Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

The mitochondrial HSP90 paralog TRAP1 forms an OXPHOS-regulated tetramer and is involved in mitochondrial metabolic homeostasis

BMC Biology volume 18, Article number: 10 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The molecular chaperone TRAP1, the mitochondrial isoform of cytosolic HSP90, remains poorly understood with respect to its pivotal role in the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism. Most studies have found it to be an inhibitor of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and an inducer of the Warburg phenotype of cancer cells. However, others have reported the opposite, and there is no consensus on the relevant TRAP1 interactors. This calls for a more comprehensive analysis of the TRAP1 interactome and of how TRAP1 and mitochondrial metabolism mutually affect each other.

Results

We show that the disruption of the gene for TRAP1 in a panel of cell lines dysregulates OXPHOS by a metabolic rewiring that induces the anaplerotic utilization of glutamine metabolism to replenish TCA cycle intermediates. Restoration of wild-type levels of OXPHOS requires full-length TRAP1. Whereas the TRAP1 ATPase activity is dispensable for this function, it modulates the interactions of TRAP1 with various mitochondrial proteins. Quantitatively by far, the major interactors of TRAP1 are the mitochondrial chaperones mtHSP70 and HSP60. However, we find that the most stable stoichiometric TRAP1 complex is a TRAP1 tetramer, whose levels change in response to both a decline and an increase in OXPHOS.

Conclusions

Our work provides a roadmap for further investigations of how TRAP1 and its interactors such as the ATP synthase regulate cellular energy metabolism. Our results highlight that TRAP1 function in metabolism and cancer cannot be understood without a focus on TRAP1 tetramers as potentially the most relevant functional entity.

Background

Cells adapt their core metabolism in order to sustain survival in an environment where the availability of oxygen and nutrients can be limiting [1, 2]. In the past few years, TRAP1, the mitochondrial isoform of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), has been recognized as an important modulator of mitochondrial bioenergetics of normal and cancer cells [3,4,5,6]. TRAP1 is directed to the mitochondrial matrix [3, 7, 8] by an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence that is cleaved off upon import [9]. The processed TRAP1 protein is composed of an N-terminal ATPase domain, a middle domain, and a C-terminal dimerization domain; this domain structure is similar to that of cytosolic HSP90 [10], which is the core component of a molecular chaperone machine that is crucial for assisting a large number of “clients” implicated in a wide array of biological processes [11,12,13]. While cytosolic HSP90 has been extensively studied in the past few decades [13], less is known about the biochemical activities of TRAP1 and how they relate to its role in metabolic regulation (see below). Its crystal structure was recently determined, which has helped to understand its ATPase-driven conformational cycle [10, 14,15,16]. However, in contrast to HSP90, whose ATPase cycle and biological activities are modulated by a large cohort of co-chaperones [13, 17], no co-chaperones have been identified for TRAP1. This may be related to its kinship with bacterial Hsp90, which also functions in the absence of co-chaperones.

TRAP1 expression was found in several studies to be inversely correlated with oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and OXPHOS-coupled ATP synthesis in different cell types [3, 4]. These data suggested that TRAP1 is a negative regulator of mitochondrial OXPHOS, but the underlying molecular mechanisms have remained controversial. While TRAP1 had been shown to inhibit complexes II [4] and IV [3] of the electron transport chain by some, it has also been shown to activate complex II [18] and to support OXPHOS [19] by others. Thus, although TRAP1 has been proposed to play a key role in the induction of the Warburg phenotype of cancer cells, conflicting studies [18, 19] clearly call for additional research to understand how TRAP1 regulates the mitochondrial metabolism. A better understanding requires a comprehensive analysis of its interactions with other mitochondrial proteins, in general, and with OXPHOS-associated proteins in particular. Moreover, only a more detailed examination of how TRAP1 and cellular metabolism affect each other will provide sufficient biological insights to evaluate TRAP1 as a potential drug target for the treatment of cancer and other diseases with a metabolic imbalance.

Results

Loss of TRAP1 increases OXPHOS due to an anaplerotic increase in glutamine uptake and metabolism

The gene TRAP1 was disrupted in HEK293T, HCT116, A549, and UMUC3 cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology and the workflow presented in Additional file 1: Figure S1a. To confirm that the TRAP1 knockout (KO) resulted in an increase in mitochondrial respiration, the cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR), which is a measure of mitochondrial respiration, was measured in real time in WT and KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1: Figure S1b). Similar to what we had found with mouse adult fibroblasts (MAFs) [3], the KO increases mitochondrial OCR (Fig. 1b) and OXPHOS-linked ATP production (Fig. 1c) in HEK293T cells grown in medium with all standard carbon sources. An analysis of the energy profile of these cells further showed that although the glycolytic potential of KO cells remained similar to the WT cells (baseline and stressed), the KO made these cells more “aerobic” and dependent upon OXPHOS under normoxic conditions when compared to the WT cells (Fig. 1d). Note that while both HEK293T and HCT116 KO cell lines exhibited increased OCR (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1: Figure S1b), the impact of the KO on OCR is not comparable across the two cell lines, probably because of their different metabolic preferences [20]. The increase in mitochondrial respiration could be suppressed in both HEK293T and HCT116 KO cells by re-introducing TRAP1, but not by overexpressing EGFP directed to the mitochondrial matrix with a TRAP1 mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS) (Fig. 1e, f). The mitochondrial EGFP construct (mitoEGFP) primarily served as a control to verify that overexpression of an unrelated protein in mitochondria did not affect the OXPHOS function. Also note that there is always a slight but statistically insignificant dip in mitochondrial respiration due to transient transfection toxicity (Fig. 1e, f).

Fig. 1
figure1

Real-time metabolic profiling of human TRAP1 KO cells. a Representative real-time traces of basal OCR of WT and TRAP1 KO HEK293T cells with Glc + Pyr + Gln as carbon sources followed by injection of the ATP synthase inhibitor (oligomycin at 5 μM) to block mitochondrial respiration. b, c Quantitation of basal respiration rates (b) and ATP production (c). ATP production is calculated as (last measurement before oligomycin injection) − (minimum rate measured after oligomycin injection). d Comparative energy profiles. The baseline phenotype indicates OCR and ECAR of cells with starting non-limiting assay conditions; the stressed phenotype indicates OCR and ECAR upon exposure to metabolic inhibitors. e, f OCR traces with and without the overexpression of TRAP1 or mitoEGFP in HEK293T KO (e) and HCT116 TRAP1 KO (f) cells. The mitochondrial stress test profile is obtained by sequential injection of oligomycin (5 μM), the uncoupler FCCP (2 μM), and the complex I and III inhibitors rotenone (1 μM) and antimycin A (1 μM), respectively. g–i Comparison of basal OCR of WT and KO HEK293T cells with Glc (g), Pyr (h), and Gln (i) as the only carbon sources. j Flow cytometric quantitation of glucose uptake using 2-NBDG (150 μg/ml) with WT and two independent TRAP1 KO HEK293T clones. k ECAR traces showing basal glycolytic rates of WT and KO HEK293T cells with Glc as the only carbon source before and after the addition of oligomycin. l, m OCR traces of WT and KO HEK293T cells grown in media with Gal + Pyr (l) and Gln (m) as the only carbon sources. All data are reported as means ± SEM (n = 3) with asterisks in the bar graphs indicating statistically significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

We next wanted to identify the differential use of carbon sources underlying this respiratory dysregulation. In the central carbon metabolism, mitochondrial respiration is primarily driven by the three major carbon sources glucose (Glc), pyruvate (Pyr), and glutamine (Gln), all present in a standard growth medium. The OCRs of WT and KO cells incubated separately with each of the three carbon sources were therefore determined (Fig. 1g–i).

When grown only on glucose as the primary carbon source, an uptake assay with the fluorescent tracer 2-NBDG showed that HEK293T KO cells have a lower Glc uptake than WT cells (Fig. 1j). Consistent with this, they display a reduced OCR (Fig. 1g) and rate of extracellular acidification (ECAR), caused by lactate secretion, a measure of the glycolytic flux (Fig. 1k).

To maintain a minimal glycolytic rate and to promote pyruvate oxidation in mitochondria, WT and KO cells were grown overnight in a medium containing galactose and pyruvate (Gal + Pyr) as the only carbon sources [21]. Under these conditions, the ECAR profile tends to mimic the OCR profile because the carbon sources are primarily used for OXPHOS and the acidification comes from the carbonic acid produced with the CO2 released by OXPHOS (compare Fig. 1l with Additional file 1: Figure S1c, and panels d and e of Additional file 1: Figure S1e). Real-time respiration monitoring showed that the basal OCR in both HEK293T (Fig. 1l, h) and HCT116 KO cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1d) is decreased, indicating an overall decrease in the assimilation of pyruvate into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. A separate OCR analysis with only pyruvate as the carbon source gave similar results demonstrating that this outcome was not due to a galactose-induced artifact (Additional file 1: Figure S1f). In contrast, OCR analysis with only Gln as the primary carbon source (Fig. 1m, i; Additional file 1: Figure S1 g) indicated a metabolic preference of KO cells for Gln. This may compensate for the reduced Glc or Pyr metabolism and indicate an anaplerotic shift, which is the replenishment of TCA cycle intermediates diverted to various biosynthetic pathways [22], in this case by the increased utilization of Gln. Similarly to Pyr alone, the ECAR profiles with only Gln mimicked the OCR profiles of both HEK293T and HCT116 cells, which indicates that Gln is also primarily metabolized in mitochondria in both cell types (Additional file 1: Figure S1 h, i).

To confirm the increased Gln uptake and utilization by KO cells, indicated by the OCR experiments, a quantitative flux tracing experiment was performed. For this, isotopically labeled Gln (13C-Gln) was added in addition to unlabeled Glc and Pyr as carbon sources (Additional file 2: Figure S2a-c and Additional file 3: Table S1 for absolute quantitation of metabolites; for 13C tracing in metabolites, see the NEI area tab in Additional file 4: Table S2). For the quantitation of metabolites, we focused on the ones with increased 13C abundance in KO cells. Both HEK293T and A549 KO cells exhibited a significant increase in total Gln and glutamate concentrations (Fig. 2a), further confirming that KO cells prefer Gln even in the presence of the other two major carbon sources (Glc and Pyr). This is also associated with an increase in the levels of traced TCA cycle intermediates (Fig. 2b) indicating that KO cell metabolism is indeed anaplerotic: the increased Gln uptake and utilization allows the replenishment of TCA cycle metabolites. This correlates with an increased sensitivity of the KO cells to the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 (Fig. 2c). We further extended the metabolomic comparison to 42 different quantitated metabolites (Additional file 2: Figure S2 in conjunction with the NEI area tab in Additional file 4: Table S2) and also observed a notable increase in 13C-traced reduced glutathione (GSH) in both HEK293T and A549 KO cells (Fig. 2d). This may indicate an adjustment to cope with increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are often associated with increased OXPHOS [3, 23].

