- Open Access
MultiBac: from protein complex structures to synthetic viral nanosystems
© Berger et al. 2017
Published: 30 October 2017
The MultiBac baculovirus/insect cell expression vector system was conceived as a user-friendly, modular tool-kit for producing multiprotein complexes for structural biology applications. MultiBac has allowed the structure and function of many molecular machines to be elucidated, including previously inaccessible high-value drug targets. More recently, MultiBac developments have shifted to customized baculoviral genomes that are tailored for a range of applications, including synthesizing artificial proteins by genetic code expansion. We review some of these developments, including the ongoing rewiring of the MultiBac system for mammalian applications, notably CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing.
Multiprotein complexes are vital cornerstones of most, if not all, biological processes in cells. To understand the essential mechanisms of these molecular machines, a detailed understanding of their architecture and interactions is required. Several complexes, such as ribosomes, can be purified from native source material in sufficient quality and quantity for structural analysis. Other complexes have low endogenous abundance, impeding their extraction. Heterogeneity can further complicate protein complex purification and structure elucidation. In higher eukaryotes in particular, many complexes can contain distinct subunit isoforms in variable combinations in different tissues. Moreover, the subunit composition can be altered according to cell state. For these complexes, recombinant production and purification by using heterologous host cell systems is typically required.
We encountered this challenge over a decade ago, when working with Tim Richmond in his laboratory at ETH Zürich on multiprotein complexes that control transcription initiation in higher eukaryotes, including humans (reviewed in ). Transcription is central to all biological function, and more than a hundred proteins contribute to its regulation. In humans, many of these are organized in multiprotein complexes with ten or more subunits. Post-translational modifications that may require authentic recapitulation in heterologous expression experiments are likewise prevalent. Moreover, subunits can be very large, with individual molecular weights exceeding 200 kDa. After substantial trial and error, we realized that heterologous expression in Escherichia coli, which dominated recombinant expression then and still is a preferred choice for many today, was unsuitable for the task at hand. We then turned our attention to eukaryotic methods, specifically an expression vector system relying on a recombinant baculovirus, to infect insect cell cultures for producing the complexes in which we had interest.
Baculovirus was originally trialed as a pesticide, to control crop damage caused by Spodoptera frugiperda (the fall armyworm), with limited success initially, although more positive results have recently been reported [2–5]. Subsequently, pioneering work, in particular by Max Summers and colleagues, revealed that baculovirus is useful for very high-level expression of heterologous genes in insect cell laboratory culture (reviewed in [5, 6]). Among the many advantageous features of the baculovirus/insect cell system, the large DNA cargo capacity was particularly notable. Baculovirus, in contrast to other viruses that have a crystalline shell, has a flexible envelope that can grow with increasing size of the genome packaged within the baculovirion without adversely affecting baculovirus function. This particular feature, and the—at least conceptually—relative ease of manipulating baculovirus in the laboratory by non-expert users, was exciting and led us on to the development of MultiBac: a baculovirus/insect cell system specifically engineered for expressing functional multiprotein complexes in the quality and quantity required for high-resolution structural and mechanistic studies [7–11]. MultiBac went on to be broadly adopted and used for research in both industry and academic institutions .
The MultiBac system, and its application to protein complex production, has been described in considerable detail previously [8–11, 13]. In summary, MultiBac consists of an engineered baculoviral genome, which is based on the A. californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV). This genome was previously adapted for propagation and manipulation in bacterial cells in the form of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) [14, 15]. Starting from this BAC, we progressively removed functionalities that we identified experimentally to be detrimental to protein complex production. For instance, proteolytic and apoptotic viral factors were eliminated . Baculovirus infection of insect cells is a lytic process as the virus remodels the host cell machinery for producing baculovirions at high levels, resulting ultimately in cell death and lysis. In fact, the highest level of production of the recombinant protein of interest coincides with the onset of widespread cell lysis, which can compromise the protein produced. The introduced genome alterations resulted in a virus that exhibited delayed lysis of the insect cells, allowing the production of recombinant protein complexes at very high levels while the cells seemingly remained intact .
