Skip to main content
Download PDF

The tanning hormone, bursicon, does not act directly on the epidermis to tan the Drosophila exoskeleton

BMC Biology volume 18, Article number: 17 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In insects, continuous growth requires the periodic replacement of the exoskeleton. Once the remains of the exoskeleton from the previous stage have been shed during ecdysis, the new one is rapidly sclerotized (hardened) and melanized (pigmented), a process collectively known as tanning. The rapid tanning that occurs after ecdysis is critical for insect survival, as it reduces desiccation, and gives the exoskeleton the rigidity needed to support the internal organs and to provide a solid anchor for the muscles. This rapid postecdysial tanning is triggered by the “tanning hormone”, bursicon. Since bursicon is released into the hemolymph, it has naturally been assumed that it would act on the epidermal cells to cause the tanning of the overlying exoskeleton.

Results

Here we investigated the site of bursicon action in Drosophila by examining the consequences on tanning of disabling the bursicon receptor (encoded by the rickets gene) in different tissues. To our surprise, we found that rapid tanning does not require rickets function in the epidermis but requires it instead in peptidergic neurons of the ventral nervous system (VNS). Although we were unable to identify the signal that is transmitted from the VNS to the epidermis, we show that neurons that express the Drosophila insulin-like peptide ILP7, but not the ILP7 peptide itself, are involved. In addition, we found that some of the bursicon targets involved in melanization are different from those that cause sclerotization.

Conclusions

Our findings show that bursicon does not act directly on the epidermis to cause the tanning of the overlying exoskeleton but instead requires an intermediary messenger produced by peptidergic neurons within the central nervous system. Thus, this work has uncovered an unexpected layer of control in a process that is critical for insect survival, which will significantly alter the direction of future research aimed at understanding how rapid postecdysial tanning occurs.

Background

The insect exoskeleton (or cuticle) provides support for the animal’s organs and is also involved in a number of critical functions ranging from providing resistance to pathogens and desiccation to social communication and has likely contributed to this group’s evolutionary success. At the end of each molt, insects shed the remains of the old cuticle during ecdysis, then rapidly expand, pigment (melanize), and harden (sclerotize) the new exoskeleton. The molecular pathways that cause cuticle melanization and sclerotization are broadly conserved among insects [1, 2]. Briefly, both processes share a common initial pathway that starts in the epidermis with the hydroxylation of l-tyrosine into DOPA by the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) enzyme, followed by decarboxylation into dopamine by dopa decarboxylase (DDC). Dopamine can then be oxidized into black melanin via phenoloxidases (melanization pathway) or be transformed into N-β-alanyldopamine (NBAD) via an NBAD synthase and enter the sclerotization pathway, which results in the production of quinones. In the cuticle, the quinones catalyze the formation of adducts between cuticular proteins (CPs) and chitin, thereby providing rigidity to the cuticle [3].

The rapid tanning (melanization + sclerotization) of the cuticle that occurs after ecdysis is under the control of the so-called “tanning hormone”, bursicon, which is highly conserved among insects [4,5,6]. Bursicon is a heterodimeric neurohormone, which acts on the G protein coupled receptor LGR2 [7, 8]. In Drosophila, DLGR2 is encoded by the rickets gene (rk). Flies mutant for rk or for bursicon subunits (encoded by the bursicon (burs) and partner of bursicon (pburs) genes, also known, respectively, as bursicon α and bursicon β) fail to tan properly; they also show an altered body shape and do not expand their wings [9, 10]. Bursicon is synthesized by neurons located in the subesophageal ganglion (SEG) and in abdominal ganglia, which also produce the neuropeptide, crustacean cardioactive peptide, CCAP [10]. Once the adult fly emerges from its puparium, bursicon is released into the hemolymph mostly by the neurons of the abdominal ganglia [11, 12]. How bursicon then causes the tanning of the cuticle is unclear. Nevertheless, it has been assumed that it would act directly on the epidermis to cause the secretion of melanin and reactive quinones into the overlying extracellular cuticular matrix [13,14,15]. Consistent with this hypothesis, rk is expressed in epidermal cells, and rk mutants show a delay in the phosphorylation of epithelial TH, which is necessary for the activation of the tanning pathway [13].

Here we use a variety of genetic approaches to show that the tanning of the Drosophila adult cuticle is not caused by direct actions of bursicon on the epidermis. Instead, we found that RK is required in a small set of peptidergic neurons in the ventral nervous system (VNS) in order for the rapid melanization and sclerotization of the cuticle to occur following adult emergence. Our findings challenge the current view of bursicon action and reveal previously unsuspected elements involved in the pathway that controls the rapid postecdysial maturation of the insect cuticle.

Results

Loss of RK function prevents cuticle sclerotization and delays the melanization of the adult fly but eventually results in a darker than normal exoskeleton