Fig. 2
figure2

Absolute quantitation of traced metabolites in WT and KO cells. a Quantitation of total glutamine and glutamate levels. b Quantitation of TCA cycle metabolites. c Sensitivity of WT and KO HEK293T cells to the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839, see the “Materials and methods” section for experimental details. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean for three independent experiments. d Quantitation of reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) in WT and KO HEK293T and A549 cells. The absolute quantitation shown is for metabolites with increased 13C abundance from labeled glutamine (see data in Additional file 4: Table S2). Data points on bar graphs of a, b, and d indicate metabolite concentration per 106 cells from each biological replicate (n = 2)

Full size image

Full-length TRAP1 but not its ATPase activity is essential to regulate OXPHOS

We next investigated which parts and functions of TRAP1 are necessary to rescue the metabolic phenotype of KO cells. With our initial set of truncation mutants, we set out to test whether any of the three major domains of TRAP1, which is the N-terminal ATPase domain (N), the middle (M) or C-terminal (C) domains, or combinations, thereof could be sufficient. We designed a custom construct to express TRAP1 variants with a C-terminal HA tag and an N-terminal TRAP1-MTS to ensure that proteins are directed into the mitochondrial matrix (Additional file 5: Figure S3a). mitoEGFP was used as a control (Additional file 5: Figure S3b). As mentioned previously, this construct was used to test whether overexpression of an unrelated protein in mitochondria might non-specifically disrupt the OXPHOS function (Figs. 1e, f and 3a–d). All TRAP1 truncation mutants as well as the full-length protein were expressed with some exhibiting bands corresponding to precursor proteins with uncleaved MTS and to shorter ones due to N-terminal cleavage (Additional file 5: Figure S3c). The TRAP1 truncation mutants were then overexpressed in the HEK293T KO cells to determine OCR profiles in the presence of all three carbon sources (Fig. 3a, c). Once again, the OCR data with the mitoEGFP controls confirm a slight reduction in mitochondrial respiration due to transient transfection toxicity (Figs. 1e, f, and 3a, c). However, the slightly lower OCR of cells transfected with the control plasmid expressing mitoEGFP was still significantly higher when compared to the OCR of cells transfected with the WT TRAP1 expression plasmid (Fig. 3b, d). None of the TRAP1 truncation mutants were able to suppress the KO OXPHOS phenotype to WT levels (Fig. 3 b, d). This indicates that a full-length TRAP1 protein is essential for normal OXPHOS regulation.

Fig. 3
figure3

Analysis of the TRAP1 structure activity relationship for metabolic regulation. a OCR traces of WT versus KO HEK293T cells exogenously expressing the control proteins mitoEGFP or WT TRAP1, or the TRAP1 truncation mutants MTS-N, MTS-M, and MTS-C. b Quantitation of the basal respiration rates of WT versus KO HEK293T cells expressing the indicated proteins. c OCR traces; experiments as in a, but with the TRAP1 truncation mutants MTS-N+M and MTS-M+C. d Quantitation of the basal respiration rates of WT versus KO cells expressing the indicated proteins. e–h OCR traces of WT versus KO HEK293T cells overexpressing WT TRAP1 (e), the ATPase mutants E115A/R402A (f), ΔSTRAP (g), or D158N (h). i Quantitation of the basal respiration rates of WT versus KO HEK293T cells expressing the indicated proteins. ns, difference statistically not significant. j OCR traces with WT and KO MAFs and MAF KO cells exogenously expressing either WT TRAP1 or the TRAP1 low ATPase mutant E115A. All data are reported as means ± SEM (n = 3) with asterisks indicating statistically significant differences between the compared groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

Since TRAP1 is a paralog of HSP90, a molecular chaperone that is well known to be dependent on its ATPase cycle [24, 25], we speculated that the ATPase activity of TRAP1 might be required for OXPHOS regulation. To test this, we generated a panel of point and truncation mutants that affect this enzymatic activity. Note that our numbering includes the 59 amino acids of the MTS. The following ATPase activity mutants were tested: the double point mutant E115A/R402A with a 10-fold reduced ATPase activity relative to WT (Additional file 5: Figure S3d), the 30-fold hyperactive ATPase mutant ΔStrap, and the moderately activated (2.5-fold) ATPase single point mutant D158N [14]. To our surprise, all ATPase mutants are able to suppress the OXPHOS phenotype of the KO cells, reducing the OCR to WT levels (Fig. 3e–i). Similar results were obtained when the OCR analysis was done with cells in a medium with only Gln as the carbon source (Additional file 5: Figure S3e). We further confirmed the ATPase independence of the complementation by performing a separate real-time OCR analysis with murine cells comparing KO MAFs stably expressing either WT or the single point mutant E115A of human TRAP1 (Fig. 3j). Note that the mutant E115A was designed by analogy to the yeast HSP90 E33A mutant, which has been reported to be able to bind to ATP, but to be defective for ATP hydrolysis [24, 26]; E115A, similarly to the single mutant mentioned above, binds ATP, but is defective for ATP hydrolysis [15]. Thus, the ability to hydrolyze ATP, at least as well as WT TRAP1, is not essential for the regulation of OXPHOS by TRAP1.

TRAP1 primarily interacts with other mitochondrial chaperones and OXPHOS-associated proteins

While HSP90 has an exhaustive list of clients and co-chaperones [13, 27,28,29,30], the interactome of its mitochondrial paralog remains poorly characterized [6]. After ascertaining that a full-length TRAP1 is essential for OXPHOS regulation, we wondered which proteins interact with TRAP1 and whether these might explain its role in OXPHOS regulation.

We carried out an immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IP-MS) experiment with WT TRAP1 and the ATPase mutants E115A/R402A and ΔStrap overexpressed in HEK293T cells (Additional file 6: Figure S4a; Additional file 7: Table S3). To refine this list of identified proteins, the protein interactors were first filtered for validated mitochondrial proteins and then by limiting the dataset to proteins with 4 or more identified unique peptides. This yielded a list of 81 proteins common to WT TRAP1 and the 2 ATPase mutants; we took these to represent the most probable TRAP1 interactors (Additional file 8: Table S4). This list primarily contains other mitochondrial chaperones (for example GRP75, CH60, and PHB, which are also known as mtHSP70/mortalin, HSP60, and prohibitin, respectively), OXPHOS complex subunits (ATP synthase, complexes I and IV), channel/carrier proteins (TOM/TIM complexes, VDACs), and other mitochondrial enzymes (YMEL1, FAS, ECHA). It is noteworthy that, while we could detect the previously reported TRAP1 interactors SDHA [4, 31], COX4, ATPB, and NDUA9 [19], we did not see others including cyclophilin D [32], PINK1 [33], c-Src [3], HTRA2 [34], and SIRT3 [19] (Additional file 7: Table S3). This may be due to the differences in cell lines, relative affinities, interactor-directed IPs, or other experimental details. More unexpectedly, we did not find any enzymes directly involved in Gln metabolism, such as glutaminase, glutamine synthase, and glutamate dehydrogenase. Note that as a consequence of a decline in Glc and Pyr metabolism, the fluctuating ADP to ATP ratios in KO cells may act as a potent activator of glutaminase to fuel the TCA cycle [35, 36]. ADP has been reported to be the strongest nucleotide activator of glutaminase [35], but ATP, both at low and high concentrations, also stimulates glutaminase activity [36].

For further analysis, we used the total peptide spectral matches (PSM, a metric based on the total number of identified peptides for a given protein), to standardize and to compare the data from IPs with WT and mutant TRAP1. Once standardized to WT, interactors of individual TRAP1 mutants could be compared among themselves and as a ratio to the respective TRAP1 versions (set to 100). It is striking that TRAP1-interacting proteins segregate into two major groups based on how much protein was pulled down with WT or mutant TRAP1 (Fig. 4a, Additional file 8: Table S4). Quantitatively, the mitochondrial chaperones GRP75 (mtHSP70), CH60 (HSP60), and PHB2 are the main TRAP1 interactors while all other interactors segregate into the second less abundant group (Fig. 4a, inset).

Fig. 4
figure4

TRAP1 proteomics. a Comparative relative abundance of proteins immunoprecipitated with the indicated TRAP1 ATPase mutants. The scatter plot shows the 81 proteins common to WT TRAP1 and the 2 ATPase mutants; it was constructed with an average of normalized PSM values (TRAP1 itself was set to 100) to compare the interactomes of TRAP1 mutants E115A/R402A with low ATPase activity (Y-axis) and the hyperactive ATPase mutant ΔStrap (X-axis); the bigger the distance from the origin on either axis, the more binding there is. Proteins with low PSM values were not necessarily identified in all 3 replicates for a given TRAP1 mutant. The dashed red arrow connects the area near the origin of the plot to the zoomed out inset. b Relative quantitation of protein binding to the TRAP1 mutants E115A/R402A and ΔStrap based on log2 ratios of normalized PSM values. Proteins above the X-axis interact more with the mutant E115A/R402A than the mutant ΔStrap. The list of 81 common proteins is reduced to 61 for this analysis since only proteins identified in at least 2 replicates for each TRAP1 mutant were included. c Volcano plot showing up- or downregulated mitochondrial proteins in a comparison of WT and TRAP1 KO UMUC3 cells. These data are based on the SILAC analysis of the whole cell proteome filtered for mitochondrial proteins (200 proteins found in all three replicates in both WT and KO cells)

Full size image

Consistent with what has been observed for yeast HSP90 by a two-hybrid screen [37], most of the TRAP1 interactors, except the major mitochondrial chaperones mtHSP70 (GRP75) and HSP60 (CH60), have a preference for binding the TRAP1 mutant E115A/R402A, which has a tenfold reduced ATPase activity and might therefore accumulate in the ATP-bound conformation (Fig. 4b, Additional file 8: Table S4). This preference for the ATP-bound state could also be seen when low and hyperactive ATPase mutants were individually compared to WT TRAP1 (Additional file 6: Figure S4b, c).

Taken together, these results show that while the ATPase activity of TRAP1 can vary greatly without affecting OXPHOS regulation and interaction with other mitochondrial chaperones, TRAP1 ATPase activity is inversely correlated with binding to other TRAP1 interactors.

Loss of TRAP1 has a minor impact on mitochondrial and total cellular proteomes

We speculated that the absence of TRAP1 might destabilize some of its interactors or lead to a compensatory transcriptional or post-transcriptional up- or downregulation of other proteins. We used 2 separate approaches to identify such proteome changes. First, we performed a quantitative stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) MS analysis comparing WT to KO UMUC3 cells. Almost 50% of the mitochondrial proteome (507 proteins) could be detected, of which 200 were detected in all replicates (Additional file 9: Table S5). For these 200 proteins, we found little variations comparing KO to WT cells when the minimum significant fold change is set to 2 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4c). Even with a cutoff of 1.5-fold, only a few alterations in the mitochondrial proteome could be seen (Fig. 4c, Additional file 9: Table S5). With the notable exception of PHB2 (when a 1.5-fold change is set as a threshold), most of the mitochondrial proteins including those predicted to interact with TRAP1 (especially the subunits of the ATP synthase complex highlighted by the analysis in Fig. 4b), show no significant up- or downregulation in UMUC3 KO cells (Additional file 9: Table S5). Thus, TRAP1 KO does not have a significant impact on the portion (about 15–20%) of the mitochondrial proteome that our SILAC analysis could capture.

