Skip to main content

A subgroup of plant aquaporins facilitate the bi-directional diffusion of As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3across membranes



Arsenic is a toxic and highly abundant metalloid that endangers human health through drinking water and the food chain. The most common forms of arsenic in the environment are arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)). As(V) is a non-functional phosphate analog that enters the food chain via plant phosphate transporters. Inside cells, As(V) becomes reduced to As(III) for subsequent extrusion or compartmentation. Although much is known about As(III) transport and handling in microbes and mammals, the transport systems for As(III) have not yet been characterized in plants.


Here we show that the Nodulin26-like Intrinsic Proteins (NIPs) AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1 from Arabidopsis thaliana, OsNIP2;1 and OsNIP3;2 from Oryza sativa, and LjNIP5;1 and LjNIP6;1 from Lotus japonicus are bi-directional As(III) channels. Expression of these NIPs sensitized yeast cells to As(III) and antimonite (Sb(III)), and direct transport assays confirmed their ability to facilitate As(III) transport across cell membranes. On medium containing As(V), expression of the same NIPs improved yeast growth, probably due to increased As(III) efflux. Our data furthermore provide evidence that NIPs can discriminate between highly similar substrates and that they may have differential preferences in the direction of transport. A subgroup of As(III) permeable channels that group together in a phylogenetic tree required N-terminal truncation for functional expression in yeast.


This is the first molecular identification of plant As(III) transport systems and we propose that metalloid transport through NIPs is a conserved and ancient feature. Our observations are potentially of great importance for improved remediation and tolerance of plants, and may provide a key to the development of low arsenic crops for food production.


Arsenic is widespread in the Earth's crust and is highly available in the biosphere. Arsenic is acutely toxic to all organisms and is rated as a group I human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research of Cancer [1]. Due to its high bioavailability and toxicity, arsenic is considered a global health hazard. Contaminated drinking water is the main source of arsenic intake in several parts of the world. In Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Chile, China, Hungary, India, Mexico, Peru, Thailand, and the United States of America, arsenic concentrations higher than the permissible levels have been reported and negative effects on human health have been documented [2]. The second largest source of arsenic for humans is through ingestion of food that has accumulated arsenic due to the irrigation of crop plants with polluted water [3]. In Argentina, arsenic concentrations of 300–400 parts per billion (ppb) were measured in soup and maize porridge [4] in villages where the drinking water was about 200 ppb [4, 5], a concentration that is already considerably higher than the upper limit for drinking water of 10 ppb as recommended by the World Health Organization [2]. It is estimated that, worldwide, 1–24% of the tolerable intake of inorganic arsenic is solely due to the consumption of arsenic-containing rice [6]. Consequently, a detailed understanding of arsenic uptake and detoxification in plants is of great interest and is important for strategies in plant biotechnology for designing safer crops as well as for generating plants for the use in phytoremediation [7].

Arsenate (As(V)) is the prevailing arsenic species in aerated soils. As(V) is a non-functional phosphate analog that is taken up via plant phosphate transporters [8]. Inside the plant, most of the As(V) is reduced to arsenite (As(III)) via arsenate reductases [9, 10]. As(III) reacts with sulfhydryl groups in cysteine residues and the imidazolium nitrogen in histidine residues leading to interference with general protein function [11]. To control As(III) levels in the cytoplasm, As(III) can be conjugated to phytochelatins [12] and probably sequestered into vacuoles by ABC transporters [13]. Most of the vacuolar arsenic however is inorganic As(III) [14, 15]. In Arabidopsis, As(III) constitutes up to 70% of total arsenic and appears to be the main transported species [16]. Transporters involved in As(III) distribution and sequestration at the cellular level are still unknown. At the whole-plant level, arsenic can be transported from root to shoot via the vascular system. In the xylem sap, the predominant arsenic species are inorganic As(III) and As(V) [17, 18] but methylated species are also present at low concentrations [17, 19].

Recently, aquaglyceroporins from microbes and mammals have been shown to facilitate the movement of As(III) and the related metalloid antimonite (Sb(III)) across cell membranes (as reviewed in [20]). Moreover, in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa (rice), members of the Nodulin26-like Intrinsic Protein (NIP) subfamily of plant aquaporins, AtNIP5;1 and OsNIP2;1, have been localized to the plasma membrane in planta and were shown to play physiologically important roles in the uptake of the nutritionally important metalloids boron and silicon, respectively [21, 22]. Finally, competition studies for the uptake of As(III) with glycerol in rice led to the suggestion that As(III) is also transported through members of the aquaporin family in plants [23]. Based on these observations and the fact that members of the NIP subfamily are believed to be the functional equivalents of aquaglyceroporins, we hypothesized that NIPs may be As(III) transporters. To test this prediction directly, we cloned various NIP isoforms from A. thaliana, Lotus japonicus, and O. sativa and expressed them in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) as a heterologous test system for metalloid transport. Our data demonstrate that the capacity to channel As(III) and Sb(III) is conserved in the NIPII subgroup in plants. Expression of specific NIPs was found to sensitize yeast cells to As(III) and Sb(III) and caused increased As(III) uptake into yeast. On medium containing As(V), expression of the same NIP isoforms improved growth, probably due to increased efflux of As(III) accumulating in the yeast cells upon As(V) reduction. Strikingly, a number of NIP isoforms proved particularly potent in releasing As(III) from yeast cells exposed to As(V), suggesting that specific NIPs could play a role in As(III) detoxification in plants.


Expression of specific NIPs from Arabidopsis sensitizes yeast Δfps1to As(III) and Sb(III)