Accelerating multiprotein complex structural biology
MultiBac evolution: synthetic viral nanosystems
With the Grabherr group in Vienna, we created SweetBac, a SVN designed to tailor the glycosylation pattern of secreted proteins expressed in insect cells [38–41]. By exploiting the viral LoxP site, mammalian glycosylases were integrated into the BAC, which converted the insect-cell-specific high-mannose type glycosylation into the complex sugars associated with human proteins. Conversely, by introducing the deglycosylases PNGase or EndoH, respectively, we created SVNs that entirely removed sugars from the recombinant proteins. This is often preferred for structure elucidation by X-ray crystallography, in which a highly homogenous sample is required, ideally lacking variable extensions, such as sugars, which could impede crystallization. A further post-translational modification that can lead to heterogeneity is phosphorylation, which may or may not be authentic in insect cell expression. In our study of Isw, a chromatin remodeling enzyme complex, we found that the SVN that expresses λ-phosphatase from the viral LoxP site could remove the phosphate groups quantitatively from the recombinant complex, resulting in a highly homogenous sample that could be dissected mechanistically [42, 43].
Following the same logic, further SVNs were developed for improved manufacturing of selected classes of protein biologics of pharmacological interest. Kinases are cornerstones of signal transduction in cells, and many disease states, notably cancer, are caused by malfunction of kinases and their interactions. Small-molecule drugs acting as kinase inhibitors are prolifically used in cancer chemotherapy, and the discovery of new and better kinase inhibitors is a major driving force in oncology research and development. A vital prerequisite to sustain these efforts is the supply of high-quality recombinant kinases for screening and structure-based design approaches. Kinases are often inherently fragile proteins that require helper molecules, such as chaperones, for proper folding during expression. To enhance recombinant production of properly folded and soluble kinases, we designed SVNs that contain up to seven chaperones in the viral LoxP site (Fig. 4). To balance the quantities of individual chaperones produced, we again applied our polyprotein strategy. The resulting “kinase factory” produced previously unobtainable kinases at high levels, in soluble and functional form.
Another class of protein biologics of acute interest are virus-like particles (VLPs), which mimic live viruses but are safe and non-infectious as they lack genetic content. VLPs therefore represent promising candidates for vaccination to combat infectious diseases [44–46]. The influenza M1 capsid is a powerful driver of VLP formation in insect cells. We therefore integrated a gene that expressed M1 from influenza strain H1N1 into the viral LoxP site, together with a gene encoding the fluorescent protein mCherry, which we used to monitor virus performance (Fig. 4). We used this SVN for high-throughput production and validation of an array of influenza VLPs with a large number of immune-modulating mutations in their hemagglutinin (HA) gene .
An unusual application of MultiBac technology involved the generation of recombinant adenovirus associated vector (rAAV) for gene therapy [48–51]. Here, MultiBac was used to provide all components (REP78, REP72, AAV virion coat proteins and the transgenes) required to co-produce gene-therapy-competent rAAVs in Sf9 insect cell cultures. The components spontaneously assemble to form intact rAAVs. The system was used to produce rAAVs encoding leptin, for gene therapy of obesity in laboratory rodents. Although the gene therapy successfully resulted in weight-loss, it was nonetheless noted in the report that best results were achieved when the gene therapy regimen was accompanied with exercise using a tread-mill , somewhat dampening optimism that exercise-free weight loss may be achievable. Originally, this approach involved co-transfection of three individual MultiBac viruses to obtain intact rAAVs, constraining logistics. More recent refinement of the system, including integrating the encoding genes directly into the genome of the host Sf9 cells, resulting in a streamlined manufacturing process representing a viable alternative for rAAV production [48–51].