Second, we did a label-free quantitation (LFQ) MS analysis of the total cellular proteome with WT and KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells cultured with the 3 different cocktails of carbon sources (Glc + Pyr + Gln, Gal + Pyr only, Gln only; Additional file 10: Table S6). We reduced the initial list of 4578 proteins to 3679 proteins by using as a criterion the identification of at least 4 unique peptides per protein (Additional file 11: Table S7). The comparison of the LFQKO/LFQWT ratios for these proteins from cells cultured in a medium with all 3 carbon sources did not reveal any significant changes (Additional file 6: Figure S4d, e). Although a few proteins were observed outside the 2-fold limit, they were not consistent across HEK293T and HCT116 cells and therefore failed to correlate with the loss of TRAP1. The LFQ ratio profiles turned out to be similar for media with other combinations of carbon sources (Additional file 11: Table S7).

In toto, all three MS experiments indicated that while TRAP1 interacts with multiple mitochondrial proteins, its loss does not have much of an impact on the mitochondrial or cellular proteomes.

TRAP1 forms an oligomeric complex

Our IP-MS experiment suggested that TRAP1 associates with a number of proteins of the mitochondrial matrix in a manner independent of its own ATPase activity. To explore this further, we decided to separate mitochondrial extracts made with a non-ionic detergent from HEK293T cells on clear native polyacrylamide gels (native PAGE) capable of resolving molecular complexes between 1 MDa and 240 kDa (Fig. 5a). For the following experiments, we chose clear native rather than blue native PAGE [38] because with the latter, although possibly better suited for membrane-associated complexes, there is always the risk that the surface coating with the negatively charged Coomassie dye affects the integrity or stability of protein complexes. Overall, despite the slightly poorer resolution compared to blue native gels, clear native gels have been demonstrated to yield largely comparable results, notably for mitochondrial complexes [39]. We expected the migration of complexes with a protein such as TRAP1 with a pI of 6.40 in a separating gel at pH 8.8 to be reasonably well correlated with molecular weight and size. When blotted for endogenous TRAP1, a single molecular complex of ~ 300 kDa could be seen, which is absent from KO cells (Fig. 5a). However, the molecular weight of the detected complex was not exactly what was expected if a TRAP1 dimer was in a complex with mtHSP70, HSP60, or even both proteins. Moreover, looking at overexpressed WT or ATPase mutant TRAP1 side by side, we found that the E115A/R402A mutant forms a complex of the same size as WT TRAP1 whereas the hyperactive ATPase mutant (ΔStrap) seems to form a slightly larger or conformationally different, more slowly migrating complex (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5
figure5

Analysis of the TRAP1 complex with native gels and cryo-EM. a Immunoblot of a native protein gel (NATIVE PAGE) showing TRAP1 complexes in mitochondrial extracts of WT versus KO HEK293T cells, and KO cells overexpressing WT TRAP1 or the TRAP1 mutants E115A/R402A or ΔStrap. Note that the ΔStrap mutant forms a slightly larger complex when compared to the others. The immunoblot was probed with a TRAP1 antibody. A parallel immunoblot was performed on the same samples under denaturing conditions (10% SDS PAGE) to check the expression levels of TRAP1. HSP60 and mtHSP70 were used as positive and GAPDH as negative controls to check the quality of the mitochondrial extracts. b Immunoblot of a native gel analysis to compare the complexes formed by wild-type (WT) endogenous TRAP1 and the indicated overexpressed tagged versions of TRAP1. Note that no TRAP1 dimer is detectable at steady state under any condition. All native gel immunoblots were probed with a TRAP1 antibody, and a parallel immunoblot under denaturing conditions (7.5% SDS PAGE) was also performed to check TRAP1 levels. HSP60 and GAPDH served as positive and negative controls, respectively, to check the quality of the mitochondrial extracts. c Immunoblot of a blue native protein gel (3–12%) comparing recombinant TRAP1 (20 and 5 ng) and endogenous TRAP1 in a mitochondrial extract (60 and 90 μg) from HEK293T cells. The positions of tetramers and dimers are indicated. Note that the markers used for clear and blue native gels are different (see the “Materials and methods” section) and that the Coomassie dye coating can differentially affect the migration of protein and protein complexes. d Representative cryo-EM reference-free 2D averaged classes of nucleotide-bound recombinant human TRAP1, showing both dimer and tetramer (red squares) populations. e Proposed 3D model for the TRAP1 tetramer in the nucleotide-bound closed state. Protomers in the first dimer are colored yellow and orange. Protomers in the second dimer are colored blue and cyan. The inset within the red square is a 2D projection of the proposed TRAP1 tetramer model with 10 Å low-pass filtering. The projection matched with the experimental 2D class average is highlighted in the red squares in b

Full size image

To determine what the 300-kDa TRAP1 complex contains, we expressed a TRAP1-GST fusion protein and GST alone as a negative control and applied the workflow described in Additional file 12: Figure S5a for a GST-pulldown MS analysis. Upon setting the cutoff for an interactor at a minimum of 11 unique peptides, no mitochondrial chaperone could be detected in the excised gel piece. Apart from TRAP1, only proteins that were also co-purified with GST alone could be identified (Additional file 12: Figure S5b; Additional file 13: Table S8). Hence, the high-molecular weight TRAP1 complex (~ 400 kDa in the case of TRAP1-GST) only contains TRAP1-GST. The TRAP1 interactors mtHSP70 and HSP60 may not be sufficiently stably bound to remain associated during native gel electrophoresis. The sizes of the TRAP1 and TRAP1-GST complexes are consistent with TRAP1 forming a stable tetramer or a dimer of dimers. We were concerned that the specific mitochondrial lysis conditions could contribute to generating this unexpected TRAP1 complex; however, we observed the same complex independently of whether we prepared the mitochondrial extract without or with reducing agent and without or with any one of 3 different detergents (Additional file 12: Figure S5c).

Our results showing the existence of a previously unreported TRAP1 oligomeric complex, in all likelihood a TRAP1 tetramer, were quite surprising considering that structural [10, 15] and crosslinking [40] studies had only reported TRAP1 to exist as a dimer. To determine whether the dimer and tetramer co-exist at a steady state in mitochondria without crosslinking, we compared endogenous TRAP1 to our panel of full-length TRAP1 proteins with different tags using a clear native gel analysis capable of resolving complexes from 480 to ~ 120 kDa (Fig. 5b). We expected homodimers to migrate at the level of the 146 kDa or between the 146- and 242-kDa marker bands. Although all protomers were well expressed (Fig. 5b, lower panel with SDS gels), we did not observe any band that could correspond to TRAP1 dimers at steady state, neither with endogenous TRAP1 nor upon overexpression of TRAP1 (Fig. 5b).

We next set out to confirm the existence of TRAP1 tetramers with two orthogonal methods comparing endogenous mitochondrial TRAP1 to recombinant human TRAP1, which we purified from Escherichia coli. We reasoned that a biochemical analysis such as a blue native PAGE [38], different from what had previously been done with recombinant TRAP1, might allow us to corroborate the existence of TRAP1 tetramers with TRAP1 from an entirely different source and devoid of all other proteins present in a mitochondrial extract. Thus, we compared the migration of endogenous TRAP1 present in a mitochondrial extract of HEK293T cells with that of small amounts of purified recombinant TRAP1 by blue native PAGE. Remarkably, in both cases, some fraction of TRAP1 migrated as a large complex consistent with tetramers (Fig. 5c). Whereas the majority of recombinant TRAP1 molecules migrated as a faster complex consistent with homodimers, the ratio was more or less inverted for TRAP1 from a mitochondrial source. The slight differences in migration between TRAP1 from the two sources might be due to technical reasons relating to the vastly different amounts of total protein loaded on the gel or to post-translational modifications of the mitochondrial protein not present in TRAP1 purified from bacteria.

We further employed a single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with the same recombinant material as an additional method to demonstrate the existence of a TRAP1 tetramer and to visualize its conformation. The N-terminally closed state of TRAP1 was stabilized using the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog AMPPNP. A total of 665 micrographs were collected, from which 192,583 particles were selected. Reference-free 2D class averages revealed both TRAP1 dimer and tetramer populations (Fig. 5d). While the TRAP1 dimer can adopt different orientations, the TRAP1 tetramers were captured in a single view; this very strongly preferred orientation for the TRAP1 tetramer prevented us from pursuing its 3D structure. Nevertheless, the cryo-EM data clearly showed that TRAP1 can exist as a tetramer, even though cryo-EM conditions predominantly showed the dimer (~ 80%). As expected, the conformations for both TRAP1 dimer and tetramer shown in Fig. 5d are the closed state. Interestingly, our current model suggests that a TRAP1 tetramer might be formed by the orthogonal association of 2 dimers (Fig. 5e). These experiments neither support nor rule out the existence of TRAP1 tetramers in the apo (without nucleotide) and open (for example, ADP-bound) states, which are too flexible to be readily visualized using cryo-EM. It is noteworthy that the relative proportion of tetramers versus dimers for the same recombinant protein preparation is consistent between the two methods we have employed, that is blue native PAGE and cryo-EM. For endogenous mitochondrial TRAP1, the blue native gel indicates that the tetramer, even under these specific experimental conditions, may be the predominant form (Fig. 5c), an oligomeric form that might be preserved and further favored by our clear native PAGE method (see the “Discussion” section).

The TRAP1 complex is induced in response to OXPHOS perturbations

Based on the hypothesis that an oligomerized complex might be the functional entity of TRAP1, we checked its levels when OXPHOS is inhibited with a prolonged exposure of HEK293T cells to hypoxia in various media (Fig. 6a). Although the baseline levels of the TRAP1 complex vary in cells adapted to different carbon sources in normoxia (left part of Fig. 6a), we saw a consistent increase in the levels of the TRAP1 complex when cells were placed in hypoxia. It is notable that the maximum increase in the levels of the TRAP1 complex was observed with cells grown in Gal + Pyr medium when they were exposed to hypoxia (Fig. 6a). Cells with this carbon source combination exclusively rely on OXPHOS for respiration (Additional file 1: Figure S1, compare panels d and e). Considering that the ATP synthase is one of the major OXPHOS complexes that is inhibited by prolonged hypoxia [41] and that we had found ATP synthase components to be among the main TRAP1 interactors (see Fig. 4b), we asked whether the inhibition of the ATP synthase complex would affect TRAP1 oligomerization (Fig. 6b). To this end, we compared the levels of the TRAP1 complex from HEK293T cells exposed to hypoxia or to the ATP synthase inhibitor oligomycin under normoxic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, the induction of the TRAP1 complex is slow and only seems to initiate around 6 h (Fig. 6b). The slow time course may reflect the slow depletion of oxygen from the medium and cells rather than a characteristic of mitochondria or the TRAP1 complex. There is also an overall increase in the levels of TRAP1 protomers in cells exposed to hypoxia (Fig. 6b, middle panel with SDS-PAGE), but this induction does not appear to be HIF1α-mediated (Additional file 14: Figure S6a). In contrast, oligomycin induces a more rapid accumulation of the TRAP1 complex above basal level without a noticeable concomitant increase in total TRAP1 protein levels (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure6

The TRAP1 complex is induced by OXPHOS inhibition. a Immunoblot of a native gel analysis of TRAP1 complexes from HEK293T cells grown with different carbon sources under normoxia or hypoxia (1% O2) overnight. Lower panel: graphical representation of the levels of the TRAP1 complex shown in the upper panels; band intensities were quantitated using ImageJ. b Immunoblot of a native gel analysis of TRAP1 complexes from cells subjected to hypoxia (1% O2) or an oligomycin (10 μM) treatment in parallel (in normoxia) for 2, 4, 6, and 8 h. The lower panel shows the quantitation. All quantitations with ImageJ shown are for a single native gel; similar results were obtained in three independent experiments

Full size image

All of the experiments presented so far regarding the TRAP1 complex were performed solely with HEK293T cells. We therefore confirmed the existence and inducibility of the TRAP1 complex in four other cell lines: breast cancer-derived cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-134, the prostate cancer cell line PC3, and the colon cancer cell line HCT116. A high-molecular weight TRAP1 complex, which is rapidly further induced in response to ATP synthase inhibition, was readily detected in each cell line (Additional file 14: Figure S6b).

