- Research article
- Open Access
PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct translation initiation factor 3 complexes
BMC Biology volume 3, Article number: 14 (2005)
PCI/MPN domain protein complexes comprise the 19S proteasome lid, the COP9 signalosome (CSN), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). The eIF3 complex is thought to be composed of essential core subunits required for global protein synthesis and non-essential subunits that may modulate mRNA specificity. Interactions of unclear significance were reported between eIF3 subunits and PCI proteins contained in the CSN.
Here, we report the unexpected finding that fission yeast has two distinct eIF3 complexes sharing common core subunits, but distinguished by the PCI proteins eIF3e and the novel eIF3m, which was previously annotated as a putative CSN subunit. Whereas neither eIF3e nor eIF3m contribute to the non-essential activities of CSN in cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase control, eif3m, unlike eif3e, is an essential gene required for global cellular protein synthesis and polysome formation. Using a ribonomic approach, this phenotypic distinction was correlated with a different set of mRNAs associated with the eIF3e and eIF3m complexes. Whereas the eIF3m complex appears to associate with the bulk of cellular mRNAs, the eIF3e complex associates with a far more restricted set. The microarray findings were independently corroborated for a random set of 14 mRNAs by RT-PCR analysis.
We propose that the PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct eIF3 complexes that may assist in the translation of different sets of mRNAs.
Three protein complexes that are conserved from yeast to humans, the 19S proteasome lid, the CSN, and eIF3, contain subunits characterized by two protein motifs: the MPN (Mpr1/ Pad1 N-terminal) and the PCI (proteasome/CSN/eIF3) domains . The proteasome 20S catalytic particle and the 19S regulatory subunit cooperate in degrading polyubiquitylated proteins (reviewed in ). The 19S proteasome can be separated into the base complex, which binds and unfolds substrates , and the eight subunit lid complex, which cleaves ubiquitin from substrates, thus apparently facilitating the entry of substrates into the catalytic proteasome barrel [4, 5].
In higher eukaryotes, the subunits of the 19S lid show pair-wise similarity to the eight subunits of the CSN [6–9]. In vivo, CSN promotes the activity of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases [10–16], multiprotein complexes containing cullins, the RING protein RBX1, and one of several hundred substrate-specific adaptors [17–22]. The MPN domain containing CSN subunit 5 harbors a protease motif  that cleaves the ubiquitin-related peptide NEDD8 from cullins [24, 25]. This activity, acting in concert with the CSN-associated deubiquitylation enzyme Ubp12, was proposed to promote cullin function by facilitating the recruitment of labile substrate adaptors [11, 16, 26, 27].
The third PCI/MPN complex, eIF3, is more distantly related to CSN and the 19S lid (reviewed in ). Whereas human eIF3 consists of up to 13 subunits, consecutively named eIF3a – l and GA17 [29, 30], budding yeast contains only six to eight subunits (depending on purification conditions). Five of these subunits are orthologs of human eIF3a, b, c, g, and eIF3i [31, 32] and appear to constitute a conserved core complex [31, 33]. Fission yeast contains the same five core subunits, in addition to the non-core subunits eIF3d/Moe1p, eIF3e/Int6p, and eIF3h [34–36]. A putative eIF3f ortholog was also identified, but biochemical evidence confirming it as an authentic eIF3 subunit functioning in protein synthesis is still outstanding [34, 35, 37, 38].
eIF3 is the most complex translation initiation factor and plays at least two important roles in protein synthesis. First, eIF3 binds to the 40S ribosome and facilitates loading of the Met-tRNA/eIF2· GTP ternary complex to form the 43S preinitiation complex. Subsequently, eIF3 apparently assists eIF4 in recruiting mRNAs to the 43S complex. A critical in vivo function of eIF3 core subunits in these processes was indicated by the lethality of the respective budding yeast deletion strains . In contrast, in fission yeast, the non-core subunits eIF3d and eIF3e are not essential for viability or global protein synthesis [34, 36, 38, 39]. It was therefore proposed that distinct subclasses of eIF3 complexes, containing different combinations of core and non-core subunits, may regulate specific subsets of mRNAs in fission yeast [34, 36, 38, 39]. Our study provides the first experimental evidence substantiating this hypothesis by demonstrating that biochemically distinct eIF3 complexes defined by the PCI domain proteins eIF3e and eIF3m (a novel eIF3 protein) associate with different sets of mRNAs.
Both csn6 and csn7bare essential genes
CSN complexes of higher eukaryotes typically contain eight distinct subunits (two MPN and six PCI proteins). However, in fission yeast only six subunits are known (Csn1p, 2p, 3p, 4p, 5p, 7Ap; Ref. ), none of which are essential for viability [40–42]. We noticed two genes in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome database, originally annotated as csn6 (SPBC4C3.07) and csn7b (SPAC1751.03), which encode MPN and PCI domain containing proteins with considerable similarity to metazoan CSN6 and CSN7B, respectively (data not shown). In order to determine whether these genes might function in the known biochemical pathways regulated by CSN, cullin deneddylation and Ubp12p-mediated deubiquitylation [24, 26], we deleted csn6 and csn7b in wild-type diploid cells. Upon sporulation and tetrad analysis, only two viable spores could be recovered in each case, both of which were uracil auxotroph (Fig. 1A, and data not shown). Thus, unlike the genes encoding the six known subunits of the fission yeast CSN [41, 42], csn6 and csn7b are essential.
Csn6p and Csn7Bp associate with eIF3 components
To elucidate the essential functions of Csn6p and Csn7Bp, we sought to identify their interacting proteins. To this end, we attempted to modify csn6 and csn7b at their endogenous genomic loci with five consecutive protein A epitope tags (proA). The C-terminal tag also contained a cleavage site for Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease upstream of the protein A moieties. Diploid analysis indicated that C-terminal tagging destroyed the essential function of csn6 (data not shown). In contrast, a csn7b-proA haploid strain was viable and did not display any obvious phenotypes (data not shown). This indicated that the tagged allele was functional. Total protein lysate from the csn7b-proA haploid strain was absorbed to Immunoglobulin G (IgG) resin and specifically retained proteins were eluted with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or by cleavage with TEV protease. The two eluates were resolved by gel electrophoresis and Csn7Bp-proA interacting proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.
