Skip to main content

Invasive snails, parasite spillback, and potential parasite spillover drive parasitic diseases of Hippopotamus amphibius in artificial lakes of Zimbabwe

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Humans impose a significant pressure on large herbivore populations, such as hippopotami, through hunting, poaching, and habitat destruction. Anthropogenic pressures can also occur indirectly, such as artificial lake creation and the subsequent introduction of invasive species that alter the ecosystem. These events can lead to drastic changes in parasite diversity and transmission, but generally receive little scientific attention.

Results

In order to document and identify trematode parasites of the common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) in artificial water systems of Zimbabwe, we applied an integrative taxonomic approach, combining molecular diagnostics and morphometrics on archived and new samples. In doing so, we provide DNA reference sequences of the hippopotamus liver fluke Fasciola nyanzae, enabling us to construct the first complete Fasciola phylogeny. We describe parasite spillback of F. nyanzae by the invasive freshwater snail Pseudosuccinea columella, as a consequence of a cascade of biological invasions in Lake Kariba, one of the biggest artificial lakes in the world. Additionally, we report an unknown stomach fluke of the hippopotamus transmitted by the non-endemic snail Radix aff. plicatula, an Asian snail species that has not been found in Africa before, and the stomach fluke Carmyerius cruciformis transmitted by the native snail Bulinus truncatus. Finally, Biomphalaria pfeifferi and two Bulinus species were found as new snail hosts for the poorly documented hippopotamus blood fluke Schistosoma edwardiense.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that artificial lakes are breeding grounds for endemic and non-endemic snails that transmit trematode parasites of the common hippopotamus. This has important implications, as existing research links trematode parasite infections combined with other stressors to declining wild herbivore populations. Therefore, we argue that monitoring the anthropogenic impact on parasite transmission should become an integral part of wildlife conservation efforts.

Graphical abstract

Background

Large artificial lakes can be a major driver of the socio-economic development of a region by improving water accessibility, stimulating agricultural irrigation and generating renewable energy [1, 2]. Globally, 3700 medium to large size artificial lakes (those with a capacity larger than 1 MW) have been built or are under construction [2, 3]. Nevertheless, dam construction also has tremendous repercussions on the surrounding environment as it can lead to the dislodgement and extinction of local aquatic communities, altered migration of aquatic biota, changes in aquatic biochemistry and physiology, disturbances of flood dynamics, introduction of exotic and invasive species, and the creation of breeding grounds for (non-)endemic vectors and intermediate hosts of (non-)endemic parasite species [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Additionally, the subsequent intensification of agriculture, animal husbandry and aquaculture near artificial lakes can lead to increased parasite transmission to humans, wildlife and domesticated animals [6, 12,13,14,15].

Snails play a key role as the intermediate host in the life cycle of trematode parasites and are a prime example of intermediate hosts that thrive in artificial lakes, as shown by multiple studies [5, 7, 10, 11, 16]. Consequently, the health burden on the definitive host of these parasites increases, as illustrated by the construction of the Diama dam in Northern Senegal, which caused drastic changes in the aquatic chemistry (e.g., reduced salinity and increased pH) that favored the colonization of planorbid snails and the subsequent establishment of one of the world’s biggest foci of human intestinal schistosomiasis [17]. Another study suggests that dams block migratory river prawns that predate on planorbid snails and thereby increase the risk of schistosomiasis for millions of people worldwide [16]. The use of agrochemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides on irrigated land can further stimulate snail—and thus trematode—prevalence by reducing snail predator populations and increasing algal growth, the main food source of freshwater snails [12, 15]. Besides favoring the colonization and proliferation of endemic snail species, artificial lakes can also facilitate the establishment of non-endemic snails that have the potential to drastically alter the dynamics of trematode transmission [5, 18, 19]. Invasive non-endemic snails can affect parasite transmission in three distinct ways: (1) by introducing non-endemic parasites, defined as “spillover”, (2) by successfully transmitting endemic parasites with an overall increased transmission as a result, defined as “spillback”, or (3) by transmitting endemic parasites but with a lower transmission potential, resulting in a “dilution” effect [20,21,22].

Recently, we found strong indications that in Lake Kariba, the world’s biggest artificial lake by volume, the proliferation of the invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) has facilitated the establishment of the invasive North American snail Pseudosuccinea columella, which in turn supports an extremely high prevalence (65%) of an unknown fasciolid trematode species [5]. The impressive success of P. columella snails in colonizing Lake Kariba, as well as the high trematode infection prevalence, suggests a significant health burden for the affected definitive host(s). The high parasite transmission by this invasive snail can be designated as either a spillback or a spillover phenomenon [22]. To discriminate between both scenarios, the identity of the parasite and final host are key. Carolus and colleagues [5] showed that the trematode transmitted by P. columella is phylogenetically closely related to Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica. However, the high genetic distances between this unknown species and other Fasciola species (based on mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences) suggested it to be (1) a new species, (2) a species not represented in current molecular databases, or (3) a hybrid species, as fasciolids are well-known for their hybridization potential [23,24,25]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to revisit Lake Kariba in order to collect more information on this parasite and its intermediate and definitive hosts. This subsequent sampling campaign involved the collection of snails and adult liver and stomach flukes from a culled hippopotamus, a prime suspect as definitive host [5]. An integrative taxonomic approach [26], combining nuclear and mitochondrial markers, was applied to reveal the identity of the unknown Fasciola sp. and other trematodes. In addition, we investigated whether similar phenomena of biological invasions coupled with parasite transmission are occurring in other artificial water systems in Zimbabwe.

Results

Trematode identification from the dissected hippopotamus

Morphological analysis

Two morphologically distinct liver flukes (hereafter referred to as “Hippo liver fluke(s)”) were collected from the liver bile ducts of the culled hippopotamus. In addition, several hundred bright red stomach flukes (hereafter referred to as “Hippo stomach fluke type 1”) and two small yellowish stomach flukes (hereafter referred to as “Hippo stomach fluke type 2”) were collected from the stomach wall of the hippopotamus. A high-resolution photograph of each adult fluke morphotype is shown in Fig. 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging was only possible for Hippo stomach fluke type 1 due to the low sample size of the other morphotypes (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Specimens of Hippo stomach fluke type 1 had a cylindrical shape that tapered towards the anterior end and showed a marked color change from bright red in fresh specimens to brown upon fixation. The Hippo stomach fluke type 2 had a discoid body shape and one specimen appeared to have two small caudal appendages (Fig. 1c, right specimen). A comparative morphometric analysis (Table 1) of the fixed Hippo liver flukes described above and fixed museum specimens of F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and F. nyanzae (all shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2), combined with the descriptions in literature [27,28,29], indicates that the hitherto unknown Fasciola sp. present in Lake Kariba and Mwenje reservoir is morphologically most similar to F. nyanzae. The body width at 2 mm from the posterior end, the testis location, the testis to body length ratio, and the vitellaria morphology differentiate F. nyanzae from F. hepatica and F. gigantica. This, together with the fact that the definitive host is the common hippopotamus, supports the morphological identification of the Hippo liver fluke(s) as F. nyanzae. Additionally, measurements (Table 1) of the metacercariae (Additional file 1: Figure S3) that were released from two P. columella snails collected in Lake Kariba, fall within the range reported in literature for metacercariae of F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and F. nyanzae [27, 30, 31]. Notably, the observed shedding time between 9 and 11 pm (see the “Trematode infection prevalence in snails” section), coincides with the increased foraging activity of hippos at night [32].

Fig. 1.
figure1

The collected flukes from the male hippopotamus at Lake Kariba. A Hippo liver flukes 1 and 2 (resp. left and right), B Hippo stomach fluke type 1, and C Hippo stomach fluke type 2. Scale bars represent 5 mm. Pictures were cropped and pasted to an artificial black background for contour visibility

Table. 1 Morphometric analysis of Fasciola species. Three reference measurements from literature are provided for Fasciola nyanzae collected from Hippopotamus amphibius [27,28,29]. All measurements are provided in mm, except measurements of metacercariae which are displayed in μm. Metacercarial measurements for Hippo liver fluke 1 and 2 were taken from two shedding Pseudosuccinea columella snails from site 3 in Kariba (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Metacercarial cyst measurements for Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica were taken from Alicata [30] and Vareille-Morel et al. [31], respectively. Variables that differentiate between the three Fasciola species are in bold italics. Measurements were taken with ImageJ software on 70% EtOH fixed samples with exception of the reports from literature. Measurement methodology is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2. Abbreviations: body length to body width ratio (BL/BW), body length (BL), body width at widest point (BW), posterior width at 2 mm from the posterior end (BW2), cephalic cone length until shoulders (CL), ventral sucker anteroposterior diameter (VS), testis location in body length (Testis loc.), testis to body length ratio, vitellaria location in body length, outer diameter metacercaria (OD cyst), inner diameter metacercaria (without fibrous layer, ID cyst)