To test whether plant aquaporin homologs transport As(III) and Sb(III), AtNIP1;1, AtNIP2;1, AtNIP5;1, AtNIP6;1 and AtNIP7;1 were heterologously expressed in the aquaglyceroporin deficient Δfps1 yeast mutant. As As(III) and Sb(III) enter yeast cells through Fps1p [24, 25], Δfps1 cells are characterized by low influx and enhanced resistance towards these metalloids. As positive controls, we used AQP9 from rat (rAQP9) and ScFPS1 that reverse metalloid tolerance of Δfps1 cells [24, 26]. Yeast transformants were plated on medium containing various concentrations of As(III) or Sb(III) and growth was scored (Figure 1). Growth of yeast expressing rAQP9 was reduced on medium containing 2 mM As(III) and completely repressed in the presence of 6 mM As(III), whereas the control yeast transformed with the empty vector grew well at concentrations up to 9 mM As(III). Yeast transformed with ScFPS1 showed reduced growth at 6 and 9 mM As(III) (Figure 1A). On medium containing Sb(III), growth of yeast transformed with rAQP9 was strongly affected whereas the control grew well at 30 mM Sb(III) (Figure 1B). Yeast cells expressing AtNIP7;1 were strongly Sb(III)-sensitive (Figure 1B) but only slightly As(III)-sensitive (Figures 1 and 2A). In contrast, none of the other plant aquaporin isoforms appeared to sensitize yeast cells to As(III) or Sb(III) (Figure 1). It was previously reported that, for functional expression of certain NIP isoforms in yeast, it is necessary to truncate parts of their hydrophilic N-terminal domain [27]. Therefore, we genetically engineered N-terminally truncated versions of several NIPs including Atnip1;1Δ2–44, Atnip2;1Δ2–37, Atnip5;1Δ2–67, Atnip6;1Δ2–69 and Atnip7;1Δ2–35. Importantly, yeast expressing the truncated Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 showed strong sensitivity towards As(III) (Figure 1A) whereas growth of these cells was only slightly affected by Sb(III) (Figure 1B). On the other hand, expression of Atnip7;1Δ2–35 resulted in a very similar growth phenotype as expression of the full length AtNIP7;1, both on As(III)- and Sb(III)-containing plates (Figures 1 and 2A). AtNIP1;1 has previously been functionally expressed in yeast as a full-length protein [28]. Neither full length AtNIP1;1 nor truncated Atnip1;1Δ2–44 affected metalloid sensitivity (Figure 1). Similarly, expression of AtNIP2;1 or Atnip2;1Δ2–37 (Figure 1), or a truncated version of AtNIP6;1 lacking only 28 aa of the N-terminal domain (Atnip6;1Δ2–29), had no impact on metalloid sensitivity (discussed in the following).

Figure 1

Yeast expressing specific Arabidopsis aquaporin homologs display sensitivity to arsenite (As(III)) and antimonite (Sb(III)). Δfps1 (background W303-1A) cells were transformed with the empty vector pYES2.1 (control) or aquaporin homologs rAQP9, ScFPSI, AtNIP1;1, Atnip1;1Δ2–44, AtNIP2;1, Atnip2;1Δ2–37, AtNIP5;1, Atnip5;1Δ2–67, AtNIP6;1, Atnip6;1Δ2–69, AtNIP7;1 or Atnip7;1Δ2–35 and spotted at an A600 of 0.01 on medium containing various concentrations of (A) As(III) or (B) Sb(III) as indicated. Growth was recorded after 5 days at 30°C. All data were duplicated in at least two independent experiments with consistent results.

Figure 2

Arabidopsis aquaporins mediate arsenic influx into yeast as monitored by growth and transport assays. (A) Growth assay. Plasmids expressing aquaporin homologs rAQP9, AtNIP5;1, Atnip5;1Δ2–67, AtNIP6;1, Atnip6;1Δ2–29, Atnip6;1Δ2–69, AtNIP7;1 or Atnip7;1Δ 2–35 as well as an empty vector control (pYES2.1) were transformed into Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1. The transformants were grown in liquid medium and 10-fold serial dilutions of the cultures were spotted on agar plates with or without arsenite (As(III)). Growth was monitored after 2 to 3 days at 30°C. (B) As(III) uptake. The Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 mutant harboring the empty pYES2.1 plasmid or plasmids expressing the indicated proteins were exposed to As(III) and intracellular arsenic levels were determined as described in Methods. The data shown represent the average of at least three independent experiments and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Expression of specific NIPs from Arabidopsis sensitizes the Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1to As(III) and facilitates As(III) uptake

Yeast cells are equipped with highly sophisticated arsenic detoxification mechanisms including the arsenate reductase Acr2p, the plasma membrane localized As(III) extrusion transporter Acr3p, and the vacuolar ABC transporter Ycf1p (as reviewed in [29]). Consequently, yeast is relatively resistant towards externally supplied arsenic and addition of millimolar concentrations of As(III) to the medium was needed to score growth reduction of Δfps1 cells expressing Atnip5;1Δ2–67, Atnip6;1Δ2–69, AtNIP7;1 and Atnip7;1Δ2–35 (see Figure 1). Such a concentration range is rather rare in the plant's environment. In addition, the resulting high-concentration gradient across the yeast plasma membrane could force As(III) and Sb(III) to permeate the channels. Therefore, we expressed specific aquaporin isoforms in the Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 yeast mutant that is defective in As(III) detoxification and displays enhanced As(III) sensitivity [24]. Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 cells expressing rAQP9, Atnip5;1Δ2–67, Atnip6;1Δ2–69, AtNIP7;1 and Atnip7;1Δ2–35 displayed increased As(III) sensitivity compared with the empty vector control whereas cells expressing full-length AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1 were not different from the control (Figure 2A).

We next tested the ability of these NIPs to transport As(III) in direct uptake measurements. The Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 mutant has a low level of As(III) influx (Figure 2B). Expression of rAQP9, Atnip5;1Δ2–67, Atnip6;1Δ2–69, AtNIP7;1 and Atnip7;1Δ2–35 led to a significant increase in As(III) uptake after 30 and 60 minutes of exposure. The amount of As(III) taken up by the different transformants corresponded well with the degree of As(III) sensitivity seen when growing the respective transformant on As(III)-containing medium (rAQP9 > Atnip5;1Δ2–67 > Atnip6;1Δ2–69 > Atnip7;1Δ2–35AtNIP7;1; see Figure 2A and 2B). Moreover, we note that N-terminal truncation of AtNIP7;1 only affected As(III) transport to a minor extent (Figure 2B), which is in line with the observed phenotypes (Figure 2A). Finally, the relatively low level of As(III) influx into cells expressing full-length or truncated AtNIP7;1 is consistent with the observation that sensitivity is only clearly visible in the sensitized Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 mutant.

Expression of specific NIPs from Arabidopsis improves growth of Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1on medium containing As(V)

As(V) enters yeast cells via phosphate transporters. To avoid interference with phosphate assimilation and metabolism, yeast, like other organisms, reduces As(V) to the more mobile As(III) for subsequent extrusion and sequestration, as reviewed in [29]. The Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 yeast mutant lacks transport systems for As(III) and, as the result of the action of Acr2p, accumulates As(III) in the presence of externally supplied As(V). Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 is therefore more sensitive towards externally supplied As(V) [24]. When transformed with the empty vector, growth of Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 was severely affected by 50 μM As(V) (Figure 3). Similar growth was recorded for cells expressing full-length AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1, which also did not facilitate As(III) influx (see Figure 1). In contrast, the expression of rAQP9, Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 rendered cells more resistant to externally supplied As(V) (Figure 3). Cells expressing rAQP9 grew slightly better on As(V) than control cells whereas cells expressing Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 were able to grow in the presence of up to 0.2 mM As(V). The fact that certain NIPs can improve growth in the presence of As(V) strongly suggests that they mediate As(III) efflux and supports the notion that these proteins are bi-directional channels. Expressing AtNIP7;1 did not improve As(V) resistance compared with the empty vector control. Strikingly, although expression of rAQP9 resulted in more severe growth inhibition on medium containing As(III) than expression of Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 (Figure 2A), yeast transformed with Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 grew much better on medium containing As(V) than those transformed with rAQP9 (Figure 3). This observation suggests that AtNIP5;1, AtNIP6;1 and rAQP9 may have different preferences regarding the direction of transport.