Next, we assessed the impact of inhibitors of the electron transport chain (ETC) on the TRAP1 complex in MCF-7 and HEK293T cells (Fig. 7a and Additional file 15: Figure S7). Both cell lines showed an accumulation of the TRAP1 complex when the ATP synthase was compromised (Fig. 7a and Additional file 15: Figure S7). In contrast to the inhibition of the ATP synthase complex (complex V of the ETC), the inhibition of complexes I or III or both reduced the TRAP1 complex levels in both cell lines (Fig. 7a and Additional file 15: Figure S7). Therefore, we tested whether the inhibition of ATP synthase could override the effects of complex I and III inactivation (Fig. 7b). This was examined at the 3 and 6 h time points with a combination of rotenone + antimycin A and oligomycin + rotenone + antimycin A in parallel. Indeed, the inhibition of ATP synthase was able to override the suppressive effect of the combined inhibition of complexes I and III on the TRAP1 complex in HEK293T cells, as can be most clearly seen at the 6 h time point (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7
figure7

TRAP1 complexes with inhibition and induction of OXPHOS. a Immunoblot of a native gel analysis of TRAP1 complexes from MCF-7 cells upon inhibition of OXPHOS at different steps. The lower panel shows the quantitation (dotted green lines only serve to indicate the baseline without treatment). b Immunoblot of a native gel analysis of TRAP1 complexes from HEK293T cells upon inhibition of OXPHOS at different steps alone and in combination. c ECAR profiles of HEK293T cells treated with OXPHOS inhibitors (ORA, cocktail of oligomycin, rotenone, and antimycin) with or without an LDH inhibitor (LDHi, 5 μM). d OCR profile of HEK293T cells treated with OXPHOS inhibitors (ORA, cocktail of oligomycin, rotenone, and antimycin) with or without an LDH inhibitor (LDHi, 5 μM). e Immunoblot of a native gel analysis of TRAP1 complexes from HEK293T cells treated with LDHi for 2, 4, and 6 h

Full size image

Having found that the levels of the TRAP1 complex change upon inhibiting OXPHOS, we wondered what would happen if OXPHOS were upregulated. This question is not trivial to address experimentally as it appears that most cells in culture operate OXPHOS at or close to maximal capacity. We decided to culture HEK293T cells on glucose as the only carbon source and then to force them to divert pyruvate to OXPHOS by blocking its conversion to lactate with a lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor (LDHi) (Fig. 7c). This treatment increased the basal OCR of HEK293T cells by more than twofold compared to the low basal value of cells grown with glucose as the only carbon source (Fig. 7d). When the cells were treated for 2, 4, or 6 h with the LDHi under this condition, we observed a steady increase in the induction of the TRAP1 complex (Fig. 7e). Thus, the TRAP1 complex can be induced both in response to inhibition of OXPHOS at the level of ATP synthase and to an increase of OXPHOS.

Discussion

The role of TRAP1 in the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism had remained controversial. Here, we provide new insights that should help clarify the impact of TRAP1 on cellular energy metabolism and, conversely, on how changes in cellular metabolism affect TRAP1 itself. In most cell lines grown in rich medium, the primary phenotype of a loss of TRAP1 function is an increase in mitochondrial respiration and ATP production [6]. Based on a limited metabolomics analysis, we had previously speculated that the increase in OXPHOS in TRAP1-deficient cells is anaplerotic [3]. By using CRISPR/Cas9-generated TRAP1 KO cell lines, OCR experiments with restricted carbon sources, and metabolomics, we have discovered that the increase in OXPHOS in TRAP1 KO cells is a consequence of stimulated Gln metabolism. The anaplerotic metabolism of TRAP1 KO cells itself might be a compensatory response to a decline in glucose uptake and pyruvate assimilation into the TCA cycle under normoxic conditions. Why cellular glucose uptake and mitochondrial pyruvate utilization are reduced in the absence of TRAP1 remains to be elucidated. Interestingly, the increase in Gln metabolism of TRAP1 KO cells is also channeled into the synthesis of GSH, possibly to buffer the increased ROS produced as a consequence of upregulated OXPHOS [3, 31, 42].

Surprisingly, we could not find any evidence of an interaction between TRAP1 and the enzymes directly involved in Gln metabolism in our TRAP1 IP-MS data, even though we had observed that TRAP1 KO cells grown in Gln only medium are more sensitive to the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 than WT cells. Glutaminase activity has previously been shown to be stimulated by ATP [36] and even more strongly by ADP [35]. Therefore, we speculate that the increase in the ADP/ATP ratio associated with the decline in glucose and pyruvate metabolism in TRAP1 KO cells provides a strong stimulus for the activation of mitochondrial glutaminase resulting in a re-equilibrated ADP/ATP ratio. Unfortunately, at present, there is no experimental means to measure glutaminase activity in real time as a function of ADP or ATP levels in live cells.

Our efforts to understand how TRAP1 functions as a negative regulator of mitochondrial OXPHOS in normoxia show that the restoration of properly regulated, wild-type levels of OXPHOS requires full-length TRAP1. While this is not surprising, it was unexpected that the ATPase activity of TRAP1 does not correlate with its ability to restore OXPHOS to WT levels. This finding strongly suggests that the ATPase activity of TRAP1 is not essential for OXPHOS regulation. This is reminiscent of relatively recent findings with cytosolic HSP90 indicating that the rate of ATP hydrolysis does not correlate with the ability of this molecular chaperone to support yeast viability [43], while ATP binding is absolutely essential [24, 26, 43]. Similarly, some activities of the bacterial form of HSP90, HtpG, do not depend on its ATPase activity [44]. In the case of TRAP1, it was not possible to test whether ATP binding per se, even without hydrolysis, is essential for TRAP1 to regulate OXPHOS. As of today, there is no TRAP1 point mutant that is functionally equivalent to the yeast HSP90 mutant D79N, which abolishes ATP binding [24, 26]. Studies on substitutions of D158, the corresponding amino acid of TRAP1, have yielded conflicting results [14, 45], although the observation that the ATPase activity of D158N is several folds greater than that of WT [14] implicitly proves that this particular mutant can still bind ATP.

Whereas the rate of TRAP1 ATP hydrolysis does not influence its role in OXPHOS regulation, the TRAP1 IP-MS data described in this study show that the ATP hydrolysis rate does affect TRAP1 interactions with other non-chaperone proteins. While the binding of major TRAP1 interactors such as the molecular chaperones mtHSP70 and HSP60 remains unaffected by the ATPase activity of TRAP1, the binding of most non-chaperone interactors, similarly to what has been reported for cytosolic HSP90 interactors [43], is inversely correlated with TRAP1 ATPase activity.

Cytosolic HSP90, with its large clientele of proteins, is a major network hub in the cellular proteome; as a result, pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 greatly destabilizes the cellular proteome [46,47,48,49,50,51]. This is in stark contrast to what we found for TRAP1, whose loss does not cause a significant imbalance in either the mitochondrial or cellular proteomes. Even the highest confidence TRAP1 interactors such as ATP synthase remain unaffected. Probably, the most notable change in TRAP1 KO cells is the increase in mitochondrial SOD2 protein levels. This may be a secondary response to the increase in GSH levels to reduce the oxidative stress that is a direct consequence of increased OXPHOS in TRAP1 KO cells.

Since the major goal of this study was to understand how TRAP1 regulates OXPHOS, we chose to focus on TRAP1 interactors that did not differentially segregate between the ATPase mutants in our IP-MS analysis. This category of interactors includes mtHSP70 and HSP60 as the main interactors of TRAP1. Since cytosolic and bacterial HSP90 work as a chaperone machine in the cytosol with the HSP70/HSP40 system [52, 53], we set out to investigate and to visualize such complexes for TRAP1 by native PAGE. The TRAP1 complex that we saw had an unexpected apparent molecular weight close to 300 kDa. If TRAP1 were to associate with HSP60 alone, this complex should have been ≥ 70 kDa in size since TRAP1 has been reported to form a dimer [10, 15, 54] and since the minimum functional unit of HSP60 is reported to be an oligomerized heptamer [55]. As a heterotetramer with mtHsp70, it could have been close to the observed apparent size of 300 kDa [16]. However, the MS analysis of proteins pulled down with a TRAP1-GST fusion protein revealed that the detected TRAP1 complex is composed solely of TRAP1. Considering the apparent size of the 400-kDa TRAP1-GST complex, we concluded that it must be composed of four TRAP1 protomers, organized either as a tetramer or as a dimer of dimers. Intriguingly, we could confirm the existence of TRAP1 tetramers with a blue native PAGE analysis (Fig. 5c) and even visualize them by cryo-EM (Fig. 5d). Our preliminary structural model suggests that TRAP1 tetramers might be formed by an orthogonal association of two dimers (Fig. 5e). If validated by more in-depth analyses, this would constitute an entirely novel protomer assembly for a protein of the HSP90 family. Since the three different methods that allowed us to confirm the existence of tetramers yielded different tetramer/dimer ratios, it is conceivable that the TRAP1 tetramer/dimer equilibrium is differentially captured and/or favored by the specifics of the experimental methods. Clear native PAGE, in particular, may favor tetramers, which may explain why we failed to detect homodimers in mitochondrial preparations from mammalian cells, both for endogenous and overexpressed TRAP1. While we formally cannot rule out that our clear native PAGE are unable to resolve dimers and tetramers, considering all of the evidence, this seems unlikely. We therefore speculate that TRAP1 might primarily exist as a tetramer in the mitochondrial matrix at a steady state. It will be interesting to investigate what influences this equilibrium and, most importantly, whether post-translational modifications and different cellular/mitochondrial states affect it.

Intriguingly, higher-order structures for cytosolic HSP90 have been found upon exposure to elevated temperatures [56,57,58]. Moreover, bacterial HtpG was found to be composed of dimers of dimers in the crystal structure [59]. While it remains unclear whether these structures are physiologically relevant for either eukaryotic or bacterial HSP90, our results indicate that they may well be for TRAP1 in mitochondria, which have been demonstrated to function at a higher temperature than the cytosol [60]. It is conceivable that the tetrameric form TRAP1 may be better suited than the homodimer to accommodate some of the large mitochondrial complexes with which it interacts. Since many TRAP1 interactions appear to be ATPase-independent, the TRAP1 tetramer may primarily serve as a holdase at least for some of its clients. Future biochemical and structural analyses of TRAP1 complexes isolated from mitochondria or formed in vitro could help to characterize the determinants and functional importance of this higher-order assembly.

