Open Access

The structure of a prophenoloxidase (PPO) from Anopheles gambiae provides new insights into the mechanism of PPO activation

Contributed equally
BMC Biology201614:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0225-2

Received: 24 July 2015

Accepted: 23 December 2015

Published: 5 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Phenoloxidase (PO)-catalyzed melanization is a universal defense mechanism of insects against pathogenic and parasitic infections. In mosquitos such as Anopheles gambiae, melanotic encapsulation is a resistance mechanism against certain parasites that cause malaria and filariasis. PO is initially synthesized by hemocytes and released into hemolymph as inactive prophenoloxidase (PPO), which is activated by a serine protease cascade upon recognition of foreign invaders. The mechanisms of PPO activation and PO catalysis have been elusive.

Results

Herein, we report the crystal structure of PPO8 from A. gambiae at 2.6 Å resolution. PPO8 forms a homodimer with each subunit displaying a classical type III di-copper active center. Our molecular docking and mutagenesis studies revealed a new substrate-binding site with Glu364 as the catalytic residue responsible for the deprotonation of mono- and di-phenolic substrates. Mutation of Glu364 severely impaired both the monophenol hydroxylase and diphenoloxidase activities of AgPPO8. Our data suggested that the newly identified substrate-binding pocket is the actual site for catalysis, and PPO activation could be achieved without withdrawing the conserved phenylalanine residue that was previously deemed as the substrate ‘placeholder’.

Conclusions

We present the structural and functional data from a mosquito PPO. Our results revealed a novel substrate-binding site with Glu364 identified as the key catalytic residue for PO enzymatic activities. Our data offered a new model for PPO activation at the molecular level, which differs from the canonical mechanism that demands withdrawing a blocking phenylalanine residue from the previously deemed substrate-binding site. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms of PPO activation and enzymatic catalysis of PO.

Keywords

Innate immunity Melanization Mosquito Type III copper proteins Zymogen activation

Background

Phenoloxidase (PO) is a critical enzyme involved in multiple physiological processes including innate immunity of insects and crustaceans. As the close homolog of arthropod hemocyanins, PO is produced in hemocytes as a zymogen, the prophenoloxidase (PPO) [1]. Upon pathogenic infections or physical injuries, a serine protease cascade is triggered to activate PPO as a local response. The last step of PPO activation involves a trypsin-like enzyme, named PPO-activating proteinase (PAP), which cleaves PPO at a conserved proteolytic cleavage site near the N-terminus to generate active PO [2, 3]. In vitro, PPO can also be activated without proteolytic cleavage by certain chemicals such as ethanol or detergents (e.g. cetylpyridinium chloride, CPC) [46].

In general, the active PO possesses o-hydroxylase (EC 1.14.18.1) and o-diphenoloxidase (EC 1.10.3.1) activities that convert a variety of monophenolic and o-diphenolic substrates to o-quinones [6, 7]. Quinones may act as cross-linkers for wound healing, and they also polymerize to form melanin capsules around parasites and parasitoids [7, 8]. Quinones and other reactive intermediates (e.g. 5,6-dihydroxyindole) directly kill microbial pathogens and parasitoids [9].

POs, together with hemocyanins, tyrosinases, and catechol oxidases, belong to the type III di-copper family of proteins, which share an antiferromagnetically coupled di-copper center [10, 11]. This group of proteins are widely distributed in different organisms: POs in arthropods, tyrosinases in microbes, plants and mammals, catechol oxidases in plants and fungi, and hemocyanins in arthropods and molluscs [1214]. Tyrosinases and catechol oxidases are responsible for browning of fruits and plants, and they may also play a role in defense mechanism in plants and fungi [15]. Mammalian tyrosinase is a major enzyme required for coloring of hair, skin and eyes, and its deficiency and excessive expression could lead to albinism and skin cancer, respectively [7, 16, 17]. Hemocyanins were initially recognized as oxygen carriers in hemolymph [18], but their PO activities and roles in antimicrobial defense were discovered later [6, 19]. In spite of having a similar active site, vital structural and functional differences do exist in these proteins as has been demonstrated in the past decades. Tyrosinases and POs catalyze both the o-hydroxylation and oxidation reactions, but catechol oxidases only possess the oxidase activity [20, 21]. Based on their similarities in the primary and tertiary structures, POs were considered to be evolutionarily more related to arthropod hemocyanins, whereas tyrosinases and catechol oxidases are closer to molluscan hemocyanins [19, 22, 23].

In the catalytic cycle, type III di-copper center goes through three redox states: the reduced deoxy state [Cu(I)-Cu(I)], the oxy state [Cu(II)-O2 2−-Cu(II)] in which a peroxide molecule binds to the two Cu ions in a μ-η22 side-on bridging fashion, and the met state [Cu(II)-OH-Cu(II)] in which the two Cu ions are ligated to a hydroxide ion [10]. The oxy state enzyme is capable of catalyzing both the hydroxylation of monophenols and the oxidation of o-diphenols to o-quinones, while the met state only undertakes the latter diphenol oxidase reaction [10].

PO catalyzed-melanogenesis is indispensable in the immune system of invertebrates [24, 25] and two PPO structures from Manduca sexta and Marsupenaeus japonicus have been investigated [26, 27]. Although these studies on PPO provided important structural and functional insights, the detailed enzymatic mechanism of PO is still undetermined and the fundamentals of PPO activation remain elusive. A. gambiae is a major vector of human malaria parasites in Africa, whose innate immune system protects the mosquito from infection by incompatible malaria parasites [28]. It contains nine PPO genes which are expressed at different tissues and life stages [2932]. Herein, we report the crystal structure of AgPPO8 at 2.6 Å resolution, representing the first structure from a recombinant PPO and the first from a mosquito species. Our structural and functional studies on AgPPO8 revealed a novel substrate-binding pocket that differs from the previously deemed ‘placeholder’ position occupied by a phenylalanine residue, which is conserved in PPOs, but not in molluscan hemocyanins, tyrosinases, or catechol oxidases. We identified E364 as a catalytic residue key to the PO activities. Our data provide new insights into the mechanism of PO catalysis, which could be applicable to other type III di-copper proteins, and suggest a new model for PPO activation at the molecular level.