MultiBacTAG: extending the scope of genetic code expansion
Genetic code expansion (GCE) incorporates artificial amino acids into polypeptide chains to create synthetic proteins with novel functions; it has many applications, ranging from discovery science to molecular medicine [52–54]. In GCE, an orthogonal tRNA/cognate synthetase pair is used to suppress a rare stop codon introduced at a specific site in a gene of interest. The tRNA acts as a stop codon suppressor, effectively repurposing the rare stop codon of choice into a functional sense codon during protein synthesis, which leads to the site-specific incorporation of an artificial amino acid supplemented in the culture medium. A wide range of functionalities from protein labeling to photo-control can be introduced by using GCE in biotechnology and biomedical research [55–57]. Until recently, this method has been mostly confined to small individual proteins, expressed in E. coli or mammalian cells, representing a limited repertoire of cellular activity. Together with the Lemke and Braese groups, we extended the scope of this method by combining GCE with the MultiBac system. This gave rise to MultiBacTAG (Fig. 4), a protein engineering platform that enables GCE in complex multiprotein machines expressed in insect cells .
To customize the MultiBac baculovirus for GCE, the pyrolysyl tRNA/tRNA synthetase (PylRS/tRNAPyl) pair from Methanosarcina mazei was chosen. The gene encoding the synthetase and a cassette for producing tRNAPyl was inserted into the viral LoxP site. The design of the tRNA production cassette proved to be surprisingly complicated. The available insect RNA polymerase III-dependent promoters for RNA production (Bombyx mori U6 and Drosophila melanogaster U6) did not function in the S. frugiperda Sf21 cells that we typically use for MultiBac-based protein production. Overcoming this bottleneck required sequencing the Sf21 genome to identify a Sf21 U6 promoter which supported efficiently the production of M. mazei tRNAPyl , leading to effective rare stop codon suppression and incorporation of artificial amino acids derived from pyrolysine into the proteins expressed with the MultiBacTAG SVN.
Current MultiBacTAG applications include artificial amino acid cross-linking to map interactions in protein complexes, fluorescence labeling of specific targets to measure structure and dynamics in proteins and glycol-engineering proteins compatible with human tissue studies. We anticipate that the platform will also be adopted for custom-design proteins for therapeutic biotechnology and pharmaceutical applications. As an example, we used MultiBacTAG to engineer trastuzumab (also known as Herceptin), an antibody that associates with cancer cells, to recognize breast cancer cells in human tissue [58, 59].
MultiBac-based genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas9
Multigene delivery and subsequent cellular expression is a key technology for a wide range of applications in biology, not only in structural research but also cellular reprogramming and functional pharmaceutical screening. The construction of multigene circuits in mammalian cells is a core concept in synthetic biology and requires efficient delivery of complex heterologous DNA. For certain cell types, including the widely used HEK293 and HeLa cells, this can be achieved by plasmid-based transfection. However, many cell lines, including primary cells, are recalcitrant to plasmid transfection and therefore require a different approach. Baculovirus in its original form is highly selective for infecting insect cells, which is among the reasons why baculovirus/insect cell expression can be carried out at standard laboratory biological safety levels. At very high concentrations, however, baculovirus can also penetrate mammalian cells. This process is called transduction rather than infection as the baculovirus, in contrast to mammalian viral pathogens, will not replicate in mammalian cells. If the baculoviral genome that has been transduced into the mammalian host cell contains an expression cassette with a mammalian cell active promoter, expression of the transgene occurs [60, 61]. This “BacMam” gene delivery approach is attractive owing to the very large DNA cargo capacity of baculovirus. In principle, a single baculovirus can deliver many genes of interest at the same time, a result that is difficult to achieve by plasmid-based co-transfection.
The very large DNA cargo capacity of the baculovirion, and its aptitude to transduce mammalian cells, raises the attractive possibility to use this tool, in conjunction with powerful gene editing technologies, to rectify genetic aberrations, possibly in whole organisms. The gene encoding Cas9 and the modalities to produce guide RNAs and a gene encoding eGFP as a model DNA cargo were integrated into the MultiBacMam system. We showed that this MultiBacMam genome engineering tool could be used for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated insertion of eGFP into the HMG locus of a range of cell types, including neurons . Thus, MultiBacMam can now be developed into a bona fide genome-engineering tool, characterized by an unsurpassed DNA cargo capacity that is orders of magnitude larger than the commonly used gene therapy viral vectors (lentivirus, AAV and adenovirus) that currently dominate the field.