Flies trans-heterozygous for loss-of-function rk mutations (rk1/rk4) do not expand their wings, present an abnormal body shape and fail to melanize properly [9]. A comparable result was obtained when a rk RNAi or a membrane tethered bursicon hormone transgene (here called tBur), which acts as a dominant negative rk allele [16, 17], was expressed in all rk-expressing cells using a rk-GAL4 driver (Fig. 1a,b; results shown for female flies; similar results were obtained with adult male flies, Additional file 1: Figure S1). In all cases, the resulting adult flies did not expand their wings and their bodies did not rapidly pigment after adult emergence. Indeed, at 3 h posteclosion, median cuticle pigmentation was around 150 for control flies whereas it was around 100 for flies expressing tBur under the control of the rk-GAL4 driver (− 33%)(see “Methods” section for a description of the method used here to quantify cuticle pigmentation). Interestingly, at 48 h, the flies with impaired RK function showed a significantly darker pigmentation than their respective controls. Indeed, by 2 days posteclosion, the median score for these flies was around 250, whereas it was around 200 for controls (+ 25%). Importantly, these experiments revealed that driving the tBur transgene using the rk-GAL4 driver (abbreviated here rk>tBur) phenocopied the pigmentation defects expressed by rk1/rk4, and by rk1/rk1 and rk4/rk4 (not shown), mutant flies. For this reason, we chose to use the tBur transgene to interfere with RK function for most experiments reported here.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ubiquitous knockdown of rk differentially affects melanization at 3 h and 48 h post emergence. a Representative pictures of the fourth abdominal segment of female control (left) and rk>tBur (right) flies at 3 h (upper panel) and 48 h (lower panel) after emergence. b Quantification of abdominal pigmentation measured in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur or two different rk RNAi transgenes (RNAi A and RNAi B) under the control of the rk-GAL4 driver (rk>); in rk1/rk4 mutant flies; and in controls. Genotypes are indicated by the combination of squares within each column, and color-coded as follows: blue squares correspond to mutant animals (in this case rk1/rk4), orange squares represent transgenic combinations (e.g., rk>tBur, for the first column), and gray boxes correspond to control genotypes (e.g., GAL4 drivers alone). Boxes mark the first and third quartiles, thick lines mark the medians, and whiskers represent data range. Red dashed line indicates the median pigmentation level of rk mutants and will be used as a visual reference in all figures of this type. Results for each age were compared using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post hoc analysis. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD, p < 0.01). n = 10 for each group

Full size image

In addition to defects in the timecourse of melanization, we noticed that, at 48 h posteclosion, both the cuticle shape and its appearance were abnormal in rk1/rk4 flies and when tBur was expressed under the control of rk-GAL4 driver. Indeed, the abdominal cuticle of these flies showed abnormal folds (Additional file 1: Figure S2A) and also appeared matte compared to that of control flies, which always looked shiny by this time. Since these phenotypes could be caused by defects in sclerotization, we developed a semi-quantitative assay to measure the extent of cuticle hardening, based on the levels of soluble proteins that could be extracted from either the abdominal or the wing cuticle, and visualized in silver-stained protein gels (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S2B). This assay showed that the levels of soluble proteins that could be extracted from the cuticle of control flies was maximal at 0 h post eclosion, decreased slightly at 3 h and was almost undetectable at 48 h, indicating that by 2 days posteclosion the protein crosslinking reaction that underlies the sclerotization process had rendered insoluble most cuticular proteins. By contrast, the levels of soluble proteins that could be extracted from rk1/rk4 and rk>tBur flies showed a twofold increase at 3 h compared to those of their respective control and many proteins remained detectable even 48 h after emergence.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sclerotization is nearly complete by 3 h in wildtype flies whereas rk mutant flies and flies with ubiquitous knockdown of rk express defective sclerotization up to 48 h postemergence. a Visualization of soluble cuticular proteins extracted from wings at 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postemergence in control (heterozygous rk4/rk+ flies, left panel) and in transheterozygous rk mutant (rk4/rk1, right panel) flies. b Pictures of representative silver-stained gel of soluble cuticular proteins extracted from wings (left) or abdominal epidermis (right) of control (rk>+) and rk knockdown (rk>tBur) flies at 3 (upper panel) and 48 (lower panel) hours after emergence. Red rectangles indicate the bands that were quantified in c. c Intensity of bands marked in b for three separate experiments; short black horizontal lines indicate the median. Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD, p < 0.01). For quantification of other bands (indicated in Additional file 1: Figure S2B), see Additional file 1: Figure S5

Full size image

Bursicon does not act directly on the epidermis to induce cuticle tanning

To determine if bursicon acts directly on the epidermis to cause melanization, we created mosaic flies bearing marked patches of homozygous rk mutant (rk4/rk4) epidermal cells in an otherwise normal (rk4/rk+) animal. Surprisingly, the cuticle overlying the patches of homozygous rk mutant epidermis did not show any pigmentation defects at 3 h or 48 h post emergence (Fig. 3a,b); this result was observed regardless of patch size, consistent with the cell-autonomous property expected of the rk GPCR. To confirm this result using a separate approach, we expressed tBur in the epidermis using two different epidermal GAL4 driver lines: Tyrosine Hydroxylase-GAL4 (TH-GAL4) and Dopa-Decarobylase-GAL4 (DDC-GAL4), both used in combination with elav-GAL80 to prevent knockdown of RK expression in the nervous system. Consistent with the results obtained using mosaic animals, we found that knockdown of RK function in the epidermis produced flies with normal levels of pigmentation at 3 h and 48 h post emergence (Fig. 3c; results shown for female flies; similar results were obtained in males, Additional file 1: Figure S1). Similar results were obtained using rk RNAi transgenes driven by TH-GAL4 (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Taken together, these results show that RK function is not required in the epidermis to regulate postecdysial melanization.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bursicon does not act directly on the epidermis to regulate tanning. a Abdominal cuticle of 3-h-old mosaic fly bearing patch of rk4/rk4 mutant tissue in an otherwise rk4/rk+ animal. Mutant tissue is marked by the cell-autonomous stc mutation and is outlined in red. b Quantification of pigmentation of cuticle overlying rk4/rk4 epidermal clones (red circles) or rk+/rk+ control clones (blue circles) as a function of clone size. Neither clone size nor genotype effected significantly the pigmentation at 3 h or 48 h postemergence (ANCOVA analysis; n ≥ 35 clones from 15 flies per group). c Abdominal pigmentation of flies in which tBur expression was driven in the epidermis using the TH-GAL4 and DDC-GAL4 drivers in combination with elav-GAL80 (to restrict expression to the epidermis). n = 10 for each group. Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b. NS: not significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.56; n = 10 per group). d Quantification of soluble cuticular proteins extracted from wings and abdominal epidermis of flies expressing TH>tBur in combination with elav-GAL80, in rk>tBur flies, and in their respective controls. Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b. Intensity of reference bands (cf. Fig. 2b) is shown for three separate experiments; median is indicated by short horizontal line. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD, p < 0.001). For quantification using other bands (indicated in Additional file 1: Figure S2B), see Additional file 1: Figure S6. e Left: image of wing of engrailed>tBur (en>tBur) fly. Right: Quantification of soluble cuticular proteins extracted from the posterior and anterior half of the wing. Although the posterior half of the wing appears misfolded, the amounts of soluble protein extracted from each half did not differ significantly (measurements shown for three separate experiments; median is indicated by short horizontal line). NS: non-significant (paired t-test, p > 0.7)