Both eluates contained an identical set of proteins. In addition to Csn6p, the Csn7Bp complex contained the eIF3 core subunits eIF3a, b, c, and i, as well as the non-core subunit eIF3h (Fig. 1B, Table 1). The eIF3g core subunit was not detected using MALDI-TOF in this purification, but was detected in an independent purification of the Csn7Bp complex using the more sensitive method of nano-liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, see Fig. 5A). However, eIF3e and eIF3d, two previously described components of S. pombe eIF3 [34, 36, 38, 39] were consistently absent from the Csn7Bp complex when analyzed either by MALDI-TOF or by LC-MS/MS (Fig. 1B and 5A).
Notably, no authentic CSN subunits were found in the Csn7Bp complex, consistent with the previous demonstration that S. pombe CSN contains only six non-essential subunits . Structural analysis indicated that Csn6p is not only related to human CSN6, but shows a slightly greater overall similarity to human eIF3f (data not shown). Based on the functional characterization described below (Fig. 2), fission yeast Csn6p therefore appears to be the ortholog of human eIF3f.
A Csn7Bp ortholog is not known in the human eIF3, although the recently identified subunit GA17  shows considerable similarity to Csn7Bp (K. Hofmann, personal communication). In addition, interactions of metazoan CSN7 with eIF3 subunits have previously been observed [43, 44]. With regards to the unified nomenclature of eIF3 subunits , we propose eIF3m as a more appropriate name for the novel fission yeast eIF3 subunit encoded by csn7b (see Table 1). Throughout this manuscript, we will use the proposed new names for the eif3f and eif3m genes and their products. The original annotations have recently been revised by the curator of the S. pombe genome database, in order to reflect the findings presented here.
The eIF3f and eIF3m proteins are primarily cytoplasmic
The evidence presented above suggested that eIF3f and eIF3m are essential subunits of S. pombe eIF3. To substantiate this possibility, we determined the subcellular localization of eIF3f and eIF3m. If these proteins were authentic eIF3 subunits involved in protein synthesis, they should assume a subcellular localization similar to known eIF3 subunits. We therefore prepared three strains with green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged alleles of eIF3b, eIF3e, and eIF3m integrated into their respective genomic loci. In addition, since C-terminal GFP-tagging destroyed the essential function of the small eIF3f protein, we prepared a strain mildly overexpressing N-terminally GFP-tagged eIF3f from a pREP81 plasmid. Fluorescence microscopy of live cells revealed that all four proteins were primarily localized in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A), which would be consistent with a function in protein translation. In contrast, CSN subunits are largely nuclear in fission yeast (, and our own unpublished observation).
eIF3f and eIF3m are required for global protein synthesis
To directly assess the potential role of eIF3f and eIF3m in protein synthesis, we prepared haploid eif3f and eif3m deletion strains maintained viable by plasmids driving the regulated expression of eif3f and eif3m, respectively. Expression from these plasmids could be turned off by the addition of thiamin to the growth media, resulting in a strong reduction in protein levels within 20 to 32 hours (Fig. 2B). Coincident with shut-off of eIF3f and eIF3m expression, global cellular protein synthesis was diminished by ~80%, as determined by metabolic labeling with 35S-methionine (Fig. 2C).
Further biochemical analysis by sucrose gradient velocity centrifugation revealed a strong reduction in the formation of polysomes in eif3f and eif3m mutants following promoter shut-off (Fig. 2D). In contrast, as described previously [34, 36, 38, 39], eif3e mutants showed only a minor reduction in total protein synthesis (data not shown) and essentially normal polysomes (Fig. 2D).
The conserved cullin deneddylation function of CSN was not impaired either in eif3f and eif3m mutants or in eif3e mutants, since cullin 1 (Cul1p) did not accumulate exclusively in the neddylated form as it does in csn5 deletion strains (Fig. 2E). Similarly, unlike in csn5 mutants (Fig. 2E; ), CSN/Ubp12p-mediated inhibition of Cul1p in vitro ubiquitin ligase activity was not impaired upon shut-off of either eif3f or eif3m expression. Cul1p neddylation and activity were also unaffected in eif3e mutants (Fig. 2E). These data suggested that eIF3f and eIF3m are bona fide subunits of fission yeast eIF3 but not CSN, performing essential functions in protein synthesis similar to eIF3 core subunits.
The eIF3m and eIF3e proteins define distinct eIF3 complexes
Although the purification of the eIF3m complex robustly retrieved roughly stoichiometric amounts of known eIF3 subunits, two subunits, eIF3d and eIF3e, were conspicuously absent (Fig. 1B, Table 1). To exclude the possibility that we had overlooked these subunits because they were obscured by the IgG bands, we affinity-purified eIF3e-associated proteins from an eif3e-proA strain. The retrieved proteins were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as before.
Like the eIF3m complex, the eIF3e complex contained roughly stoichiometric amounts of the eIF3 core subunits a, b, c, g, and i (Fig. 3A, Table 1). In addition, eIF3f was present while, unexpectedly, eIF3m and eIF3h were missing. We did not detect the proteasome lid subunit Rpn5p, which previously had been shown to associate with eIF3e and eIF3d . This observation indicated that the described eIF3d/eIF3e/Rpn5p interaction is either unstable under our purification conditions or contains only a minor fraction of the total eIF3e engaged in protein interactions.
These results raised the intriguing possibility that fission yeast contains two distinct eIF3 complexes that comprise an overlapping set of core subunits, but are distinguished by the presence of either the essential PCI protein eIF3m and the MPN domain protein eIF3h or the non-essential PCI protein eIF3e and its binding partner eIF3d. To exclude the possibility that our mass spectrometry analysis missed substoichiometric amounts of eIF3d in the eIF3m complex, we analyzed eIF3m complexes by immunoblotting with eIF3d antisera. Whereas eIF3d was readily detectable in the eIF3e complex, it was undetectable in the eIF3m complex (Fig. 3B). In the reciprocal experiment, eIF3d antibodies co-immunoprecipitated eIF3e-13Myc, but not eIF3m-13Myc or Csn5p-13Myc (Fig. 3C).