In view of the evidence that a TRAP1 tetramer may be the primary “functional unit” of TRAP1, we reasoned that its levels might be influenced by fluctuating OXPHOS. Indeed, when we inhibited OXPHOS by exposure of cells to hypoxia, we observed that the levels of the TRAP1 complex increased with a corresponding increase in the total mitochondrial protomer levels as observed with native and denaturing PAGE. However, this increase in TRAP1 complex and total protomer levels cannot be attributed to HIF1α as its overexpression does not induce TRAP1 mRNA expression. Hypoxia is a strong inhibitor of ATP synthase [41, 61], and thus, the induction of the TRAP1 complex can be observed both upon inhibiting ATP synthase by hypoxia and in normoxic cells with the pharmacological inhibitor oligomycin. The connection with ATP synthase is further supported by our finding that multiple subunits comprising the ATP synthase complex interact with TRAP1. Although the induction of the TRAP1 complex was consistent with the pharmacological inhibition of ATP synthase across multiple cell lines, the variation in its protomer levels was not. While the TRAP1 complex is induced by inhibition of ATP synthase, it is reduced by inhibition of complex I or III. Surprisingly, we found that inhibition of ATP synthase overrides the latter effect. This pharmacological epistasis experiment argues that ATP synthase is a primary TRAP1 interactor in the ETC. The opposite “perturbation” of OXPHOS, that is its stimulation by an inhibitor of lactate dehydrogenase, similarly promotes the formation of the TRAP1 tetramer. Thus, for reasons that remain to be elucidated, the “functional unit” of TRAP1 is sensitive to both an induction and a decline in OXPHOS.

In toto, although the precise molecular mechanism for how TRAP1 regulates OXPHOS remains to be uncovered, we know now that the overall levels of TRAP1 may not be correlated or relevant to OXPHOS regulation as previously thought [6]. It is really its tetrameric form that needs to be quantitated and structurally and functionally dissected in more detail to understand how TRAP1 contributes to regulating OXPHOS and mitochondrial homeostasis.

Materials and methods

Plasmids

The pcDNA3.1 (+) MTS-HA construct to direct all proteins to the mitochondrial matrix was generated by cloning the human TRAP1 mitochondrial targeting sequence between the EcoR1 site on the pcDNA3.1 (+) vector. All pcDNA3.1 (+) TRAP1-HA constructs including the truncation mutants were generated by cloning the human TRAP1 coding sequence into the pcDNA3.1 (+) MTS-HA construct. The TRAP1 coding sequence (without the MTS) was cloned into the XhoI restriction site after the TRAP1-MTS but before the HA-tag. The E115A/R402A and the ΔStrap mutants were subcloned from pPROEX HTb vectors into the XhoI site of the MTS-HA vector using the primers listed in Additional file 16: Table S9. The mitoEGFP construct was generated by cloning the EGFP coding sequence into the Xho1 site on the pcDNA3.1 (+) MTS-HA vector, exactly like TRAP1. mitoEGFP and all TRAP1 constructs with the pcDNA3.1 (+) MTS-HA vector have a C-terminal HA-tag. The TRAP1-FLAG and D158N-FLAG constructs were generated by cloning the TRAP1 coding sequence along with the C-terminal FLAG-tag between Kpn1 and Xho1 sites on the pcDNA3.1 (+) vector. For generating the TRAP1-GST construct, the TRAP1 coding sequence as a NheI-SalI fragment was joined to a SalI-EcoRI fragment carrying the GST coding sequence by insertion into the NheI-EcoRI sites of expression plasmid pcDNA3.1 (+). The bacterial expression vector for the TRAP1 mutant E115A/R402A was generated from pTRAP1 [14] by site-directed mutagenesis using QuikChange (Agilent Technology). Sequences for all oligos are provided in Additional file 16: Table S9. Note that for all TRAP1 point mutants, the numbering starts with the methionine of the MTS. The pHAGE-fEF1a-IZsGreen constructs used to stably express WT and E115A TRAP1 in MAFs were generated by cloning the respective sequences between the BamHI and NotI sites in plasmid pHAGE-fEF1a-IZsGreen (Additional file 16: Table S9).

Cell culture

HEK293T, HCT116, A549, UMUC3, MCF-7, and PC3 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, see Additional file 16: Table S9). MDA-MB-134 cells were obtained from Wilbert Zwart at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam. Unless specified otherwise, all cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a standard incubator with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) GlutaMAX, 4.5 g/l Glc and 1 mM Pyr (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. For hypoxia experiments, the tissue culture plates with the cells were placed overnight into an Eppendorf Galaxy 48R incubator with the percentage of oxygen set to 1%.

TRAP1 CRISPR/Cas9 knockouts

TRAP1 KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing [62] as illustrated in Additional file 1: Figure S1A. The gRNA was designed using the online design tool by ATUM (https://www.atum.bio/eCommerce/cas9/input). The sense and antisense oligonucleotides for the selected gRNA construct (see Additional file 16: Table S9) were purchased (Microsynth), annealed, and then inserted into the CRISPR/Cas9 vector PX459 (Addgene plasmid #48139) as previously described [62]. HEK293T and HCT116 cells were transiently transfected using polyethylenimine MAX (PEI) at a ratio of 1:3 of DNA to PEI; 48 h post-transfection, the transfected cells were selected using 3–5 μg/ml puromycin until control non-transfected cells completely died. The remaining cells from the transfected population were allowed to grow in the absence of puromycin until they formed visible foci. The cellular foci were then individually picked, subcultured, and finally analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against TRAP1 to identify clones that were devoid of the protein. Three to five different KO clones for each cell line were frozen in liquid nitrogen. The A549 and UMUC3 TRAP1 KO clones were made using the all-in-one vector harboring a mCherry reporter (GeneCopoeia, HCP200164-CG08-3; see Additional file 16: Table S9). The transfection procedure was similar to the one described for HEK293T and HCT116 cells, but the clonal isolation was performed with the mCherry reporter using FACS sorting under aseptic conditions. The sorted clones were subcultured and finally immunoblotted for TRAP1 to identify clones that were devoid of the protein. We did not observe any obvious growth defects or reduced viability for any KO clones or differences between individual clones. Unless indicated otherwise, experiments were done with KO4 for HEK293T cells and KO22 for HCT116 cells.

Cell culture for OCR experiments

Before any single carbon source OCR experiment, the cells were grown overnight in a medium with the carbon source to be tested in order to acclimatize and to stabilize them metabolically. The carbon sources were added to the DMEM lacking Glc, Pyr, and Gln (A14430-01; see Additional file 16: Table S9) with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin as follows: (i) Glc only, 4.5 g/l glucose; (ii) Gln only, 2 mM glutamine; (iii) Pyr only, 1 mM sodium pyruvate; and (iv) Gal and Pyr, 10 mM galactose and 1 mM sodium pyruvate.

Energy metabolism assays

The mitochondrial OCR and ECAR were monitored in vivo in real-time using a Seahorse XF analyzer (XFe24, Agilent). Depending on the experiment, 6 × 104 HEK293T or HCT116 cells were cultured overnight in custom XF24 microplates (poly-l-lysine coated) with either DMEM GlutaMAX or DMEM (A14430-01) supplemented with the respective carbon sources. The standard assay medium used for all extracellular flux analyses and mitochondrial stress tests was unbuffered DMEM (SIGMA, D5030) without glucose, l-glutamine, sodium pyruvate, sodium bicarbonate, phenol red, and FBS. Depending on the experiment, the D5030 medium was supplemented with the desired carbon source as indicated above. Prior to measurements, the cells were washed with and then incubated in unbuffered media (D5030) containing the respective carbon source in the absence of CO2 for 1 h to acclimatize them to the assay medium. Following preincubation, basal OCR or ECAR were determined before recording mitochondrial stress test profiles by sequential injection of oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), and rotenone with antimycin A in combination. For LDHi experiments, the LDHi (developed by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics (NExT) Program) [63, 64] was injected first followed by an injection of oligomycin, rotenone, and antimycin in combination to completely inhibit mitochondrial respiration.

For all assays involving transfected constructs, 2 × 105 cells were first seeded in 6-well plates and allowed to grow overnight in DMEM GlutaMAX. They were transfected on day 2 with 3 μg DNA using PEI for 6 h and further incubated overnight in DMEM GlutaMAX. On day 3, 6 × 104 transfected cells were seeded in polylysine-coated XF24 microplates and incubated in DMEM GlutaMAX overnight. Real-time OCR and ECAR analyses were done as described above. For Gln only OCR analysis involving transfected constructs, the 6 × 104 cells finally seeded for analysis on day 3 were incubated overnight in DMEM (A14430-01) supplemented with Gln.

Glucose uptake and flow cytometry

The Glc uptake assay was performed with WT and KO HEK293T cells. On day 1, 5 × 105 cells were seeded and allowed to grow overnight in DMEM GlutaMAX. On day 2, the cells were washed and incubated in DMEM (A14430-01) without any carbon sources for 1 h to starve the cells of glucose before being incubated in DMEM supplemented with 150 μg/ml 2-NBDG. Cells were allowed to grow in this medium for 6 h. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, thoroughly washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in 500 μl of PBS. Cells were initially analyzed using a BD FACsCaliber and its software CellQuest Pro. The final data analysis was done using the software FlowJo.

Sensitivity to glutaminase inhibitor

2 × 105 cells were seeded in 6-well plates in a medium with glutamine as the only carbon source and allowed to grow overnight. The following day, 2.5 or 5 nM CB-839 (Cayman chemicals) was added to the cells. Treatment with the vehicle (DMSO) served as a control. Following an overnight incubation, the cells were trypsinized, washed, and resuspended in PBS at room temperature. After incubation of the cells with 2.5 μg/ml propidium iodide in PBS for 15–20 min at 37 °C, cell death was analyzed using flow cytometry.

Total metabolite and flux analysis using 13C-Gln

The metabolic flux analysis using 13C-Gln was performed by Human Metabolome Technologies, Inc. (https://humanmetabolome.com/en/targeted.html). Two biological replicates each of HEK293T and A549 cells were used for this experiment and grown in a medium containing unlabeled Glc and Pyr, and 13C-labeled Gln (13C-Gln). Samples were prepared according to the guidelines of the service provider from 5 × 106 cells/ replicate and resuspended in 50 μl ultrapure water before measurements. The samples were analyzed using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS, Agilent Technologies) in two modes to detect both anionic and cationic metabolites [65,66,67]. Detected peaks were then extracted using MasterHands ver. 2.17.1.11 to obtain m/z, migration time (MT), and peak area. Putative metabolites were assigned based on HMT’s target library and their isotopic ions on the basis of m/z and MT. Absolute quantitations were performed for the total amount of each detected metabolite.