Full size image

We noticed that the cuticle of flies in which RK function had been knocked down in the epidermis showed abnormal folds and a matte appearance, suggesting that in the epidermis RK may be involved in the process of sclerotization. To address this hypothesis, we estimated the quantity of soluble protein present in abdominal or wing cuticle of flies in which RK function was knocked down in the epidermis. Surprisingly, neither wings nor abdomens showed any increase in the levels of soluble proteins in these flies compared to those of their respective control (Fig. 3d). In parallel experiments, we used the engrailed-GAL4 (en-GAL4) driver to express tBur in the posterior half of the adult wing. Although the posterior part of the wings appeared misfolded and more matte than its anterior counterpart (Fig. 3e, left panel), we found no differences in the amounts of soluble protein that could be extracted from the anterior vs. the posterior half of the wing at either 3 h or 48 h post emergence (Fig. 3e, right panel). Taken together, these results show that RK function is not required in the epidermis to regulate postecdysial melanization or sclerotization. Nevertheless, the expression of rk in the epidermis and the morphological defects observed when RK function is disabled in the epidermis (e.g., Fig. 3e, left panel; Additional file 1: Figure S2A) suggest that rk may play an additional, if currently unknown, role in this tissue.

rickets function is required in the CNS to regulate postecdysial cuticle maturation

The rk gene is widely expressed in the CNS (see Additional file 1: Figures S9 and S10, below), and rk-expressing neurons have recently been shown to play a critical role during pupal ecdysis [18]. To investigate a potential role for rk in the CNS for cuticle darkening, we first examined the pigmentation of flies in which rk was knocked down in the CNS by driving tBur using the GAL4 drivers, elav-GAL4 and nsyb-GAL4 (which are known to drive gene expression in the CNS and not in the epidermis). As shown in Fig. 4a, these flies showed pigmentation defects at both 3 h and 48 h postemergence, which were similar to those expressed by rk1/rk4 mutant flies. Comparable results were obtained using these GAL4 lines to drive rk RNAi transgenes (Fig. 4a). In addition, the wings of these flies failed to expand (Fig. 5b), which is expected because wing expansion requires the nervous system to cause the abdomen to contract and pump hemolymph into the wings [9]. Importantly, the pigmentation (Fig. 4b) and wing expansion defects (not shown) expressed by rk>tBur flies were rescued when combined with elav-GAL80, confirming that cuticle melanization and wing expansion require RK function in the CNS. Conversely, driving a rk cDNA using the neuron-specific driver, elav-GAL4, in rk1/rk4 mutant flies rescued pigmentation at 3 h (Fig. 4c, top), indicating that restoring rk function in the CNS is sufficient to cause normal cuticle melanization at this time. This contrasts to the results obtained using the (primarily) epidermal driver, TH-GAL4, for which no such rescue was obtained. Intriguingly, no rescue was obtained at 48 h post emergence using the elav-GAL4 driver (Fig. 4c, bottom). Nevertheless, only partial rescue was obtained at this time using the rk-GAL4 driver (which does rescue wing expansion ([19], and data not shown), suggesting that the UAS-rk construct may not provide wildtype levels of RK function regardless of the GAL4 driver used.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Bursicon acts on rk-expressing neurons to cause melanization and sclerotization. a Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur or rk RNAi transgenes under the control of pan-neuronal drivers (elav-GAL4 and nsyb-GAL4). b Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur or rk RNAi transgenes under the control of rk-GAL4 and restricted to non-neuronal rk cells using elav-Gal80. c Rescue of abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female rk1/rk4 flies expressing a rk cDNA [19] under the control of the rk-GAL4, TH-GAL4, and elav-GAL4, drivers. In a–c, boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, thick central lines mark the medians, and whiskers represent data range. Red dashed lines indicate the median pigmentation level when tBur is expressed ubiquitously (rk>tBur). Results for each age were compared using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post hoc analysis. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p values < 0.01); NS: not significantly different. n = 10 for each group. d Quantification of soluble cuticular proteins extracted from wings and abdominal epidermis of elav>tBur, rk>tBur female flies with or without elav-GAL80, in three separate experiments; median is indicated by short horizontal line. For quantification of other proteins (indicated in Additional file 1: Figure S2B) see Additional file 1: Figure S7. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD, p < 0.02). Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

rk-expressing neurons required for the control of pigmentation are located in the VNS. a Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur under the control of pan-neuronal driver, elav-GAL4, whose expression was restricted to the brain using tsh-GAL80. Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b. Boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, thick central lines mark the medians, and whiskers represent data range. Red dashed line indicates the median pigmentation level when tBur is expressed ubiquitously (rk>tBur). Results were compared using a one-way ANOVA for each age group and found to not be statistically different (NS). n = 10 for each group. b Representatives pictures of 48-h-old females. Left: elav>tBur fly displaying wing expansion failure and a darker abdomen. Right: elav>tBur; tsh-GAL80 fly displaying normal pigmentation and wings. Scale bar = 1 mm