Molecular analysis

The obtained COI sequences for Hippo stomach fluke type 1 and 2 (871 base pairs [bp] and 675 bp, “GenBank: MT909560 and MT909561” resp.) did not closely match any of the available sequences on the GenBank or BOLD databases. The closest BLAST hits were Gastrothylax crumenifer (89% identity score) and Explanatum explanatum (87% identity score), respectively. Our phylogenetic analyses show that Hippo stomach fluke type 1 has close affinity with the Carmyerius genus (Fig. 2). Additionally, the sequence proved 100% identical (COI, 376 bp) to an amphistome infection isolated from Bulinus truncatus in 2017 in Lake Kariba (“GenBank: MT013349 and MT013355” resp. for the snail and the amphistome infection; preprint, [33]). As no deeper taxonomic resolution could be obtained from the molecular data, we further refer to this species as “Carmyerius sp.” Based on COI sequencing, we can conclude that the Hippo stomach fluke type 2 belongs to the superfamily Paramphistomoidea, but it could not be identified to a lower taxonomic level in our phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). The COI sequence was, however, 100% identical (420 bp) to an amphistome infection in Radix sp. (“GenBank: MT013350”; preprint, [33]), here identified as Radix aff. plicatula (see the “Snail identification” section), from Lake Kariba [[5]; preprint, [33]]. All pairwise distances with COI reference sequences on GenBank exceed 12% and thereby surpass the 10% divergence of congeneric trematodes [34]. Therefore, we further refer to this species as “unidentified amphistome species”. DNA sequencing of Hippo liver fluke 1 and 2 resulted in COI fragments of 815 and 862 bp (“GenBank: MT909542 and MT909543” resp.) and rDNA fragments of 3083 and 2987 bp (“GenBank: MT909821 and MT909820”), respectively. The rDNA region, which was identical between the two flukes, covered almost the entire 18S rDNA (1829 bp, see the “Methods” section and Additional file 1: Figure S4), internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1, 454 bp), 5.8S rDNA (160 bp), internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2, 360 bp), and partial 28S rDNA (281 and 185 bp resp. for Hippo liver fluke 1 and 2) regions. The COI sequences differed 2.2% over 814 nucleotides. The COI and rDNA sequences showed the highest similarity (twice 99.3% for COI [“GenBank: MK330628-MK330630”] and 99.9% for rDNA [“GenBank: MK330623-MK330625”]) to the Fasciola sp. infections in P. columella and Radix sp. (here identified as R. aff. plicatula, see the “Snail identification” section) from Lake Kariba, reported by Carolus et al. [5]. The COI pairwise distances of Hippo liver fluke 1 and 2 with F. gigantica (10.6% and 14.4%, resp.) and F. hepatica (16.4% and 18%, resp.) exceed the 5% threshold for species differentiation based on the COI barcoding marker [34, 35]. The rDNA pairwise distances (rDNA sequences were identical between Hippo liver fluke 1 and 2) to F. gigantica and F. hepatica were less pronounced compared to COI distances (0.4% and 0.2%, resp.) (Additional file 1: Table S1 and S2). Phylogenetic analysis based on COI sequences place the Hippo liver fluke as a sister taxon to F. gigantica within the Fasciola genus (Fig. 3a and Additional file 1: Table S1). The placement in the Fasciola genus is confirmed by the rDNA-based phylogeny (Fig. 3c and Additional file 1: Table S2). No DNA sequences could be obtained from the museum samples, probably due to DNA degradation or PCR inhibition as a result of long-term preservation, first in formaldehyde and later in 70% ethanol. This prevented the inclusion of the museum samples (shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2) in our phylogenetic analysis. None of the tested datasets showed conclusive evidence of substitution saturation (see supplementary file: “Raw_data” for the Steel’s and Xia’s method outputs per dataset).

Fig. 2.
figure2

Maximum likelihood analysis of the available sequences of the Superfamily Paramphistomoidea using the GTR + G (= 0.80) + I (= 0.47) model on 758 bp of the COI marker. Homalogaster paloniae (“GenBank: KT266674”), from the family Gastrodiscidae, was used as an outgroup. Nodal support is indicated as bootstrap percentages (1000 bootstraps) and posterior probabilities, respectively before and after the “/” separator. Specimens from this study are indicated in blue. GenBank accession numbers are provided after the “|” separator

Fig. 3.
figure3

A Maximum likelihood analysis of the available sequences of the subfamily Fasciolinae using the GTR + G (= 0.25) model on 814 bp of the COI marker. Fasciolopsis buski (“GenBank: NC_030528”), from the subfamily Fasciolopsinae, was used as an outgroup. B The Fasciola nyanzae COI haplotype network of 11 sequences based on 412 positions, visualized using the TCS model in PopArt®. One hatch mark represents one mutation. The legend indicates the used color-code and haplotype abundance through circle size. C Maximum likelihood analysis of the available sequences of the subfamily Fasciolinae using the GTR + G (= 0.05) model on 2771 bp of the rDNA region. Fasciolopsis buski (“GenBank: MN970005”), from the subfamily Fasciolopsinae, was used as an outgroup. Nodal support is indicated as bootstrap percentages (1000 bootstraps) and posterior probabilities, respectively before and after the “/” separator. Specimens from this study are indicated in blue. GenBank accession numbers are provided after the “|” separator

Snail identification

Six different snail species were sampled in this study: Pseudosuccinea columella and Radix aff. plicatula at Lake Kariba and Radix natalensis, Biomphalaria pfeifferi, Bulinus globosus, and Bulinus sp. at Mwenje reservoir (Fig. 4). Out of 16 sampled sites in Lake Kariba, only site 3 and site 16 harbored snails (see Table 2 for the number of snails per site and Fig. 4 for information on sampling locations). High-resolution photographs of one fixed specimen per species are depicted in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4.
figure4

A Map indicating the sampling locations in the Zambezi basin including “Kariba Town” at Lake Kariba and “Mwenje” at Mwenje reservoir in Zimbabwe. B Sampling sites at Lake Kariba; figure adapted from Carolus et al. [5]. C Sampling site at Mwenje, a temporary puddle adjacent to the main reservoir located at S 17°14′ 47.9″ E 31°01′ 07.7″; figure adapted from Schols et al. [41]. D Sampling site 13 at Lake Kariba. E Sampling site at Mwenje reservoir

Table. 2 Snail abundance and trematode infections per site. All snail species are listed per site along with the number of specimens collected (Sampled), the number of snails that shed cercariae in the shedding experiment (Shedding), the number of snails for which DNA was extracted for diagnostic multiplex PCRs (Tested), the number of samples that tested positive for a trematode infection (Trematoda inf.), and how many of those trematode infections had a Fasciola nyanzae (F. nyanzae inf.), Schistosoma edwardiense (S. edwardiense inf.), or Schistosoma haematobium infection (S. haematobium inf.). For Kariba sites, the number between brackets refers to exact sample location adopted from Carolus et al. [5]. High-resolution pictures of each snail morphotype are shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5.
figure5

Pictures of snail morphotypes collected in Mwenje and Kariba. A Pseudosuccinea columella, B Radix sp. molecularly identified as Radix aff. plicatula, C Radix natalensis, D Biomphalaria pfeifferi, E Bulinus globosus, and F Bulinus sp. Scale bars represent 5 mm. Pictures were cropped and pasted to an artificial black background for contour visibility

COI sequences of P. columella were 100% identical (463 and 433 bp, “GenBank: MT888842”) to the invasive P. columella haplotype reported across Africa, Australia, and Northern America (i.e., Egypt [“BOLD: GBMIN110283-17”], Australia [“BOLD: GBMLG0711-06”], and USA [“BOLD: GBMPL484-13”]). We confirm the presence of this invasive haplotype in Lake Kariba, as published before [5] (see “GenBank: MK333465”). Carolus and colleagues [5] reported an unidentified Radix sp., presumably originating from Asia, but the authors were not able to identify the species, as closely related reference sequences were missing at that time. The COI sequences from the Radix species sampled in this study (“GenBank: MT888847”) show only one mutation in the 350 bp overlapping COI sequence compared to the Radix sp. sequenced by Carolus et al. [5] (see “GenBank: MK333466”). In our phylogenetic analyses, the Radix sp. shows well supported clustering with a recently generated reference sequence of Radix plicatula from China [37] (Additional file 1: Figure S5 and Table S3). However, many radicine snail species are absent from online genetic databases, and shell morphology differs from the description in Vinarski et al. [38]. Therefore, and in combination with the pairwise distance of 3.6% between the Radix sp. from Kariba and the reference sequence of R. plicatula on a 463 bp COI alignment, we identify our current specimen and the previously reported Radix sp. from Lake Kariba as the non-endemic R. affinis plicatula (Additional file 1: Table S3). The qualifier affinis is utilized in accordance with the open nomenclature guidelines of Sigovini and colleagues [39], as our specimens show clear molecular affinity to R. plicatula, but are not identical to it.

The identity of R. natalensis, B. pfeifferi, and B. globosus collected in Mwenje (446 bp, 446 bp, and 463 bp resp.; “GenBank: MT888844-MT888846”) was confirmed based on phylogenetic clustering and pairwise distances below 5%, compared to COI reference sequences in the BOLD and NCBI databases (Additional file 1: Figure S5, S6 and Table S3, S4 and S5). A second Bulinus species from Mwenje (446 bp, “GenBank: MT888843”) could not be identified to species level based on COI barcoding but appears to be part of the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus species complex as indicated by the firm clustering within this group in our phylogenetic analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S6a and Table S5). Further taxonomic identification was not possible as the species group contains 14 species that are morphologically nearly indistinguishable, many of which still lack reliable reference genetic material [36, 40].

Trematode infection prevalence in snails

Cercarial shedding (i.e., release of trematode larvae) was exclusively observed between 9 pm and 11 pm in six out of 103 examined P. columella snails (5.8%) collected in Kariba. No other snail species was found to release cercariae during shedding experiments. When screening for infections through diagnostic PCRs, more infected snails were detected. Table 2 shows the number of snails tested, the number of trematode infections detected and the number of samples where a Schistosoma sp. or Fasciola sp. infection was detected in the multiplex PCR assay. In summary, 77 out of 93 samples (82.8%) had (pre)patent trematode infections. Of all detected infections, a total of 57 out of the 61 (93.4%) infected lymnaeid snails (P. columella and R. aff. plicatula from Kariba and R. natalensis from Mwenje) were infected with a Fasciola sp., while 12 out of the 16 (75%) infected planorbid snails (B. pfeifferi, B. globosus, and Bulinus sp. from Mwenje) were infected with a Schistosoma species.