Figure 3

Expression of Arabidopsis aquaporin homologs improves yeast growth in the presence of arsenate (As(V)). Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 transformed with the empty vector pYES2.1 (control) or the indicated aquaporin homologs were spotted at an A600 of 0.01 on medium containing various concentrations of As(V) as indicated. Growth was recorded after 6 days at 30°C.

The capacity of NIP homologs to transport As(III) and Sb(III) is conserved across plant species

To gain more functional understanding of the NIP proteins, we first performed a phylogenetic analysis including 33 NIP homologs from various species, using rat AQP9 as an out-group (Figure 4). The phylogenetic analyses support, and refine further, the subdivision of the NIP subfamily of the aquaporin superfamily into the two subgroups NIPI and NIPII [3033]. Together, the phylogenetic analysis, transport assays, and phenotypic data presented above, suggested that the capacity to facilitate diffusion of As(III) and Sb(III) across membranes is associated with members of the NIPII subgroup. To substantiate our hypothesis, one isoform of subgroup I (OsNIP1;1) and three isoforms of subgroup II (OsNIP2;1, OsNIP2;2 and OsNIP3;2) from rice were expressed in yeast and tested for their permeability towards As(III). Expression of OsNIP2;1 and OsNIP3;2 sensitized yeast to As(III) (Figure 5A) and Sb(III) (data not shown), whereas their expression improved growth of Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 on As(V)-containing medium (Figure 5B). Expression of OsNIP2;2 produced moderate As(III) and Sb(III) sensitivities (Figure 5A and data not shown). In contrast, OsNIP1;1 expression did not affect growth at all (data not shown). Finally, direct transport assays confirmed that the increased sensitivity of cells expressing OsNIP2;1 towards As(III) was the result of increased influx into those cells (Figure 5C).

Figure 4

The consensus phylogram from the Bayesian phylogenetic inference of 33 NIP isoforms from various plant species. Rat AQP9 (rAQP9) was used as an out-group. Support values are given below the branches as Bayesian posterior probabilities or jackknife values from the parsimony analysis (cut-off threshold corresponding to 50% for both); the latter is specified as applicable. The scale given below the phylogram refers to expected changes per site. The NIP proteins tested in this paper are in bold and those that transport As(III) are marked with an asterisk (*). The NIPI and NIPII subgroups are indicated with a vertical bar and an arrow indicates the hypothetical point in evolution where the NIPI subgroup may have lost the capacity to transport metalloids.

Figure 5

Growth of yeast cells expressing aquaporin homologs from Oryza sativa. Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 transformed with the empty vector pYES2.1 (control) or rAQP9, OsNIP2;1, OsNIP2;2 or OsNIP3;2 were spotted at an A600 of 0.01 on medium containing various concentrations of (A) As(III) or (B) As(V) as indicated. Growth was recorded after 4 days at 30°C. (C) OsNIP2;1 mediates uptake of As(III) into yeast. As(III) transport was measured as described in Methods.

Lack of competitive uptake between As(III) and B(OH)3 or Si(OH)4 into yeast cells expressing AtNIP5;1 and OsNIP2;1

OsNIP2;1 and AtNIP5;1 were earlier identified as physiologically important Si(OH)4 and B(OH)3 channels in rice [22] and Arabidopsis [21], respectively. When expressed in oocytes, AtNIP5;1 mediated the uptake of B(OH)3 and OsNIP2;1 mediated the uptake of Si(OH)4. Here we demonstrated that As(III) is an additional and common substrate for both proteins. To address whether there is selectivity for the uptake of one metalloid over another, we exposed yeast cells expressing OsNIP2;1 to As(III) alone or together with various concentrations of Si(OH)4. However, there was no significant difference in the uptake of As(III), even at a 10-fold higher concentration of Si(OH)4 over As(III) (data not shown). Similarly, no significant difference in As(III) uptake through Atnip5;1Δ2–67 could be measured when yeast cells were exposed to both As(III) and B(OH)3 even at a 10-fold higher concentration of B(OH)3 over As(III) (data not shown). Higher concentrations of Si(OH)4 in the uptake assay cannot be used because of polymerization of monosilic acid to polysilicic acid, and higher concentration of B(OH)3 will lower the pH of the medium. Thus, at physiologically relevant concentrations of Si(OH)4 and B(OH)3, no measurable competition for the uptake of As(III) could be detected.

Proper functional expression of some NIP isoforms in yeast requires deletion of the N-terminal hydrophilic domain

As shown above, N-terminal truncation allows functional expression of certain NIPs in yeast. To test whether truncation is necessary for proper expression of NIPs in yeast, we extracted microsomal membranes from Δfps1 and Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 cells transformed with AtNIP6;1, Atnip6;1Δ2–29 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69 and probed the extracts by Western-blot analysis using an anti-AtNIP6;1 specific antibody (Figure 6). The antibody was raised against a peptide corresponding to a sequence in the C-terminal end of the protein (Per Kjellbom and Urban Johanson, personal communication). Therefore, the signal on a Western blot should reflect the relative abundance of full-length and truncated versions of AtNIP6;1 in these extracts. In microsomal membranes from yeast transformed with full-length AtNIP6;1 or both truncated versions, a clear signal could be detected between 35 and 55 kD, which might represent the oligomeric forms of the respective protein (Figure 6, arrowheads). The bands corresponding to the truncated forms of AtNIP6;1 migrated faster, as expected from the lower molecular weight due to deletion of the N-terminal 28 and 68 aa, respectively and the monomeric forms were also detected (Figure 6, arrows). Truncation of aa 2–29 had little effect on protein levels, whereas truncation of aa 2–69 resulted in higher amount compared with full length AtNIP6;1. We note that the various AtNIP6;1 forms did not migrate according to their molecular size, a phenomenon commonly observed for proteins of the aquaporin family [34, 35]. The amount of the heterologous proteins was generally lower in the triple mutant Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 than in Δfps1.

Figure 6

Detection by Western blotting of AtNIP6;1, Atnip6;1Δ 2–29 and Atnip6;1Δ 2–69 expressed in yeast. We ran 20 μg of microsomal membrane proteins from (a) Δfps1 and (b) Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 transformed with the empty vector or AtNIP6;1, Atnip6;1Δ2–29 or Atnip6;1Δ2–69 on 12% SDS polyacrylamid gels. Proteins were (A) stained with commassie brilliant blue or (B) transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for probing with an anti-AtNIP6;1 specific antibody. M, PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder (Fermentas). The arrows point towards bands that probably represent monomeric forms of Atnip6;1Δ2–29 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69. Arrowheads point towards bands that probably represent oligomeric forms of the proteins.

Interestingly, the necessity to remove part of the N-terminal domain does not seem to apply to all members of the NIPII subgroup, as AtNIP7;1, OsNIP3;2 and OsNIP2;1 could be functionally expressed in yeast as full-length proteins (Figures 2 and 5). We therefore hypothesized that the necessity to truncate the N-terminal domain for functional expression in yeast applies to a subpopulation within the NIPII subgroup.

To substantiate this notion, we cloned two additional NIPII homologs from the legume L. japonicus. Primers were designed according to Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) sequences of the N- and the C-termini of probable major intrinsic proteins of L. japonicus from the databases [36]. According to their close sequence similarity to Arabidopsis AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1 (Figure 4) and because of a missing nomenclature for aquaporins in L. japonicus, we named them LjNIP5;1 and LjNIP6;1. The full-length coding sequences were submitted to GenBank [37] and are available under accession numbers EU294214 and EU294215, respectively. Expression of the N-terminally truncated versions of both LjNIP5;1 and LjNIP6;1 (Ljnip5;1Δ2–72 and Ljnip6;1Δ2–59) drastically sensitized Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 cells to As(III) whereas expression of the corresponding full length clones did not (LjNIP5;1) or only to a moderate extent (LjNIP6;1) (Figure 7A). The truncated versions also sensitized cells to Sb(III) (data not shown). When As(V) was supplied to the growth medium, the expression of Lotus Ljnip5;1Δ2–72 and Ljnip6;1Δ2–59 increased growth compared with control cells transformed with the empty vector (Figure 7B). Hence, truncating the N-terminus of LjNIPs resulted in As(III) transport, similar to what was observed for AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1.

Figure 7

N-terminal truncation is required for functional expression in yeast of specific Lotus japonicus aquaporin homologs. Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1 transformed with the empty vector pYES2.1 (control) or rAQP9, LjNIP5;1, Ljnip5;1Δ2–59, LjNIP6;1 or Ljnip6;1Δ2–72 were spotted at an A600 of 0.01 on medium containing various concentrations of (A) As(III) or (B) As(V) as indicated. Growth was recorded after 4 days at 30°C.

Discussion and conclusion

Aquaglyceroporins from bacteria, yeast, protozoa and mammals have been shown to facilitate transport of the metalloids As(III) and Sb(III) across cell membranes (as reviewed in [20]). Here, we demonstrate that members of the NIP subfamily of plant aquaporins, which are believed to be the functional equivalents to microbial and mammalian aquaglyceroporins, mediate As(III) and Sb(III) transport when expressed in yeast. We conclude that the capacity of aquaporins to transport As(III) and Sb(III) is also well conserved in plants.

It has been reported that truncating parts of the hydrophilic N-terminal domain of certain NIPs is necessary to achieve functional expression in yeast and that the N-terminus is not required for the transport activity itself [27]. Our data support these findings as N-terminal truncation of AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1 was necessary for functional expression in yeast (Figures 1, 2 and 3). On the other hand, truncation of AtNIP7;1 had little effect on its transport capacity (Figures 1, 2 and 3), supporting the interpretation that the hydrophilic N-terminal domain is not important for basic channel function. Interestingly, the necessity to remove part of the N-terminal domain does not apply to all members of the NIPII subgroup, as AtNIP7;1, OsNIP3;2 and OsNIP2;1 could be functionally expressed in yeast as full-length proteins (Figures 1, 2, 3 and 5). This is in accordance with data from functional expression of another full-length NIPII isoform from Cucurbita pepo (CpNIP) in yeast [38]. Hence, the necessity to truncate the N-terminal domain for functional expression in yeast appears to apply to a subpopulation within the NIPII subgroup.

In contrast to yeast, AtNIP5;1 and AtNIP6;1 were successfully expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes as full-length proteins [21, 31]. In fact, it is not known why truncation is required for functional expression in yeast. Our Western-blot analysis of AtNIP6;1 suggests that the physical expression could be part of the reason; truncation of aa 2–69 resulted in increased protein levels in yeast membranes when compared with full-length AtNIP6;1. We can, however, not exclude that other reasons may contribute to this phenomenon. Deletion of the N-terminal domain could influence the targeting of the protein in the yeast secretory pathway. Alternatively, the N-terminal domain could function in gating the channel and components of a putative post-translational regulation mechanism displacing an inhibitory domain may be absent in yeast. A function of the N-terminal domain in gating has been ascribed to the yeast endogenous Fps1p [39, 40], and phosphorylation affects Fps1p transport activity [25]. Phosphorylation of plant and mammalian aquaporins was also shown to modulate transport function as well as localization [4143] and GmNOD26 of Glycine max is phosphorylated during specific developmental stages [44]. Strikingly, all isoforms that need to be truncated for functional expression in yeast contain a consensus Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation site [32] consisting of a Pro-X-Ser/Thr-Pro motif in their N-terminus. This motif is missing in other NIPII homologs. The conservation of this site (Table 1) suggests that phosphorylation is required for functional expression and that phosphorylation may have a regulatory role in plants. However, deletion of the conserved MAPK site in the case of AtNIP6;1 (Atnip6;1Δ2–29) and subsequent expression in yeast did not result in As(III) transport activity (Figures 2 and 3). Hence, the phosphorylation site itself is not identical with a potential inhibitory domain.

Table 1 N-terminal sequences of various plant NIPII isoforms containing a conserved MAPK phosphorylation site

Based on the amino acids forming the selectivity filter, the NIP subfamily of plant aquaporins has been divided into two subgroups, NIPI and NIPII [3033]. According to this classification, NIPI group homologs are characterized by the consensus motif W I/V A/G R (Table 2). The NIPII group was initially defined for homologs characterized by the consensus motif A I/V A/G R. Later, OsNIP2;1, OsNIP2;2 and OsNIP3;2 were also placed in the NIPII subgroup [32], despite having a slightly different pattern of amino acids in their selective filter. Furthermore, the amino acid motif in the constriction region of LjNIP6;1 is distinct from the aforementioned examples but similar to MtNIP3 and MtNIP4 from Medicago trunculata (Table 2), all of which group to NIPII in our phylogenetic analysis (Figure 4). However, common to all NIPII isoforms, is a small hydrophilic amino acid residue at the first position, where animal, microbial and other plant NIPs have either an aromatic F or a W. The division into NIPI and NIPII also appears to be a valuable grouping from a functional perspective, as OsNIP2;1, OsNIP2;2 and OsNIP3;2 also proved to channel As(III) and Sb(III) similar to other NIPII proteins tested in this study. However, the diverse patterns of amino acids in the selective filters of all As(III) and Sb(III) transporting aquaporin homologs from various organisms (Table 2) strongly suggests that other features must be important for the selectivity of these channels. Interestingly, NIP isoforms that facilitate the diffusion of other hydroxylated metalloids such as B(OH)3 [21] and Si(OH)4 [22] also belong to the NIPII subgroup (Figure 4). Thus, accumulating evidence suggests that in plants, NIPII aquaporins are metalloid channels. In contrast, none of the isoforms of the NIPI subgroup tested here mediated As(III) transport. Members of the NIPI subgroup are expressed upon symbiosis with rhizobium and localized to the peribacteroid membrane in legume plants [4446] and in plants interacting with mycorrhizal fungi [47]. Recently, AtNIP2;1, a member of the NIPI subgroup in Arabidopsis was shown to be induced at transcriptional level upon exposure to anoxic conditions [48]. When heterologously expressed in oocytes, AtNIP2;1 significantly increased the permeability for lactic acid, whereas only a minor permeability for water and glycerol, the 'conventional' aquaporin substrates, was recorded [48].

Table 2 As(III) and Sb(III) transporting aquaporin homologs, comparison of the constriction region and summary of transport properties

Glycerol has often been used as a substrate to monitor NIP channel activity [27, 28, 44, 49]. Recent studies have shown that As(III) and Sb(III) exist as hydroxylated As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3 at neutral pH [50, 51]. Moreover, As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3 show very strong structural similarity both to each other and to glycerol [50]. Hence, it was proposed that As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3 transit through aquaglyceroporins through the same path as glycerol [50]. Similar conclusions could be drawn for NIPs in plants. However, in plants there is no direct evidence for a physiological role of glycerol transport through NIPs. Instead, metalloids may in fact represent the primary substrate of NIPII homologs. Notably, experimental data show that permeability for glycerol does not always coincide with the transport capacity for As(III) and Sb(III): (i) AtNIP1;1 transports glycerol [28] but does not seem to transport either As(III) or Sb(III) (this work); and (ii) OsNIP2;1 is shown here to be permeable for As(III) but is impermeable for glycerol [22]. The variability in the constriction region [33] along with other structural features of the channel path of NIPs seem to play a role in the discrimination between structurally highly similar solutes such as As(III), Sb(III) and glycerol. Interestingly, our phylogenetic analysis with rAQP9 as an out-group suggests that an ancestral NIP was capable of metalloid transport and that this capacity was lost in NIPI proteins (Figure 4). Nevertheless, this inference will require rigorous testing of more NIPs for the presence or absence of metalloid transport.

Due to the close structural similarity between As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3, it was proposed that any difference observed in the toxicological properties of these metalloids must be related to processes other than cellular uptake [50]. However, in our study, expression of AtNIP7;1 only had a marginal effect on yeast growth on medium containing As(III), whereas on medium containing Sb(III), growth of the same transformants was strongly impaired (Figure 1). For yeast expressing Atnip5;1Δ2–67 and Atnip6;1Δ2–69, the opposite effects were seen with high sensitivity towards As(III) but only a mild increase in sensitivity towards Sb(III) (Figure 1). Thus, despite the high structural similarity of the two metalloids, our data demonstrate that NIPs can to some extent discriminate between As(III) and Sb(III) for selective transport.

OsNIP2;1 was originally identified as a Si(OH)4 specific channel without significant permeability for glycerol [22], and AtNIP5;1 was shown to be crucial for the uptake of B(OH)3 [21]. AtNIP5;1 and OsNIP2;1 are localized to the distal plasma membrane domain of the endodermis in Arabidopsis roots [21], and endodermis and exodermis of rice roots [22]. These cell layers represent a border for apoplastic transport. Nutrients taken up into the shoot via the vascular system have to enter the symplast by transport across the plasma membrane. Here we show that OsNIP2;1 and AtNIP5;1 are also permeable for the toxic metalloids As(III) and Sb(III). From a physiological point of view, the permeability for both beneficial (silicon) and essential (boron) nutrients as well as toxic substrates could pose a major problem for the plant; in the presence of arsenic in the soil solution, the expressed channels could be responsible for the uptake of toxic As(III). This would be problematic for rice, in particular, as rice roots grow in low oxygen soils, favoring the formation of the reduced form As(III). Hence, under conditions of low Si in the soil, leading to induction of OsNIP2;1, and under concomitant presence of As(III), rice roots are likely to take up As(III) via OsNIP2;1. Our data indicate that under physiologically relevant concentrations, Si(OH)4 does not compete with As(III) for uptake through OsNIP2;1, suggesting that OsNIP2;1 has a high capacity for the transport of both metalloids. It will be important to investigate if OsNIP2;1 and AtNIP5;1 are differentially regulated by As(III) versus Si(OH)4 and B(OH)3 in rice and Arabidopsis, respectively.

Transport of As(III) through NIPs and translocation to the shoot is potentially interesting for strategies of phytoremediation and the removal of arsenic from contaminated sites. In rice, uptake and translocation of Si(OH)4 is achieved by the concerted action of OsNIP2;1 and OsLsi2, the latter displaying homology to plant citrate transporters and to the Escherichia coli ArsB As(III) efflux transporter [22, 52]. Rice Lsi2 is localized to the proximal plasma membrane domains of endodermis and exodermis cells. Si(OH)4, entering the cells via OsNIP2;1 is actively transported out of the cell and into the apoplastic continuum of the water transporting xylem elements for long-distance transport to the shoot [22]. However, expression of OsLsi2 or its closest homologs Os10g0547500 and At1g02260 did not affect yeast growth in the presence of As(III) or As(V) (data not shown). Although our data do not indicate that OsLsi2 and its homologs transport As(III) in yeast, it will be important to investigate this issue in plants.

