the calcium-regulated photoprotein gene family has significantly improved as a result of having full-length genomic sequence data from early-branching non-bilaterian taxa in-hand. Based on these data, we have constructed the first metazoan-wide phylogeny for the photoprotein gene family, identified photoprotein-like genes in non-luminescent taxa (the poriferan Amphimedon and the cnidarian Nematostella), and demonstrated that the family likely arose at the base of the Metazoa. Regarding photoreception, we identified three putative opsin genes in Mnemiopsis, reconstructed a phylogeny that suggests ctenophore opsins do not group clearly with traditional bilaterian rhabdomeric, ciliary, or Go/RGR opsin groupings, and have identified a complete ciliary phototransduction cascade in the Mnemiopsis genome. We have demonstrated that one ctenophore opsin (MleiOpsin2) forms a functional photopigment that absorbs light at wavelengths that closely overlap with maximum photoprotein light emission. We believe that MleiOpsin2 represents the most ancient animal opsin with a demonstrated ability to absorb light. Expression patterns showing co-localization of photoprotein genes and two putative opsin genes in developing Mnemiopsis photocytes indicate that these cells have the capacity to both sense and produce light. Opsin expression was also detected in the apical sensory organ in neural ciliary cells identified over 130 years ago as putative photoreceptors. This study sets the stage for future experimentation that will be necessary to test the intriguing possibility of a functional linkage between light reception and light production in this ctenophore species.
Identification of photoproteins in the Mnemiopsisgenome
We used the Mnemiopsis draft genome, which was previously sequenced using 454 and Ilumina sequencing and assembled into scaffolds  using the Phusion assembler . The current draft assembly comprises 5,100 scaffolds (scaffold N-50 of 123 kb), which corresponds to coverage of approximately 12X. A total of 16,645 protein-coding gene models were predicted by using a combination of FGENESH , PASA , and EVidenceModeler software , which combines ab initio gene predictions and protein and transcript alignments into weighted consensus gene structures. These data are publicly available at the Mnemiopsis Genome Project website .
Hydromedusan photoprotein homologs were used in TBLASTN and BLASTP searches of the Mnemiopsis genome assembly and predicted gene models, respectively. Candidate matches were then used as queries in a reciprocal BLASTP search against the non-redundant protein database (GenBank). Scaffolds containing putative photoprotein gene models were visualized in the JBrowse web-based genome browser [81, 82].
Confirmation of individual Mnemiopsisphotoprotein sequences
Because several Mnemiopsis photoprotein gene predictions occur in tandem on the same scaffold, we sought additional evidence to determine how many full-length photoprotein genes are truly present and, of these, how many transcripts are actively expressed. We used two complementary methods to confirm the presence of a full-length Mnemiopsis photoprotein gene. First, we used a 5'- and 3'-RACE-PCR screening approach to determine which photoprotein transcripts are expressed during Mnemiopsis development. For this, we designed multiple gene-specific 5'- and 3'-RACE-PCR primers to target universally conserved regions of the coding sequence found among all the photoprotein gene models predicted from the assembly (Additional file 11). These primers were used in 5'- and 3'-RACE-PCR reactions (SMART RACE kit, Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) with RNA from mixed developmental stages ranging from 0 to 30 hpf resulting from the spawn of several individuals. In some cases, one round of RACE-PCR was performed; in others, a second round of RACE-PCR with a second nested gene-specific primer was used. Individual RACE-PCR products were cloned and sequenced, and sequences were aligned to the genomic sequences using MacClade v4.08 . Although the coding regions of all predicted Mnemiopsis photoproteins have high sequence identity, the sequence in the 5' and 3' UTRs differs substantially, which allowed us to positively identify which genomic sequence was identified by each product sequenced from the RACE-PCR screen. We considered aligned matches from either a 5'- or 3'-RACE sequence as confirmation that a particular transcript was expressed.
We obtained the second piece of evidence for the presence of putative photoproteins by examining the individual sequence reads that made up the Phusion assembly using Consed, which is a tool for viewing, editing, and finishing sequence assemblies [84, 85]. Illumina and 454 sequence reads were mapped to Phusion scaffolds containing putative photoproteins using cross_match (P. Green, unpublished; ). The mapping results were used to generate an alignment file that could be utilized by Consed. The Consed assembly comprises a subset of 454/Roche fragment and Illumina mate-pair reads that map to the photoprotein gene family. The initial inspection of this assembly assessed general coverage and mate-pair consistency across the targeted regions. Any mate-pair inconsistencies and sequence gaps were noted. RACE-PCR sequences used to confirm the presence of individual Mnemiopsis photoproteins were then imported into the Consed assembly. The incorporated RACE sequences were then aligned to the assembled reads for comparison.
Photoproteins and opsins
Putative Mnemiopsis photoproteins were aligned to known photoprotein homologs using MUSCLE  and corrected manually to align specific residues within EF-hand domains. Putative opsin sequences were aligned to known opsins with MUSCLE and manually trimmed to the transmembrane region (approximately 270 amino acids). Alignments were highlighted by similarity group conservation (defined by GeneDoc and the BLOSUM62 matrix). For both the photoprotein (full-length alignment, Additional file 12) and the opsin alignment (7TM region alignment, Additional file 13), amino acid identity and similarity pairwise comparisons were calculated in BioEdit v7.0.5  based on the alignments obtained with MUSCLE. Percentage identity was calculated as the percentage fraction identical characters in pairwise aligned sequences, treating gaps as an additional character. For similarity comparisons, the BLOSUM62 matrix was used. These alignments were used for phylogenetic analyses. Predicted molecular weights for the photoproteins were calculated using the Compute pI/Mw tool on the ExPASy Proteomics Server .