MultiBac Redux: SynBac
The original AcMNPV genome from which the MultiBac is derived contains all the information required for the virus to sustain its life cycle in nature, starting from uptake by the host (the fall armyworm), the infection of midgut cells, followed by massive amplification and release of occluded viral particles when the worm lyses. Many of these functions are dispensable, or even detrimental, in laboratory cell culture. The advent of powerful DNA synthesis and assembly technologies has now made it feasible to “rewire” entire genomes. Genome improvement by eliminating undesired functionalities is a major ambition in current synthetic biology. The baculoviral genome is around 140 kb, which is the size of an average BAC, and within the size that is capable of complete de novo synthesis, as recently shown .
A disadvantage of currently available recombinant baculoviral systems, including MultiBac, is genome instability during virus amplification. The baculovirus progressively eliminates DNA from its genome when serially passaged over several generations, often most severely affecting the heterologous DNA to be expressed [65–67]. In extreme cases, only a few full-size baculoviral genomes are present after several rounds of amplification in cell culture, and small circular DNAs containing tiny fractions of the baculoviral genome dominate. These survive by scavenging on the packaging proteins produced from the full-size specimens, overtaking the viral population. For academic research requiring typically only a few milligrams of protein sample, this can be controlled in a relatively straightforward manner by avoiding virus overamplification [9, 10, 68]. However, this is much more difficult and often impossible to achieve at scales relevant for pharmaceutical manufacturing. Here, large volumes of virus and therefore many cycles of amplification are required to infect fermenter-scale production runs. An improved baculoviral genome resolving this handicap would thus be a major advance.
Conclusion and outlook
The MultiBac system was shown in its first configuration in 2004 , which had been developed to address the challenge of efficient multiprotein complex production for structural biology applications. Subsequently, we received requests from laboratories in both academia and industry exemplifying the need for such a tool-kit, a trend that has not since subsided. The numerous important structures elucidated using MultiBac-produced samples evidenced how useful the system is. We, and others, invested considerable effort over the years to streamline MultiBac, rendering it more user-friendly and accessible, with improvements such as alternative methods for inserting genes of interest.
More recently, the scope of the system has been expanded by customizing the genome for specific applications, as well as altering the tropism of the virus to enable efficient multigene transfer in a wide range of mammalian cell types and organisms. In our view, genomic intervention mediated by nucleases (e.g. Cas9, TALENs and Zinc-fingers), is a particularly promising application. Combining gene editing with the very large (>100 kb) heterologous DNA cargo capacity of baculovirus could be instrumental for future gene therapy applications. We anticipate that next-generation genomic intervention strategies will critically depend on providing complex multicomponent functionalities, including targeting activities and host immune-system modulators in a single multifunctional DNA delivery tool. SynBac, the synthetic baculovirus, could be a tool of choice, providing currently unmatched DNA cargo capacity in an optimized genome.
We thank all members of the Berger laboratory, in particular Deepak Balaji Govinda Raj, for helpful discussions. Kapil Gupta is acknowledged for help with structure representations. Kari Airenne (University of Eastern Finland) kindly provided the schematic drawing of the bacuvirion. We thank Daniel Fitzgerald (Geneva Biotech, Switzerland) and Ismail Moarefi (Crelux GmbH, Germany) for useful comments on the manuscript, and Tim Richmond (ETH Zurich, Switzerland) for encouragement and support at the early stages of the project. This work was supported by the Science Foundation Ireland (grant number 14/IA/3295, to JR) and the European Commission Framework Programme 7 projects SynSignal (contract number 613879, to JR and IB) and ComplexINC (contract number 279039, to IB). The authors acknowledge support by BrisSynBio, a BBSRC/EPSRC funded Centre for synthetic biology at the University of Bristol (BB/L01386X/1).