Mammalian AQP9 was earlier shown to transport As(III) when expressed in yeast and Xenopus oocytes [26, 53, 54]. Interestingly, mono-methylated As(III), which is formed inside liver cells, was transported three times more efficiently than inorganic As(III), which led us to suggest that AQP9 could serve a function in arsenic detoxification [20]. Here, rAQP9 was very efficient in the uptake of As(III) but less effective in releasing the As(III) produced by yeast cells through the reduction of As(V). In contrast, NIP isoforms investigated here were less effective than rAQP9 in the uptake of As(III), but proved superior in supporting yeast growth in the presence of As(V). Plant cells primarily take up the oxidized form As(V) via high affinity phosphate transporters at the plasma membrane. It was recently reported that roots of rice and tomato plants have the capacity to efflux As(III) at high rate, when provided with As(V) in the growth medium [55]. The efficiency of some NIPIIs in extruding As(III) seen here supports the hypothesis that NIPII homologs may play a physiological role in arsenic detoxification. Such a role has been ascribed to the aquaglyceroporin AqpS from the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti [56]. Although this work demonstrates that specific plant aquaporins facilitate As(III) and Sb(III) transport, more work is needed to understand the role of As(III) transport through NIPII homologs in planta and we are currently putting efforts into this.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that specific plant NIPs transport As(III) and Sb(III) across cell membranes. Since the influx and efflux of toxic compounds is intimately linked to toxicity and detoxification, the identification of the proteins involved in this process provides a first important step towards the development of strategies for improving tolerance and remediation by plants.


Yeast strains and growth

W303-1A derived yeast strains (MATa ura3-1 leu2-3/112 trp1-1 his3-11/15 ade2-1 can1-100 GAL SUC2 mal0 fps1Δ::LEU2 [57] and MATa ura3-1 leu2-3/112 trp1-1 his3-11/15 ade2-1 can1-100 GAL SUC2 mal0 fps1Δ::LEU2 ycf1Δ::loxP acr3Δ::loxP-kanMX-loxP [58]) were used in this study. Yeast cells were grown on synthetic medium containing 2% glucose (SD) or 2% galactose (SG), 50 mM succinic acid/Tris base, pH 5.5, 0.7% yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids (Difco) and supplemented with 0.003% each tryptophane, leucine, adenine and histidine according to the auxothrophic requirements of specific strains. Yeast cells were diluted in sterile water to an A600 of 0.01 (or various dilutions as indicated), and 10 μl were spotted on solid SG-medium containing various concentrations of sodium arsenite (Sigma), sodium arsenate (Aldrich) or potassium antimonyl tartrate (Hopkins and Williams LTD) as indicated. After 2 to 6 days of incubation at 30°C, differences in growth were scored. Data were duplicated in at least two independent experiments with consistent results.

Cloning of plant aquaporins

The open reading frames of plant sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers (Table 3). The resulting PCR products were cloned into the yeast expression vector pYES2.1 (Invitrogen) and verified by DNA sequencing. Some of the open reading frames were cloned using a uracil-excision based cloning as described by Nour-Eldin et al. [59]. Oligonucleotides (Table 3) matching the EST sequences AV764898, AV419109 and BP048179 were used in a PCR on single-stranded cDNA prepared from five-week-old L. japonicus seedlings. Two independent PCRs for each aquaporin were performed. The PCR products of the expected size were sub-cloned and three clones were sequenced for each gene. Two full-length sequences were obtained and submitted to GenBank under EU294214 and EU294215[37] for LjNIP5;1 and LjNIP6;1, respectively.

Table 3 GenBank accessions and primers used for the cloning of the various plant cDNAs

Membrane protein extraction and Western blotting

S. cerevisiaefps1 and Δfps1 Δacr3 Δycf1) expressing individual plant genes or transformed with the empty vector pYES2.1 were pre-cultured over night in selective medium and expression was induced in a subsequent over night culture in 1% yeast extract (Difco), 2% peptone (Difco) and 2% galactose. Cells were harvested, re-suspended in homogenization buffer (220 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 42 mM EDTA pH 8, 42.5% glycerol, 10 μM ATP and proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) and broken using acid washed glass beads (Sigma). After removal of cell debris by centrifugation (8000 g for 15 minutes), the microsomal membrane fractions were collected at 100,000 g for 1 hour. Pellets were resuspended and homogenized in resuspension buffer (20% glycerol, 100 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA pH 8, 1 mM DTT, and proteinase inhibitor cocktail). Protein concentrations were determined according to Bradford using the assay from Bio-Rad with BSA as standard. We separated 20 μg of membrane protein on SDS-polyacrylamid gels (4% stacking gel; 12% separation gel) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) by electroblotting. Membranes were blocked in 2% milk powder in TBS. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in TBS at 1:500 (anti-NIP6;1 antibody) and 1:10,000 (goat anti-rabbit IgG-AP conjugate, Bio-Rad), respectively. Detection was performed using NBT/BCIP (Promega). Coomassie stained gels were routinely run as loading control.

Arsenic transport assays

Arsenic transport assays were performed essentially as described previously [24]. Briefly, exponentially growing yeast cells in SG medium were exposed to sodium arsenite. Cells were collected at the time points indicated in the figures, washed in ice-cold water and pelleted by centrifugation. The cell pellets were resuspended in water, boiled, centrifuged and the supernatants were collected. The arsenic content of each sample was determined using a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer (SIMAA 6000; Perkin-Elmer) as described previously [60]. For competition assays, equimolar or 10-fold molar excess of Si(OH)4 or B(OH)3 was added together with the As(III). Samples for arsenic content were collected and analyzed as above. All transport assays were performed at least three times and the values are given with SD.

Alignment and phylogenetic analyses

33 sequences corresponding to plant NIP homologs plus rat AQP9 (out-group) were aligned in MAFFT 6.240 [61] and analyzed phylogenetically in MrBayes 3.0 [62] (Bayesian analysis: 5 million generations, 1 tree sampled every 5000 generations, 8 MCMCMC chains and a 50% burn-in) and PAUP 4.0b10 [63] (parsimony analysis: 10,000 random addition sequences with 10 trees held per step and TBR branch swapping with at most 25 trees saved per round; branch support was estimated through 25,000 jackknife replicates). The final alignment consisted of 34 sequences and 315 amino acid residues, 212 (67%) of which were parsimony informative. The 50% majority-rule consensus phylogram computed from the resulting 2500 trees of the Bayesian analysis is shown in Figure 4. In the parsimony analysis, one of the most parsimonious trees of length 1644 was recovered (CI = 0.6150, RI = 0.6941). The support values from the jackknife analysis are superimposed onto the Bayesian tree in Figure 4[64].


  1. 1.

    International Agency for Research of Cancer. []

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization: Fact Sheet Arsenic. []

  3. 3.