dN/dS analyses to test for selection among Mnemiopsisphotoprotein genes
We used the codeml program within the PAML software package  to generate maximum likelihood estimates of pairwise dN/dS (nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio, or omega) for the Mnemiopsis photoprotein genes. After testing various models, we selected the F61 model (CodonFreq = 3), which generates an empirical estimate of each codon frequency. We used a hill-climbing algorithm to maximize log-likelihood function with respect to kappa (transition/transversion ratio, fix_kappa = 0), t (sequence distance), and omega (fix_omega = 0). Using this approach accounts for transition/transversion rate biases, codon usage bias, and multiple substitutions. Analyses were conducted across the entire gene for all pairwise comparisons among the 10 sequences. All positions containing alignment gaps were eliminated automatically. Pairs of sequences with dS values (the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site) greater than 1.0 were considered too different from one another and discarded to avoid problems of mutational saturation . Mutational saturation in DNA and protein sequences occurs when individual sites have undergone multiple mutations over time, causing the number of observed differences to no longer accurately reflect the true evolutionary distance, or number of substitutions that have actually occurred since the divergence of the two sequences . This eliminated all pairwise comparisons between Sequence Groups A and C, and B and C.
Testing the Mnemiopsisphotoproteins for evidence of concerted evolution
We used GENECONV v1.81  to test the Mnemiopsis photoproteins for evidence of recombination events that are indicative of concerted evolution. We changed the default gscale from 0 to 1, ignored all sites with missing data, and did a global analysis with 10,000 permutations and a P-value cutoff of 0.05.
Searching for phototransduction pathway genes in Mnemiopsis
Phototransduction genes  were used as queries in BLASTP searches against the set of Mnemiopsis predicted gene models (version 2.2) as well as an unfiltered set of Mnemiopsis gene models (that is, gene predictions not incorporated into the final set). The identifier and the E-value of the top hit are listed in Table 2. A reciprocal best BLASTP search was performed using the top Mnemiopsis gene model against the non-redundant protein database in NCBI. The top result and the E-value of the hit are also listed in Table 2.
Sequence retrieval for photoprotein phylogeny
Hydromedusae photoprotein homologs were used in TBLASTN and BLASTP searches of available genome assemblies and predicted gene models of non-metazoan eukaryotic phyla, including the choanoflagellates Monosiga brevicollis and Salpingoeca rosetta, the amoeboid symbiont Capsaspora owczarzaki, and non-bilaterian metazoan taxa including the poriferan Amphimedon queenslandica, the placozoan Trichoplax adhearans, and the cnidarians Nematostella vectensis and Hydra magnipapillata. For calmodulin outgroup sequences, human calmodulin [GenBank:CAA36839] was used in similar BLAST searches. An identical search strategy was used to query the Mnemiopsis genome and predicted gene models for calmodulin homologs, which resulted in two hits (Mlei_311625 and Mlei_104636 in Figure 3), which have been deposited [GenBank:JQ724658 and JQ724659]. SARC outgroup sequences were obtained from GenBank. The filtered protein models for Monosiga v. 1.0 , Trichoplax v. 1.0 , Nematostella v. 1.0 , and Hydra v. 1.0  were downloaded from each species' Joint Genome Institute genome website. The set of Amphimedon gene models was downloaded from the ftp site provided in the genome paper . Gene models for Capsaspora and Salpingoeca were downloaded from the Origins of Multicellularity Sequencing Project at the Broad Institute  in March 2011.
Sequence retrieval for opsin phylogeny
A number of recent studies have described the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of opsins from various animals including cnidarians, protostomes, and deuterostomes [62–64, 98]. A majority of these studies reconstructed phylogenies based on the functionally conserved 7TM region of the proteins. A subset of sequences reported in these studies was selected to represent the diversity of previously studied animal opsins, which include rhabdomeric, ciliary, and Go/RGR opsins, as well as including 14 Nematostella opsins to represent cnidarian-specific clades. Opsins from Nematostella and human were used in TBLASTN and BLASTP searches of genome assemblies and predicted gene models for Trichoplax, Amphimedon, Monosiga, and Capsaspora, as described above. Searches in genomes from these later four species yielded no positive hits to opsins, consistent with earlier analyses [62, 64]. An identical search strategy was used to query the Mnemiopsis genome and predicted gene models, which resulted in three hits (MleiOpsin1 to 3). We also searched available EST data at NCBI for Pleurobrachia sequences, which resulted in identifying one sequence (PpilOpsin1, GenBank:CU419614), which was truncated, and a second sequence (PpilOpsin2, GenBank:FQ011385), which covered the complete 7TM domain.
Photoprotein and opsin phylogenies
To choose the best-fit model of protein evolution, we used the program ProtTest v2.4  to apply Akaike information criterion 1 and 2 and Bayesian information criterion 2 metrics to a variety of possible substitution matrices and rate assumptions . The results from the overall comparison of these metrics indicated the best fit model for the full-length photoprotein alignment was LG+I+Γ+F and for the opsin alignment was LG+Γ+F, where 'LG' indicates the substitution matrix , 'I' specifies a proportion of invariant sites, 'Γ' specifies gamma-distributed rates across sites, and 'F' specifies that empirical amino acid frequencies in the dataset are used.