ATPase activity assay with the TRAP1 mutant E115A/R402A

Protein expression and purification

WT and TRAP1 mutant E115A/R402A were overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)-RIL cells at 25 °C following induction with 0.4 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside at O.D.600 ~ 0.7. Cells were resuspended in buffer A (40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 400 mM KCl, and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and lysed using a microfluidizer. The cleared lysate was loaded onto a pre-equilibrated Ni-NTA agarose column (Qiagen) and washed with buffer A supplemented with 30 mM imidazole. Bound protein was eluted using a linear gradient from 30 to 500 mM imidazole in buffer A. Peak fractions were pooled, mixed with His6-TEV protease, and dialyzed against buffer B (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol). The liberated His-tag and His-TEV were removed by reapplying the sample to a Ni-NTA agarose column. Ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 0.5 M was added to the flow-through, which was loaded onto a pre-equilibrated TOYOPEARL Butyl 600 M column (Tosoh Bioscience), eluted using a linear gradient of 0.5 to 0 M ammonium sulfate in buffer C (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol), and dialyzed against buffer D (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, and 6 mM β-mercaptoethanol).

ATPase assay

ATPase activities were determined with recombinant protein at 10 μM at 30 °C in 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 2 mM ATP by measuring the amount of inorganic phosphate released after 30 min using the malachite green colorimetric assay [68].

Isolation of mitochondria

Mitochondria were isolated from cells grown in large 15-cm dishes to approximately 95% (not 100%) confluency using a protocol adapted from Da Cruz and coworkers [69]. Briefly, cells were trypsinized, washed, and pelleted in ice-cold PBS (1000 rpm, 5 min) and then re-suspended in 2 ml ice-cold MB buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 210 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA) and manually homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer (50 times per sample). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000g for 10 min to pellet nuclei and cell debris. The supernatant was spun again at 16,000g for 10 min. The resulting brown pellet contained mitochondria and was rigorously washed 6 times with ice-cold MB buffer by resuspending and centrifugation at 16,000g for 10 min.

TRAP1 IPs

For all IP experiments, the mitochondria isolated from cells expressing various TRAP1 constructs were resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 10 mM sodium molybdate, 0.1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor cocktail (A32965, Thermo Fisher Scientific)) and lysed by sonication (35 cycles of 30 s) using a Bioruptor (Diagenode). For all IPs, 1 mg clarified mitochondrial lysate was incubated overnight with 3 μg anti-HA antibody at 4 °C on a spinning rotor. The following day, 50 μl of Dynabeads-Protein G (10009D, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to the antibody-lysate mix and incubated at 4 °C on a spinning rotor for 3 h. Following incubation, the Dynabeads were washed four times with lysis buffer. The proteins were eluted with NuPAGE sample buffer supplemented with 10 mM DTT.

TRAP1 mutant IP-MS analysis and comparison

The TRAP1 mutant IP-MS analysis was performed by Poochon Scientific (https://www.poochonscientific.com/services/protein-identification/) with three biological replicates per sample and two replicates for controls. Briefly, 2 × 106 HEK293T cells were seeded in 15-cm dishes, grown, and transfected with various constructs using the Jetprime transfection reagent at 70% confluency. Twenty-four hours after transfection, mitochondrial lysate preparation and IPs were performed as described above. Thirty microliters of the total IP sample for each IP (two controls and triplicates for the mutants) was run on a 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE followed by in-gel trypsin digestion and LC/MS/MS analysis. The LC/MS/MS analyses of samples were carried out using a Q-Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For each LC/MS/MS run, the tryptic peptide mixture was loaded onto a peptide trap cartridge set to a flow rate of 5 μl/min. The trapped peptides were eluted onto a reversed-phase PicoFrit column (New Objective, Woburn, MA) using a linear gradient of acetonitrile (3–36%) in 0.1% formic acid. Eluted peptides from the PicoFrit column were then ionized and sprayed into the mass spectrometer, using a Nanospray Flex Ion Source ES071 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For protein identification, two raw MS files from two LC/MS/MS runs for each sample were analyzed using the Thermo Proteome Discoverer 1.4.1 platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for peptide identification and protein assembly. Database searches against the public human protein database obtained from the NCBI website were performed based on the SEQUEST and percolator algorithms through the Proteome Discoverer 1.4.1 platform. The minimum peptide length was specified to be five amino acids. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 15 ppm, and the fragment mass tolerance was set to 0.05 Da. The maximum false peptide discovery rate was specified as 0.01. Finally, the estimation of relative protein abundance was based on PSMs [70, 71]. For further comparison of relative abundance of interacting proteins for a particular mutant or for WT TRAP1, all data were normalized to 100 PSMs for the immunoprecipitated TRAP1 protein in a given replicate.

Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture

SILAC was performed by the NIH proteomics core facility as follows. As a culture medium, DMEM deprived of lysine and arginine was used together with dialyzed fetal bovine serum (10 kDa cutoff). For light medium, l-lysine-2HCl was added to a final concentration of 146.2 mg/l and l-arginine-HCl was added to a final concentration of 84 mg/l. For heavy medium, l-lysine-2HCl (13C6, 15N2) was added to a final concentration of 181.2 mg/l and l-arginine-HCl (13C6, 15N4) was added to a final concentration of 87.8 mg/l. Heavy and light SILAC labeling was achieved by culturing UMUC3 cells in the respective media for 5 cell doublings (replenishing media every 2–3 days). Care was taken to maintain the UMUC3 cell cultures in their log phase of growth. Separate stable cultures of WT and TRAP1 KO UMUC3 cells were established in both heavy and light DMEM. After 5 cell doublings, heavy labeling efficiency was determined to be > 95%. At this point, a comparative analysis of steady-state protein expression in both heavy-labeled KO cells and light-labeled WT cells (or vice versa) was performed in triplicate samples (biological replicates) by the Mass Spectrometry Section of the Collaborative Protein Technology Resource (Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Data were processed using R (https://www.r-project.org), and figures were produced using the package ggplot2 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org). The initial list of proteins identified in the SILAC analysis was first filtered for proteins represented in all 3 biological replicates for KO and WT cells. Next, this list of proteins was filtered for only mitochondrial proteins (200 proteins) using the MitoCarta 2.0 database as a reference. The volcano plot was generated based on a minimum KO/WT fold change of 1.5 with a p value of ≤ 0.05.

LFQ MS analysis

This analysis was done by the Protein Analysis Facility of the University of Lausanne. Three biological replicates of 9 × 106 WT and KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells grown in different carbon source cocktails (Glc + Pyr + Gln, Gal + Pyr, and Gln only) were pooled together and lysed in FASP lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 4% SDS, 10 mM TCEP) at 95 °C for 5 min followed by centrifugation at 14,000g for 10 min. One hundred micrograms of each clarified sample was digested by the FASP method [72]. Fifty micrograms of the resulting peptide mixtures was desalted on Waters SEP-PAK C18 micro elution plates and eluted with 100 μl of 40% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. Six microliters of the eluate was used for the MS analysis using a Q-Exactive hybrid quadrupole orbitrap fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data analysis was done using MaxQuant and Perseus.

Native PAGE

Unless indicated, native PAGE was with clear native gels. For these, 30 μg total mitochondrial protein extracts was resolved on 6% or 8% Tris-glycine gels. The pH values for the stacking and separating parts of the gels, and for the running buffer were 8.8 and 6.8, and 8.3, respectively. Sizes of proteins/complexes were estimated relative to marker bands for native gel electrophoresis (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gels were run at 80 V for 5–6 h at 4 °C. The resolved proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes overnight at 30 V at 4 °C. For blue native PAGE [38], we used 3–12% gels and the markers of the Servagel N Native Starter Kit (Serva) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Clear and blue native polyacrylamide gels were transferred to nitrocellulose and PVDF membranes [73], respectively, to reveal TRAP1 complexes by immunoblotting with an anti-TRAP1 antibody (BD Biosciences). Chemiluminescent images were acquired with a LI-COR Odyssey FC Infrared Imaging System, and representative experiments were quantitated with ImageJ. Note that images were not saturated and that whole bands were quantitated.

Drug treatments

2 × 106 HEK293T, HCT116, MCF-7, MDA-MB-134, or PC3 cells were seeded and grown to 90–95% confluency in 15-cm plates. Depending on the experiment, the cells were treated with 10 μM oligomycin (complex V inhibitor), rotenone (complex I inhibitor), or antimycin A (complex III inhibitor) for 2, 4, 6, or 8 h in medium containing Glc, Pyr, and Gln as carbon sources. Following drug treatments, mitochondrial extracts were prepared and native PAGE run as described above. For LDH inhibition, 5 μM of the LDHi was used for 2, 4, and 6 h.

TRAP1-GST pulldown

2 × 106 HEK293T cells were seeded in 15-cm dishes, grown, and transfected with expression vectors for TRAP1-GST and GST using the Jetprime transfection reagent at 70% confluency. Twenty-four hours after transfection, mitochondrial lysates were prepared in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 10 mM sodium molybdate, protease inhibitor cocktail (A32965, Thermo Fisher Scientific)) as described before. One milligram clarified mitochondrial lysates prepared in lysis buffer was incubated overnight with 50 μl glutathione-conjugated magnetic agarose beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4 °C on a spinning rotor. The beads were washed four times with the same buffer, and the proteins were eluted at room temperature in the same buffer supplemented with 80 mM reduced glutathione. The eluted samples were immediately run on a 6% clear native gel and processed for MS as illustrated in Additional file 12: Figure S5a.

MS analysis of oligomeric TRAP1 complex

The TRAP1 complexes from the GST pulldowns were visualized on the native gels by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB G-250) followed by sequential destaining. The portion of the gel containing the stained TRAP1-GST complex was extracted as shown in Additional file 12: Figure S5a (equivalent position on the gel was extracted for controls; see Additional file 12: Figure S5a). This MS analysis was done by Poochon Scientific. The extracted gel slices were first reduced with DTT and then alkylated with iodoacetamide. Next, the samples were trypsin digested. The digested peptide mixture was then concentrated and desalted using C18 Zip-Tip. The desalted peptides were reconstituted in 20 μl of 0.1% formic acid. From this, 18 μl of peptides was analyzed by LC/MS/MS using a Q-Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer and a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System as described above for TRAP1 IP-MS. Six and two replicates for TRAP1-GST and GST, respectively, were processed in parallel, and only proteins common to all respective replicates were further considered. Proteins in the oligomeric TRAP1 complex were determined by filtering the data for proteins with a high number (11) of unique peptides and cross-referencing with the GST control to eliminate overlapping proteins as illustrated in Additional file 12: Figure S5b.

Q-PCR analysis

2 × 105 WT HEK293T cells were seeded in 6-well plates overnight. On day 2, one set was transfected with a HIF1α expression vector [74] (see Additional file 16: Table S9) using the Jetprime transfection reagent. On the same day, one set was exposed to hypoxia (1% O2, overnight) and the third set was left in normoxia. On day 3, each set was collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with specific primers (Additional file 16: Table S9). Briefly, RNA was isolated with the acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method [75]. Five hundred nanograms RNA was used for reverse transcription using random primers and the GoScript master mix according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Quantitative real-time PCR was used to examine the expression levels of TRAP1 and HIF1A with GAPDH as the reference gene.