To exclude the possibility that our cell lysis or affinity purification conditions led to uncontrolled release of eIF3 subunits, thus mimicking the existence of distinct subcomplexes, we performed a purification using the protein A-tagged eIF3b core subunit as bait. As determined by LC-MS/MS performed on excised bands detected in the complex upon PAGE separation, the eIF3b complex contained all known eIF3 core components as well as eIF3f and eIF3m (Fig. 3D). The eIF3e and eIF3d proteins were also present, albeit in clearly substoichiometric amounts. These findings indicate that purification of eIF3b resulted in the copurification of the distinct eIF3m- and eIF3e-containing complexes. Taken together, these data strongly suggested the existence of two distinct eIF3 complexes defined by the PCI proteins eIF3m and eIF3e.
The eIF3m and eIF3e proteins associate with distinct sets of mRNAs
The finding that eif3m is essential, whereas eif3e is dispensable, suggested the possibility that the different eIF3 complexes they define regulate different subsets of mRNAs. To approach this, we sought to identify mRNAs specifically associated with the eIF3m and eIF3e complexes. The complexes were affinity-purified as described above in the presence of RNAse inhibitors, and the associated RNA was extracted, amplified, and converted to Cy3-labeled cDNA as described in the Methods section. The Cy3-labeled cDNA was hybridized competitively with Cy5-labeled cDNA prepared from total RNA onto microarrays representing all 4988 predicted S. pombe open reading frames (ORFs) and RNAs. Based on the background subtracted hybridization signals, eIF3-associated mRNAs were ranked according to their factor of enrichment in the eIF3m and eIF3e complexes over a mock purified sample ([see additional file 1]).
The microarray analysis suggested a global role for eIF3m and a more restricted function of eIF3e in translation. Using an arbitrary cut-off value of three-fold enrichment over mock, eIF3m associated with 2464 different mRNAs, whereas eIF3e associated with only 520 distinct species (Fig. 4A). We observed 414 mRNAs enriched more than three-fold in both samples. (Fig. 4A). In addition, our analysis revealed 106 mRNAs uniquely enriched in the eIF3e complex, whereas 2050 transcripts were uniquely enriched in the eIF3m complex (Fig. 4A,C).
A ranked list of all 106 mRNAs that were uniquely enriched more than three-fold in the eIF3e complex was assembled ([see additional file 2]). Approximately 75% of these mRNAs fell into one of three categories: mRNAs encoding proteins involved in intermediary metabolism (25.5%), those encoding proteins involved in protein metabolism (14.2%), and those encoding proteins with unknown functions (35.8%; Fig. 4B). The remainder was distributed roughly equally among four categories: mRNAs encoding proteins involved in nucleic acid metabolism, those encoding proteins involved in transcription, those encoding transporter proteins, and those encoding unclassified proteins.
A corresponding list of the 106 most highly enriched mRNAs exclusively present in the eIF3m complex (out of a total of 2050 enriched by a factor greater than three) revealed that ~58% also fell into three categories: mRNAs encoding proteins involved in nucleic acid metabolism (9.4%), those encoding transporter proteins (18.9%), and those encoding proteins of unknown function (20.8%). The remainder was roughly equally distributed among four categories: mRNAs encoding proteins involved in intermediary metabolism, those mRNAs encoding proteins involved in protein metabolism, those encoding proteins involved in transcription, and those encoding unclassified proteins (Fig. 4B, [see additional file 2]).
To exclude the possibility that our affinity purification protocol unspecifically enriched highly expressed mRNAs, we averaged the data from the three competively hybridized samples of total S. pombe cDNA to determine the relative expression rank of each mRNA (rank 1 = most abundant mRNA, rank 5407 = least abundant mRNA; see legend to Fig. 4C for detail). A plot of expression rank vs. factor of enrichment of the 106 mRNAs most enriched in the eIF3e and eIF3m complexes revealed that the eIF3m complex contained mRNAs that were distributed equally over the entire range of expression levels. In contrast, the eIF3e complex was enriched for rare mRNAs (~65 % of eIF3e-associated mRNAs had an expression rank > 4000; see Fig. 4C). The lack of a linear correlation between mRNA expression level and enrichment in the eIF3e and eIF3m complexes argues against unspecific copurification of abundant mRNAs.
Specific association of mRNAs with eIF3m and eIF3e complexes
To validate the results from the microarray hybridizations, we chose several mRNAs at random from each list of 106 and used RT-PCR to confirm their interactions with the respective eIF3 complexes. eIF3e-proA- and eIF3m-proA-associated complexes were affinity-purified as before and separated by PAGE. Both complexes showed the same differential subunit composition as described above (Fig. 5A). The associated RNA was purified, split into equal portions, and employed in RT-PCR reactions with gene-specific primer pairs.
The RT-PCR analysis of a total of fourteen mRNAs included eight mRNAs identified in the eIF3e complex, five mRNAs identified in the eIF3m complex, and one mRNA found to be associated with both complexes with similar enrichment factors. These mRNAs varied widely in their factors of enrichment and their enrichment ranks as indicated in Fig. 5B. Without exception, all eight mRNAs found to be enriched in the eIF3e complex by microarray analysis were also found preferentially associated with this complex by RT-PCR (Fig. 5B). Based on this result, we calculate a false positive rate of less than 0.11 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.00 – 0.31. Whereas mRNAs with a high enrichment factor (>10, [see additional file 2]) appeared to be exclusively associated with eIF3e-proA (within the limit of detection), those with a lower enrichment factor (<10) also displayed a low amount of association with the eIF3m complex (Fig. 5B). Conversely, all five mRNAs highly enriched in the eIF3m complex as determined by microarray analysis ([see additional file 2]) were almost exclusively bound to this complex when analyzed by RT-PCR (Fig. 5B).