Maximum likelihood analyses were performed with the MPI version of RAxML v7.2.8 (RAXML-HPC-MPI) . For each alignment, we conducted two independent maximum likelihood searches: one with 25 parsimony starting trees (raxmlHPC-MPI -f d -m PROTGAMMAILGF -s input.phy -#25 -k) and another with 25 random starting trees (raxmlHPC-MPI -f d -m PROTGAMMAILGF -s input.phy -#25 -d -k). For all analyses, 100 bootstrapped trees were computed. Bayesian analyses were performed with MrBayes3.2 . MrBayes does not support the LG model of evolution, so we used the second best fit model in ProtTest for each analysis (photoprotein: RtREV+I+ Γ +F; opsin: WAG+ Γ +F) with two independent five million generation runs of five chains, with trees sampled every 500 generations using the following execution block (prset aamodelpr = fixed(rtrev); lset rates = Invgamma; prset statefreqpr = fixed(empirical); mcmp mcmcdiagn = no nruns = 1 ngen = 5000000 printfreq = 5000 samplefreq = 500 nchains = 5 savebrlens = yes; mcmc;). Convergence diagnostics, examined with the help of AWTY , indicated a conservative burn-in fraction of 0.25. The runs all reached stationarity, and adjusting the burn-in did not affect the topology, swap rate, or other indices of convergence. Consensus trees and posterior probabilities were calculated once the stationary phase was obtained. We evaluated all trees in a likelihood framework by computing likelihood scores for all trees using the LG matrix in PHYML v3.0  with the following command (phyml -i 01-Input.phy -c 4 -m LG -a e -o lr -f e -u 01-Input.tre -v e -d aa -b 0 -s NNI). We then chose the tree with the highest likelihood from all 50 maximum likelihood searches and both Bayesian trees and applied both maximum likelihood and Bayesian consensus support values to the most likely tree, which was arranged and visualized using FigTree v1.3.1 . Trees were rerooted in FigTree if needed, and then annotated manually using Adobe Illustrator. Nodes with support values between 50% and 100% were labeled on the trees. To explore consensus results among all of the result trees generated, we also computed 50% majority rule consensus trees with RAxML (-J MR option). We used PhyUtility  to examine the branch attachment frequency and leaf stability of MleiOpsin3. To examine the effect of MleiOpsin3 on the phylogeny, we removed this sequence and repeated the analysis.
Mnemiopsisphotoprotein protein expression and characterization
PCR and expression cloning
Adult Mnemiopsis specimens were collected during Spring 2011 from the Atlantic Coast off the pier at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science in Miami, FL, USA using dip nets and then stored in ethanol. Genomic DNA was extracted from tissue using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) as per instructions. PCR primers for subcloning are detailed in Additional file 14. Genomic DNA served as the template for PCR using Phusion DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA), and cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step 98°C for 30 s, then 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, and final extension of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified and then incubated at 72°C for 12 min for 3'-adenine residue addition and subcloned into the StrataClone PCR cloning vector pSC-A-amp/kan (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sanger sequencing was used to identify full-length clones for expression cloning. Expression cloning primers are detailed in Additional file 14.
Purified mini-prep DNA from PCR cloning was used as a template for expression cloning using Phusion DNA Polymerase, and cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step 98°C for 30 s, then 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s, and final extension of 72°C for 10 min. Purified product was digested with restriction enzymes (New England BioLabs, Inc.) and ligated into a pCold expression vector (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) using Invitrogen T4 DNA ligase (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 8-histidine residues and maltose binding protein on the N-terminus; MleiPP9 was ligated into the same expression vector but without the maltose binding protein tag.
Expression and purification from Escherichia colicells
Sanger sequencing was used to confirm full-length in-frame clones that were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3; New England BioLabs, Inc.) by electroporation. Single colonies were picked into 5-mL 2XYT media containing 100 μg/mL carbenicillin (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and grown at 37°C overnight with shaking at 250 rpm. The resulting culture was then used to inoculate 500 mL of 2XYT and antibiotics. Once the optical density at 600 nm reached between 0.5 and 0.6, cultures were placed on ice for 60 min. To this was added 0.8 mM of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (Fisher Scientific) and the cultures were grown for at least 24 h at 15°C while shaking. Cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 ×g for 30 min. Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min in buffer containing 1 mg/mL lysozyme, sonicated, and pelleted by centrifugation. The remaining supernatant was applied to nitrilotriacetic acid beads (Qiagen) at 4°C for 1 h with gentle agitation. To elute recombinant protein, 2 mL of elution buffer containing 250 mM imidazole was applied to the columns and fractions were collected, dialyzed using spin filters with a membrane molecular weight cut-off of 10,000 (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), and digested with tobacco etch virus protease overnight at 4°C. This reaction was again purified using nitrilotriacetic acid beads (Qiagen) and recombinant protein was collected as the flow-through.
Each step of purification was subjected to protein gel electrophoresis following the Laemmli method (data not shown). SDS sample buffer (Life Technologies) was added to 1 to 5 µL of each sample to a total volume of 10 µL and loaded on a 4% to 20% Tris-Glycine PAGE gel (Life Technologies) with 8 µL of BenchMark Prestained Protein Ladder (New England BioLabs, Inc.). Gels were run according to manufacturer's specifications. Coomassie Blue staining (Life Technologies) was used to visualize gel bands.
Photoprotein spectral analysis
The following conditions were used for luminescence assays unless otherwise noted: purified tobacco etch virus-digested apo-photoprotein was added to 50 mM phosphate buffer with 450 mM NaCl, 5 mM Ambion EDTA (Life Technologies) and 1 mg/mL coelenterazine in dimethyl sulfoxide (Fisher Scientific) and regenerated for longer than 16 h without light at 4°C. The pH of this buffer was adjusted to 8.0, 9.0, or 10.0. Luminescence spectra were measured using a Roper Scientific black-illuminated CCD camera mounted to an Acton series SpectraPro monochromator (Princeton Instruments, Princeton, NJ, USA). Emission spectra were collected using WinSpec software and exported to R, where data were normalized and graphed using a spline curve-fit analysis.
