- Research article
- Open Access
Downregulation of GeBP-like α factor by MiR827 suggests their involvement in senescence and phosphate homeostasis
BMC Biology volume 19, Article number: 90 (2021)
Leaf senescence is a genetically controlled degenerative process intimately linked to phosphate homeostasis during plant development and responses to environmental conditions. Senescence is accelerated by phosphate deficiency, with recycling and mobilization of phosphate from senescing leaves serving as a major phosphate source for sink tissues. Previously, miR827 was shown to play a significant role in regulating phosphate homeostasis, and induction of its expression was also observed during Arabidopsis leaf senescence. However, whether shared mechanisms underlie potentially common regulatory roles of miR827 in both processes is not understood. Here, we dissect the regulatory machinery downstream of miR827.
Overexpression or inhibited expression of miR827 led to an acceleration or delay in the progress of senescence, respectively. The transcriptional regulator GLABRA1 enhancer-binding protein (GeBP)-like (GPLα) gene was identified as a possible target of miR827. GPLα expression was elevated in miR827-suppressed lines and reduced in miR827-overexpressing lines. Furthermore, heterologous co-expression of pre-miR827 in tobacco leaves reduced GPLα transcript levels, but this effect was eliminated when pre-miR827 recognition sites in GPLα were mutated. GPLα expression is induced during senescence and its inhibition or overexpression resulted in senescence acceleration and inhibition, accordingly. Furthermore, GPLα expression was induced by phosphate deficiency, and overexpression of GPLα led to reduced expression of phosphate transporter 1 genes, lower leaf phosphate content, and related root morphology. The encoded GPLα protein was localized to the nucleus.
We suggest that MiR827 and the transcription factor GPLα may be functionally involved in senescence and phosphate homeostasis, revealing a potential new role for miR827 and the function of the previously unstudied GPLα. The close interactions between senescence and phosphate homeostasis are further emphasized by the functional involvement of the two regulatory components, miR827 and GPLα, in both processes and the interactions between them.
Leaf senescence is a genetically controlled degenerative process that leads to cell death [1,2,3]. During senescence, the cellular structure, metabolic activities, and physiological role of the leaf are greatly altered. Chloroplasts degenerate and the photosynthetic apparatus disassembles [4, 5]. Biochemical processes that occur at the onset of senescence include altered gene expression, macromolecule degradation, membrane destabilization, and fluctuations in hormone levels [3, 6]. It is suggested that during the evolution of senescence, different biochemical, cellular, integrative, and adaptive systems were progressively added to the ancient primary core process as the evolving plant encountered new environmental and developmental contexts . Senescence occurs as part of normal development; however, it can be induced prematurely by stressful environmental stimuli [8, 9].
To cope with nutrient-deprived environments, plants must sense changes in external and internal mineral nutrient concentrations and adjust their nutrient metabolisms to meet the demands of plant growth . In annual plants, including Arabidopsis, leaf senescence is highly responsive to nutrient stress. A limited supply of micro- or macronutrients can induce senescence in leaves in order to mobilize resources, such as inorganic phosphate (Pi) and nitrate, to the younger sink organs, thereby ensuring reproduction and contributing to nutrient-use efficiency [11,12,13,14,15,16]. The leaf is a sink for nitrogen (N) and mineral nutrients during the early stages of development and becomes a nutrient source once it begins to senesce. Senescence involves complex metabolic changes to enable nutrient recycling and allocation [17,18,19]. Nutrient salvage from older leaves has the adaptive value of recycling nutrients that may be limiting in the environment or that are energetically costly to acquire [14, 17, 20].
Senescence is characterized by significant changes in gene expression patterns [21, 22], including repression of genes, such as those associated with photosynthesis, and induction of others, including senescence-associated genes (SAGs) that participate in different metabolic and regulatory aspects of senescence [22, 23]. The available knowledge about senescence regulation clearly suggests that it is composed of a complex of pathways forming a network responsible for activation of the different SAGs [1, 24, 25]. At least some of the SAGs’ regulation occurs at the transcriptional level [26,27,28]. The complexity of senescence regulation is also demonstrated by the involvement of a vast number of different transcription factors from different families [24, 29]. The involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in senescence regulation has been recently reviewed [30, 31]. In Arabidopsis, miR164 was identified as a key player in senescence through control of its target, the senescence transcriptional activator gene ORE1/AtNAC092 . MiR319 was also shown in Arabidopsis to positively regulate leaf senescence by regulating jasmonic acid biosynthesis . Additional studies suggest the involvement of other miRNAs in senescence [34,35,36]. We previously conducted large-scale analyses to identify senescence-inducible miRNAs . Many of the identified miRNAs were reported to be involved in nutrient responsiveness, which is consistent with the nutrient-remobilization process taking place during senescence. Among these, miR827 was found to be significantly induced during leaf senescence, its expression peaking in late senescence . MiR827 was shown to play significant roles in regulating Pi homeostasis in plants in a nitrate-dependent fashion [38,39,40,41]. Pi deprivation results in induction of miR827 expression, which post-transcriptionally represses transcript accumulation of its target gene nitrogen limitation adaptation (NLA) [39, 42]. NLA can mediate the ubiquitination and degradation of the plasma-membrane-localized phosphate transporter 1 (PHT1) family of Pi transporters, thereby affecting Pi homeostasis .
Maintenance of Pi homeostasis is crucial for crop production [43, 44]. Low levels of available Pi in the soil limit biomass and yield potential, and therefore, remobilization of Pi within the plant is important [44, 45]. Pi remobilization from senescing leaves is a major source of Pi for sink tissues. While it is clear that plants are efficient at recycling Pi from senescing leaves, our knowledge of the molecular components involved in the process is limited compared to studies of N remobilization [46, 47]. Plants can remobilize over 50% of the Pi from senescing leaves . Thus, translocation of Pi from older to developing leaves is quantitatively important. Pi remobilization and transportation are effected by the action of hormones, transcription factors, and Pi-scavenging enzymes . Pi transporters are critical for Pi allocation and remobilization within plants [49,50,51]. The Arabidopsis Pi transporter PHT1;5 mobilizes Pi between source and sink organs and influences the interaction between Pi homeostasis and ethylene signaling . PHT1;5 overexpression resulted in altered Pi remobilization and premature senescence. PHT4;6 was also found to be involved in senescence-associated processes in Arabidopsis .
In this report, the close interactions between senescence and Pi homeostasis are further emphasized by the functional involvement of two regulatory components: miR827 and the GLABRA1 enhancer-binding protein (GeBP)-like regulatory factor GPLα, in both processes.
Altered expression of miR827 is associated with modified leaf senescence
Our previous analysis revealed that mature miR827 is highly induced during leaf senescence . Expression analyses of pre-miR827 resulted in similar kinetics and fold induction, thus verifying enhanced transcript accumulation during early and late stages of natural senescence, as well as during dark-induced senescence of detached leaves (Additional file 1: Figure S1A, C). To determine whether senescence induction by miR827 is transcriptionally regulated, a ca. 1.3-kb sequence upstream of the transcription start site was cloned in front of the GFP reporter gene to construct miR827Pro:GFP. Arabidopsis plants transformed with this vector were examined for GFP expression. In both natural and artificial senescence of detached leaves, GFP expression was induced during late senescence, with the GFP signal colocalizing with yellowing sections of the leaves (Additional file 1: Figure S1B, D).
To investigate the possible involvement of miR827 in senescence, pre-miR827 expression was modified. For overexpression, the 35S constitutive promoter was cloned in front of the precursor sequences of miR827 and the constructed vector (Additional file 2: Figure S2A) was used to generate transgenic miR827-overexpressing plants in which pre-miR827 transcript was strongly induced, about 300-fold compared to the wild type (Additional file 2: Figure S2B). Suppression of miR827 was achieved by employing the target mimicry method (short tandem target mimic—STTM) (Franco-Zorrilla et al., 2007; Yan et al., 2012). The miR827–STTM sequence was overexpressed by the S35 promoter (Additional file 2: Figure S2A), and in the resulting Arabidopsis plants, miR827 transcript level was less than 10% of that measured in the wild type (Additional file 2: Figure S2B). In plants overexpressing pre-miR827, accelerated natural senescence of attached leaves was observed as well as acceleration of dark-induced senescence (Fig. 1a, d). Early senescence in the miR827-overexpressing lines was indicated by an accelerated decline in chlorophyll and protein contents in same-position leaves (Fig. 1b, c, e, f). In plants suppressed of miR827 expression retardation of senescence was observed, as indicated by late development of yellowing in the miR827–STTM lines (Fig. 1a, d), as well as by a retarded decrease in chlorophyll and protein contents in those lines compared to the wild type during both natural and dark-induced senescence (Fig. 1b, c, e, f).
Consequences of altered miR827 expression to gene expression
NLA (At1G02860) has been validated as a target of miR827 in Arabidopsis [42, 53], and PHT5;1/VPT1 (At1G63010) is a suggested target of miR827 . PHT5;1/VPT1 is essential for Pi homeostasis [54, 55]. A search for additional candidate miR827 targets using psRNATarget  suggested a GPL gene (At4G00610), hereafter termed GPLα.