Notably, the mRNA encoding the proteasome subunit Rpn5p, which was found in both complexes by microarray analysis with similar enrichment factors (eIF3e = 5.1; eIF3m = 8.1) was also confirmed as being associated with both eIF3 complexes by RT-PCR (Fig. 5B). These results strongly suggest that the eIF3m and eIF3e complexes specifically associate with distinct sets of mRNAs.
PCI proteins define distinct eIF3 complexes
Our results show that Csn6p and Csn7Bp are subunits of fission yeast eIF3. Csn6p was shown to be the eIF3f subunit conserved in all eukaryotes except budding yeast. Consistent with this finding, eIF3f has previously been found to be associated with eIF3g, although the role of eIF3f in protein synthesis had not been examined . Our study further identified two distinct eIF3 complexes defined by the PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m (Fig. 3A). No direct equivalent of eIF3m is apparent in eIF3 preparations from other eukaryotes. Considering the essential function of eIF3m in protein synthesis in fission yeast, it is possible that other PCI proteins substitute for eIF3m in other organisms.
Consistent with this idea is the finding that the PCI domain containing GA17, a recently identified protein copurifying with human eIF3 , shows more similarity to eIF3m than to any other PCI protein (K. Hofmann, personal communication). In addition, the PCI domain containing CSN subunits 1, 3, 7, and 8 were found to interact with eIF3 subunits in Arabidopsis thaliana and in human cells [43, 44, 46]. In addition, Pci8p/Csn11p, a non-essential PCI subunit of the budding yeast CSN [47, 48], copurifies with essential eIF3 core subunits . Although the functional significance of these interactions is still unclear, our findings raise the intriguing possibility that they define multiple subclasses of distinct eIF3 complexes. Whereas fission yeast appears to rely on an essential eIF3 complex classified by eIF3m and a non-essential complex specified by eIF3e, higher eukaryotes may divide the task of mRNA translation among a multitude of eIF3 complexes. Since the individual PCI proteins defining these subcomplexes are expected to be present in substoichiometric amounts relative to core components, as is eIF3e in the S. pombe core complex, they may have escaped detection in bulk eIF3 preparations from higher eukaryotes.
Distinct eIF3 complexes and translational specificity
Although our finding of distinct eIF3 complexes that associate with different sets of mRNAs was surprising, circumstantial evidence pointing to their existence was provided in previous studies. For example, fission yeast eIF3e copurifies with eIF3 core subunits, and yet, unlike core subunits, eIF3e is not required for global protein synthesis or viability. Two competing models were proposed to explain the pleiotropic phenotype of eif3e deletion mutants, which includes slow growth in minimal media and meiotic defects [34, 36, 38, 39, 50, 51]. In the first model, eIF3e regulates the translation of all transcripts, but rare mRNAs may be more affected by a fractional reduction in translation efficiency and thus give rise to distinct phenotypes. In the second model, eIF3e regulates the translation of a specific subset of mRNAs encoding proteins whose depletion leads to distinct phenotypes but not lethality. The findings presented here strongly favor the second model.
Our microarray analysis revealed 106 mRNAs uniquely enriched in the eIF3e complex, many being rare, whereas 2050 transcripts were uniquely enriched in the eIF3m complex. The latter finding is consistent with the severe protein synthesis defect and lethality of eif3m deletion mutants. Whereas these mRNA lists were based on an arbitrary cut-off value of three-fold enrichment over mock, this criterion proved stringent enough to confirm specific association with their respective eIF3 complexes of all 14 mRNAs retested by RT-PCR. Thus, since we calculate the false positive rate to be less than 0.11 with 95% confidence interval 0.00 – 0.31, the maximum number of mRNAs listed potentially false positively as enriched in the eIF3e complex would be 33 out of 106 (with 95% confidence).
However, we consider it unlikely that all mRNAs found enriched in the eIF3e complex are exclusive translational targets of this complex, because the cellular phenotypes of eif3e mutants are rather discrete. Although many of the eIF3e-associated mRNAs encode essential proteins, viability, global protein synthesis, and polysome formation are not affected in these mutants when they are grown in rich media (Fig. 2D, and data not shown). It is therefore likely that eIF3m or other PCI domain proteins can deputize for eIF3e in many cases. In fact, our microarray study revealed that a substantial portion of eIF3e-associated mRNAs was also recovered in the eIF3m complex (Fig. 4A). Nonetheless, we strongly suspect that inefficient translation of a limited set of eIF3e-associated mRNAs contributes to distinct cellular phenotypes found in eif3e mutants (see below).
The eIF3e protein and translational control during stress response
The eif3e mutants display marked sensitivity to a wide variety of cellular stresses, such as osmotic stress, nutrient starvation, and low temperature [34, 38, 39, 50, 52] In addition, eif3e mutants show synthetic lethality with proteasome mutants, which are presumed to accumulate a large load of misfolded proteins . Conversely, overexpression of eif3e confers resistance to a broad spectrum of unrelated drugs, whose only commonality appears to be that they induce cellular stress . Overexpression of eIF3e also activates genes involved in stress defense, such as thioredoxin . Interestingly, the mRNA encoding thioredoxin was also identified as a putative translational target of eIF3e ([see additional file 2]). Finally, eIF3e undergoes relocalization into cytoplasmic foci in response to heat and osmotic stress, thus implicating it in stress regulation .
Global protein synthesis is actively switched off in response to cellular stress and nutrient deprivation (reviewed in Refs. [53, 54]). This shut-off protects cells from proteotoxicity by relieving chaperones of their load of unfolded client proteins, conserving amino acids for other essential functions, and attenuating the metabolic consequences of protein synthesis. However, long-term adaptation to stress conditions, repair and recovery require synthesis of new stress-induced proteins. During the stress response, some mRNAs must be translated in the presence of a repressed general translation machinery, suggesting that select eIFs can escape the global repression. Our studies raise the intriguing possibility that the eIF3e complex has such a specialized function during stress response. Lack of eif3e may prevent stress-induced synthesis of its critical translational targets, thus leading to the known stress sensitivity of the mutant. Substantial additional work will be required to address this possibility.