Mnemiopsisopsin protein expression and characterization
The full-length MleiOpsin2 cDNA was modified by RT-PCR using forward (5'-NNNNGAATTCCACCATGTCAAGCCCCAACG-3') and reverse (5'-TATAGTCGACAGTCGGCCTCCAAAGTAAAGG-3') primers. This cDNA, containing EcoRI, Kosak, and SalI sequences, was cloned into the EcoRI and SalI restriction sites of the expression vector pMT5. The plasmid was expressed in COS1 cells by transient transfection. MleiOpsin2 pigment was regenerated by incubating the opsin with 11-cis-retinal (Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA) and was purified using immobilized 1D4 (The Culture Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in buffer W1 (50 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, pH 6.6, 140 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 20% (w/v) glycerol, and 0.1% dodecyl maltoside) . UV visible spectrum was recorded at 20°C using a Hitachi U-3000 dual beam spectrophotometer (Mountain View, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using Sigmaplot software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA).
Mnemiopsisphotoprotein and opsin mRNA expression
Genes of interest were isolated using RACE-PCR (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) (see Confirmation of individual Mnemiopsis photoprotein sequences for details). In situ hybridizations (probes designed for photoproteins from each sequence group: MleiPP1, MleiPP7, MleiPP8; plus opsins MleiOpsin1 and MleiOpsin2) were performed as previously described . Full- or partial-length sequences, ranging in size from 600 to 2000 bp, were used to transcribe digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes. We detected these probes using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated digoxigenin antibody, utilizing the substrates nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) to then detect the alkaline phosphatase activity (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Specimens were mounted in 70% glycerol, viewed under a Zeiss AxioSkop, and imaged using an AxioCam (Thornwood, NY, USA).
Co-fluorescent in situ hybridizations of one opsin gene (MleiOpsin2) and one photoprotein gene (MleiPP1) were based on Xenopus protocols available at Xenbase . A fluorescein-labeled photoprotein probe was mixed with a digoxigenin-labeled opsin probe (MleiOpsin2), and hybridization was performed as before. Following hybridization and washes, the opsin probe was detected first using an anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase antibody (Roche Applied Science) and NBT/BCIP substrates. When the signal was sufficiently developed, embryos were washed five times with PBS. Endogenous peroxidase was then quenched via a 30 min wash in 1% hydrogen peroxide. The photoprotein probe was then detected using an anti-fluorescein-peroxidase antibody (Roche Applied Science). Following washes in PBS, embryos were incubated in tyramide-fluorescein isothiocyanate plus 0.001% hydrogen peroxide for 45 minutes. If needed, this tyramide step was repeated up to three times. Embryos were then washed with PBS until the signal was sufficiently visible. Embryos were incubated with Hoechst 33432 for 30 min to visualize nuclei, and then washed twice more in PBS.
Opsin and photoprotein fluorescent in situ hybridizations were imaged using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope. The opsin NBT/BCIP visualized staining was imaged using reflective confocal microscopy . Individual stacks were merged into a three-dimensional projection using the Zen software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY, USA).
Nematostellaphotoprotein-like mRNA expression
The two Nematostella photoprotein-like genes were isolated via 3'-RACE-PCR using mixed-stage (0 to 7 days post-fertilization) Nematostella cDNA. These clones were used to generate digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes for in situ hybridization. These probes were 500 bp (NvecPP1) and 1,200 bp (NvecPP2). Nematostella embryos and polyps were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde as previously described . In situ hybridizations were performed at 65°C, as previously described [111, 112]. Specimens were mounted in 70% glycerol and imaged on an AxioSkop2 with an AxioCam (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
expressed sequence tag
green fluorescent protein
Go-coupled plus retinochrome, retinal G protein-coupled receptor
nitro blue tetrazolium
National Center for Biotechnology Information
open reading frame
polymerase chain reaction
rapid amplification of cDNA ends
Haddock SHD, Moline MA, Case JF: Bioluminescence in the sea. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2010, 2: 443-493. 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081028.
Harper RD, Case JF: Disruptive counterillumination and its anti-predatory value in the plainfish midshipman Porichthys notatus. Marine Biology. 1999, 134: 529-540. 10.1007/s002270050568.
Frank TM, Widder EA, Latz MI, Case JF: Dietary maintenance of bioluminescence in a deep-sea mysid. J Exp Biol. 1984, 109: 385-389.
Tsuji FI, Barnes AT, Case JF: Bioluminescence in the marine teleost, Porichthys notatus, and its induction in a non-luminous form by Cypridina (ostracod) luciferin. Nature. 1972, 237: 515-516. 10.1038/237515a0.
Haddock SHD, Rivers TJ, Robison BH: Can coelenterates make coelenterazine? Dietary requirement for luciferin in cnidarian bioluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11148-11151. 10.1073/pnas.201329798.
Shimomura O: Bioluminescence in the sea: photoprotein systems. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1985, 39: 351-372.
Shimomura O, Johnson FH, Saiga Y: Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1962, 59: 223-239. 10.1002/jcp.1030590302.
Morin JG, Hastings JW: Biochemistry of the bioluminescence of colonial hydroids and other coelenterates. J Cell Physiol. 1971, 77: 305-312. 10.1002/jcp.1040770304.
Ward WW, Seliger HH: Extraction and purification of calcium-activated photoproteins from the ctenophores Mnemiopsis sp. and Beroë ovata. Biochemistry. 1974, 13: 1491-1499. 10.1021/bi00704a027.
Inouye S, Noguchi M, Sakaki Y, Takagi Y, Miyata T, Iwanaga S, Miyata T, Tsuji FI: Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for the luminescent protein aequorin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985, 82: 3154-3158. 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3154.
Prasher DC, McCann RO, Longiaru M, Cormier MJ: Sequence comparisons of complementary DNAs encoding aequorin isotypes. Biochemistry. 1987, 26: 1326-1332. 10.1021/bi00379a019.