The predicted miR827-recognition site in the GPLα sequence is shown in Additional file 3: Figure S3. To examine actual cleavage of GPLα, 5′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) assay was employed. Cleavage of GPLα in Arabidopsis could not be identified within the predicted target site; it was, however, identified (in 5 out of 13 incidences examined) 10 bases downstream of the 3′-end of the putative recognition site and an additional 8 cleavage sites were spread further downstream (Additional file 3: Figure S3). To further examine the relationship between miR827 and GPLα, we transiently co-expressed both in tobacco leaves using Agrobacterium infiltration assay and examined the consequences to GPLα transcript level. Co-expression of GPLα with pre-miR827 resulted in a ca. 3-fold decrease in its transcript level compared to co-expression with the empty cloning vector as a control (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, mutations in the predicted miR827-recognition site in GPLα (Additional file 3: Figure S3) resulted in nullification of the observed miR827-mediated decrease in GPLα transcript level (Fig. 2a), supporting functional involvement of miR827 in the regulation of GPLα. These mutations by themselves did not affect GPLα stability (Fig. 2a). Control experiments revealed the inability of grape Vv-miR171, which is unrelated to GPLα, to affect its transcript levels, whereas it was functional in reducing the transcript level of its verified target Vv-SCL15 (Fig. 2b, c ).
Experiments were performed to examine the effects of altered miR827 expression on its validated target gene NLA, as well as on PHT5;1 and GPLα expression. Expression of NLA, PHT5;1, and GPLα was measured during young, mature, early senescence and late senescence stages . In the wild type, all genes were induced toward the late stage of senescence (Fig. 3a–c). NLA expression was low at the young, mature, and early senescence stages and then increased in late senescence, as previously reported (Fig. 3a) . PHT5;1 expression declined at the mature leaf stage compared to that measured at the young leaf stage and then increased again during early and late senescence stages (Fig. 3b). Expression of GPLα increased only in late senescence (Fig. 3c). To determine the effects of altering miR827 expression on these three genes, their expression was measured in transgenic miR827-overexpressing and silenced plants. A clear increase in the transcript levels of NLA, PHT5;1, and GPLα was observed in the two miR827–STTM lines, whereas their transcript levels were reduced in the two miR827-overexpressing lines (Fig. 3a–c).
To further examine the relationship between miR827 and GPLα expression, the latter was characterized in miR827-overexpressing and miR827-silenced transgenic lines and compared to the expression of two SAGs—BFN1 (a senescence-induced nuclease ) and SAG12 (a senescence-induced protease )—as markers of senescence progression. The expression of GPLα, BFN1, and SAG12 was measured at different times during natural leaf senescence and plotted versus chlorophyll content, to enable comparing their expression in the miR827-altered lines. Expression of the genes in the wild type was generally correlated and showed an accelerated increase when chlorophyll level was reduced to about 0.5 mg/g fresh weight (Additional file 4: Figure S4). Expression of the three genes was then examined in the transgenic miR827-overexpressing Arabidopsis in which senescence is enhanced. Expression of GPLα was suppressed whereas expression of both BFN1 and SAG12 continued to be induced as senescence progressed and chlorophyll levels decreased, suggesting an effect of miR827 on GPLα expression (Additional file 4: Figure S4). On the other hand, expression of GPLα in the miR827–STTM lines was considerably higher than that of BFN1 and SAG12 (Additional file 4: Figure S4), whereas in the wild type, it was lower. The expression of BFN1 and SAG12 was induced at a later stage of senescence in the miR827–STTM lines, as indicated by a rise in their transcript level when chlorophyll content decreased, relative to that observed in the wild type (Additional file 4: Figure S4).
Altered GPLα expression affects senescence progression
GPLα expression increased significantly, mainly during the late stage of natural and dark-induced senescence (Additional file 5: Figure S5A, C). To determine whether senescence induction of GPLα is regulated by its promoter, sequences encompassing about 1.3 kb upstream of the transcription start site were cloned in front of the GFP coding sequence to construct GPLαPro:GFP. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants transformed with this vector were examined for GFP expression by following fluorescence. In both natural and artificially (dark)-induced senescence, GFP expression was induced during advanced senescence stages and the GFP signal overlapped with yellowing leaf sections (Additional file 5: Figure S5B, D).
To investigate the involvement of GPLα in senescence, its expression was either suppressed or overexpressed in the two Arabidopsis accessions: Columbia (Col-0) and Landsberg erecta (Ler). Vectors for generating GPLα-overexpressing lines were constructed by activating GPLα with the 35S constitutive promoter (Additional file 6: Figure S6A), resulting in GPLα–OE1 and GPLα–OE2 (Col-0), and GPLα–OE3 and GPLα–OE4 (Ler). GPLα expression in the transgenic lines was about 100-fold higher than in the wild type (Additional file 6: Figure S6B, C). Suppression of GPLα expression using an RNA interference (RNAi) construct (Additional file 6: Figure S6A) resulted in GPLα–SI1 and GPLα–SI2 (Col-0), and GPLα–SI3 and GPLα–SI4 (Ler), in which GPLα expression was suppressed to less than 10% of that measured in the wild type (Additional file 6: Figure S6B, C). In addition, two Arabidopsis T-DNA insertional mutants in GPLα were used: ET2099.Ds3.07.28.00.b.544 (Col-0 background) termed GPLα–KO1 and GK-252G05–014573 (Ler background) termed GPLα–KO2 (Additional file 6: Figure S6A). In both of these mutants, expression of GPLα was suppressed to less than 10% of that measured in the respective wild types (Additional file 6: Figure S6D).
GPLα overexpression resulted in inhibition of both natural (Fig. 4a) and dark-induced (Fig. 4d) senescence in the two independent lines compared to the wild type (Fig. 4a, d). Delayed senescence in the GPLα-overexpressing lines was indicated by a retarded decline in both chlorophyll and protein contents in same-position leaves compared to the wild types during natural senescence (Fig. 4b, c) and dark-induced senescence (Fig. 4e, f). Similar retardation of senescence was observed in the Ler accession (Additional file 7: Figure S7). Suppression of GPLα expression resulted in acceleration of both natural (Additional file 7: Figure S7A) and dark-induced (Additional file 7: Figure S7D) senescence. Accordingly, measurements of chlorophyll and protein contents in the GPLα-suppressed lines revealed lower levels than those in the wild type during both natural (Additional file 7: Figure S7B, C) and dark-induced (Additional file 7: Figure S7E, F) senescence. Accelerated senescence was apparent when suppression of GPLα expression was achieved by either RNAi or T-DNA mutations (Fig. 4). Similar results were obtained for the Ler accession (Additional file 7: Figure S7).
Regulation of miR827 and GPLα expression in response to Pi availability and nuclear localization of GPLα
MiR827 shows increased expression in response to reduced Pi availability [38, 42]. To learn more about the responses of both GPLα and miR827 to Pi limitation, their expression was measured simultaneously in response to transfer from full-nutrient medium to a Pi-deficient one. Arabidopsis seedlings (Col-0 and Ler) were grown for 10 days on half-strength MS medium and then transferred to either full-nutrient or Pi-deficient medium for 10 days and both miR827 and GPLα transcript levels were measured by quantitative (q) RT-PCR. Expression of miR827, in both accessions, was found to be induced about 10- to 15-fold under Pi deficiency compared to that measured in the full-nutrient medium, as reported previously  (Fig. 5A). GPLα expression was also induced, albeit more moderately, under Pi deficiency, increasing to about 4- and 7-fold compared to growth on full-nutrient medium in Col-0 and Ler accessions, respectively (Fig. 5B).
Expression kinetics of miR827 and GPLα was simultaneously measured following transfer of 10-day-old seedlings from full-nutrient to Pi-deficient medium. Leaf and root tissues were sampled daily for 11 days following the transfer. In leaves, miR827 expression responded rapidly, in a matter of hours, to the change: it began to increase linearly, reaching about 150-fold its initial expression on day 2 (Additional file 8: Figure S8A). After this striking increase, expression decreased until day 7 to a level that was about 20-fold higher than its initial one; after that, it remained fairly constant (Additional file 8: Figure S8A). Expression of GPLα, measured simultaneously in the leaves, changed very mildly, with a tendency to increase until day 4 when it was sharply induced and increased about 25-fold compared to its initial expression (Additional file 8: Figure S8A). After this peak, GPLα expression decreased close to its initial expression level.
In the roots, miR827 expression was induced following exposure to Pi deficiency, similar to its kinetics in the leaves, but to a lower level (Additional file 8: Figure S8B). MiR827 expression peaked after 2 days of Pi deficiency, to about 8-fold its initial level, followed by a decrease toward day 7, after which it remained low. Expression of GPLα remained low initially, increasing only slightly during the first 2 days after exposure to Pi deficiency; this was followed by an increase in expression level to a peak on day 4, at about 12-fold its initial expression (Additional file 8: Figure S8B). This increase occurred concomitantly with the reduction in miR827 expression level.