Potential mechanisms underlying mRNA discrimination by eIF3 complexes
Several lines of evidence have begun to implicate other general translation factors, including eIF2 and eIF4, in translational specificity . Importantly, these factors are downstream of important signaling cascades, including the nutrient-sensing TOR pathway and a variety of stress-induced kinases (reviewed in Refs. [55, 56]). Although the details of these regulatory mechanisms are beginning to emerge, it is still unclear exactly how eIF2 and eIF4 contribute to mRNA specificity.
Since eIF3 cooperates with the cap-binding eIF4 complex in directing the 5' end of mRNAs to the 40S ribosome, and several eIF3 subunits contain RNA binding motifs, our data is consistent with a model in which eIF3 complexes defined by distinct PCI proteins recognize determining features of mRNAs presented to the 40S subunit in concert with eIF4. In agreement with this idea is the recent finding that the human PCI protein eIF3a specifically facilitates the translation of the mRNA encoding ribonucleotide reductase M2 . In addition, A. thaliana eIF3h, a non-core subunit, was recently shown to be specifically required for efficient translation of the transcription factor ATB2 .
While we have so far been unsuccessful in identifying common sequence elements within the upstream regions of mRNAs enriched in the eIF3e complex (data not shown), this analysis was severely hampered by the fact that 5'UTRs are poorly defined in S. pombe. It is therefore still possible that critical features, including secondary structure determinants, lie within the 5'UTR or other regions of eIF3e-associated mRNAs. Substantial additional work will be required to delineate the exact mechanism of how eIF3e may contribute to the translation of specific mRNAs and the potential impact of this mechanism on human cancers defective in INT6/eIF3e [58, 59].
We provide biochemical evidence for the existence of two distinct eIF3 complexes in fission yeast. These complexes contain an overlapping set of subunits, but are distinguished by the PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m. Based on the finding that the distinct eIF3 complexes associate with different mRNAs, we propose that they have different translational specificities.
Fission yeast techniques
Preparation of fission yeast cultures, cDNA cloning, yeast transformation, PCR-based genomic epitope tagging and gene deletion, mating, and tetrad analysis were carried out using standard methods as described . The strains used in this study are listed in Table 2.
Affinity purification and mass spectrometry
Epitope-tagged strains (eif3m-proA and eif3e-proA strains) were grown in 12 L yeast extract and supplements (YES) medium to 1.5 optical density (OD) at 595nm wavelength and harvested by centrifugation. Cell lysates were prepared by bead lysis in a lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol, supplemented with protease inhibitors (10 ug/ml leupeptin, 10 ug/ml pepstatin, 5 ug/ml aprotinin and 1mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride). Upon centrifugation at 17,000 rpm for 50 min at 4°C, 300 mg total protein in a volume of 50 ml was absorbed to 100 ul Dyna beads (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway) coupled to whole rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunochemicals, West Grove, Pennsylvania, USA). Mock purifications were performed in parallel by absorbing lysate from cells lacking any tagged proteins to IgG beads. Beads were collected by a magnetic device and washed five times in 5 ml lysis buffer. TEV protease (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) cleavage or elution in 5% SDS solution were used to collect bound proteins. Eluted proteins were separated on trycine gels or by conventional SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and visualized by Coomassie G250 staining. Protein bands were excised from gels, digested with trypsin (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), and subjected to mass spectrometry. The eIF3 complexes were analyzed by MALDI-TOF, and by LC-MS/MS at the Harvard NIEHS Center Proteomics Facility, according to standard procedures.
Protein synthesis and polysome analysis
The eif3f and eif3m conditional shut-off strains were inoculated in 10 ml Edinburgh Minimal Media (EMM) with or without thiamin and cultured at 30°C for 30 hrs. 100 uCi 35S-methionine were added to the cells, which were labeled for 30 min and then harvested by centrifugation. Cell lysates were prepared by bead disruption and equal amounts of the lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. 35S-methionine incorporation was determined by autoradiography and quantified by PhosphorImager analysis (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA).
Polysome analysis was performed exactly as described in Ref. . Briefly, cells were grown in EMM with or without thiamin for 30 hrs. Cycloheximide (100 ug/ml) was added to each culture for 20 min. Cells were harvested and lysed in breaking buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 ug/ml cycloheximide, 0.2 mg/heparin, 50 U/ml SuperRNasein, and protease inhibitors), followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min. 20 A260 nm units of each supernatant in a volume of 500 ul were fractionated on 5-45 % sucrose gradients for 3 hrs at 30,000 rpm using a SW40-Ti rotor in a Beckman L70 centrifuge. Polysome profiles were obtained by monitoring the absorbance at 254 nm along the gradient using a Bio-Rad fractionator, and the output was recorded using a Bio-Rad UV detector.
RNAs associated with the eIF3e and eIF3m complexes were purified as described above. Primer design and RT-PCR conditions were according to the manual supplied with the Platinum Quantitative RT-PCR Thermoscript kit (Invitrogen). Primers used for RT-PCR are listed in Table 3. The primer concentration for actin amplification was 0.25 uM. Other primers were used at 1 uM. Total RNA was obtained as described .
Immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and in vitro ubiquitination assays were carried out exactly as described previously . Antibodies against protein A and ubiquitin were purchased from Sigma and Genzyme (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), respectively. Anti-eIF3d/Moe1p polyclonal antibody was provided by E. Chang (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA)
The eIF3 complexes were affinity-purified as described above, except that 50 U/ml SuperRNasein (Ambion, Austin, Texas, USA) and 5 mM ribonucleoside vanadyl complex (New England Biolab, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA) were added to the lysis buffer. A mock purification was performed under identical conditions with lysate from cells lacking any tagged proteins. The methods for extraction of RNA, cDNA synthesis, RNA amplification, and aminoallyl labeling were adopted from previous publications [61, 62]. Briefly, after binding and washing, beads were treated with 3 U/ul DNase I, followed by elution with 5 % SDS, extraction with phenol/chloroform and then ethanol precipitation. The associated RNA was reversely transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL Division of Invitrogen) with 1 uM oligo-dT(15)-T7 primer (5'-AAA CGA CGG CCA GTG AAT TGT AAT ACG ACT CAC TAT AGG CGC-3') and 1 uM template switch primer (5'-AAG CAG TGG TAT CAA CGC AGA GTA CGC GGG-3'). Full-length double stranded (ds)-cDNA was synthesized using Advantage Polymerase (Clontech, BD Biosciences, Mountain View, California, USA). Newly synthesized ds-cDNA was passed through Bio-6 columns (Bio-Rad) and dried. RNA amplification was performed with the T7 megascript kit (Ambion). Amplified RNA was purified using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reversely transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase in the presence of aminoallyl-dUTP in reactions primed with oligo-dT (Invitrogen). After RNAse H digestion and purification on QIAquick columns (Qiagen), the aminoallyl-cDNA was labeled with Cy3, and purified on QIAquick columns. Control Cy5-labeled aminoallyl-cDNA was made by oligo dT primed reverse transcription of total S. pombe RNA.
Labeled cDNAs were hybridized onto glass slide microarrays. Microarrays were made by spotting purified ds-PCR products 500 to 1200 bp in length onto glass slides coated with aminopropylsilane (Erie Scientific, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA). The PCR products used represented 4988 predicted ORFs and transcripts as annotated by the Sanger Centre  and are located at the 3' end of predicted genes to maximize sensitivity in detecting oligo-dT primed reverse transcription products. Descriptions of primer pairs and the features on the microarrays are available at the Longhorn Array Database .
Median pixel intensities for each spot obtained from hybridizations of eIF3-associated RNA ([see additional file 1, sheet 1]) were corrected by local background subtraction and divided by the corresponding values obtained from a mock purification. This resulted in the factor of enrichment of mRNAs bound to eIF3 complexes over mock. The mRNAs were ranked according to their factor of enrichment ([see additional file 1, sheet 2]). An enrichment factor of three was chosen as an arbitrary threshold. We found 2464 mRNAs were enriched greater than three-fold over mock in the eIF3m complex, while we observed 520 mRNAs enriched in the eIF3e complex ([see additional file 1, sheet 3]). Comparison of the data sets revealed 414 mRNAs that occurred in both complexes, 2050 mRNAs uniquely enriched in the eIF3m complex and 106 mRNAs that were exclusively enriched in the eIF3e complex ([see additional file 1, sheet 4; additional file 2]). A corresponding list of the 106 mRNAs most highly and uniquely enriched in the eIF3m complex was assembled ([see additional file 2]) and used to select specific mRNAs for RT-PCR analysis.
The competitive Cy5-labeled total cDNA provided clear microarray feature identification and a guide to relative sequence abundance in the pre-purification sample from which the relative expression rank of each mRNA was determined ([see additional file 1, sheet 2]). In this study, data were not adjusted by ratio normalization to total RNA signals or local area normalization functions. The microarray data were deposited with the public ArrayExpress (E-MEXP-208)  and GEO  databases.
Eukaryotic initiation factor
Edinburgh Minimal Media
Green fluorescent protein
- LC MS/MS:
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Proteasome, COP9 Signalosome, eIF3
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Tobacco etch virus
Yeast extract and supplements (growth media)
Hofmann K, Bucher P: The PCI domain: a common theme in three multiprotein complexes. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998, 23: 204-205. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01217-1.
Glickman MH, Ciechanover A: The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev. 2002, 82: 373-428.
Lam YA, Lawson TG, Velayutham M, Zweier JL, Pickart CM: A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature. 2002, 416: 763-767. 10.1038/416763a.
Verma R, Aravind L, Oania R, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Koonin EV, Deshaies RJ: Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science. 2002, 298: 611-615. 10.1126/science.1075898.
Yao T, Cohen RE: A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature. 2002, 419: 403-407. 10.1038/nature01071.
Glickman MH, Rubin DM, Coux O, Wefes I, Pfeifer G, Cjeka Z, Baumeister W, Fried VA, Finley D: A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell. 1998, 94: 615-623. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81603-7.
Wei N, Deng XW: Characterization and purification of the mammalian COP9 complex, a conserved nuclear regulator initially identified as a repressor of photomorphogenesis in higher plants. Photochem Photobiol. 1998, 68: 237-241. 10.1562/0031-8655(1998)068<0237:CAPOTM>2.3.CO;2.
Seeger M, Kraft R, Ferrell K, Bech-Otschir D, Dumdey R, Schade R, Gordon C, Naumann M, Dubiel W: A novel protein complex involved in signal transduction possessing similarities to 26S proteasome subunits. Faseb J. 1998, 12: 469-478.
Henke W, Ferrell K, Bech-Otschir D, Seeger M, Schade R, Jungblut P, Naumann M, Dubiel W: Comparison of human COP9 signalsome and 26S proteasome lid. Mol Biol Rep. 1999, 26: 29-34. 10.1023/A:1006991419464.
Schwechheimer C, Serino G, Callis J, Crosby WL, Lyapina S, Deshaies RJ, Gray WM, Estelle M, Deng XW: Interactions of the COP9 signalosome with the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFTIRI in mediating auxin response. Science. 2001, 292: 1379-1382. 10.1126/science.1059776.
Cope GA, Deshaies RJ: COP9 signalosome: a multifunctional regulator of SCF and other cullin-based ubiquitin ligases. Cell. 2003, 114: 663-671. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00722-0.
Doronkin S, Djagaeva I, Beckendorf SK: The COP9 signalosome promotes degradation of Cyclin E during early Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 699-710. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00121-7.
Liu C, Powell KA, Mundt K, Wu L, Carr AM, Caspari T: Cop9/signalosome subunits and Pcu4 regulate ribonucleotide reductase by both checkpoint-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 1130-1140. 10.1101/gad.1090803.