Fagan TF, Ohmiya Y, Blinks JR, Inouye S, Tsuji FI: Cloning, expression and sequence analysis of cDNA for the Ca2+-binding photoprotein, mitrocomin. FEBS Lett. 1993, 333: 301-305. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80675-K.
Inouye S, Tsuji FI: Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for the Ca2+-activated photoprotein, clytin. FEBS Lett. 1993, 315: 343-346. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81191-2.
Illarionov BA, Bondar VS, Illarionova VA, Vysotski ES: Sequence of the cDNA encoding the Ca2+-activated photoprotein obelin from the hydroid polyp Obelia longissima. Gene. 1995, 153: 273-274. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)00797-V.
Markova SV, Vysotski ES, Blinks JR, Burakova LP, Wang B-C, Lee J: Obelin from the bioluminescent marine hydroid Obelia geniculata: cloning, expression, and comparison of some properties with those of other Ca2+-regulated photoproteins. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 2227-2236. 10.1021/bi0117910.
Golz S, Markova S, Burakova L, Frank L, Vysotski E: Isolated berovin photoprotein and use thereof. International Patent Application PCT/EP2004/009118 Publication Number WO/2005/021591. 2005
Markova SV, Burakova LP, Golz S, Malikova NP, Frank LA, Vysotski ES: The light-sensitive photoprotein berovin from the bioluminescent ctenophore Beroe abyssicola: a novel type of Ca2+-regulated photoprotein. FEBS Journal. 2012, 279: 856-870. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08476.x.
Golz S, Markova S, Burakova L, Frank L, Vysotski E: Isolated photoprotein bolinopsin, and the use thereof. 2005, PCT/EP2004/006608 Publication Number WO/2005/000885 (Patent)
Golz S, Vysotski E, Markova S, Burakova L, Frank L: Isolated photoprotein gr-bolinopsin and use thereof. 2006, PCT/EP2006/002939 Publication Number WO/2006/108518 (Patent)
Aghamaali M, Jafarian V, Sariri R, Molakarimi M, Rasti B, Taghdir M, Sajedi R, Hosseinkhani S: Cloning, sequencing, expression and structural investigation of mnemiopsin from Mnemiopsis leidyi: an attempt toward understanding Ca2+-regulated photoproteins. Protein J. 2011, 30: 566-574. 10.1007/s10930-011-9363-8.
Jafarian V, Sariri R, Hosseinkhani S, Aghamaali M-R, Sajedi RH, Taghdir M, Hassannia S: A unique EF-hand motif in mnemiopsin photoprotein from Mnemiopsis leidyi: implication for its low calcium sensitivity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011, 413: 164-170. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.022.
Kawasaki H, Nakayama S, Kretsinger RH: Classification and evolution of EF-hand proteins. Biometals. 1998, 11: 277-295. 10.1023/A:1009282307967.
Kretsinger RH: Structure and evolution of calcium-modulated proteins. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1980, 8: 119-174. 10.3109/10409238009105467.
Nelson MR, Chazin WJ: Structures of EF-hand Ca 2+-binding proteins: diversity in the organization, packing and response to Ca 2+ binding. BioMetals. 1998, 11: 297-318. 10.1023/A:1009253808876.
Deng L, Vysotski ES, Markova SV, Liu Z-J, Lee J, Rose J, Wang B-C: All three Ca2+-binding loops of photoproteins bind calcium ions: the crystal structures of calcium-loaded apo-aequorin and apo-obelin. Protein Sci. 2005, 14: 663-675. 10.1110/ps.041142905.
Blinks JR, Prendergast FG, Allen DG: Photoproteins as biological calcium indicators. Pharmacol Rev. 1976, 28: 1-93.
Shimomura O: Isolation and properties of various molecular forms of aequorin. Biochem J. 1986, 234: 271-277.
Ward WW, Seliger HH: Properties of mnemiopsin and berovin, calcium-activated photoproteins from the ctenophores Mnemiopsis sp. and Beroë ovata. Biochemistry. 1974, 13: 1500-1510. 10.1021/bi00704a028.
Blinks JR: Use of photoproteins as intracellular calcium indicators. Environ Health Perspect. 1990, 84: 75-81.
Tsuji FI, Ohmiya Y, Fagan TF, Toh H, Inouye S: Molecular evolution of the Ca(2+)-binding photoproteins of the Hydrozoa. Photochem Photobiol. 1995, 62: 657-661. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb08713.x.
Vysotski E, Markova S, Frank L: Calcium-regulated photoproteins of marine coelenterates. Mol Biol. 2006, 40: 355-367. 10.1134/S0026893306030022.
Ryan JF, Pang K, Mullikin JC, Martindale MQ, Baxevanis AD: The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa. Evodevo. 2010, 1: 9-10.1186/2041-9139-1-9.
Haddock SHD, Case JF: Not all ctenophores are bioluminescent. Pleurobrachia. Biol Bull. 1995, 189: 356-362. 10.2307/1542153.
Welch VL, Vigneron JP, Parker AR: The cause of colouration in the ctenophore Beroe cucumis. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: R985-986. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.060.
Peters AW: Phosphorescence in ctenophores. J Exp Zool. 1905, 2: 103-116. 10.1002/jez.1400020103.
Moore AR: Luminescence in Mnemiopsis. J Gen Physiol. 1924, 6: 403-412. 10.1085/jgp.6.4.403.
Harvey EN: Bioluminescence. 1952, New York, NY: Academic Press
Freeman G, Reynolds GT: The development of bioluminescence in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Dev Biol. 1973, 31: 61-100. 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90321-7.
Anctil M: Ultrastructure of the luminescent system of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Cell Tissue Res. 1985, 242: 333-340.
Allman GJ: Note on the phosphorescence of Beroë. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 1862, 4: 518-519.
Ward WW, Seliger HH: Action spectrum and quantum yield for the photoinactivation of mnemiopsin, a bioluminescent photoprotein from the ctenophore Mnemiopsis sp. Photochem Photobiol. 1976, 23: 351-363. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1976.tb07260.x.
Anctil M, Shimomura O: Mechanism of photoinactivation and reactivation in the bioluminescence system of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis. Biochem J. 1984, 221: 269-272.
Chang JJ: Analysis of the luminescent response of the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, to stimulation. J Cell Physiol. 1954, 44: 365-394. 10.1002/jcp.1030440303.
Anctil M: Cholinergic and monoaminergic mechanisms associated with control of bioluminescence in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. J Exp Biol. 1985, 119: 225-238.
Ruby EG, McFall-Ngai MJ: A squid that glows in the night: development of an animal-bacterial mutualism. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 4865-4870.
Tong D, Rozas NS, Oakley TH, Mitchell J, Colley NJ, McFall-Ngai MJ: Evidence for light perception in a bioluminescent organ. Proc Natl Acad Scie USA. 2009, 106: 9836-9841. 10.1073/pnas.0904571106.
Blakesley RW, Hansen NF, Gupta J, McDowell JC, Maskeri B, Barnabas BB, Brooks SY, Coleman H, Haghighi P, Ho SL, Schandler K, Stantripop S, Vogt JL, Thomas PJ, Bouffard GG, Green ED: Effort required to finish shotgun-generated genome sequences differs significantly among vertebrates. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 21-10.1186/1471-2164-11-21.
Phillippy AM, Schatz MC, Pop M: Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: R55-10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r55.
Morin JG: Coelenterate bioluminescence. Coelenterate Biology: Reviews and New Perspectives. Edited by: Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM. 1974, New York, NY: Academic Press, 397-438.
Inouye S: Blue fluorescent protein from the calcium-sensitive photoprotein aequorin is a heat resistant enzyme, catalyzing the oxidation of coelenterazine. FEBS Lett. 2004, 577: 105-110. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.078.
Inouye S, Sasaki S: Blue fluorescent protein from the calcium-sensitive photoprotein aequorin: catalytic properties for the oxidation of coelenterazine as an oxygenase. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580: 1977-1982. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.065.
Nei M, Kumar S: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. 2000, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Nei M, Rooney AP: Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Ann Rev Genet. 2005, 39: 121-152. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240.
Müller W, Kasueske M, Wang X, Schröder H, Wang Y, Pisignano D, Wiens M: Luciferase a light source for the silica-based optical waveguides (spicules) in the demosponge Suberites domuncula. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66: 537-552. 10.1007/s00018-008-8492-5.
Shichida Y, Matsuyama T: Evolution of opsins and phototransduction. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2009, 364: 2881-2895. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0051.
Mnemiopsis Genome Project website. [http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/mnemiopsis]
Horridge GA: Presumed photoreceptive cilia in a ctenophore. Quart J Micr Sci. 1964, 105: 311-317.
Plachetzki DC, Fong CR, Oakley TH: The evolution of phototransduction from an ancestral cyclic nucleotide gated pathway. Proc Biol Sci. 2010, 277: 1963-1969. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1797.
Doyle JJ: Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Biology. 1992, 17: 144-163.
Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA: Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009, 24: 332-340. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.009.
Haddock SHD, Case JF: Bioluminescence spectra of shallow and deep-sea gelatinous zooplankton: ctenophores, medusae and siphonophores. Marine Biology. 1999, 133: 571-582. 10.1007/s002270050497.
Plachetzki DC, Degnan BM, Oakley TH: The origins of novel protein interactions during animal opsin evolution. PLOS One. 2007, 2: e1054-10.1371/journal.pone.0001054.
Suga H, Schmid V, Gehring WJ: Evolution and functional diversity of jellyfish opsins. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: 51-55. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.059.
Marlow H: Cell type diversity and developmental mechanisms in larval and adult anthozoan cnidarians. 2010, PhD thesis. University of Hawaii at Manoa
Porter ML, Blasic JR, Bok MJ, Cameron EG, Pringle T, Cronin TW, Robinson PR: Shedding new light on opsin evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2012, 279: 3-14. 10.1098/rspb.2011.1819.
Chun C: Die Ctenophoren des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. 1880, Leipzig: Engelmann
Pang K, Martindale MQ: Comb jellies (Ctenophora): a model for basal metazoan evolution and development. Emerging Model Organisms, vol 1. Volume 1. Edited by: Crotty DA, Gann A. 2009, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 167-195.
Martindale MQ: The ontogeny and maintenance of adult symmetry properties in the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis mccradyi. Dev Biol. 1986, 118: 556-576. 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90026-6.
Martindale MQ: Larval reproduction in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis mccradyi (order Lobata). Marine Biology. 1987, 94: 409-414. 10.1007/BF00428247.
Reusch TBH, Bolte S, Sparwel M, Moss AG, Javidpour J: Microsatellites reveal origin and genetic diversity of Eurasian invasions by one of the world's most notorious marine invader, Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora). Mol Ecol. 2010, 19: 2690-2699. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04701.x.
Hyman L: The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. 1940, London: McGraw-Hill
Bowlby MR, Widder EA, Case JF: Patterns of stimulated bioluminescence in two pyrosomes (Tunicata: Pyrosomatidae). Biol Bull. 1990, 179: 340-350. 10.2307/1542326.
Tsuji FI, Lynch RW, Haneda Y: Studies on the bioluminescence of the marine ostracod. Biol Bull. 1970, 139: 386-401. 10.2307/1540092.