Cryo-EM sample preparation, data acquisition, and image processing

Recombinant human TRAP1 was expressed in E. coli BL21 cells and purified as described previously [15]; 4 μM purified human TRAP1 was incubated with 1 mM AMPPNP and 1 mM MgCl2 at 37 °C for 30 min before application to the grid (Quantifoil holey carbon grid, 400 mesh) and vitrified using a Vitrobot Mark IV. A total of 665 micrographs were collected on a Titan Krios microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 300 kV with a K2 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan, Inc.) and a slit width of 20 eV on a GIF-BioQuantum energy filter. Images were recorded with SerialEM with a super-resolution pixel size of 0.516 Å. Defocus varied from 0.6 to 2.2 μm. Each image was dose-fractionated to 60 frames (0.2 s each, total exposure of 12 s) with a dose rate of 6 e−/Å2/s for a total dose of 72 e−/Å2. Image stacks were motion-corrected and summed using MotionCor2 [76], resulting in Fourier-cropped summed images with 1.032 Å/pixel. CTFFIND4 was used to estimate defocus parameters for all the images [77]. Initial particle picking was carried out using Gautomatch without a template to generate the 2D class averages, which were then used as templates for a second-round particle picking on micrographs with 25 Å low-pass filtering. Two rounds of reference-free 2D classification were performed for 25 iterations each with images binned by 2 using Relion 3.0 [78].

Statistical analyses

Data analysis was primarily performed using GraphPad Prism 8, Perseus (MS), and Microsoft Excel. The differences between various groups were analyzed with a two-tailed Students t test. Until specified, the error bars represent the standard error of the mean with *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 denoting the difference between the means of two compared groups considered to be statistically significant. Each real-time OCR tracing profile shown represents a cumulative plot of three technical replicates per cell type.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in either the published article or its additional files. The MS proteomics data are also available through the ProteomeXchange Consortium (via the PRIDE partner repository) through the following links: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD015789, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD015828, and http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD015873.

References

  1. 1.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schulze A, Harris AL. How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption. Nature. 2012;491:364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yoshida S, Tsutsumi S, Muhlebach G, Sourbier C, Lee M-J, Lee S, Vartholomaiou E, et al. Molecular chaperone TRAP1 regulates a metabolic switch between mitochondrial respiration and aerobic glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(17):E1604–E12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sciacovelli M, Guzzo G, Morello V, Frezza C, Zheng L, Nannini N, Calabrese F, et al. The mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 promotes neoplastic growth by inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase. Cell Metab. 2013;17(6):988–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Masgras I, Sanchez-Martin C, Colombo G, Rasola A. The chaperone TRAP1 as a modulator of the mitochondrial adaptations in cancer cells. Front Oncol. 2017;7(58):58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rasola A, Neckers L, Picard D. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation TRAP(1)ped in tumor cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(8):455–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Felts SJ, Owen BA, Nguyen P, Trepel J, Donner DB, Toft DO. The hsp90-related protein TRAP1 is a mitochondrial protein with distinct functional properties. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(5):3305–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cechetto JD, Gupta RS. Immunoelectron microscopy provides evidence that tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP-1) is a mitochondrial protein which also localizes at specific extramitochondrial sites. Exp Cell Res. 2000;260(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kang BH. TRAP1 regulation of mitochondrial life or death decision in cancer cells and mitochondria-targeted TRAP1 inhibitors. BMB Rep. 2012;45(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lavery LA, Partridge JR, Ramelot TA, Elnatan D, Kennedy MA, Agard DA. Structural asymmetry in the closed state of mitochondrial Hsp90 (TRAP1) supports a two-step ATP hydrolysis mechanism. Mol Cell. 2014;53(2):330–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Picard D. Preface to Hsp90. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):605–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Röhl A, Rohrberg J, Buchner J. The chaperone Hsp90: changing partners for demanding clients. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38(5):253–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schopf FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(6):345–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sung N, Lee J, Kim JH, Chang C, Joachimiak A, Lee S, Tsai FT. Mitochondrial Hsp90 is a ligand-activated molecular chaperone coupling ATP binding to dimer closure through a coiled-coil intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(11):2952–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elnatan D, Betegon M, Liu Y, Ramelot T, Kennedy MA, Agard DA. Symmetry broken and rebroken during the ATP hydrolysis cycle of the mitochondrial Hsp90 TRAP1. eLife. 2017;6:e25235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sung N, Lee J, Kim JH, Chang C, Tsai FT, Lee S. 2.4 Å resolution crystal structure of human TRAP1NM, the Hsp90 paralog in the mitochondrial matrix. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2016;72(Pt 8):904–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li J, Soroka J, Buchner J. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery: conformational dynamics and regulation by co-chaperones. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):624–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chae YC, Angelin A, Lisanti S, Kossenkov AV, Speicher KD, Wang H, Powers JF, et al. Landscape of the mitochondrial Hsp90 metabolome in tumours. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Park HK, Hong JH, Oh YT, Kim SS, Yin J, Lee AJ, Chae YC, et al. Interplay between TRAP1 and sirtuin-3 modulates mitochondrial respiration and oxidative stress to maintain stemness of glioma stem cells. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1369–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vander Heiden MG, DeBerardinis RJ. Understanding the intersections between metabolism and cancer biology. Cell. 2017;168(4):657–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aguer C, Gambarotta D, Mailloux RJ, Moffat C, Dent R, McPherson R, Harper ME. Galactose enhances oxidative metabolism and reveals mitochondrial dysfunction in human primary muscle cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Owen OE, Kalhan SC, Hanson RW. The key role of anaplerosis and cataplerosis for citric acid cycle function. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(34):30409–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hua G, Zhang Q, Fan Z. Heat shock protein 75 (TRAP1) antagonizes reactive oxygen species generation and protects cells from granzyme M-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(28):20553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Panaretou B, Prodromou C, Roe SM, O’Brien R, Ladbury JE, Piper PW, Pearl LH. ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the function of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo. EMBO J. 1998;17(16):4829–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Grenert JP, Johnson BD, Toft DO. The importance of ATP binding and hydrolysis by hsp90 in formation and function of protein heterocomplexes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17525–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Obermann WM, Sondermann H, Russo AA, Pavletich NP, Hartl FU. In vivo function of Hsp90 is dependent on ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis. J Cell Biol. 1998;143(4):901–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhao R, Davey M, Hsu YC, Kaplanek P, Tong A, Parsons AB, Krogan N, et al. Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell. 2005;120(5):715–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Echeverria PC, Bernthaler A, Dupuis P, Mayer B, Picard D. An interaction network predicted from public data as a discovery tool: application to the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machine. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Taipale M, Tucker G, Peng J, Krykbaeva I, Lin ZY, Larsen B, Choi H, et al. A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the architecture of cellular protein homeostasis pathways. Cell. 2014;158(2):434–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(7):515–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Guzzo G, Sciacovelli M, Bernardi P, Rasola A. Inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase by the mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 has anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic effects on tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5(23):11897–908.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kang BH, Plescia J, Dohi T, Rosa J, Doxsey SJ, Altieri DC. Regulation of tumor cell mitochondrial homeostasis by an organelle-specific Hsp90 chaperone network. Cell. 2007;131(2):257–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pridgeon JW, Olzmann JA, Chin LS, Li L. PINK1 protects against oxidative stress by phosphorylating mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(7):e172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Fitzgerald JC, Zimprich A, Carvajal Berrio DA, Schindler KM, Maurer B, Schulte C, Bus C, et al. Metformin reverses TRAP1 mutation-associated alterations in mitochondrial function in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2017;140(9):2444–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Masola B, Ngubane NP. The activity of phosphate-dependent glutaminase from the rat small intestine is modulated by ADP and is dependent on integrity of mitochondria. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;504(2):197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nelson D, Rumsey WL, Erecinska M. Glutamine catabolism by heart muscle: regulation of phosphate-activated glutaminase by ATP, citrate, and chloride. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994;314(2):376–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Millson SH, Truman AW, Wolfram F, King V, Panaretou B, Prodromou C, Pearl LH, et al. Investigating the protein-protein interactions of the yeast Hsp90 chaperone system by two-hybrid analysis: potential uses and limitations of this approach. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2004;9(4):359–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schägger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem. 1991;199(2):223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wittig I, Schägger H. Advantages and limitations of clear-native PAGE. Proteomics. 2005;5(17):4338–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Masgras I, Ciscato F, Brunati AM, Tibaldi E, Indraccolo S, Curtarello M, Chiara F, et al. Absence of neurofibromin induces an oncogenic metabolic switch via mitochondrial ERK-mediated phosphorylation of the chaperone TRAP1. Cell Rep. 2017;18(3):659–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Solaini G, Baracca A, Lenaz G, Sgarbi G. Hypoxia and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797(6):1171–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lisanti S, Tavecchio M, Chae YC, Liu Q, Brice AK, Thakur ML, Languino LR, et al. Deletion of the mitochondrial chaperone TRAP-1 uncovers global reprogramming of metabolic networks. Cell Rep. 2014;8(3):671–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zierer BK, Rubbelke M, Tippel F, Madl T, Schopf FH, Rutz DA, Richter K, et al. Importance of cycle timing for the function of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(11):1020–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Balasubramanian A, Markovski M, Hoskins JR, Doyle SM, Wickner S. Hsp90 of E. coli modulates assembly of FtsZ, the bacterial tubulin homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(25):12285–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Elnatan D, Agard DA. Calcium binding to a remote site can replace magnesium as cofactor for mitochondrial Hsp90 (TRAP1) ATPase activity. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(35):13717–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wu Z, Gholami AM, Kuster B. Systematic identification of the HSP90 candidate regulated proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(6):M111 016675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Echeverria PC, Bhattacharya K, Joshi A, Wang T, Picard D. The sensitivity to Hsp90 inhibitors of both normal and oncogenically transformed cells is determined by the equilibrium between cellular quiescence and activity. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0208287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Weidenauer L, Wang T, Joshi S, Chiosis G, Quadroni MR. Proteomic interrogation of HSP90 and insights for medical research. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017;14(12):1105–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rodina A, Wang T, Yan P, Gomes ED, Dunphy MPS, Pillarsetty N, Koren J, et al. The epichaperome is an integrated chaperome network that facilitates tumour survival. Nature. 2016;538:397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Fierro-Monti I, Echeverria P, Racle J, Hernandez C, Picard D, Quadroni M. Dynamic impacts of the inhibition of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 on the T-cell proteome have implications for anti-cancer therapy. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Echeverría PC, Picard D. A global view of the proteome perturbations by Hsp90 inhibitors. In: Houry WA, editor. The molecular chaperones interaction networks in protein folding and degradation. New York: Science+Business Media; 2014. p. 133–50.

  52. 52.