Results

Overall structure of AgPPO8

The crystal structure of AgPPO8 contains two identical subunits, each comprising 700 residues, which are associated tightly to form a homodimer in the asymmetric unit. The overall structure of the AgPPO8 displays a butterfly shape of  147 × 70 × 60 Å in size (Fig. 1a). Most residues are well defined, except for 40 amino acids that lack electron densities. These include residues 59–65, 580–587, 629–632, and 698–700 in chain A and residues 1, 2, 65–68, 579–587, and 698–700 in chain B. AgPPO8 adopts a similar architecture as that of M. sexta PPO (MsPPO) [26], with the three conserved domains (Fig. 1b). The pro-region (17–81) contains the conserved proteolytic cleavage site (R51*F52). Domain I (1–16, 82–196) is dominant in α-helices. Domain II (197–435) contains the di-copper active site buried in an α-helix bundle. Domain III (436–697) is mainly a seven-stranded β barrel, with an additional β-hairpin extended to domains I and II. There are two disulfide bonds (C592-C636 and C594-C643) within domain III of each subunit, which are highly conserved among hemocyanins and PPOs. C592-C636 is situated on the surface and exposed to the solvent, while C594-C643 is located at the interface of domains II and III, which may contribute to the structural stability. The overall structure of AgPPO8 homodimer closely resembles that of MsPPO heterodimer (Fig. 1c), with a 1.14 Å root-mean-square deviation over 1,129 aligned Cα atoms.
Fig. 1

Crystal structure of A. gambiae PPO8. (a) Overall structure of the homodimer with each subunit shown in cyan and green, respectively. Cu atoms are shown as brown spheres. (b) The domain structure of AgPPO8: pro-region, magenta; domain I, blue; domain II, yellow; domain III, green. The Cu atoms are shown as brown spheres and the disulfide bonds are shown as red sticks. The side chain of Arg51 preceding the proteolytic cleavage site is shown as a black stick. (c) Superposition of AgPPO8 (cyan) with M. sexta PPO heterodimer (PPO-1 in magenta and 2 in yellow, PDB ID 3HHS). AgPPO8 is 41.1 % identical in a.a. sequence to MsPPO1 and 38.8 % to MsPPO2. (d) The di-copper active site of A. gambiae PPO8. The Cu atoms are shown as brown spheres. Six conserved His residues (magenta) coordinate CuA and CuB, and are stabilized by three Phe residues (F248, F415 and the 'placeholder' F99, shown as red sticks). V406 (orange) aligns to a putative catalytic residue E395 in MsPPO2. Glu364 (green) forms a salt bridge (black dash) with R244 (yellow), and is required for the enzymatic activities of AgPPO8. The secondary structures of AgPPO8 are shown and colored in cyan

Dimerization of AgPPO8

AgPPO8 was found to stay mainly as a homodimer in solution by size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering (Additional file 1). Two types of dimerization patterns exist in the crystal structure, a tight homodimer and a loose one. The tight dimer associates (chain A and chain B) via a two-fold non-crystallographic symmetry axis in the asymmetric unit. The loose dimer involves chain A molecule and a crystallographic symmetry-related chain B molecule in the crystal lattice. The tight dimer interface is mainly stabilized through extensive hydrophobic and charge-charge interactions predominantly from domains I and II, burying a large (4,624 Å solvent accessible surface area which is comparable to that of MsPPO heterodimer [26]. In contrast, the loose dimer buries a much smaller surface area ( 934 Å2) at the interface. The tight homo-dimeric association of AgPPO8 was also confirmed with an analysis performed with the PISA server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/prot_int/pistart.html), suggesting it is the biologically functional dimer.

Active site of AgPPO8

During refinement, we observed a large positive difference electron density at the supposed bi-metal center (Additional file 2), although no additional metal ions were supplied during the protein expression. We believe the bound metal ions came from the trace amount of metal in LB medium. The identities of the metal consequently could not be unambiguously determined in this study, since either Zn or Cu atoms could be positioned at the same locations and refine well. This observation is consistent with a previous report that heterogeneous incorporation of zinc and copper ions was found at the active site of Bacillus megaterium tyrosinase [33]. In this study, we interpreted the metals as Cu ions and finalized that in the deposited structure. Each metal ion is coordinated with the NE2 atoms of three histidine residues, which are highly conserved in this protein family (Fig. 1d): CuA is associated with H223, H227 and H252, while CuB is associated with H379, H383 and H419. All six histidine residues are located in the α-helix bundle from domain II, and stabilized by three Phe residues (F99, F248 and F415) through hydrophobic interactions: F99 with H379 and H383, F248 with H227, H252 and H379, and F415 with H223, H252, H383 and H419 (Additional file 3). The distance between the two copper atoms is 4.5 Å, which is the typical distance for the reduced form of type III di-copper proteins. The UV/Vis absorption spectrum did not exhibit any apparent characteristic feature from 250 to 700 nm (Additional file 4), supporting that the AgPPO8 structure we obtained was in the deoxy state.

The di-copper center observed in AgPPO8 is similar to those in other type III copper enzymes. However, the catalytic residue has been elusive due to the amino acid variations near the dicopper center (Fig. 2). In MsPPO2, one unique acidic residue (E395) was proposed to be a catalytic residue responsible for the hydroxylase activity of the enzyme since its carboxylic oxygen in the side chain may deprotonate the hydroxyl group of the monophenol substrate (Fig. 2c) [26, 34]. Remarkably, although AgPPO8 was able to convert monophenol to diphenol (see below), it contains a valine residue (V406) at the equivalent position, which lacks an acidic side chain (Fig. 1d, 2a). Therefore, the deprotonation of the phenolic substrate during AgPPO8 enzymatic catalysis may involve a different residue.
Fig. 2

Comparison of the di-copper centers from different type III copper proteins. (a) A. gambiae PPO8 (AgPPO8), PDB ID 4YZW; (b) M. sexta PPO1 (MsPPO1), 3HHS-B; (c) M. sexta PPO2 (MsPPO2), 3HHS-A; (d) Marsupenaeus japonicus (Mj) PPOβ, 3WKY; (e) Limulus polyphemus hemocyanin deoxy state (LpHc), 1LLA; (f) Octopus hemocyanin functional unit Odg, 1JS8; (g) Ipomoea batatas catechol oxidase (IbCO) in complex with 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU), 1BUG; (h) Vitis vinifera catechol oxidase (VvCO), 2P3X; (i) Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus tyrosinase (ScTyr), 2ZMX; (j) Agaricus bisporus tyrosinase (AbTyr), 2Y9W; (k) Aspergillus oryzae pro-tyrosinase (AoProTyr), 3W6W; (l) Superposition of BmTyr structures in complex with bound tyrosine (4P6R) and L-DOPA (4P6S) (BmTyr:T/D); (m) Superposition of the active sites from AgPPO8, ScTyr, AoProTyr, LpHc and BmTyr:D. Space overlapping between the placeholders and phenolic substrate is indicated by a red dashed cycle. The Cu or Zn atoms are shown as large brown or gray spheres, the Cu-coordinated or hydrogen-bonded water molecules are shown as small red spheres. The hydrogen bonds are indicated as black dashes

Substrate binding by AgPPO8

As seen in other arthropod PPOs and hemocyanins, AgPPO8 also contains a putative ‘placeholder’ for phenolic substrates, which is F99 in each subunit (Fig. 1d, Additional file 3). This conserved residue resides in a loop of domain I with its aromatic side chain protruding to the di-copper center and stacking onto the imidazole ring of H383 at the CuB site. It was assumed in the prior studies that the placeholder aromatic residue would be withdrawn from the di-copper center during PPO activation through major conformational changes (see discussion), allowing its position be replaced by a natural phenolic substrate during enzymatic catalysis. Interestingly, the analysis of the AgPPO8 structure revealed a prominent cavity in the di-copper reaction center, which is close (~1.5 Å) to the solvent-accessible surface (Fig. 3a). This cavity is surrounded by the six Cu-coordinating His residues, F99, F415, E364, N380, V406, along with other residues from domain I and II (Fig. 3a). The volume of the cavity (451 Å3, calculated by program CASTp [35]) appears large enough to accommodate monophenolic or diphenolic substrates such as tyramine and dopamine (approximately 190–200 Å3). Therefore, we named this pocket as the second substrate-binding site (Site II) with respect to the placeholder position (Site I). To test if this pocket could hold substrates, we carried out docking experiments using the Autodock program. After selecting certain amino acids at the active site as the flexible residues to accommodate potential protein dynamics (see Methods), we individually docked tyramine and dopamine into AgPPO8 (Additional file 5). Although a larger grid box covering the entire di-copper center and the empty cavity was set as the search space, both substrates were successfully docked into the putative substrate-binding Site II in similar orientations (Fig. 3b) without significant reconfiguration of the active site (Fig. 3c,d). This observation suggested substrate binding to PPO could be achieved without displacing the placeholder. Interestingly, in the docked protein structures, we found residue E364 located very close to the docked substrates (Fig. 3c,d). Albeit distant from the di-copper center (6.7 and 7.6 Å from CuA and CuB in apo-AgPPO8), the OE2 atom of E364 is 3.0 and 3.1 Å to the phenolic oxygens of tyramine and dopamine, respectively. This observation suggested that E364 could play an important role in the deprotonation of the phenolic substrates, which was shown to be essential for binding of the phenolic oxygen to one of the copper atoms [34, 36, 37]. E364 also forms a salt bridge with R244 in a stable conformation, which may assist in correctly positioning the carboxylic side chain during the deprotonation process (Figs. 1d and 3c,d). We found this Glu residue highly conserved among other type III di-copper proteins (Fig. 2). These observations indicated that this Glu residue could be a common catalytic residue for PO enzymatic activities, and may serve in an alternative mechanism for PPO activation (see below).
Fig. 3

A new and unique substrate-binding pocket (Site II) of AgPPO8. (a) AgPPO8 contains a cavity approximate to surface (Site II, side view). The cavity and solvent exposed surface areas are represented in cyan and gray, respectively. The key residues surrounding the cavity are shown as violet sticks. (b) The side view of Site II pocket with tyramine (green) and dopamine (yellow) docked inside. The distances (Å) from the phenolic oxygens of the substrates to CuA and CuB are indicated. (c and d) Superposition of the active sites before and after docking. The active site residues of the apo-AgPPO8 are shown as magenta sticks, while the complex structures with docked substrates bound are colored in cyan (tyramine) and green (dopamine), respectively. The hydrogen bonding between the substrate and E364 is highlighted with black dash. The distances (Å) from E364 to CuA, CuB, the putative placeholder F99, and the phenolic oxygens of docked substrates (yellow sticks) are indicated. The distance of the salt bridge between residues E364 and R244 is also labeled (before docking, magenta; after docking, tyramine, cyan and dopamine, green). CuA and CuB are shown as brown spheres

E364 is key to hydroxylation and oxidation

To test our hypothesis that E364 is essential for the enzymatic activities of AgPPO8 by deprotonating phenolic substrates, we mutated it to a neutral Gln residue. The recombinant E364Q mutant was expressed as a soluble protein in E. coli cells and folded properly with an approaching melting point as the wild type as shown from the Differential Scanning Fluorimetry analysis (Additional file 6). The enzymatic activities of both wild type and mutant AgPPO8 were assayed in vitro. When using dopamine as the substrate, the E364Q mutant lost nearly 89 % of its oxidase activity compared to the wild type (Fig. 4a), indicating E364 is the base responsible for the deprotonation of diphenolic substrate. When using tyramine as the substrate, E364Q mutant impaired 93 % of its hydroxylase activity compared to the wild type (Fig. 4b), by detecting the dopamine formation at 280 nm. This demonstrated that E364 is also necessary for deprotonating the monophenolic substrate. Taken together, we conclude that E364 is essential for both the hydroxylase and oxidase activities of AgPPO8 with its carboxylate group acting as a general base for monophenol and diphenol deprotonation.
Fig. 4

E364 is key to PO enzymatic catalysis. (a) E364Q mutation severely impairs diphenol oxidase activity of AgPPO8. Dopamine was used as the substrate and specific PO activity was shown as ΔmOD470/min/μg or U/μg; P <0.001. (b) E364Q mutation severely impairs the monophenol hydroxylase activity of AgPPO8. Tyramine was used as the substrate and the rate of dopamine formation catalyzed by 1 μg enzyme was estimated as ΔmOD280/min/μg or U/μg; P <0.001. All data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3)

Discussion

In this study, we determined the crystal structure of AgPPO8, which is the first structure of recombinant PPO and the first from a mosquito species. The structural and functional studies on AgPPO8 revealed a novel substrate-binding pocket and identified E364 as a catalytic residue key to the PO activities. Our data also provide new insights into the catalytic mechanism of PO and suggest a new model for PPO activation at the molecular level.

Catalytic residues for phenol deprotonation

Enzymatic activities of type III copper protein require deprotonation of the phenolic substrates, which is essential for coordinating the phenolic oxygen to one of the copper atoms and subsequent catalytic reactions [34, 36, 37]. So far, at least five different residues have been proposed as the potential deprotonating base. In Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus tyrosinase (ScTyr), a flexible, CuA-coordinating H54 was supposed to serve as the base [38]. This is not applicable to PPOs due to inflexibility of their His residues in the active site [26]. In mouse tyrosinase, a free His preceding the sixth coordinating His is vital for the oxidation of diphenols [39], yet this residue is absent in arthropod hemocyanins and PPOs. In MsPPO2, there are two acidic Glu residues in the vicinity of its binuclear center, E353 (equivalent to E364 of AgPPO8) and E395 [26]. Since E395 is located much closer to CuA, the presumed site for hydroxylase activity [40, 41], and within 3 Å distance from residue F88, the ‘placeholder’ for phenolic substrates, it was postulated to be responsible for tyrosine deprotonation in the monooxygenase reaction. However, this Glu residue is not present in most type III di-copper proteins that exhibit the hydroxylase activity (Fig. 2). Due to technical difficulties in expressing recombinant MsPPOs, the putative catalytic function of E395 in MsPPO2 has not been verified experimentally through mutagenesis analysis. Recent studies on B. megaterium tyrosinase provided complex structures in met form with bound tyrosine or L-DOPA (BmTyr:T/D), revealing that the CuA site is solely responsible for its monooxygenase and diphenoloxidase activities [42]. A conserved water molecule activated by E195 was proposed to be the intermediate base for deprotonating the entering substrates, since it is closer to the di-copper center than the candidate residue E195 (Fig. 2l). Nevertheless, the water molecule was not observed to have direct contact with the bound substrates in the met form structures. In AgPPO8, E364 is the equivalent residue to BmTyr E195. The proposed catalytic water molecule also exists in the current structure, which is situated at a 6 Å distance from CuA and stabilized by E364 and N380 (Fig. 2a). It may be possible that AgPPO8 also adopts a similar water-mediated deprotonation mechanism in its catalytic reaction. However, the role of this water molecule has not been confirmed since it is not found in the crystal structure of Vitis vinifera catechol oxidase (VvCO) (Fig. 2h), which contains the conserved E235 and N240 [43]. In the structure of Ipomoea batatas catechol oxidase (IbCO) (Fig. 2g), E236 was suggested to be responsible for the deprotonation of diphenolic substrates [44]. This Glu also aligns to E364 of AgPPO8, which is in fact highly conserved among type III di-copper proteins (Fig. 2). Our functional study confirmed the importance of E364 in both hydroxylase and oxidase activities of AgPPO8, representing the crucial mutagenesis data for PPO for the first time in the field. Collectively, these lines of evidence suggest that the Glu residue at this position is essential to type III copper enzyme activities by playing a critical role in the deprotonation of phenolic substrates. E364 of AgPPO8 is 7 Å away from the putative ‘placeholder’ F99 (Fig. 3d), making it unlikely to deprotonate the phenolic substrate at Site I. In contrast, E364 is in proximity to the docked substrates in the newly identified substrate-binding pocket Site II, implying that Site II might be the actual substrate-binding site for PO activities, at least for the initial substrate binding, which is independent of the canonical ‘placeholder’ position.

The activation mechanism of PPOs: a loop gated entrance for substrate

PPO is synthesized in hemocytes and released to plasma, while partially transported to cuticles [45]. The activation of MsPPO requires the presence of PAP and SPHs simultaneously [46]. Without the SPHs, PAP can cleave PPO at the correct position but the product does not display PO activities. It was hypothesized that PPO activation is carried out by a PAP on the surface of a large complex of the SPHs [47]. In vitro, it was shown that PPO could be alternatively activated by treatment of detergents without proteolytic cleavage [4]. However, the mechanism of PPO activation remains elusive at the molecular level.

The di-copper active centers of all known type-3 copper protein structures could be well superimposed (Fig. 2). It was supposed that, in these structures, the entrances to the di-copper center are blocked by hydrophobic residues that need to be dislodged for activation. The blocker is a highly conserved Phe residue in all known arthropod hemocyanins, and a less conserved aliphatic amino acid in mollusc hemocyanins [11, 19]. In ScTyr, a caddie protein ORF378 acts as a shielding domain with its Y98 inserted into the substrate-binding pocket of tyrosinase [38]. This Tyr residue is kept away from the active site by the caddie protein at a sufficient distance to avoid reaction. The structure of Aspergillus oryzae pro-tyrosinase (AoProTyr) also confirms that F513 of C-terminal domain extends into the binuclear active site, protecting the enzyme from early reaction [48]. In the structure of IbCO, an inhibitor (1-phenyl-2-thiourea) is located at the equivalent position [44]. Because the aromatic rings of these blocking residues could be well superimposed to each other, they were suggested as the placeholders for incoming substrates and are stabilized by stacking interactions with a His residue at the CuB site [40]. By overlaying the active sites of these known type III protein structures onto the BmTyr:T/D complex [42], space clashes between the placeholders and phenolic substrates can be easily detected (Fig. 2m). These data implied that the placeholder must be removed to accommodate the substrate binding. In arthropod PPOs, a conserved Phe residue from the N-terminal domain I was considered as the substrate placeholder [26, 27]. Therefore, dislocation of the placeholder to make place for substrate access was assumed as a necessary step for PPO activation.

Hemocyanins are generally functional as oxygen carriers, although they were shown to be able to get activated in vitro by certain detergents and chemicals in the same way as PPOs [6, 19]. The conformational changes of the placeholder Phe residue in certain hemocyanins were observed. For example, the structural comparison of L. polyphemus hemocyanin subunit II of oxygenated state with deoxygenated Panulirus interruptus hemocyanin revealed an 8° rotation of domain I upon oxygen binding, pulling the placeholder F49 away from the active site [49, 50]. SDS activation of P. imperator hemocyanin oligomer also twisted domain I away from domains II and III, consequently removing F49 about 3.5 Å away from its original position [51].