Trematode identification from snail infections

Tissue of one P. columella specimen and one R. aff. plicatula specimen from Lake Kariba with a positive Fasciola sp. PCR signal was used for trematode COI barcoding (425 bp and 482 bp resp., “GenBank: MT909545 and MT909549” resp.). Both COI sequences showed a pairwise distance of less than 0.5% compared to each other and less than 0.8% compared to the two adult F. nyanzae specimens from the culled hippopotamus (based on 408 bp). Eleven specimens of Radix natalensis from Mwenje with a positive Fasciola sp. PCR signal were used for COI and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequencing. Five COI sequences (~ 400 bp) were ~ 99% identical to a Diplostomidae sp. collected from the adjacent reservoir by Schols et al. [41] (“GenBank: MT994279”), two did not provide sequencing results of sufficient quality and the remaining four amplicons (424 bp–428 bp, “GenBank: MT909546-MT909548 and MT909550”) showed a pairwise distance below 2% to the two adult F. nyanzae specimens from Kariba (results not shown, 408 bp). The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 amplification and sequencing was successful for 10 out of the 11 Fasciola sp. positive samples (464 bp, “GenBank: MT893586-MT893595”). All 10 sequences were 100% identical to each other, to the two adult F. nyanzae and to the S151 haplotype from Carolus et al. [5] (“GenBank: MK330624”).

Using the two-step diagnostic PCR assay of Schols et al. [42] (see the “Methods” section, “detection of infected snails”), we identified S. haematobium in a B. globosus snail. This was confirmed by sequencing part of the COI marker (335 bp, “GenBank: MT886703”) and rDNA region (985 bp, “GenBank: MT884914”) in this specimen. The remaining Schistosoma sp. infections in B. pfeifferi (4), B. globosus (6) and Bulinus sp. (1) gave a Schistosoma-specific amplicon in the first multiplex PCR but did not yield a species-specific amplicon in the second multiplex PCR, indicating it was not Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma mattheei, Schistosoma bovis, Schistosoma curassoni, or Schistosoma guineensis [42]. We, therefore, sequenced the COI marker and the Schistosoma-specific 5.8S-ITS2 amplicon generated in the first multiplex PCR. The COI marker (335 bp, “GenBank: MT886702”) was successfully amplified for only one B. pfeifferi infection and showed a pairwise distance of 0.2% to the preliminary identified S. edwardiense isolated from Biomphalaria sudanica in Uganda (“GenBank: AY197347”). The 5.8S-ITS2 (~ 340 bp, “GenBank: MT884915-MT884924”) marker was successfully sequenced for ten out of the eleven remaining samples and all sequences were 100% identical to each other and to the S. edwardiense reference sequence (“GenBank: AY197344”). Based on these results, we identify all ten remaining Schistosoma sp. infections in B. pfeifferi (3), B. globosus (6), and Bulinus sp. (1) as S. edwardiense.

Haplotype network of Fasciola nyanzae

The genetic diversity of F. nyanzae in Lake Kariba and Mwenje reservoir was assessed using all available COI sequences of F. nyanzae. To build the haplotype network, we included both adult liver flukes collected from the hippopotamus, F. nyanzae sequences isolated from four infected P. columella from Lake Kariba (of which one from this study and three from Carolus et al. [5]: “GenBank: MK330623-MK330625”), one sequence from an infected R. aff. plicatula from Lake Kariba and F. nyanzae sequences from four infected R. natalensis from Mwenje reservoir. The resulting alignment (412 bp) consisted of 11 sequences, of which nine were unique, and the associated haplotype diversity (Hd) was 0.96. The highest pairwise distance between two haplotypes was 1.7%. The haplotype network shows no spatial genetic structure (Fig. 3b).

All GenBank identifiers generated by this study, and those of Carolus et al. [5] and Muzarabani et al. (preprint, [33]) involved in the analyses, are listed together with the sample type, marker, taxonomic identification and region of origin in Additional file 1: Table S6.

Discussion

In this study, we report four trematode species that infect the common hippopotamus and show that they are transmitted by six snail species that thrive in Lake Kariba and Mwenje reservoir. We are able to complete the life cycle for three of these species by identifying them in both the final and the intermediate host. Below, we discuss the biological phenomena behind parasite transmission in artificial lakes and the possible implications for threatened hippopotamus populations.

1. Completing the Fasciola phylogeny

The adult liver flukes sampled in this study match the morphological descriptions of Fasciola nyanzae made by Leiper in 1910 [27]. Since then, only two scientific reports have elaborated on the morphology and life cycle of F. nyanzae [27, 28]. Along with morphological measurements of the cercariae that were genetically identical to the adult liver flukes, these morphological descriptions enable us to identify F. nyanzae and provide the first genetic record of this species. As a result, we can provide the last missing link in the molecular phylogeny of the Fasciola genus and show that F. nyanzae is most closely related to Fasciola gigantica based on partial COI mtDNA (Fig. 3a and Additional file 1: Table S1). This close relationship is also supported by the observation that both species can infect the intermediate snail host R. natalensis and the definitive mammalian host H. amphibius, while no records exist of Fasciola hepatica in hippopotami [27, 43]. This phylogenetic relationship is, however, less clear based on the more conserved nuclear markers, where the distances between F. nyanzae and both F. hepatica and F. gigantica are of the same order and below 1% (Fig. 3c and Additional file 1: Table S2). This apparent mito-nuclear discordance can either be explained by drastically different evolutionary rates between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA [44] or by introgressive hybridization [24, 45]. A higher genomic coverage is needed to conclude on this, as concerted evolution in the rDNA region can blur biological phenomena, such as a bias towards one of the two parental species after hybridization [46]. Our phylogenetic analyses also enable us to contribute to the taxonomic discussion on whether or not Fasciola jacksoni should be reclassified as Fascioloides jacksoni, as suggested by Lotfy et al. [47]. Mas-Coma et al. [43] opposed this reclassification, because the reference sequences used by Lotfy et al. [47] originated from regions where F. gigantica x F. hepatica hybrids are known to occur, F. nyanzae and Tenuifasciola tragelaphi were missing from the phylogenetic analysis, and the mitochondrial marker (nad1) used in the study of Lotfy et al. [47] is too variable, leading to substitution saturation. The inclusion of well-selected reference sequences from regions where no hybridization has been reported, the addition of F. nyanzae, and the use of a less variable mtDNA marker [48] in this study, results in a dataset without substitution saturation and resolves most of the aforementioned issues. Our maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenies of mitochondrial and nuclear markers strongly support the position of F. jacksoni within the genus Fascioloides (Fig. 3a and c and Additional file 1: Table S1 and S2, respectively).

2. Parasite spillback of the hippo liver fluke Fasciola nyanzae in Lake Kariba

Fasciola nyanzae infections were detected in three lymnaeid snail species: the endemic Radix natalensis, the Asian Radix aff. plicatula, and the North American Pseudosuccinea columella. The latter two species are invasive non-endemic snails that could affect parasite transmission in three distinct ways: parasite spillover, parasite spillback or a dilution effect (see the “Background” section for explanations). Co-invading parasites, like other invading fauna and flora, typically go through a genetic bottleneck, resulting in low genetic diversity in the invasive population [49]. In contrast, our F. nyanzae samples show a high genetic diversity with 9 out of the 11 sequenced COI haplotypes being unique. Moreover, their definitive host (H. amphibius) and at least one of their intermediate hosts (R. natalensis) are endemic to Zimbabwe [50, 51], supporting the endemicity of F. nyanzae to this region. In addition, another requirement to comply with a “parasite spillback” hypothesis was met, as a higher F. nyanzae infection prevalence was detected in the invasive snail P. columella compared to native snails. We can therefore confirm that the cascade of biological invasions, in which the invasion of P. columella was facilitated by the introduction and subsequent colonization of water hyacinth from South America as described in Carolus et al. [5], has led to “parasite spillback” of the endemic parasite F. nyanzae in Lake Kariba. Water hyacinth [52] and lymnaeid snails such as P. columella [53] generally thrive in nutrient rich, still, or slow-moving water, but not in fast moving riverine systems, like the Zambezi river, which occupied the Kariba gorge before the construction of Kariba dam. Therefore, we hypothesize that the parasite spillback phenomenon we witness here, is a result of this man-made impoundment.

3. Two hippopotamus stomach flukes, one case of parasite spillover?

Although amphistomiasis, or stomach fluke disease, is one of the most prevalent and pathogenic animal trematodiases, there is a significant knowledge gap concerning the life cycle, host compatibility, prevalence, and geographic range of many amphistome species, especially in Africa [54,55,56]. Amphistomes are most commonly studied in livestock, especially ruminants, but many species infect wild animals. Here, we provide sequences, the intermediate host identity, and high–resolution photographs of two amphistome species of the common hippopotamus (i.e., Carmyerius cruciformis and an unidentified amphistome species). We link these stomach fluke species to infections in the endemic snail B. truncatus reported by Muzarabani et al. (preprint, [33]) and the non-endemic snail R. aff. plicatula, respectively. Based on its morphology (Fig. 1b and Additional file 1: Figure S1), its final and intermediate hosts and close phylogenetic affinity to Carmyerius exoporus (Fig. 2), we tentatively identify the amphistome Hippo stomach fluke type 1, genotyped as “Carmyerius sp.” in this study, as Carmyerius cruciformis. First of all, the reported size, shape, and the distinct color change upon fixation in our specimens match prior descriptions [29, 57]. Secondly, it is the only Carmyerius species described from the hippopotamus so far [58]. Thirdly, members of the Bulinus genus are known intermediate hosts of this parasite [59], which corresponds with the prior infections detected in B. truncatus (“GenBank: MT013350, MT013355”; preprint, [33]), that match our genotype. Fourthly, the oral opening and tegumental papillae (Additional file 1: Figure S1) correspond to prior reports of C. cruciformis [57, 60]. And finally, no reference sequence exists of C. cruciformis, probably explaining the failed attempt to identify this species through molecular barcoding. To our knowledge, this is the first molecular record and southernmost report (other reports are from Kenya, Uganda, Benin, and Chad [58]) of C. cruciformis.