To determine whether induction of miR827 and GPLα is regulated by the genes’ upstream promoters, about 1.3 kb upstream of the transcription start site were cloned for each of the genes in front of the GFP coding sequence to construct vectors miR827Pro:GFP and GPLαPro:GFP. Transgenic plants transformed with these vectors were examined for GFP expression by fluorescence imaging. For both promoters, Pi deficiency resulted in induced GFP signal in both leaves and roots (Fig. 5C, D). Under full Pi sufficiency, no GFP signal was detected (Fig. 5C, D).
To localize GPLα protein in the cells, its coding sequence was translationally fused 3′ to the GFP coding sequence under the control of the 35S promoter and the resulting construct was used in an Arabidopsis transient-expression assay. Confocal microscopy analyses of the leaves revealed localization of the GFP signal to the nuclei due to the presence of the GPLα sequence (Fig. 5F). Localization of GPLα-GFP to the nuclei was verified in transient-expression assay in which GFP signal was observed to overlap with DAPI-stained nuclei (Additional file 9: Figure S9). In control plants, which were infiltrated with GFP under the control of the 35S promoter, GFP signal was present in the cytoplasm as well as in the nuclei, as is characteristic for this protein (Fig. 5E). Nuclear localization of GPLα and the presence of putative nuclear localization sequences were also predicted by the bioinformatics tools ePlant  and AtSubP , accordingly.
MiR827 and GPLα are involved in root response to Pi availability
Plant developmental responses to Pi deficiency include major alterations in root architecture, such as a reduction in primary-root growth [62, 63]. To determine the possible involvement of miR827 and GPLα in this response, we examined root phenotypes in Arabidopsis plants in which expression of these genes was altered. When grown under optimal nutrient conditions, there was no apparent difference in root development between the wild type and either miR827-overexpressing/suppressed or GPLα-overexpressing/suppressed plants. Arabidopsis (Col-0) seedlings were grown on Pi-sufficient medium for 10 days and then transferred to Pi-deficient medium for an additional 7–10 days of growth. Plants overexpressing miR827 exhibited accelerated growth rate of the primary root, which was thus about 50% longer than that in the wild type (Fig. 6a, b). In miR827-suppressed plants grown under Pi deficiency, primary-root elongation was inhibited by about 20% (Fig. 6a, b). In the Arabidopsis mutants with modified GPLα expression, the opposite effect was observed: under Pi-deficient conditions, primary-root growth was inhibited in the GPLα-overexpressing lines, resulting in a low but significant 10% reduction in average primary-root length (Fig. 6c, d). On the other hand, in transgenic plants in which GPLα expression was suppressed by either RNAi or T-DNA insertional mutations, primary-root growth was accelerated under Pi deficiency, resulting in an average 20% increase in length (Fig. 6c, d). Similar effects of altered GPLα expression on primary-root elongation were observed for the Ler accession (Fig. 6e, f). The acceleration effect of GPLα suppression on root elongation could be reversed by overexpressing GPLα in the GPLα–KO2 mutant, which resulted in primary-root elongation similar to that measured for the wild type grown under Pi deficiency (Additional file 10: Figure S10).
GPLα is involved in regulation of PHT1 expression in response to Pi availability
MiR827 is known to be involved in Pi homeostasis through the transcript-level regulation of its target gene NLA which mediates degradation of the PHT1 family of Pi transporters [39, 64]. We examined the possible involvement of GPLα in the regulation of PHT1 genes as well. Arabidopsis seedlings grown for 2 weeks on plates with Pi-sufficient medium were transferred to Pi-deficient medium for 7 days, and gene expression was analyzed. To verify that under our working conditions, Pi-deficiency-induced genes are activated, expression of PHT1  and Phosphate1 (PHO1) , encoding for H+/Pi cotransporter and the Pi exporter, respectively, was measured following growth on the Pi-deficient medium. Both PHT1 and PHO1 are known to be regulated indirectly, at least in part, by miR827 and miR399, respectively . Clear and high induction of transcript levels of both genes was observed (Additional file 11: Figure S11).
Expression of all nine members of the PHT1 gene family of Arabidopsis  was measured in transgenic lines overexpressing GPLα. All nine genes had reduced transcript levels in the two independent GPLα-overexpressing lines compared to those measured in the wild type following 7 days of growth in Pi-deficient medium (Fig. 7a). For PHT1;1, PHT1;5, and PHT1;7, the reduction was mild, to about 10–30% of that measured in the wild type (Fig. 7a); for PHT1;3 and PHT1;6, the reduction was very strong, 90 and 65% of that found in the wild type, respectively (Fig. 7a). For four of the PHT1 genes, PHT1;1 to PHT1;4, similar analyses were performed in transgenic Arabidopsis lines of both Col-0 and Ler accessions in which GPLα was either overexpressed or suppressed. In both accessions and for all four PHT1 genes, expression was reduced in the GPLα-overexpressing lines and elevated in the GPLα-suppressed lines (Fig. 7b). Whereas the effect was mild for PHT1;1 (Fig. 7b), in PHT1;3, both reduction and induction of expression in the GPLα-overexpressed and suppressed lines, respectively, were high (Fig. 7b).
To examine whether GPLα is involved in the regulation of other genes known to be induced by Pi deficiency, their expression was examined in the GPLα-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines. No difference in expression was observed between GPLα-overexpressing and wild type lines following exposure to Pi deficiency for any of those genes (Additional file 12: Figure S12).
Altered GPLα expression results in modified Pi levels
GPLα expression was found to be regulated by Pi deficiency, and expression of PHT1 genes encoding phosphate transporters was altered in transgenic Arabidopsis in which GPLα expression was modified. Experiments were therefore performed to examine the effects of modified GPLα expression on total phosphorus (P) and Pi content. Modulation of miR827 expression was previously found to affect cellular Pi content, with overexpression of miR827 resulting in an increase in Pi and P levels . To confirm this effect under our experimental conditions, both Pi and P contents were measured in leaves of Arabidopsis lines in which miR827 was either overexpressed or suppressed and which were grown hydroponically in Pi-sufficient media. Total P content increased to a large extent and more than doubled in two independent transgenic lines in which miR827 was overexpressed compared to that measured in the wild type (Fig. 8a). On the other hand, suppression of miR827 did not result in a decrease in P content in the miR827-suppressed lines compared to that measured for the wild type plants (Fig. 8a). Pi content increased about 2-fold in the miR827-overexpressing lines compared to the wild type, and miR827 suppression also had an impact on Pi content, resulting in a ca. 30% decrease (Fig. 8a). The effect of GPLα expression modification on P and Pi contents was studied in the two Arabidopsis accessions, Col-0 and Ler. In Col-0 GPLα-overexpressing lines, total P levels were not significantly different from the wild type although they tended to be lower in the former (Fig. 8b). In the GPLα-suppressed lines, including the two independent RNAi lines GPLα-SI1 and GPLα-SI2 and the T-DNA mutant GPLα-KO1, the measured levels of total P were about 30–40% higher than those measured in the wild type (Fig. 8b). Similar measurements of Pi levels revealed about 40–50% reduction in the two GPLα-overexpressing lines examined compared to the wild type, whereas in the three independent GPLα-suppressed transgenic Arabidopsis Col-0 lines, Pi levels were about 25% higher than in the wild type (Fig. 8b). The same analyses were performed in the parallel transgenic Arabidopsis Ler accession in which GPLα expression was modified. Total P content was lower in the GPLα-overexpressing plants compared to the wild type whereas in the three independent GPLα-suppressed plants, P level was higher (Fig. 8c). Pi content in the GPLα-suppressed Arabidopsis Ler plants was lower than that in the wild type, but higher than that of the wild type in the transgenic plants with suppressed expression (Fig. 8c).
A marked number of senescence-regulated miRNAs have been reported to be nutrient-responsive . In leaf senescence, nutrient recycling and remobilization to developing sink tissues are of major importance [14, 17]. MiR408 and miR827, which exhibit the strongest induction in expression during leaf senescence, were subjected to further functional analyses. The study of miR408 revealed its significant involvement in Arabidopsis abiotic stress responses . In the current study, we performed a detailed investigation of miR827.
Effect of miR827-altered expression on Arabidopsis gene expression and leaf senescence
NLA has been validated as a target of miR827 in Arabidopsis [42, 53]. NLA, a RING-type ubiquitin E3 ligase, can mediate ubiquitination and degradation of the plasma-membrane-localized PHT1 transporters, thereby negatively regulating their levels and affecting Pi homeostasis [39, 42]. PHT5;1/VPT1, suggested to be a target of miR827 [42, 68], encodes an SPX domain protein that functions in Arabidopsis as a vacuolar Pi transporter shown to be essential for Pi homeostasis [54, 55]. In rice, both orthologs of PHT1;5/VPT1—OsSPX-MFS1 and OsSPX-MFS2—were validated as targets of miR827, whereas no cleavage of the OsNLA transcript, which has a potential miR827 target, was detected . In this study in Arabidopsis, we considered GPLα as an additional candidate target of miR827. GPLα is a member of the GeBP/GPL gene family, which encodes unconventional leucine-zipper transcription factors. Different members of this family have been reported to be involved in different developmental and stress responses [70,71,72,73].