Wang X, Feng S, Nakayama N, Crosby WL, Irish V, Deng XW, Wei N: The COP9 Signalosome Interacts with SCF(UFO) and Participates in Arabidopsis Flower Development. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 1071-1082. 10.1105/tpc.009936.
Feng S, Ma L, Wang X, Xie D, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Wei N, Deng XW: The COP9 signalosome interacts physically with SCF COI1 and modulates jasmonate responses. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 1083-1094. 10.1105/tpc.010207.
Wee S, Geyer RK, Toda T, Wolf DA: CSN facilitates Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase function by counteracting autocatalytic adapter instability. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7: 387-391. 10.1038/ncb1241.
Feldman RM, Correll CC, Kaplan KB, Deshaies RJ: A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1p. Cell. 1997, 91: 221-230. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80404-3.
Skowyra D, Craig KL, Tyers M, Elledge SJ, Harper JW: F-box proteins are receptors that recruit phosphorylated substrates to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex. Cell. 1997, 91: 209-219. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80403-1.
Geyer R, Wee S, Anderson S, Yates JRI, Wolf DA: BTB/POZ domain proteins are putative substrate adaptors for cullin 3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell. 2003, 12: 783-790. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00341-1.
Xu L, Wei Y, Reboul J, Vaglio P, Shin TH, Vidal M, Elledge SJ, Harper JW: BTB proteins are substrate-specific adaptors in an SCF-like modular ubiquitin ligase containing CUL-3. Nature. 2003, 425: 316-321. 10.1038/nature01985.
Pintard L, Willis JH, Willems A, Johnson JL, Srayko M, Kurz T, Glaser S, Mains PE, Tyers M, Bowerman B, Peter M: The BTB protein MEL-26 is a substrate-specific adaptor of the CUL-3 ubiquitin-ligase. Nature. 2003, 425: 311-316. 10.1038/nature01959.
Furukawa M, He YJ, Borchers C, Xiong Y: Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5: 1001-1007. 10.1038/ncb1056.
Ambroggio XI, Rees DC, Deshaies RJ: JAMM: A Metalloprotease-Like Zinc Site in the Proteasome and Signalosome. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2: 0113-0119. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020002.
Lyapina S, Cope G, Shevchenko A, Serino G, Tsuge T, Zhou C, Wolf DA, Wei N, Shevchenko A, Deshaies RJ: Promotion of NEDD8-CUL1 conjugate cleavage by COP9 signalosome. Science. 2001, 292: 1382-1385. 10.1126/science.1059780.
Cope G, Suh GSB, Aravind L, Schwarz SE, Zipursky SL, Koonin EV, Deshaies RJ: Role of Predicted Metalloprotease Motif of Jab1/Csn5 in Cleavage of NEDD8 from CUL1. Science. 2002, 298: 608-611. 10.1126/science.1075901.
Zhou C, Wee S, Rhee E, Naumann M, Dubiel W, Wolf DA: Fission Yeast COP9/Signalosome Suppresses Cullin Activity through Recruitment of the Deubiquitylating Enzyme Ubp12p. Mol Cell. 2003, 11: 927-938. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00136-9.
Wolf DA, Zhou C, Wee S: The COP9 signalosome: an assembly and maintenance platform for cullin ubiquitin ligases?. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5: 1029-1033. 10.1038/ncb1203-1029.
Kim T, Hofmann K, von Arnim AG, Chamovitz DA: PCI complexes: pretty complex interactions in diverse signaling pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6: 379-386. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02015-5.
Browning KS, Gallie DR, Hershey JW, Hinnebusch AG, Maitra U, Merrick WC, Norbury C: Unified nomenclature for the subunits of eukaryotic initiation factor 3. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001, 26: 284-10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01825-4.
Unbehaun A, Borukhov SI, Hellen CU, Pestova TV: Release of initiation factors from 48S complexes during ribosomal subunit joining and the link between establishment of codon-anticodon base-pairing and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 3078-3093. 10.1101/gad.1255704.
Phan L, Zhang X, Asano K, Anderson J, Vornlocher HP, Greenberg JR, Qin J, Hinnebusch AG: Identification of a translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) core complex, conserved in yeast and mammals, that interacts with eIF5. Mol Cell Biol. 1998, 18: 4935-4946.
Naranda T, MacMillan SE, Hershey JW: Purified yeast translational initiation factor eIF-3 is an RNA-binding protein complex that contains the PRT1 protein. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 32286-32292.
Asano K, Vornlocher HP, Richter-Cook NJ, Merrick WC, Hinnebusch AG, Hershey JW: Structure of cDNAs encoding human eukaryotic initiation factor 3 subunits. Possible roles in RNA binding and macromolecular assembly. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 27042-27052. 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27042.
Akiyoshi Y, Clayton J, Phan L, Yamamoto M, Hinnebusch AG, Watanabe Y, Asano K: Fission yeast homolog of murine Int-6 protein, encoded by mouse mammary tumor virus integration site, is associated with the conserved core subunits of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 10056-10062. 10.1074/jbc.M010188200.
Dunand-Sauthier I, Walker C, Wilkinson C, Gordon C, Crane R, Norbury C, Humphrey T: Sum1, a component of the fission yeast eIF3 translation initiation complex, is rapidly relocalized during environmental stress and interacts with components of the 26S proteasome. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 1626-1640. 10.1091/mbc.01-06-0301.
Bandyopadhyay A, Lakshmanan V, Matsumoto T, Chang EC, Maitra U: Moe1 and spInt6, the fission yeast homologues of mammalian translation initiation factor 3 subunits p66 (eIF3d) and p48 (eIF3e), respectively, are required for stable association of eIF3 subunits. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 2360-2367. 10.1074/jbc.M107790200.
Burks EA, Bezerra PP, Le H, Gallie DR, Browning KS: Plant initiation factor 3 subunit composition resembles mammalian initiation factor 3 and has a novel subunit. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 2122-2131.
Crane R, Craig R, Murray R, Dunand-Sauthier I, Humphrey T, Norbury C: A fission yeast homolog of Int-6, the mammalian oncoprotein and eIF3 subunit, induces drug resistance when overexpressed. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 3993-4003.