Full size image

Interestingly, elav>tBur flies exhibited postemergence sclerotization defects in both wings and abdomens, thereby also implicating RK function in neurons in this process (Fig. 4d). Surprisingly, and in contrast to what occurred for melanization, including the elav-GAL80 transgene in rk>tBur flies was not sufficient to rescue the sclerotization defect except in 48 h wings. Thus, these results suggest that RK function in the CNS is necessary but not sufficient to control cuticle sclerotization.

rickets function is required in the ventral nervous system to regulate postecdysial pigmentation

We then used different GAL4 drivers to pinpoint the rk neurons that could be the direct targets of bursicon involved in the control of cuticle melanization. To this end, we first knocked down RK function only in brain neurons by driving tBur expression using the pan-neuronal elav-GAL4 driver in combination with tsh-GAL80, which drives GAL80 (thereby inhibiting GAL4) expression in the trunk [20]. As shown in Fig. 5a, these flies did not exhibit pigmentation defects at either 3 h or 48 h post emergence, and wing expansion was also normal in these flies (Fig. 5b). Conversely, when we then drove tBur only in the VNS using a tsh-GAL4 driver most the flies died at the start of metamorphosis yet the rare escapers exhibited a rk mutant phenotype (not shown). Taken together, these results show that RK function is primarily required in the VNS for the rapid postemergence melanization of the cuticle. Interestingly, we were able to rescue the pupal lethality observed in rk>tBur animals by including the elav-GAL80 transgene, consistent with the known role for rk signaling during pupal ecdysis [18, 21].

rickets function is required for cuticle melanization in peptidergic neurons that are not the neurons that produce bursicon

Our results suggest that rk is required in the VNS to cause cuticle melanization and wing expansion. A previous study showed that bursicon release is delayed in rk4/rk4 mutant flies [11], suggesting that cuticle melanization might require RK function in the bursicon-secreting neurons themselves. To test this hypothesis, we expressed the tBur transgene in bursicon neurons using two different GAL4 drivers: CCAP-GAL4, which drives expression in all CCAP neurons (including all bursicon neurons in the adult) and burs-GAL4, which drives expression in the BURS-expressing neurons [10, 12]. As shown in Fig. 6a, these flies were entirely normal, indicating that postemergence melanization does not require an autocrine RK function in the bursicon neurons.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Peptidergic rk-expressing neurons participate in the control of melanization. a Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur in: bursicon neurons using CCAP-GAL4 (which drives expression in all bursicon neurons from the VNS [10]) and burs-GAL4 (which drives expression in all bursicon neurons [11]); and in peptidergic neurons using the dimm-GAL4 driver and restricted to non-CCAP neurons using CCAP-GAL80. b Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur under the control of peptidergic neuron drivers (dimm-GAL4 and amon-GAL4) and restricted to VNS using tsh-GAL80. c Abdominal pigmentation in 3-h- (upper panel) and 48-h-old (lower panel) female flies expressing tBur in ILP7 neurons using ilp7-GAL4; in ilp7 null mutants; and in flies (multiply) mutant for ilp2, ilp3, ilp5, and ilp7. Genotypes are coded as described in Fig. 1b; boxes indicate the first and third quartiles, thick central lines mark the medians, and whiskers represent data range. Red dashed lines indicate the median pigmentation level when tBur is expressed ubiquitously (rk>tBur). n = 10 in each group. Results for each age were compared using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD post hoc analysis. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p values ≤ 0.02 for a; p ≤ 0.01 for b and p ≤ 0.0001 for c). Results for males are presented in Additional file 1: Figure S8

Full size image

Since ecdysis involves a number of neuropeptides acting on downstream peptidergic neurons [22, 23], we then considered the possibility that cuticle melanization involved bursicon action on other peptidergic neurons. To address this possibility, we used the tBur transgene to knock down RK function in large ensembles of peptidergic neurons using the drivers, dimm-GAL4 (dimmed-GAL4) and amon-GAL4 (amontillado-GAL4) which reflect the expression of the transcription factor DIMMED, which is required for peptidergic neuron maturation [24], and of the AMONTILLADO proprotein processing enzyme, PC2 [25], respectively. (Both of these drivers are expressed in peptidergic neurons and we confirmed that they are not expressed in the adult epidermis; Additional file 1: Figure S4). As shown in Fig. 6b, expression of tBur using dimm-GAL4 caused the melanization defects characteristic of rk mutant animals, with lighter and darker pigmentation than normal in 3-h- and 48-h-old flies, respectively. Interestingly, these flies were normal in terms of wing expansion. Expression of tBur using amon-GAL4 caused pigmentation defects similar to those of rk mutants at 3 h and 48 h post emergence but, interestingly, also caused wing expansion failures (not shown), and resulted in flies with matte cuticle similar to that observed in elav>tBur and rk>tBur flies. Importantly, the defects observed when RK function was knocked down using these drivers were rescued by including the elav-GAL80 (Additional file 1: Figure S9A) and tsh-GAL80 (Fig. 6b) transgenes, confirming the localization of the rk requirement to the CNS. However, they were not rescued by including the CCAP-GAL80 transgene (Fig. 6a), consistent with the results obtained using the CCAP-GAL4 driver to knock down RK function, and the lack of co-expression of CCAP and rk-GAL4 in the VNS (Additional file 1: Figure S9B). Taken together, these results suggest that bursicon acts in paracrine rather than an autocrine manner to control cuticle pigmentation.