Expression of NLA, PHT5;1/VPT1, and GPLα was found to be markedly induced when miR827 expression was also significantly induced (Fig. 3). We previously showed that while full-length NLA transcript increases during late senescence, its putative miR827-guided cleavage product increases even more strongly . Thus, incoherent senescence regulation is observed for the NLA target gene with miR827, suggesting that miR827 moderates the target gene’s expression during senescence rather than acting as an on/off switch.
Clear consequences to the target gene NLA, as well as to PHT5;1/VPT1 and GPLα transcript levels, were visualized following manipulation of pre-miR827 expression in transgenic plants. While the effect on NLA transcript level was consistent with it being a target of miR827 as reported previously [39, 42], the consequences to GPLα expression support the notion that it may also be a target of miR827.
We examined the consequences of both inhibition and overexpression of pre-miR827. Overexpression of a pre-miRNA may not always be fully reflected in equivalently higher levels of the mature miRNA due to possible post-transcriptional processing events . However, our measurements of pre-miR827 transcript levels during both senescence and Pi starvation were in agreement with the induction of the mature miR827 [37, 42]. Furthermore, the consequences of pre-miR827 overexpression for NLA level and P/Pi content found in our study (Fig. 3a and Fig. 8) were similar to those reported previously [38, 39, 42].
The effects of pre-miR827 overexpression and inhibition on GPLα transcript level support the possibility that the latter is also a target of miR827. Further support stems from the inverse trends in the kinetics of GPLα and pre-miR827 expression under Pi-deficient growth conditions (Additional file 8: Figure S8). A potentially relatively close relationship was also discerned from the differential effect of altered miR827 expression on GPLα expression compared to its effect on other SAGs, including BFN1, involved in nuclear DNA degradation during late senescence [58, 74, 75], and SAG12, a cysteine protease with a role in N remobilization [27, 76]. The level of GPLα expression was clearly more affected than those of BFN1 and SAG12 by altered miR827 expression.
Involvement of miR827 in the regulation of GPLα is also supported by the observed reduction in GPLα transcript level following transient co-expression with miR827, which was nullified by mutations in the predicted miR827-recognition site (Fig. 2). The pairing score of the predicted recognition site in GPLα was not the highest; however, it does fulfill the criteria suggested to be required for miRNA targets in Arabidopsis . We were able to identify cleavage sites downstream of the predicted recognition site but not in the expected site within GPLα. Identification of cleavage sites 3′ to the miRNA recognition site have been suggested to represent rapid and progressive transcript degradation [78, 79].
The effect of altered miR827 expression on senescence is likely the result of a combined function in regulating the expression of NLA and GPLα. Mutant plants that were deficient in NLA displayed earlier onset of senescence compared to wild type plants. However, this enhanced-senescence phenotype was only observed under N-limiting conditions and not under optimal growth conditions . The involvement of NLA in senescence induced by N deficiency has been recently revealed . ORE1, known to be key transcription factor regulating age-dependent leaf senescence in Arabidopsis [82, 83], was identified as a downstream target of NLA . ORE1 protein stability was found to be controlled by the polyubiquitination–proteasome system involving NLA as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and PHO2/UBC24 as the partner E2 conjugase. It is likely that at least some of the consequences of miR827 overexpression for senescence acceleration, observed in our study, are mediated via NLA post-translational regulation of ORE1. Elevated miR827 expression resulted in reduced NLA, which in turn led to elevated ORE1 and acceleration of senescence (Fig. 9). Since in our study, the observed consequence of altered miR827 expression to senescence was observed under optimal growth conditions, it is suggested that regulation of ORE1 homeostasis by NLA/miR827 operates not only under N deficiency-induced senescence, but is part of the delicate regulatory mechanism governing fine-tuning control of senescence. In addition, part of miR827’s effect on leaf senescence could be attributed to its effect on GPLα expression. Induced expression of miR827 results in inhibited expression of GPLα. Since GPLα has a negative regulatory effect, senescence is accelerated (Fig. 9).
Altered progress of senescence could result from developmental variability between plants, as well as from different environmental conditions. In this study, comparisons of the different mutant Arabidopsis lines were performed in parallel; thus, the different lines were subjected to the same growth conditions suggesting that the observed modifications in senescence progress are likely resulting from the genetic alterations in miR827 or GPLα. We have not observed any consequences to overall plant development in the different lines investigated, which might have led to alterations in senescence initiation.
GPLα is involved in regulation of senescence
Functional analysis of GPLα indicated its possible involvement in senescence. Under optimal growth conditions, no apparent phenotypes were observed for plants with mutated GPLα expression. This fits well with GPLα-specific expression in late senescence (Fig. 3). Other GeBP/GPL genes, including GeBP and GPL1, 2, and 3, have been shown to be involved in a subset of cytokinin responses . Overexpressing a version of GPL2 with constitutive transcriptional activation activity exhibited retarded growth, early senescence, and necrotic lesion phenotypes . Phylogeny analysis of the Arabidopsis GeBP/GPL family members indicated that GPLα is distant from GeBP and GPL1, 2, and 3 . Still, GPLα was found to have a repressive effect on senescence resembling the repressive-type function of the other described GeBP/GPL factors.
Both miR827 and GPLα are involved in regulation of Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis
Previous research has provided ample evidence for miR827’s involvement in Pi homeostasis [38, 39]. The observed induction of GPLα following exposure to Pi deficiency supports its involvement in Pi homeostasis as well; however, its late induction, 3–4 days after exposure to Pi deficiency, suggests its involvement in a rather late response to the stress compared to miR827. In this late P-response stage, when Pi deficiency becomes an extreme stress, a specific set of genes are induced  and regulation of Pi homeostasis, with GPLα involvement, might change.
Manipulation of miR827 expression resulted in altered contents of Pi and P (Fig. 8) as reported previously . Interestingly, in both studies, the effect of miR827 overexpression on P/Pi content was much more significant than that of miR827 inhibition. This suggests that reducing the level of NLA, which mediates degradation of the PHT1 transporters, has a more prominent role in Pi homeostasis. Accordingly, a mutation in NLA results in a more significant effect of increased P/Pi content compared to the effect of overexpressing NLA, which results in a mild reduction in P/Pi content in Arabidopsis .
Altered expression of GPLα also had a clear but opposite effect on P/Pi content. Overexpression of GPLα resulted in decreased P/Pi levels, whereas suppression did not have a clear effect. Thus, GPLα seems to act as a negative regulator of Pi accumulation, similar to its negative effect on senescence.
Changes in response to Pi deficiency are well known to include a reduction in primary-root growth and an increase in density and length of the lateral roots and root hairs [63, 85, 86]. The consequences of altered expression of either GPLα or miR827 to root development further support the involvement of both genes in Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis. The change in internal Pi level as a result of altered miR827 expression fits with the observed root-length phenotype. The opposite effect was observed on primary-root length in GPLα-transgenic lines (Figs. 6 and 8). These results further support GPLα’s involvement in Pi homeostasis.
NLA directs degradation of the PHT1 transporters [87, 88], and miR827’s function in Pi homeostasis is known to be mediated by regulation of NLA transcript levels [38, 39]. GPLα was found in this study to be involved in the modulation of PHT1 expression (Fig. 7) with no effect on the expression of a few other examined Pi-starvation-related genes. This inhibitory effect of GPLα on PHT1 expression would explain the reduced levels of P/Pi measured in the GPLα-overexpressing lines.
Plant Pi transporters are known to be under complex regulation, by different transcription factors, such as MYB-, WRKY-, or BHLH-type involved in transcriptional regulation of PHT [64, 89]. The central and important regulatory role of GPLα is suggested by its effect on the expression of all PHT1 genes. GPLα has a negative regulatory effect on PHT1 gene expression as well as on P/Pi content in the plant. Similar negative regulation on Pi-stress-induced responses in plants has been suggested for MYB62 .
Thus, a negative regulatory function of GPLα is suggested for both senescence and Pi-related responses. Other members of the GeBP/GPL gene family have been previously suggested to function as negative regulators: GeBP was suggested to act as a repressor of leaf cell fate , and GPL1, GPL2, and GPL3 were shown to play a repressive role in the determination of final organ size and cell expansion . These GPL genes have also been suggested to play a role in the cytokinin pathway mediated by their repressive function on Arabidopsis response regulators . A recent investigation of GPL4 suggested its involvement in the roots’ response to toxic metals . Thus, although these different members of the GeBP/GPL gene family seem to function in very different aspects of plant development and stress response, their mode of action seems to include a negative regulatory aspect, as observed in our study for the effect of GPLα on senescence and Pi homeostasis.