    Moran Luengo T, Kityk R, Mayer MP, Rüdiger SGD. Hsp90 breaks the deadlock of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Mol Cell. 2018;70(3):545–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Genest O, Wickner S, Doyle SM. Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones: collaborators in protein remodeling. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(6):2109–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lee C, Park HK, Jeong H, Lim J, Lee AJ, Cheon KY, Kim CS, et al. Development of a mitochondria-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor based on the crystal structures of human TRAP1. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(13):4358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Cheng MY, Hartl FU, Horwich AL. The mitochondrial chaperonin hsp60 is required for its own assembly. Nature. 1990;348(6300):455–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Moullintraffort L, Bruneaux M, Nazabal A, Allegro D, Giudice E, Zal F, Peyrot V, et al. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the Mg2+-induced 90-kDa heat shock protein oligomers. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(20):15100–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lepvrier E, Moullintraffort L, Nigen M, Goude R, Allegro D, Barbier P, Peyrot V, et al. Hsp90 oligomers interacting with the Aha1 cochaperone: an outlook for the Hsp90 chaperone machineries. Anal Chem. 2015;87(14):7043–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lepvrier E, Nigen M, Moullintraffort L, Chat S, Allegro D, Barbier P, Thomas D, et al. Hsp90 oligomerization process: How can p23 drive the chaperone machineries? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1854(10 Pt A):1412–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Shiau AK, Harris SF, Southworth DR, Agard DA. Structural analysis of E. coli hsp90 reveals dramatic nucleotide-dependent conformational rearrangements. Cell. 2006;127(2):329–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Chretien D, Benit P, Ha HH, Keipert S, El-Khoury R, Chang YT, Jastroch M, et al. Mitochondria are physiologically maintained at close to 50 degrees C. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(1):e2003992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bosetti F, Yu G, Zucchi R, Ronca-Testoni S, Solaini G. Myocardial ischemic preconditioning and mitochondrial F1F0-ATPase activity. Mol Cell Biochem. 2000;215(1–2):31–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2281–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Rai G, Brimacombe KR, Mott BT, Urban DJ, Hu X, Yang SM, Lee TD, et al. Discovery and optimization of potent, cell-active pyrazole-based inhibitors of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). J Med Chem. 2017;60(22):9184–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yeung C, Gibson AE, Issaq SH, Oshima N, Baumgart JT, Edessa LD, Rai G, et al. Targeting glycolysis through inhibition of LDH impairs tumor growth in preclinical models of Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5060–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Soga T, Heiger DN. Amino acid analysis by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2000;72(6):1236–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Soga T, Ueno Y, Naraoka H, Ohashi Y, Tomita M, Nishioka T. Simultaneous determination of anionic intermediates for Bacillus subtilis metabolic pathways by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2002;74(10):2233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Soga T, Ohashi Y, Ueno Y, Naraoka H, Tomita M, Nishioka T. Quantitative metabolome analysis using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2003;2(5):488–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Carter SG, Karl DW. Inorganic phosphate assay with malachite green: an improvement and evaluation. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1982;7(1):7–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Da Cruz S, Xenarios I, Langridge J, Vilbois F, Parone PA, Martinou JC. Proteomic analysis of the mouse liver mitochondrial inner membrane. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(42):41566–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2004;76(14):4193–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;389(4):1017–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6:359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Dewson G. Blue native PAGE and antibody gel shift to assess Bak and Bax conformation change and oligomerization. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2015;2015(5):485–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kondo K, Klco J, Nakamura E, Lechpammer M, Kaelin WG Jr. Inhibition of HIF is necessary for tumor suppression by the von Hippel-Lindau protein. Cancer Cell. 2002;1(3):237–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Zheng SQ, Palovcak E, Armache JP, Verba KA, Cheng Y, Agard DA. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):331–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Rohou A, Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol. 2015;192(2):216–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zivanov J, Nakane T, Forsberg BO, Kimanius D, Hagen WJ, Lindahl E, Scheres SH. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife. 2018;7:e42166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jean-Claude Martinou for the invaluable discussions regarding this project, the non-commercial MS service PAF of the University of Lausanne, and Guillaume Mühlebach for the construction of a plasmid.

Funding

This study has been supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01-GM111084) to FTFT; by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (DAA), a Helen Hay Whitney Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (YL), and an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (YL); by funds from the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research (LN), and the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Canton de Genève (DP). The funders were not involved in the research or the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Len Neckers and Didier Picard are senior authors who contributed equally.

Affiliations

  1. Département de Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Genève, Sciences III, 30, quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland
    • Abhinav Joshi
    • , Nastaran Mohammadi Ghahhari
    • , Gregory Segala
    • , Lilia Bernasconi
    •  & Didier Picard
  2. Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
    • Abhinav Joshi
    • , Li Dai
    • , Kristin Beebe
    •  & Len Neckers
  3. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
    • Yanxin Liu
    •  & David A. Agard
  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
    • Jungsoon Lee
    •  & Francis T. F. Tsai
  5. Present address: Department of Pediatrics, Tropical Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
    • Jungsoon Lee
  6. Laboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
    • Lisa M. Jenkins
    •  & Gaelyn C. Lyons
  7. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
    • Francis T. F. Tsai
  8. Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
    • Francis T. F. Tsai
Authors
  1. Abhinav Joshi
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Li Dai
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Yanxin Liu
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Jungsoon Lee
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  5. Nastaran Mohammadi Ghahhari
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  6. Gregory Segala
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  7. Kristin Beebe
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  8. Lisa M. Jenkins
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  9. Gaelyn C. Lyons
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  10. Lilia Bernasconi
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  11. Francis T. F. Tsai
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  12. David A. Agard
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  13. Len Neckers
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  14. Didier Picard
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

AJ conceived the study, designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared the figures, and wrote the manuscript. LD designed and performed the quantitative metabolic flux and SILAC experiments, the latter with the technical support from LMJ and GCL. YL and DAA did the cryo-EM analysis. NG performed and analyzed the Q-PCR data. JL and FTFT purified the TRAP1 E115A/R402A mutant and performed and analyzed its ATPase activity. GS helped in the analysis of SILAC data. KB helped with the analysis of proteomics data. LB performed the control clear and blue native gel experiments. LN was responsible for understanding the metabolic dynamics, designing and supervising the experiments, and writing the manuscript. DP supervised the work, contributed to the design of the experiments, and wrote and critically edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the overall editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Didier Picard.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Generation of TRAP1 KO cells and additional metabolic profiling. (a) Workflow for the generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TRAP1 KO clones. Unlike HEK293T and HCT116 clones, A549 and UMUC3 TRAP1 KO clones were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using a vector allowing mCherry expression (see Additional file 16: Table S9). (b) OCR traces of WT and KO HCT116 cells with Glc + Pyr + Gln as carbon sources. (c-i) OCR and ECAR traces of WT and KO HEK293T or HCT116 cells with different primary carbon sources.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Carbon flux and total quantitation of target metabolites. (a) Schematic metabolic map showing the flow and distribution of 13C atoms in metabolites of the TCA cycle when cells consume 13C-Gln. Note that most of these metabolites traced with 13C-Gln were found to be upregulated in TRAP1 KO cells. (b, c) Total quantitation of target metabolites in WT and KO HEK293T and A549 cells. Note that this is “total” quantitation and should not be confused with 13C tracing. Total quantitation must be combined with the information provided in Additional file 4: Table S2 to infer metabolites with increased 13C incorporation. Data points on bar graphs indicate metabolite concentration per 106 cells from each biological replicate (n = 2).

Additional file 3: Table S1. Quantitative estimation of target metabolites in HEK293T and A549 cells.

Additional file 4: Table S2. Quantitative 13C tracing in target metabolites in HEK293T and A549 cells.

Additional file 5: Figure S3. TRAP1 truncation and point mutants. (a) Schematic representation of the constructs for expression of mitochondrially targeted TRAP1 and EGFP. (b) Fluorescence micrographs showing proper targeting of mitoEGFP to mitochondria. Mitochondria are revealed with MitotrackerRED. (c) Expression analysis of TRAP1 truncation mutants by immunoblotting with an antibody to their HA-tag. (d) ATPase activity assay for the TRAP1 double mutant E115A/R402A. (e) Quantitation of basal respiration rates in WT versus KO HEK293T cells expressing the indicated proteins. Note that all ATPase mutants can rescue the KO phenotype to WT levels.

Additional file 6: Figure S4. Analysis of the whole cell proteome and TRAP1-associated proteins. (a) Control immunoblot performed to check TRAP1 WT and mutant expression in the KO cells used for the IP-MS experiments. (b, c) Comparative relative abundance of proteins immunoprecipitated with the indicated TRAP1 ATPase muatnts or WT TRAP1. The scatterplot was generated as mentioned in the legend to Fig. 4a. (d, e) Scatter plots comparing the levels (LFQ intensities) of the 3679 high confidence proteins between WT and KO HEK293T or HCT116 cells. Note that proteins highlighted in red above or below the 2-fold cutoff did not change consistently between the two cell lines.

Additional file 7: Table S3. List of all identified proteins pulled down with TRAP1 using an IP-MS analysis with WT TRAP1, and the TRAP1 mutants E115A/R402A and ΔStrap.

Additional file 8: Table S4. List of high confidence TRAP1 interacting proteins (from Additional file 10: Table S3) filtered for mitochondrial localization and a minimum of 4 or more identified unique peptides (with a few exceptions).

Additional file 9: Table S5. List of mitochondrial proteins identified in the SILAC analysis comparing WT to TRAP1 KO UMUC3 cells. Note that only those proteins were considered that were identified and quantitated in all three replicates.

Additional file 10: Table S6. Complete list of proteins identified in whole cell LFQ MS analysis to compare WT to TRAP1 KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells.

Additional file 11: Table S7. List of high confidence proteins identified in whole cell LFQ analysis to compare WT to TRAP1 KO HEK293T and HCT116 cells. The 4578 proteins from Additional file 10: Table S6 were reduced to 3679 by selecting only those with at least 4 identified unique peptides in the LFQ analysis.

Additional file 12: Figure S5. An extension of Figure 5 showing TRAP1-GST pulldown MS strategy and analysis, and a control experiment for mitochondrial lysis conditions. (a) TRAP1-GST pulldown strategy. (b) Venn diagram of the proteins identified by the MS analysis. Note that TRAP1 peptides are the only unique ones in the TRAP1-GST pulldown samples compared to the GST controls. (c) TRAP1 complexes from mitochondria, lysed with the indicated buffers, analysed by native PAGE and SDS-PAGE. The standard lysis buffer contained 1 mM DTT and 0.1% Triton X-100 (first lane); variations as indicated. IGEPAL, IGEPAL CA-630 (Sigma-Aldrich #I30211).

Additional file 13: Table S8. TRAP1 complex MS analysis.

Additional file 14: Figure S6. TRAP1 is not induced by HIF1α and the TRAP1 complex is ubiquitous. (a) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the mRNA levels for HIF1α and TRAP1. All data are reported as means ± SEM (n = 3). (b) Analysis of TRAP1 complexes from indicated cell lines by native PAGE and SDS-PAGE.

Additional file 15: Figure S7. Differential effects of drug treatments on the TRAP1 complex.

Additional file 16: Table S9. List of reagents and resources.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Dai, L., Liu, Y. et al. The mitochondrial HSP90 paralog TRAP1 forms an OXPHOS-regulated tetramer and is involved in mitochondrial metabolic homeostasis. BMC Biol 18, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-0740-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • HSP90
  • TRAP1
  • Oxidative phosphorylation
  • Glutamine
  • Mitochondria
  • Molecular chaperone
  • ATP synthase
  • Proteomics

BMC Biology

ISSN: 1741-7007

Contact us