The amphistome Hippo stomach fluke type 2 (Fig. 1c) could not be identified based on the COI phylogeny that includes all families of the superfamily Paramphistomoidea present in online molecular databases (Fig. 2). The absence of a morphologically similar hippopotamus trematode described in literature and the lack of reference sequences for many amphistome families (e.g., family Brumptinae) make the identification of these specimens currently impossible. To further elucidate its phylogenetic position and identify it to species level, future research should study the morphological characteristics such as the tegumental surface and the genital pore through scanning electron microscopy [60] and transversal sections [57], respectively. Furthermore, an integrative taxonomic approach could be applied to generate reference sequences for the missing amphistome families [26, 41]. For the Hippo stomach fluke type 2, sampled from the Asian snail R. aff. plicatula, no prior genetic and morphological records exist, which raises the question whether this parasite is endemic to Africa. The answer will determine whether this is a case of a potential “parasite spillback” (like for F. nyanzae), or a “parasite spillover,” as a result of co-introduction of a non-endemic parasite with a non-endemic snail host.

4. New intermediate hosts for the hippopotamus blood fluke Schistosoma edwardiense?

Three endemic planorbid snail species, namely B. pfeifferi, B. globosus, and an unidentified Bulinus sp. from the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus complex, were found to be infected with the hippopotamus blood fluke S. edwardiense. Although schistosome blood flukes are among the most studied trematode species due to their public health importance, wildlife schistosomes are severely understudied. S. edwardiense has so far only been reported in Uganda [61] and South Africa [62]. The species is known to be transmitted through Biomphalaria snails [61], and so far, Bulinus snails have not been reported as an intermediate host. We cannot conclude whether the molecular detection of S. edwardiense in the two Bulinus species reflects true, compatible host-parasite combinations or whether they are a result of aborted infections, since we did not observe cercarial shedding in these samples (neither in the infected Biomphalaria snails). However, we found a positive PCR signal in seven bulinid specimens, and the closest known relative of S. edwardiense, Schistosoma hippopotami, is also transmitted through bulinid snails [61]. These facts strengthen our hypothesis that apart from B. pfeifferi, bulinid snails are compatible hosts for S. edwardiense too. Our results strengthen the statement of Morgan et al. [61] that S. edwardiense and S. hippopotami belong to a different group, ancestral to the S. mansoni and S. haematobium species groups. The ability to use members of both the Biomphalaria and Bulinus genera appears as a “primitive” trait, which is lost in the derived species groups that specialized in only one of the two snail genera, respectively.

5. The potential health burden of hippopotamus trematodiases

Trematode parasites can have detrimental effects on the health, lifespan, and reproduction of wild and domestic animals. For instance, liver flukes cause hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, internal hemorrhage, and calcification of the bile duct [63]. As a result, fascioliasis in livestock is associated with an increased mortality and abortion rate, reduced growth and a lower productivity [64, 65], which accounts for global economic losses exceeding 3.2 billion US dollars [64]. Fasciola jacksoni and Protofasciola rubusta can form a major health burden and source of (calf) mortality in Asian [66] and African [67] elephants, respectively. Additionally, F. jacksoni has been suggested to be a major contributor to the drastic decline of endangered elephant populations in Asia [66]. Another fluke, Fascioloides magna, is thought to be the single major cause of mortality in a declining population of moose in the USA [68]. Schistosomes or blood flukes are also thought to be an important yet overlooked cause of animal mortality and productivity losses in the livestock industry, with a major underestimated economic impact [69]. Certain schistosome species have also been suggested to be of concern to conservation of endangered animals such as rhinos and elephants in Asia [70] and chimpanzees in Africa [71]. In addition to liver and blood flukes, immature stomach flukes, or amphistomes, inflict damage to the intestine, leading to anorexia and diarrhea, while severe infections can be lethal [72, 73]. Amphistome infections are regarded as one of the most prevalent parasitic disease in livestock [55]. Due to their high morbidity and mortality in young animals, some authors hypothesize that the economic losses due to amphistomiases are greater than many other parasitic diseases in livestock [74].

Few records exist on the pathology and impact of trematode infections in hippopotami, but a similar impact as described above can be expected. The most elaborate study on hippopotamus trematodiases dates back to 1967 and reports one hundred culled hippopotami of the Kruger National Park in South Africa [75]. It describes unknown fasciolids that colonized the bile duct in large numbers, causing lesions and fibrosis of the duct wall and damage extending into the liver parenchyma. The same study reports a high load of schistosomes in the heart and most major blood vessels, especially in the venae cavae, pulmonary and hepatic veins, associated with inflammation, macroscopic lesions, and endocarditis [75]. Since then, no further pathological reports on trematode infections in the common hippopotamus have been published to the best of our knowledge.

Here, we provide a parasitological survey of a single culled hippopotamus from Lake Kariba, in which only parts of the liver and stomach lining were studied. This revealed three different trematode species (i.e., F. nyanzae, C. cruciformis and an unidentified amphistome) with a very high infection intensity of the stomach fluke C. cruciformis. In addition, the high trematode infection prevalence in snail intermediate hosts, reported here and in Carolus et al. [5], indicates that the exposure risk of hippopotami to these parasites is high.

6. Do artificial lakes and biological invasions pose a burden on Hippopotamus amphibius?

Considering our findings and the aforementioned burden of trematodes on wildlife populations, we argue that artificial lakes can act as a breeding ground for (non-)endemic intermediate snail hosts that transmit hippopotamus infecting parasites, and thereby indirectly affect hippopotamus (and possibly other wildlife) populations. Nevertheless, the actual impact of dam construction on hippopotami cannot be directly verified. No data is available on hippopotamus populations and their trematode fauna prior to dam construction or the arrival of invasive snail species. However, key historical reports do show a link between the Kariba dam construction and altered snail and trematode dynamics in the area. A health risk assessment prior to the Kariba dam construction concluded that the chance for a schistosomiasis outbreak was minimal given the rocky substrate of Kariba gorge, which is unsuitable for freshwater snails [76]. At that time, only urinary schistosomiasis was present in the surrounding communities at low prevalence, while B. pfeifferi and thus intestinal schistosomiasis was absent. However, soon after dam construction, urinary schistosomiasis increased and for the first time, intestinal schistosomiasis was reported [77]. Furthermore, Bulinus, Biomphalaria, and lymnaeid species, all potentially suitable intermediate snail hosts for the hippopotamus parasites we describe here, colonized the lake [77]. Later studies confirmed the presence of planorbid snails and increased levels of schistosomiasis in nearby towns [78,79,80,81]. Ultimately, the invasive snails P. columella and Radix sp. (here identified as R. aff. plicatula), which we find to be compatible intermediate hosts for hippopotamus parasites, were first reported in the lake in 2017 [5]. In conclusion, these historical records and our findings strongly suggest that the creation of Lake Kariba has drastically altered parasite transmission dynamics by favoring the colonization and proliferation of (non-)endemic snail species that transmit trematode parasites, including those infecting hippopotami.

Large herbivores such as hippos play pivotal roles in their ecosystems and are therefore crucial targets for conservation efforts, which rely on a profound understanding of the factors that put the target population at risk [82,83,84,85]. Among the major anthropogenic disturbances, such as habitat loss, hunting, and poaching [82, 86], the impact of parasitic diseases remains hard to assess due to knowledge gaps in the diversity and epidemiology of most wildlife parasites [87]. Therefore, the impact of trematode parasites on wildlife populations might be severely underestimated [88]. The common hippopotamus is listed as vulnerable to extinction [50], yet remains populous in southern and eastern Africa with an estimated 5000 specimens in Zimbabwe [50, 85]. However, models show that these populations are two to five times more likely to cross the risk threshold of drastic decline in the next 60 years, if mild human-induced perturbations continue, alongside the present natural disturbance [85]. The combination of disease with other environmental or anthropogenic stressors can impose significant conservation threats [88,89,90]. This is illustrated by Obanda et al. [91], which suggest that infections with the liver fluke P. robusta have a synergetic effect with drought-related starvation in mass-mortality of African elephants in Kenya. Parasitic diseases can thus have major consequences for threatened populations, making it a critical, although understudied issue for the conservation of species [92].

Conclusions

The data presented here suggests that the construction of artificial lakes along with the introduction and establishment of endemic and non-endemic species might have increased or at least altered the burden of snail-borne diseases on hippopotami. Still, to quantify what the exact impact might be, we lack historic and current information on the prevalence and infection intensities of trematode species in the hippopotamus populations in this region. Such information is hard to obtain and requires collaborations between researchers in the fields of ecology, veterinary science, and conservation biology as suggested by previous studies [92, 93]. Nevertheless, enriching the genetic database of wildlife trematodes to design non-invasive sampling methods can generate valuable resources in conservation studies [92]. For example, by providing the genetic reference of parasites like F. nyanzae and C. cruciformis, its prevalence can be monitored by designing species-specific diagnostic PCRs to screen stool samples from hippos and other wildlife species.

Methods

Adult fluke collection and morphometric characterization

A subadult male Hippopotamus amphibius was culled by rangers as part of the wildlife governance quota set for population control, problem animal management, community benefits, or other aspects of sustainable utilization by Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority. The hippopotamus was culled near Kariba Town (Fig. 4), and the liver, bile ducts, and stomach were dissected and inspected for adult trematode parasites. The entire liver and a 15 by 15 cm part of the stomach were screened for liver and stomach flukes, respectively. Fresh adult flukes were stored in 70% ethanol for later DNA analysis and morphometrics. The fixed flukes collected in this study, along with museum (Royal Museum for Central Africa, RMCA) specimens of Fasciola nyanzae, F. gigantica, and F. hepatica (“RMCA tissue vouchers: 31048, 29430, and 22595, resp.”), that were collected in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1956, 1952, and 1938, respectively, were photographed using a Canon EOS 600D camera equipped with a Macro Photo Lens according to Brecko et al. [94]. Pictures were taken at different focal depths while the specimens remained submerged in 70% ethanol and stacked using the Zerene Stacker™ software. Stacked pictures of the adult flukes were used for measurements in the ImageJ software (version 1.8.0). Morphometric measurements were taken of body width at the widest point (BW), body length (BL), cephalic cone length until shoulders (CL), width at 2 mm from the posterior end (BW2), and the anteroposterior diameter of the ventral sucker (VS) (see Additional file 1: Figure S2 for a detailed visualization of how the measurements were done). Specimens for scanning electron microscopy were transferred in acetone for 24 h, then airdried, mounted on aluminum stubs, coated with gold, and studied using a JEOL JSM-6480LV scanning electron microscope.

Snail sampling and shedding experiments

The study area constituted of Mwenje reservoir, and the northeastern shoreline of Lake Kariba, which are two artificial reservoirs of the Zambezi river basin in Zimbabwe. Mwenje dam was erected in 1970, covers roughly 5 km2 when full and has a catchment area of approximately 557 km2 [95]. The Kariba dam was completed in 1959 and Lake Kariba covers about 5,580 km2 when full and has an approximated catchment area of 815,000 km2 [96]. Sampling sites are displayed in Fig. 4. Locations sampled at Lake Kariba were adopted from prior studies [5, 79]. The Mwenje sampling site was located at S 17°14′ 47.9″ E 31°01′ 07.7″ in close vicinity to the reservoir. Snails were collected in October 2018 from water, aquatic vegetation, and sediment by two persons for 30 min per site, using both a scooping net and manual collection. Collected snails were stored in jars with lake water from the site of origin and kept at a constant temperature during transport. Upon arrival, snails were sorted per morphotype, counted, and preliminary identified based on the morphological identification keys of Brown [97] and Mandahl-Barth [98]. Next, shedding experiments were conducted: snails were separated in 12-well cell culture plates and incubated in filtered and aged lake water in complete darkness overnight, followed by bright light exposure for 5 h from 7 am to 12 pm. This treatment induces the natural emergence (i.e., shedding) of larval stages, the so-called cercariae, of several trematode species [55, 99]. Well contents and surfaces were inspected with a stereomicroscope for the presence of cercariae and/or metacercariae, respectively, as cercariae from liver flukes are known to rapidly encyst and form metacercariae on biotic or abiotic surfaces [100]. This was done at the start of the shedding experiment, 10 pm, 7 am, and hourly between 7 am and 12 pm during the bright light exposure experiment to detect nocturnal and diurnal shedding, respectively. All snails were sacrificed by heat shock in ~ 70 °C water to prevent contraction and simplify later DNA extraction, followed by fixation in 80% ethanol, and then we added the released cercariae to the same tube in the event of shedding. Snails that released cercariae were individually stored together with the emerged cercariae, while non-shedding snails were pooled per species per site. One representative of each snail morphotype per site was, prior to DNA extraction, fixed on black clay and photographed from its ventral and dorsal side according to Brecko et al. [94] using the focus stacking system described above. The obtained pictures were processed in Microsoft PowerPoint® by removing the image background and combining the front and rear perspective of the shell in one picture while ensuring a constant scale size. The (meta)cercariae were placed in 80% ethanol on a glass slide with a glass cover. For taking and compiling photos, we used a digital camera QImaging MicroPublisher 5.0 RTV mounted on a Leitz Dialux 22 stereomicroscope and piloted with the Syncroscopy’s Image Reconstruction Software Auto-Montage Pro (version 5.03.0061). The resulting images of (meta)cercariae were used for measurements in the ImageJ software (version 1.8.0).

DNA extraction

DNA of ethanol preserved adult trematodes was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen™) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For each DNA extraction, we used a small piece of tissue isolated from the posterior side of the specimen with a sterile scissor. The DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen™) was not successful for the museum samples of adult trematodes. The specimens are currently stored in 70% ethanol yet were initially fixed in formaldehyde at the time of collection. Formaldehyde, a storage medium often used in the past by museums, is known to inhibit proteinase K-based DNA extractions [101]. Therefore, Chelex® (Biorad™) and phenol chloroform isoamyl alcohol (PCI) based DNA extraction methods were assessed for the same museum samples, which do not rely on proteinase K for lysis. For the Chelex-based extraction, tissue was first incubated for 24 h in ATL buffer (Qiagen™) to flush excess formaldehyde as suggested by Shedlock et al. [101]. Next, samples were homogenized with a sterile scalpel on a glass plate. Tissue homogenate was incubated for 1 h at 56 °C and 30 min at 95 °C in 200 μL of 5% Chelex® (Biorad™) solution in a shaking Thermocycler™. Next, samples were centrifuged for 7 min at 13,000×g, and supernatant DNA extract was collected and stored at − 20 °C. Regarding the PCI-based DNA extraction, tissue samples were dried with sterile absorbent paper, 300 μL Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer and 300 μL PCI solution (phenol pH 6.7-chloroform-isoamylalcohol [25:24:1]) was added, and tissue was lysed by micro-bead shearing in a FastPrep-24TM Classic lysis system (20 s, 6 m/s) (MP biomedical™). The DNA containing fraction was separated from lipids and cellular debris by 10 min of centrifugation at 14,000 rpm. Next, 15 μL sodium acetate (3 M, pH 5.2) and 450 μL ethanol (100%) were added and the mixture was placed in a freezer at − 20 °C for 20 min followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 4 °C (14,000 rpm) for DNA precipitation. Pellets were washed by adding ice cold ethanol (70%) followed by centrifugation (10 min at 4 °C, 14,000 rpm). The resulting DNA was dissolved in TE buffer and stored at − 20 °C. Successful DNA isolation was verified by gel electrophoresis (0.8% agarose gel, SYBR™ Safe).

The DNA of (meta)cercariae was extracted using a proteinase K-based lysis buffer as described in Ziętara et al. [102]. In short, 10 μL of the prepared proteinase K lysis buffer was added to a single cercaria in 10 μL of MilliQ water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A first and second incubation step followed at 65 °C for 25 min and 95 °C at 10 min, respectively. After the protocol, DNA extracts were stored undiluted at − 20 °C.

For DNA extractions from ethanol preserved snail samples, soft tissue was isolated from the shell by using a sterile needle to make a hole in the apex to push the soft tissue out of the shell. Next, the isolated tissue was dried using absorbent paper and homogenized using a sterile scalpel. DNA was extracted using the E.Z.N.A.® Mollusc DNA Kit (OMEGA Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and eluted through two elution steps of 75 μL, totaling to 150 μL of DNA extract. Additionally, the more cost- and time efficient Chelex® (Biorad™) method [5, 103] was used on 24 non-shedding P. columella specimens per site in Lake Kariba, as described previously. All DNA extracts were diluted 1:10 with MilliQ water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to prevent inhibition of PCR reactions.

Molecular diagnosis of infected snails

The DNA extracts of a maximum of 24 snails per species per site were subjected to the diagnostic multiplex PCR methods described in Schols et al. [42] and Carolus et al. [5]. These approaches enable rapid and cost-efficient diagnosis of trematode infections in snail DNA extracts, with simultaneous detection of Schistosoma spp. [42] or Fasciola spp. [5]. Both methods are based on the amplification of multiple amplicons of different lengths in a single PCR reaction: an internal control that amplifies 18S snail rDNA to confirm the success of the DNA extraction and PCR reaction, a general trematode primer pair designed to amplify the 18S rDNA of all trematode genera that have a reference sequence available in GenBank and Schistosoma- [42] or Fasciola- [5] specific internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) or mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) primers, respectively. All used primers and PCR protocols are described elsewhere [5, 42]. Samples that were positive for a Schistosoma spp. infection were subsequently analyzed using a second multiplex PCR according to the two-step approach described by Schols et al. [42]. This PCR differentiates between several schistosomes of veterinary and medical importance (i.e., S. haematobium, S. mansoni, S. mattheei and S. bovis/S. curassoni/S. guineensis) by generating species-specific COI amplicons of different lengths. By selectively screening all snail DNA extracts using either of the two methods (i.e., Lymnaeidae with the method of Carolus et al. [5] and Planorbidae with the method of Schols et al. [42]), we identified Schistosoma spp. and Fasciola spp. infections that were used for further analysis.

PCR and DNA sequencing

A fragment of the mitochondrial COI and a nuclear rDNA region covering the 18S rDNA marker, the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), the 5.8S rDNA marker, the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), and/or the partial 28S rDNA marker were amplified to assess the taxonomic position of trematode species sampled in this study. Additional file 1: Figure S4 indicates the annealing sites of the used primers for amplification of the rDNA region of adult liver flukes. The primers and resulting amplicon lengths are listed in Table 3, together with those for snail and trematode identification. We barcoded (COI sequencing) two random specimens per snail species and all Schistosoma and Fasciola spp. infected snails. For the parasites, we selected all Schistosoma and Fasciola spp. infections, all adult fasciolids and one adult amphistome specimen per morphotype. A new Fasciola-specific reverse primer COI_FAS_R (‘5-GACAAACAAACACAAGCAGG-3’), targeting a shorter COI fragment of 148 nucleotides when combined with the COI1_DIG_F primer (see Table 3), was designed to amplify DNA of the Fasciola museum samples, as no successful PCR amplification was obtained using the longer amplicon. It has become apparent that shorter amplicons (< 400 bp) outperform longer amplicons due to severe DNA fragmentation and/or degradation in old samples [107,108,109], such as the museum specimens in this study. Simplex PCR reactions and programs for sequencing were performed, according to Carolus et al. [5], in a 15 μL volume with 1.5 μL of DNA extract using the Qiagen™ Taq DNA polymerase kit containing 1.5 mM PCR buffer (Qiagen™), 0.6 mM dNTP mix (Qiagen™), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.45 units of Taq Polymerase (Qiagen™), 0.8 μM forward primer, and 0.8 μM reverse primer. The PCR reactions were performed as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 15 min, 39 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature depending on primer pair as listed in Table 3 for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min in a Tprofessional Thermocycler (Biometra™). PCR products were visualized by gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel with Midori Green Direct® staining and UV light. Samples that showed a clear amplified PCR product of the expected length were purified using the ExoSAP (Fermentas™) PCR purification protocol and sequenced using BigDye® chemistry (Macrogen™). The resulting sequences were processed (quality control, annotation, and generation of consensus sequences from forward and reverse primer sequencing) with Geneious® (R10). The Trim Ends command with an error probability limit of 5% in Geneious® was used to trim the obtained sequences. The complete chromatogram was inspected before and after consensus generation to resolve any additional ambiguities and ensure high sequence quality.

Table 3 Primers used to obtain mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S) amplicons for sequencing. The primer name is listed with the target organism, the targeted marker, the annealing temperature, the amplicon length, the primer sequence, and the literature reference from which primers were obtained. COI mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, ITS1 and ITS2 internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2, respectively bp base pairs, and F. nyanzae Fasciola nyanzae. The rDNA region and COI marker of the metacercariae were amplified with the 18S_Dig_F–1270R, ITS4–ITS5, and COI1_Dig_F–NasmitR primer combinations

Phylogenetic analysis

All sequences of sufficient quality were compared to the GenBank (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and BOLD (http://v3.boldsystems.org/) databases using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and BOLD Identification System (IDS), respectively. In case the species could not be clearly identified (i.e., no highly similar reference sequence or high identity matches to several species), a phylogenetic analysis was performed in which sequences of all closely related taxa, with an available sequence in the GenBank database, were aligned with the MUSCLE alignment algorithm [110] in AliView (version 1.26). Reference sequences of Fasciola nyanzae, Tenuifasciola tragelaphi, several amphistome families, and several members of the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus species complex [36] were absent from the database and could not be included in the analyses. The alignment was visually inspected for anomalies and trimmed to the largest possible consensus, and the model selection analysis was run in MEGA (version 10.2.5) to assess the suitability (i.e., best model or only marginally different AIC and BIC values from the best model) of the General Time Reversible (GTR) substitution model. This model proved suitable for all datasets with the exception of Lymnaeidae phylogeny, which required the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano (KHY) substitution model. The DAMBE software (version 7.2.152, [111]) was used to assess substitution saturation in all datasets through the Xia’s [112] and Steel’s method [113] according to Xia and Lemey [114]. For the Steel’s method, mean phi values below 0.04 were assumed to lack phylogenetic information and were removed following Xia and Lemey [114]. For the COI phylogeny, we tested the datasets for saturation in (1) the first and second codon position and (2) the third codon position. For the fasciolid rDNA dataset, we only assessed substitution saturation for the non-coding ITS1 and ITS2 markers as 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rDNA are slowly evolving markers. Possible saturation signals were evaluated by constructing a Maximum likelihood tree from DNAML in DAMBE and assessing the tree’s topology. The MEGA software was also used to estimate the corrected pairwise distances among COI sequences to correct for substitution saturation. For this, the Tamura-Nei (TN93) substitution model with gamma correction was applied. Gamma values were obtained through the model selection analysis in MEGA as mentioned above. A Bayesian inference of phylogeny was calculated using MrBayes (version 3.2.6) on the CIPRES portal (version 3.3) [115] (https://www.phylo.org/portal2) using the same model, for 10,000,000 generations while sampling the Markov chain every 1000 steps. The first 25% of the sampled values were discarded as burn-in and the analysis stopped if the convergence diagnostic fell below 0.01. Convergence was confirmed by checking whether the effective sampling size (ESS) was above 100 and by visually inspecting the absence of a trend in the convergence plots in MrBayes through the sump command and Tracer software (version 1.7.1). Finally, a maximum likelihood (ML) tree was also calculated through the IQ-tree web servers (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at), and nodal support was assessed through 1000 bootstrap replicates [116]. The resulting trees were rooted on the respective outgroup in Figtree (version 1.4.4). The same software was used to create a consensus tree, containing nodal support values of Bayesian inference and ML phylogenies, that was exported in PDF format to Adobe Acrobat Pro DC (version 2020.012.20048), in which we adjusted the position of ill placed nodal support values and italicized species names. All markers, alignment lengths, and obtained sequences used for phylogenetic analyses are provided in their respective section in the results.

Haplotype network of Fasciola nyanzae

A COI haplotype network based on 412 bp was constructed to study the genetic intraspecific variation of Fasciola nyanzae. The obtained COI sequences from two adult liver flukes and six snail infections were aligned with those obtained by Carolus et al. [5] (“GenBank: MK330623, MK330624, MK330625”) using the MUSCLE alignment algorithm [110] in AliView (version 1.26) and trimmed to the longest common overlapping sequence. Unique haplotypes were defined using the DnaSP® software (version 6.12) [117] and subsequently mapped in PopART® (version 1.7) (http://popart.otago.ac.nz) using the TCS network inference model [118].

Availability of data and materials

Lead contact

Further information requests should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Ruben Schols (ruben.schols@africamuseum.be; ruben.schols@kuleuven.be).

Materials availability

DNA and tissue samples of all studied parasites, snails, and the culled H. amphibius are stored in the RMCA’s collection and are available with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement, with the exception of Hippo stomach fluke type 2 as the complete worms were used for DNA extraction.

Data and code availability

The sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the public repository NCBI GenBank under: MT909560-MT909561, MT909545-MT909550, MT909542-MT909543, MT893586-MT893595, MT888842-MT888847, MT886702-MT886703, and MT884914-MT884924. All GenBank identifiers generated by this study, and those of Carolus et al. [5] and Muzarabani et al. (preprint, [33]) involved in the analyses, are listed together with the sample type, marker, taxonomic identification, and region of origin in Additional file 1: Table S6.

The sequence datasets used in this study are available in the supplementary file “Raw_data.”

Change history

  • 27 August 2021

    The Graphical Abstract has been added to this publication.

References

  1. 1.

    Tortajada C, Altinbilek D, Biswas AK. Impact of large dams: a global assessment: Springer; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23571-9.

  2. 2.

    De Leo GA, Stensgaard A-S, Sokolow SH, N’Goran EK, Chamberlin AJ, Yang G-J, et al. Schistosomiasis and climate change. BMJ. 2020;371:m4324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sci. 2015;77(1):161–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McAllister DE, Craig JF, Davidson N, Delany S, Seddon M. Biodiversioty impacts of large dams. IUCN—UN foundation; 2001.

  5. 5.

    Carolus H, Muzarabani KC, Hammoud C, Schols R, Volckaert FAM, Barson M, et al. A cascade of biological invasions and parasite spillback in man-made Lake Kariba. Sci Total Environ. 2019;659:1283–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gottdenker NL, Streicker DG, Faust CL, Carroll CR. Anthropogenic land use change and infectious diseases: a review of the evidence. Ecohealth. 2014;11(4):619–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0941-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Grabner DS, Mohamed FA, Nachev M, Meabed EM, Sabry AHA, Sures B. Invasion biology meets parasitology: a case study of parasite spill-back with Egyptian Fasciola gigantica in the invasive snail Pseudosuccinea columella. Plos One. 2014;9(2):e88537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088537.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kibret S, Lautze J, McCartney M, Wilson GG, Nhamo L. Malaria impact of large dams in sub-Saharan Africa: maps, estimates and predictions. Malar J. 2015;14(1):339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0873-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kibret S, Ryder D, Wilson GG, Kumar L. Modeling reservoir management for malaria control in Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Morley NJ. Anthropogenic effects of reservoir construction on the parasite fauna of aquatic wildlife. EcoHealth. 2007;4(4):374–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-007-0130-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sow S, de Vlas SJ, Engels D, Gryseels B. Water-related disease patterns before and after the construction of the Diama dam in northern Senegal. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96(6):575–86. https://doi.org/10.1179/000349802125001636.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jones BA, Grace D, Kock R, Alonso S, Rushton J, Said MY, et al. Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change. PNAS. 2013;110(21):8399–404. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208059110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Keiser J, Utzinger J. Emerging foodborne trematodiasis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(10):1507–14. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1110.050614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(7):411–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70521-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Halstead NT, Hoover CM, Arakala A, Civitello DJ, De Leo GA, Gambhir M, et al. Agrochemicals increase risk of human schistosomiasis by supporting higher densities of intermediate hosts. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03189-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sokolow SH, Jones IJ, Jocque M, La D, Cords O, Knight A, Lund A, Wood CL, Lafferty KD, Hoover CM, et al. Nearly 400 million people are at higher risk of schistosomiasis because dams block the migration of snail-eating river prawns. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2017;372(1722):20160127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Southgate V, Tchuem Tchuente L, Sene M, De Clercq D, Theron A, Jourdane J, et al. Studies on the biology of schistosomiasis with emphasis on the Senegal river basin. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96(suppl):75–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762001000900010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Morgan JA, Dejong RJ, Snyder SD, Mkoji GM, Loker ES. Schistosoma mansoni and Biomphalaria: past history and future trends. Parasitology. 2001;123(7):211–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182001007703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pointier JP, David P, Jarne P. Biological invasions: the case of planorbid snails. J Helminthol. 2005;79(3):249–56. https://doi.org/10.1079/JOH2005292.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mitchell DR, Leung TLF. Sharing the load: a survey of parasitism in the invasive freshwater pulmonate, Physa acuta (Hygrophila: Physidae) and sympatric native snail populations. Hydrobiologia. 2015;766(1):165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Johnson P, Thieltges D. Diversity, decoys and the dilution effect: how ecological communities affect disease risk. J Exp Biol. 2010;213(6):961–70. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.037721.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kelly D, Paterson R, Townsend C, Poulin R, Tompkins D. Parasite spillback: a neglected concept in invasion ecology? Ecology. 2009;90(8):2047–56. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1085.1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Agatsuma T, Arakawa Y, Iwagami M, Honzako Y, Cahyaningsih U, Kang S-Y, et al. Molecular evidence of natural hybridization between Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica. Parasitol Int. 2000;49(3):231–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5769(00)00051-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Le TH, Van De N, Agatsuma T, Nguyen TGT, Nguyen QD, McManus DP, et al. Human fascioliasis and the presence of hybrid/introgressed forms of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica in Vietnam. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38(6):725–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nguyen TBN, Van De N, Nguyen TKL, Quang HH, Doan HTT, Agatsuma T, et al. Distribution Status of Hybrid Types in Large Liver Flukes, Fasciola Species (Digenea: Fasciolidae), from Ruminants and Humans in Vietnam. Korean J Parasitol. 2018;56(5):453–61. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2018.56.5.453.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Will KW, Mishler BD, Wheeler QD. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst Biol. 2005;54(5):844–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500354878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dinnik JA, Dinnik NN. On the morphology and life history of Fasciola nyanzae Leiper, 1910 from the Hippopotamus. J Helminthol. 1961;35(S1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X00017570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jackson HG. A revision of the genus Fasciola. With particular reference to F. gigantica (Cobbold) and F. nyanzi (Leiper). Parasitology. 1921;13(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000012294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Leiper RT. The entozoa of the hippopotamus. In: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1910. p. 233–252.

  30. 30.

    Alicata JE. Observations on the life history of Fasciola gigantica, the common liver fluke of cattle in Hawaii, and the intermediate host, Fossaria ollula: University of Hawaii; 1938. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.87642.

  31. 31.

    Vareille-Morel C, Esclaire F, Hourdin P, Rondelaud D. Internal metacercarial cysts of Fasciola hepatica in the pulmonate snail Lymnaea truncatula. Parasitol Res. 1993;79(3):259–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931903.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lewison RL, Carter J. Exploring behavior of an unusual megaherbivore: a spatially explicit foraging model of the hippopotamus. Ecol Model. 2004;171(1-2):127–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00305-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Muzarabani KC, Carolus H, Hammoud C, Schols R, Barson M, Huyse T. More than meets the eye: a shift in the gastropod and trematode communities in Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.21397/v1. Research Square - Preprint; 2020.

  34. 34.

    Vilas R, Criscione CD, Blouin MS. A comparison between mitochondrial DNA and the ribosomal internal transcribed regions in prospecting for cryptic species of platyhelminth parasites. Parasitol. 2005;131(Pt 6):839–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182005008437.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lawton SP, Lim RM, Dukes JP, Kett SM, Cook RT, Walker AJ, et al. Unravelling the riddle of Radix: DNA barcoding for species identification of freshwater snail intermediate hosts of zoonotic digeneans and estimating their inter-population evolutionary relationships. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;35:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mukaratirwa S, Kristensen TK, Siegismund HR, Chandiwana SK. Genetic and morphological variation of populations belonging to the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus complex (Gastropoda; Planorbidae) in south western Zimbabwe. J Molluscan Stud. 1998;64(4):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/64.4.435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Aksenova OV, Vinarski MV, Kondakov V, Tomilova AA, Artamonova VS, Makhrov AA, et al. A new Radix species from Qinling Mountains, China (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae). Ecol Montenegrina. 2019;26:137–46. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2019.26.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vinarski MV, Aksenova OV, Bolotov IN. Taxonomic assessment of genetically-delineated species of radicine snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Lymnaeidae). Zoosyst Evol. 2020;96(2):577–608. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.52860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sigovini M, Keppel E, Tagliapietra D. Open Nomenclature in the biodiversity era. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7(10):1217–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nalugwa A, Kristensen TK, Nyakaana S, Jørgensen A. Mitochondrial DNA variations in sibling species of the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus complex in Lake Albert, western Uganda. Zool Stud. 2010;49(4):515–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schols R, Mudavanhu A, Carolus H, Hammoud C, Muzarabani KC, Barson M, et al. Exposing the barcoding void: an integrative approach to study snail-borne parasites in a one health context. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schols R, Carolus H, Hammoud C, Mulero S, Mudavanhu A, Huyse T. A rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR approach for xenomonitoring of human and animal schistosomiasis in a ‘One Health’ context. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2019;113(11):722–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trz067.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mas-Coma S, Valero MA, Bargues MD. Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control. Adv Parasitol. 2009;69:41–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(09)69002-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Vawter L, Brown WM. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA comparisons reveal extreme rate variation in the molecular clock. Science. 1986;234(4773):194–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3018931.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Huyse T, Webster BL, Geldof S, Stothard JR, Diaw OT, Polman K, et al. Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species. Plos Pathog. 2009;5(9):e1000571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000571.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fuertes Aguilar J, Rosselló J, Nieto Feliner G. Nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) concerted evolution in natural and artificial hybrids of Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Mol Ecol. 1999;8(8):1341–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00690.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lotfy WM, Brant SV, DeJong RJ, Le TH, Demiaszkiewicz A, Rajapakse RJ, et al. Evolutionary origins, diversification, and biogeography of liver flukes (Digenea, Fasciolidae). Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2008;79(2):248–55. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.248.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mas-Coma S, Bargues M. Populations, hybrids and the systematic concepts of species and subspecies in Chagas disease triatomine vectors inferred from nuclear ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA. Acta Trop. 2009;110(2-3):112–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.10.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gaither MR, Aeby G, Vignon M, Meguro Y-i, Rigby M, Runyon C, Toonen RJ, Wood CL, Bowen BW. An invasive fish and the time-lagged spread of its parasite across the Hawaiian archipelago. Plos one. 2013;8(2):e56940. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056940.

  50. 50.

    Lewison R, Pluháček J. Hippopotamus amphibius. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T10103A18567364. 2017.

  51. 51.

    Malatji MP, Lamb J, Mukaratirwa S. Molecular characterization of liver fluke intermediate host lymnaeids (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) snails from selected regions of Okavango Delta of Botswana, KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 2019;17:100318.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kriticos DJ, Brunel S. Assessing and managing the current and future pest risk from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), an invasive aquatic plant threatening the environment and water security. Plos one. 2016;11(8):e0120054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120054.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Van Eeden J, Brown D. Colonization of fresh waters in the Republic of South Africa by Lymnaea columella Say (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Nature. 1966;210(5041):1172–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/2101172a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pfukenyi DM, Mukaratirwa S. Amphistome infections in domestic and wild ruminants in East and Southern Africa: a review. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2018;85(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Toledo R, Fried B. Digenetic Trematodes: Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0915-5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Laidemitt MR, Zawadzki ET, Brant SV, Mutuku MW, Mkoji GM, Loker ES. Loads of trematodes: discovering hidden diversity of paramphistomoids in Kenyan ruminants. Parasitology. 2017;144(2):131–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016001827.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sey O. CRC Handbook of the Zoology of Amphistomes; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sey O, Graber M. Examination of amphistomes (Trematoda: Paramphistomidae) of some African mammals. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1979;32(2):161–7. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.8171.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wright C, Southgate V, Howard G. A note on the life-cycles of some amphistome flukes in Zambia. J Helminthol. 1979;53(3):251–2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X00006039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sey O. Scanning electron microscopic examination of the tegumental surface of some amphistomes (Trematoda: Amphistomida). Parasitol Hungarica. 1984;17:45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Morgan JA, DeJong RJ, Kazibwe F, Mkoji GM, Loker ES. A newly-identified lineage of Schistosoma. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33(9):977–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00132-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Pitchford R, Visser P. Schistosoma Weinland, 1858 from Hippopotamus amphibius Linnaeus, 1758 in the Kruger National Park; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Huffman JE. Selected wildlife trematodiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;766:429–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0915-5_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Mehmood K, Zhang H, Sabir AJ, Abbas RZ, Ijaz M, Durrani AZ, et al. A review on epidemiology, global prevalence and economical losses of fasciolosis in ruminants. Microbial Pathogen. 2017;109:253–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Nyirenda SS, Sakala M, Moonde L, Kayesa E, Fandamu P, Banda F, et al. Prevalence of bovine fascioliasis and economic impact associated with liver condemnation in abattoirs in Mongu district of Zambia. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rajapakse R, Lawton SP, Karunathilake KJK, Perera BVP, Nguyen NTB, Le TH. Molecular characterization of Fasciola jacksoni from wild elephants (Elephas maximus maximus) of Sri Lanka: a taxonomic evaluation. Parasitology. 2019;146(10):1247–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019000519.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Vitovec J, Kotrla B, Haji H, Hayles L. Fatal infection of an elephant calf caused by the trematode Protofasciola robusta (Lorenz, 1881) in Somaliland. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B. 1984;31(1-10):597–602.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Murray DL, Cox EW, Ballard WB, Whitlaw HA, Lenarz MS, Custer TW, et al. Pathogens, nutritional deficiency, and climate influences on a declining moose population. Wildlife Monographs. 2006;166:1–30. https://doi.org/10.2193/0084-0173(2006)166[1:PNDACI]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Gower CM, Vince L, Webster JP. Should we be treating animal schistosomiasis in Africa? The need for a One Health economic evaluation of schistosomiasis control in people and their livestock. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2017;111(6):244–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trx047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Devkota R, Brant SV, Thapa A, Loker ES. Sharing schistosomes: the elephant schistosome Bivitellobilharzia nairi also infects the greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. J Helminthol. 2014;88(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000697.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Standley CJ, Mugisha L, Dobson AP, Stothard JR. Zoonotic schistosomiasis in non-human primates: past, present and future activities at the human-wildlife interface in Africa. J Helminthol. 2012;86(2):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000028.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sanabria R, Romero J. Review and update of paramphistomosis. Helminthologia. 2008;45(2):64–8. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-008-0012-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Toledo R, Esteban J-G, Fried B. Immunology and pathology of intestinal trematodes in their definitive hosts. In: Advances in Parasitology Volume 63; 2006. p. 285–365.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Tandon V, Roy B, Shylla JA, Ghatani S. Amphistomes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;766:365–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0915-5_11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    McCully RM, Van Niekerk JW, Kruger SP. Observations on the pathology of bilharziasis and other parasitic infections of Hippopotamus amphibius Linnaeus, 1758, from the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1967;34(2):563–618.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Webster M. The medical aspects of the Kariba hydro-electric scheme. Central Afr J Med. 1960;6(Suppl):1–36.

  77. 77.