Downregulation of the insulin receptor has been shown to severely decrease cuticle pigmentation in Drosophila [26] suggesting that some insulin-like peptides (ilp) could participate in the regulation of this process. The only ilp known to be expressed in the VNS is ilp7 [27, 28], and we observed that at least two ilp7-immunoreactive neurons coexpress rk (Additional file 1: Figure S10). Thus, in a final attempt to identify peptidergic neurons in the VNS that could play a direct role in pigmentation, we expressed tBur using an ilp7-GAL4 driver and observed significant pigmentation defects at both 3 h and 48 h of age (Fig. 6c). Nevertheless, we did not observe any pigmentation defects in a null mutant allele for ilp7 or in flies simultaneously mutant for ilp genes ilp2, ilp3, ilp5, and ilp7 (Fig. 6c). These results suggest that some of the 20 ILP7-secreting neurons from the VNS may be direct targets of bursicon and participate in the regulation of cuticle pigmentation but that this role is not mediated by the ILP7 hormone itself, similarly to what has been reported for fertility regulation [29].

Discussion

Cuticle tanning encompasses two distinct molecular processes, melanization and sclerotization, which result, respectively, in the darkening and the hardening of the insect cuticle. Though both processes share the same initial molecular steps in the epidermis, they then diverge into two separate pathways [2, 30]. The rapid tanning that occurs after emergence has been known to be under control of a humoral factor for decades, and we also now know the molecular identity of bursicon, the key neurohormone involved in this process, and that of its receptor, DLGR2, encoded in Drosophila by the rickets (rk) gene [4, 6,7,8,9]. Mutations in the genes encoding bursicon subunits or in rk induce similar defects including a failure in wing expansion and a delay in tanning. Here, we have provided a more comprehensive description of the tanning defects of rk mutants and show that although pigmentation levels are lower than normal during the first few hours after emergence, they continue to increase during the following 2 days, such that by 48 h post emergence the flies display an overpigmentation of their abdominal cuticle. This contrasts to normal flies, in which the melanization process is essentially complete by 6 h after emergence. A potential explanation for the overpigmentation of rk mutant flies could be that the lack of sclerotization of the cuticle results in an overabsorption of pigments. Consistent with this hypothesis, we recently showed that the cuticle of rk mutant flies contain higher levels of cuticular hydrocarbons [31]. Alternatively, the lack of sclerotization could result from a higher tendency of the cuticle to form microfolds (see Additional file 1: Figure S2A), which might increase its opacity.

In addition, we developed here a semi-quantitative assay to evaluate the level of sclerotization of cuticular proteins and show that the cuticle of rk mutants contain soluble proteins during at least the first 2 days of adult life, thereby showing that bursicon and RK are involved in the crosslinking of cuticular proteins that underlies the process of sclerotization.

Although the reactions involved in cuticle tanning are well known, how bursicon causes this process to occur rapidly following emergence is still unclear. A key element for understanding this process is identifying where bursicon acts, and it has always been assumed that this hormone acts directly on the epidermis to induce the melanization and sclerotization of the overlying cuticle, which is consistent with the fact that rk is expressed in the epidermis in various insect species [19, 32, 33]. Yet, using a variety of genetic techniques, we were surprised to discover that bursicon does not act directly on the epidermis to cause cuticle melanization and sclerotization. Instead, we found that both of these actions are indirect and that melanization is mediated by peptidergic neurons in the ventral nervous system. Although we were ultimately unable to identify the molecular intermediary, our findings suggest that neurons expressing Ilp7 play a key role in this process, although the ILP7 hormone itself is not involved.

Our results challenge the classical view of bursicon action on the epidermis to regulate cuticle tanning. They also reveal unsuspected complexities in RK action. For instance, although normal melanization and wing inflation require RK function in the CNS, these functions are separable. Indeed, as shown in Table 1, whereas rk knockdown using an amon-GAL4 driver affected both wing inflation and cuticle melanization, knockdown using the dimm-GAL4 driver affected melanization but produced adults with normal wings. Similarly, whereas RK function in the CNS is necessary and sufficient to cause melanization, tissues outside of the CNS (and of the epidermis) are also involved in sclerotization. These tissues are currently unknown, but they do not include muscles, tendon cells, or hemocytes (see Table 1). Our results also raise the obvious question: what is the function of RK in the epidermal cells? Although we show that RK is not required in the epidermis for melanization or sclerotization, rk knockdown in the epidermis caused the cuticle to show microfolds (Additional file 1: Figure S2A), a matte finish (Fig. 3e and Table 1), and also caused the wings to be slightly misshapen (Fig. 3e), suggesting that in the epidermis bursicon might affect chitin organization and/or the proportion of given cuticular proteins [34].

Table 1 Postemergence maturation defects associated with disabling RK function in different cell types
Full size table

In conclusion

Our findings reveal that cuticle tanning is a complex process and challenges the classical view of a direct action of bursicon on the epidermis. We show that RK is required in the VNS for the rapid melanization and sclerotization that occurs after emergence and that these two processes likely require the action of bursicon on different targets and may involve targets outside of the CNS (and the epidermis). Future progress in understanding how the cuticle is pigmented and hardened will now require identifying the intermediaries that transmit to the epidermis the signal provided by the release of bursicon.