    Williams PN, Islam MR, Adomako EE, Raab A, Hossain SA, Zhu YG, Feldmann J, Meharg AA: Increase in rice grain arsenic for regions of Bangladesh irrigating paddies with elevated arsenic in groundwaters. Environ Sci Technol. 2006, 40: 4903-4908. 10.1021/es060222i.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Concha G, Nermell B, Vahter M: Metabolism of inorganic arsenic in children with chronic high arsenic exposure in northern Argentina. Environ Health Perspect. 1998, 106: 355-359. 10.2307/3434042.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Concha G, Nermell B, Vahter M: Spatial and temporal variations in arsenic exposure via drinking-water in northern Argentina. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006, 24: 317-326.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jorhem L, Astrand C, Sundström B, Baxter M, Stokes P, Lewis J, Grawé KP: Elements in rice from the Swedish market: 1. Cadmium, lead and arsenic (total and inorganic). Food Addit Contam. 2007, 28: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tripathi RD, Srivastava S, Mishra S, Singh N, Tuli R, Gupta DK, Maathuis FJM: Arsenic hazards: strategies for tolerance and remediation by plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25: 158-165. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.02.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Meharg AA, Hartley-Whitaker J: Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and non-resistant plant species. New Phytol. 2002, 154: 29-43. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00363.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ellis DR, Gumaelius L, Indriolo E, Pickering IJ, Banks JA, Salt DE: A novel arsenate reductase from the arsenic hyperaccumulating fern Pteris vittata. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 1544-1554. 10.1104/pp.106.084079.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dhankher OP, Rosen BP, McKinney EC, Meagher RB: Hyperaccumulation of arsenic in the shoots of Arabidopsis silenced for arsenate reductase (ACR2). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 5413-5418. 10.1073/pnas.0509770102.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Requejo R, Tena M: Proteome analysis of maize roots reveals that oxidative stress is a main contributing factor to plant arsenic toxicity. Phytochemistry. 2005, 66: 1519-1528. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bluemlein K, Raab A, Meharg AA, Charnock JM, Feldmann J: Can we trust mass spectrometry for determination of arsenic peptides in plants: comparison of LC-ICP and LC-ES-MS/ICP-MS with XANES/EXAFS in analysis of Thunbergia alata. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008, 390: 1739-1751. 10.1007/s00216-007-1724-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bleeker PM, Hakvoort HW, Bliek M, Souer E, Schat H: Enhanced arsenate reduction by a CDC25-like tyrosine phosphatase explains increased phytochelatin accumulation in arsenate-tolerant Holcus lanatus. Plant J. 2006, 45: 917-929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huang ZC: Direct determination of arsenic species in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata by EXAFS. Acta Bot Sin. 2004, 46: 46-50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Raab A, Schat H, Meharg AA, Feldmann J: Uptake, translocation and transformation of arsenate and arsenite in sunflower (Helianthus annuus): formation of arsenic-phytochelatin complexes during exposure to high arsenic concentrations. New Phytol. 2005, 168: 551-558. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01519.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Quaghebeur M, Rengel Z: Arsenic uptake, translocation and speciation in pho1 and pho2 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant. 2004, 120: 280-286. 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0240.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mihucz VG, Tatár E, Virág I, Cseh E, Fodor F, Záray G: Arsenic speciation in xylem sap of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005, 383: 461-466. 10.1007/s00216-005-3325-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang J, Zhao FJ, Meharg AA, Raab A, Feldmann J, McGrath SP: Mechanisms of arsenic hyperaccumulation in Pteris vittata. Uptake kinetics, interactions with phosphate, and arsenic speciation. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130: 1552-1561. 10.1104/pp.008185.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chen RX, Smith BW, Winefordner JD, Tu MS, Kertulis G, Ma QL: Arsenic speciation in Chinese brake fern by ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta. 2004, 504: 199-207. 10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bienert GP, Schüssler MD, Jahn TP: Metalloids: essential, beneficial or toxic? Major intrinsic proteins sort it out. Trends Biochem Sci. 2008, 33: 20-26. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Takano J, Wada M, Ludewig U, Schaaf G, von Wirén N, Fujiwara T: The Arabidopsis major intrinsic protein NIP5;1 is essential for efficient boron uptake and plant development under boron limitation. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 1498-1509. 10.1105/tpc.106.041640.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ma JF, Tamai K, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Konishi S, Katsuhara M, Ishiguro M, Murata Y, Yano M: A silicon transporter in rice. Nature. 2006, 440: 688-691. 10.1038/nature04590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Meharg AA, Jardine L: Arsenite transport into paddy rice (Oryza sativa) roots. New Phytol. 2003, 157: 39-44. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00655.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wysocki R, Chéry CC, Wawrzycka D, Van Hulle M, Cornelis R, Thevelein JM, Tamás MJ: The glycerol channel Fps1p mediates the uptake of arsenite and antimonite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 40: 1391-1401. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02485.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thorsen M, Di Y, Tängemo C, Morillas M, Ahmadpour D, Does Van der C, Wagner A, Johansson E, Boman J, Wysocki R, Tamás MJ: The MAPK Hog1p modulates Fps1p-dependent arsenite uptake and tolerance in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 4400-4410. 10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0315.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu Z, Shen J, Carbrey JM, Mukhopadhyay R, Agre P, Rosen BP: Arsenite transport by mammalian aquaglyceroporins AQP7 and AQP9. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 6053-6058. 10.1073/pnas.092131899.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cabello-Hurtado F, Ramos J: Isolation and functional analysis of the glycerol permease activity of two new nodulin-like intrinsic proteins from salt stressed roots of the halophyte Atriplex nummularia . Plant Sci. 2004, 166: 633-640. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Weig A, Jakob C: Functional identification of the glycerol permease activity of Arabidopsis thaliana NLM1 and NLM2 proteins by heterologous expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2000, 481: 293-298. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02027-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tamás MJ, Wysocki R: Mechanisms involved in metalloid transport and tolerance acquisition. Curr Genet. 2001, 40: 2-12. 10.1007/s002940100234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wallace IS, Roberts DM: Homology modeling of representative subfamilies of Arabidopsis major intrinsic proteins. Classification based on the aromatic/arginine selectivity filter. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 1059-1068. 10.1104/pp.103.033415.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wallace IS, Roberts DM: Distinct transport selectivity of two structural subclasses of the nodulin-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporin channels. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 16826-16834. 10.1021/bi0511888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wallace IS, Choi WG, Roberts DM: The structure, function and regulation of the nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1758: 1165-1175. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bansal A, Sankararamakrishnan R: Homology modeling of major intrinsic proteins in rice, maize and Arabidopsis : comparative analysis of transmembrane helix association and aromatic/arginine selectivity filters. BMC Struct Biol. 2007, 7: 27-10.1186/1472-6807-7-27.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu Z, Carbrey JM, Agre P, Rosen BP: Arsenic trioxide uptake by human and rat aquaglyceroporins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 316: 1178-1185. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pettersson N, Hagström J, Bill RM, Hohmann S: Expression of heterologous aquaporins for functional analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Curr Genet. 2006, 50: 247-255. 10.1007/s00294-006-0092-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    The Lotus Japonicus Genome Sequencing Project Database. []

  37. 37.

    Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler L: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D21-D25. 10.1093/nar/gkl986.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Klebl F, Wolf M, Sauer N: A defect in the yeast plasma membrane urea transporter Dur3p is complemented by CpNIP1, a Nod26-like protein from zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.), and by Arabidopsis thaliana delta-TIP or gamma-TIP. FEBS Lett. 2003, 547: 69-74. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00671-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tamás MJ, Luyten K, Sutherland FC, Hernandez A, Albertyn J, Valadi H, Li H, Prior BA, Kilian SG, Ramos J, Gustafsson L, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S: Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 31: 1087-1104. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01248.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tamás MJ, Karlgren S, Bill RM, Hedflak K, Allegri L, Ferreira M, Thevelein JM, Rydström J, Mullins JG, Hohmann S: A short regulatory domain restricts glycerol transport through yeast Fps1p. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 6337-6345. 10.1074/jbc.M209792200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Johansson I, Karlsson M, Shukla VK, Chrispeels MJ, Larsson C, Kjellbom P: Water transport activity of the plasma membrane aquaporin PM28A is regulated by phosphorylation. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 451-460. 10.1105/tpc.10.3.451.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chaumont F, Moshelion M, Daniels MJ: Regulation of plant aquaporin activity. Biol Cell. 2005, 97 (10): 749-764. 10.1042/BC20040133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Brown D: The ins and outs of aquaporin-2 trafficking. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003, 284 (5): F893-901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Guenther JF, Chanmanivone N, Galetovic MP, Wallace IS, Cobb JA, Roberts DM: Phosphorylation of soybean nodulin 26 on serine 262 enhances water permeability and is regulated developmentally and by osmotic signals. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 981-991. 10.1105/tpc.009787.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dean RM, Rivers RL, Zeidel ML, Roberts DM: Purification and functional reconstitution of soybean nodulin 26. An aquaporin with water and glycerol transport properties. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 347-353. 10.1021/bi982110c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Catalano CM, Lane WS, Sherrier DJ: Biochemical characterization of symbiosome membrane proteins from Medicago truncatula root nodules. Electrophoresis. 2004, 25: 519-531. 10.1002/elps.200305711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Uehlein N, Fileschi K, Eckert M, Bienert GP, Bertl A, Kaldenhoff R: Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and plant aquaporin expression. Phytochemistry. 2007, 68: 122-129. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.09.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Choi WG, Roberts DM: Arabidopsis NIP2;1, a major intrinsic protein transporter of lactic acid induced by anoxic stress. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 24209-24218. 10.1074/jbc.M700982200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wallace IS, Wills DM, Guenther JF, Roberts DM: Functional selectivity for glycerol of the nodulin 26 subfamily of plant membrane intrinsic proteins. FEBS Lett. 2002, 523: 109-112. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02955-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Porquet A, Filella M: Structural evidence of the similarity of Sb(OH)3 and As(OH)3 with glycerol: implications for their uptake. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007, 20: 1269-1276. 10.1021/tx700110m.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ramírez-Solís A, Mukopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Stemmler TL: Experimental and theoretical characterization of arsenite in water: insights into the coordination environment of As-O. Inorg Chem. 2004, 43: 2954-2959. 10.1021/ic0351592.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ma JF, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Tamai K, Konishi S, Fujiwara T, Katsuhara M, Yano M: An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature. 2007, 448: 209-212. 10.1038/nature05964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Liu Z, Carbrey JM, Agre P, Rosen BR: Arsenic trioxide uptake by human and rat aquaglyceroporins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 316: 1178-1185. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liu Z, Styblo M, Rosen BP: Methylarsonous acid transport by aquaglyceroporins. Environ Health Perspect. 2006, 114: 527-531.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Xu XY, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ: Rapid reduction of arsenate in the medium mediated by plant roots. New Phytol. 2007, 176: 590-599. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02195.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Yang HC, Cheng J, Finan TM, Rosen BP, Bhattacharjee H: Novel pathway for arsenic detoxification in the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 6991-6997. 10.1128/JB.187.20.6991-6997.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Thomas BJ, Rothstein R: Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989, 56: 619-630. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Van Aelst L, Hohmann S, Zimmermann FK, Jans AW, Thevelein JM: A yeast homologue of the bovine lens fibre MIP gene family complements the growth defect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant on fermentable sugars but not its defect in glucose-induced RAS-mediated cAMP signalling. EMBO J. 1991, 10: 2095-2104.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Nour-Eldin HH, Hansen BG, Nørholm MH, Jensen JK, Halkier BA: Advancing uracil-excision based cloning towards an ideal technique for cloning PCR fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: e122-10.1093/nar/gkl635.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wagner A, Boman J: Biomonitoring of trace elements in Vietnamese freshwater mussels. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc. 2004, 59: 1127-1134. 10.1016/j.sab.2003.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T: MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 511-518. 10.1093/nar/gki198.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Swofford DL: PAUP*; Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. 2003, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses. []

  65. 65.

    Sanders OI, Rensing C, Kuroda M, Mitra B, Rosen BP: Antimonite is accumulated by the glycerol facilitator GlpF in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3365-3367.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Meng YL, Liu Z, Rosen BP: As(III) and Sb(III) uptake by GlpF and efflux by ArsB in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 18334-18341. 10.1074/jbc.M400037200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Per Kjellbom and Urban Johanson for the generous gift of the anti-NIP6;1 specific antibody. Financial support from the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation by a grant to TPJ (23-03-0103), and support from the Swedish Research Council (VR) and the Swedish National Research School in Genomics and Bioinformatics to MJT are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P Jahn.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

GPB cloned the plant aquaporin isoforms, performed most of the growth assays and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MT performed some of the growth experiments, conducted the uptake assays and participated in writing the manuscript. MDS performed the Western-blotting analysis and participated in writing the manuscript. HRN performed the phylogenetic analyses. AW performed the atomic absorption analysis. MJT and TPJ initiated the project and finalized writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bienert, G.P., Thorsen, M., Schüssler, M.D. et al. A subgroup of plant aquaporins facilitate the bi-directional diffusion of As(OH)3 and Sb(OH)3across membranes . BMC Biol 6, 26 (2008).

Download citation


  • Arsenic
  • Functional Expression
  • Sodium Arsenite
  • Arsenate Reductase
  • Antimonite