Bandyopadhyay A, Matsumoto T, Maitra U: Fission yeast Int6 is not essential for global translation initiation, but deletion of int6(+) causes hypersensitivity to caffeine and affects spore formation. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 4005-4018.
Mundt KE, Porte J, Murray JM, Brikos C, Christensen PU, Caspari T, Hagan IM, Millar JB, Simanis V, Hofmann K, Carr AM: The COP9/signalosome complex is conserved in fission yeast and has a role in S phase. Curr Biol. 1999, 9: 1427-1430. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80091-3.
Mundt KE, Liu C, Carr AM: Deletion mutants in COP9/signalosome subunits in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe display distinct phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13: 493-502. 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0521.
Zhou C, Seibert V, Geyer R, Rhee E, Lyapina S, Cope G, Deshaies RJ, Wolf DA: The fission yeast COP9/signalosome is involved in cullin modification by ubiquitin-related Ned8p. BMC Biochemistry. 2001, 2: 7-10.1186/1472-2091-2-7.
Yahalom A, Kim TH, Winter E, Karniol B, von Arnim AG, Chamovitz DA: Arabidopsis eIF3e (INT-6) associates with both eIF3c and the COP9 signalosome subunit CSN7. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 334-340. 10.1074/jbc.M006721200.
Hoareau Alves K, Bochard V, Rety S, Jalinot P: Association of the mammalian proto-oncoprotein Int-6 with the three protein complexes eIF3, COP9 signalosome and 26S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 2002, 527: 15-21. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03147-2.
Yen HC, Gordon C, Chang EC: Schizosaccharomyces pombe Int6 and Ras homologs regulate cell division and mitotic fidelity via the proteasome. Cell. 2003, 112: 207-217. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00043-6.
Kim TH, Kim BH, Yahalom A, Chamovitz DA, von Arnim AG: Translational regulation via 5' mRNA leader sequences revealed by mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis translation initiation factor subunit eIF3h. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 3341-3356. 10.1105/tpc.104.026880.
Wee S, Hetfeld B, Dubiel W, Wolf DA: Conservation of the COP9/signalosome in budding yeast. BMC Genet. 2002, 3: 15-10.1186/1471-2156-3-15.
Maytal-Kivity V, Piran R, Pick E, Hofmann K, Glickman MH: COP9 signalosome components play a role in the mating pheromone response of S. cerevisiae. EMBO Rep. 2002, 3: 1215-1221. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf235.
Shalev A, Valasek L, Pise-Masison CA, Radonovich M, Phan L, Clayton J, He H, Brady JN, Hinnebusch AG, Asano K: Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Pci8p and human protein eIF3e/Int-6 interact with the eIF3 core complex by binding to cognate eIF3b subunits. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 34948-34957. 10.1074/jbc.M102161200.
Yen HC, Chang EC: Yin6, a fission yeast Int6 homolog, complexes with Moe1 and plays a role in chromosome segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 14370-14375. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14370.
Chen CR, Li YC, Chen J, Hou MC, Papadaki P, Chang EC: Moe1, a conserved protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interacts with a Ras effector, Scd1, to affect proper spindle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 517-522. 10.1073/pnas.96.2.517.
Ptushkina M, Malys N, McCarthy JE: eIF4E isoform 2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a novel stress-response factor. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5: 311-316. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400088.
Ron D: Translational control in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1383-1388. 10.1172/JCI200216784.
Kaufman RJ: Orchestrating the unfolded protein response in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1389-1398. 10.1172/JCI200216886.
Dever TE: Gene-specific regulation by general translation factors. Cell. 2002, 108: 545-556. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00642-6.
Clemens MJ: Targets and mechanisms for the regulation of translation in malignant transformation. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 3180-3188. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207544.
Dong Z, Liu LH, Han B, Pincheira R, Zhang JT: Role of eIF3 p170 in controlling synthesis of ribonucleotide reductase M2 and cell growth. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 3790-3801. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207465.
Marchetti A, Buttitta F, Pellegrini S, Bertacca G, Callahan R: Reduced expression of INT-6/eIF3-p48 in human tumors. Int J Oncol. 2001, 18: 175-179.
Miyazaki S, Imatani A, Ballard L, Marchetti A, Buttitta F, Albertsen H, Nevanlinna HA, Gallahan D, Callahan R: The chromosome location of the human homolog of the mouse mammary tumor-associated gene INT6 and its status in human breast carcinomas. Genomics. 1997, 46: 155-158. 10.1006/geno.1997.4996.
Bachand F, Silver PA: PRMT3 is a ribosomal protein methyltransferase that affects the cellular levels of ribosomal subunits. Embo J. 2004, 23: 2641-2650. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600265.
Wang E, Miller LD, Ohnmacht GA, Liu ET, Marincola FM: High-fidelity mRNA amplification for gene profiling. Nature Biotechnology. 2000, 18: 457-459. 10.1038/74546.
Hieronymus H, Silver PA: Genome-wide analysis of RNA-protein interactions illustrates specificity of the mRNA export machinery. Nat Genet. 2003, 33: 155-161. 10.1038/ng1080.
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. [http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_pombe/DNA_download.shtml]
Longhorn Array Database. [http://swi4.redgreengene.com/ilat/]
EMBL - EBI Arrayexpress Database . [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/]
National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus Database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/]
We thank E. Chang for eIF3d/Moe1p antisera, V. Leautaud, G. Dittmar, F. Bachand, and P. Silver for help with polysome analyses, and M. Schmidt and A. Houseman for assistance with microarray data analysis. This study was funded by National Institute of Health (NIH) grant GM59780 to DAW, NIH grant P40 RR16320 to JL, by the NIEHS Center Grant ES-00002, and the NIEHS Training Grant ES07155.
CZ performed the bulk of the experiments shown in this study. FA and SW prepared various strains used in this study. SK and ARI performed mass spectrometry. AO performed the microarray hybridizations, and JL participated in the design of the microarray studies and in data analysis. DAW contributed to study design and drafting of the manuscript.