Methods

Drosophila stocks

Flies were raised on standard cornmeal/molasses/yeast food and maintained at 22 °C under a 12 h:12 h light:dark regime. All crosses were performed at 25 °C under 12 h:12 h light:dark regime. Unless noted, fly stocks were obtained from the Drosophila Bloomington stock center (BL; Bloomington, USA) and the Kyoto Stock Center (NIG; Kyoto, Japan): rk1 (BL3589) and rk4 (BL3590) alleles; flies mutant for ilp7 (BL30887), flies mutant for ilp2, ilp3, ilp5, and ilp7 (BL30893); UAS-RNAi rk (NIG8930-R1 [called here RNAi A] and NIG8930-R2 [called here RNAi B]), elav-GAL4 (BL8765), nsyb-GAL4 (BL51941), amon-GAL4 (BL25410), dimm-GAL4 (BL25373), hemese-GAL4 (BL8699), sr-GAL4 (BL2663), C57-GAL4 (BL32556), pnr-GAL4 (BL3039), 20XUAS-FLP (BL55805), hs-FLP (BL55805). elav-GAL80 was obtained from O. Schafer; nsyb-GAL80 was obtained from J. Simpson; rk-GAL4, UAS-rk, and CCAP-GAL80 were provided by B. White [19]; UAS-tBur was provided by A. Kopin; and tsh-GAL80 was obtained from C. Wegener. Desat(RE)-GAL4 was provided by J.-F. Ferveur; stc, FRT39 flies were obtained from G. Struhl; and ilp7-GAL4 was obtained from Y. N. Jan.

Induction of marked rk clones

To produce mosaic animals, we relied on a stock that carries the stc mutation (a mutant allele of the crinkled gene that causes cell-autonomous defects in cuticular microchaetes; [35, 36]), and an FRT site at cytological position 39. The rk4 allele was recombined onto this chromosome using standard genetic techniques. Patches in random locations were produced using a heat shock-driven FLP transgene, whereas larger patches confined to a strip along the dorsal abdomen were induced using a pnr-GAL4 driver in combination with UAS-flp. Patches of marked rk4 mutant tissues were created in rk4, stc, FRT39/rk+, FRT39 flies, whereas patches of wildtype tissues (controls) were induced in rk+, stc, FRT39/rk+, FRT39 flies.

Measurements of abdominal pigmentation

Three- and 48-h-old flies were frozen at − 20 °C and kept at this temperature until dissection. Flies were dissected under PBS and their abdomens fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde for 1 h, then rinsed and mounted in glycerol, and kept at 4 °C. Images were acquired at × 20 magnification using a Leica DFC480 camera under white light. We quantified melanization as a mean gray value (MGV) using the NIH ImageJ software [37]. Measurements were taken at the fourth segment (A4) for all experiments. Two measurements per fly were taken in this segment, one in band of pigmentation at the posterior edge of the segment, and one in the upper (lightly pigmented) part of the segment (see Additional file 1: Figure S2A for more details). All preparations for a given experiment were quantified during a single session, using the same settings. Microscope lighting conditions were set to produce readings that usually ranged between 15 (most melanized cuticle) to 220 (least melanized). A melanization score for each fly was produced by averaging the 2 readings for each segment. In addition, in order to produce a more intuitive score for which darker cuticles had larger values, the final score was obtained by subtracting this average from 300. Thus, the score was obtained using the following formula:

$$ \mathrm{Pigmentation}=-\left(\frac{\mathrm{MGV}\ \mathrm{black}\ \mathrm{strip}+\mathrm{MGV}\ \mathrm{brown}\ \mathrm{strip}}{2}\right)+300 $$

The value of 300 was chosen arbitrarily because it was the smallest value that produced positive values for all readings.

For mosaics, pigmentation was measured within patches as described above but one measurement was taken from one to three clones per fly, in at least 15 different flies.

Measurements of wing and abdomen sclerotization

Three- and 48-h-old females were frozen at − 20 °C and kept at this temperature until dissection. They were then dissected in PBS and the wings and the abdominal cuticle were separated and kept at − 80 °C for 24 h before protein extraction. Five abdomens or 5 pairs of wings were vortexed for 15 min at room temperature using tungsten balls in 100 μL of extraction buffer containing Tris (1%, pH = 7.2), 1% SDS, and cOmplete protease inhibitor, EDTA-free, EASYpack (a general cocktail of protease inhibitors; Roche, USA). After a centrifugation, 40 μL of supernatant were mixed with 10 μL of protein loading buffer and 15 μL were loaded on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and run at 110 V. Fifteen microliters of a reference extract was run as a common internal control for all experiments in order to ensure reproducibility of the staining protocol across gels. This reference extract was made as described above but using 100 abdomens or 200 wings of w1118 control flies and aliquoted and kept at − 20 °C. Gels were fixed overnight in 10% acetic acid and 30% ethanol solution and processed through a fast silver staining protocol [38]. Prominent bands were analyzed using ImageJ software. We assessed band intensity measuring its MGV and subtracting background MGV; intensity was then expressed as a percentage of the intensity measured for the reference control lane (see Additional file 1: Figure S2 for more details). Results obtained using the most conserved band are shown in the main figures; results for other bands are shown in Additional file 1: Figures S5, S6, and S7.

Immunostaining and imaging

Flies were dissected upon emergence in PBS and their VNS or epidermis was fixed for 1 h in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde. To directly observe the fluorescence from the GFP or RFP reporter, CNSs were rinsed in PBS and mounted on poly-lysine coated slides. Co-labeling for rk and CCAP or ILP7 expression was done using rk>mCherry flies processed for CCAP or ILP immunoreactivity, using a rabbit anti-CCAP antibody (used at 1:5000; a kind gift from H.-J. Agricola, Jena University, Jena, Germany) or a rabbit anti-ILP7 antibody (used at 1:1000; a kind gift from Ernst Hafen, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland), respectively. CCAP- and ILP7-immunoreactivity was visualized using an Alexa 488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (used at 1:500; Invitrogen, CA, USA). Preparations were examined under a spinning disc microscope (Olympus DSU).