Our current study suggests a regulatory function for both miR827 and GPLα in Pi homeostasis as well as in senescence, as suggested in the model presented in Fig. 9. Induced expression of miR827 results in reduced expression of NLA which is known to negatively regulate ORE1, thus resulting in accelerated senescence. At the same time, induced miR827 results in decreased GPLα expression, also associated with accelerated senescence. Thus, the function of miR827 for senescence induction could be mediated in parallel by its effects on either NLA or GPLα. Interestingly, a similar parallel function of miR827 is proposed to affect Pi homeostasis via its negative regulatory effect on either NLA or GPLα, both having a negative regulatory effect on PHT1 genes. Thus, miR827 activation enables increased Pi transport due to its effect on increasing PHT1 levels via its effects on both NLA and GPLα. This suggested regulatory circuit involving miR827, GPLα, NLA, and ORE1 could be part of the complex regulatory mechanism of senescence. Many studies support the view that the onset and progression of senescence are highly controlled, to enable efficient recycling of nutrients present in the leaves. Pi is an important nutrient that requires appropriate regulatory and functional components for its recycling, including the functioning of phosphate transporters such as PHT1s to enable export of the nutrient from the senescing tissue. The functions of miR827, NLA, GPLα, ORE1, and PHT1 and the interactions between them could be part of the mechanism controlling the balance between senescence progression, especially in its advanced stage, and recycling and transport of Pi for efficient nutrient recycling, which is the essence of senescence.
Plant growth conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Columbia (Col-0) and Landsberg erecta (Ler) were the wild type plants used. Two GPLα T-DNA insertional lines (ET2099.DS3.07.28.00.B.544, GK-252G05-014573) were ordered from the ABRC stock center. Seeds were germinated on soil or half-strength MS medium following 2 days of vernalization at 4 °C. Plants were grown at 22 °C under a 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle. The complete medium contained the following: 2 mM Ca(NO3)2, 2.5 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 5 mM KNO3, 7 μM H3BO3, 50 μM FeSO4, 50 μM Na-EDTA, 14 μM MnCl2, 0.7 μM ZnSO4, 0.2 mM Na2MoO4, and 50 nM CuSO4. To control Pi levels, KH2PO4 was replaced with K2SO4 [38, 39]. To examine the effects of Pi deficiency, 10-day-old seedlings were transferred to normal or Pi-deficient plates.
For experiments in which senescence was evaluated, either naturally or artificially induced senescing Arabidopsis plants were used. Single plants were grown in potting soil mixture Green 7611 (Green Ltd., http://www.evenari.co.il) in 7 cm × 7 cm × 8 cm containers at 22 °C under a light/dark cycle of 16/8 h (long days). No fertilizer was added. For natural senescence, when initial yellowing tissue, indicative of senescence, was observed in one of the lines examined in a given experiment, leaves 5 and 6 were harvested from multiple plants, pooled, and frozen for further analyses. This usually occurred at about 35–45 days under our growth conditions which are similar to previously described kinetics of natural leaf senescence in Arabidopsis . For artificially induced senescence experiments, Arabidopsis plants were grown as described above, until central stems were initiated. Intact plants were removed from the soil, their roots were excised, and they were placed in the dark, in containers fitted with inlet and outlet ports. The containers were sealed and connected to a flow-through system of air with a flow rate maintained at 50 mL/min, bubbled through sterile water to maintain humidity in the container. Once leaves 5 and 6, in one of the lines, initiated senescence, they were harvested from multiple plants, pooled, and frozen for further experiments.
Vector construction and plant transformation
Full-length pre-miRNA of miR827 (miRBase accession no. MI0005383, TAIR accession no. AT3G59884) and GPLα (TAIR accession no. AT4G00610) were cloned from Arabidopsis. PCR amplification primers were designed by the software Primer Premier 6, and amplified PCR fragments were cloned into the XhoI–XbaI (miR827) or NcoI–XbaI (GPLα) restriction sites of the plant expression vector pFGC5941 (GenBank accession no. AY310901), resulting in vectors pFGC5941-p35S-miR827 and pFGC5941-p35S-GPL, respectively. STTM strategy was used to silence miR827 . The STTM sequence was synthesized (GENEWIZ) and cloned into the pFGC5941 vector restriction sites NcoI–XbaI, resulting in vector pFGC5941-p35S-827STTM. For the GPLα-silencing vector, a segment of the GPLα cDNA sequence was PCR amplified and cloned as two inverted repeats into the restriction sites XhoI–NcoI and XbaI–BamHI of vector pFGC5941, resulting in RNAi vector pFGC5941-p35S-GPL-SI.
Genomic Arabidopsis DNA, including the 1325-bp 5′ sequence of the miR827 promoter or the 2030-bp sequence of GPLα up to ATG, were cloned into restriction sites SalI–NotI, of the pORE R4 vector (ordered from TAIR) , resulting in vector pFGC-5941-p827-GFP and pFGC-5941-pGPL-GFP, respectively. For subcellular localization analysis, GPLα cDNA, including the coding sequences, was cloned upstream or downstream of the GFP cDNA coding sequences to generate either N- or C-terminal translational fusions of GPLα and GFP coding sequences (GPLα–GFP, GFP–GPLα) using the Gateway cloning system (Invitrogen, pDONR/SD/D TOPO and pK7FWG2.0, pK7FWF2.0 vectors). Chimeric genes were cloned under the 35S promoter. All of the primers are listed in Additional file 13: Table S1.
For construction of vectors for transient expression, ath-pre-miR827 and the full-length GPLα cDNA coding sequences were used, as well as those of grape Vvi-miR171d and Vv-SCL15. The predicted miR827 target site in GPLα was mutated at the coding sequence nucleotide positions 792 and 795, replacing T with C (Additional file 3: Figure S3). The pre-miR827 or pre-Vvi-miR171d were cloned into the vector pGreen II-62-SK (Youbio, China), while GPLα or SCL15 coding sequences were cloned into the vector pGreen II-0800-miRNA (Youbio). All cDNAs were cloned under the 35S promoter.
Transformation of Arabidopsis plants was performed by Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip method . Homozygous lines were established and T3 or T4 lines were used for the experiments. Experiments designed to examine the effects of miR827 on GPLα were performed by transient co-expression of the relevant expression vectors following Agrobacterium infiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. The expression vectors were cotransformed with the helper pSoup19 into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 used for tobacco-infiltration experiments. The bacteria were suspended in infiltration medium (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES-KOH, pH 5.2, 0.1 mM acetosyringone) at OD600 = 1, and incubated for 4–5 h at room temperature. The bacterial suspension was injected into the leaves with a syringe. Zones of infiltrated tissues were harvested 4 days after injection for RNA isolation.
Protein and chlorophyll content measurements
Arabidopsis leaf was extracted with 150 μL extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.1% w/v SDS, 10 mM EDTA, and 1 mM PMSF) by crushing in a 2010 Geno Grinder (SPEX Sample Prep). For the chlorophyll assay, 170 μL H2O was added to 30 μL of the extract, followed by vortexing and extraction with 800 μL acetone. Following 10 min centrifugation at maximal speed, the supernatant was used to measure absorbance for quantification of chlorophyll a + b . For protein concentration measurements, the remaining extract was centrifuged at 18,000g at room temperature for 10 min and the clear supernatant was used to measure protein content with a protein assay kit (BioRad).
Total RNA was isolated using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and RNA was reverse-transcribed with the Verso cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific) using gene-specific primers or oligo(dT). The qRT-PCR was performed with a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using Fast SYBR® Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and gene-specific primers (Additional file 13: Table S2). The qRT-PCR primers were designed with Primer Express 3.0 software (Applied Biosystems). Expression data were analyzed by CT (cycle threshold) value [95, 96]. All experiments were carried out with non-template controls and in three biological repeats.
Transient expression in Arabidopsis and confocal microscopy fluorescence observations
Transient expression in Arabidopsis was performed for localization experiments using the vectors harboring the GPLα-GFP and GFP-GPLα translational fusions, as well as the GFP included in the pFGC5941 vector as a control. Vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by the heat-shock transformation method. Agrobacterium leaf infiltration was performed as described previously . Confocal microscopy observation and image acquisition were carried out with an Olympus IX 81 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (FLUOVIEW 500) equipped with a 488-nm argon-ion laser and 60X 1.0 NA Plan Apo water-immersion objective. GFP was excited by 488 nm light and the emission was collected through a BA 515–525 filter; a BA 660 IF emission filter was used to collect chlorophyll autofluorescence. Confocal optical sections were obtained at 0.5-μm increments.
GFP fluorescence imaging of leaves of transgenic plants was performed using the IVIS Lumina II imaging system (PerkinElmer). To measure GFP fluorescence, appropriate filters were used to obtain 430 nm excitation and 530 nm emission. The conditions used for imaging included 12.5 cm field of view for sample, 1.2 lens aperture f/stop, and medium pixel binning (CCD resolution) (to balance pixel size and sensitivity). Acquisition time was 3–5 s. Data capture and analysis were performed using IVIS Lumina II Living Image® Software.
Quantification of total P and soluble Pi
Total P and soluble Pi contents were analyzed as described previously [98, 99] with minor modifications. Total P quantification was performed using leaf tissue dried at 80 °C for 24 h. A 100-mg sample of dry leaf material was dissolved in 2 mL sulfuric acid and digested in a heat block at 250 °C for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, 300 μL H2O2 was added to the solution; the solution was heated to 250 °C for 10 min and then cooled to room temperature. These steps were repeated until the solution was clear. The solution was diluted 50-fold in water and used to measure P concentration. For soluble Pi measurement, fresh tissue was crushed in liquid N and homogenized with 1% glacial acetic acid. Then, 50 μL sample was mixed with 250 μL water and 700 μL assay buffer (600 μL solution of 0.42% w/v NH4MoO4 and 0.86 N H2SO4, 100 μL 10% ascorbic acid) and incubated at 42 °C for 20 min. Pi content was assayed by measuring absorbance at 820 nm.
Sequence data from this article can be found in The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) or the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the following Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (AGI) locus identifiers: miR827 (At3g59884), GPLα (At4g00610), NLA (At1g02860), SPX (At1g63010), SAG12 (At5g45890), BFN1 (At1g11190), PHO1 (At3g23430), PHO2 (At2g33770), PHT1;1 (At5g43350), PHT1;2 (At5g43370), PHT1;3 (At5g43360), PHT1;4 (At2g38940), PHT1;5 (At2g32830), PHT1;6 (At5g43340), PHT1;7 (At3g54700), PHT1;8 (At1g20860), PHT1;9 (At1g76430), PHT2 (At3g26570), PHF1 (At3g52190), AtIPK1 (At5g42810), AtPAP12 (At2g27190), AtPAP26 (At5g34850), ZAT6 (At5g04340), ACTIN (AtT3g18780), and UBC (At5g25760).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
GLABRA1 enhancer-binding protein (GeBP)-like
Nitrogen limitation adaptation
Phosphate transporter 1
- Ler :
Guo Y, Gan S. Leaf senescence: signals, execution, and regulation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;71:83–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(05)71003-6.
Thomas H, Ougham HJ, Wagstaff C, Stead AD. Defining senescence and death. J Exp Bot. 2003;54(385):1127–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg133.
Woo HR, Kim HJ, Lim PO, Nam HG. Leaf senescence: systems and dynamics aspects. In: Merchant SS, editor. Annual Review of Plant Biology, Vol 70; 2019. p. 347–76.
Hörtensteiner S. Chlorophyll degradation during senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57(1):55–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105212.
Thomas H. Senescence, ageing and death of the whole plant. New Phytol. 2013;197(3):696–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12047.
Kim J, Kim JH, Lyu JI, Woo HR, Lim PO. New insights into the regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(4):787–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx287.
Thomas H, Huang L, Young M, Ougham H. Evolution of plant senescence. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9(1):163. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-163.
Lers A. Environmental regulation of leaf senescence. In: Gan S, editor. Senescence Processes in Plants. Oxford: blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 108–33.
Sade N, Rubio-Wilhelmi MD, Umnajkitikorn K, Blumwald E. Stress-induced senescence and plant tolerance to abiotic stress. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(4):845–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx235.
Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Li YC. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J Plant Nutr. 2008;31(6):1121–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160802116068.
Diaz C, Lemaître T, Christ A, Azzopardi M, Kato Y, Sato F, Morot-Gaudry JF, le Dily F, Masclaux-Daubresse C. Nitrogen recycling and remobilization are differentially controlled by leaf senescence and development stage in Arabidopsis under low nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(3):1437–49. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.119040.
Fischer AM. Nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence. Annual Plant Reviews Volume 26: Senescence Processes in Plants. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007. p. 87–107.
Gregersen PL, Holm PB, Krupinska K. Leaf senescence and nutrient remobilisation in barley and wheat. Plant Biol. 2008;10:37–49.
Himelblau E, Amasino RM. Nutrients mobilized from leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana during leaf senescence. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158(10):1317–23. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00608.
Hörtensteiner S, Feller U. Nitrogen metabolism and remobilization during senescence. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(370):927–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.370.927.
Liu J, Wu YH, Yan JJ, Liu YD, Shen FF. Protein degradation and nitrogen remobilization during leaf senescence. J Plant Biol. 2008;51(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030735.
Guiboileau A, Sormani R, Meyer C, Masclaux-Daubresse C. Senescence and death of plant organs: nutrient recycling and developmental regulation. C R Biol. 2010;333(4):382–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.01.016.
Avice J-C, Etienne P. Leaf senescence and nitrogen remobilization efficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Exp Bot. 2014;65(14):3813–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru177.
Maillard A, Diquelou S, Billard V, Laine P, Garnica M, Prudent M, et al. Leaf mineral nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence and modulation by nutrient deficiency. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00317.
Leopold AC. Senescence in Plant Development: The death of plants or plant parts may be of positive ecological or physiological value. Science. 1961;134:1727–32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3492.1727.
Balazadeh S, Riano-Pachon DM, Mueller-Roeber B. Transcription factors regulating leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 2008;10:63–75.
Breeze E, Harrison E, McHattie S, Hughes L, Hickman R, Hill C, Kiddle S, Kim YS, Penfold CA, Jenkins D, Zhang C, Morris K, Jenner C, Jackson S, Thomas B, Tabrett A, Legaie R, Moore JD, Wild DL, Ott S, Rand D, Beynon J, Denby K, Mead A, Buchanan-Wollaston V. High-resolution temporal profiling of transcripts during Arabidopsis leaf senescence reveals a distinct chronology of processes and regulation. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):873–94. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083345.
Wagstaff C, Yang TJW, Stead AD, Buchanan-Wollaston V, Roberts JA. A molecular and structural characterization of senescing Arabidopsis siliques and comparison of transcriptional profiles with senescing petals and leaves. Plant J. 2009;57(4):690–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03722.x.
Kim HJ, Nam HG, Lim PO. Regulatory network of NAC transcription factors in leaf senescence. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016;33:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.002.
Schippers JHM. Transcriptional networks in leaf senescence. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;27:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.018.
Hanfrey C, Fife M, BuchananWollaston V. Leaf senescence in Brassica napus: expression of genes encoding pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;30(3):597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049334.
Noh YS, Amasino RM. Identification of a promoter region responsible for the senescence-specific expression of SAG12. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;41(2):181–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006342412688.
Oh SA, Lee SY, Chung IK, Lee CH, Nam HG. A senescence-associated gene of Arabidopsis thaliana is distinctively regulated during natural and artificially induced leaf senescence. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;30(4):739–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019008.
Chen W, Provart NJ, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F, Chang H-S, Eulgem T, Mauch F, Luan S, Zou G, Whitham SA, Budworth PR, Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen X, Lam S, Kreps JA, Harper JF, Si-Ammour A, Mauch-Mani B, Heinlein M, Kobayashi K, Hohn T, Dangl JL, Wang X, Zhu T. Expression profile matrix of arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell. 2002;14(3):559–74. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010410.
Swida-Barteczka A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z. Micromanagement of developmental and stress-induced senescence: the emerging role of microRNAs. Genes. 2019;10(3):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030210.
Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Jarmolowski A. Post-transcriptional regulation of microRNA accumulation and function: new insights from plants. Mol Plant. 2018;11(8):1006–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.06.010.
Kim JH, Woo HR, Kim J, Lim PO, Lee IC, Choi SH, Hwang D, Nam HG. Trifurcate feed-forward regulation of age-dependent cell death involving miR164 in Arabidopsis. Science. 2009;323(5917):1053–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166386.
Schommer C, Palatnik JF, Aggarwal P, Chetelat A, Cubas P, Farmer EE, et al. Control of jasmonate biosynthesis and senescence by miR319 targets. Plos Biol. 2008;6(9):1991–2001.
Huo XY, Wang C, Teng YB, Liu XY. Identification of miRNAs associated with dark-induced senescence in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15(1):266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0656-5.
Woo HR, Koo HJ, Kim J, Jeong H, Yang JO, Lee IH, Jun JH, Choi SH, Park SJ, Kang B, Kim YW, Phee BK, Kim JH, Seo C, Park C, Kim SC, Park S, Lee B, Lee S, Hwang D, Nam HG, Lim PO. Programming of plant leaf senescence with temporal and inter-organellar coordination of transcriptome in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(1):452–67. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01929.
Xu XB, Bai HQ, Liu CP, Chen EY, Chen QG, Zhuang JY, et al. Genome-wide analysis of microRNAs and their target genes related to leaf senescence of rice. Plos One. 2014;9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114313.
Thatcher SR, Burd S, Wright C, Lers A, Green PJ. Differential expression of miRNAs and their target genes in senescing leaves and siliques: insights from deep sequencing of small RNAs and cleaved target RNAs. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38(1):188–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12393.
Kant S, Peng MS, Rothstein SJ. Genetic regulation by NLA and microRNA827 for maintaining nitrate-dependent phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plos Genet. 2011;7(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002021.
Lin WY, Huang TK, Chiou TJ. Nitrogen limitation adaptation, a target of microRNA827, mediates degradation of plasma membrane-localized phosphate transporters to maintain phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):4061–74. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.116012.
Liu TY, Lin WY, Huang TK, Chiou TJ. MicroRNA-mediated surveillance of phosphate transporters on the move. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(10):647–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.004.
Nguyen GN, Rothstein SJ, Spangenberg G, Kant S. Role of microRNAs involved in plant response to nitrogen and phosphorous limiting conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00629.
Hsieh LC, Lin SI, Shih ACC, Chen JW, Lin WY, Tseng CY, Li WH, Chiou TJ. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(4):2120–32. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.147280.
Liang G, Ai Q, Yu DQ. Uncovering miRNAs involved in crosstalk between nutrient deficiencies in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11813.
Zhang ZL, Liao H, Lucas WJ. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56(3):192–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12163.
Baker A, Ceasar SA, Palmer AJ, Paterson JB, Qi WJ, Muench SP, Baldwin SA. Replace, reuse, recycle: improving the sustainable use of phosphorus by plants. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(12):3523–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv210.
Smith AP, Fontenot EB, Zahraeifard S, DiTusa SF. Molecular components that drive phosphorus-remobilisation during leaf senescence. Annual Plant Rev. 2015;48:159–86.
Stigter KA, Plaxton WC. Molecular mechanisms of phosphorus metabolism and transport during leaf senescence. Plants. 2015;4(4):773–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants4040773.
Aerts R. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol. 1996;84(4):597–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261481.
Bouain N, Shahzad Z, Rouached A, Khan GA, Berthomieu P, Abdelly C, Poirier Y, Rouached H. Phosphate and zinc transport and signalling in plants: toward a better understanding of their homeostasis interaction. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(20):5725–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru314.
Nagarajan VK, Jain A, Poling MD, Lewis AJ, Raghothama KG, Smith AP. Arabidopsis Pht1;5 mobilizes phosphate between source and sink organs and influences the interaction between phosphate homeostasis and ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(3):1149–63. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.174805.
Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, et al. Phosphate import in plants: focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00083.
Hassler S, Jung B, Lemke L, Novak O, Strnad M, Martinoia E, et al. Function of the golgi-located phosphate transporter PHT4;6 is critical for senescence-associated processes in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(15):4671–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw249.
Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Cumbie JS, Givan SA, Law TF, Grant SR, Dangl JL, Carrington JC. High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis microRNAs: evidence for frequent birth and death of miRNA genes. PLoS One. 2007;2(2):e219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000219.
Liu J, Yang L, Luan M, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang B, Shi J, Zhao FG, Lan W, Luan S. A vacuolar phosphate transporter essential for phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA. 2015;112(47):E6571–E8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514598112.
Liu TY, Huang TK, Yang SY, Hong YT, Huang SM, Wang FN, et al. Identification of plant vacuolar transporters mediating phosphate storage. Nature Comm. 2016;7:11095. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11095.
Dai X, Zhao PX. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(suppl_2):W155–W9.
Sun X, Xie ZQ, Zhang C, Mu Q, Wu WM, Wang BJ, Fang J. A characterization of grapevine of GRAS domain transcription factor gene family. Funct Integr Genomic. 2016;16(4):347–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-016-0479-y.
Perez-Amador MA, Abler ML, De Rocher EJ, Thompson DM, van Hoof A, LeBrasseur ND, et al. Identification of BFN1, a bifunctional nuclease induced during leaf and stem senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(1):169–79. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.1.169.
Pontier D, Gan SS, Amasino RM, Roby D, Lam E. Markers for hypersensitive response and senescence show distinct patterns of expression. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;39(6):1243–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006133311402.
Waese J, Fan J, Pasha A, Yu H, Fucile G, Shi R, Cumming M, Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ, Krishnakumar V, Ferlanti E, Miller J, Town C, Stuerzlinger W, Provart NJ. ePlant: visualizing and exploring multiple levels of data for hypothesis generation in plant biology. Plant Cell. 2017;29(8):1806–21. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00073.
Kaundal R, Saini R, Zhao PX. Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(1):36–54. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.156851.
Lopez-Bucio J, Hernandez-Abreu E, Sanchez-Calderon L, Nieto-Jacobo MF, Simpson J, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(1):244–56. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010934.
Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramirez A, Herrera-Estrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6(3):280–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00035-9.
Gu MA, Chen AQ, Sun SB, Xu GH. Complex regulation of plant phosphate transporters and the gap between molecular mechanisms and practical application: what is missing? Molec Plant. 2016;9(3):396–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.012.
Wege S, Khan GA, Jung JY, Vogiatzaki E, Pradervand S, Aller I, Meyer AJ, Poirier Y. The EXS domain of PHO1 participates in the response of shoots to phosphate deficiency via a root-to-shoot signal. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(1):385–400. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00975.
Mudge SR, Rae AL, Diatloff E, Smith FW. Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the PHT1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;31(3):341–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01356.x.
Ma C, Burd S, Lers A. miR408 is involved in abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015;84(1):169–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12999.
Pant BD, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, May P, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Walther D, Scheible WR. Identification of nutrient-responsive arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009;150(3):1541–55. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.139139.
Lin S-I, Santi C, Jobet E, Lacut E, El Kholti N, Karlowski WM, et al. Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51(12):2119–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq170.
Chevalier F, Perazza D, Laporte F, Le Henaff G, Hornitschek P, Bonneville JM, et al. GeBP and GeBP-like proteins are noncanonical leucine-zipper transcription factors that regulate cytokinin response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(3):1142–54. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.110270.
Curaba J, Herzog M, Vachon G. GeBP, the first member of a new gene family in Arabidopsis, encodes a nuclear protein with DNA-binding activity and is regulated by KNAT1. Plant J. 2003;33(2):305–17. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01622.x.
Khare D, Mitsuda N, Lee S, Song WY, Hwang D, Ohme-Takagi M, Martinoia E, Lee Y, Hwang JU. Root avoidance of toxic metals requires the GeBP-LIKE 4 transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2017;213(3):1257–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14242.
Perazza D, Laporte F, Balague C, Chevalier F, Remo S, Bourge M, et al. GeBP/GPL transcription factors regulate a subset of CPR5-dependent processes. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(3):1232–42. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.179804.
Farage-Barhom S, Burd S, Sonego L, Mett A, Belausov E, Gidoni D, Lers A. Localization of the Arabidopsis senescence- and cell death-associated BFN1 nuclease: from the ER to fragmented nuclei. Mol Plant. 2011;4(6):1062–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssr045.
Farage-Barhom S, Burd S, Sonego L, Perl-Treves R, Lers A. Expression analysis of the BFN1 nuclease gene promoter during senescence, abscission, and programmed cell death-related processes. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(12):3247–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern176.
James M, Masclaux-Daubresse C, Marmagne A, Azzopardi M, Laine P, Goux D, et al. A new role for SAG12 cysteine protease in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci. 2019;9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01998.
Alves L, Niemeier S, Hauenschild A, Rehmsmeier M, Merkle T. Comprehensive prediction of novel microRNA targets in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(12):4010–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp272.
Allen E, Xie ZX, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121(2):207–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004.
Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP. MicroRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(26):9412–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503927102.
Peng MS, Hannam C, Gu HL, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ. A mutation in NLA, which encodes a RING-type ubiquitin ligase, disrupts the adaptability of Arabidopsis to nitrogen limitation. Plant J. 2007;50(2):320–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03050.x.
Park BS, Yao T, Seo JS, Wong ECC, Mitsuda N, Huang CH, Chua NH. Arabidopsis nitrogen limitation adaptation regulates ORE1 homeostasis during senescence induced by nitrogen deficiency. Nat Plants. 2018;4(11):898–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0269-8.
Matallana-Ramirez LP, Rauf M, Farage-Barhom S, Dortay H, Xue GP, Droge-Laser W, et al. NAC transcription factor ORE1 and senescence-induced bifunctional nuclease1 (BFN1) constitute a regulatory cascade in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2013;6(5):1438–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst012.
Oh SA, Park JH, Lee GI, Paek KH, Park SK, Nam HG. Identification of three genetic loci controlling leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1997;12(3):527–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0960-7412.1997.00527.x.
Hammond JP, Bennett MJ, Bowen HC, Broadley MR, Eastwood DC, May ST, Rahn C, Swarup R, Woolaway KE, White PJ. Changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis shoots during phosphate starvation and the potential for developing smart plants. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(2):578–96. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.020941.
Linkohr BI, Williamson LC, Fitter AH, Leyser HMO. Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;29(6):751–60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01251.x.
Peret B, Desnos T, Jost R, Kanno S, Berkowitz O, Nussaume L. Root architecture responses: in search of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(4):1713–23. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.244541.
Chien PS, Chiang CB, Wang ZR, Chiou TJ. MicroRNA-mediated signaling and regulation of nutrient transport and utilization. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;39:73–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.007.
Park BS, Seo JS, Chua NH. NITROGEN LIMITATION ADAPTATION recruits PHOSPHATE2 to target the phosphate transporter PT2 for degradation during the regulation of Arabidopsis phosphate homeostasis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(1):454–64. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.120311.
Wang DLY, Lv SL, Jiang P, Li YX. Roles, regulation, and agricultural application of plant phosphate transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00817.
Devaiah BN, Madhuvanthi R, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG. Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2009;2(1):43–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn081.
Yan J, Gu Y, Jia X, Kang W, Pan S, Tang X, Chen X, Tang G. Effective small RNA destruction by the expression of a short tandem target mimic in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(2):415–27. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.094144.
Coutu C, Brandle J, Brown D, Brown K, Miki B, Simmonds J, Hegedus DD. pORE: a modular binary vector series suited for both monocot and dicot plant transformation. Transgenic Res. 2007;16(6):771–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-007-9066-2.
Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x.
Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous-equations for assaying chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b extracted with 4 different solvents - verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic-absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;975(3):384–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0.
Chen CF, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou ZH, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, Lao KQ, Livak KJ, Guegler KJ. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(20):e179. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gni178.
Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR. MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 2008;53(5):731–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x.
Ma C, Lu Y, Bai SL, Zhang WN, Duan XW, Meng D, Wang Z, Wang A, Zhou Z, Li T. Cloning and characterization of miRNAs and their targets, including a novel miRNA-targeted NBS-LRR protein class gene in apple (Golden Delicious). Mol Plant. 2014;7(1):218–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst101.
Ames BN. Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Methods Enzymol. 1966;8:115–8.
Hurley BA, Tran HT, Marty NJ, Park J, Snedden WA, Mullen RT, Plaxton WC. The dual-targeted purple acid phosphatase isozyme AtPAP26 is essential for efficient acclimation of Arabidopsis to nutritional phosphate deprivation. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(3):1112–22.
C.M. was a recipient of the ARO (Agricultural Research Organization)–Israel Postdoctoral Fellowship. We are very grateful to Sarit Vilenchik for her technical assistance in some aspects of this research.
This research was supported by grant no. IS-4180-08 from BARD, the United States–Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund to A.L.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Expression of pre-miR827 is induced during natural and dark-induced leaf senescence and is regulated by upstream sequences. A and C Expression of pre-miR827 during natural senescence (A) and artificial dark-induced senescence (C) was measured by qRT-PCR in young (Y), mature (M), early senescence (ES) and late senescence (LS) leaves, and in late-stage dark-induced senescence (DIS). Different letters and asterisk indicate significant difference (P < 0.05, Student’s t test, ±SD). B and D GFP fluorescence measured in leaves of transgenic plants containing miR827-promoter-driven GFP (miR827Pro:GFP) during natural senescence (B) or dark-induced senescence (D). Six independent transgenic lines were examined and representative lines are shown. WT, wild type.
Vector constructs and effects of genetic manipulations of pre-miR827 expression level on transgenic plants. A Upper map: transformation vector constructed for overexpression of miR827. The precursor of miR827 is regulated by the constitutive 35S promoter. Lower map: transformation vector constructed for silencing of miR827 using a target mimic method (STTM) to silence miR827 activated constitutively by control of the 35S promoter. Construction details are described in Methods. B Expression levels of pre-miR827 in two independent transgenic lines overexpressing miR827 (35S:827-OE1, 2), the wild type [WT (Col)], and two independent miR827-silenced lines (35S:827-STTM1, 2). Expression was measured by qRT-PCR and represents the mean of three biological repeats; values were normalized to WT levels. Asterisk indicates significant difference from WT (P < 0.05, Student’s t test, ±SD).
Predicted miR827-recognition site in the GPLα sequence. Upper row, sequence of GPLα transcript from nucleotides 778–825. Sequence identified as putative target for miR827 is labeled in red and the extent of base-pairing to the miR827 sequence shown in the lower row is presented. Two U positions changed to C in the mutant version of GPLα are shown in blue above the recognition site. Cleavage-site position experimentally identified by 5′ RACE analysis for 5 out of 13 incidences examined is indicated by a vertical arrow. Another 8 sites were spread among 5 additional locations in the 100-bp region downstream of the putative recognition site.
Senescence-associated expression of GPLα is altered in transgenic plants with modified miR827 expression. Expression levels of GPLα, SAG12 and BFN1 were measured by qRT-PCR in leaves of miR827-overexpressing (miR827–OE1), wild-type (WT) (Col-0) and miR827-silenced (miR827–STTM1) lines at different senescence stages. Relative abundance of the transcripts of the three genes was plotted against chlorophyll content, representing senescence stage. Three independent transgenic lines were examined. Error bars correspond to ± SD. FW, fresh weight.
Expression of GPLα is induced during natural and dark-induced leaf senescence and is regulated by upstream sequences. A and C Expression of GPLα during natural senescence (A) and artificial dark-induced senescence (C) was measured using qRT-PCR in young (Y), mature (M), early senescence (ES), and late senescence (LS) leaves, and in late dark-induced senescence (DIS). Different letters and asterisk indicate significant difference (P < 0.05, Student’s t test, ±SD). B and D GFP fluorescence measured in leaves of transgenic plants containing GPLα-promoter-driven GFP (GPLαPro:GFP) during natural senescence (B) or dark-induced senescence (D). Three independent transgenic lines were examined and representative lines are shown. WT, wild type.
Vector constructs and effects of genetic manipulations of GPLα expression level on transgenic plants. A Upper map: transformation vector constructed for overexpression of GPLα. Full-length GPLα coding sequence was cloned and regulated by the constitutive 35S promoter. Middle panel: map of the constructed transformation vector for silencing GPLα. The RNAi gene constructed to silence GPLα was regulated by the constitutive 35S promoter. Construction details are described in Methods. Lower map: genomic sites of T-DNA insertions for the two independent GPLα-mutant lines—ET2099.Ds3.07.28.00.b.544 (GPLα–KO1) and GK-252G05–014573 (GPLα–KO2). B–D Expression levels of GPLα in transgenic plants overexpressing GPLα (GPLα OE1, 2), or with silenced GPLα (GPLα SI1, 2), and in the wild type [WT (Col)] (B), and in transgenic plants GPLα OE3, 4, GPLα SI3, 4, and WT (Ler) (C). Expression levels of GPLα in the GPLα mutants in the two ecotypes (GPLα KO1 in Col-0, GPLα KO2 in Ler) (D). Expression was measured by qRT-PCR and represents the mean of three biological repeats. Asterisk indicates significant difference from WT (P < 0.05, Student’s t test, ±SD).
Altered expression of GPLα in transgenic plants results in modified progression of leaf senescence. A and D Inhibited senescence in transgenic plants (Ler background) overexpressing GPLα (GPLα OE3) during natural leaf senescence (A, left panel) and artificial dark-induced senescence (D, left panel). Accelerated senescence in GPLα-silenced transgenic plants (GPLα SI3) during natural leaf senescence (A, middle panel) and artificial dark-induced senescence (D, middle panel). Accelerated senescence in GPLα-mutant plants (GPLα KO2) during natural leaf senescence (A, right panel) and artificial dark-induced senescence (D, right panel). WT (Ler), wild-type Ler accession. B and C Effects of GPLα overexpression or suppression on total chlorophyll (B) or protein (C) contents during natural leaf senescence. E and F Effects of overexpression or suppression of GPLα expression on total chlorophyll (E) and protein (F) contents during dark-induced leaf senescence. Three independent transgenic lines were examined. Asterisks indicate significant differences within each compared pair (P < 0.05, Student’s t test, ±SD).
Induction of pre-miR827, GPLα and PHT1 expression following exposure to Pi-deficient growth conditions. A and B Wild-type (Col-0) seedlings (10 days old) were transferred to Pi-deficient medium and expression was measured simultaneously in leaves (A) and roots (B) at different times after transfer. The primers used to measure PHT1 gene expression enabled the measurement of the total transcript of a few different members of the PHT1 gene family. The primers (Table S2) fully matched PHT1;1 and PHT1;2 and likely recognized a few additional PHT1 members with some mismatches in the primer sequences. Error bars indicate ±SD.
GPLα-GFP is localized to the nuclei. Leaves were transiently transformed with a vector including a translational fusion between GPLα and GFP, 35S:GFP::GPLα. GFP protein localization was visualized using confocal microscopy. (a) GFP fluorescence; (b) DAPI nuclei staining dye fluorescence; (c) bright-field image; (d) overlay of a, b, and c.
Measured root length for the mutant line GPLα–KO2 in which GPLα was overexpressed [GPLα–OE (GPLα–KO2)]. The mutant line GPLα–KO2 (Ler background) was transformed for overexpression of GPLα and the consequences for root length following exposure to growth under Pi deficiency were examined in three independent transgenic lines. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, ±SD). WT, wild type.
Expression of PHT1 and PHO1 is induced under Pi-deficient conditions. Expression of PHT1 (A) and PHO1 (B) was measured in both Col-0 (Col MS) and Ler (Ler MS) wild-type accessions following transfer of seedlings to Pi-deficient growth conditions for 7 days (Col MS-Pi and Ler MS-Pi, respectively). Expression was measured by qRT-PCR and represents the mean of three biological repeats. Asterisks indicate significant difference (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test, ±SD). The primers used to measure PHT1 expression were as described for Additional file 8.
Expression analysis of Pi-deficiency-responsive genes in GPLα-overexpressing lines. Expression was measured by qRT-PCR and represents the mean of three biological repeats. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, ±SD). WT, wild type.
Sequences of primers used in gene cloning and vector construction. Table S2. Primers used for qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, C., Chen, Q., Wang, S. et al. Downregulation of GeBP-like α factor by MiR827 suggests their involvement in senescence and phosphate homeostasis. BMC Biol 19, 90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01015-2
- Arabidopsis thaliana
- Phosphate homeostasis