MP and IB wrote the manuscript together with input from HC, BG, PL and JR. All authors have read and agreed the content.
The authors declare competing financial interest. IB is inventor on international patents (US 61/762.607, EP2403940, EP1723246, EP1945773) covering parts of the MultiBac technology here described.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Gupta K, Sari-Ak D, Haffke M, Trowitzsch S, Berger I. Zooming in on transcription preinitiation. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:2581–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van Beek N, Davis D. Baculovirus insecticide production in insect larvae. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1350:393–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. J Invertebr Pathol. 2015;132:1–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haase S, Sciocco-Cap A, Romanowski V. Baculovirus insecticides in Latin America: historical overview, current status and future perspectives. Viruses. 2015;7:2230–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Summers MD. Milestones leading to the genetic engineering of baculoviruses as expression vector systems and viral pesticides. Adv Virus Res. 2006;68:3–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Oers MM, Pijlman GP, Vlak JM. Thirty years of baculovirus–insect cell protein expression: from dark horse to mainstream technology. J Gen Virol. 2015;96:6–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger I, Poterszman A. Baculovirus expression: old dog, new tricks. Bioengineered. 2015;6:316–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bieniossek C, Imasaki T, Takagi Y, Berger I. MultiBac: expanding the research toolbox for multiprotein complexes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37:49–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bieniossek C, Richmond TJ, Berger I. MultiBac: multigene baculovirus-based eukaryotic protein complex production. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2008;Chapter 5:Unit 5.20.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald DJ, Berger P, Schaffitzel C, Yamada K, Richmond TJ, Berger I. Protein complex expression by using multigene baculoviral vectors. Nat Methods. 2006;3:1021–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger I, Fitzgerald DJ, Richmond TJ. Baculovirus expression system for heterologous multiprotein complexes. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sari D, Gupta K, Thimiri Govinda Raj DB, Aubert A, Drncová P, Garzoni F, et al. The MultiBac baculovirus/insect cell expression vector system for producing complex protein biologics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;896:199–215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trowitzsch S, Bieniossek C, Nie Y, Garzoni F, Berger I. New baculovirus expression tools for recombinant protein complex production. J Struct Biol. 2010;172:45–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luckow VA, Lee SC, Barry GF, Olins PO. Efficient generation of infectious recombinant baculoviruses by site-specific transposon-mediated insertion of foreign genes into a baculovirus genome propagated in Escherichia coli. J Virol. 1993;67:4566–79.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Luckow VA. Baculovirus systems for the expression of human gene products. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1993;4:564–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bieniossek C, Nie Y, Frey D, Olieric N, Schaffitzel C, Collinson I, et al. Automated unrestricted multigene recombineering for multiprotein complex production. Nat Methods. 2009;6:447–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nie Y, Viola C, Bieniossek C, Trowitzsch S, Vijay-Achandran LS, Chaillet M, et al. Getting a grip on complexes. Curr Genomics. 2009;10:558–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vijayachandran LS, Viola C, Garzoni F, Trowitzsch S, Bieniossek C, Chaillet M, et al. Robots, pipelines, polyproteins: enabling multiprotein expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. J Struct Biol. 2011;175:198–208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haffke M, Viola C, Nie Y, Berger I. Tandem recombineering by SLIC cloning and Cre-LoxP fusion to generate multigene expression constructs for protein complex research. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1073:131–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Yang J, Barford D. Recombinant expression and reconstitution of multiprotein complexes by the USER cloning method in the insect cell-baculovirus expression system. Methods. 2016;95:13–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weissmann F, Petzold G, VanderLinden R, Huis In ’t Veld PJ, Brown NG, Lampert F, et al. biGBac enables rapid gene assembly for the expression of large multisubunit protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E2564–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bertipaglia C, Schneider S, Jakobi AJ, Tarafder AK, Bykov YS, Picco A, et al. Higher‐order assemblies of oligomeric cargo receptor complexes form the membrane scaffold of the Cvt vesicle. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:1044–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Geng Y, Mosyak L, Kurinov I, Zuo H, Sturchler E, Cheng TC, et al. Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor. Elife. 2016;5, e13662.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abbas YM, Laudenbach BT, Martínez-Montero S, Cencic R, Habjan M, Pichlmair A, et al. Structure of human IFIT1 with capped RNA reveals adaptable mRNA binding and mechanisms for sensing N1 and N2 ribose 2′-O methylations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E2106–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Luo S, Tong L. Molecular mechanism for the regulation of yeast separase by securin. Nature. 2017;542:255–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gorelik A, Illes K, Heinz LX, Superti-Furga G, Nagar B. Crystal structure of mammalian acid sphingomyelinase. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vos SM, Pöllmann D, Caizzi L, Hofmann KB, Rombaut P, Zimniak T, et al. Architecture and RNA binding of the human negative elongation factor. Elife. 2016;5, e14981.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chao WCH, Murayama Y, Muñoz S, Jones AW, Wade BO, Purkiss AG, et al. Structure of the cohesin loader Scc2. Nat Commun. 2017;8:13952.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hons MT, Huis in ‘t Veld PJ, Kaesler J, Rombaut P, Schleiffer A, Herzog F, et al. Topology and structure of an engineered human cohesin complex bound to Pds5B. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12523.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hunkeler M, Stuttfeld E, Hagmann A, Imseng S, Maier T. The dynamic organization of fungal acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aylett CHS, Sauer E, Imseng S, Boehringer D, Hall MN, Ban N, et al. Architecture of human mTOR complex 1. Science. 2016;351:48–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pflug A, Guilligay D, Reich S, Cusack S. Structure of influenza A polymerase bound to the viral RNA promoter. Nature. 2014;516:355–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reich S, Guilligay D, Pflug A, Malet H, Berger I, Crépin T, et al. Structural insight into cap-snatching and RNA synthesis by influenza polymerase. Nature. 2014;516:361–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lukarska M, Fournier G, Pflug A, Resa-Infante P, Reich S, Naffakh N, et al. Structural basis of an essential interaction between influenza polymerase and Pol II CTD. Nature. 2017;541:117–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hengrung N, El Omari K, Serna Martin I, Vreede FT, Cusack S, Rambo RP, et al. Crystal structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from influenza C virus. Nature. 2015;527:114–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nie Y, Bellon-Echeverria I, Trowitzsch S, Bieniossek C, Berger I. Multiprotein complex production in insect cells by using polyproteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1091:131–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crépin T, Swale C, Monod A, Garzoni F, Chaillet M, Berger I. Polyproteins in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;32:139–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmberger D, Rendic D. SweetBac: Applying MultiBac technology towards flexible modification of insect cell glycosylation. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1321:153–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmberger D, Klausberger M, Berger I, Grabherr R. MultiBac turns sweet. Bioengineered. 2013;4:78–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Trowitzsch S, Palmberger D, Fitzgerald D, Takagi Y, Berger I. MultiBac complexomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2012;9:363–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmberger D, Wilson IBH, Berger I, Grabherr R, Rendic D. SweetBac: a new approach for the production of mammalianised glycoproteins in insect cells. PLoS One. 2012;7, e34226.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fitzgerald DJ, Schaffitzel C, Berger P, Wellinger R, Bieniossek C, Richmond TJ, et al. Multiprotein expression strategy for structural biology of eukaryotic complexes. Structure. 2007;15:275–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamada K, Frouws TD, Angst B, Fitzgerald DJ, DeLuca C, Schimmele K, et al. Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a. Nature. 2011;472:448–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temchura V, Überla K. Intrastructural help: improving the HIV-1 envelope antibody response induced by virus-like particle vaccines. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017;12:272–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeong H, Seong BL. Exploiting virus-like particles as innovative vaccines against emerging viral infections. J Microbiol. 2017;55:220–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Dai S, Wang M, Hu Z, Wang H, Deng F. Virus like particle-based vaccines against emerging infectious disease viruses. Virol Sin. 2016;31:279–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sari-Ak D, Bahrami, D, Laska MJ, Drncova P, Fitzgerald DJ, Schaffitzel D, Garzoni F, Berger I. Production of influenza virus-like particle (VLP) array by using VLP-factoryTM, a MultiBac baculoviral genome customized for enveloped VLP expression. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018; in press.Google Scholar