Assessment of rk RNAi knockdown efficiency

Efficiency of rk RNAi knockdown when using TH-GAL4 and rk-GAL4 drivers was assessed by real-time qPCR and is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S11. Total RNA was isolated from epidermis obtained from recently emerged adult flies using Trizol (Ambion, Life Technology) following the manufacturer’s protocol and treated with DNAse I (Fermentas; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total RNA concentration and purity was estimated using a Qubit spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNAs were synthesized using Super Script II reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All cDNA samples were standardized to 12.5 ng of total RNA equivalent per μL. rk RNA expression was estimated using qPCR and Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a Strategene Mx3000P Real-Time qPCR System (Agilent Technologies). The quantification of gene expression was made using the rp49 as a housekeeping gene. The primers used for qPCR were:

For rk

rk-qF1: CTGCGGCAGAGAAGTGAGTG and

rk-qR1: CGCTGTCGTCGCTTTTGTTG

For rp49:

rp49-qF1: ATCTGATGCCCAACATCGGTTA and

rp49-qR1: CACGTTGTGCACCAGGAACTT.

Statistics

Pigmentation measurements are shown using boxplots representing the median, the 1st and 3rd quartiles, and maxima/minima. Statistically significant differences were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD post hoc analysis when samples were normally distributed or by a Kruskal Wallis test followed by Conover-Iman post hoc analysis when strong deviation from normality was detected (Shapiro test and QQ plot). In experiments involving mosaic animals (cf., Fig. 3a,b), an ANCOVA analysis was performed to determine the effect of clone size and genotype on clone pigmentation. All statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT 2016©. Soluble protein quantification is shown as a simple dot plot with median indicated.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Andersen SO. Cuticular sclerotization and tanning. Compr Mol Insect Sci. 2005;4–6:145–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moussian B. Recent advances in understanding mechanisms of insect cuticle differentiation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;40:363–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suderman RJ, Dittmer NT, Kanost MR, Kramer KJ. Model reactions for insect cuticle sclerotization: cross-linking of recombinant cuticular proteins upon their laccase-catalyzed oxidative conjugation with catechols. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36(4):353–65. SPEC. ISS

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewey EM, McNabb SL, Ewer J, Kuo GR, Takanishi CL, Truman JW, et al. Identification of the gene encoding bursicon, an insect neuropeptide responsible for cuticle sclerotization and wing spreading. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1208–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Loy T, Van Hiel MB, Vandersmissen HP, Poels J, Mendive F, Vassart G, et al. Evolutionary conservation of bursicon in the animal kingdom. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007;153:59–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fraenkel G, Hsiao C. Bursicon, a hormone which mediates tanning of the cuticle in the adult fly and other insects. J Insect Physiol. 1965;11:513–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo C-WW, Dewey EM, Sudo S, Ewer J, Hsu SY, Honegger HW, et al. Bursicon, the insect cuticle-hardening hormone, is a heterodimeric cystine knot protein that activates G protein-coupled receptor LGR2. PNAS. 2005;102:2820–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendive FM, Van Loy T, Claeysen S, Poels J, Williamson M, Hauser F, et al. Drosophila molting neurohormone bursicon is a heterodimer and the natural agonist of the orphan receptor DLGR2. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:2171–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker JD, Truman JW. Mutations in the Drosophila glycoprotein hormone receptor, rickets, eliminate neuropeptide-induced tanning and selectively block a stereotyped behavioral program. J Exp Biol. 2002;205:2555–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luan H, Lemon WC, Peabody NC, Pohl JB, Zelensky PK, Wang D, et al. Functional dissection of a neuronal network required for cuticle tanning and wing expansion in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2006;26:573–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peabody NC, Diao F, Luan H, Wang H, Dewey EM, Honegger H-W, et al. Bursicon functions within the Drosophila CNS to modulate wing expansion behavior, hormone secretion, and cell death. J Neurosci. 2008;28:14379–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luan H, Diao F, Peabody NC, White BH. Command and compensation in a neuromodulatory decision network. J Neurosci. 2012;32:880–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis MM, O’Keefe SL, Primrose DA, Hodgetts RB. A neuropeptide hormone cascade controls the precise onset of post-eclosion cuticular tanning in Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 2007;134:4395–404.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delachambre J, Delbecque JP, Provansal A, Grillot JP, De Reggi ML, Cailla HL. Total and epidermal cyclic AMP levels related to the variations of ecdysteroids and bursicon during the metamorphosis of the mealworm Tenebrio molitor L. Insect Biochem. 1979;9:95–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Honegger HW, Dewey EM, Ewer J. Bursicon, the tanning hormone of insects: recent advances following the discovery of its molecular identity. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008;194:989–1005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harwood BN, Fortin JP, Gao K, Chen C, Beinborn M, Kopin AS. Membrane tethered bursicon constructs as heterodimeric modulators of the Drosophila G protein-coupled receptor rickets. Mol Pharmacol. 2013;83:814–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harwood BN, Draper I, Kopin AS. Targeted inactivation of the rickets receptor in muscle compromises Drosophila viability. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:4091–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diao F, Elliott AD, Diao F, Shah S, White BH. Neuromodulatory connectivity defines the structure of a behavioral neural network. eLife. 2017;6:e29797.