Lapota D, Losee JR, Geiger ML: Bioluminescence displays induced by pulsed light. Limnol Oceanogr. 1986, 31: 887-889. 10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0887.
Kay RH: Light-stimulated and light-inhibited bioluminescence of the euphausiid Meganyctiphanes norvegica (G.O. Sars). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965, 162: 385-386.
Herring PJ, Barnes AT: Light-stimulated bioluminescence of Thalassocaris crinita (Dana) (Decapoda, Caridea). Crustaceana. 1976, 31: 107-110. 10.1163/156854076X00864.
Mullikin JC, Ning Z: The Phusion assembler. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 81-90. 10.1101/gr.731003.
Salamov AA, Solovyev VV: Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 516-522. 10.1101/gr.10.4.516.
Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Mount SM, Wortman JR, Smith RK, Hannick LI, Maiti R, Ronning CM, Rusch DB, Town CD, Salzberg SL, White O: Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 5654-5666. 10.1093/nar/gkg770.
Haas B, Salzberg S, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen J, Orvis J, White O, Buell C, Wortman J: Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: 1-22.
Skinner ME, Uzilov AV, Stein LD, Mungall CJ, Holmes IH: JBrowse: a next-generation genome browser. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1630-1638. 10.1101/gr.094607.109.
Skinner ME, Holmes IH: Setting up the JBrowse genome browser. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2010, Chapter 9:Unit 9.13
Maddison DR, Maddison WP: MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. 2000, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 195-202.
Phred, Phrap, Consed. [http://www.phrap.org/phredphrapconsed.html]
Edgar R: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.
Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acid Symposium Series. 1999, 41: 95-98.
ExPASy Proteomics Server. [http://www.expasy.ch/tools/pi_tool.html]
Yang Z: PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS. 1997, 13: 555-556.
Page RDM, Holmes EC: Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach. 1998, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science
Sawyer SA: Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol Biol Evol. 1989, 6: 526-538.
King N, Westbrook MJ, Young SL, Kuo A, Abedin M, Chapman J, Fairclough S, Hellsten U, Isogai Y, Letunic I, Marr M, Pincus D, Putnam N, Rokas A, Wright KJ, Zuzow R, Dirks W, Good M, Goodstein D, Lemons D, Li W, Lyons JB, Morris A, Nichols S, Richter DJ, Salamov A, JGI Sequencing, Borik P, Lin WA, Manning G, et al: The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans. Nature. 2008, 451: 783-788. 10.1038/nature06617.
Srivastava M, Begovic E, Chapman J, Putnam NH, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Kuo A, Mitros T, Salamov A, Carpenter ML, Signorovitch AY, Moreno MA, Kamm K, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Shapiro H, Grigoriev IV, Buss LW, Schierwater B, Dellaporta SL, Rokhsar DS: The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature. 2008, 454: 955-960. 10.1038/nature07191.
Putnam NH, Srivastava M, Hellsten U, Dirks B, Chapman J, Salamov A, Terry A, Shapiro H, Lindquist E, Kapitonov VV, Genikhovich G, Grigoriev IV, Lucas SM, Steele RE, Finnerty JR, Technau U, Martindale MQ, Rokhsar DS: Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science. 2007, 317: 86-94. 10.1126/science.1139158.
Chapman JA, Kirkness EF, Simakov O, Hampson SE, Mitros T, Weinmaier T, Rattei T, Balasubramanian PG, Borman J, Busam D, Disbennett K, Pfannkoch C, Sumin N, Sutton GG, Viswanathan LD, Walenz B, Goodstein DM, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Prochnik SE, Putnam NH, Shu S, Blumberg B, Dana CE, Gee L, Kibler DF, Law L, Lindgens D, Martinez DE, Peng J, et al: The dynamic genome of Hydra. Nature. 2010, 464: 592-596. 10.1038/nature08830.
Srivastava M, Simakov O, Chapman J, Fahey B, Gauthier MEA, Mitros T, Richards GS, Conaco C, Dacre M, Hellsten U, Larroux C, Putnam NH, Stanke M, Adamska M, Darling A, Degnan SM, Oakley TH, Plachetzki DC, Zhai Y, Adamski M, Calcino A, Cummins SF, Goodstein DM, Harris C, Jackson DJ, Leys SP, Shu S, Woodcroft BJ, Vervoort M, Kosik KS, et al: The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature. 2010, 466: 720-726. 10.1038/nature09201.
Origins of Multicellularity Sequencing Project at the Broad Institute. [http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/multicellularity_project/MultiDownloads.html]
Passamaneck YJ, Furchheim N, Hejnol A, Martindale MQ, Luter C: Ciliary photoreceptors in the cerebral eyes of a protostome larva. Evodevo. 2011, 2: 6-10.1186/2041-9139-2-6.
Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D: ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 2104-2105. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263.
Akaike H: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr. 1974, 19: 716-723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
Le SQ, Gascuel O: An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 1307-1320. 10.1093/molbev/msn067.
Stamatakis A: RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2688-2690. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446.
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
Wilgenbusch J, Warren D, Swofford DL: AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. [http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty/]
Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52: 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.
Rambaut A: FigTree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/]
Smith SA, Dunn CW: Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24: 715-716. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm619.
Yokoyama S: Phylogenetic analysis and experimental approaches to study colour vision in vertebrates. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 315: 312-325.
Xenbase FISH Protocols. [http://www.xenbase.org/xenwiki/index.php/Wholemount_embryo_FISH_/_Double_FISH]
Jekely G, Arendt D: Cellular resolution expression profiling using confocal detection of NBT/BCIP precipitate by reflection microscopy. BioTechniques. 2007, 42: 751-755. 10.2144/000112462.
Martindale MQ, Pang K, Finnerty JR: Investigating the origins of triploblasty: 'mesodermal' gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa). Development. 2004, 131: 2463-2474. 10.1242/dev.01119.