- Shapiro A, Matheny M, Zhang Y, Tümer N, Cheng K-Y, Rogrigues E, et al. Synergy between leptin therapy and a seemingly negligible amount of voluntary wheel running prevents progression of dietary obesity in leptin-resistant rats. Diabetes. 2008;57:614–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Potter M, Lins B, Mietzsch M, Heilbronn R, Van Vliet K, Chipman P, et al. A simplified purification protocol for recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2014;1:14034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mietzsch M, Grasse S, Zurawski C, Weger S, Bennett A, Agbandje-McKenna M, et al. OneBac: platform for scalable and high-titer production of adeno-associated virus serotype 1-12 vectors for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2014;25:212–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mietzsch M, Hering H, Hammer E-M, Agbandje-McKenna M, Zolotukhin S, Heilbronn R. OneBac 2.0: Sf9 cell lines for production of AAV1, AAV2, and AAV8 vectors with minimal encapsidation of foreign DNA. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2017;28:15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neumann-Staubitz P, Neumann H. The use of unnatural amino acids to study and engineer protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2016;38:119–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malyshev DA, Romesberg FE. The expanded genetic alphabet. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:11930–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nikić I, Lemke EA. Genetic code expansion enabled site-specific dual-color protein labeling: superresolution microscopy and beyond. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2015;28:164–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lemke EA. The exploding genetic code. ChemBioChem. 2014;15:1691–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chin JW. Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code of cells and animals. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:379–408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu CC, Schultz PG. Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:413–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koehler C, Sauter PF, Wawryszyn M, Girona GE, Gupta K, Landry JJM, et al. Genetic code expansion for multiprotein complex engineering. Nat Methods. 2016;13:997–1000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levêque D, Gigou L, Bergerat JP. Clinical pharmacology of trastuzumab. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2008;3:51–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyce FM, Bucher NL. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:2348–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ames RS, Kost TA, Condreay JP. BacMam technology and its application to drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2007;2:1669–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barsoum J, Brown R, McKee M, Boyce FM. Efficient transduction of mammalian cells by a recombinant baculovirus having the vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein. Hum Gene Ther. 1997;8:2011–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansouri M, Bellon-Echeverria I, Rizk A, Ehsaei Z, Cianciolo Cosentino C, Silva CS, et al. Highly efficient baculovirus-mediated multigene delivery in primary cells. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11529.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shang Y, Wang M, Xiao G, Wang X, Hou D, Pan K, et al. Construction and rescue of a functional synthetic baculovirus. ACS Synth Biol. 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00028. Accessed 22 May 2017.Google Scholar
- Pijlman GP, van den Born E, Martens DE, Vlak JM. Autographa californica baculoviruses with large genomic deletions are rapidly generated in infected insect cells. Virology. 2001;283:132–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pijlman GP, Dortmans JCFM, Vermeesch AMG, Yang K, Martens DE, Goldbach RW, et al. Pivotal role of the non-hr origin of DNA replication in the genesis of defective interfering baculoviruses. J Virol. 2002;76:5605–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pijlman GP, van Schijndel JE, Vlak JM. Spontaneous excision of BAC vector sequences from bacmid-derived baculovirus expression vectors upon passage in insect cells. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:2669–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger I, Garzoni F, Chaillet M, Haffke M, Gupta K, Aubert A. The multiBac protein complex production platform at the EMBL. J Vis Exp. 2013;77:e50159.Google Scholar
- Vijayachandran LS, Thimiri Govinda Raj DB, Edelweiss E, Gupta K, Maier J, Gordeliy V, et al. Gene gymnastics: synthetic biology for baculovirus expression vector system engineering. Bioengineered. 2013;4:279–87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar