- Research article
- Open Access
The Arabidopsis AtRaptor genes are essential for post-embryonic plant growth
© Anderson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 23 January 2005
- Accepted: 21 April 2005
- Published: 21 April 2005
Flowering plant development is wholly reliant on growth from meristems, which contain totipotent cells that give rise to all post-embryonic organs in the plant. Plants are uniquely able to alter their development throughout their lifespan through the generation of new organs in response to external signals. To identify genes that regulate meristem-based growth, we considered homologues of Raptor proteins, which regulate cell growth in response to nutrients in yeast and metazoans as part of a signaling complex with the target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase.
We identified AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B, two loci predicted to encode Raptor proteins in Arabidopsis. Disruption of AtRaptor1B yields plants with a wide range of developmental defects: roots are thick and grow slowly, leaf initiation and bolting are delayed and the shoot inflorescence shows reduced apical dominance. AtRaptor1A AtRaptor1B double mutants show normal embryonic development but are unable to maintain post-embryonic meristem-driven growth. AtRaptor transcripts accumulate in dividing and expanding cells and tissues.
The data implicate the TOR signaling pathway, a major regulator of cell growth in yeast and metazoans, in the maintenance of growth from the shoot apical meristem in plants. These results provide insights into the ways in which TOR/Raptor signaling has been adapted to regulate plant growth and development, and indicate that in plants, as in other eukaryotes, there is some Raptor-independent TOR activity.
- Shoot Apex
- Shoot Apical Meristem
- Axillary Meristem
- Leaf Initiation
- Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory
Plant development is remarkably plastic. Groups of totipotent cells termed meristems, which are maintained throughout the life of the plant, give rise to all post-embryonic organs from roots and leaves to petals and fruit. This allows plants, unlike metazoans, to change their final body plans dramatically in response to environmental, hormonal and nutritional cues. While much has been learned about the determination of cell fates in the embryo  and the apical meristems [2–4], less is known about the genes that control the growth that occurs in cells emerging from the plant meristem.
TOR proteins were originally identified in budding yeast as the targets of rapamycin, a potent antibiotic that disrupts cell growth [5, 6]. In both yeast and metazoans, TOR proteins mediate translation in response to nutrients . Yeast TOR2 and mammalian mTOR also regulate cytoskeletal organization [8–13].
In both yeast and mammalian cells, TOR proteins form a complex, TORC1, with GβL  and Raptor (regulatory associated protein of TOR) [15–17]; their yeast homologues are LST8 and KOG1, respectively . Raptor contains protein-binding domains, and the Raptor N-terminus shows similarity to a caspase domain , though catalytic activity has yet to be shown. It has been reported that the strength of the TOR-Raptor interaction is regulated by nutrients, though there is not yet consensus on this point [15–17]. Raptor functions in TORC1 to recruit substrates for phosphorylation by TOR; Raptor binds TOR substrates S6kinase and eIF4E-BP, and is necessary for full TOR phosphorylation of these substrates in vitro [16, 19]. The TOR-Raptor complex is thought to mediate the nutrient-sensitive regulation of cell growth; mutants in yeast lacking a functional complex cease cell growth in a manner that mimics rapamycin treatment . A second TOR complex, TORC2, involves GβL, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion to TOR) and perhaps other proteins [13, 17, 20]. This complex is unaffected by rapamycin, and is thought to mediate TOR cytoskeletal regulation.
In Arabidopsis the single TOR homologue, AtTOR, is critical for plant development [21, 22]. AtTOR insertion homozygote embryos undergo cell division but are unable to gain cell volume or undergo apical-basal differentiation. Although AtTOR transcripts accumulate in all tissues assayed , an AtTOR-Gus fusion transcript is only translated in meristematic tissue and the immediately adjacent expanding cells . A TOR-specific microRNA conserved between Arabidopsis and rice  implicates post-transcriptional regulation in AtTOR expression. Rapamycin perturbs the activity of the nutrient-sensitive TOR complex in yeast and mammals. Arabidopsis, however, is insensitive to rapamycin,  precluding this approach to the elucidation of Arabidopsis TOR signaling.
Here we report a characterization of AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B, which encode the two Arabidopsis Raptor homologues. We found defects in both root and shoot growth in AtRaptor1B disruption lines, resulting in slow leaf initiation, late flowering and increased branching. We also found that AtRaptor1A AtRaptor1B double mutant homozygotes undergo normal seedling development, but exhibit only minimal post-embryonic meristem activity. We contrast these results with those found previously for the AtTOR mutant, and discuss the implications of this work for TOR signaling in plants.
Characterization of the Arabidopsis Raptor homologues
To search for plant homologues of mammalian Raptor, we surveyed the completed Arabidopsis genome and found two loci that might encode proteins highly similar to Raptor at the north ends of chromosomes 3 and 5. We did not find an expressed sequence tag (EST) for the first locus (AtRaptor1A; At5g01770). However, we used the 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) to establish that the locus is transcribed to an mRNA with a 5' end consistent with the predicted open reading frame (ORF) of AtRaptor1A. The AtRaptor1A protein is predicted to be 1,346 amino acids in length. The second locus (AtRaptor1B; At3g08850) was represented by a single EST (accession no. AY769948). We used 5' RACE to confirm that the EST contained the full ORF of AtRaptor1B. The AtRaptor1B locus is transcribed to a 4.8 kb mRNA containing 23 exons, and the protein is predicted to be 1,344 amino acids in length. Predicted AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B proteins show 80% identity over their entirety.
Identification of knockout mutants in AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B
1B-/- seedling roots grow slowly
The roots of 1B-/- seedlings grown on 90° inclined plates were morphologically wild type but shorter than Col roots. When the plates were rotated to lay flat horizontally, new growth from the root apex of 1B-/- seedlings produced thick, coiled roots (though the roots were not densely covered in hairs), while the previously produced root tissue remained morphologically wild type (Fig. 3C). Only those sections of the root not in contact with the medium were hairy (Fig. 3A). Thus the root growth disturbance was a defect in growth into agar rather than in gravitropism, though in the absence of resistance, roots still grew more slowly than wild type.
Col and 1B-/- root apical meristems (RAM) were examined using bright-field microscopy (Fig. 3I). 1B-/- seedling RAMs contained all cell types present in Col RAMs but their root morphology was much more blunt; this difference appeared to be localized to the 1B-/- zone of elongation. 1B-/- root tips showed a tendency to shed their root caps, although shedding was sometimes observed in Col root tips as well.
1B-/- shoots show developmental and morphological defects
To quantify this phenotype, Col and 1B-/- lines were grown to maturity in 16-hr days, and shoot architecture for an individual plant was scored at the shattering of the first silique. 1B-/- plants showed reduced shoot height, reduced primary stem length, increased axillary branch number and an increased number of secondary shoots compared to Col and 1A-/- plants (Fig. 5B, E). 1B-/- branch numbers, though variable, were significantly larger than those of wild type or 1A-/-. Student's t-Tests of sample pairs assuming equal variance yielded P-values of 0.0027 and 0.0004 for 1B-/- vs. Col and 1B-/- vs. 1A-/- axillary branch number, respectively, and 0.0026 and 0.0013 for 1B-/- vs. Col and 1B-/- vs. 1A-/- secondary shoot number. Axillary branch length did not differ significantly from Col values (Fig. 5F). This phenotype became more pronounced later in plant development and was more conspicuous under short days.
Complementation of the AtRaptor1B-/- phenotype
To confirm that the collection of phenotypes observed in the AtRaptor1B-/- homozygotes was due to the mutant 1B allele, 1B-/- plants were transformed with a construct containing the AtRaptor1B ORF and 5' UTR and driven by the AtRaptor1B promoter. Some of these transformants showed wild-type transition to bolting, shoot branching and root growth (data not shown). We conclude that the 1B-/- phenotypes described above result from homozygosity for the lesion at the AtRaptor1B locus.
AtRaptortranscripts accumulate in dividing and expanding cell tissues
To obtain an estimate of the relative levels of AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B in the signal seen in Fig. 6A, AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B locus IDs were used to query the Genevestigator Arabidopsis thaliana Microarray Database and Analysis Toolbox . AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B accumulate in all developmental stages (Fig. 6C). However, AtRaptor1B accumulation levels are consistently fourfold higher than those of AtRaptor1A. A second analysis of accumulation by tissue rather than developmental stage produced similar results. We conclude that AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B show similar expression patterns.
1A-/- 1B-/- double homozygote mutant seedlings show minimal meristem growth
We examined 1A-/- 1B-/- double mutant seedling roots via bright field microscopy to ascertain the extent of their post-embryonic growth defect. 1A-/- 1B-/- roots were conspicuously narrower than wild type. The columella, quiescent center, vasculature, pericycle, endodermis and cortex are present though all smaller than wild type; the outer layer of cells is difficult to identify. Further up the root, root hairs were clearly visible, indicating that the RAM had produced some mature root cell types (Fig. 7D, E).
To gain a better understanding of the double mutant shoot apical meristem (SAM) defect, Col and 1A-/- 1B-/- 7-day seedlings were fixed and coated, and their shoot apexes were observed with a scanning electron microscope. In Col seedlings, leaves 1 and 2, with trichomes, were clearly visible; primordia for leaves 3, 4 and 5 were visible under higher magnification. 1A-/- 1B-/- shoot apexes showed minimal SAM activity: leaves 1 and 2 were produced, but were smaller than wild type and did not separate to reveal any further leaf primordia (Fig. 7F, G, H, I).
In order to determine whether a plant hormone or signaling molecule could restore post-embryonic growth to these arrested seedlings, progeny of 1A-/- 1B+/- individuals were germinated on plates containing a variety of plant hormones and signaling molecules and scored for their total seedling lengths at 10 days post germination. Signaling molecules tested included the gibberellin GA3 (100 nM to 10 μM), abscisic acid (100 nM to 10 μM), the auxin 2,4-D (1 nM to 10 μM), the ethylene precursor ACC (1 μM and 10 μM), sucrose (1%) and glucose (6%). We also attempted dark treatment. None of these treatments restored wild-type SAM growth to the quarter of the progeny showing seedling arrest. 1A-/- 1B-/- seedlings did show a significant response to sucrose (Fig. 7B, C). Addition of 1% sucrose, which is a growth signaling factor as well as a carbon source , to the growth medium promoted growth in Col, 1A-/-, 1B-/- and 1A-/- 1B-/-. In sibling seedlings, the addition of sucrose elicited a twofold increase in seedling length; in the double mutants the increase was five-fold. Germination on 6% sucrose, which signals growth arrest in Col plants , yielded sibling plants 1–1.5× the size of seedlings grown on 1/2 Murashige & Skoog (MS) salts with no sucrose added. 1A-/- 1B-/- seedlings on 6% sucrose were 2.3× the length of those grown on 1/2 MS salts. A similar result was observed among 1A-/- 1B+/- progeny germinated in the dark on 1/2 MS salts plates, and the length of 1A-/- 1B-/- seedlings was increased more than 3× under these conditions. The absolute length of the double mutant seedlings was in all cases still substantially smaller that that of sibling seedlings for a given treatment, and the increase in length was largely due to hypocotyl elongation or root growth. Minimal SAM activity was observed.
Axillary branch growth in Arabidopsis and other vascular plants is governed indirectly by auxin produced at the primary shoot apex, which acts through an undetermined secondary messenger to repress axillary meristem growth . The shoot morphology of 1B-/- plants indicates a defect in primary SAM maintenance. The primary shoot is shorter than wild type and ends in a whorl of sterile flowers. The number and length of axillary shoots, both cauline and emerging from the basal rosette, is significantly increased. Notably, axillary meristems are quite viable, producing branches as long as or longer than wild type. The viability of axillary shoot apices points to a failure to maintain primary SAM activity, and a subsequent failure to repress axillary meristem activity. This defect is not shared by the axillary SAMs, which match or surpass the activity of their wild-type counterparts. A similar phenomenon is seen in erecta mutants  and may be quite common. The increased branching in AtRaptor1B mutant plants may result directly from reduced auxin production at the shoot apex or from a change in the auxin/cytokinin ratio. However, 1B-/- mutants did not show defects in their ability to sense exogenous auxin (data not shown).
The endogenous AtRaptor1A locus cannot fully complement the disruption of AtRaptor1B despite the fact that their predicted proteins are 80% identical, share all conserved Raptor motifs and strongly resolve to a single clade in phylogenetic analysis. In silico analysis suggests that the failure of AtRaptor1A to mask AtRaptor1B lesions may be due to lower levels of AtRaptor1A expression globally rather than limited tissue-specific accumulation of AtRaptor1A. We did not assay for the complementation of AtRaptor1B lesions by transforming AtRaptor1B-/- plants with an AtRaptor1A construct. In contrast, AtRaptor1B can fully complement the loss of AtRaptor1A expression; indeed, a single wild-type AtRaptor1B allele in 1A-/- 1B+/- plants is sufficient for wild-type growth.
Our ability to isolate AtRaptor1B mutant homozygotes conflicts with a recent report . In that report, mutants homozygous for AtRaptor1B disruptions were lethal at or before the first asymmetric embryonic division, which is even earlier than the lethality of AtTOR mutant homozygotes. We are uncertain of the reason for the discrepancy in these results. We are able to recover 1B-/- plants, but Deprost et al. , working with the same AtRaptor1B allele (SALK_043920), described them as embryo-lethal. One possible explanation might be a variation in growth conditions, which could lead to a higher degree of stress on developing embryos in the experiments by Deprost et al. The fact that these authors observed some embryo arrest in wild type control lines supports this possibility. Disruption of AtRaptor1A yielded no significant phenotype in either our growth conditions or those of the previous report .
Simultaneous disruption of both AtRaptor loci resulted in growth-arrested seedlings, which undergo normal embryonic organogenesis but are unable to maintain post-embryonic growth from their SAMs. AtRaptor1A-/- AtRaptor1B-/- double mutants' SAMs cease activity after the production of a few leaf primordia. We conclude that AtRaptor activity is essential for the maintenance of SAM activity, but not for SAM assembly or for the initiation of SAM activity.
Our results indicate that AtRaptor activity is not essential for embryonic organogenesis. In contrast, AtTOR-/- mutants arrest development early in embryogenesis . The disparity between the AtRaptor1A-/- 1B-/- and the AtTOR-/-phenotypes indicates that AtTOR activity in embryonic development does not require AtRaptor. Thus if AtTOR is acting in a complex in embryonic development, this complex does not require AtRaptor.
AtRaptor-independent AtTOR activity in the plant embryo is consistent with the existence of two AtTOR complexes in Arabidopsis: 1) a Raptor-independent complex critical for early embryogenesis (and perhaps all stages of plant development), and 2) a Raptor-dependent complex that is dispensable for embryonic development but which is necessary for post-embryonic, meristem-driven plant growth (Fig. 8B).
By identifying the phenotypes resulting from partial and total disruption of AtRaptor activity, we have generated valuable tools for the study of plant TOR signaling. When viewed in the context of previous work on AtTOR [21, 22], our work provides evidence for Raptor-independent TOR activity in land plant embryonic development – development that, notably, occurs in an environment made nutritionally and environmentally stable via maternal input to growth. We propose that in plants as in other eukaryotes there are two (or more) TOR complexes, only one of which involves Raptor. We further propose that the plant homologue of TORC1, involving TOR and Raptor, has been co-opted in plants from its ancestral role in nutrient sensing and cell growth to regulate the highly plastic post-embryonic growth driven by the plant shoot apical meristem.
The mutant lines SALK_043920 and SALK_078159, in which Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA insertions disrupted the AtRaptor1A and AtRaptor1B loci in the Columbia (Col) genetic background, were generated by Joseph R. Ecker and the Salk Institute Genomic Analysis Laboratory (USA) and distributed by the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (USA) . Lines were genotyped using the following primers: 1Asm5 5'aaaaagtctcttagatgtagtttcagatg 3' and 1Asm3 5' attcagaatatacaatccaagcattagt 3' to identify the AtRaptor1A wild-type locus; 1Bsm5 5' ctgaccataacattctcttgtaggtaagg 3' and 1Bsm3 5' aggcctgaactctaatgaacaaactctcc 3' to identify the AtRaptor1B wild-type locus; and 1Bsm5 or 1Asm5 and pROK-737 (5' gggaattcactggccgtcgttttacaa 3') to identify the respective AtRaptor mutant alleles. Mutant lines were crossed to Col wild type plants; the AtRaptor1B mutant phenotype cosegregated with the 1B insertion allele in the F2 population.
Plants were grown in a greenhouse with supplemental light to 16 hrs, with temperatures held at 22°C days and 17°C nights. Seeds for plate-grown seedlings were surface sterilized with 20% Chlorox, washed in H20, stratified for four days at 4°C and grown on 1/2× MS salts, 0.3% Phytagel under 12 hr. daylight cycles.
Buds from Col and insertion line homozygotes were snap-frozen in liquid N2. Total RNA was extracted from 0.3 g of tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Resuspended RNA was thrice treated with DNA-free™ DNase treatment (Ambion). RNA was quantified with a spectrophotometer. cDNA was generated from 2 μg of total RNA using Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase (Qiagen) and a poly-dT18 primer. PCR was performed using ExTaq polymerase (Takara) in a PTC-100 thermocycler. Primer sequences were as follows: 1A+1828, 5' gctgcgtttattttggctgttattgtc 3' and 1A-2800, 5' ctaggccagccagaggagtgtgagatg 3'; 1B+1379, 5' aggccggcaaaacgatcgtaagacatt 3' and 1B-2774, 5' catcagcccagaggagccaagagg 3'. PCR cycling parameters were 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 62°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min.
AtRaptor1B cDNA clone
EST clone RZL03b06 corresponding to the 5' end of AtRaptor1B was ordered from Kazusa DNA Research Institute and sequenced (Accession number AY769948). RNA ligase-mediated RACE was performed on total RNA extracted from bulk shoot tissues using a GeneRacer™ Kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions in order to confirm that RZL03b06 represented a full-length clone.
Assembly of the AtRaptor1Bcomplementation vector
Primers were designed to amplify the region from the end of the transcript adjacent to the AtRaptor1B locus to a site within the ORF, spanning a region from 1145 bases upstream of the transcript initiation site through to the sixth exon of the AtRaptor1B transcript. Primers used and restriction sites added are as follows: 1B-8189BglII 5' agatctgaggaaccagaagaaccc 3'; 1B+5104HindIII 5' aagcttcggcggagtaggaaaac 3'. PCR was performed using ExTaq polymerase (Takara) in a PTC-100 thermocycler on Col-0 genomic DNA with the following parameters: 96°C for 5 min, then 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 2 min, followed by a final step of 72°C for 10 minutes. HindIII BglII digested fragments of the resulting PCR products were ligated into pCambia1301.
Next, the 1301B construct was digested with PmlI and PmeI. The EST containing the AtRaptor1B ORF was digested with PmeI and SmaI, and the resulting fragment was ligated into 1301B to create the complementation vector 1301B:Raptor. 1301B:Raptor was transformed into Agrobacterium line GV3101, and then into Col or 1B-/- plants via floral dip .
SEM fixation was performed using standard methods . Bright field microscopy was performed on a Zeiss microscope, and images were collected on a BioRad Confocal System.
Digoxigenin-labelled probes were hybridized to paraffin-sectioned material using previously described methods .
Locus identifiers were submitted to the Genevestigator Arabidopsis thaliana microarray database and analysis toolbox  at https://www.genevestigator.ethz.ch, where they were assayed against 1434 developmental and tissue-specific Arabidopsis microarray experiment results [35–38].
The authors gratefully acknowledge Barbara Eaglesham for assistance with scanning electron microscopy, Paulina Melechkina for the drawing in Fig. 8 and Nena Alvarez for assistance with in situ hybridization. This work was funded by a fellowship from the National Science Foundation/Department of Energy (DOE)/United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Training Group in Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Processes to GHA, and USDA Hatch Program and DOE Energy Biosciences (DE-F602-89ER14030) grants to MRH. BV was supported by a Marsden award from the Royal Society of New Zealand and by the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology.
- Willemsen V, Sheres B: Mechanisms of pattern formation in plant embryogenesis. Annu Rev Genet. 2004, 38: 587-614. 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Y, Medrano L, Ohashi K, Fletcher JC, Yu H, Sakai H, Meyerowitz EM: HANABA TARANU Is a GATA transcription factor that regulates shoot apical meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2586-600. 10.1105/tpc.104.024869.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hake S, Smith HM, Holtan H, Magnini E, Mele G, Ramirez J: The role of knox genes in plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004, 20: 125-51. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.031803.093824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poethig RS: Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants. Science. 2003, 301: 334-6. 10.1126/science.1085328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas G, Sabatini D, Hall M: TOR Target of Rapamycin. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 279. 2004, New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Jacinto E, Hall MN: Tor signalling in bugs, brain and brawn. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 4: 117-26. 10.1038/nrm1018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmelzle T, Hall MN: TOR, a central controller of cell growth. Cell. 2000, 103: 253-62. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00117-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heitman J, Movva NR, Hall MN: Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science. 1991, 253: 905-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunz J, Henriquez R, Schneider U, M Deuter-Reinhard, Movva NR, Hall MN: Target of rapamycin in yeast, TOR2, is an essential phosphatidylinositol kinase homolog required for G1 progression. Cell. 1993, 73: 585-96. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90144-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbet NC, Schneider U, Helliwell SB, Stansfield I, Tuite MF, Hall MN: TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1996, 7: 25-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helliwell SB, Howald I, Barbet N, Hall MN: TOR2 is part of two related signaling pathways coordinating cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998, 148: 99-112.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murakami M, Ichisaka T, Maeda M, Oshiro N, Hara K, Edenhofer F, H Kiyama, Yonezawa K, Yamanaka S: mTOR is essential for growth and proliferation in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 6710-8. 10.1128/MCB.24.15.6710-6718.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, Lin S, Ruegg MA, Hall A, Hall MN: Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. 2004, 6: 1122-8. 10.1038/ncb1183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DH, Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Latek RR, Guntur KV, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM: GbetaL, a positive regulator of the rapamycin-sensitive pathway required for the nutrient-sensitive interaction between raptor and mTOR. Mol Cell. 2003, 11: 895-904. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00114-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DH, Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, King JE, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM: mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell. 2002, 110: 163-75. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00808-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara K, Maruki Y, Long X, Yoshino K, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Tokunaga C, Avruch J, Yonezawa K: Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin (TOR), mediates TOR action. Cell. 2002, 110: 177-89. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00833-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, Lorberg A, Crespo JL, Bonenfant D, Oppliger W, Jenoe P, Hall MN: Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell. 2002, 10: 457-68. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00636-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ginalski K, Zhang H, Grishin NV: Raptor protein contains a caspase-like domain. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004, 29: 522-4. 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nojima H, Tokunaga C, Eguchi S, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Yoshino K, Hara K, Tanaka N, Avruch J, Yonezawa K: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) partner, raptor, binds the mTOR substrates p70 S6 kinase and 4E-BP1 through their TOR signaling (TOS) motif. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 15461-4. 10.1074/jbc.C200665200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Kim DH, Guertin DA, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM: Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 1296-302. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menand B, Desnos T, Nussaume L, Berger F, Bouchez D, Meyer C, Robaglia C: Expression and disruption of the Arabidopsis TOR (target of rapamycin) gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 6422-7. 10.1073/pnas.092141899.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robaglia C, Menand B, Lei Y, Sormani R, Nicolai M, Gery C, Teoule E, Deprost D, Meyer C: Plant growth: the translational connection. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004, 32: 581-4. 10.1042/BST0320581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonnet E, Wuyts J, Rouze P, Van de Peer Y: Detection of 91 potential conserved plant microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa identifies important target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 11511-6. 10.1073/pnas.0404025101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deprost D, Truong HN, Robaglia C, Meyer C: An Arabidopsis homolog of RAPTOR/KOG1 is essential for early embryo development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 326: 844-50. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shinozaki-Yabana S, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M: Novel WD-repeat protein Mip1p facilitates function of the meiotic regulator Mei2p in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 1234-42. 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1234-1242.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yonezawa K, Tokunaga C, Oshiro N, Yoshino K: Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 313: 437-41. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.07.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann P, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Hennig L, Gruissem W: GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis Microarray Database and Analysis Toolbox. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 2621-32. 10.1104/pp.104.046367. [https://www.genevestigator.ethz.ch]PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rolland F, Moore B, Sheen J: Sugar sensing and signaling in plants. Plant Cell. 2002, 14 (Suppl): S185-205.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward SP, Leyser O: Shoot branching. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004, 7: 73-8. 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shpak ED, CT Berthiaume, Hill EJ, Torii KU: Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development. 2004, 131: 1491-501. 10.1242/dev.01028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, Gadrinab C, Heller C, Jeske A, Koesema E, Meyers CC, Parker H, Prednis L, Ansari Y, Choy N, Deen H, Geralt M, Hazari N, Hom E, Karnes M, Mulholland C, Ndubaku R, Schmidt I, Guzman P, Aguilar-Henonin L, Schmid M, Weigel D, Carter DE, Marchand T, Risseeuw E, Brogden D, Zeko A, Crosby WL, Berry CC, Ecker JR: Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003, 301: 653-7. 10.1126/science.1086391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clough SJ, Bent AF: Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16: 735-43. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson D, Veit B, Hake S: Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development. 1994, 120: 405-413.Google Scholar
- Weigel D, Glazebrook J: Arabidopsis : A Laboratory Manual. 2002, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE: Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 207-10. 10.1093/nar/30.1.207.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rocca-Serra P, Brazma A, Parkinson H, Sarkans U, Shojatalab M, Contrino S, Vilo J, Abeygunawardena N, Mukherjee G, Holloway E, Kapushesky M, Kemmeren P, Lara GG, A Oezcimen, Sansone SA: ArrayExpress: a public database of gene expression data at EBI. C R Biol. 2003, 326: 1075-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parkinson H, Sarkans U, Shojatalab M, Abeygunawardena N, Contrino S, Coulson R, Farne A, Garcia Lara G, Holloway E, Kapushesky M, Lilja P, Mukherjee G, Oezcimen A, Rayner T, Rocca-Serra P, Sharma A, Sansone S, Brazma A: ArrayExpress – a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D553-5. 10.1093/nar/gki056.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craigon DJ, James N, Okyere J, Higgins J, Jotham J, May S: NASCArrays: a repository for microarray data generated by NASC's transcriptomics service. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, D575-7. 10.1093/nar/gkh133. 32 DatabaseGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.