Finnerty J, Pang K, Burton P, Paulson D, Martindale M: Origins of bilateral symmetry: Hox and dpp expression in a sea anemone. Science. 2004, 304: 1335-1337. 10.1126/science.1091946.
Many thanks to the following researchers, who inspired us with their early work on ctenophores, including work on Mnemiopsis and bioluminescence, and for insightful discussions and comments on this project: Woody Hastings, Sid Tamm, Richard Harbison, and Larry Madin. We would also like to thank Joram Piatigorsky for a helpful discussion on opsin and photoreceptor evolution and Joe Bielawski for insight into evolutionary scenarios of tandemly duplicated genes. Thanks to Tamsen Polley for providing illustrations used in Figure 4. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge four anonymous reviewers for comments that substantially improved the manuscript.
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH). In addition, AMR was supported by Award Number F32HD062178 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, NIH; MP and SHDH were supported by Award Number GM087198, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH; and SY was supported by Award Number EY016400, National Eye Institute, NIH.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
CES, KP, MLP, AMR, JFR, SY, SHDH, MQM, and ADB conceived and designed the experiments. CES, KP, MLP, AMR, DS, and TT performed the experiments. CES, KP, MLP, AMR, JFR, MP, JG, SYB, RWB, SY, SHDH, MQM and ADB analyzed the data. RWB, SY, SHDH, MQM, and ADB contributed reagents, materials, or analysis tools. CES, KP, MLP, AMR, JFR, SHDH, MQM, and ADB wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Additional file 1: Overall pairwise photoprotein percent amino acid identity comparisons for a subset of photoproteins and photoprotein-like sequences. (XLS 24 KB)
Additional file 2: Predicted molecular weight (kDa) and isoelectric point (pH) values and averages for the 10 Mnemiopsisphotoproteins. (XLS 21 KB)
Additional file 3: Global analysis results for sequence pairs with evidence for recombination from GENECONV for the Mnemiopsisphotoproteins. (XLS 26 KB)
Additional file 4: Alignment of EF-hand domains I, III, and IV of select photoprotein and photoprotein-like sequences. Important calcium ligand residues in the 12-residue calcium binding loops within each EF-hand domain are indicated with black triangles. Columns of residues are shaded as in Figure 2. Species are abbreviated as follows: Ac = Aequorea coerulescens; Aque = Amphimedon queenslandica; Cg = Clytia gregarium; Mc = Mitrocoma cellularia; Mlei = Mnemiopsis leidyi; Nvec = Nematostella vectensis; Og = Obelia geniculata. (EPS 793 KB)
Additional file 5: In situ hybridizations showing mRNA expression patterns for two photoprotein-like genes from Nematostella. (A) NvecPP2: Panels A-C and E-H are lateral views, with the oral pole to the left. Panel D is an oral view. Expression is first detected in the early polyp stage (A-D) in the endoderm, particularly in the mesenteries. There is also an additional expression in the apical tuft (B). In older polyp stages (E-H), the expression in the mesenteries decreases, while the apical tuft expression remains. There is also an additional expression domain in the tips of newly forming tentacles (F, H). (B) NvecPP1: Panels A-C and E-H are lateral views, with the oral pole to the left and Panel D is an oral view. Expression of NvecPP1 is detected in the late planula stages (A), in small patches in the endoderm towards the oral pole. In early polyp stages (B-D), the expression continues and forms a ring in the endoderm, although expression is highest in the areas between where the tentacles grow. In older polyp stages (E-H), the endodermal expression slowly decreases. In these stages, there is also endodermal expression in the tips of newly forming tentacles (F-H). Format: TIF (TIFF 3 MB)
Additional file 6: Opsin seven-transmembrane pairwise comparisons of percent amino acid identity (top right) and similarity (bottom left) for a subset of opsin sequences. Species are abbreviated as follows: Hs = Homo sapiens; Nv = Nematostella vectensis; Mlei = Mnemiopsis leidyi; Ppil = Pleurobrachia pileus. (XLS 24 KB)
Additional file 7: Alignment of the seven-transmembrane region of select opsin sequences. Columns of residues are shaded by similarity group conservation (defined by GeneDoc and the BLOSUM62 matrix) where black shows 100%, dark grey shows ≥80%, and light grey shows ≥60% similar residues in a column. Gene name abbreviations: MWS = medium-wavelength sensitive; RGR = retinal G protein-coupled receptor. Conserved sites of chromophore linkage at Lys296 (black circle), disulfide bridge formation at Cys110-Cys187 (black stars) and signal propagation at Glu134-Arg35-Tyr136 (black square) are indicated. Sites corresponding to the acidic counterion in the vertebrate pigments (Glu113) and the counterion in other species (Glu181) are also indicated (black triangles). Species are abbreviated as follows: Dm = Drosophila melanogaster; Es = Euprymna scolopes; Hs = Homo sapiens; Mlei = Mnemiopsis leidyi; Nv = Nematostella vectensis. (EPS 2 MB)
Additional file 12: Photoprotein multiple sequence alignment in FASTA format. Species abbreviations as in Figure 3. (TXT 13 KB)
Additional file 14: Primers used for cloning a subset of Mnemiopsisphotoproteins for expression experiments. A first set of PCR primers was used to clone the full-length proteins; a second set of expression cloning primers was used to add restriction sites for cloning proteins into an expression vector. For = forward; Rev = reverse. (XLS 22 KB)
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
About this article
Cite this article
Schnitzler, C.E., Pang, K., Powers, M.L. et al. Genomic organization, evolution, and expression of photoprotein and opsin genes in Mnemiopsis leidyi: a new view of ctenophore photocytes. BMC Biol 10, 107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-10-107