    Hira PR. Transmission of schistosomiasis in lake Kariba, Zambia. Nature. 1969;224(5220):670–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/224670a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Chimbari M, Chirundu D. Prevalence and intensity of the schistosomiasis situation along the Zimbabwean urban and peri-urban shoreline of Lake Kariba. Central Afr J Med. 2003;49:156–60.

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Chimbari MJ, Dhlomo E, Mwadiwa E, Mubila L. Transmission of schistosomiasis in Kariba, Zimbabwe, and a cross-sectional comparison of schistosomiasis prevalences and intensities in the town with those in Siavonga in Zambia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003;97(6):605–16. https://doi.org/10.1179/000349803225001508.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mubila L, Rollinson D. Snail-parasite compatibility and prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium on the shores of Lake Kariba, Zambia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96(2):165–73. https://doi.org/10.1179/000349802125000592.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Mungomba L, Chandiwana S, Madesen H. Schistosomiasis around Siavonga, on the shores of Lake Kariba, Zambia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1993;87(4):365–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1993.11812780.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ripple WJ, Newsome TM, Wolf C, Dirzo R, Everatt KT, Galetti M, et al. Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Sci Adv. 2015;1(4):e1400103. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Stears K, McCauley DJ, Finlay JC, Mpemba J, Warrington IT, Mutayoba BM, et al. Effects of the hippopotamus on the chemistry and ecology of a changing watershed. PNAS. 2018;115(22):E5028–37. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800407115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Veldhuis MP, Kihwele ES, Cromsigt J, Ogutu JO, Hopcraft JGC, Owen-Smith N, et al. Large herbivore assemblages in a changing climate: incorporating water dependence and thermoregulation. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(10):1536–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13350.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lewison R. Population responses to natural and human-mediated disturbances: assessing the vulnerability of the common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius). Afr J Ecol. 2007;45:407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Carrizo SF, Jähnig SC, Bremerich V, Freyhof J, Harrison I, He F, et al. Freshwater megafauna: flagships for freshwater biodiversity under threat. BioScience. 2017;67(10):919–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix099.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Polley L. Navigating parasite webs and parasite flow: emerging and re-emerging parasitic zoonoses of wildlife origin. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(11-12):1279–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Pedersen AB, Jones KE, Nunn CL, Altizer S. Infectious diseases and extinction risk in wild mammals. Conserv Biol. 2007;21(5):1269–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00776.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Smith KF, Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Pedersen AB. The role of infectious diseases in biological conservation. Anim Conserv. 2009;12(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00228.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Heard MJ, Smith KF, Ripp K, Berger M, Chen J, Dittmeier J, et al. The threat of disease increases as species move toward extinction. Conserv Biol. 2013;27(6):1378–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Obanda V, Iwaki T, Mutinda N, Gakuya F. Gastrointestinal parasites and associated pathological lesions in starving free-ranging African elephants. Afr J Wildlife Res. 2011;41(2):167–72. https://doi.org/10.3957/056.041.0203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Thompson RC, Lymbery AJ, Smith A. Parasites, emerging disease and wildlife conservation. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40(10):1163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.04.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Cunningham AA, Daszak P, Wood JLN. One Health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife: two decades of progress? Philos Transact Royal Soc B. 2017;372(1725):20160167. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Brecko J, Mathys A, Dekoninck W, Leponce M, VandenSpiegel D, Semal P. Focus stacking: comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach, A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. Zookeys. 2014;464:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Geo-referenced Database on Dams. http://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/dams. Accessed 11/05/2020.

  96. 96.

    Muchuru S, Landman WA, DeWitt DG. Prediction of inflows into Lake Kariba using a combination of physical and empirical models. Int J Climatol. 2016;36(6):2570–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Brown SD. Freshwater snails of Africa and their medical importance. 2nd ed. CRC press; 1994. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482295184.

  98. 98.

    Mandahl-Barth G. Key to the identification of east and central African freshwater snails of medical and veterinary importance. Bull World Health Organ. 1962;27(1):135–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Frandsen F, Christensen N. introductory guide to the identification of cercariae from African freshwater snails with special reference to cercariae of trematode species of medical and veterinary importance Taxonomic key. Acta Trop. 1984;41.2(2):181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Mas-Coma S. Epidemiology of fascioliasis in human endemic areas. J Helminthol. 2005;79(3):207–16. https://doi.org/10.1079/JOH2005296.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Shedlock AM, Haygood MG, Pietsch TW, Bentzen P. Enhanced DNA extraction and PCR amplification of mitochondrial genes from formalin-fixed museum specimens. Biotechniques. 1997;22(3):394–400. https://doi.org/10.2144/97223bm03.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Ziętara MS, Arndt A, Geets A, Hellemans B, Volckaert FA. The nuclear rDNA region of Gyrodactylus arcuatus and G. branchicus (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae). J Parasitol. 2000;86(6):1368–73. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[1368:TNRROG]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Caron Y, Righi S, Lempereur L, Saegerman C, Losson B. An optimized DNA extraction and multiplex PCR for the detection of Fasciola sp. in lymnaeid snails. Vet Parasitol. 2011;178(1-2):93–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Waeschenbach A, Webster BL, Bray RA, Littlewood D. Added resolution among ordinal level relationships of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) with complete small and large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2007;45(1):311–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.019.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Littlewood DTJ, Olson PD. Small subunit rDNA and the Platyhelminthes: signal, noise, conflict and compromise. Interrelation Platyhelminthes. 2001:262–78.

  106. 106.

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols. 1990;18(1):315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Pääbo S. Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification. PNAS. 1989;86(6):1939–43. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Jaksch K, Eschner A, Rintelen TV, Haring E. DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2147-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Matheson CD, David R, Spigelman M, Donoghue HD. Molecular confirmation of Schistosoma and family relationship in two ancient Egyptian mummies. In: Dr V, editor. Friedrich Pfeil; 2014. p. 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Xia X. DAMBE7: New and improved tools for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1550–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy073.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Xia X, Xie Z, Salemi M, Chen L, Wang Y. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Mol Phylogen Evol. 2003;26(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00326-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Steel M, Lockhart P, Penny D. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature. 1993;364(6436):440–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/364440a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Xia X, Lemey P. Assessing substitution saturation with DAMBE. In: Vandamme A-M, Salemi M, Lemey P, editors. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 615–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Comput Environ Workshop (GCE). 2010.

  116. 116.

    Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W232–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(12):3299–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Clement M, Snell Q, Walker P, Posada D, Crandall K. TCS: estimating gene genealogies. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International; 2002. p. 0184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the field team of Lake Kariba Research Station, Z. Khali, G. Mupandawana, E. Dlomo, and T. Madzivanzira, for their great help during the fieldwork in Kariba, and S. Gombedza, I. Walter, and T. Mhlanga for their help during the fieldwork in Mwenje. We also want to thank prof T. Nhiwatiwa for his continuous support throughout the project and J. Brecko and D. VandenSpiegel for photographing the adult parasite specimens. We also want to thank M. Vinarski for the discussion on the identification of Radix aff. plicatula and B. Vrancken for his support with the phylogenetic analyses.

Funding

Research was financed by project S1_ZMB_SNAILS_SUPPORT 2018 of the annual program of the Cooperation Agreement between the Belgian Development Cooperation and the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA). RS was supported by BRAIN-be 2.0 under the MicroResist project (B2/191/P1/MicroResist). RS received a VLIR-UOS travel grant (REI-2018-01-01) to conduct the sampling campaign in Zimbabwe. HC was supported by a PhD fellowship from the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO), grant nr. 11D7620N. CH was supported by a PhD fellowship of FWO, grant nr. 11C5219N.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: R.S., H.C., and T.H.; formal analysis: R.S.; investigation: R.S., H.C., and K.M.; resources: M.B and T.H.; funding: TH; data curation: R.S.; writing—original draft: R.S. and H.C.; writing—review and editing: R.S., H.C., C.H., K. M., M.B., and T.H.; supervision: C.H., M.B., and T.H. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Twitter handles: @rubenschols (Ruben Schols), @CarolusHans (Hans Carolus), @kc_muzarabani (Kudzai C. Muzarabani), @MBarson91 (Maxwell Barson), and @HuyseTine (Tine Huyse).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Schols.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Research permits were obtained through the University of Zimbabwe (UZ), Faculty of Science Research Ethics Subcommittee in Harare, Zimbabwe. The Lake Kariba Research Station managed by the University of Zimbabwe has a memorandum of understanding with the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority for research cooperation on Lake Kariba. It is within the context of this cooperation that permission was granted for sample collection. Permits for export and import were issued by the head of the Permits Section of the Directorate of Veterinary Services, Dr. Uchirai Chindezwa, organized through Prof. Maxwell Barson.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

. SEM imaging of ‘Hippo stomach fluke type 1’. Figure S2. The morphometric approach to identify the hippo liver flukes. Figure S3. F. nyanzae metacercariae isolated from P. columella. Figure S4. Primers used to amplify the partial rDNA region of F. nyanzae. Figure S5. COI-based Phylogeny of the Radix genus. Figure S6. COI-based Phylogenies of the genera Bulinus and Biomphalaria. Table S1. Corrected COI genetic distances for the subfamily Fasciolinae. Table S2. Corrected rDNA genetic distances for the subfamily Fasciolinae. Table S3. Corrected COI genetic distances for the genus Radix. Table S4. Corrected COI genetic distances for the genus Biomphalaria. Table S5. Corrected COI genetic distances for the genus Bulinus. Table S6. Accession numbers generated in this study, Carolus et al. [5] and Muzarabani et al. (preprint, [33]).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schols, R., Carolus, H., Hammoud, C. et al. Invasive snails, parasite spillback, and potential parasite spillover drive parasitic diseases of Hippopotamus amphibius in artificial lakes of Zimbabwe. BMC Biol 19, 160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01093-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trematodiasis1
  • Xenomonitoring2
  • One Health3
  • Barcoding4
  • Artificial lake5
  • Integrative taxonomy6
  • Taxonomic impediment7
  • Parasitology8
  • Conservation9
  • Biological invasions10