  19. Diao F, White BH. A novel approach for directing transgene expression in Drosophila: T2A-Gal4 in-frame fusion. Genetics. 2012;190:1139–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clyne JD, Miesenböck G. Sex-specific control and tuning of the pattern generator for courtship song in Drosophila. Cell. 2008;133:354–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lahr EC, Dean D, Ewer J. Genetic analysis of ecdysis behavior in Drosophila reveals partially overlapping functions of two unrelated neuropeptides. J Neurosci. 2012;32:6819–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YJ, Zitnan D, Galizia CG, Cho KH, Adams ME. A command chemical triggers an innate behavior by sequential activation of multiple peptidergic ensembles. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1395–407.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mena W, Diegelmann S, Wegener C, Ewer J. Stereotyped responses of Drosophila peptidergic neuronal ensemble depend on downstream neuromodulators. Elife. 2016;5:22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Park D, Veenstra JA, Park JH, Taghert PH. Mapping peptidergic cells in Drosophila: where DIMM fits in. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taghert PH, Hewes RS, Park JH, O’Brien MA, Han M, Peck ME. Multiple amidated neuropeptides are required for normal circadian locomotor rhythms in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6673–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shakhmantsir I, Massad NL, Kennell JA. Regulation of cuticle pigmentation in Drosophila by the nutrient sensing insulin and TOR signaling pathways. Dev Dyn. 2014;243:393–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang CH, Belawat P, Hafen E, Jan LY, Jan YN. Drosophila egg-laying site selection as a system to study simple decision-making processes. Science (80- ). 2008;319:1679–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nässel DR, Kubrak OI, Liu Y, Luo J, Lushchak OV. Factors that regulate insulin producing cells and their output in Drosophila. Front Physiol. 2013;4(SEP):252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Grönke S, Clarke DF, Broughton S, Andrews TD, Partridge L. Molecular evolution and functional characterization of Drosophila insulin-like peptides. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen SO. Insect cuticular sclerotization: a review. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;40:166–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flaven-Pouchon J, Farine JP, Ewer J, Ferveur JF. Regulation of cuticular hydrocarbon profile maturation by Drosophila tanning hormone, bursicon, and its interaction with desaturase activity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;79:87–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa CP, Elias-Neto M, Falcon T, Dallacqua RP, Martins JR, Bitondi MMG. RNAi-mediated functional analysis of bursicon genes related to adult cuticle formation and tanning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bai H, Palli SR. Functional characterization of bursicon receptor and genome-wide analysis for identification of genes affected by bursicon receptor RNAi. Dev Biol. 2010;344:248–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. An S, Wang S, Gilbert LI, Beerntsen B, Ellersieck M, Song Q. Global identification of bursicon-regulated genes in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Struhl G, Barbash DA, Lawrence PA. Hedgehog acts by distinct gradient and signal relay mechanisms to organise cell type and cell polarity in the Drosophila abdomen. Development. 1997;124:2155–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sobala LF, Adler PN. The gene expression program for the formation of wing cuticle in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chevallet M, Luche S, Rabilloud T. Silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1852–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank colleagues and the Bloomington and Kyoto stock centers for stocks, Hans Agricola for anti-CCAP antisera, Irene Miguel-Aliaga and Ernst Hafen for anti-ILP7 antisera, and Hans-Willi Honegger for comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by FONDECYT (National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, Chile) postdoctoral scholarships #3170141 (to J.V.A) and #3180496 (to J.F-P.), FONDECYT grant #1180403 (to JE), and the Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaiso (CINV) Millennium Institute grant P09-022-F supported by the Millennium Scientific Initiative of the Ministerio de Economia, Fomento y Turismo (to JE).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Neurociencia, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaiso, Chile

    Justin Flaven-Pouchon, Javier V. Alvarez, Candy Rojas & John Ewer

Authors
  1. Justin Flaven-Pouchon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Javier V. Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Candy Rojas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Ewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JF-P and JE designed the experiments; JF-P, JVA, CR, and JE collected data; all authors analyzed data and edited the paper; JF-P and JE wrote the manuscript; JF-P, JVA, and JE obtained funding; JE supervised the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ewer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Pigmentation of abdomen in males for which RK function has been downregulated ubiquitously, or specifically in the epidermis or in the CNS. Figure S2. Details of methodology used to quantify abdominal cuticle pigmentation and sclerotization. Figure S3. rk knockdown in the epidermis does not induce pigmentation defects. Figure S4. Epidermal expression of GAL4 drivers used in this study. Figure S5. Sclerotization, quantified using other protein bands, in rk mutant females and in females expressing ubiquitous knockdown of RK function. Figure S6. Sclerotization, quantified using other protein bands, showing that RK function is not required in the epidermis to regulate sclerotization. Figure S7. Sclerotization, quantified using other protein bands, show that RK function is necessary but not sufficient in the CNS to regulate sclerotization. Figure S8. Abdominal pigmentation in males in which RK function was downregulated in peptidergic, CCAP, and ILP7 neurons. Figure S9. RK function is necessary in peptidergic neurons that are not CCAP immunopositive to regulate melanization. Figure S10. Some ILP7-immunopositive neurons express rk. Figure S11. rk knockdown efficiency. (PDF 10369 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flaven-Pouchon, J., Alvarez, J.V., Rojas, C. et al. The tanning hormone, bursicon, does not act directly on the epidermis to tan the Drosophila exoskeleton. BMC Biol 18, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-0742-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-0742-5

Keywords

  • Cuticle
  • Melanization
  • Sclerotization
  • rickets gene
  • Neuropeptide

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us