The structure of AgPPO8 revealed an alternative substrate-binding Site II. In our docking analysis of AgPPO8, substrates could be accommodated in the putative binding pocket Site II without displacing the placeholder F99. This observation led to a reevaluation of the activation mechanism of type III di-copper proteins. There is a profound structural difference between the proteolytic activation of PPOs and other precursors of type III di-copper proteins. In pro-tyrosinases and hemocyanins, the proteolysis removes the shielding domain including the placeholder, exposing the catalytic di-copper center for substrate binding [48, 52]. A similar activation mechanism was also suggested for pro-catechol oxidases [53], while in PPOs multiple cleavage sites have been identified among different species [13, 46, 5459]. In most cases, the proteolytic cleavage of the N-terminal fragment does not remove the placeholder, which remains in the core of the enzyme downstream to the proteolytic cleavage site [46, 5759], and a subsequent conformational change is required to induce the enzyme activity since the active site is still buried. Indeed, the conserved placeholder Phe residue of PPOs is involved in extensive non-polar interactions with the Cu-coordinating His residues, stabilizing the active center. Dislodging the placeholder in PPO would require major conformational changes involving disruption of multiple domain–domain interactions. Should this happen in vivo, it could possibly be assisted by other protein complexes, which stabilize the labile intermediate conformation. However, a smaller conformational change could be sufficient for substrate to enter the active center via Site II (Fig. 5). The putative substrate-binding pocket in AgPPO8 is close to the solvent with the entrance gated by a flexible loop YPASGP (230–235) from domain II and the α-helix P101-D116 from domain I at the molecular surface (Fig. 5a). The loop contacts the α-helix merely via loose van der Waals interactions, suggesting that reorientation of the loop by modulating PPO surface plasticity is possible. The N-terminal Tyr-Pro and C-terminal Gly-Pro of the loop, which are highly conserved among different PPOs (Fig. 5a, Inset), have a higher frequency of occurrences in cis-trans conformational switching [60, 61], and may therefore serve as the hinge facilitating the loop to flip over and open up the gate towards Site II, allowing its access by the substrates (Fig. 5b). This model apparently does not need the withdrawal of the placeholder F99, which is buried in the core of the protein. Notably, when we manually removed the placeholder F99 from the structure of AgPPO8 in the docking experiment, the phenolic substrate still docked to Site II (Additional file 7), further supporting its preferential binding of substrate. Taking into account that the phenolic oxygen of the docked substrates is 6.5–7.3 Å away from the di-nuclear coppers (Fig. 3b), the orientation of docked substrates could represent the initial substrate binding. Further shifting of the substrate towards the di-copper center is required in order for the catalysis to occur. In fact, there is extra vacant space within the Site II pocket immediately above the di-copper center (Fig. 3b). Therefore, subsequent fine-tuning of the active site geometry could be sufficient for coordinating the bound substrate to the di-copper atoms within Site II pocket.
Fig. 5

A loop gating model for AgPPO8 activation. (a) The top view of Site II pocket with docked tyramine (green) and dopamine (yellow). The secondary structures of AgPPO8 are shown in gray. The flexible loop Y230-P235 (red) forms loose van der Waals contacts with the α-helix P101-D116 (red), controlling the entrance to the substrate binding Site II (cyan). The putative placeholder F99 and the catalytic residue E364 are shown as violet sticks. Inset shows the sequence alignment of the loop among different PPOs from insects and crustaceans. Ms, Manduca sexta; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Ag, Anopheles gambiae; Aa, Aedes aegypti; Tm, Tenebrio molitor; Bm, Bombyx mori; Mr, Macrobrachium rosenbergii; Pt, Portunus trituberculatus; Mj, Marsupenaeus japonicas. The distances from E364 to the putative placeholder F99 (magenta) and the docked tyramine (green)/dopamine (yellow) are indicated. (b) A cartoon illustration of the loop gated AgPPO8 activation. The side view of the Site II pocket is shown with the loop-helix controlled entrance located at the top. Left, closed state. Right, open state. Conformational changes at the molecular surface disrupt the loose contact between the loop Y230-P235 and the helix P101-D116, opening the gate and allowing the substrates to access the active site

Our data here suggested an alternative model for PPO activation without displacing the canonical ‘placeholder’ Phe residue. This model implies that Site II could be the actual substrate-binding site for PO activities. The PPO activation process involves a movement of a flexible loop at the entrance to the substrate binding Site II. This conformation change could be induced by the interaction of PPO with other molecules. In vitro, the binding of ionic detergents to the charged surface of PPO could induce allosteric conformational changes at the loop Y230-P235. In vivo, the mechanism of PPO activation is not yet well understood, but our data presented here suggest that a similar activation mechanism could also be adopted. The opening of the gate at Site II could be modulated by exquisite protein–protein interactions between PPO and the activating protein complexes, which have been extensively investigated in the prior studies [47, 6265]. It is possible that the proteolytic cleavage of PPO in the pro-region could simply create surface complementarities between these proteins for optimal binding and recruitment [26]. The ‘placeholder’ Phe residue therefore may not be dislodged from its original stable position during this PPO activation process.

Conclusions

In this work, we determined the crystal structure of a recombinant PPO8 from a mosquito species, Anopheles gambiae, which forms a homodimer with each subunit containing a conserved type III di-copper active site. We identified E364 as the catalytic residue key to the PO activities through mutagenesis and functional analysis, which elucidated a conserved catalytic mechanism applicable to other type III di-copper enzymes. Our results also revealed the actual substrate-binding site and offered a novel model for PPO activation without withdrawing the previously proposed ‘placeholder’ phenylalanine residue. The data we presented here provides new insights into the mechanisms of PPO activation and enzymatic catalysis, and should provide an important focus for future investigations.

Methods

Plasmid construction, protein expression, purification and crystallization

The DNA of the 5’ and 3’ AgPPO8 cDNA fragments were amplified from a cDNA pool of second instar A. gambiae larvae. The PCR products were separately ligated with pGEM-T DNA (Promega) for transforming JM109 (Promega). After sequence verification, the 5’ and 3’ fragments were retrieved and ligated with a modified pET vector as a SUMO fusion with an N-terminal 6xHis-tag. There are two additional FLAG and c-Myc tags next to the N-terminal and C-terminal of AgPPO8 sequence, respectively, which are used for functional studies other than this work. Protein expression was carried out in E. coli BL21 gold (DE3) cells (Stratagene). The colony carrying the recombinant plasmid was grown in LB medium and protein expression was induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside at 16 °C for 16 h. The point mutation of AgPPO8 was constructed following the protocol of QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). The AgPPO8 mutant was expressed in the same way as the wild type protein. The individual proteins were purified using a similar double Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid procedure as previously described [66]. The purified AgPPO8 was concentrated to 7.2 mg/mL. For optimal reproducibility of crystallization, all purified proteins were flash frozen and stored at −80 °C until usage [67]. AgPPO8 crystallized in sitting drops at room temperature with a reservoir solution containing 0.2 M lithium citrate tribasic tetrahydrate, 20 % PEG 3,350, at pH 8.4. Crystals were cryoprotected by soaking in mother crystallization solution containing 20 % glycerol.

Data collection and structural determination

A set of data was collected at 100 K to 2.60 Å resolution at the Advanced Photon Source, beam-line 19-ID, Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, IL) and processed by the HKL3000 program [68]. The initial phasing was obtained by molecular replacement with the Phaser program of CCP4 suit, in which chain B of the crystal structure of MsPPOs (PDB code 3HHS) was used as the searching model. Subsequent model building was carried out by Autobuild program of Phenix [69] coupled with manual modeling using WinCoot [70]. The structure was further refined using Phenix.refine and the final model was analyzed by the Molprobity server [71]. The current model is of excellent geometry and refinement statistics (Table 1), and validated by wwpdb validation servers [72]. The structure factors and atomic coordinates for AgPPO8 have been deposited in the protein data bank with accession code 4YZW. All structural figures were generated using PyMol [73].
Table 1

Data collection and refinement statistics

Crystal data

 

 Beam-line

19-ID APS

 Wavelength, Å

0.97915

 Space group

P 21

 Cell constants

a = 75.6 Å, b = 106.6 Å, c = 92.1 Å, β = 105.8°

 Resolution, Å

2.60

 Total reflections

214,320

 Unique reflections

43,019

 Completeness, %

99.0 (97.3)

 I/σ

8.9 (1.8)

 Rsym, %

12.9 (47.2)

Refinement statistics

 

 Reflection range used, Å

2.60–44.32

 No. reflections used

42,950

 Rwork/Rfree, %

18.8/23.3

 rmsd bonds, Å

0.0046

 rmsd angle, °

0.791

 Ramachandran plot (preferred/allowed), %

96.6/3.4

No. of atoms

 

 Protein

10,901

 Metal ions

4

 Waters

263

R sym  = ∑|I obs - I avg|/ ∑ I avg; Rwork = ∑ ││F obsF calc││/ ∑ F obs

R free was calculated using 5 % data

APS, Advanced Photon Source; I/σ, Intensity/Sigma (Intensity). Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shell 2.69–2.60 Å

UV/vis absorption spectrophotometry

Beckman DU520 General Purpose UV/vis Spectrophotometer was used for recording the UV/vis absorption spectrum of AgPPO8. A quartz micro cell cuvette of 1 cm path length was used. AgPPO8 protein was diluted to 0.5 mg/mL, with a buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl and 500 mM NaCl, at pH 7.8. The absorption spectrum scan was recorded from 250–700 nm.

Dynamic light scattering of AgPPO8

The protein sample (7.2 mg/mL) in 20 mM Tris–HCl and 500 mM NaCl, at pH 7.8 was added into the ZMV1002 quartz batch cuvette and particle size was measured by using dynamic light scattering in the dual capability Zetasizer μV (Malvern, Inc.).

Docking analysis

The docking of tyrosine or dopamine into the AgPPO8 active site was performed using AutoDock (version 4.2.6) [74]. The structures of tyramine and dopamine were obtained from Protein Database Bank. Based on the analysis from the previously published structures, H223, 227, 252, 379, 383, 419, L98, F99, F248, F415, E364, N380, and V406 were selected as flexible residues, and all of the bonds between CuA and CuB, except for that of V406, were inactivated, to allow slight protein dynamics upon substrate binding. Lamarckian genetic algorithm with 2,500,000 evaluations per run was chosen as the searching method. Default settings were used for all other docking parameters. The copper parameters were set as r (van der Waal’s radii) = 3.50, ε (vdW well depth) = 0.005 kcal/mol, and a charge of +2.0e. The docked conformation with the lowest docked energy and correct orientation (with the phenol groups of the substrate pointing towards the dicopper site) was selected for binding analysis.

Enzyme activity assay

Enzymatic activities were measured by a microplate assay as previously described [57]. For determination of diphenol oxidase activity, 0.5 μg PPO, 50 μM CuCl2 and 0.002 % (w/v) CPC were mixed in the buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl at pH 7.5, bringing a final volume to 15 μL. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min, followed by addition of 150 μL of 2 mM dopamine dissolved in 50 mM MOPS buffer at pH 6.5. The absorbance at 470 nm was monitored on a plate reader (Molecular Device VersaMax). One unit of PO activity was defined as the amount of activated PPO causing the increase of 0.001 absorbance unit per min. For hydroxylase activity measurement, 5 μg AgPPO8 was incubated with 50 μM CuCl2 and 0.02 % (w/v) CPC in the same way and 150 μL of 2 mM tyramine was used as the substrate. Dopamine formation was detected as the increase of absorbance at 280 nm [75]. Note that the absorbance increase at 280 nm includes a small contribution from the further dopamine–dopamine quinone conversion catalyzed by CPC-activated PPO. For each reaction, three replicates were performed and specific activity (U/μg) was presented as mean ± SEM.

Differential scanning fluorimetry

AgPPO8 wild type and E364Q mutant proteins were purified in the buffer containing 100 mM HEPES and 150 mM NaCl, at pH 7.5; 40 μL of the protein at 0.3 mg/mL concentration were mixed with 0.8 μL of 100× SYPRO-Orange fluorescence dye (Invitrogen) to bring to a final 2× concentration. Thermal denaturation curves were monitored on Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-time PCR Detection System, with a thermal gradient of 0.5 °C increment per 30 seconds from 24–95 °C (excitation wavelength at 515–535 nm, emission wavelength at 560–580 nm). For each reaction, three replicates were performed, and the Tm value was calculated using the CFX manager software v3.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

Availability of supporting data

The atomic coordinates and structure factors of AgPPO8 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.rcsb.org (PDB accession code 4YZW).

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of beamline 19-ID at the Advanced Photon Source for their generous support. This work was supported by NIH grants AI113539 (JD), GM58634, AI112662 (to HJ), and by Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station at Oklahoma State University under Projects OKL02848 (JD) and OKL02450 (HJ). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University
(2)
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University

References

  1. Ashida M, Brey PT. Recent advances on the research of the insect prophenoloxidase cascade. In: Brey PT, Hultmark D, editors. Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Response in Insects. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997. p. 135–72.Google Scholar
  2. Cerenius L, Soderhall K. The prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrates. Immunol Rev. 2004;198:116–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiang H. The biochemical basis of antimicrobial responses in Manduca sexta. Insect Sci. 2008;15(1):53–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2008.00187.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall M, Scott T, Sugumaran M, Soderhall K, Law JH. Proenzyme of Manduca sexta phenol oxidase: purification, activation, substrate specificity of the active enzyme, and molecular cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(17):7764–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Asada N, Fukumitsu T, Fujimoto K, Masuda K. Activation of prophenoloxidase with 2-propanol and other organic compounds in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;23(4):515–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Coates CJ, Nairn J. Diverse immune functions of hemocyanins. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014;45(1):43–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2014.01.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sugumaran M. Comparative biochemistry of eumelanogenesis and the protective roles of phenoloxidase and melanin in insects. Pigment Cell Res. 2002;15(1):2–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerenius L, Lee BL, Soderhall K. The proPO-system: pros and cons for its role in invertebrate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(6):263–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2008.02.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao P, Li J, Wang Y, Jiang H. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of the reactive compounds generated in vitro by Manduca sexta phenoloxidase. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37(9):952–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.05.001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Solomon EI, Sundaram UM, Machonkin TE. Multicopper oxidases and oxygenases. Chem Rev. 1996;96(7):2563–606.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Decker H, Schweikardt T, Nillius D, Salzbrunn U, Jaenicke E, Tuczek F. Similar enzyme activation and catalysis in hemocyanins and tyrosinases. Gene. 2007;398(1–2):183–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.051.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaintz C, Mauracher SG, Rompel A. Type-3 copper proteins: recent advances on polyphenol oxidases. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2014;97:1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.07.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu A, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Yang B, Wu K, Xie W, et al. Insect prophenoloxidase: the view beyond immunity. Front Physiol. 2014;5:252. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00252.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Boeckx T, Winters AL, Webb KJ, Kingston-Smith AH. Polyphenol oxidase in leaves: is there any significance to the chloroplastic localization? J Exp Botany. 2015;66(12):3571–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer AM. Polyphenol oxidases in plants and fungi: going places? A review. Phytochemistry. 2006;67(21):2318–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Oetting WS, King RA. Molecular basis of albinism: mutations and polymorphisms of pigmentation genes associated with albinism. Hum Mutat. 1999;13(2):99–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)13%3A2%3C99%3A%3AAID-HUMU2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-C.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Simonova M, Wall A, Weissleder R, Bogdanov Jr A. Tyrosinase mutants are capable of prodrug activation in transfected nonmelanotic cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60(23):6656–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mangum CP. Oxygen transport in invertebrates. Am J Physiol. 1985;248(5 Pt 2):R505–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Decker H, Jaenicke E. Recent findings on phenoloxidase activity and antimicrobial activity of hemocyanins. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004;28(7–8):673–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2003.11.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanchez-Ferrer A, Rodriguez-Lopez JN, Garcia-Canovas F, Garcia-Carmona F. Tyrosinase: a comprehensive review of its mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1247(1):1–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerdemann C, Eicken C, Krebs B. The crystal structure of catechol oxidase: new insight into the function of type-3 copper proteins. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35(3):183–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Burmester T. Molecular evolution of the arthropod hemocyanin superfamily. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18(2):184–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. van Holde KE, Miller KI, Decker H. Hemocyanins and invertebrate evolution. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(19):15563–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R100010200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Jiravanichpaisal P, Cerenius L, Lee BL, Soderhall I, Soderhall K. Phenoloxidase is an important component of the defense against Aeromonas hydrophila infection in a crustacean, Pacifastacus leniusculus. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(46):33593–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M706113200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Binggeli O, Neyen C, Poidevin M, Lemaitre B. Prophenoloxidase activation is required for survival to microbial infections in Drosophila. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(5):e1004067. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004067.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y, Wang Y, Jiang H, Deng J. Crystal structure of Manduca sexta prophenoloxidase provides insights into the mechanism of type 3 copper enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(40):17002–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906095106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Masuda T, Momoji K, Hirata T, Mikami B. The crystal structure of a crustacean prophenoloxidase provides a clue to understanding the functionality of the type 3 copper proteins. FEBS J. 2014;281(11):2659–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12812.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yassine H, Osta MA. Anopheles gambiae innate immunity. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12(1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01388.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiang H, Wang Y, Korochkina SE, Benes H, Kanost MR. Molecular cloning of cDNAs for two pro-phenol oxidase subunits from the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27(7):693–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee WJ, Ahmed A, Della Torre A, Kobayashi A, Ashida M, Brey PT. Molecular cloning and chromosomal localization of a prophenoloxidase cDNA from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7(1):41–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller HM, Dimopoulos G, Blass C, Kafatos FC. A hemocyte-like cell line established from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae expresses six prophenoloxidase genes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(17):11727–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller HM. The prophenoloxidases of Anopheles gambiae. EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Sendovski M, Kanteev M, Ben-Yosef VS, Adir N, Fishman A. First structures of an active bacterial tyrosinase reveal copper plasticity. J Mol Biol. 2011;405(1):227–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.048.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rolff M, Schottenheim J, Decker H, Tuczek F. Copper-O2 reactivity of tyrosinase models towards external monophenolic substrates: molecular mechanism and comparison with the enzyme. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(7):4077–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00202j.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W116–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl282.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Itoh S, Fukuzumi S. Monooxygenase activity of type 3 copper proteins. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40(7):592–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ar6000395.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Itoh S, Kumei H, Taki M, Nagatomo S, Kitagawa T, Fukuzumi S. Oxygenation of phenols to catechols by a (mu-eta 2:eta 2-peroxo)dicopper(II) complex: mechanistic insight into the phenolase activity of tyrosinase. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123(27):6708–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Matoba Y, Kumagai T, Yamamoto A, Yoshitsu H, Sugiyama M. Crystallographic evidence that the dinuclear copper center of tyrosinase is flexible during catalysis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(13):8981–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509785200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Olivares C, Garcia-Borron JC, Solano F. Identification of active site residues involved in metal cofactor binding and stereospecific substrate recognition in mammalian tyrosinase. Implications to the catalytic cycle. Biochemistry. 2002;41(2):679–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Decker H, Schweikardt T, Tuczek F. The first crystal structure of tyrosinase: all questions answered? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45(28):4546–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200601255.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Olivares C, Solano F. New insights into the active site structure and catalytic mechanism of tyrosinase and its related proteins. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2009;22(6):750–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00636.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldfeder M, Kanteev M, Isaschar-Ovdat S, Adir N, Fishman A. Determination of tyrosinase substrate-binding modes reveals mechanistic differences between type-3 copper proteins. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5505.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Virador VM, Reyes Grajeda JP, Blanco-Labra A, Mendiola-Olaya E, Smith GM, Moreno A, et al. Cloning, sequencing, purification, and crystal structure of Grenache (Vitis vinifera) polyphenol oxidase. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(2):1189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902939q.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Klabunde T, Eicken C, Sacchettini JC, Krebs B. Crystal structure of a plant catechol oxidase containing a dicopper center. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5(12):1084–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/4193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Asano T, Ashida M. Cuticular pro-phenoloxidase of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Purification and demonstration of its transport from hemolymph. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(14):11100–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008426200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Gupta S, Wang Y, Jiang H. Manduca sexta prophenoloxidase (proPO) activation requires proPO-activating proteinase (PAP) and serine proteinase homologs (SPHs) simultaneously. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35(3):241–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.12.003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang Y, Jiang H. Prophenoloxidase (proPO) activation in Manduca sexta: an analysis of molecular interactions among proPO, proPO-activating proteinase-3, and a cofactor. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34(8):731–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Fujieda N, Yabuta S, Ikeda T, Oyama T, Muraki N, Kurisu G, et al. Crystal structures of copper-depleted and copper-bound fungal pro-tyrosinase: insights into endogenous cysteine-dependent copper incorporation. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(30):22128–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.477612.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Volbeda A, Hol WG. Crystal structure of hexameric haemocyanin from Panulirus interruptus refined at 3.2 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1989;209(2):249–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Magnus KA, Hazes B, Ton-That H, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J, Hol WG. Crystallographic analysis of oxygenated and deoxygenated states of arthropod hemocyanin shows unusual differences. Proteins. 1994;19(4):302–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340190405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Cong Y, Zhang Q, Woolford D, Schweikardt T, Khant H, Dougherty M, et al. Structural mechanism of SDS-induced enzyme activity of scorpion hemocyanin revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. Structure. 2009;17(5):749–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.03.005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Decker H, Rimke T. Tarantula hemocyanin shows phenoloxidase activity. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(40):25889–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.40.25889.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Gerdemann C, Eicken C, Galla HJ, Krebs B. Comparative modeling of the latent form of a plant catechol oxidase using a molluskan hemocyanin structure. J Inorg Biochem. 2002;89(1–2):155–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Aspan A, Huang TS, Cerenius L, Soderhall K. cDNA cloning of prophenoloxidase from the freshwater crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and its activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(4):939–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kawabata T, Yasuhara Y, Ochiai M, Matsuura S, Ashida M. Molecular cloning of insect pro-phenol oxidase: a copper-containing protein homologous to arthropod hemocyanin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(17):7774–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee SY, Kwon TH, Hyun JH, Choi JS, Kawabata SI, Iwanaga S, et al. In vitro activation of pro-phenol-oxidase by two kinds of pro-phenol-oxidase-activating factors isolated from hemolymph of coleopteran, Holotrichia diomphalia larvae. Eur J Biochem. 1998;254(1):50–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Jiang H, Wang Y, Yu XQ, Kanost MR. Prophenoloxidase-activating proteinase-2 from hemolymph of Manduca sexta. A bacteria-inducible serine proteinase containing two clip domains. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(6):3552–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205743200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Jiang H, Wang Y, Yu XQ, Zhu Y, Kanost MR. Prophenoloxidase-activating proteinase-3 (PAP-3) from Manduca sexta hemolymph: a clip-domain serine proteinase regulated by serpin-1 J and serine proteinase homologs. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33(10):1049–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Chosa N, Fukumitsu T, Fujimoto K, Ohnishi E. Activation of prophenoloxidase A1 by an activating enzyme in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27(1):61–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Pal D, Chakrabarti P. Cis peptide bonds in proteins: residues involved, their conformations, interactions and locations. J Mol Biol. 1999;294(1):271–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3217.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Lorenzen S, Peters B, Goede A, Preissner R, Frommel C. Conservation of cis prolyl bonds in proteins during evolution. Proteins. 2005;58(3):589–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20342.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu XQ, Jiang H, Wang Y, Kanost MR. Nonproteolytic serine proteinase homologs are involved in prophenoloxidase activation in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33(2):197–208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Piao S, Song YL, Kim JH, Park SY, Park JW, Lee BL, et al. Crystal structure of a clip-domain serine protease and functional roles of the clip domains. EMBO J. 2005;24(24):4404–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600891.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Kan H, Kim CH, Kwon HM, Park JW, Roh KB, Lee H, et al. Molecular control of phenoloxidase-induced melanin synthesis in an insect. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(37):25316–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804364200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Clark KD, Strand MR. Hemolymph melanization in the silkmoth Bombyx mori involves formation of a high molecular mass complex that metabolizes tyrosine. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(20):14476–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.459222.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Krumm B, Meng X, Wang Z, Xiang Y, Deng J. A unique bivalent binding and inhibition mechanism by the yatapoxvirus interleukin 18 binding protein. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(8):e1002876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002876.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Deng J, Davies DR, Wisedchaisri G, Wu M, Hol WG, Mehlin C. An improved protocol for rapid freezing of protein samples for long-term storage. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(Pt 1):203–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Minor W, Cymborowski M, Otwinowski Z, Chruszcz M. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution--from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006;62(Pt 8):859–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444906019949.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 2):213–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 4):486–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Chen VB, Arendall 3rd WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 1):12–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10(12):980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb1203-980.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. DeLano W. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Palo Alto, CA, USA: DeLano Scientific; 2002.Google Scholar
  74. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(16):2785–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Duckworth HW, Coleman JE. Physicochemical and kinetic properties of mushroom tyrosinase. J Biol Chem. 1970;245(7):1613–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hu et al. 2016